DOCSLIB.ORG

Map 61 Ephesus Compiled by C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Map 61 Ephesus Compiled by C. Foss and G. Reger (islands), 1994 Introduction The continental part of the map comprises three distinct geographic regions: the coasts of Ionia and Caria, the Maeander valley, and the mountainous hinterland of Caria. The coastal region, settled by Greeks in their first great expansion in the Iron Age, became the site of major cities and many smaller settlements along its deeply indented coastline. The excavators of Ephesus and Miletus have long surveyed the regions of those cities, and other classical scholars have investigated the rest of Ionia. The Ionian coast has seen great physical changes since antiquity. The vast quantities of alluvium deposited by the R. Maeander have made the ancient port of Ephesus an inland town, and turned the former Gulf of Latmos near Miletus into a lake (inset and E2). The Carian coast, with its numerous small ports, is well known thanks to the researches of Bean and Fraser. The broad Maeander valley, which divides Ionia from Caria, always played a major role in the economy of the region with its fertility and the communication it provided between coast and interior. It has not been systematically surveyed. The river’s tributaries offered an outlet for the scattered settlements in the basins and plateaus of the heavily forested interior of Caria. Much of this region, as well as many parts of neighboring ones, was carefully explored by Louis Robert. The map omits Carian sites for which no Greek name is attested; for these, see Radt (1970). For unnamed village sites also not marked, see Marchese (1989, 147-54). Islands The Aegean islands here pose difficult problems. The number of poleis (city-states) and other sites is considerable. Ancient sources such as Pliny the Elder and some of the later geographers offer a welter of names. These are often corrupt, and in some instances they can be associated with a specific island only with the greatest hesitation. Research and archaeological exploration have treated the different islands very unevenly. For example, it is still unclear where the main polis site was on Kalymna, whereas the territory of Ialysos on Rhodes (Map 60 G3) has been so thoroughly documented by Papachristodoulou (1989) that only a selection of the sites identified there can be marked at this scale. Future work is sure to improve our knowledge of the topography of many islands. Individual farms (choria) attested by the Diocletianic inventories are omitted both from the map and from the Unlocated Toponyms; most of their locations are in any case not known. Tholaria are also omitted; again, the locations of many remain uncertain. Single graves and small groups of graves are omitted likewise; it is a matter of judgment when “graves” become a “cemetery,” but in general only those that their discoverers or excavators term a necropolis are marked. Sherd scatters discovered in surveys are generally not indicated unless other, more substantial evidence (for example, walls) suggests a settlement. In the same connection note that the rich results of several surveys cannot be reflected at this scale because the areas covered were too small (for example, Erard-Cerceau 1993; Brunet 1988). Towers–such a common feature on the islands–are marked as forts; choice of this symbol, however, is not meant to prejudice views on the purposes of these structures, which continue to be debated. In general, only the relatively well-preserved towers are marked. 938 MAP 61 EPHESUS Directory All place names are in Turkey unless otherwise noted Abbreviations IK 17.1 R. Meriç et al., Die Inschriften von Ephesos VII.1, Bonn, 1981 IK 28 W. Blümel, Die Inschriften von Iasos, Bonn, 1985 IK 30 E. Varinlioglu, Die Inschriften von Keramos, Bonn, 1986 IK 35 W. Blümel, Die Inschriften von Mylasa II, Bonn, 1988 IK 38 W. Blümel, Die Inschriften der rhodischen Peraia, Bonn, 1991 IK 41 W. Blümel, Die Inschriften von Knidos, Bonn, 1992 IPriene F. Hiller von Gaertringen (ed.), Inschriften von Priene, Berlin, 1906 Robert, Hell. L. Robert, Hellenica,13vols.,Paris,1946-65 Robert, OMS L. Robert, Opera Minora Selecta, 7 vols., Amsterdam, 1969-90 TIB Phrygien K. Belke and N. Mersich, Tabula Imperii Byzantini 7, Phrygien und Pisidien,DenkWien211, 1990 Names Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference G2 Acharaka HR Salavatlı PECS C1 Aegaeum Mare See Map 57 E4 Ag. Ioannis ACHR on Nisyros GRE Jacopi 1932 D2 Ag. Ioannis ACHR on Samos GRE Shipley 1987, 254 B4 Aigiale ACHRL Tholaria, on Amorgos RE 1 GRE D3 Akrite Ins. Arkoi GRE RE A5 Akrotiri AH on Thera GRE Sperling 1973, 11-12 F2 Alabanda/ CHRL/ Araphisar RE Antiocheia Chrysaoron H Robert 1973, 448-66 F2 Alinda/ CHRL/ Karpuzlu PECS Alexandria ad Latmum H F1 Almoura R Eskioba IK 17.1, 187 D3 Amazonion Pr. Geranos, Patmos GRE RE Patmos, col. 2179 G4 *Amnista H Sögüt Bean 1957, 61 B4 Amorgos Ins. Amorgos GRE RE G4 Amos CHR Hisarburnu IK 38.95 D2 Ampelos M. Karbounis, on Samos Shipley 1987, 279 GRE D2 Ampelos Pr. Aspro Kabo GRE Shipley 1987, 279 F3 Amynanda C Alakilise? Bean 1955, 165 F2 Amyzon/ HRL/ Mazın Kalesi RE *Mydon C ATL I, 521 E2 Anaia CHRL? Kadikalesi Müller-Wiener 1961, 66 B5 Anaphe ACHRL Kastelli GRE Hiller 1899, 351-58 B5 Anaphe Ins. Anaphe GRE RE G2 Anineta RL Bögdelik Robert 1980, 325-34 E1 Anokome L near Kozpınar Foss 1979, 56 (n. 20) E4 Antimachia ACHRL Antimakhia, on Kos GRE Herzog 1899, 165-66 H2 Antiochia ad Maeandrum HRL Aliagaçiftligi See Map 65 Antiocheia Chrysaoron = Alabanda B4 Anydros? Ins. R Amorgopoulo GRE RE G4 Apeiros H region N and W of Fraser 1954, 68-69 Physkos F4 Aphrodisias Pr. R Boz Burun Fraser 1954, 63 Aphrodite?, T. = Eileithyaia, T. A3 Aplomata L on Naxos GRE Orlandos 1976, 154-57 MAP 61 EPHESUS 939 Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference Apollo,T.= Asklepieion, T. B5 Apollo Asgelatos, T. ACHR on Anaphe GRE Hiller 1899, 352-53 D3 Apollo Lepsios, T. ACHR on Lepsia GRE Bean 1957, 136 A3 Apollo, T. ACHR on Delos GRE Bruneau 1983, 19-60 D4 Apollo, T. ACHR Khristos Ierusalem, on Newton 1865 I, 304-12 Kalymna GRE B3 Apollonas AC on Naxos GRE Sauer 1892, 46 (no. 47-48) A3 Apollonion H on Mykonos GRE Svoronos 1893, 487 Aquae See Aqueducts E3 Ar(ai)ai Inss. RE Arai A3 Archilocheion?, T. ACHR Elitas, on Paros GRE Berranger 1992, 108-12 C2 Arethousa C on Ikaria GRE Zapheiropoulos 1963, 273 D2 Arethousa? spring, on Samos GRE Shipley 1987, 279 D3 Argiai Inss. Strongili and Airilousa RE Hyetussa GRE E4 Argos H?R?L? Stauros, on Nisyros GRE Bean 1957, 119 B4 Arkesine ACHRL on Amorgos GRE Rougemont 1993 E4 Arkonnesos Ins. R Kara Ada RE 1 Arkonnesos Ins. = Aspis Ins. C4 Armenokhori ACH on Astypalaia GRE Hope Simpson 1973, 161-62 G2 Aroma R Kavaklı von Diest 1913, 28 Arsinoe(ia) = Ephesus D3 Artemis Parthenos, T. ACHR on Leros GRE Bean 1957, 134 C2 Artemis Tauropolos, T. ACHR on Ikaria GRE Polites 1939; Papalas 1983 A3 Artemision CH on Rheneia GRE Charre 1993, 133-42 A5 Ascania Ins. Christiana GRE Pliny, NH 4.71 E1 *Asia A lower Cayster valley Kirk 1985, 164 E4 Asklepieion, T. CHR on Kos GRE Herzog 1932 A3 Asklepieion, ACHR on Paros GRE Berranger 1992, 90-93, 104-105 Thesmophorion?, Apollo, T. Asklepieis = Therma E4 Aspat H fortified site Foss 1988, 161 D1 Aspis/ R Doganbey Adası RE Arkonnesos 2 Arkonnesos Ins. D4 Aspripetra AC on Kos GRE Levi 1925 G3 Astragon H Elmacık? Marchese 1986, 237 C4 Astypalaia ACHRL on Astypalaia GRE Hope Simpson 1973, 159-61 C4 Astypalaia Ins. Astypalaia GRE RE D2 Astypalaia M. on Samos GRE Shipley 1987, 279 E3 Astypalaia Pr. R Kızıl Burun Bean 1955, 162 D4 Astypalaia/ ACHRL on Kos GRE Bean 1957, 122-23 Isthmos A3 Athena Poliouchos, T. C on Naxos GRE IG 12.5.41 A5 Athena, Zeus?, T. CHR on Thera GRE Sperling 1973, 35-37 Athymbra=Nysa G4 Aulai CR near Orhaniye IK 38.118 A3 Aulon H on Naxos GRE RE Naxos, col. 2082 Aurelia Neapolis = Neapolis Automate Ins. = Hiera Ins. G2 Bargasa HR Haydere PECS Bargasa = Pargasa F3 Bargylia CHRL Varvıl RE Bargylietikos Sinus = Iasi(k)os Sinus E3 Basilicus Sinus R Akbük Limanı RE E4 Bathos H on Kalymna GRE Koukoule 1982, 56-57 E2 Batinetis H opposite Samos RE Samos, col. 2182 E1 Belevi ACH mausoleum, tumulus Praschniker 1979, 170-71 940 MAP 61 EPHESUS Grid Name Period Modern Name / Location Reference E1 Belevi A? quarries Praschniker 1979, 169 E1 *Boneita R Küçükkale IK 17.1, 165 E4 Bourina H spring on Kos GRE Gow 1950, 133 Branchidai = Didyma D3 Brouzi H on Leros GRE Benson 1963, 9 G4 Bubasius Sinus R Hisarönü Bay Fraser 1954, 62-63 G4 Bybassos CHR Hisarönü district Fraser 1954, 63-65 F2 Caria ACHRL region S R. Maeander KlPauly Karer E1 Cayster fl. See Map 56 G3 ‘Cedreaticum’ Sinus R Gökova Körfezi Bean 1957, 63 F5 Chalke CHR GRE See Map 60 F5 Chalke Ins. Chalke GRE See Map 60 F3 Chalketor CH Karakuyu IK 35, 107-13 E4 Chelone Pr. on Kos GRE Bean 1957, 126 G4 Chersonesos CHR Daraçya Fraser 1954, 65-67 D2 Chesios fl. on Samos GRE Shipley 1987, 290 G2 Chrysaoras fl. R? Mastavra Dere RE G3 Chrysaoris C Şahinler? Marchese 1986, 97 E4 Cnidus HRL Tekir RE 1 F4 Cnidus AC Burgaz? IK 41.1-2 E1 Colophon AC Degirmendere RE Kolophon 2 E1 Colophon/ HRL/ S of earlier foundation RE Notion 1 Colophon ad Mare/ H/ Notion ACHR A5 Columbus C? on Thera GRE Della Setta 1924 D4 Cordylusa Ins.
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
  • Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle

    Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle

    INDEX Abd-Hadad, priest-king, Akkaron/Ekron, , Abila, , , , Akko, Ake, , , , Abydos, , see also Ptolemaic-Ake Actium, battle, , Alexander III the Great, Macedonian Adaios, ruler of Kypsela, king, –, , , Adakhalamani, Nubian king, and Syria, –, –, , , , Adulis, , –, Aegean Sea, , , , , , –, and Egypt, , , –, , –, – empire of, , , , , , –, legacy of, – –, –, , , death, burial, – Aemilius Paullus, L., cult of, , , Aeropos, Ptolemaic commander, Alexander IV, , , Alexander I Balas, Seleukid king, Afrin, river, , , –, – Agathokleia, mistress of Ptolemy IV, and eastern policy, , and Demetrios II, Agathokles of Syracuse, , –, and Seventh Syrian War, –, , , Agathokles, son of Lysimachos, – death, , , , Alexander II Zabeinas, , , Agathokles, adviser of Ptolemy IV, –, , , –, Alexander Iannai, Judaean king, Aigai, Macedon, , – Ainos, Thrace, , , , Alexander, son of Krateros, , Aitolian League, Aitolians, , , Alexander, satrap of Persis, , , –, , , – Alexandria-by-Egypt, , , , , , , , , , , , , Aitos, son of Apollonios, , , –, , , Akhaian League, , , , , , , –, , , , , , , , , , , , , , Akhaios, son of Seleukos I, , , –, –, , – , , , , , , –, , , , Akhaios, son of Andromachos, , and Sixth Syrian War, –, adviser of Antiochos III, , – Alexandreia Troas, , conquers Asia Minor, – Alexandros, son of Andromachos, king, –, , , –, , , –, , , Alketas, , , Amanus, mountains, , –, index Amathos, Cyprus, and battle of Andros, , , Amathos, transjordan, , Amestris, wife of Lysimachos, , death, Ammonias, Egypt,
  • Bibliography

    Bibliography

    Bibliography Many books were read and researched in the compilation of Binford, L. R, 1983, Working at Archaeology. Academic Press, The Encyclopedic Dictionary of Archaeology: New York. Binford, L. R, and Binford, S. R (eds.), 1968, New Perspectives in American Museum of Natural History, 1993, The First Humans. Archaeology. Aldine, Chicago. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Braidwood, R 1.,1960, Archaeologists and What They Do. Franklin American Museum of Natural History, 1993, People of the Stone Watts, New York. Age. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Branigan, Keith (ed.), 1982, The Atlas ofArchaeology. St. Martin's, American Museum of Natural History, 1994, New World and Pacific New York. Civilizations. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Bray, w., and Tump, D., 1972, Penguin Dictionary ofArchaeology. American Museum of Natural History, 1994, Old World Civiliza­ Penguin, New York. tions. HarperSanFrancisco, San Francisco. Brennan, L., 1973, Beginner's Guide to Archaeology. Stackpole Ashmore, w., and Sharer, R. J., 1988, Discovering Our Past: A Brief Books, Harrisburg, PA. Introduction to Archaeology. Mayfield, Mountain View, CA. Broderick, M., and Morton, A. A., 1924, A Concise Dictionary of Atkinson, R J. C., 1985, Field Archaeology, 2d ed. Hyperion, New Egyptian Archaeology. Ares Publishers, Chicago. York. Brothwell, D., 1963, Digging Up Bones: The Excavation, Treatment Bacon, E. (ed.), 1976, The Great Archaeologists. Bobbs-Merrill, and Study ofHuman Skeletal Remains. British Museum, London. New York. Brothwell, D., and Higgs, E. (eds.), 1969, Science in Archaeology, Bahn, P., 1993, Collins Dictionary of Archaeology. ABC-CLIO, 2d ed. Thames and Hudson, London. Santa Barbara, CA. Budge, E. A. Wallis, 1929, The Rosetta Stone. Dover, New York. Bahn, P.
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 01:02:10PM Via Free Access 332 Chapter 6

    Downloaded from Brill.Com10/07/2021 01:02:10PM Via Free Access 332 Chapter 6

    chapter 6 Building Urban Community on the Margins: Stratonikeia and the Sanctuary of Zeus at Panamara While Lagina was a local shrine that grew and expanded with Stratonikeia to become its religious center, the sanctuary of Zeus Karios at Panamara was already recognized as an important regional cult center in southern Karia.1 However, it, too, was gradually drawn into the orbit of Stratonikeia to become the next major urban sanctuary of the polis. This case study explores yet another kind of dynamic in the transition to polis sanctuary, one that entailed a major lateral shift in scope for Panamara, from the wider region of southern Karia with diverse communities towards the urban center in the north and its demographic base (Figure 6.1, and Figure 5.1 above). Through an examination of this transition it will become apparent how Stratonikeia came to replace, or absorb, the administering body of the sanctuary, but also how Panamara was used to achieve the same kinds of goals of the emerging polis as was Lagina: territorial integrity, social cohesion, and global recognition, albeit in a different way. Panamara and its environment have unfortunately not been subject to the same systematic archaeological investigations as Lagina, and much of the orig- inal landscape in the area has already been lost in the exploitation of lignite, or brown coal, through strip-mining. Our sources for this sanctuary and its envi- ronment are therefore severely limited, especially with regard to architecture and processional routes. Fortunately, however, the communities involved with the sanctuary at Panamara left hundreds of inscriptions behind that provide valuable insights into the way in which the sanctuary and cult of Zeus Karios were gradually realigned to meet the needs of Stratonikeia.
  • Multi-Sensor SAR Geodetic Imaging and Modelling of Santorini Volcano

    Multi-Sensor SAR Geodetic Imaging and Modelling of Santorini Volcano

    Multi-Sensor SAR Geodetic Imaging and Modelling of Santorini Volcano Post-Unrest Response Elena Papageorgiou, Michael Foumelis, Elisa Trasatti, Guido Ventura, Daniel Raucoules, Antonios Mouratidis To cite this version: Elena Papageorgiou, Michael Foumelis, Elisa Trasatti, Guido Ventura, Daniel Raucoules, et al.. Multi- Sensor SAR Geodetic Imaging and Modelling of Santorini Volcano Post-Unrest Response. Remote Sensing, MDPI, 2019, 11, 10.3390/rs11030259. hal-02380702 HAL Id: hal-02380702 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02380702 Submitted on 28 Nov 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. remote sensing Article Multi-Sensor SAR Geodetic Imaging and Modelling of Santorini Volcano Post-Unrest Response Elena Papageorgiou 1, Michael Foumelis 2,*, Elisa Trasatti 3 , Guido Ventura 3 , Daniel Raucoules 2 and Antonios Mouratidis 1 1 School of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (AUTh), 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece; [email protected] (E.P.); [email protected] (A.M.) 2 BRGM—French Geological Survey, 3 Claude-Guillemin, 45060 Orléans, France; [email protected] 3 Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), 605 Via di Vigna Murata, 00143 Roma, Italy; [email protected] (E.T.); [email protected] (G.V.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +33-023-868-3226 Received: 25 December 2018; Accepted: 24 January 2019; Published: 28 January 2019 Abstract: Volcanic history of Santorini over recent years records a seismo-volcanic unrest in 2011–12 with a non-eruptive behavior.
  • Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021

    Greece • Crete • Turkey May 28 - June 22, 2021

    GREECE • CRETE • TURKEY MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 Tour Hosts: Dr. Scott Moore Dr. Jason Whitlark organized by GREECE - CRETE - TURKEY / May 28 - June 22, 2021 May 31 Mon ATHENS - CORINTH CANAL - CORINTH – ACROCORINTH - NAFPLION At 8:30a.m. depart from Athens and drive along the coastal highway of Saronic Gulf. Arrive at the Corinth Canal for a brief stop and then continue on to the Acropolis of Corinth. Acro-corinth is the citadel of Corinth. It is situated to the southwest of the ancient city and rises to an elevation of 1883 ft. [574 m.]. Today it is surrounded by walls that are about 1.85 mi. [3 km.] long. The foundations of the fortifications are ancient—going back to the Hellenistic Period. The current walls were built and rebuilt by the Byzantines, Franks, Venetians, and Ottoman Turks. Climb up and visit the fortress. Then proceed to the Ancient city of Corinth. It was to this megalopolis where the apostle Paul came and worked, established a thriving church, subsequently sending two of his epistles now part of the New Testament. Here, we see all of the sites associated with his ministry: the Agora, the Temple of Apollo, the Roman Odeon, the Bema and Gallio’s Seat. The small local archaeological museum here is an absolute must! In Romans 16:23 Paul mentions his friend Erastus and • • we will see an inscription to him at the site. In the afternoon we will drive to GREECE CRETE TURKEY Nafplion for check-in at hotel followed by dinner and overnight. (B,D) MAY 28 - JUNE 22, 2021 June 1 Tue EPIDAURAUS - MYCENAE - NAFPLION Morning visit to Mycenae where we see the remains of the prehistoric citadel Parthenon, fortified with the Cyclopean Walls, the Lionesses’ Gate, the remains of the Athens Mycenaean Palace and the Tomb of King Agamemnon in which we will actually enter.
  • Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool

    Ptolemaic Foundations in Asia Minor and the Aegean As the Lagids’ Political Tool

    ELECTRUM * Vol. 20 (2013): 57–76 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.13.004.1433 PTOLEMAIC FOUNDATIONS IN ASIA MINOR AND THE AEGEAN AS THE LAGIDS’ POLITICAL TOOL Tomasz Grabowski Uniwersytet Jagielloński, Kraków Abstract: The Ptolemaic colonisation in Asia Minor and the Aegean region was a signifi cant tool which served the politics of the dynasty that actively participated in the fi ght for hegemony over the eastern part of the Mediterranean Sea basin. In order to specify the role which the settlements founded by the Lagids played in their politics, it is of considerable importance to establish as precise dating of the foundations as possible. It seems legitimate to acknowledge that Ptolemy II possessed a well-thought-out plan, which, apart from the purely strategic aspects of founding new settlements, was also heavily charged with the propaganda issues which were connected with the cult of Arsinoe II. Key words: Ptolemies, foundations, Asia Minor, Aegean. Settlement of new cities was a signifi cant tool used by the Hellenistic kings to achieve various goals: political and economic. The process of colonisation was begun by Alex- ander the Great, who settled several cities which were named Alexandrias after him. The process was successfully continued by the diadochs, and subsequently by the follow- ing rulers of the monarchies which emerged after the demise of Alexander’s state. The new settlements were established not only by the representatives of the most powerful dynasties: the Seleucids, the Ptolemies and the Antigonids, but also by the rulers of the smaller states. The kings of Pergamum of the Attalid dynasty were considerably active in this fi eld, but the rulers of Bithynia, Pontus and Cappadocia were also successful in this process.1 Very few regions of the time remained beyond the colonisation activity of the Hellenistic kings.
  • EA Index1-44

    EA Index1-44

    EPIGRAPHICA ANATOLICA Zeitschrift für Epigraphik und historische Geographie Anatoliens Autoren- und Titelverzeichnis 1 (1983) – 44 (2011) Adak, M., Claudia Anassa – eine Wohltäterin aus Patara. EA 27 (1996) 127–142 – Epigraphische Mitteilungen aus Antalya VII: Eine Bauinschrift aus Nikaia. EA 33 (2001) 175–177 Adak, M. – Atvur, O., Das Grabhaus des Zosimas und der Schiffseigner Eudemos aus Olympos in Lykien. EA 28 (1997) 11–31 – Epigraphische Mitteilungen aus Antalya II: Die pamphylische Hafenstadt Magydos. EA 31 (1999) 53–68 Akar Tanrıver, D., A Recently Discovered Cybele Relief at Thermae Theseos. EA 43 (2010) 53–56 Akar Tanrıver, D. – Akıncı Öztürk, E., Two New Inscriptions from Laodicea on the Lycos. EA 43 (2010) 50–52 Akat, S., Three Inscriptions from Miletos. EA 38 (2005) 53–54 – A New Ephebic List from Iasos. EA 42 (2009) 78–80 Akat, S. – Ricl, M., A New Honorary Inscription for Cn. Vergilius Capito from Miletos. EA 40 (2007) 29–32 Akbıyıkoğlu, K. – Hauken, T. – Tanrıver, C., A New Inscription from Phrygia. A Rescript of Septimius Severus and Caracalla to the coloni of the Imperial Estate at Tymion. EA 36 (2003) 33–44 Akdoğu Arca, E., Epigraphische Mitteilungen aus Antalya III: Inschriften aus Lykaonien im Museum von Side. EA 31 (1999) 69–71 Akıncı, E. – Aytaçlar, P. Ö., A List of Female Names from Laodicea on the Lycos. EA 39 (2006) 113– 116 Akıncı Öztürk, E. – Akar Tanrıver, D., Two New Inscriptions from Laodicea on the Lycos. EA 43 (2010) 50–52 Akıncı Öztürk, E. – Tanrıver, C., New Katagraphai and Dedications from the Sanctuary of Apollon Lairbenos.
  • "On the Relations of Canaanite Exploration to Pre-Historic Classic

    "On the Relations of Canaanite Exploration to Pre-Historic Classic

    176 ON THE RELATIONS OF CANAANITE EXPLORATION These inecriptions, and the bas-reliefs on the monument called Kamna Hurmill, in Crelo-Syria, near the source of the Orontes, and possibly of the same pe1·iod, are an enigma, as yet, to the most learned Orientaliots. It is to be hoped, however, now that attention is again called to the subject, that the clue may be found that shall unlock their meaning, and that Northern 8yI"ia will be no longer overlooked by tho explorer. DISCOVERY AT THE l\IOSQUE EL AKS.A, JERUSALEM.-llo A DISCOVERY of considerable interest has been made in this :Mosque by the Rev. J. Neil, who has only recently gone to Jerusalem for the Society for the Conversion of the Jews. "In the Mosque of El Aksa," he writes, "you will remember that there is a long plain room opening out at the south-east angle, called the Mosque of Omar, in which the only object of interest whatever is a recess supported by two twisted pillars, and called the Mihrab, or Praying-place of Omar. You may, perhaps, remember that the pillars on each side of this recess, of Solomonic twisted pattern and polished marble, appear to have been turned upside down, and to have their capitals of greyish stone in broken leaf-like patterns below. On vi~iting this the day before yesterday, July 5th, I discovered that a great part of the yellowish plaster had been removed from the top of these pillars, and that rich grotesquely carved capitals were exposed to view in an admirable state of preserva­ tion.
  • A West-East Traverse Along the Magmatism of the South Aegean Volcanic Arc in the Light of Volcanological, Chemical and Isotope Data

    A West-East Traverse Along the Magmatism of the South Aegean Volcanic Arc in the Light of Volcanological, Chemical and Isotope Data

    65 A West-East Traverse along the magmatism of the south Aegean volcanic arc in the light of volcanological, chemical and isotope data L. Francalanci1,2,∗, G.E. Vougioukalakis 3, G. Perini1, P. Manetti1,2 1 Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Università degli Studi di Firenze, via La Pira, 4, I-50121, Firenze, Italy. 2 C.N.R., I.G.G., Sezione di Firenze, via La Pira 4, I-50121, Firenze, Italy. 3 I.G.M.E, Mesogeion, 70, Athens, Greece. ABSTRACT The volcanic rocks of the South Aegean arc (SAAVA) form a chain from the Gulf of Saronikos (Susaki, Egina, Poros, Methana) at West, to an area close to the Anatolian coast at East (Kos, Nisyros and minor islands), through the central part (Milos and Santorini island groups). The volcanic activity began in the Lower Pliocene at Egina (4.7 Ma) and lasted until present days, with the still active Methana, Milos, Santorini and Nisyros volcanoes. The beginning of volcanism is younger in the central sector of the arc. Volcanic center location was controlled by large tectonic lineaments, most of them still active, trending E-W to NW-SE for the western part and mainly NE-SW for the central and eastern parts of the arc. Volcanic fields developed along ellipse shaped areas with the longest axis oriented perpendicular to the subduction front. In the western volcanic fields (Susaki, Egina-Poros-Methana and Milos), volcanic centers are mostly monogenetic and no composite volcanic structures are present. In the eastern sector of the arc, Santorini and Nisyros are important composite volcanoes with caldera structures.
  • Memoria De Investigación De 2005

    Memoria De Investigación De 2005

    MERCEDES CALVO CRUZ MEMORIA DE INVESTIGACIÓN 2005 UNIVERSIDAD DE LAS PALMAS DE GRAN CANARIA Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación SERVICIO DE PUBLICACIONES © Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Desarrollo e Innovación de la Universidad de las Palmas de Gran Canaria [email protected] Servicio de Publicaciones y Producción Documental [email protected] D.L.: G.C. 827-2005 1ª edición: 2006 Imprime: Talleres Editoriales COMETA, S.A. Ctra. Castellón, Km. 3,400 50013 Zaragoza Impreso en España – Printed in Spain El presente documento está basado en la información aportada por los investigadores y no posee ningún valor de certificación. Índice Presentación ................................................................................................................ 7 Análisis Económico Aplicado ...................................................................................... 9 Arte, Ciudad y Territorio ............................................................................................ 23 Biología ...................................................................................................................... 31 Bioquímica y Biología Molecular, Fisiología, Genética e Inmunología........................ 41 Cartografía y Expresión Gráfica en la Ingeniería ........................................................ 47 Ciencias Clínicas ........................................................................................................ 49 Ciencias Históricas .....................................................................................................
  • Plinio El Viejo

    Plinio El Viejo

    PLINIO EL VIEJO HISTORIA NATURAL LIBROS III-VI Traducción: AA. VV. Las traducciones y notas han sido llevadas a cabo por Antonio Fontán (Libro III), Ignacio García Arribas (Libro IV), Encarnación del Barrio Sanz (Libro V), Mª Luisa Arribas Hernáez (Libro VI) Coordinadora: Ana Mª Morue Casas Asesores para la sección latina: José Javier Iso y José Luis Moralejo Revisión: Luis Alfonso Hernández Miguel y Francisco Manzanero Cano. Biblioteca Clásica Gredos - 250 TÍTULO original: Naturalis Historia Plinio el Viejo, 77 IR AL INDICE LIBRO III [*] Hasta aquí la situación y las maravillas de la tierra y de las aguas, así como las de los astros y el plan del universo y sus dimensiones. Ahora se han de enumerar sus partes. Aunque se piense que esto es también una empresa interminable y que no ha de tratarse a la ligera sin ser objeto de una cierta crítica, en ninguna clase de asuntos es más justa la indulgencia, salvo que se tenga por extraño que uno que ha nacido hombre no posea todos los conocimientos humanos. Por eso, no seguiré a ningún autor en particular, sino en cada sección al que considere más fiable, ya que ha sido común en casi todos explicar con mayor diligencia los lugares desde los que estaban escribiendo. No rechazaré, por tanto, ni criticaré a ninguno. Se pondrán los escuetos nombres de los lugares y con toda la brevedad que se me alcance, dejando su notoriedad y las causas de ella para las secciones correspondientes. Porque ahora mi discurso trata del universo entero. Por eso yo querría que se entienda que se enuncian los nombres como si no tuvieran fama, tal cual fueron al principio, antes de la historia, y que el resultado sea una especie de nomenclátor.