Evaluation of the Ovicidal Activity of Lufenuron and Spinosad on Fleas’ Eggs from Treated Dogs Michael W

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Evaluation of the Ovicidal Activity of Lufenuron and Spinosad on Fleas’ Eggs from Treated Dogs Michael W Evaluation of the Ovicidal Activity of Lufenuron and Spinosad on Fleas’ Eggs from Treated Dogs Michael W. Drydena Patricia A. Paynea Smith Vickia Ritchie L. Debraa Allen Lynnb aDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine /Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. 66503. bNovartis Animal Health US Inc., 3200 Northline Ave. Suite 300, Greensboro NC. 27408 Corresponding author: Michael W. Dryden phone: Department of Diagnostic Medicine /Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS. 66503. (785) 532-4613; FAX: (785) 532-4851; e-mail address: [email protected] KEY WORDS: Ctenocephalides felis, fleas, into rearing media to determine adult flea KS1, dog, flea egg, lufenuron, spinosad, emergence. The percent adult flea emer- milbemycin oxime gence from eggs collected from untreated ABSTRACT control dogs ranged from 19.3% to 69.4% throughout the study. Eggs collected from This study was conducted to compare the dogs treated with spinosad had percent adult production and viability of flea eggs on emergence of 49.2%, 20.3%, and 37.9% on dogs treated with either the combination of collection days 30, 60, and 90, respectively. milbemycin oxime-lufenuron or spinosad. Even though eggs were collected on days Fifteen dogs were randomly distributed into 51, 72, and 79, those eggs were not viable. three treatment groups and housed individu- No adult fleas developed from eggs collect- ally. Dogs in group 1 served as untreated ed from dogs treated with lufenuron-milbe- controls, dogs in group 2 were treated with mycin oxime over the entire 90-day study. milbemycin oxime-lufenuron, and dogs in group 3 were treated with spinosad. Prod- INTRODUCTION ucts were administered orally according to The elimination of fleas on dogs and cats label directions on days 0, 30, and 60. All and in the surrounding environment can be dogs were infested with 250 cat fleas,Cteno - achieved by killing adult fleas on the host cephalides felis, KS1 strain, on days 14, 28, and eliminating environmental life stages. 42, 49, 58, 70, 77, and 88. Forty-eight hours Several residual insecticides such as dinote- after each infestation, dogs were placed furan, fipronil, imidacloprid, selamectin, and into egg collection cages for 3 hours. Flea spinosad do an excellent job of killing exist- eggs were collected, counted, and placed ing adult fleas on the pet.1-8 However, after 198 Vol. 10, No. 3, 2012 • Intern J Appl Res Vet Med. treatment, the pet still lives in an infested conducted in Alabama, North Carolina, and home environment with flea eggs, larvae, Ireland, using dogs 14 to 16 weeks of age, pupae, and emerging fleas. These remain- was given.15 The combined efficacy of the ing life stages provide an ongoing source of three trials on day 29 was remarkably only adult fleas that will continually reinfest pets 2% .15 It is unknown if this poor residual treated only with adulticidal compounds.9 efficacy was due to variability in flea strain Historically, repeated application of insec- or the age of the dogs. ticides and insect growth regulators formu- Then, in 2011, two studies were pub- lated as environmental sprays were used in lished using the KS1 flea strain.7 This pub- an attempt to eliminate the premises flea lication detailed two studies where the ef- life stages.9,10 However, client compliance ficacy of spinosad against the KS1 flea strain with environmental treatment protocols was in dogs was 22.1% and 32.5%, respectively, disappointing and often resulted in recurrent on day 29 post-treatment.7 In each of the infestations and client dis-satisfaction.. above reported studies, adulticidal efficacy New insecticides and insect growth began to wane at approximately day 15 post- regulators in convenient dosage forms treatment. Additionally, in a 2011 study (spot-ons, tablets, oral suspensions, and conducted in France, the residual efficacy of injectables),applied directly to the pet, pro- spinosad and fipronil against fleas infest- vide prolonged residual activity and have ing dogs at 24 and 48 hours, the efficacy of dramatically improved pet owner compli- spinosad was 85.0% and 89.0%, respectively ance, helped to eliminate recurrent infesta- on day 28 post-infestation was evaluated.16 tions, and improved client satisfaction.11-12 Because the adulticidal efficacy of Although residual flea adulticides spinosad has been shown to wane in several such as dinotefuran, fipronil, imidacloprid, of the aforementioned studies, we conducted selamectin, and spinosad provide prolonged this study to determine if fleas survived long adulticidal activity, efficacy may decrease enough on spinosad-treated dogs to feed, throughout the month following administra- mate, and produce viable eggs. Therefore, tion. 2,7,13-17 As the residual efficacy decreas- this study was conducted to compare the es, adult female fleas may live longer than production and viability of flea eggs on dogs 24 hours and start producing eggs.13,14,16,18 treated with either the combination of milbe- The production of viable eggs may extend mycin oxime/lufenuron or spinosad and the infestation within the home. infested with the KS1 flea strain. We used Providing ovicidal (lufenuron, me- lufenuron as a positive reference control for thoprene, pyriproxyfen, or selamectin) egg viability. activity as part of a flea treatment protocol MATERIALS AND METHODS is extremely beneficial because any eggs Fleas produced by adults surviving adulticide treatment will be rendered nonviable. 6,13,19-21 The KS-1 strain of Ctenocephalides felis was used in the study. The KS1 cat flea An orally administered residual adul- strain of Ctenocephalides felis has been ticide flea product containing spinosad has maintained as a closed colony at Kansas been approved for use in the U.S. market. In State University since 1990. The colony 2010 and 2011, studies indicated that under was originally established by removing certain conditions or with some flea strains, fleas from dogs and cats at a local animal the residual efficacy of spinosad decreases shelter in Riley county Kansas. In-vitro and markedly towards the end of the month.7,15 in-vivo evaluations have indicated that the In a presentation on spinosad residual ef- KS1 strain has some level of resistance or ficacy given at the 55th Annual Meeting reduced susceptibility to carbaryl, chlorpy- of the American Association of Veterinary riphos, fenthion, fipronil, imidacloprid, per- Parasitologists, results from three studies methrin, pyrethrins, and spinosad. 2,7,13,18, 22-26 Intern J Appl Res Vet Med • Vol. 10, No. 3, 2012. 199 Due to the hardiness of this flea strain, it has 14, 28, 42, 49, 58, 70, 77, and 88. This cor- been used extensively as an indicator of flea responds to 14 and 28 days following the product performance. In fact, almost every first treatment; 12, 19, and 28 days follow- major flea product has been tested against ing the second treatment; and 10, 17 and 28, this flea strain either before or shortly after days following the third dosing. introduction to the US market. Forty-eight hours after each flea infes- Animals and Housing tation, the dogs were removed from their This study used 15 purpose bred mongrel individual kennels and placed into stainless dogs between 6 and 12 months of age steel metabolic cages with expanded metal housed in individual kennels. The line of floors over stainless steel solid surface col- dogs is one approved by the FDA for pivotal lection pans for flea egg collections. Dogs studies; the age range is standard and usual were housed in the metabolic cages for 3 for conducting investigations. Dogs must be hours. After 3 hours, the dogs were brushed housed in individual kennels for individual to dislodge any remaining eggs. The dogs observation and to obtain accurate data. were then removed from the metabolic During the 14-day preconditioning phase, no cages, given one dose of Capstar® (niten- medications or pesticides were administered pyram) (minimum dose 1.0 mg/kg) orally, or used, and none of the dogs were bathed or and returned to their original kennels. shampooed. All animal care and procedures All flea eggs collected in the stainless conformed to the established guidelines of steel pans were counted. Up to 100 eggs the Kansas State University Institutional from each dog were placed in glass Petri Animal Care and Use Committee and those dishes containing growth media (sand, of Novartis Animal Health. ground dog chow, brewer’s yeast, and Animal Selection and Randomization dried blood), and held in a growth rearing On day 1, the dogs were weighed and chamber (I-30B, Percival Manufacturing randomly distributed into three groups, five Co, Boone, IA; 27-28° C, 70-80% relative dogs in each group. humidity, 24 hours dark). At 10 – 12 days after egg collection, pupae (and any larvae Treatments and Infestation that had not completed cocoon formation) Dogs allocated to group1 served as untreated were sifted from the media and placed into controls. Dogs in group 2 were treated with plastic vials with lids. Adult emergence was ® ® Sentinel Flavor Tabs (Novartis Animal determined by counting emerged adult fleas Health) milbemycin oxime - lufenuron at about 28 days after egg collection. Per- (minimum dosage 0.5mg/kg milbemycin ox- sonnel conducting egg counts, egg collec- ime, 10mg/kg lufenuron) per label directions tions, and viability assessments were blinded immediately after a meal. Dogs in group 3 to treatment group allocation. were treated with the appropriate size Com- Statistics fortis® (Elanco) spinosad tablet (minimum dosage 30 mg/kg) per label directions, with An analysis of variance (ANOVA, SAS a meal. PROC MIXED) was used to compare the percent of adult fleas that developed Dogs were observed to ensure they had from eggs recovered from each dog in the consumed a meal before treatment and ob- milbemycin oxime - lufenuron and spinosad served for 1 hour after tablet administration treatment groups.
Recommended publications
  • Neuroactive Insecticides: Targets, Selectivity, Resistance, and Secondary Effects
    EN58CH06-Casida ARI 5 December 2012 8:11 Neuroactive Insecticides: Targets, Selectivity, Resistance, and Secondary Effects John E. Casida1,∗ and Kathleen A. Durkin2 1Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology Laboratory, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, 2Molecular Graphics and Computational Facility, College of Chemistry, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720; email: [email protected], [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013. 58:99–117 Keywords The Annual Review of Entomology is online at acetylcholinesterase, calcium channels, GABAA receptor, nicotinic ento.annualreviews.org receptor, secondary targets, sodium channel This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153645 Abstract Copyright c 2013 by Annual Reviews. Neuroactive insecticides are the principal means of protecting crops, people, All rights reserved livestock, and pets from pest insect attack and disease transmission. Cur- ∗ Corresponding author rently, the four major nerve targets are acetylcholinesterase for organophos- phates and methylcarbamates, the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor for neonicotinoids, the γ-aminobutyric acid receptor/chloride channel for by Public Health Information Access Project on 04/29/14. For personal use only. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2013.58:99-117. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org polychlorocyclohexanes and fiproles, and the voltage-gated sodium channel for pyrethroids and dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane. Species selectivity and acquired resistance are attributable in part to structural differences in binding subsites, receptor subunit interfaces, or transmembrane regions. Additional targets are sites in the sodium channel (indoxacarb and metaflumizone), the glutamate-gated chloride channel (avermectins), the octopamine receptor (amitraz metabolite), and the calcium-activated calcium channel (diamides). Secondary toxic effects in mammals from off-target serine hydrolase inhibi- tion include organophosphate-induced delayed neuropathy and disruption of the cannabinoid system.
    [Show full text]
  • BOARD of PESTICIDES CONTROL January 15, 2020 Augusta Civic Center, 76 Community Drive, Kennebec/Penobscot Room, Augusta, Maine
    STATE OF MAINE DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, CONSERVATION AND FORESTRY BOARD OF PESTICIDES CONTROL 28 STATE HOUSE STATION UGUSTA AINE JANET T. MILLS A , M 04333 AMANDA E. BEAL GOVERNOR COMMISSIONER BOARD OF PESTICIDES CONTROL January 15, 2020 Augusta Civic Center, 76 Community Drive, Kennebec/Penobscot Room, Augusta, Maine 1:00 - 1:30 PM Board Meeting 1:30 - 2:30 PM Public Forum On Notification 2:30 – 4:00 PM Board Meeting Continued AGENDA 1. Introductions of Board and Staff 2. Minutes of the November 8, 2019 Board Meeting Presentation By: Megan Patterson, Director Action Needed: Amend and/or Approve 3. Request for Financial Support from the Maine Mobile Health Program and the Eastern Maine Development Corporation Since 1995 the Board has supported a Migrant and Seasonal Farmworker Safety Education program. The Maine Mobile Health Program (MMHP) and Eastern Maine Development Corporation (EMDC provided training to 315 migrant agricultural workers during the 2019 season). Funding to support this effort in 2020 is being requested in the amount of $5,360, which is the same amount the Board provided in 2019. The funding has been accounted for in the Board’s FY20 budget. Presentation By: Chris Huh, Program Manager, Farmworkers Jobs Program, Eastern Maine Development Corporation Elizabeth Charles McGough, Director of Outreach, Maine Mobile Health Program MEGAN PATTERSON, DIRECTOR PHONE: (207) 287-2731 90 BLOSSOM LANE, DEERING BUILDING WWW.THINKFIRSTSPRAYLAST.ORG Action Needed: Discussion and Determination if the Board Wishes to Fund this Request 4. Request for Financial Support from the Maine State Apiarist for CLEAR Training Maine State Apiarist, Jennifer Lund, has requested funding to attend the National Certified Investigator & Inspector Basic Training held in Raleigh, North Carolina in March 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetically Modified Baculoviruses for Pest
    INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS This page intentionally left blank INSECT CONTROL BIOLOGICAL AND SYNTHETIC AGENTS EDITED BY LAWRENCE I. GILBERT SARJEET S. GILL Amsterdam • Boston • Heidelberg • London • New York • Oxford Paris • San Diego • San Francisco • Singapore • Sydney • Tokyo Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier Academic Press, 32 Jamestown Road, London, NW1 7BU, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA 525 B Street, Suite 1800, San Diego, CA 92101-4495, USA ª 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved The chapters first appeared in Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science, edited by Lawrence I. Gilbert, Kostas Iatrou, and Sarjeet S. Gill (Elsevier, B.V. 2005). All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (þ44) 1865 843830, fax (þ44) 1865 853333, e-mail [email protected]. Requests may also be completed on-line via the homepage (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/permissions). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Insect control : biological and synthetic agents / editors-in-chief: Lawrence I. Gilbert, Sarjeet S. Gill. – 1st ed. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests–Control. 2. Insecticides. I. Gilbert, Lawrence I. (Lawrence Irwin), 1929- II. Gill, Sarjeet S. SB931.I42 2010 632’.7–dc22 2010010547 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN 978-0-12-381449-4 Cover Images: (Top Left) Important pest insect targeted by neonicotinoid insecticides: Sweet-potato whitefly, Bemisia tabaci; (Top Right) Control (bottom) and tebufenozide intoxicated by ingestion (top) larvae of the white tussock moth, from Chapter 4; (Bottom) Mode of action of Cry1A toxins, from Addendum A7.
    [Show full text]
  • Medication List
    Medication List Walgreens Plus™ members receive discounts on thousands of generic and brand-name medications included on this Medication List, which is divided into two sections, “Value Priced” Medications and “Discounted” Medications*. The price for a medication identified as “Value-Priced” is listed below: Get savings up to 85% off Cash Prices • 30-day-supply drugs cost $5 (tier 1), $10 (tier 2) or $15 (tier 3) on Atorvastatin (generic Lipitor) and • 90-day-supply drugs cost $10 (tier 1), $20 (tier 2) or $30 (tier 3) Rosuvastatin (generic Crestor) †† The Discounted Medications section lists the discounts offered to Walgreens Plus members on other generic and brand-name medications not included in the Value-Priced Medication section. The price for a medication is based on its tier and whether it is a 30-day or 90-day supply†. There may be an additional cost for quanities greater than those listed. This discount prescription pricing applies only to Walgreen Plus members on prescriptions purchased in select Walgreens stores that are not billed to insurance and/or used in combination with other health or pharmacy benefit programs. For further details, see your pharmacist or Walgreens.com/Plus. VALUE GENERICS NAPROXEN 250MG TAB 2 60 180 Antifungal NAPROXEN 500MG TAB 2 60 180 Quantity NAPROXEN 375MG TAB 2 60 180 Drug Name Tier 30 90 NAPROXEN DR 500MG TAB 3 60 180 FLUCONAZOLE 150MG TAB 2 1 3 TERBINAFINE 250MG TAB 2 30 90 Asthma Quantity Antiviral Drug Name Tier 30 90 Quantity ALBUTEROL 0.083% INH SOLN 25X3ML 2 75 225 Drug Name Tier 30 90 AMINOPHYLLINE
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,852,618 B2 Clough (45) Date of Patent: Oct
    USOO8852618B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,852,618 B2 Clough (45) Date of Patent: Oct. 7, 2014 (54) INSECTICIDAL MIXTURE CONTAINING CA 2429218 A1 6, 2002 GAMMA-CYHALOTHRN CH 689326 A5 4f1995 EP O237227 A1 9, 1987 EP 0771526 A2 5, 1997 (75) Inventor: Martin Stephen Clough, Bracknell EP O988788 A1 3f2000 (GB) FR 272O230 A1 12/1995 JP 63. 126805 A2 5, 1988 (73) Assignee: Syngenta Limited, Guildford (GB) JP 63126805 A2 5, 1988 JP 63126805 5, 1998 c - r WO WO 86 O7525 A1 12, 1986 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO 93 03618 A2 3, 1993 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95 229O2 A1 8/1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 824 days. WO WO9533380 A1 12, 1995 WO WO 96 16543 A2 6, 1996 (21) Appl. No.: 12/633,063 WO WO97 06687 A1 2/1997 WO WO974O692 A1 11, 1997 (22) Filed: Dec.a V88, 2009 WO WOOOO2453 A1 1, 2000 OTHER PUBLICATIONS (65) Prior Publication Data US 201O/OO81714 A1 Apr. 1, 2010 Canadian Office Action (Applin. No. 2,452,515 filed: Jul. 10, 2002) mailing date Oct. 1, 2010 (pp. 1-2). Related U.S. Application Data Allen et al. Transgenic & Conventional Insect & Weed Control Sys tems; Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conference, vol. 2, 1065 (62) Division of application No. 10/484.745, filed as 1068 (1999), USA. application No. PCT/GB02/03181 on Jul. 10, 2002, Anonymous; Pesticide Mixtures for Control of Insect and Acarid now Pat. No.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Insecticides Used to Control Spodoptera Frugiperda (J.E
    RESEARCH Impact of insecticides used to control Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) in corn on survival, sex ratio, and reproduction of Trichogramma pretiosum Riley offspring Jander R. Souza1, Geraldo A. Carvalho1, Alexandre P. Moura2*, Marcelo H.G. Couto1, and Jader B. Maia1 Corn (Zea mays L.) is cultivated in large areas and considered one of the world’s major cereal crops. There are several arthropod pests that can reduce its production such as the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) (Lep.: Noctuidae), which is considered to be the main pest for corn. Fall armyworm is primarily controlled by insecticides. The use of biological control agents to manage this pest is growing with an emphasis on the egg parasitoid Trichogramma pretiosum Riley (Hym.: Trichogrammatidae). Thus, the aim of this research was to evaluate the impact of the following insecticides (g ai L-1) beta-cypermethrin (0.03), chlorfenapyr (0.60), chlorpyrifos (0.96), spinosad (0.16), etofenprox (0.10), triflumuron (0.08), alfa-cypermethrin/teflubenzuron (0.0425/0.0425), and lambda-cyhalothrin/thiamethoxam (0.11/0.083) on survival, sex ratio, reproduction, and T. pretiosum offspring. Distilled water was used as a control. Commercial insecticide formulations were diluted in distilled water. Bioassays used Anagasta kuehniella eggs treated with insecticides which were afterwards exposed to parasitism. Bioassays were conducted under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2 ºC, 70 ± 10% RH, and 12:12 h photoperiod. Alfa-cypermethrin/teflubenzuron, beta-cypermethrin, chlorpyrifos, chlorfenapyr, spinosad, etofenprox, and lambda-cyhalothrin/thiamethoxam reduced parasitism capacity of maternal generation females as well as the percentage of insect emergence from the F1 generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Reduced Risk Pesticides for Control of Onion Thrips on Onions
    Evaluation of Reduced Risk Pesticides for Control of Onion Thrips on Onions Jennifer Allen1,3, Jeff Tolman2 and Cynthia Scott-Dupree3 1 – Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Guelph ON N1G 4Y2, E-mail: [email protected] 2 – Southern Crop Protection and Food Research Centre – AAFC, London ON N5V 4T3 3 – Dept. Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph ON N1G 2W1 INTRODUCTION RESULTS Onion thrips (OT) are a cosmopolitan species that are found in onion growing 2001 – Foliar Treatments 140 120 regions around the world. They have been recorded as economic pests on onion, 120 100 100 garlic, leeks, tomatoes, cucumbers and beans. 80 80 * 60 60 * Adults and nymphs feed by piercing and sucking leaf tissues, removing cell Mean # OT/Plant 40 40 * 20 OT/Plant # Mean 20 contents (Fig. 1). Light feeding results in silvery streaks while heavy feeding may 0 55 0 Days After Treatment 23 result in plant die-back. Research has shown that onion losses can exceed 40% Days After Treatment Novaluron Spinosad (L) + B. bassiani Spinosad (H)+ B. bassiani B. bassiani Novaluron Spinosad (L) Spinosad (H) when high OT populations cannot be controlled. Spinosad (H) Lambda-cyhalothrin Control Lambda-cyhalothrin Kaolin Clay Control 2002 – Foliar Treatments 25 100 20 80 15 60 40 10 * * * * Mean # OT/Plant * * 20 Mean # OT/Plant * 5 * * * 0 * 0 275 28 Days After Treatment Days After Treatment Kaolin Lambda-cyhalothrin Novaluron (L) Lambda-cyhalothrin Spinosad (L) Spinosad (H) Control Novaluron (H) Pyriproxifen Pymetrozine Control a) b) NYSAES PHOTO c) 2003 – Foliar Treatments Fig.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Spinosad, Spinosad Bait, and Chloronicotinyl Insecticides on Mortality and Control of Adult and Larval Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae)
    HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Effects of Spinosad, Spinosad Bait, and Chloronicotinyl Insecticides on Mortality and Control of Adult and Larval Western Cherry Fruit Fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) 1 2 WEE L. YEE AND DIANE G. ALSTON J. Econ. Entomol. 99(5): 1722Ð1732 (2006) ABSTRACT Effects of spinosad, spinosad bait, and the chloronicotinyl insecticides imidacloprid and thiacloprid on mortality of the adults and larvae of western cherry fruit ßy, Rhagoletis indifferens Curran (Diptera: Tephritidae), were determined in the laboratory and the Þeld. Spinosad and spinosad bait caused higher adult mortality than imidacloprid, which caused higher mortality than thiacloprid. Only spinosad bait prevented oviposition. All materials were more toxic to adults when ingested than when topically applied. Spinosad bait had the greatest residual toxicity on leaves, killing 100% of adults when aged for 14 d in the Þeld. When materials were sprayed on infested cherries, numbers of live larvae in fruit after 8 d were lower in imidacloprid and thiacloprid than in spinosad and spinosad bait treatments, which did not differ from the control, but all materials reduced larval emergence over 30 d. In the Þeld, spinosad and spinosad bait were as effective in suppressing larval infestations as azinphos- methyl and carbaryl, whereas imidacloprid was effective in most cases and thiacloprid was generally less effective than azinphos-methyl and carbaryl. Overall, results in the laboratory and Þeld show that spinosad and chloronicotinyl insecticides differed signiÞcantly in their effectiveness against adults and larvae of R. indifferens but that spinosad, spinosad bait, and imidacloprid seem to be acceptable substitutes for organophosphate and carbamate insecticides for controlling this fruit ßy.
    [Show full text]
  • Spinosad (Natroba) for Head Lice MARGARET Y
    STEPS New Drug Reviews Spinosad (Natroba) for Head Lice MARGARET Y. PIO, PharmD, BCPS, CDE, Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, Texas AMIMI OSAYANDE, MD, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas STEPS new drug reviews Spinosad (Natroba) is a prescription topical pediculicide labeled for the treatment of head cover Safety, Tolerability, lice in patients four years and older.1 In addition to its pediculicidal activity, spinosad has also Effectiveness, Price, and 2 Simplicity. Each indepen- been shown to have ovicidal activity. Unrelated to other insecticides, spinosad is produced by dent review is provided a bacterium, Saccharopolyspora spinosa.1,2 Although it is neurotoxic to lice, it does not seem to by authors who have no have a similar effect on humans or animals. financial association with the drug manufacturer. The series coordinator for Cost of full AFP is Allen F. Shaugh- Drug Dosage Dose form course* nessy, PharmD, Tufts University Family Medicine Spinosad One treatment (if warranted, a Topical suspension (0.9% strength, $147 Residency Program at (Natroba) second treatment may be used 120 mL per bottle) Cambridge Health Alli- seven days later) ance, Malden, Mass. A collection of STEPS pub- *—Estimated retail price of one treatment based on information obtained at http://www.lowestmed.com (accessed lished in AFP is available May 2, 2013). at http://www.aafp.org/ afp/steps. SAFETY TOLERABILITY Spinosad does not have any major adverse Spinosad is generally well tolerated. The effects because topical application does not most common adverse effects are erythema result in systemic exposure.1 Unlike lindane, at the site of application (3.1%), ocular spinosad has not been shown to cause neu- hyperemia (2.2%), and irritation at the site rologic toxicities, such as seizures and death.
    [Show full text]
  • Managing Diseases and Insects in Home Orchards J
    Managing diseases and insects in home orchards J. W. Pscheidt, H. Stoven, A. Thompson, B. Edmunds, N. Wiman, and R. Hilton In this guide, you can learn best pest management practices for your home Contents orchards. Suggested materials and times of application should have activity Table 1. Home garden/small orchard on the indicated pest. There are many fungicides and insecticides that are products ........................ 2 Importance of controlling diseases effective for managing the diseases and insects listed on the label when used and insects in commercial fruit according to the label directions. For more information, see the PNW Pest districts ......................... 3 Management Handbooks, at https://pnwhandbooks.org. Applying pesticides safely ......... 3 The best way to manage diseases and insects in your orchard is to combine Managing diseases and insects methods. Along with using pesticides, there are cultural and biological without using pesticides .......... 4 Apples .......................... 5 practices also that can help prevent or manage diseases and insects (see Pears ........................... 7 page 4). Pesticide timing and thorough spray coverage are the keys to good Peaches and Nectarines .......... 9 pest management. For good coverage, wet the leaves, twigs, and branches Apricots ........................10 thoroughly. (Note: This can be difficult with hand sprayers.) When you Cherries ........................11 use wettable powders, be sure to shake or stir the spray mix often during Prunes and Plums ...............13 application because the powders tend to settle at the bottom of the spray Walnuts ........................14 container after mixing. Hazelnuts (Filberts) .............14 To avoid excess chemical residues, be sure to use the correct rate and Moss and lichen .................15 proper interval between the last spray and harvest, as shown on the label.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenothrin Interim Registration Review Decision and EPA Regulations at 40 CFR Section 152.44, and No Other Changes Have Been Made to the Labeling of This Product
    Docket Number EPA-HQ-OPP-2011-0539 www.regulations.gov Phenothrin Interim Registration Review Decision Case Number 0426 September 2020 Approved by: __ __ Elissa Reaves, Ph.D. Acting Director Pesticide Re-evaluation Division Date: _____9/30/20__________________ ___________________________ Anita Pease Director Antimicrobials Division Date: _______09/30/2020______________ Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 4 A. Updates since the Proposed Interim Decision was issued ................................................ 6 B. Summary of Phenothrin Registration Review .................................................................. 7 C. Summary of Public Comments on the Proposed Interim Decision and Agency Responses .................................................................................................................................... 9 II. USE AND USAGE ............................................................................................................... 13 III. SCIENTIFIC ASSESSMENTS ............................................................................................ 14 A. Human Health Risks ....................................................................................................... 14 1. Pyrethroid FQPA Safety Factor Determination.......................................................... 15 2. Risk Summary and Characterization .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List Fair Trade USA® Agricultural Production Standard Version 1.1.0
    Version 1.1.0 Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List Fair Trade USA® Agricultural Production Standard Version 1.1.0 Introduction Through the implementation of our standards, Fair Trade USA aims to promote sustainable livelihoods and safe working conditions, protection of the environment, and strong, transparent supply chains.. Our standards work to limit negative impacts on communities and the environment. All pesticides can be potentially hazardous to human health and the environment, both on the farm and in the community. They can negatively affect the long-term sustainability of agricultural livelihoods. The Fair Trade USA Agricultural Production Standard (APS) seeks to minimize these risks from pesticides by restricting the use of highly hazardous pesticides and enhancing the implementation of risk mitigation practices for lower risk pesticides. This approach allows greater flexibility for producers, while balancing controls on impacts to human and environmental health. This document lists the pesticides that are prohibited or restricted in the production of Fair Trade CertifiedTM products, as required in Objective 4.4.2 of the APS. It also includes additional rules for the use of restricted pesticides. Purpose The purpose of this document is to outline the rules which prohibit or restrict the use of hazardous pesticides in the production of Fair Trade Certified agricultural products. Scope • The Prohibited and Restricted Pesticides List (PRPL) applies to all crops certified against the Fair Trade USA Agricultural Production Standard (APS). • Restrictions outlined in this list apply to active ingredients in any pesticide used by parties included in the scope of the Certificate while handling Fair Trade Certified products.
    [Show full text]