DOCSLIB.ORG

Riga Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 Kandava Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

RIGA PLANNING REGION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2030 KANDAVA MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY RIGA REGION SALACGRĪVAS LIMBAŽI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI ENGURE MUNICIPALITY ĀDAŽI MUNICIPALITY ALOJA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA KRIMULDA MUNICIPALITY RĪGA CITY INČUKALNS MUNICIPALITY SIGULDA MUNICIPALITY TUKUMS MUNICIPALITY JŪRMALA CITY GARKALNE MUNICIPALITY SĒJA MUNICIPALITY ROPAŽI MUNICIPALITY BABĪTE MUNICIPALITY STOPIŅI MUNICIPALITY MĀLPILS MUNICIPALITY The booklet is nanced by the SALASPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Financial Mechanism programme 2009–2014 No. LV 07 “Capacity-building and Institutional Cooperation between Latvian and JAUNPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Public Institutions, Local and MĀRUPE MUNICIPALITY IKŠĶILE MUNICIPALITY OGRE MUNICIPALITY Regional Authorities” project No. 4.3–24/NFI/INP–002 “Increasing territorial development planning capacities of planning regions and local governments of Latvia and elaboration of development planning documents” LIELVĀRDE MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA BALDONE MUNICIPALITY BALDONE ĶEGUMS MUNICIPALITY OLAINE MUNICIPALITY Activity and Functions General Information of the Region about the Region The regional level of governance ensures a connection between the national and local level of governance through the function of coordination. In this way the region is capable of covering the issues, which exceed the borders of one local government, and in the same time it denes the demand for territorial solutions of national level. Governance Entrepreneurship and investments The administration established by the Riga Planning The Riga Regional Entrepreneurship Centre operates Area Population Number of local Region (RPR) Development Council ensures the within the region, the activities of which are aimed governments execution of the decisions taken by the Development towards implementing entrepreneurship promotion 10 438 km2 1 089 960 Council, as well as organises the activity of the and support measures, as well as providing support for 16.2% of the total area 50.5% of the total 30 local governments Development Council. The task of the regional ecient acquisition of EU funds. of Latvia population of Latvia /TAPIS, 2015/ /PMLP, 2015/ administration is to ensure regional development Public transportation planning, coordination, collaboration between local Regional competency in the branch of public governments and other national governmental transportation is dened in the Law on Public institutions. Transportation Services, following which proposals on Planning and supervision necessary changes in the route network must be Regional competency within the framework of prepared. territorial development planning is set out in the Culture Regional Development Law, following which the Regions can delegate administrative tasks, which are main development directions, aims and priorities of within the competency of the direct governance the planning region must be dened, as well as institution. Up to this moment, the Ministry of Culture coordination and monitoring of the development is the only direct state government institution, which planning process must be carried out. has delegated execution of tasks in the cultural eld to Cities of national Development GDP Projects RPR through an agreement. signicance centres of regional 14 480 EUR The region develops and implements projects within Prospectively, it is possible to extend the activities signicance per 1 inhabitant the framework of regional development supporting (functions) of the planning region in such elds as Rīga, /CSP, 2012/ measures. Also, the projects realised by RPR is one social services, education, youth, tourism, and Jūrmala Tukums, Ogre, way of advancing the implementation of the energetics. The prerequisite for the implementation of Sigulda, Limbaži activities and reaching the results set out in the these is the delegation with following funding from regional planning documents. institutions of direct national governance. 7 Riga Planning Region is the capital region Special Values of Latvia. Its location in the centre of the Riga Region Baltic states, bordering with European and Eastern cultures, has formed Riga of Riga Region Region as a bridge between dierent countries and their population. The region is characterised by the dynamic capital city Rīga, wherein impacts of various nations have integrated naturally. Riga Planning Region proportion in Latvia (%) Other cities and towns of the region are also signicant – Jūrmala, Limbaži, Tukums, Ogre and Sigulda, as well as the rural environment that has not been industrially impacted. The special value of the region Area is the coast of the Riga Gulf of the Baltic Sea, which extends at a length of 185 km, as well as the internal water sources. Population The socio-economic, technological and scientic development of the region is GDP dened by a development centre of national, international and European signicance – the city of Rīga along with its agglomeration. The functional space Number of enterprises of the region noticeably surpasses the borders of the region, which also includes the territories of the surrounding regions Number of in the economic and spatial population employees distribution structure. Number of The strategically important location of students the region, high population retention and relatively high market capacity form the economic potential of the region and Foreign promote national growth. Rīga investments agglomeration holds the most signicant cultural, educational, scientic, sports, healthcare, and transport infrastructure 0 20 40 60 80 100 objects of the state. RIGA PLANNING REGION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2030 9 The Region’s Role Vision in Latvia and the Baltic Region People Rīga as a metropolis Population in the region is stable. A relatively low birth City of Rīga is a national and multicultural metropolis rate is compensated by reemigration and a positive of Northern Europe – the driving force of Latvia and migration balance. In the region, most of the population the region. Within the time of one generation, the role of working age have higher or vocational education, and of Rīga has increased: Rīga has become a powerful almost all of the population are involved in lifelong organising force that enhances prosperity and activity learning processes. The governance increases the in the region, Latvia and the Baltic States. It is number of various humane facilities, loosens legal developing as the most dynamically visible and united capacity, labour-intensiveness and cohesion of centre in the Baltics. Rīga stands out in the Baltic Sea communities for the purpose of achieving common region and the world owing to its distinctions in objectives. Within the average term, the region will several elds. The region with its centre in Rīga is both become an attractive area for skilled workers required on the Eurasian and north–south and east–west the market, as well as for immigrants. connection and logistics hub, as well as the place of business and cultural synergies. Values The role of the place and its vicinities has increased in Mobility regard to awareness and activity. The region’s residents The region is still developing a common transport are aware of their belonging to both the local and the system, whose core consists of all kinds of public regional cohabitation and behave responsibly towards it, transport networks that ensure geographically regular as well as feel safe due to interconnection and peer accessibility within the time conforming to the daily benevolence towards ethnic and cultural diversity. mobility requirements, in which the region is a unied working and living space. Smart development It is exible – based on knowledge, willingness to Areas change, activity, and respect to the place and global Taking into consideration the history of Rīga, it is processes. Wisdom is manifested in action, which is possible to say that in the future Rīga as a metropolis focused on self-suciency and balance of the location in will be linked with the areas surrounding it – the urban energy production and consumption. The distance from and green areas of the city's suburbs, the Gulf of Riga home to the workplace is constantly decreasing, along and its coasts. Each of the areas is characterised by a with the frequency of the use of vehicles. The region as a distinct value, a balance of nature and human Areas and directions of cooperation in the international interests of the Riga region whole and each place forms a system of green areas and activities, specialisation and sustainable use of green elements. resources. Riga Planning Region has a special and potentially increasable role on the international scale, primarily in the Distinctions The aspects conforming to the vision – the desired Baltic Sea Region. A big driving force for development of not only the Riga Planning Region but also the Areas of distinction of Riga Region are knowledge-based future status of Riga Region in planning and actions – whole of Latvia can be found in the potential of Rīga as an international metropolis, and this aspect should technologies, smart development technology, shall be consistently included in three strategically be taken into account more frequently in the future. In the network of metropolises – VASAB, Baltic Palette, biotechnologies, visual and acoustic art, quality of the important subjects: QUALITY, SMART DEVELOPMENT Via Hanseatica, Via Baltica and Rail Baltica – it is possible to serve as excellent platforms
Recommended publications
  • Minutes of the 2Nd Meeting of the Estonian-Latvian Working Group For

    Minutes of the 2Nd Meeting of the Estonian-Latvian Working Group For

    Minutes of the 2nd meeting of the Estonian-Latvian Working Group for determing, prioritizing and coordinating the list of road sections for reconstruction in the border area Participants: Mr Vents Armands Krauklis, Chairman of Valka municipality Mr Margus Lepik, Chairman of Valga municipality Mr Andris Zunde, Executive director of Salacgriva municipality Mr Jānis Liberts, Chairman of Ape municipality Mr Artūrs Dukulis, Chairman of Alūksne municipality Mr Enno Kase, Deputy Mayor for Municipal Property and Municipal Maintenance of Valga Municipality Mr Urmas Kuldmaa, Traffic and road specialist of Valga municipality Mr Valdis Barda, Chairman of Aloja municipality Mr Imre Jugomäe, Chairman of Mulgi municipality Mr Guntis Gladkins, Chairman of Rūjiena municipality Mr Gundars Kains, Director of Development Administration of Latvian State Roads Mr Hannes Nagel, Estonian Ministry of Finance AGENDA 1. Overview of the IGC agenda issue as of December 2019 (Information by Estonian Ministry of Finance) 2. Overview of the road section priorities from the national respective authority perspective (Information by the Latvian State Roads) 3. Round table discussion about the cooperation and solution perspectives in regard of covering the prioritized border area gravel road sections with black cover 4. Conclusions and decisions 5. Location and time of 3rd meeting of the working group 1. Overview of the IGC agenda issue as of December 2019 Mr Hannes Nagel of the Estonian Ministry of Finance informed the members of the informal working group about the progress after the November 6 Joint Session of the Estonian and Latvian Intergovernmental Commission. 2. Overview of the road section priorities from the national respective authority perspective Mr Gundars Kains of the Latvian State Roads informed the members of the informal working group about the Latvian national priorities and methodology which is being used to compile the national road renovation list.
  • Action Plan for Vidzeme Region

    Action Plan for Vidzeme Region

    Cult ural Routes as Investments for Growth and Jobs Action Plan for Vidzeme Region December 2018 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs _________________________ © Cult-RInG Project Partnership and Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-RInG Project Communication and the respective partner: Vidzeme Tourism Association. Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-RInG Action Plan, Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia Cult-RInG project communication unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source on e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Vidzeme Tourism Association and in no way reflect the views of the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user. The Cult-RInG project partnership assumes no responsibility for any consequences arising from use of the information described within this document. December 2018 Action Plan 2 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs Interreg Europe Programme Interreg Europe Programme of interregional cooperation helps regional and local governments across Europe to develop and deliver better policy.
  • Ministero Della Salute Direzione Generale Per L'igiene E La Sicurezza Degli Alimenti E La Nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma

    Ministero Della Salute Direzione Generale Per L'igiene E La Sicurezza Degli Alimenti E La Nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma

    arsl_ge.alisa.REGISTRO UFFICIALE.I.0012225.25-06-2018 0026792-25/06/2018-DGISAN-MDS-P Trasmissione elettronica N. prot. DGISAN in Docsa/PEC Ministero della Salute Direzione generale per l'igiene e la sicurezza degli alimenti e la nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma ASSESSORATI ALLA SANITA’ REGIONI E PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI TRENTO SERVIZI VETERINARI LORO SEDI ASSESSORATO ALL’AGRICOLTURA PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO SEDE E p.c. ASSICA Pec: [email protected] UNICEB [email protected] [email protected] ASSOCARNI [email protected] FEDERCARNI [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI PARMA [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO SAN DANIELE [email protected] CARPEGNA PROSCIUTTI S.p.A. [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI MODENA [email protected] C.I.A. organizzazione @cia.it CNA [email protected] UNIONALIMENTARI [email protected] A.I.I.P.A. [email protected] CIM –CONSORZIO ITALIANO MACELLATORI Pec: [email protected] DGSAF Ufficio 1 SEDE OGETTO: Aggiornamenti sull’esportazioni di carne fresca suina, prodotti a base di carne suina e prodotti finiti contenti suino dall’ Italia verso la Federazione russa. Si fa seguito alle lettere di questo ufficio n° prot. 15196 del 12 aprile 2018 e N° prot. 10609 del 19 marzo 2018 concernenti l’oggetto per fornire ulteriori aggiornamenti giunti dalla Parte russa con le ultime linee guida Versione del 14/6/2018 e pervenuti per il tramite della Commissione europea, al fine di consentire una esatta compilazione della certificazione veterinaria che deve accompagnare le carni ed i prodotti del settore suino che sono esportati dall’Italia verso la Federazione Russa.
  • Arheologu Un Etnogrāfu Pētījumi Latvijā

    Arheologu Un Etnogrāfu Pētījumi Latvijā

    SEKCIJA “ARHEOLOGU UN ETNOGRĀFU PĒTĪJUMI LATVIJĀ 2018. –2020. GADĀ” Tēžu krājums SESSION “RESEARCH BY ARCHEOLOGISTS AND ETHNOGRAPHERS IN LATVIA IN 2018–2020” Abstracts 2021. gada 11. marts Sekcija “Arheologu un etnogrāfu pētījumi Latvijā 2018.–2020.gadā.” 2021.gada 11. marts. Tēžu krājums Session Research by archaeologists and ethnographers in Latvia in 2018–2020 Abstracts Sekcijas rīcības komiteja / Session Organizing Committee: Kristīne Beķere, Ilze Boldāne-Zeļenkova, Antonija Vilcāne, Guntis Gerhards Krājuma sastādītāja / Volume compiled by: Antonija Vilcāne Angļu valodas redaktors / English language editor: Valdis Bērziņš Tehniskā redaktore / Technical editor: Elita Egle © Tēžu autori, 2021 © Latvijas Universitāte, 2021 1 SATURS Sekcijas programma / Programme…………………………………………………………….4 Priekšvārds / Preface ………...………………………………………………………..............7 Valdis Bērziņš Neolīta laika podniecība kopienas dzīvesveida kontekstā: trauku rotāšana ar aptītās auklas un cūkdelfīnu zobu iespiedumiem / Neolithic pottery in the context of community lifeways: decoration with cord stamp and porpoise tooth impressions ……………………………….8-9 Mārcis Kalniņš, Aija Macāne Burtnieku paleoezera krastu arheoloģiskā apzināšana 2020. gadā: izpētes rezultāti un perspektīvas / Archaeological survey of the shores of Burtnieks paleolake in 2020: Research results and future potential………………………………………………………………..10-11 Vanda Visocka, Mārcis Kalniņš, Artis Kons Resursu apzināšana arheoloģijas kontekstā: Māli Daugavas lejtecē, Kurzemē un Burtnieka ezera apkārtnē / Survey of the resources
  • Application Form Ogre, the European Capital of Culture 2027 Ogre European Capital of Culture Candidate 2O27 2 Ogre European Capital of Culture Candidate 2O27 3

    Application Form Ogre, the European Capital of Culture 2027 Ogre European Capital of Culture Candidate 2O27 2 Ogre European Capital of Culture Candidate 2O27 3

    SPARK THE CHANGE APPLICATION FORM OGRE, THE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE 2027 OGRE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE CANDIDATE 2O27 2 OGRE EUROPEAN CAPITAL OF CULTURE CANDIDATE 2O27 3 CONTENT INTRODUCTION 1CONTRIBUTION. 2CULTURAL. 3EUROPEAN. TO THE AND ARTISTIC DIMENSION Why does your city LONG-TERM CONTENT wish to take part STRATEGY 3.1. general outline in the competition 2.1. artistic vision and of the activities foreseen 1.1. strategy for the cultural in view of: Does your city plan to Cultural strategy programme of the year involve its surrounding 1.2. Ogre’s plans to 3.1.1. Promoting the area? strengthen the capacity 2.2. general overview cultural diversity of of the structure of your Europe Explain briefly the overall of the cultural and creative sectors cultural programme cultural profile of Ogre 3.1.2. Highlighting 1.3. 2.3. how the cultural the common aspects Explain the concept How is the European programme will combine of European cultures, of the programme Capital of Culture action included in this strategy? local cultural heritage heritage and history page 6 and traditional art forms 1.4. If Ogre is awarded with new, innovative and 3.1.3. Featuring European the title of European experimental cultural artists, cooperation with Capital of Culture, what expressions operators and cities do you think would be in different countries, the long-term impact 2.4. How has the city and transnational on the city involved, or how does partnerships it plan to involve, local 1.5. Outline briefly the artists and cultural 3.2. overall strategy plans for monitoring and organisations in to attract the interest evaluation.
  • Healthcare Obstacles to the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Health Systems

    Healthcare Obstacles to the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Health Systems

    Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions Case Study No. 15 Healthcare Obstacles to the efficiency and effectiveness of health systems (Estonia – Latvia) Written by I. Styczyńska, D. Po February 2017 EUROPEAN COMMISSION Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy Directorate D: European Territorial Co-operation, Macro-regions, Interreg and Programme Implementation I Unit D2: Interreg, Cross-Border Cooperation, Internal Borders Contacts: Ana-Paula LAISSY (head of unit), Alexander FERSTL (contract manager) E-mail: [email protected] European Commission B-1049 Brussels EUROPEAN COMMISSION Easing legal and administrative obstacles in EU border regions Case Study No. 15 Healthcare Obstacles to the efficiency and effectiveness of health systems (Estonia – Latvia) Annex to the Final Report for the European Commission Service Request Nr 2015CE160AT013 Competitive Multiple Framework Service Contracts for the provision of Studies related to the future development of Cohesion Policy and the ESI Funds (Lot 3) Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy 2017 EN Europe Direct is a service to help you find answers to your questions about the European Union. Freephone number (*): 00 800 6 7 8 9 10 11 (*) The information given is free, as are most calls (though some operators, phone boxes or hotels may charge you). LEGAL NOTICE This document has been prepared for the European Commission however it reflects the views only of the authors, and the Commission cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein. More information on the European Union is available on the Internet (http://www.europa.eu).
  • A Social Assessment of Poverty in Latvia

    A Social Assessment of Poverty in Latvia

    LISTENING TO THE POOR: A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA Report on research findings (March – June 1998) Institute of Philosophy and Sociology Riga, 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS TALKING TO THE POOR:............................................................................................................ I A SOCIAL ASSESSMENT OF POVERTY IN LATVIA .............................................................. I TABLE OF CONTENTS................................................................................................................ II ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS.......................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................... VII OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ................................................................................................ VII METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................. VII FINDINGS .......................................................................................................................... VIII CHAPTER 1: OBJECTIVES AND METHODS............................................................................1 AN ECONOMY IN TRANSITION................................................................................................1 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY ...................................................................................................2 METHODOLOGY
  • Database of Stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential Stakeholders for the Future Workshops

    Database of Stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential Stakeholders for the Future Workshops

    Annex 4: Database of stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential stakeholders for the future workshops Table A.4.1: Database of stakeholders for the Berlin Metropolitan Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Senatsverwaltung für Head of Unit Axel specialists (core city, Stadtentwicklung und Grünberg MA, ministry) Wohnen, Senatsverwaltung für Head of Department Kathrin Wirtschaft, Energie, Kanzler-Tullio Gemeinsame Head of Unit Ulrike Kessler Landesplanungsabteilung , Berlin und Brandenburg Wirtschaftsförderung Head of Unit Martina Berlin, Bezirk Tempelhof- Marijnissen Schöneberg BERLIN METROPOLITAN AREA METROPOLITAN BERLIN Regional/local Gemeinde Schönefeld, Mayor Dr. Udo municipalities Haase Gemeinde Grünheide Mayor Arne Christiani Business entities Kommunales Project Lead Matthias von Nachbarschaftsforum Popowski (KNF) Geschäftsstelle durch Büro Complan WISTA Geschäftsführung Head of Development Walter Leibl (Technologiepark Adlershof), Unternehmensnetzwerk Chairman Ulrich Misgeld Motzener Straße, Business Industrie- und Head of Unit Jochen organisations/ Handelskammer (IHK) Brückmann trade unions Berlin, Industrie- und Head of Unit Tim Handelskammer (IHK) Habernicht Potsdam (Kammerbezirk West-Brandenburg), n.n. Handwerkskammer Responsible for Urban Svend Berlin Planning Liebscher Research Deutsches Institut für Head of Unit Martin Gornig organisations/ Wirtschaftsforschung experts Source: MISTA team original illustration ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 1 Report Table A.4.2:
  • Annual Report 2018 Contents

    Annual Report 2018 Contents

    THE PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION'S ANNUAL REPORT 2018 CONTENTS 1. THE CHAIRMAN'S FOREWORD 2 2. TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 5 3. THE REGULATOR'S STRATEGIC PRIORITIES 8 4. PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORS IN THE ECONOMIC CONTEXT 10 5. NATURAL GAS 21 6. ELECTRICITY 35 7. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS 55 8. THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE IN THE ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS SECTOR 66 9. POST 70 10. THE UNIVERSAL SERVICE IN THE POSTAL SECTOR 76 11. THERMAL ENERGY 81 12. WATER MANAGEMENT 90 13. MUNICIPAL WASTE DISPOSAL 101 14. LEGAL REGULATION 109 15. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION 121 16. MANAGEMENT OF THE REGULATOR (STRUCTURE AND WORK ORGANISATION) 127 17. FINANCING AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES 132 1. THE CHAIRMAN'S FOREWORD 1. THE CHAIRMAN'S FOREWORD The year 2018 has been dynamic for the Regulator with significant changes in regulatory development. In early 2018, a new operational strategy for the years 2018-2021 was approved, defining key priorities for the service quality, availability and setting economically justified prices The most significant event in the energy sector was the agreement between the Finnish, Estonian and Latvian regulators on the creation of a single natural gas market, which is planned to be launched in 2020. This will mean that a single entry-exit tariff zone will be applied in the future, namely, only the tariffs on the external border of the unified zone will be applied for transporting natural gas through the systems of these countries but no transmission tariff will be applied at cross-border points between Latvia, Estonia and Finland. Last year, the Regulator also approved new natural gas distribution system service tariffs.
  • Environmental Noise Management in Latvia

    Environmental Noise Management in Latvia

    UNIVERSITY OF LATVIA FACULTY OF GEOGRAPHY AND EARTH SCIENCES Zanda Krūkle ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE MANAGEMENT IN LATVIA DOCTORAL THESIS Submitted for the scientific doctor's degree - doctor of science (Ph.D.) in earth sciences, physical geography, environmental sciences Scientific advisor: Assist. Prof., Dr. phys. Rūta Bendere Rīga, 2020 1 The doctoral thesis was carried out in the Department of Environmental Science, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences over the period from 2010 to 2020. Scientific advisor: Dr. phys., Assist. Prof. Rūta Bendere, University of Latvia Reviewers: Dr. geogr., Assoc. Prof. Iveta Šteinberga, University of Latvia Dr. sc. ing., Prof. Ritvars Sudārs, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Dr. techn., Prof. Linas Kliučininkas, Kaunas University of Technology Doctoral Committee: Dr. biol., Prof. Viesturs Melecis, University of Latvia, chairman of the Committee Dr. geogr., Prof. Oļģerts Nikodemus, University of Latvia Dr. habil. chem., Prof. Māris Kļaviņš, University of Latvia Dr. geogr., Assoc. Prof. Iveta Šteinberga, University of Latvia Dr. habil. paed., Prof. Raimonds Ernšteins, University of Latvia Dr. sc. ing., Prof. Gatis Bažbauers, Rīga Technical university Dr. geog., Assist. Prof. Oskars Purmalis, University of Latvia, secretary of the Committee The defence of the doctoral thesis will be held on the 12th of June, 2020 at 12:00 in a public session of the Doctoral Committee at the Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences of the University of Latvia, 1 Jelgavas iela, Rīga. The dissertation is available at the Scientific Library of the University of Latvia, 4 Kalpaka blvd. References should be addressed to Dr. biol. Viesturs Melecis, University of Latvia, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, 19 Raiņa blvd, LV-1586, Rīga.
  • Landscape Architecture and Art

    Landscape Architecture and Art

    LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND ART SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL OF LATVIA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES VOLUME 16 NUMBER 16 Scientific Journal of LatviaSCIENTIFIC University of LifeJOURNAL Sciences and Technologies Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 16, Number 16 OF LATVIA UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES AND TECHNOLOGIES LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AND ART VOLUME 16 NUMBER 16 JELGAVA,1 2020 Scientific Journal of Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies Landscape Architecture and Art, Volume 16, Number 16 EDITOR IN CHIEF Aija Ziemeļniece, Dr. arch., Professor, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia EDITORIAL BOARD Uģis Bratuškins, Dr. arch., Professor, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia Maria Ignatieva, Dr. phil., Professor, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden Karsten Jorgensen, Dr. scient., Professor, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Oslo, Norway Jānis Krastiņš, Dr. habil. arch., Professor, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia Juhan Maiste, Dr. art., Professor, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia Eglė Navickienė, Dr. arch., Assoc. Professor, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania Elke Mertens, Professor, Neubrandenburg University of Applied Sciences, Neubrandenburg, Germany Gintaras Stauskis, Ph.D. arch., Assoc. Professor, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Vilnius, Lithuania Ojārs Spārītis, President of the Latvian Academy of Sciences, Dr. habil. art., Professor, Art Academy of Latvia, Riga, Latvia Sandra Treija, Dr. arch., Professor, Riga Technical University, Riga, Latvia Daiga Skujāne, Dr. arch., Professor, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia Natalija Ņitavska, Dr. arch., Professor, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia Laura Lūse, Dr. art., Director of Rundale Palace Museum, Latvia SECRETARY AND LAYOUT DESIGNER Una Īle, Dr. arch., Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Jelgava, Latvia TECHNICAL TEXT EDITOR Ilze Stokmane, Dr.
  • Latvian - Estonian Common Military Heritage Tourism Product” EST-LAT 156

    Latvian - Estonian Common Military Heritage Tourism Product” EST-LAT 156

    Project „Latvian - Estonian Common Military Heritage Tourism Product” EST-LAT 156 On-line kick-off meeting minutes Participants: 1. Asnāte Ziemle Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 2. Kristīne Pētersone Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 3. Juris Smaļinskis Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 4. Lauma Strode Latvian Country Tourism Association "Lauku Celotajs" 5. Jana Kalve Kurzeme planning region 6. Aiga Petkēvica Kurzeme planning region 7. Inga Brieze Riga Planning Region 8. Iveta Eizengrauda Riga Planning Region 9. Raitis Sijāts Vidzeme Tourism Association 10. Jānis Sijāts Vidzeme Tourism Association 11. Alise Plaude Vidzeme Tourism Association 12. Dace Klāmane Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 13. Inese Okonova Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 14. Kaspars Medical Rehabilitation Centre Ligatne 15. Ieva Dreibante Amata Municipality 16. Liene Johansone Olaine History and art museum 17. Samanta Anna Priedīte Olaine History and art museum 18. Kaspars Špēlis Ikšķile municipality 19. Anna Īviņa Ikšķile municipality 20. Mārtiņš NGO "Mores muzejs" 21. Anta Brača NGO "Mores muzejs" 22. Alise Indriksone Engure municipality 23. Ināra Stalidzāne Carnikava municipality 24. Lana Radčenko Saldus Municipality 25. Solvita Ūdre Ventspils Museum 26. Ilva Zavicka Ventspils Museum 27. Raina Jeeberg Municipality of Lääne-Nigula 28. Anu Viltrop Estonian War Museum 29. Liili Kask Panga Areng MTÜ 30. Maili Roio National Heritage Board of Estonia 31. Anton Parn Foundation Haapsalu and Läänemaa Museums 32. Deana Poder Foundation Haapsalu and Läänemaa Museums 33. Kati Aus Visit Saaremaa 34. Merily Marienhagen Setomaa Municipality Government 35. Raili Mengel ERTO 36. Katrin Papp ERTO 37. Silja Lehtpuu ERTO 38. Margit Säre Peipsi Center for Transboundary Cooperation 39. Ain Tahiste NGO Hiiumaa Military History Society 40.