DOCSLIB.ORG

Brent Local Implementation Plan 2007

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Brent Local Implementation Plan 2007 CHAPTER 5 London Borough of Brent LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN POLICIES AND PROPOSALS Contents Section Introduction A Strategies 4 Sections B, C and D: Public transport—Context 31 B London Underground 36 C Rail 40 D Bus 51 E Streets 62 F Car user 94 G Walking 100 H Cycling 110 I Freight 120 J Water 130 K Taxis, Private Hire and Community Transport 131 L Accessible Transport 135 M Integration 141 N Major Projects N/A Maps 1 London Plan Key Diagram (West London Sub-region) 2 Public Transport Accessibility Levels 3 Network Holes 4 LBPN, London Underground, National Rail, Interchange and NORP lines. 5 Area-based schemes 6 CPZ’s and off-street car parks 7 Walking map: public rights of way, Capital Ring, Blue Ribbon (River Brent; Grand Union Canal). 8 Brent’s Cyclists’ network 9 London Cycle Network + including links 10 Regeneration Areas 11 Indices of Multiple Deprivation—map Programme Forms-1, Form 2 and Table 12.1 in Appendix 2 Introduction The London Borough of Brent is committed to the sustainable management of its transport network in accordance with the London Plan 2004, the Mayor’s Transport Strategy 2001 and other relevant Mayoral policy documents. The Mayor of London, through Transport for London, is responsible for regional transport planning decisions as well as for cross-cutting strategies dealing with spatial development (the London Plan), economic development, air quality, biodiversity, noise, waste and culture. 1 The boroughs, including Brent, play a key role in the planning and delivery of transport in the capital ranging from land use planning policies and decisions through to controlling 95 per cent of London’s streets. Almost all journeys in the Capital are affected in one way or another by a borough transport role. 2 This Local Implementation Plan sets out the Borough’s policies and proposals in response to the Mayor’s Transport Strategy 2001, in which Policy 5.4 states that: Partnership will be sought with the London boroughs in developing and implementing transport policies and plans. The London boroughs are required to set out their proposals for the implementation of the Transport Strategy in their areas. Local Implementation Plans (LIPs) will reflect the Transport Strategy’s objectives, policies, proposals and priorities. The Mayor will issue guidance to the London boroughs setting out detailed requirements for their LIPs. Guidance will ensure the LIPs implement the Transport Strategy, are co-ordinated with each other and with the plans of other implementation agencies, and are effectively implemented and monitored. If necessary, the Mayor will issue directions to ensure the Transport Strategy is implemented. 3 This chapter sets out the Council’s policies and proposals for transport, in the context of the five cross-cutting goals: 1. Promoting safety and the perception of safety for all travel modes; 2. Encouraging sustainable means for travel; 3. Balanced road space allocation; 4. Requirements for Sustainable Developments; and 5. Equality and inclusion, particularly in relation to target groups. Structure of this Chapter 4 This chapter is divided into 12 subsections labelled A-K. Each subsection contains a review of relevant background policies and other supporting contextual information. This is followed by the Council’s response to each of the policies in the Mayor’s Transport Strategy (MTS). Many of the responses make reference to completed proposals forms, maps, technical appendices and other information that are contained in Volume 2 of the LIP. 5 Each relevant policy and proposal from the Mayor’s Transport Strategy is set out below, together with the Council’s response, for example: 2 3.Po1 The paragraph ‘number’ to the left refers to the relevant MTS policy or proposal. Bold text in this paragraph is either the Council’s Policy or Proposal response or a heading for the subsequent numbered paragraphs. If there is more than one part to the policy or proposal, a Roman numeral is placed in brackets after the policy number, e.g.: 3.Po1 (I); 3.Po1 (II) etc. 3.Po1 (1) This and subsequent paragraphs set out the Council’s response to the MTS policy. They are numbered with the policy or proposal reference as a prefix. The same numbering continues through any multi-part policy responses. 3.Po1 (2) Any programme forms, appendices and other references (in Volume 2) to which the policy / proposal response refers are generally listed in the final paragraph of the policy or proposal, although occasionally they may be found in other paragraphs. Example: Programme E4 Road Danger Reduction Schemes. 3 Section A Strategies. National Policies A1 The objectives and strategic policies contained in the Unitary Development Plan, Interim Local Implementation Plan and annual Borough Spending Plans to 2005/6 were prepared in the years following the 1998 Government White Paper on Integrated Transport. The emphasis of the White Paper was to reduce the environmental impact of motor transport, by reducing the need to travel, particularly by car. A2 The 1998 White Paper remains Government policy as expressed in Planning Policy Guidance Note 13 (Transport), however it was replaced with a new White Paper in July 2004, titled The Future of Transport – a Network for 2030, which conceded to demands for additional road building and a relaxation of the progressive aims of the 1998 White Paper. The 2004 Traffic Management Act. A3 The Traffic Management Act 2004 seeks to provide better conditions for all road users and reduce congestion through the management of the road network. The Act includes a duty on all highway authorities to appoint a Traffic Manager whose role it will be to keep traffic (including motorised and non-motorised modes) moving and to draw up a plan that shows how the Council will respond to its Network Management Duty. London Plan—strategic context A4 The London Plan was finalised in 2004 and sets out the strategic development strategy for land use planning in London. The plan states that London’s transport needs are not simply local, but also national and international. Improvements in access to airports, international rail stations and the Channel Tunnel are necessary to match London’s growth and economic pre-eminence. Public transport has an essential role to play in both national and local travel; key projects and proposals include for example, Crossrail, Thameslink 2000, the Docklands Light Railway extension, bus and tram schemes and river crossing schemes. Improved provision of public transport across London plays an important part in easing congestion and making better use of London’s streets. A5 The integration of land use and transport planning is key to London’s development. The London Plan integrates both of these into its spatial development strategy, and the Mayor’s Transport Strategy sets out a fifteen year programme for planning and investment in partnership with the 33 London local authorities. The first section of the London Plan’s transport chapter sets out the Mayor’s policies with regard to the integration of transport and land use planning: • Policy 3C.1 states with regard to the integration of transport and development, that: “The Mayor will work with TfL, the Strategic Rail Authority, the government, boroughs and other partners to ensure the integration of transport and land use development by: 4 - encouraging patterns and forms of development that reduce the need to travel, especially by car; - seeking to improve public transport capacity and accessibility where it is needed, for areas of greatest demand and areas designated for development and regeneration including… opportunity areas, areas for intensification and town centres; - in general, supporting high trip generating development only at locations with both high levels of public transport accessibility and capacity, sufficient to meet the transport requirements of the development. Parking provision should reflect levels of public transport accessibility…” • Policy 3C.2 sets out the plan’s approach to matching development to transport capacity at corridor and local level and includes a requirement for developments with significant transport implications to include transport assessments and travel plans as part of their planning applications; • Policy 3C.3 states that the Mayor and strategic partners will support walking, cycling and public transport accessibility improvements to and within town centres and their residential hinterlands and improved sustainable accessibility between centres and employment areas; • Policy 3C.4 states that UDPs (LDFs) should ensure the supply of sufficient land for the development of an expanded transport function to serve the economic, social and environmental needs of London. Other policies • Policy 3D.4 and 5 state the Mayor’s commitment to supporting culture in the context of the Mayor’s Cultural Strategy, tourism and the development of London’s sporting facilities in the context of a sequential approach to development, ensuring high levels of public transport and active travel mode accessibility. Wembley Stadium is identified as a Strategic Cultural Area. Draft Sub-regional Development Framework—West London A6 The Sub-regional development framework brings together a wide range of data and information about West London and makes suggestions to the boroughs of issues they should address in the preparation of their Local Development Frameworks and other planning policy documents. The frameworks are an important stage in the implementation of the London Plan. With regard to transport and accessibility, the plan states that people in West Londonmake some four million trips in an average weekday, just over half of which are made by car; 30 per cent are by walking or cycling and 16% are by public transport. Approximately ten per cent of trips are to central London. Key issues of relevance to Brent include: • West London Line enhancements—links between Willesden Junction and Clapham Junction with new stations planned as part of wider measures to improve orbital travel; 5 • Significant upgrades to London Underground services including upgrades to stations, rolling stock, line capacity and reliability.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Speed Rail
    House of Commons Transport Committee High Speed Rail Tenth Report of Session 2010–12 Volume III Additional written evidence Ordered by the House of Commons to be published 24 May, 7, 14, 21 and 28 June, 12 July, 6, 7 and 13 September and 11 October 2011 Published on 8 November 2011 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited The Transport Committee The Transport Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for Transport and its Associate Public Bodies. Current membership Mrs Louise Ellman (Labour/Co-operative, Liverpool Riverside) (Chair) Steve Baker (Conservative, Wycombe) Jim Dobbin (Labour/Co-operative, Heywood and Middleton) Mr Tom Harris (Labour, Glasgow South) Julie Hilling (Labour, Bolton West) Kwasi Kwarteng (Conservative, Spelthorne) Mr John Leech (Liberal Democrat, Manchester Withington) Paul Maynard (Conservative, Blackpool North and Cleveleys) Iain Stewart (Conservative, Milton Keynes South) Graham Stringer (Labour, Blackley and Broughton) Julian Sturdy (Conservative, York Outer) The following were also members of the committee during the Parliament. Angie Bray (Conservative, Ealing Central and Acton) Lilian Greenwood (Labour, Nottingham South) Kelvin Hopkins (Labour, Luton North) Gavin Shuker (Labour/Co-operative, Luton South) Angela Smith (Labour, Penistone and Stocksbridge) Powers The committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the internet via www.parliament.uk. Publication The Reports and evidence of the Committee are published by The Stationery Office by Order of the House.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line
    List of Accessible Overground Stations Grouped by Overground Line Legend: Page | 1 = Step-free access street to platform = Step-free access street to train This information was correct at time of publication. Please check Transport for London for further information regarding station access. This list was compiled by Benjamin Holt, Transport for All 29/05/2019. Canada Water Step-free access street to train East London line Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Dalston Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Junction - New New Cross Step-free access street to platform Cross Canada Water Step-free access street to platform Clapham High Street Step-free access street to platform Denmark Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to platform Peckham Rye Step-free access street to platform Queens Road Peckham Step-free access street to platform East London line Rotherhithe Step-free access street to platform Shadwell Step-free access street to platform Dalston Canada Water Step-free access street to train Junction - Canonbury Step-free access street to train Clapham Crystal Palace Step-free access street to platform Junction Dalston Junction Step-free access street to train Forest Hill Step-free access street to platform Haggerston Step-free access street to train Highbury & Islington Step-free access street to platform Honor Oak Park Step-free access street to platform Hoxton Step-free access street to train New Cross Gate Step-free access street to platform
    [Show full text]
  • Abbey Line Report 060615
    Hertfordshire County Council Abbey Line Passenger Survey FINAL REPORT June 2006 The Railway Consultancy Ltd 1st Floor, South Tower Crystal Palace Station London SE19 2AZ Tel. 020-8676 0395 Fax. 020-8778 7439 1 Executive Summary E1 The Abbey Line between Watford Junction and St Albans Abbey is a single-track Community Rail Partnership (CRP) line. Although currently operated by Silverlink, the line is to be part of the new West Midlands franchise, due to commence on 11 November 2007. The Community Rail Partnership is seeking to increase the frequency of services on the route, to a half-hourly level, thus requiring a second trainset and passing loop to be installed. The CRP therefore commissioned The Railway Consultancy to undertake a series of passenger counts and surveys of passenger travel patterns, in order to provide a basis on which business planning might be undertaken. E2 Analysis of passenger usage on the line was based upon surveying all weekday and weekend services once during May 2006. This encompassed the counting and alighting of boarders at every Abbey Line station and a series of on-train counts. In addition, a questionnaire was distributed to passengers. A total of 1300 forms were distributed; by the closing date of 9 th June 2006, a total of 496 survey forms were returned completed, representing a response rate of 38%. E3 Count data across the survey period revealed that passenger numbers on the line were somewhat disappointing. The total number of boarders (i.e. across both directions) for weekdays, Saturdays and Sundays were respectively around 1300, 1000 and 450 per day.
    [Show full text]
  • Convent-Of-Jesus-And-Mary-Prospectus-2020-21.Pdf
    Convent of Jesus and Mary Language College Welcome Bem-vinda Swagat Witamy Maraming salamat Daghang salamat Boyei bolamu Chào mùừng Bienvenidas Bienvenue Üdvözöljük Yevkar Huān yíng A very warm welcome to the Convent of Jesus and Mary; We are also very proud of our international community at the a high-performing and aspirational school for girls and one Convent; we have children and staff from all over the world of very few all-girls schools in the north-west area of London. joining together as one united school family. Our Research We are very proud of the academic achievements of all School pioneers work to promote social and racial justice our girls: those who pursue their routes into medicine, law, and equality, and our unique Student Parliament prepares accountancy and business and those who flourish in our girls to stand up for what they believe in with a voice the arts, literature, the humanities and sports. Our girls leave rooted in educated, universal values and spirit. Many of us to attend top universities, including Oxford, Cambridge our girls go on to forge careers in international relations as and Russell Group universities. Our unique international a result of their Convent education, with a wish to make a programme enables our girls to study abroad with routes to positive difference in the world. Ivy League colleges in the USA on fully-funded scholarships. We champion girls and believe that an all-girls education Ethos We are a Catholic school, founded in the 19th century, provides an important foundation for nurturing and on a very special mission to educate girls to the highest strengthening the confidence and aspirations and the voices We nurture each of our girls to become confident, resilient Our History level and prepare them to take their places in the world as of women of the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokyngton Wards Are Major Destinations in Themselves in Addition to Being Residential Areas
    ELECTORAL REVIEW OF THE LONDON BOROUGH OF BRENT WARDING PATTERN SUBMISSION BY THE BRENT CONSERVATIVE GROUP RESPONSE TO THE LGBCE CONSULTATION NOVEMBER 2018 1 | P a g e Introduction Why Brent? During the current London Government Boundary Commission Executive (LGBCE) review process, it has become clear to us that since the previous review in 2000, warding levels have developed out of balance. Brent Council meets the Commission’s criteria for electoral inequality with 7 wards having a variance outside 10%. The outliers are Brondesbury Park at -16% and Tokyngton at 28%. Electoral review process The electoral review will have two distinct parts: Council size – The Brent conservative group welcomes to reduce the number of councillors to 57 from current 63. We appreciate that this will require some existing wards to be redrawn, and recognise that this will represent an opportunity to examine whether the existing boundaries are an appropriate reflection of how Brent has developed since 2000. In addition, the establishment of new developments such as South Kilburn Regeneration, Wembley Regeneration, Alperton and Burnt Oak and Colindale area. Ward boundaries – The Commission will re-draw ward boundaries so that they meet their statutory criteria. Should the Commission require any further detail on our scheme we would be very happy to pass on additional information or to arrange a meeting with Commission members or officers to run through the proposals. 2 | P a g e Interests & identities of local communities The Commission will be looking for evidence on a range of issues to support our reasoning. The best evidence for community identity is normally a combination of factual information such as the existence of communication links, facilities and organisations along with an explanation of how local people use those facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Class 313 User Manual
    OPERATIONAL NOTICE Temporary Working for Silverlink Class 313 EMUs on the North and West London Lines Issued on: 12/06/2006 Valid until: UFN Issued by: John Maninsuit Page 1 of 12 The Route The North London Line and West London Line for BVE is an early beta. This route will eventually continue on to North Woolwich with the addition of other features planned in the future. It is modelled as it would have looked during 2004 – 2006 in the height of the Silverlink Metro era just before the closure of the section to North Woolwich. In 2007 it became part of TFL as part of their London Overground network and was extensively modernised beyond recognition shortly thereafter. The Train Our train is a class 313 EMU built by British Rail Engineering Limited (BREL) at the Holgate Road Carriage Works between 1976 and 1977. Originally designed for the Great Northern lines, they were used on various routes during their many years of service. Some were transferred to the North London Line during the 1980s and were inherited by Silverlink Trains after privatisation. In addition, these trains are used on the West London and Watford DC Lines as well as the St Albans Abbey – Watford Junction service. Controls (default keys) In addition to the default keys within BVE there are additional features on this train. Most of these are similar to standard BR stock within BVE. The specific details are as follows: Key Function 2 Pan Down 3 AC Mode Select/Dual Voltage Alarm Cancel 4 Tail lights On/Off 5 Headlamp/Marker lights On/Off 6 Driver/Guard Bell 7 Wind Destination Blind Forward 9 Pan Up/Set Reset End Instrument Lights On/Off Insert Acknowledge AWS & TPWS Page up TPWS Temporary Override/Tripcock Reset Page Down Key Out/Set Cut Out (DC Mode only) Space DRA On/Off This guide assumes you are using the default keys assigned by BVE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transport Committee's Review of the North London Railway March
    Transport Committee London’s Forgotten Railway The Transport Committee’s review of the North London Railway March 2006 Transport Committee London’s Forgotten Railway The Transport Committee’s review of the North London Railway March 2006 copyright Greater London Authority March 2006 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries 020 7983 4100 minicom 020 7983 4458 ISBN 1 85261 852 3 This publication is printed on recycled paper The Transport Committee Roger Evans - Chairman (Conservative) Geoff Pope - Deputy Chair (Liberal Democrat) John Biggs - Labour Angie Bray - Conservative Elizabeth Howlett - Conservative Peter Hulme Cross - One London Darren Johnson - Green Murad Qureshi - Labour Graham Tope - Liberal Democrat The Transport Committee’s general terms of reference are to examine and report on transport matters of importance to Greater London and the transport strategies, policies and actions of the Mayor, Transport for London, and the other Functional Bodies where appropriate. In particular, the Transport Committee is also required to examine and report to the Assembly from time to time on the Mayor’s Transport Strategy, in particular its implementation and revision. The terms of reference as agreed by the Transport Committee on 20th October 2005 for this scrutiny were: • To survey the current state of the North London Line and the Gospel Oak- Barking line in terms of service frequency, reliability, rolling stock, safety and amenity on stations and station approaches. • To gather and consider the views of Boroughs, business communities, rail passengers, campaign groups and other stakeholders on how they would wish these rail lines to be upgraded and improved.
    [Show full text]
  • North Acton Station Feasibility Study LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY
    North Acton Station Feasibility Study LOCAL PLAN SUPPORTING STUDY 2017 29. North Acton Station Feasibility Study Document Title North Acton Station Feasibility Study Lead Author Steer Davies Gleave Purpose of the Study This study investigates the options for enhancing the capacity and accessibility of North Acton station and the options for improving the permeability of the site. Key outputs • A phased delivery plan which includes making the station DDA compliant, increasing the capacity of the station and providing a connection to the station from the north. Key recommendations • North Acton station is expected to be subject to significant additional demand due to the large scale development that will surround the station. • The existing station is already straining under current demand. As such reconfiguration to provide both additional capacity and step free access is key. • Providing access to the station from the north is fundamental as development comes forward. Relations to other Interfaces with the Old Oak Strategic Transport Study and the Park Royal Transport Strategy studies Relevant Local Plan • Interfaces with the Old Oak Strategic Transport Study and the Park Royal Transport Strategy Policies and Chapters North Acton Interchange Final Report Transport for London January 2016 1 Introduction Introduction Scope Previous Studies Timescales Policy Context 2 Strategic Transport Context Existing public transport in the area Future transport improvement schemes Other local improvements 3 Growth Areas and Demand Location of future
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Background Paper
    THREE RIVERS TRANSPORT BACKGROUND STUDY UPDATE FEBRUARY 2011 CONTENTS Page 1 Introduction 1 2 Policy Background 1 2.1 European Context 1 2.1.1 A Sustainable Future for Transport 1 2.2 National Context 2 2.2.1 Towards a Sustainable Transport System 2 2.2.2 Delivering a Sustainable Transport System 2 2.2.3 Planning Policy Guidance 13: Transport 3 2.2.4 National Cycling Strategy 3 2.2.5 Walking and Cycling: An Action Plan 3 2.3 Regional Context 3 2.3.1 Regional Spatial Strategy 3 2.3.2 Regional Transport Strategy 4 2.4 Hertfordshire Context 4 2.4.1 County Structure Plan 4 2.4.2 Local Transport Plan 5 2.4.3 Bus Strategy 6 2.4.4 Rail Strategy 7 2.4.5 Rights of Way Improvement Plan 7 2.4.6 Road Safety Plan 8 2.4.7 Accessibility Strategy 8 2.4.8 Long Term Strategy 9 2.4.9 Hertfordshire Infrastructure and Investment Strategy 10 2.4.9.1 HIIS Bus Network 10 2.4.9.2 HIIS Rail Network 10 2.4.9.3 HIIS Road Network to 2011 10 2.4.9.4 HIIS Freight 11 2.4.9.5 HIIS Programmed Infrastructure Schemes 11 2.4.10 Hertfordshire Bus Network Review 11 2.5 Local Context 11 2.5.1 South West Hertfordshire Transport Plan Review and Action Plan 11 2.5.2 Community Strategy 13 2.5.3 Three Rivers Local Plan 13 2.5.4 Three Rivers Cycling Strategy 14 3 Transport in Three Rivers 15 3.1 Road Network 15 3.2 Rail Network 15 3.3 Bus Network 16 3.4 Cycle Network 16 3.5 Pedestrian Network 17 3.6 Waterways Network 17 3.7 Air Transport 18 3.8 Transport Statistics 18 3.8.1 Car Ownership 18 3.8.2 Travel to Work 19 3.8.3 Traffic Flows 22 3.8.4 Road Safety 23 3.8.5 Environment 23 4 Current/ Potential Specific Transport Schemes in Three Rivers 23 4.1 CrossRail 23 4.2 Croxley Rail Link 24 4.3 M25 Widening 25 4.4 Watford Junction Improvements 25 5 Future Transport in Three Rivers 25 1 INTRODUCTION In March 2007, a transport background study was carried out to assess European, national, regional and local policy context for the development of transport of transport policies in Three Rivers, and to assess the current levels of provision and usage of different transport modes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Privatisation of British Railways on the Satisfaction Levels of Passengers
    UNIVERSITY OF WALES--- Trinity Saint David London 1HE EFFECT OF PRIVITISATION OF BRITISH RAILWAYS ON THE SATISFACTION LEVELS OF PASSENGERS: A CASE STUDY OF LONDON OVERGROUND BY ECHEVICTOR EBUTE SUPERVISORS DRDABA CHOWDHURY DR JOHN-PAUL OKEKE SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENTFOR 1HE AWARD OF THEDEGREE OF DOCTOR OF BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION UNIVERSITY OF WALES TRINITYSAINT DAVID NOVEMBER2019 DEDICATION I dedicate this work to Almighty God for his grace and mercies upon my life, for sparing my life and for the completion of this thesis. To my lovely son Rosh Ebute and my sweetheart: Elssie Ebute. To my mom: Stella Ebute, family members, friends and well-wishers. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This has been a journey of learning and personal development. My gratitude to all my lecturers, friends and family who have supported me all through my studies. I am grateful to my supervisors: Dr Daba Chowdhury and Dr John-Paul Okeke. I thank you for your immense support, inspiration, continuous encouragement and constructive feedback. I feel priviledged to have been mentored by you. I look forward to more fruitful collaborations. Words cannot express my profound gratitude to my mother, Mrs Stella Ebute who has been a source of inspiration in my life with her untiring efforts, despite all odds to see that am lifted to the expected end. I promise to always live to make the entire family proud. To my loved ones; Eche Rosh Ebute (Junior), Elssie Ebute (sweetheart), Emma Ejeba and family, Pedro Abah and family. MY heart felt appreciation also goes to Senator Ameh Ebute for your fatherly advice, support and care for the entire family.
    [Show full text]
  • METROS/U-BAHN Worldwide
    METROS DER WELT/METROS OF THE WORLD STAND:31.12.2020/STATUS:31.12.2020 ّ :جمهورية مرص العرب ّية/ÄGYPTEN/EGYPT/DSCHUMHŪRIYYAT MISR AL-ʿARABIYYA :القاهرة/CAIRO/AL QAHIRAH ( حلوان)HELWAN-( المرج الجديد)LINE 1:NEW EL-MARG 25.12.2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jmr5zRlqvHY DAR EL-SALAM-SAAD ZAGHLOUL 11:29 (RECHTES SEITENFENSTER/RIGHT WINDOW!) Altamas Mahmud 06.11.2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6xG3hZccyg EL-DEMERDASH-SADAT (LINKES SEITENFENSTER/LEFT WINDOW!) 12:29 Mahmoud Bassam ( المنيب)EL MONIB-( ش ربا)LINE 2:SHUBRA 24.11.2017 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-UCJA6bVKQ8 GIZA-FAYSAL (LINKES SEITENFENSTER/LEFT WINDOW!) 02:05 Bassem Nagm ( عتابا)ATTABA-( عدىل منصور)LINE 3:ADLY MANSOUR 21.08.2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t7m5Z9g39ro EL NOZHA-ADLY MANSOUR (FENSTERBLICKE/WINDOW VIEWS!) 03:49 Hesham Mohamed ALGERIEN/ALGERIA/AL-DSCHUMHŪRĪYA AL-DSCHAZĀ'IRĪYA AD-DĪMŪGRĀTĪYA ASCH- َ /TAGDUDA TAZZAYRIT TAMAGDAYT TAỴERFANT/ الجمهورية الجزائرية الديمقراطيةالشعبية/SCHA'BĪYA ⵜⴰⴳⴷⵓⴷⴰ ⵜⴰⵣⵣⴰⵢⵔⵉⵜ ⵜⴰⵎⴰⴳⴷⴰⵢⵜ ⵜⴰⵖⴻⵔⴼⴰⵏⵜ : /DZAYER TAMANEỴT/ دزاير/DZAYER/مدينة الجزائر/ALGIER/ALGIERS/MADĪNAT AL DSCHAZĀ'IR ⴷⵣⴰⵢⴻⵔ ⵜⴰⵎⴰⵏⴻⵖⵜ PLACE DE MARTYRS-( ع ني نعجة)AÏN NAÂDJA/( مركز الحراش)LINE:EL HARRACH CENTRE ( مكان دي مارت بز) 1 ARGENTINIEN/ARGENTINA/REPÚBLICA ARGENTINA: BUENOS AIRES: LINE:LINEA A:PLACA DE MAYO-SAN PEDRITO(SUBTE) 20.02.2011 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfUmJPEcBd4 PIEDRAS-PLAZA DE MAYO 02:47 Joselitonotion 13.05.2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4lJAhBo6YlY RIO DE JANEIRO-PUAN 07:27 Así es BUENOS AIRES 4K 04.12.2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PoUNwMT2DoI
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX a Table 6.1 Indicative List of Transport Schemes Rail
    APPENDIX A Table 6.1 Indicative list of transport schemes cost Anticipated completion 2010- 2013- Post Scheme Description 2012* 2020† 2020 2013- 2017- Post 2016 21/22 2022 Rail Core scheme: Maidenhead and Heathrow in the west Crossrail 1 H to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east High Speed 1 International services stopping at Stratford L Direct services to a wider range of European High Speed 1 destinations (making use of new European L infrastructure) High Speed 2 London to the West Midlands and beyond. H High Speed 1 Enhanced Domestic Services L Improved rail freight New and/or expanded rail freight terminals to serve terminals to serve L London London Improved rail freight Rail link from Barking - Gospel Oak line to West Coast M routes Main Line Improved rail freight Further capacity enhancement for the Felixstowe - M routes Nuneaton route Westerly extension(s) potentially to Reading/Milton Crossrail 1 Keynes/ Watford/ Staines (via Airtrack) and/or M extensions additional services to Heathrow and West Drayton Easterly extension from Abbey Wood - Gravesend Crossrail 2 Enhanced southwest – northeast London capacity and (formerly Chelsea connectivity. Scheme detail to be reviewed to ensure H Hackney line) maximum benefits and value for money London Overground- Scheme to provide a fifth carriage (and Capacity associated infrastructure works on the north, M Improvement west and east London lines, as well as the Euston Programme – Watford ‘DC’ line) London Overground Further train lengthening L Diversion of Watford services to Stratford (instead of London Overground M Euston) to release capacity for High Speed 2 at Euston Programme of expansion and enhancement of services London Overground M all completed by 2012 Barking - Gospel Oak line – electrification and train London Overground L lengthening London Overground Extension from Barking to Barking Riverside M West Anglia 12 car capability to Stansted and Cambridge L Stratford –Angel Road capacity enhancement to West Anglia M enable the running of 4 trains per hour.
    [Show full text]