DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2104.07608V1 [Cs.CV] 15 Apr 2021

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2104.07608V1 [Cs.CV] 15 Apr 2021 Camera View Adjustment Prediction for Improving Image Composition Yu-Chuan Su Raviteja Vemulapalli Ben Weiss Chun-Te Chu Philip Andrew Mansfield Lior Shapira Colvin Pitts Google Research Abstract Initial view View Adjustment Model Image composition plays an important role in the qual- ity of a photo. However, not every camera user possesses the knowledge and expertise required for capturing well- Move-Down composed photos. While post-capture cropping can im- Real-time Needs adjustment: Yes prove the composition sometimes, it does not work in many feedback Adjustment: common scenarios in which the photographer needs to ad- just the camera view to capture the best shot. To address Magnitude: 20% this issue, we propose a deep learning-based approach that Adjust the view provides suggestions to the photographer on how to adjust the camera view before capturing. By optimizing the com- position before a photo is captured, our system helps pho- Photo with improved composition tographers to capture better photos. As there is no publicly- available data for this task, we create a view adjustment dataset by repurposing existing image cropping datasets. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage semi-supervised ap- Figure 1: Our goal is to improve the composition of the proach that utilizes both labeled and unlabeled images for captured photo by providing view adjustment suggestions training a view adjustment model. Experiment results show when the user is composing the shot. that the proposed semi-supervised approach outperforms justment dataset, the crops predicted by the state-of-the-art the corresponding supervised alternatives, and our user GAIC cropping model [48] have an average IoU of 0.61 study results show that the suggested view adjustment im- with the groundtruth views, clearly indicating that cropping proves image composition 79% of the time. is not enough. In comparison, the proposed view adjust- ment model achieves a much higher IoU of 0.75. While there are some existing rules for composing pho- 1. Introduction tos, each rule is valid only for specific scenes, and requires Image composition has a significant effect on the percep- detection of various low-level (leading lines, triangles, etc.) tion of an image. While a good composition can help make and high-level semantic (face/person, foreground objects) cues. Furthermore, it is non-trivial to determine which rule arXiv:2104.07608v1 [cs.CV] 15 Apr 2021 a great picture out of the dullest subjects and plainest of en- vironments, a bad composition can easily ruin a photograph or combination of rules is applicable for a given scene. despite how interesting the subject may be. Unfortunately, To address this problem, we introduce a system that pro- a typical camera user may lack the knowledge and expertise vides camera view adjustment suggestions to the photogra- required to capture images with great composition. pher when they are composing the shot. Given a view com- A commonly used technique for improving image com- posed by the user, our goal is to suggest a candidate view position is image cropping, and several existing works study adjustment and its magnitude such that the photo captured how to crop images automatically [38,5, 35, 29,4, 49, 23, after applying the adjustment will have a better composi- 11, 31, 40, 10,7, 12, 44,6, 42, 47, 26, 39, 48]. How- tion (see Fig.1). Specifically, we consider the following ever, cropping works only in limited scenarios in which the adjustments in this work: horizontal (left or right), vertical best composition can be achieved by removal of certain por- (up or down), zoom (in or out), and rotation (clockwise or tions of the image. It is not suitable in many common sce- counter clockwise) along the principal axis. The adjustment narios where the photographer needs to adjust the camera magnitude is represented using a percentage of the image view to get the best shot. When evaluated on our view ad- size for all adjustments except rotation, for which we use We evaluate our approach on a view adjustment dataset consisting of 3,026 samples generated from 521 images from the FCDB [6] and GAICD [47] datasets. Quantitative results show that the proposed semi-supervised approach clearly outperforms the corresponding supervised alterna- Figure 2: View adjustment enables more diverse modifica- tives, and user study shows that the adjustments suggested tion to image composition, and can improve composition in by our model improve the composition 79% of the time. scenarios where image cropping fails. Our major contributions are as follows. First, we for- mulate the problem of view adjustment prediction for im- radians. By adjusting the view prior to capture, we enable proving image composition. Second, we introduce a labeled generic modifications to image composition. Hence, our dataset for evaluating view adjustment prediction models. system can improve image composition in scenarios where Finally, we propose a two-stage semi-supervised approach cropping fails (see Fig.2). Note that this work focuses on that leverages both labeled and unlabeled data to train the static scenes, or more specifically scenes where motion is view adjustment model. We show that the proposed semi- not the subject (e.g. portraits, nature and urban environment supervised approach outperforms the corresponding super- photography). Suggesting view adjustments may not be suit vised alternative quantitatively and demonstrate the effec- dynamic (wildlife, sports, actions) scenes where lightning- tiveness of our model through user study. quick decisions are required from the photographer. To the best of our knowledge, there is no publicly- 2. Related Work available data for evaluating the performance of view ad- Image cropping Cropping is a widely used technique for justment prediction. While a common practice is for human changing image composition during post-processing, and raters to annotate images with ground truth labels, this is automatic image cropping algorithms aim to find the best difficult for view adjustment because the results of adjust- crop within an image. One common approach followed ment are generally not available. The raters need to infer by existing methods is to select the candidate crops us- how the adjustment affects the composition, which may be ing a scoring function, and the research focus has been difficult without professional photography knowledge. In- on designing a good scoring function for cropping. Exist- stead, we create a new view adjustment dataset from exist- ing works exploit saliency [38,5, 35, 29,4], photography ing image cropping datasets. The idea is to convert view ad- rules [49, 23, 11], or a data driven approach to learn the justments into operations on 2D image bounding boxes and scoring function [31, 40, 10,7, 12, 44,6, 42, 47, 26, 39, 48, use the best crop annotation as the target view for adjust- 22]. While early methods learn the cropping model using ment. The proposed approach allows us to generate samples unsupervised data [7, 12] or data annotated for generic im- and view adjustment labels from image cropping datasets age aesthetic quality [31, 40, 10], recent works show that a automatically without additional human labor. large scale annotated dataset designed specifically for crop- We acknowledge that our view adjustment dataset is not ping is essential for learning the state-of-the-art image crop- ideal in several respects. It ignores perspective distortions ping model [42, 47, 26, 39, 48]. Instead of following the while adjusting the camera view, and the adjustment mag- scoring function paradigm, some works try to predict the nitude could be limited depending on the ratios between the target crop directly without generating and scoring candi- best crop and the uncropped image sizes. Despite these lim- date crops [19, 20, 25, 21, 24]. itations, our view adjustment dataset still provides a good Our goal is not to produce the best image crop; it is to starting point to evaluate composition-aware view adjust- improve image composition while the photographer is com- ment prediction models. Furthermore, we address these posing the image. Because view adjustment is a more gen- limitations by also evaluating the view adjustment model on eral operation than image cropping, it may improve compo- 360◦ images, which do not suffer from distortions or limited sition in scenarios where cropping is not suitable. Further- field-of-view (FOV). Please refer to Sec. 4.3 for details. more, a view adjustment model needs to make a suggestion Another limitation of our view adjustment dataset is that based on partial information, while the target crop is fully its amount and diversity is inherently limited by the crop- visible to image cropping models. This introduces unique ping datasets. Because state-of-the-art machine learning challenges in view adjustment prediction for both data col- models typically require a large and diverse dataset to train lection and modeling. well, our view adjustment dataset may not be sufficient for training a good view adjustment model. In light of this Photography recommendation Prior works on photog- problem, we propose a two-stage training approach that raphy recommendation provide various types of sugges- makes use of additional unlabeled images. See Fig.3. Our tions. Some of them study person location recommenda- empirical results show that the additional unlabeled data is tion [50, 43, 28, 27, 41, 34]. They take a scenic image as important for improving model performance. input and suggest where a person should stand within the Unlabeled Image Well-composed Image Cropping Annotation Composition Pseudo Label Scoring Model Generation Need adjustment? (Sec. 3.2) (Sec. 3.3) View Adjustment Which adjustment? Model Best Image Crop (Sec. 3.4) Adjustment magnitude? Perturb View Adjustment Label Generation (Sec. 3.1) Figure 3: Our two-stage semi-supervsied approach leverages both labeled and unlabeled data to learn the view adjustment model.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 151 Australasian Journal of Information Systems Volume 13 Number 2 May 2006
    AN EXPLORATION OF USER INTERFACE DESIGNS FOR REAL-TIME PANORAMIC PHOTOGRAPHY Patrick Baudisch, Desney Tan, Drew Steedly, Eric Rudolph, Matt Uyttendaele, Chris Pal, and Richard Szeliski Microsoft Research One Microsoft Way Redmond, WA 98052, USA Email: {baudisch, desney, steedly, erudolph, mattu, szeliski}@ microsoft.com pal@ cs.umass.edu ABSTRACT Image stitching allows users to combine multiple regular-sized photographs into a single wide-angle picture, often referred to as a panoramic picture. To create such a panoramic picture, users traditionally first take all the photographs, then upload them to a PC and stitch. During stitching, however, users often discover that the produced panorama contains artifacts or is incomplete. Fixing these flaws requires retaking individual images, which is often difficult by this time. In this paper, we present Panoramic Viewfinder, an interactive system for panorama construction that offers a real-time preview of the panorama while shooting. As the user swipes the camera across the scene, each photo is immediately added to the preview. By making ghosting and stitching failures apparent, the system allows users to immediately retake necessary images. The system also provides a preview of the cropped panorama. When this preview includes all desired scene elements, users know that the panorama will be complete. Unlike earlier work in the field of real-time stitching, this paper focuses on the user interface aspects of real-time stitching. We describe our prototype, individual shooting modes, and provide an overview of our implementation. Building on our experiences with Panoramic Viewfinder, we discuss a separate design that relaxes the level of synchrony between user and camera required by the current system and provide usage flexibility that we believe might further improve the user experience.
    [Show full text]
  • Panorama Photography by Andrew Mcdonald
    Panorama Photography by Andrew McDonald Crater Lake - Andrew McDonald (10520 x 3736 - 39.3MP) What is a Panorama? A panorama is any wide-angle view or representation of a physical space, whether in painting, drawing, photography, film/video, or a three-dimensional model. Downtown Kansas City, MO – Andrew McDonald (16614 x 4195 - 69.6MP) How do I make a panorama? Cropping of normal image (4256 x 2832 - 12.0MP) Union Pacific 3985-Andrew McDonald (4256 x 1583 - 6.7MP) • Some Cameras have had this built in • APS Cameras had a setting that would indicate to the printer that the image should be printed as a panorama and would mask the screen off. Some 35mm P&S cameras would show a mask to help with composition. • Advantages • No special equipment or technique required • Best (only?) option for scenes with lots of movement • Disadvantages • Reduction in resolution since you are cutting away portions of the image • Depending on resolution may only be adequate for web or smaller prints How do I make a panorama? Multiple Image Stitching + + = • Digital cameras do this automatically or assist Snake River Overlook – Andrew McDonald (7086 x 2833 - 20.0MP) • Some newer cameras do this by “sweeping the camera” across the scene while holding the shutter button. Images are stitched in-camera. • Other cameras show the left or right edge of prior image to help with composition of next image. Stitching may be done in-camera or multiple images are created. • Advantages • Resolution can be very high by using telephoto lenses to take smaller slices of the scene
    [Show full text]
  • Basics of Cinematography HCID 521
    University of Washington Basics of Cinematography HCID 521 January 2015 Justin Hamacher University of Washington Cinematography Basics INTRODUCTION 2 Justin Hamacher Overview University of Washington 30% SENIOR ON-SHORE 3 Justin Hamacher University of Washington Cinematography Principles Storyboarding 4 Justin Hamacher University of Washington Cinematography Principles 5 Justin Hamacher University of Washington Planes of the Image • Background = part of the image that is the furthest distance from the camera • Middle ground = midpoint within the image • Foreground = part of the image that is the closest to the camera Justin Hamacher University of Washington Framing Framing = using the borders of the cinematic image (the film frame) to select and compose what is visible onscreen In filming, the frame is formed by the viewfinder on the camera In projection, it is formed by the screen Justin Hamacher University of Washington Cropping Cropping refers to the removal of the outer parts of an image to improve framing, accentuate subject matter or change aspect ratio. Justin Hamacher University of Washington Framing: Camera Height Relative height of the camera in relation to eye-level At eye level Below eye level Justin Hamacher University of Washington Framing: Camera Level The camera’s relative horizontal position in relation to the horizon • Parallel to horizon • Canted framing Justin Hamacher University of Washington Framing: Camera Angle Vantage point imposed on image by camera’s position Straight-On High Angle Low Angle Justin Hamacher University of Washington Speed of Motion Rate at which images are recorded and projected The standard frame rate for movies is 24 frames per second Filming at higher rate (>24 fps) results in motion appearing slowed-down when projected at 24 fps Filming at a lower rate (<24 fps) results in motion appearing sped-up when projected at 24 fps.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Dragonframe 4.Pdf
    Using DRAGONFRAME 4 Welcome Dragonframe is a stop-motion solution created by professional anima- tors—for professional animators. It's designed to complement how the pros animate. We hope this manual helps you get up to speed with Dragonframe quickly. The chapters in this guide give you the information you need to know to get proficient with Dragonframe: “Big Picture” on page 1 helps you get started with Dragonframe. “User Interface” on page 13 gives a tour of Dragonframe’s features. “Camera Connections” on page 39 helps you connect cameras to Drag- onframe. “Cinematography Tools” on page 73 and “Animation Tools” on page 107 give details on Dragonframe’s main workspaces. “Using the Timeline” on page 129 explains how to use the timeline in the Animation window to edit frames. “Alternative Shooting Techniques (Non Stop Motion)” on page 145 explains how to use Dragonframe for time-lapse. “Managing Your Projects and Files” on page 149 shows how to use Dragonframe to organize and manage your project. “Working with Audio Clips” on page 159 and “Reading Dialogue Tracks” on page 171 explain how to add an audip clip and create a track reading. “Using the X-Sheet” on page 187 explains our virtual exposure sheet. “Automate Lighting with DMX” on page 211 describes how to use DMX to automate lights. “Adding Input and Output Triggers” on page 241 has an overview of using Dragonframe to trigger events. “Motion Control” on page 249 helps you integrate your rig with the Arc Motion Control workspace or helps you use other motion control rigs.
    [Show full text]
  • A Good Practices Guide for Digital Image Correlation
    A Good Practices Guide for Digital Image Correlation Standardization, Good Practices, and Uncertainty Quantication Committee October, 2018 Safety Disclaimer This guide does not address the health or safety concerns regarding applying DIC in a mechanical testing or laboratory environment. It is the responsibility of the laboratory and user to determine the appropriate safety and health requirements. ii Copyright ©2018 by International Digital Image Correlation Society (iDICs) Some rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, but only without alteration and with full attribution to the Inter- national Digital Image Correlation Society (iDICs). Exception is given in the case of brief quotations embodied in other documents with full attribution to the International Digital Image Correlation Society, but not in a way that suggests endorsement of the other document by the International Digital Image Correlation Society. For permission requests, contact the International Digital Image Correlation Society at [email protected]. DOI: 10.32720/idics/gpg.ed1/print.format Electronic copies of this guide are available at www.idics.org. Suggested citation: International Digital Image Correlation Society, Jones, E.M.C. and Iadicola, M.A. (Eds.) (2018). A Good Practices Guide for Digital Image Correlation. https://doi.org/10.32720/idics/gpg.ed1/print.format. iii About this Guide The International Digital Image Correlation Society (iDICs) was founded in 2015 as a nonprofit scientific and educational organization committed to training and educating users of digital image correlation (DIC) systems. iDICs is composed of members from academia, government, and industry, and develops world-recognized DIC training and certifications to improve industry practice of DIC for general applications, with em- phasis on both research and establishing standards for DIC measurement techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • The Integrity of the Image
    world press photo Report THE INTEGRITY OF THE IMAGE Current practices and accepted standards relating to the manipulation of still images in photojournalism and documentary photography A World Press Photo Research Project By Dr David Campbell November 2014 Published by the World Press Photo Academy Contents Executive Summary 2 8 Detecting Manipulation 14 1 Introduction 3 9 Verification 16 2 Methodology 4 10 Conclusion 18 3 Meaning of Manipulation 5 Appendix I: Research Questions 19 4 History of Manipulation 6 Appendix II: Resources: Formal Statements on Photographic Manipulation 19 5 Impact of Digital Revolution 7 About the Author 20 6 Accepted Standards and Current Practices 10 About World Press Photo 20 7 Grey Area of Processing 12 world press photo 1 | The Integrity of the Image – David Campbell/World Press Photo Executive Summary 1 The World Press Photo research project on “The Integrity of the 6 What constitutes a “minor” versus an “excessive” change is necessarily Image” was commissioned in June 2014 in order to assess what current interpretative. Respondents say that judgment is on a case-by-case basis, practice and accepted standards relating to the manipulation of still and suggest that there will never be a clear line demarcating these concepts. images in photojournalism and documentary photography are world- wide. 7 We are now in an era of computational photography, where most cameras capture data rather than images. This means that there is no 2 The research is based on a survey of 45 industry professionals from original image, and that all images require processing to exist. 15 countries, conducted using both semi-structured personal interviews and email correspondence, and supplemented with secondary research of online and library resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Arresting Beauty, Framing Evidence: an Inquiry Into Photography and the Teaching of Writing
    University of New Hampshire University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository Doctoral Dissertations Student Scholarship Spring 2009 Arresting beauty, framing evidence: An inquiry into photography and the teaching of writing Kuhio Walters University of New Hampshire, Durham Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation Recommended Citation Walters, Kuhio, "Arresting beauty, framing evidence: An inquiry into photography and the teaching of writing" (2009). Doctoral Dissertations. 492. https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/492 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized administrator of University of New Hampshire Scholars' Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ARRESTING BEAUTY, FRAMING EVIDENCE: AN INQUIRY INTO PHOTOGRAPHY AND THE TEACHING OF WRITING BY KUHIO WALTERS Baccalaureate of Art Degree, California State University, Fresno, 1997 Master of Art Degree, California State University, Fresno, 1999 DISSERATATION Submitted to the University of New Hampshire in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy In English May, 2009 UMI Number: 3363736 Copyright 2009 by Walters, Kuhio INFORMATION TO USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
    [Show full text]
  • Panoramas Made Simple How to Create Beautiful Panoramas with the Equipment You Have—Even Your Phone Hudson Henry
    PANORAMAS MADE SIMPLE HOW TO CREATE BEAUTIFUL PANORAMAS WITH THE EQUIPMENT YOU HAVE—EVEN YOUR PHONE HUDSON HENRY PANORAMAS MADE SIMPLE How to create beautiful panoramas with the equipment you have—even your phone By Hudson Henry Complete Digital Photography Press Portland, Oregon Copyright ©2017 Hudson Henry All rights reserved. First edition, November 2017 Publisher: Rick LePage Design: Farnsworth Design Published by Complete Digital Photography Press Portland, Oregon completedigitalphotography.com All photography ©Hudson Henry Photography, unless otherwise noted. TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE MY PASSION FOR PANORAMAS 1 3 CAPTURING THE FRAMES 26 How is this book organized? Lens selection Exposure metering AN INTRODUCTION TO PANORAMIC PHOTOGRAPHY 1 5 Use a tripod Go wide and with more detail The importance of being level Simple panoramas defined Orient your camera Not all panoramas are narrow slices Focus using live view Equipment for simple panoramas Beware of polarizers or graduated filters Advanced panoramas Marking your panoramas Compose wide and use lots of overlap 2 THINKING ABOUT LIGHT, FOCUS AND SETUP 12 Move quickly and carefully Light and composition: the rules still apply Watch out for parallax 4 ASSEMBLING YOUR PANORAMA 35 Finding the infinity distance My workflow at a glance Learning how to lock your camera settings Building panoramas with Lightroom Classic CC Why shouldn’t I use my phone’s automatic panorama mode? Working with Photoshop CC to create panoramas Why is manual exposure so important? Building panoramas in ON1 Photo RAW 2018 5 RESOURCES 52 Links PREFACE MY PASSION FOR PANORAMAS My first panorama, I GREW UP WITH ADVENTURESOME EXTENDED FAM- with image quality.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 23 - Visual Arts / Photography
    SECTION 23 - VISUAL ARTS / PHOTOGRAPHY Photography & Multimedia Design - exhibits must have been created by the exhibitor as part of a 4-H program or project during the current year and should reflect a meaningful, thoughtful process. It is strongly recommended that youth consult instructional materials for guidance during their project. Options: National 4-H Council-Approved Photography curriculum (https://shop4- h.org/products/2019-photography-set-of-3) as well as others. If youth use resources, please include links or listing in your project materials. LEVELS: Selecting Your Levels: Youth who have never taken a photography project in 4-H should start in Level I. Youth who have been working on photography for several years should work with educators to select the appropriate level. Moving Up Levels: Youth who received a white or red ribbon in their class should remain in that same level the following year. Youth who receive their first blue ribbon in a level may (but are not required) to advance to the next level in the following year. Once a youth has received two blue ribbon in the level they must advance to the next level. CAMERA TYPES & DATA TAGS: Youth are permitted to shoot on film, digital and/or cell phone cameras. The type of camera used must be included in project documentation. Youth may use automatic settings but should be able to find the metadata information on the photo to include in project documentation. Exhibit must have additional information (Data Tag) attached to the back of the photo/print. For cell phone photography, downloadable Apps for Data Tags are acceptable.
    [Show full text]
  • Instructions for Digital Soil Survey Images Rev
    Instructions for Digital Soil Survey Images Rev. 02/2006 Today, most of the published soil surveys are being formatted electronically in a “pdf” (portable document file) format utilizing digital images. This format can be used for the traditional printed soil survey report, for CDs, or for posting on the internet. One of the big advantages of the electronically formatted manuscript is that it can utilize both digitally captured images and images stored on film. If a digital camera is used, you must: 1) use the correct file format (uncompressed—TIFF preferred), and 2) select the correct resolution (300 ppi—color; 150 ppi—B&W; 600—line drawings) If digital images are now acceptable, should I use a digital camera or should I continue to use film and scan and convert to a digital image? There are many high quality digital cameras in the marketplace today. These cameras are small, lightweight, and easy to use and the images are immediately available for evaluation or use. However, the camera must be able to capture the image at a resolution suitable for publication. The resolution recommended by GPO (Government Printing Office) for printed documents is 300 dpi (dots per inch). Even though a printer dot is not the same as an image pixel, they are roughly comparable. For example, a typical soil survey cover is 7.0 x 6.5 inches. To produce a quality image suitable for publication, the following formula would be used to determine the minimum number of pixels required: [(7.0 in. x 300 ppi) x (6.0 in.
    [Show full text]
  • Correction of Uneven Illumination (Vignetting) in Digital Microscopy Images F J W-M Leong, M Brady, J O’D Mcgee
    619 SHORT REPORT J Clin Pathol: first published as 10.1136/jcp.56.8.619 on 30 July 2003. Downloaded from Correction of uneven illumination (vignetting) in digital microscopy images F J W-M Leong, M Brady, J O’D McGee ............................................................................................................................. J Clin Pathol 2003;56:619–621 improve appearances. This is one of the benefits of working in Background: Many digital microscopy images suffer from the digital medium over conventional chemical based imag- poor illumination at the peripheries (vignetting), often ing. Unfortunately, a white shading correction image must be attributable to factors related to the light path between the acquired for each objective magnification and recalculated if camera and the microscope. A commonly used method for the microscope illumination settings are altered. correcting this has been to use the illumination of an empty For those using simple techniques, such as holding a digital field as a correction filter (white shading correction). camera to the eyepiece, this task is difficult and inaccurate, Aims: To develop an alternative shading correction particularly given variations in the positioning of the camera method that does not require this additional image. relative to the eyepiece between photographs. Methods/Results: This report outlines an alternative shad- In other situations, the vignetting is not obvious when ing correction method that is based upon the intrinsic acquiring images and only becomes apparent when the properties of the image, which are revealed through Gaus- microscopist adjusts contrast or brightness within their image sian smoothing. The technique can be implemented within editing software. By then, it may be too late to take the white Adobe Photoshop or other graphics editing software and reference image.
    [Show full text]
  • Brenizer Method
    Speaker Notes: Brenizer Method Slide 1 / Open Slide: Brenizer Method Also known as: • Panoramic Stitching • Bokeh Panorama • Bokehrama Slide 2: Panoramic Stitching • Panoramic Photography dates back to 1843 • Some cameras used wide film or wide angle lenses on sliders Shortly after the invention of photography in 1839, the desire to show overviews of cities and landscapes prompted photographers to create panoramas. Early panoramas were made by placing two or more daguerreotype plates side-by-side. Daguerreotypes, the first commercially available photographic process, used silver- coated copper plates to produce highly detailed images. One of the first recorded patents for a panoramic camera was submitted by Joseph Puchberger in Austria in 1843 for a hand-cranked, 150° field of view, 8-inch focal length camera that exposed a relatively large Daguerreotype, up to 24 inches long! Slide 3: Large Format Photography A popular early format, adaptable to many lenses because of it's bellows and allowed precise work because you can see the image on a piece of oiled paper before using exposing your film. With a few notable exceptions, these cameras share the following characteristics: • Large image size: 4x5 inches (10x12cm), the most popular format by far, up to 20x24 inches (the Polaroid camera, which can be rented on-site for a reasonable fee). The film comes in separate sheets rather than rolls. • Flexible bellows connecting the front and back: they allow the use of a range of focal lengths (with different lenses. there is no zooming in such formats) and focussing distances. • Ground glass viewing: makes it possible to see the image with great accuracy before taking the exposure • Interchangeable lenses: you are not limited to a particular mount.
    [Show full text]