DOCSLIB.ORG

AI Watch National Strategies on Artificial Intelligence a European Perspective in 2019

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AI Watch National Strategies on Artificial Intelligence a European Perspective in 2019 J R C TECHNICAL REPORT AI Watch National strategies on Artificial Intelligence A European perspective in 2019 EUR 30102 EN This publication is a Technical report by the Joint Research Centre (JRC), the European Commission’s science and knowledge service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policymaking process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use that might be made of this publication. For information on the methodology and quality underlying the data used in this publication for which the source is neither Eurostat nor other Commission services, users should contact the referenced source. The designations employed and the presentation of material on the maps do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the European Union concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Contact information Name: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (Seville) Address: Calle Inca Garcilaso 3, 41092 Seville (Spain) Email: [email protected] EU Science Hub https://ec.europa.eu/jrc JRC119974 EUR 30102 EN PDF ISBN 978-92-76-16409-8 ISSN 1831-9424 doi:10.2760/602843 Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2020 © European Union, 2020 The reuse policy of the European Commission is implemented by the Commission Decision 2011/833/EU of 12 December 2011 on the reuse of Commission documents (OJ L 330, 14.12.2011, p. 39). Except otherwise noted, the reuse of this document is authorised under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). This means that reuse is allowed provided appropriate credit is given and any changes are indicated. For any use or reproduction of photos or other material that is not owned by the EU, permission must be sought directly from the copyright holders. All content © European Union 2020 How to cite this report: Vincent Van Roy, AI Watch - National strategies on Artificial Intelligence: A European perspective in 2019, EUR 30102 EN, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2020, ISBN 978-92-76-16409-8, doi:10.2760/602843, JRC119974. Contents Foreword ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 5 1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 2 Overview of national AI strategies ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 8 3 Methodology .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 9 4 Austria ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 11 5 Belgium ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 6 Bulgaria ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 17 7 Croatia .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 18 8 Cyprus ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19 9 Czech Republic .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 22 10 Denmark ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26 11 Estonia .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 30 12 Finland .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 32 13 France .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 36 14 Germany ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 40 15 Greece ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 44 16 Hungary ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 45 17 Ireland ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 46 18 Italy...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 47 19 Latvia ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 49 20 Lithuania ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 51 21 Luxembourg ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 53 22 Malta ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 55 23 Netherlands ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 59 24 Poland ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 61 25 Portugal ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Artificial Intelligence: with Great Power Comes Great Responsibility
    ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT RESPONSIBILITY JOINT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY & SUBCOMMITTEE ON ENERGY COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 26, 2018 Serial No. 115–67 Printed for the use of the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://science.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 30–877PDF WASHINGTON : 2018 COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE, SPACE, AND TECHNOLOGY HON. LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas DANA ROHRABACHER, California ZOE LOFGREN, California MO BROOKS, Alabama DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon BILL POSEY, Florida AMI BERA, California THOMAS MASSIE, Kentucky ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut RANDY K. WEBER, Texas MARC A. VEASEY, Texas STEPHEN KNIGHT, California DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia BRIAN BABIN, Texas JACKY ROSEN, Nevada BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia CONOR LAMB, Pennsylvania BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia JERRY MCNERNEY, California RALPH LEE ABRAHAM, Louisiana ED PERLMUTTER, Colorado GARY PALMER, Alabama PAUL TONKO, New York DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida BILL FOSTER, Illinois ANDY BIGGS, Arizona MARK TAKANO, California ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas COLLEEN HANABUSA, Hawaii NEAL P. DUNN, Florida CHARLIE CRIST, Florida CLAY HIGGINS, Louisiana RALPH NORMAN, South Carolina DEBBIE LESKO, Arizona SUBCOMMITTEE ON RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY HON. BARBARA COMSTOCK, Virginia, Chair FRANK D. LUCAS, Oklahoma DANIEL LIPINSKI, Illinois RANDY HULTGREN, Illinois ELIZABETH H. ESTY, Connecticut STEPHEN KNIGHT, California JACKY ROSEN, Nevada BARRY LOUDERMILK, Georgia SUZANNE BONAMICI, Oregon DANIEL WEBSTER, Florida AMI BERA, California ROGER W. MARSHALL, Kansas DONALD S. BEYER, JR., Virginia DEBBIE LESKO, Arizona EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON, Texas LAMAR S.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Spiritus Ex Machina: the Rights of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence by 2050 Research Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment
    1 Spiritus Ex Machina: The Rights of Autonomous Artificial Intelligence by 2050 Research Thesis Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for graduation with research distinction in History in the undergraduate colleges of The Ohio State University by Benjamin Harvey The Ohio State University May 2018 Project Advisor: Professor David Staley, Department of History 2 “Change is the law of life. And those who look only to the past or present are certain to miss the future.” - John F. Kennedy The future has not happened yet. That is a fact of time that is indisputable. However, the present, from which the future is derived, is currently occurring. The study of the now, the past of the future, if you will, is an opportunity for a historian to project future scenarios one, five, ten, or more years from now. My thesis will examine the timeframe in and around the year 2050, in the context of Artificial Intelligence and their rights and human relations. I will be examining current events and past events and projecting their impact on scenarios. There have been various ways of looking at the progressions of time. The ancients thought of it as a circle, later, some religions called it a predetermined line, or a little less predetermined line, the popular BBC series Doctor Who would have you believe that it is a ball, and others, the post-modernist historians who have lent their powers to the rise of futurism, see it more as a growing tree, with the trunk being what we call the present, and the branches being the many scenarios that could occur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ai Revolution
    Master’s Thesis 30 credits Department of Informatics and Media Spring Semester of 2018 Date of submission: 2018-05-28 THE AI REVOLUTION A study on the present and future application and value of AI in the context of ERP systems Jacob Bergdahl Abstract Business leaders around the world are expressing equal amounts of excitement and urgency for implementing artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. Yet the upcoming AI revolution is clouded with uncertainties and misconceptions. In this thesis, the business value and application potential of AI were studied in a context of enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems through a case study at a consultancy firm with small- to midsize clients. Three research questions were posed and answered: how can, or do, organizational processes covered by ERP systems benefit from AI, what AI features do customers typically request when ordering ERP systems, and is AI adopted with the purpose of reducing costs or increasing revenue? Using a framework for data analysis, multiple organizational processes covered by ERP systems were explored through interviews with ERP experts. The results indicated that small- and midsize companies were still primarily requesting and working to implement basic, incremental AI with the purpose of reducing costs through automations. Future leaders may instead need to implement AI that fundamentally reinvents their business processes, with the purpose of increasing revenue through augmentations. Overall, while some organizational processes have already been improved with AI solutions, many processes have yet to be AI- powered in the ERP solutions sold by the consultancy firm examined in this study. However, the consultants of the firm express great positivity for the untapped potential of AI, and many further AI solutions are being developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Artificial Intelligence Diplomacy
    STUDY Requested by the AIDA committee Artificial Intelligence diplomacy Artificial Intelligence governance as a new European Union external policy tool Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies Directorate-General for Internal Policies Author: Ulrike3 FRANKE EN PE 662.926 – June 2021 Artificial Intelligence diplomacy Artificial Intelligence governance as a new European Union external policy tool Abstract Artificial Intelligence (AI) has become a tool of power politics, and an element of state diplomacy. The European Union (EU), however, approaches AI primarily from an economic, social, and regulatory angle. This paper discusses the way that AI impacts the European Union’s geopolitical power and its relationship with other countries. It presents possible scenarios for how AI may change the international balance of power and recommends ways for the EU and its Member States to respond. This document was provided by the Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies at the request of the special committee on Artificial Intelligence in a Digital Age (AIDA). This document was requested by the European Parliament's special committee on Artificial Intelligence in a Digital Age. AUTHOR Ulrike FRANKE, European Council on Foreign Relations ADMINISTRATORS RESPONSIBLE Matteo CIUCCI Frédéric GOUARDÈRES EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Catherine NAAS LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies
    [Show full text]
  • Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and Its Use in the Public Sector
    Hello, World: Artificial intelligence and its use in the public sector Jamie Berryhill Kévin Kok Heang Rob Clogher Keegan McBride November 2019 | http://oe.cd/helloworld OECD Working Papers on Public Governance No. 36 Cover images are the European Parliament and the dome of Germany’s Reichstag building processed through Deep Learning algorithms to match the style of Van Gogh paintings. tw Hello, World: Artificial Intelligence and its Use in the Public Sector Authors: Jamie Berryhill, Kévin Kok Heang, Rob Clogher, Keegan McBride PUBE 2 This document and any map included herein are without prejudice to the status of or sovereignty over any territory, to the delimitation of international frontiers and boundaries and to the name of any territory, city or area. 1. Note by Tukey: The information in this document with reference to ‘Cyprus’ relates to the southern part of the island. There is no single authority representing both Turkish and Greek Cypriot people on the island. Turkey recognises the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (TRNC). Until a lasting and equitable solution is found within the context of the United Nations, Turkey shall preserve its position concerning the ‘Cyprus issue’. 2. Note by all the European Union Member States of the OECD and the European Commission: The Republic of Cyprus is recognised by all members of the United Nations with the exception of Turkey. The information in this document relates to the area under the effective control of the Government of the Republic of Cyprus. HELLO, WORLD: ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND ITS USE IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR © OECD 2019 3 Foreword Artificial Intelligence (AI) is an area of research and technology application that can have a significant impact on public policies and services in many ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability
    STUDY Requested.z by the JURI committee Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability Legal Affairs Policy Department for Citizens' Rights and Constitutional Affairs Directorate-General for Internal Policies PE 621.926 - July 2020 EN Artificial Intelligence and Civil Liability Legal Affairs Abstract This study – commissioned by the Policy Department C at the request of the Committee on Legal Affairs – analyses the notion of AI-technologies and the applicable legal framework for civil liability. It demonstrates how technology regulation should be technology- specific, and presents a Risk Management Approach, where the party who is best capable of controlling and managing a technology-related risk is held strictly liable, as a single entry point for litigation. It then applies such approach to four case-studies, to elaborate recommendations. This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Legal Affairs. AUTHORS Andrea BERTOLINI, Ph.D., LL.M. (Yale) Assistant Professor of Private Law, Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna (Pisa) Director of the Jean Monnet - European Centre of Excellence on the Regulation of Robotics and AI (EURA) www.eura.santannapisa.it [email protected] ADMINISTRATOR RESPONSIBLE Giorgio MUSSA EDITORIAL ASSISTANT Sandrina MARCUZZO LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR Policy departments provide in-house and external expertise to support EP committees and other parliamentary bodies in shaping legislation and exercising democratic scrutiny over EU internal policies. To contact the Policy
    [Show full text]
  • Global Solutions Vs. Local Solutions for the AI Safety Problem
    big data and cognitive computing Article Global Solutions vs. Local Solutions for the AI Safety Problem Alexey Turchin 1,* , David Denkenberger 2 and Brian Patrick Green 3 1 Science for Life Extension Foundation, Prospect Mira 124-15, Moscow 129164, Russia 2 Alliance to Feed the Earth in Disasters (ALLFED), University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK 99775, USA; [email protected] 3 Markkula Center for Applied Ethics, Santa Clara University, Santa Clara, CA 95053, USA; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 16 December 2018; Accepted: 15 February 2019; Published: 20 February 2019 Abstract: There are two types of artificial general intelligence (AGI) safety solutions: global and local. Most previously suggested solutions are local: they explain how to align or “box” a specific AI (Artificial Intelligence), but do not explain how to prevent the creation of dangerous AI in other places. Global solutions are those that ensure any AI on Earth is not dangerous. The number of suggested global solutions is much smaller than the number of proposed local solutions. Global solutions can be divided into four groups: 1. No AI: AGI technology is banned or its use is otherwise prevented; 2. One AI: the first superintelligent AI is used to prevent the creation of any others; 3. Net of AIs as AI police: a balance is created between many AIs, so they evolve as a net and can prevent any rogue AI from taking over the world; 4. Humans inside AI: humans are augmented or part of AI. We explore many ideas, both old and new, regarding global solutions for AI safety.
    [Show full text]
  • Commission of the Bishop´S Conferences of the European Union
    Commission of the Bishop´s Conferences of the European Union June 2020 Annex to the public consultation on the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence – A European Approach COMECE welcomes the general approach of the White Paper on Artificial Intelligence to establish a solid European approach of Artificial Intelligence (AI) grounded in values and fundamental rights as human dignity and privacy protection. It is important to underline the human-centric approach of AI in the EU .AI has to serve the common good. AI has to serve the lives of all human beings. It has to be considered that human life not only has a personal dimension but also a community dimension - community in its human, universal dimension. Clear definition of AI COMECE calls for a clarification of the term “Artificial Intelligence”. Artificial Intelligence must be clearly differentiated from human conduct. The Christian perspective sees the human person as qualitatively different from other beings, with a transcendental dignity, intelligent and free and capable, therefore, of moral acts. AI systems are not free in the sense the human person is and, in this sense, its act cannot be judged according to the moral criteria that are applied to human acts.1 1 Statement of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences http://www.pas.va/content/accademia/en/events/2019/robotics/statementrobotics.html The White Paper on AI calls for a definition of AI with enough flexibility to accommodate technical progress while being precise enough to provide the necessary legal certainty. We support the approach that “data” and “algorithm” are the main elements of AI and that humans determine and program the goals which an AI system should attain.2 Ecosystem of excellence Excellence can only be established by developing skills and capacities of all stakeholders involved.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Skills Development
    Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on skills development Understanding the impact of artificial intelligence on skills development Understanding the impact of AI on skills development Published in 2021 by the This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) United Nations Educational, license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by- Scientific and Cultural Organization sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, 7, place de Fontenoy the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of 75352 Paris 07 SP the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://en.unesco. France org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). and UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training The designations employed and the presentation of UN Campus material throughout this publication do not imply the Platz der Vereinten Nationen 1 expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of 53113 Bonn UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, Germany territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © UNESCO 2021 The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication ISBN: 978-92-3-100446-9 are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. Written by Kelly Shiohira Design Christiane Marwecki Print Printed in Germany 2 Understanding the impact of AI on skills development SHORT SUMMARY Navigating the era of AI The era of artificial intelligence is young in years but advanced in impact. Intermediate skill jobs as we know them are fast disappearing as their tasks are systematically automated, and individuals are increasingly likely to encounter AI technology in their everyday lives.
    [Show full text]
  • The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: February 2018 Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation
    Future of University Centre for University of Center for a Electronic OpenAI Humanity of Oxford the Study of Cambridge New American Frontier Institute Existential Security Foundation Risk The Malicious Use February 2018 of Artificial Intelligence: Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation The Malicious Use of Artificial Intelligence: February 2018 Forecasting, Prevention, and Mitigation Miles Brundage Shahar Avin Jack Clark Helen Toner Peter Eckersley Ben Garfinkel Allan Dafoe Paul Scharre Thomas Zeitzoff Bobby Filar Hyrum Anderson Heather Roff Gregory C. Allen Jacob Steinhardt Carrick Flynn Seán Ó hÉigeartaigh Simon Beard Haydn Belfield Sebastian Farquhar Clare Lyle Rebecca Crootof Owain Evans Michael Page Joanna Bryson Roman Yampolskiy Dario Amodei 1 Corresponding author 9 American University 18 Centre for the Study of miles.brundage@philosophy. Existential Risk, University ox.ac.uk of Cambridge Future of Humanity Institute, 10 Endgame University of Oxford; Arizona State University 19 Future of Humanity 11 Endgame Institute, University of 2 Corresponding author, Oxford [email protected] University of Oxford/ Centre for the Study of 12 Arizona State University/New Existential Risk, University 20 Future of Humanity America Foundation of Cambridge Institute, University of Oxford 13 Center for a New American 3 OpenAI Security 21 Information Society Project, Yale University Open Philanthropy Project 4 14 Stanford University 22 Future of Humanity Electronic Frontier Institute, University of 5 Future of Humanity Foundation 15 Oxford Institute,
    [Show full text]
  • August 2015 Newsletter
    August 2015 Newsletter ------------------- Yesterday & Today Records PO Box 54 Miranda NSW 2228 Australia Phone: (02) 95311710 [email protected] www.yesterdayandtoday.com.au ----------------------------------------------- Postage It takes a lot to understand Australia Post. Essentially there are 2 main things. If an item is under 20mm thick it goes as a large letter at a much cheaper rate to something over 20mm thick which is then classified as a parcel. This applies to both Australian and overseas Australia 1 cd $2 2cds $3 3/4/5 cds $8. The latter is up to 500grams and then individual areas are charged separately. If not in NSW it is usually cheaper to send anything over 500 grams in a prepaid satchel. It is $14 for a 3 cds satchel and you can get around 25 cds in one. That is in cases. Without cases you can get maybe 60-70 in a 3kg satchel. Overseas 1 cd or 2 cds is going to be $8 (cheaper for N.Z) and that is with cases. BUT 6 or so can go for $8 if you send without cases. Maximum weight is 250grams. Over 250 grams or thicker than 20mm it goes as a parcel BUT the good thing is the weight is 500 grams maximum. Box sets will be too probably too heavy. ---------------------------------------------------------- Extras/ lucky dip How about 50 cds for $50. They will be sent without cases in a 3kg satchel $14 or if in Sydney postal region $10. Good titles all as new and no dud labels. Can also add cds in at $1 each to make up to post maximum weight.
    [Show full text]
  • Toward AI Security
    CENTER FOR LONG-TERM CYBERSECURITY CLTC WHITE PAPER SERIES Toward AI Security GLOBAL ASPIRATIONS FOR A MORE RESILIENT FUTURE JESSICA CUSSINS NEWMAN CLTC WHITE PAPER SERIES Toward AI Security GLOBAL ASPIRATIONS FOR A MORE RESILIENT FUTURE JESSICA CUSSINS NEWMAN FEBRUARY 2019 CENTER FOR LONG-TERM CYBERSECURITY TOWARD AI SECURITY iv TOWARD AI SECURITY TOWARD AI SECURITY Contents Acknowledgments 2 Abstract 3 Recommendations 4 Introduction 6 AI 101 8 The Transformative Nature of AI 11 AI Security 13 AI Security Map 13 1. Digital / Physical Domain 16 2. Political Domain 20 3. Economic Domain 25 4. Social Domain 29 Global AI Policy Responses 34 China 36 France 39 United Kingdom 45 United States 51 Canada 57 India 59 Japan 60 Singapore 62 South Korea 63 United Arab Emirates 65 Global AI Security Priorities 68 Working with the Private Sector 70 Conclusion 72 Appendix I: AI Policy Compendium 73 Appendix II: Overview Of AI Policy Interests From Ten Countries 76 Endnotes 78 1 TOWARD AI SECURITY Acknowledgments The Center for Long-Term Cybersecurity (CLTC) would like to thank the following individuals for their expertise, feedback, and contributions to this document: Anthony Aguirre, Seth Baum, Niel Bowerman, Jared Brown, Ryan Calo, Betsy Cooper, Elsa Kania, Jade Leung, Nicolas Miailhe, Deirdre Mulligan, Michael Page, Philip Reiner, Stuart Russell, and Helen Toner. Special thanks to Steven Weber, Ann Cleaveland, and Chuck Kapelke of CLTC for their support, feedback, and contributions to this report. CLTC would also like to thank the Hewlett Foundation for making this work possible. 2 TOWARD AI SECURITY TOWARD AI SECURITY Abstract This report uses the lens of global AI security to investigate the robustness and resiliency of AI systems, as well as the social, political, and economic systems with which AI interacts.
    [Show full text]