DOCSLIB.ORG

Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the European Union

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the European Union U.S. and EU Business Confidential Information (BCI) and Highly Sensitive Business Information (HSBI) Redacted European Communities and Certain Member States – Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the European Union (DS316) RESPONSES OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE THIRD SET OF QUESTIONS FROM THE ARBITRATOR AND RESPONSES OF THE UNITED STATES TO THE QUESTIONS BY THE EUROPEAN UNION March 15, 2019 U.S. and EU Business Confidential Information (BCI) and Highly Sensitive Business Information (HSBI) Redacted TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 QUESTIONS SENT TO PARTIES ON 7 FEBRUARY 2019 ............................................. 1 1.1 For the United States ........................................................................................................... 1 Question 93 (US) ................................................................................................................ 1 Question 94 (US) ................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 For the European Union ...................................................................................................... 2 Question 95 (EU) ................................................................................................................ 2 Question 96 (EU) ................................................................................................................ 3 Question 97 (EU) ................................................................................................................ 3 Question 98 (EU) ................................................................................................................ 3 1.3 For both parties ................................................................................................................... 3 Question 99 (both parties) ................................................................................................... 3 Question 100 (both parties) ................................................................................................. 4 Question 101 (both parties) ................................................................................................. 5 2 QUESTIONS SENT TO PARTIES ON 11 FEBRUARY 2019 ................................................. 8 2.1 For the United States ................................................................................................................ 8 Question 102 (US) .............................................................................................................. 8 Question 103 (US) .............................................................................................................. 9 2.2 For the European Union ......................................................................................................... 10 Question 104 (EU) ............................................................................................................ 10 Question 105 (EU) ............................................................................................................ 10 Question 106 (EU) ............................................................................................................ 10 2.3 For both parties ...................................................................................................................... 11 Question 107 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 11 Question 108 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 11 Question 109 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 11 Question 110 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 12 U.S. and EU Business Confidential Information (BCI) and Highly Sensitive Business Information (HSBI) Redacted European Communities and Certain Member States – U.S. Responses to the Third Set of Questions Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: from the Arbitrator Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the European Union (DS316) March 15, 2019 – Page ii Question 111 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 12 Question 112 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 13 Question 113 (both parties) ............................................................................................... 15 3 ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS FOR THE PARTIES ................................................................ 16 3.1 For the United States .............................................................................................................. 16 Question 114 (US) ............................................................................................................ 16 Question 115 (US) ............................................................................................................ 17 Question 116 (US) ............................................................................................................ 20 Question 117 (US) ............................................................................................................ 23 Question 118 (US) ............................................................................................................ 24 Question 119 (US) ............................................................................................................ 25 Question 120 (US) ............................................................................................................ 25 Question 121 (US) ............................................................................................................ 29 Question 122 (US) ............................................................................................................ 30 Question 123 (US) ............................................................................................................ 32 Question 124 (US) ............................................................................................................ 32 Question 125 (US) ............................................................................................................ 34 Question 126 (US) ............................................................................................................ 35 Question 127 (US) ............................................................................................................ 35 Question 128 (US) ............................................................................................................ 38 Question 129 (US) ............................................................................................................ 38 Question 130 (US) ............................................................................................................ 39 Question 131 (US) ............................................................................................................ 39 Question 132 (US) ............................................................................................................ 40 Question 133 (US) ............................................................................................................ 41 Question 134 (US) ............................................................................................................ 43 Question 135 (US) ............................................................................................................ 44 Question 136 (US) ............................................................................................................ 63 Question 137 (US) ............................................................................................................ 66 U.S. and EU Business Confidential Information (BCI) and Highly Sensitive Business Information (HSBI) Redacted European Communities and Certain Member States – U.S. Responses to the Third Set of Questions Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft: from the Arbitrator Recourse to Article 22.6 of the DSU by the European Union (DS316) March 15, 2019 – Page iii Question 138 (US) ............................................................................................................ 66 Question 139 (US) ............................................................................................................ 66 Question 140 (US) ............................................................................................................ 70 Question 141 (US) ............................................................................................................ 71 Question 142 (US) ............................................................................................................ 72 Question 143 (US) ............................................................................................................ 72 Question 144 (US) ............................................................................................................ 73 Question 145 (US) ............................................................................................................ 73 3.2 For the European Union ......................................................................................................... 74 Question 146
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Aerospace Engine Data
    AEROSPACE ENGINE DATA Data for some concrete aerospace engines and their craft ................................................................................. 1 Data on rocket-engine types and comparison with large turbofans ................................................................... 1 Data on some large airliner engines ................................................................................................................... 2 Data on other aircraft engines and manufacturers .......................................................................................... 3 In this Appendix common to Aircraft propulsion and Space propulsion, data for thrust, weight, and specific fuel consumption, are presented for some different types of engines (Table 1), with some values of specific impulse and exit speed (Table 2), a plot of Mach number and specific impulse characteristic of different engine types (Fig. 1), and detailed characteristics of some modern turbofan engines, used in large airplanes (Table 3). DATA FOR SOME CONCRETE AEROSPACE ENGINES AND THEIR CRAFT Table 1. Thrust to weight ratio (F/W), for engines and their crafts, at take-off*, specific fuel consumption (TSFC), and initial and final mass of craft (intermediate values appear in [kN] when forces, and in tonnes [t] when masses). Engine Engine TSFC Whole craft Whole craft Whole craft mass, type thrust/weight (g/s)/kN type thrust/weight mini/mfin Trent 900 350/63=5.5 15.5 A380 4×350/5600=0.25 560/330=1.8 cruise 90/63=1.4 cruise 4×90/5000=0.1 CFM56-5A 110/23=4.8 16
    [Show full text]
  • Transatlantic Airline Fuel Efficiency Ranking, 2017
    WHITE PAPER SEPTEMBER 2018 TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 Brandon Graver, Ph.D., and Daniel Rutherford, Ph.D. www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Tim Johnson, Andrew Murphy, Anastasia Kharina, and Amy Smorodin for their review and support. We also acknowledge Airline Data Inc. for providing processed BTS data, and FlightGlobal for Ascend Fleet data. International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2018 International Council on Clean Transportation TRANSATLANTIC AIRLINE FUEL EFFICIENCY RANKING, 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ iii 1. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................... 2 2. METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Airline selection .................................................................................................................................3 2.2 Fuel burn modeling..........................................................................................................................5 2.3 Fuel efficiency calculation ............................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Q1 2020 First Results and Main Airlines Fleets
    OUR WEBSITE 1 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Q1 2020 first results and main airlines fleets In this quarterly publication (next in October) you will find facts and figures about the civil aviation industry, based on data extracted from our air transport databases. This quarter you will find : • Main airlines Q1 2020 traffic results with 2019/20 comparison • Main airlines current fleets (in April 2020) with planned orders and options • Top 15 airports by passenger traffic, aircrafts movements and cargo for Q1 2020 • Airliners Q1 2020 orders and deliveries with 2019/20 evolution We wish you a pleasant reading ! Every question or suggestion concerning this publication or the databases is welcome at : [email protected] If you have missed the last report please click on the following link : Main airports traffic 2019 Summary 1 - Main Airlines’ traffic Q1 2020 2 - Main Airlines current and planned fleets (April 2020) by region AFRICA & ASIA MIDDLE EAST NORTH EUROPE AMERICA LATIN AMERICA OCEANIA & CARIBBEAN 3 - Main Airport’s traffic Q1 2020 - Top 15 4 - Airliners Orders and Deliveries Q1 2020 5 - Our Databases and Services This Data is taken from our Air Transport Databases (ATD) Back to summary For more information please contact us at : [email protected] OUR WEBSITE 2 / 1716 07 / 07 2020 / AIR TRANSPORT TREND BULLETIN Main Airlines’ traffic Q1 2020 Q1 results show the first impacts of Covid-19 on air traffic, as most countries started travel restrictions and lockdown in March. The worst numbers were for the carriers based in China, which were grounded in Fe- bruary.
    [Show full text]
  • HPC Sept 02 Airbus A380
    Commercial Aircraft Extra large by any measure Advanced composites play a big role in the success of the world’s largest commercial aircraft. t 555 passengers and a maximum take-off According to Airbus’ current plans, the A380 weight of 1,235,000 lb (560 metric tons), will carry 30 metric tons/66,000 lb of structural A“huge” is the most appropriate word to composites, primarily of carbon-fiber/epoxy, or 16 describe the Airbus A380-800, the world’s largest percent of its airframe weight (approx. 170 metric jet airliner, set to begin regular service in 2006. tons), making it the most composite-intensive The plane itself is an enormous achievement, but commercial aircraft to date. Due to the higher so is its impact on the worlds of commercial avia- stiffness-to-weight performance of carbon fiber tion, advanced materials and composite manufac- composites, this is equivalent to the replacement turing technologies. Over a decade in the planning of 20 percent of conventional aluminum struc- and design phase, the first flying aircraft is cur- ture. This figure could rise to 35 metric tons (77,000 lb) as the final component designs near completion. Wing leading edges will take advan- tage of economies realized in the use of glass-rein- forced thermoplastics. And 4 percent of the air- Source: Airbus Industrie frame will be GLARE (GLAss fiber-REinforced aluminum), a multi-layer laminate of fiberglass/epoxy and aluminum to be used in the upper fuselage panels (discussed below and in HPC May/June 1996, p. 28). Beyond the structural composites under discussion here, as many as 30 metric tons of composites, mainly fiberglass/phe- nolic, may be used in each plane’s interior.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Flight Uncontained Engine Failure Airbus A380-842, VH-OQA
    In-flight uncontained engine failure Airbus A380-842, VH-OQA overhead Batam Island, Indonesia on 4 November 2010 What happened and why Shortly after taking off from Changi Airport, Singapore, the No. 2 engine on a Qantas Airbus A380 failed about 7,000 ft above Batam Island, Indonesia. The failure sent engine fragments through the left wing and damaged some of the aircraft’s systems. The engine failure was a result of an oil feed stub pipe that was incorrectly manufactured with a thin wall that resulted in fatigue cracking of the pipe. This crack released oil into the engine during the flight, which caused an internal fire. That fire led to one of the engine’s turbine discs fracturing and then rapidly over speeding before it burst, broke free of the engine casing, and impacted the A380’s airframe. What happened to the aircraft? The damage to the aircraft from the disc fragments resulted in the aircraft’s hydraulic, electrical and other systems being degraded. Despite the damage, the flight crew managed the multitude of system failures before safely returning the aircraft and landing at Changi Airport without any injuries to the crew and passengers. What’s been done to prevent this from happening again? The ATSB, Rolls-Royce, aviation regulators, and operators of Trent 900-powered A380s took a range of steps to ensure that engines with incorrectly manufactured oil feed stub pipes were removed from service or managed to enable the aircraft to continue to operate safely. Rolls-Royce also introduced software that would automatically shut down a Trent 900 engine before its turbine disc over speeds, in the unlikely event of a similar occurrence.
    [Show full text]
  • WORLD AIRLINER DIRECTORY Mainliners All Maxed Out?
    WORLD AIRLINER DIRECTORY Mainliners All Maxed out? Flight International’s annual review of global commercial airliner programmes begins with a look at mainline aircraft – and inevitably focuses on Boeing’s troubled narrowbody type BERNIE BALDWIN LONDON trusting that all the necessary work was move to cull 39 of the type from its orderbook carried out properly. It will be interesting to led the airframer to admit that the consequence here can only be one starting point in see the approach taken on aircraft such as the – given the lack of orders from other airlines – reviewing the aircraft covered by this in-development 777X family. was to announce the end of A380 deliveries in T part of the 2019 World Airliner Di- Whether the Max (below in flight, 2021. Although the Boeing 747-8 is still coming rectory – and that is the ongoing trib- production and during grounding) does or off the line, only freighter versions are left in the ulations of the Boeing 737 Max family. With does not fly this year, the length of the ground- backlog. Barring a very unlikely turnaround, the the whole fleet of the type grounded since 13 ing and the visibility it has had with the travel- era of jumbo and superjumbo jet production is March, the prospects for the Max are current- ling public could well affect how customers now coming to a close. ly a complete unknown. select their flights. Seasoned travellers know While the flagship at the top of the fleet Boeing is sticking to its statement that it which aircraft they like and even the seats they awaits its final bow, Airbus’s acquisition of expects to achieve clearance from the US prefer to occupy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Boeing 787 Case
    Managing New Product Development and Supply Chain Risks: The Boeing 787 Case Christopher S. Tang and Joshua D. Zimmerman1 To stimulate revenue growth and market response, Boeing decided to develop the UCLA Anderson School 787 Dreamliner. The 787 Dreamliner is not only a revolutionary aircraft, but it also [email protected] utilizes an unconventional supply chain intended to drastically reduce development [email protected] cost and time. However, despite significant management efforts and capital Commented by investment, Boeing is currently facing a series of delays in its schedule for the maiden James I. Nelson M.S. flight and plane delivery to customers. This paper analyzes Boeing's rationale for the MBCP, CORP 787's unconventional supply chain, describes Boeing's challenges for managing this Business Continuity Services supply chain, and highlights some key lessons for other manufacturers to consider when designing their supply chains for new product development. Acknowledgments: We would like to thank William Schmidt of the Harvard Business School and one anonymous reviewer for their constructive comments on an earlier version of this paper. Introduction the passenger cabin, offering substantial improvement to the flying experience. Also, the lightweight composite Since the U.S. government deregulated air travel in 1977, materials enable the Dreamliner to take long-haul flights. more airlines have entered the market causing fierce Consequently, the Dreamliner allows airlines to offer price competition. As airfares continued to decline, the direct/nonstop flights between any pair of cities without total number of U.S. passengers per year has risen from layovers, which is preferred by most international approximately 240 million to 640 million from 1977 to travelers (Hucko, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Trent Series Large Turbo Fan Engines
    Technical Description Development of Trent Series Large Turbo Fan Engines As the demand for aircraft has been increasing, fuel efficiency needs to be improved. Therefore, the performance of the engine as well as the fuselage must be enhanced. We are in charge of design, part manufacturing and module assembly of the intermediate pressure compressor (IPC) at development of all the Trent Series large turbo fan engines from Rolls-Royce after the Trent 1000, the first model of which helped develop in 2004, as their strategic partner. Going forward, we will promote activities to take charge of the overall IPC module as an IPC module integrator by developing ©Rolls-Royce plc proprietary design and manufacturing technologies. Introduction Aircraft are an essential means of transportation in To be launched in 2018 global society, and aircraft manufacturers are competing Trent 7000 Thrust: to develop new types of aircraft. Engines equipping such 68,000-72,000lb Airbus A330neo aircraft must be highly reliable, lightweight and fuel efficient, as well as environmentally friendly (low NOx, low Trent XWB noise). Thrust: 84,000-97,000lb Airbus A350 XWB 1 Background Trent 1000 The demand for aircraft is expected to grow by about Thrust: 53,000-74,000lb 5% annually even in the long term, pushed by factors Boeing 787 such as the rapid expansion of Low-Cost Carriers (LCCs). To meet such market needs, The Boeing Company in the Trent 900 US and Airbus in Europe are developing new types of Thrust: 80,000lb aircraft. Rolls-Royce plc (Rolls-Royce) in the UK, one of the Airbus A380 world's major aircraft engine manufacturers, has been developing and supplying its Trent series for such aircraft, Trent 500 Thrust: and we are participating in programs to manufacture the 60,000lb series as a Risk- and Revenue-Sharing Partner (RRSP).
    [Show full text]
  • Decision-Making at Work: Qf32 and You
    THE LONG READ DECISION-MAKING AT WORK: QF32 AND YOU Steven Shorrock reflects on a conversation with Captain Richard Champion de Crespigny. What else might pilots, air traffic controllers, and others who work complex technology learn? During a normal flight, many goals deviance. They have allowed their below the level of language. So if you're need to be balanced. Minutes into the knowledge and skills acquired over many operating in your area of expertise and QF32 flight, commercial goals were no years to degrade or become legacy.” you’ve got a gut feeling, then it’s probably longer part of the equation. Safety and Sometimes, he said, experience can be intuition that should be believed. passenger wellbeing fully occupied the a curse. However, if you've got a gut feeling that's minds of the cockpit and cabin crew. not in your area of expertise, then it may Still, trade-offs had to be made. The Referring to HindSight magazine be based upon biases and illusions from crew had to make trade-offs between and other publications, he said our fast mind that could be wrong.” shorter-term and longer-term goals, that experience is only good when between thoroughness and efficiency, combined with a personal commitment A more deliberate decision-making between monitoring and acting, to a lifetime of learning. “You need process is the ‘ramp technique’. This between compliance and creativity, to read books and you need to read involves first asking the most junior between diagnosing components and magazines like HindSight. Everyone person what they think, so that they understanding whole systems, between must commit to a lifetime of learning to won't be intimidated by the more senior a focus on what wasn’t working and understand what's happened in the past, team members.
    [Show full text]
  • CO2 EMISSIONS from COMMERCIAL AVIATION: 2013, 2018, and 2019 Down from Nearly 19% in 2013
    OCTOBER 2020 CO2 EMISSIONS FROM COMMERCIAL AVIATION 2013, 2018, AND 2019 BRANDON GRAVER, PH.D., DAN RUTHERFORD, PH.D., AND SOLA ZHENG ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Jennifer Callahan and Dale Hall (ICCT), Tim Johnson (Aviation Environment Federation), and Andrew Murphy (Transport & Environment) for their review. This work was conducted with generous support from the Aspen Global Change Institute. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA Additional country-specific operations and CO2 emissions data for 2013, 2018, and 2019 can be found on the ICCT website. International Council on Clean Transportation 1500 K Street NW, Suite 650, Washington, DC 20005 [email protected] | www.theicct.org | @TheICCT © 2020 International Council on Clean Transportation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Last year, the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) developed a bottom-up, global aviation inventory to better understand carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from commercial aviation in 2018. This report updates the operations and emissions analyses for calendar year 2018 based on improved source data, and includes new analyses for 2013 and 2019. In 2013, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) requested its technical experts develop a global CO2 emissions standard for aircraft, and states began to submit voluntary action plans to reduce CO2 emissions from aviation. This paper details a global, transparent, and geographically allocated CO2 inventory for three years of commercial aviation, using operations data from OAG Aviation Worldwide Limited, ICAO, individual airlines, and the Piano aircraft emissions modeling software. Our Global Aviation Carbon Assessment (GACA) model estimated CO2 emissions from global passenger and cargo operations on par with totals reported by industry (Figure ES-1). In all three analyzed years, passenger flights were responsible for approximately 85% of commercial aviation CO2 emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • A380 Operational Evaluation
    EUROPEAN AVIATION SAFETY AGENCY Operational Evaluation Board Report Airbus A380-800 Report of the FCL/OPS Subgroup Report, Revision 1 18 July 2011 European Aviation Safety Agency Postfach 10 12 53 D-50452 Köln Germany EASA Operational Evaluation Board Airbus A380 – FCL & OPS Subgroup Airbus A380-800 Operational Evaluation Board (OEB) – OPS / FCL Subgroup Captain Herbert Meyer Section Manager, Large Aircraft Flight Standards Department, EASA Certification Directorate Revision Record Rev. No. Content Date Original A380-800 new evaluation 27 Oct 2008 1 A380-800 Three Engine Ferry Flight Draft: 05 May 2011 incorporated Final: 18 Jul 2011 A380 OEB, Revision 01 page 2 EASA Operational Evaluation Board Airbus A380 – FCL & OPS Subgroup Contents Acronyms 5 Operation Evaluation Board – FCL & OPS Subgroup 6 Preamble 7 Subgroup Composition 8 Executive Summary 9 Operational Evaluation Report – FCL & OPS Subgroup 12 1 Purpose and Applicability 12 2 Pilot Type rating requirements 13 3 Airbus family concept and A380 specifics 14 4 Master Differences Requirements tables (MDR) 17 5 Operator Differences Requirements Tables (ODR) 19 6 Specification for Training 19 6.1 Initial Transition course – A380 Type Rating 19 6.1.1 Prerequisites 19 6.1.2 Training areas of special emphasis 20 6.1.3 A380 Type rating – Standard Transition course 22 6.1.4 A380 Type rating courses - CCQ 22 6.2 Familiarization course 23 6.3 Low visibility training 23 6.4 Recurrent training 24 7 Specification for Checking 24 7.1 Skill test following type-rating courses 24 7.2 Recurrent Checks
    [Show full text]
  • New Generation Aircraft Like the A380 and Boeing 787
    New generation aircraft like the A380 and Boeing 787 Dreamliner are facilitating aviation growth at Sydney Airport with improved noise and environmental outcomes for the community. The noise footprint of the Dreamliner is 60% smaller than similarly sized aircraft and it consumes 20% less fuel. 14.0 NOISE MANAGEMENT 14.0 NOISE MANAGEMENT Key points • For most of the world’s major airports – including on behalf of Sydney Airport in materials submitted to Sydney – aircraft noise has been a longstanding Airservices Australia to support the preparation of the issue. Sydney Airport acknowledges noise impacts Australian Noise Exposure Forecast (ANEF) 2033 and is committed to working with the community, • New flight procedures and technologies, which are governments and the aviation industry to manage already being used at Brisbane Airport, could be used and mitigate them, especially in areas close to the at Sydney Airport to further mitigate aircraft noise airport and under flight paths impacts. For example, smart tracking and continuous • Aircraft and engine manufacturers invest descent approaches could be used to reduce noise in billions of dollars every year into research and areas around the airport or under flight paths development of new technologies to improve • This Master Plan assumes there will be no change the noise performance of aircraft. As a result, the to operating restrictions like the curfew, movement International Civil Aviation Organisation has said cap or noise sharing arrangements and no new flight that aircraft coming off the production line today paths or runways. However, modernising some of are about 75% quieter than they were 40 years these restrictions to recognise and take advantage of ago.
    [Show full text]