DOCSLIB.ORG

Database of Stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential Stakeholders for the Future Workshops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Database of Stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential Stakeholders for the Future Workshops Annex 4: Database of stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential stakeholders for the future workshops Table A.4.1: Database of stakeholders for the Berlin Metropolitan Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Senatsverwaltung für Head of Unit Axel specialists (core city, Stadtentwicklung und Grünberg MA, ministry) Wohnen, Senatsverwaltung für Head of Department Kathrin Wirtschaft, Energie, Kanzler-Tullio Gemeinsame Head of Unit Ulrike Kessler Landesplanungsabteilung , Berlin und Brandenburg Wirtschaftsförderung Head of Unit Martina Berlin, Bezirk Tempelhof- Marijnissen Schöneberg BERLIN METROPOLITAN AREA METROPOLITAN BERLIN Regional/local Gemeinde Schönefeld, Mayor Dr. Udo municipalities Haase Gemeinde Grünheide Mayor Arne Christiani Business entities Kommunales Project Lead Matthias von Nachbarschaftsforum Popowski (KNF) Geschäftsstelle durch Büro Complan WISTA Geschäftsführung Head of Development Walter Leibl (Technologiepark Adlershof), Unternehmensnetzwerk Chairman Ulrich Misgeld Motzener Straße, Business Industrie- und Head of Unit Jochen organisations/ Handelskammer (IHK) Brückmann trade unions Berlin, Industrie- und Head of Unit Tim Handelskammer (IHK) Habernicht Potsdam (Kammerbezirk West-Brandenburg), n.n. Handwerkskammer Responsible for Urban Svend Berlin Planning Liebscher Research Deutsches Institut für Head of Unit Martin Gornig organisations/ Wirtschaftsforschung experts Source: MISTA team original illustration ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 1 Report Table A.4.2: Database of stakeholders for the Oslo Metropolitan Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Department of urban Advisor for the mayor Peter Austin specialists (core city, development and regional MA, ministry) development Analyst Haakon All from City of Oslo Osvold Urban planner – Hans Martin Municipal master plan Aambø Urban planner – Stig Eide Grorud valley Urban planner – Frank Grorud valley Båtbukt Planner – regional Marie plan Aaberge Agency for real estate Chief engineer Lars Marius and urban renewal Hestnes Olsen Lars Frang Agency for City Assistant director - Helge Jensen Environment urban logistics Municipalities (core City of Oslo - Agency for Director for Urban Morten OSLO METROPOLITAN AREA METROPOLITAN OSLO city, metropolitan planning and building Planning Wasstøl area, regional services government) City of Oslo City – Bjerke Advisor Erik district council Aurbakken City of Oslo – Alna Advisor Halvor district council Voldstad Samarbeidsalliansen - Osloregionen (regional organisation) Vestby Municipality Planner Ragne Storsul Lillestrøm Municipality Planner or Director - for Urban Development or Business Development Nordre Follo Municipality Planner or Director - for Urban Development or Business Development Viken Count Advisor Jon Moxnes Steineke Viken County Director of planning Espen Nedland Hansen Lørenskog Municipality Head of Urban Arna Development Gudbrandsdo ttir Lørenskog Municipality Planner Henrik Backe Langum Business entities PostNord (Freight) - Freja Logistics/Schencker - Franzefoss/Norsk - gjenvinning (Waste ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 2 Report disposal /Renovation services) Næringsforening Oslo - Nord Aspelin Ramm Director Maren Bjerkeng OBOS Ulven/ Managing director Camilla Krogh Construction City Oslo håndverks- og Eivind industriforening Andersen (Organization for handicraft and building services/ electritians, plumbers etc.) NORDOX (Copperoxide - factory at Bryn) Business Department for Business Advisor Morten Fraas organisations/ Development and Public trade unions Ownership Oslo Business Region - NHO Political advisor Benedicte (Businessorganisation) Røer LO (workers union) Leader of LO Oslo Ingunn Gjerstad Research NMBU (University) Researcher Elin Børrud organisations/ Oslo Met (University) Researcher Gro S. experts Hansen TØI (Transport economic Researcher Aud Tennøy institute) TØI Project manager Karin NORSULP Fossheim/Ola v Eidhammer Citizens’ group Pådriv Stakeholder and David Reiss- managing director Andersen and Thomas Berman/ Stina Låstad Groruddalen miljøforum Managing director Reidunn Myster Beier Source: MISTA team original illustration. ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 3 Report Table A.4.3: Database of stakeholders for the Riga Metropolitan Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Riga Planning Region Head of Spatial Rūdolfs specialists (core city, Planning Unit Cimdiņš MA, ministry) Riga Planning Region Spatial Planning Sabīne Specialist Skudra Riga Planning Region Head of Project Inga Brieze Management Unit Ministry of Environmental Spatial Planning Kristīne Kedo Protection and Regional Department Development Riga City Council, City Acting director Ilze Purmale Development Department Riga City Council, City Head of the Board of Guntars Development Strategic Ruskuls Department Management Riga City Council, City Strategic Planning Justīne Development Expert Panteļējeva Department Riga City Council, City Head of Investment Rolands Development Division Bogdanovs RIGA METROPOLITAN AREA METROPOLITAN RIGA Department Riga City Council, City Investment Division, Jānis Prūsis Development Chief project manager Department Riga City Architect’s Director, Riga city Gvido Princis Office architect Riga City Architect’s Project manager Kristaps Office Kaugurs Regional/local Riga Planning Region Chair of the Daiga Mieriņa municipalities Development Council, Chair of Carnikava municipality council Riga Planning Region Head of the Edgars Administration Rantiņš Riga City Council Head of the Interim Edvīns Administration Balševics Jurmala City Head of Development Gundega Ose Department Ādaži municipality Chairman of Ādaži Māris municipality council, Sprindžuks Council member of Riga Planning Region Ādaži municipality Head of development Karīna and investment Miķelsone department Ķekava municipality Chair of Ķekava Viktorija municipality council, Baire Council member of Riga Planning Region Mārupe municipality Chair of Mārupe Mārtiņš municipality council, Bojārs Council member of Riga Planning Region Mārupe municipality Head of development Ilze Krēmere department ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 4 Report Salaspils municipality Chair of Salaspils Raimonds municipality council, Čudars Council member of Riga Planning Region Olaine municipality Advisor of Chairman Kristaps of Olaine municipality Kauliņš council Business entities Orkla Latvija Chief Operating Henrijs Officer, Member of Fogels the Board PharmIdea Member of the Board Vitālijs Skrīvelis Drukātava Member of the Board Valdis Jirgens Hansa Matrix Founder and CEO Ilmārs Osmanis Business The Latvian Chamber of Member of the Board Katrīna organisations/ Commerce and Industry Zariņa trade unions Research University of Latvia, Dean, Professor, Zaiga organisations/ Faculty of Geography Department of Krišjāne experts and Earth Sciences Human Geography University of Latvia, Associated Professor, Pēteris Faculty of Geography Head of Spatial Šķiņķis and Earth Sciences Planning Master Programme University of Latvia, Coordinator of Spatial Gunta Faculty of Geography Planning Master Lukstiņa and Earth Sciences Programme University of Latvia, Associated Professor, Māris Bērziņš Faculty of Geography Department of and Earth Sciences Human Geography Source: MISTA team original illustration. ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 5 Report Table A.4.4: Database of stakeholders for the Stuttgart Region Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Verband Region Stuttgart Director Planning Thomas specialists (core city, Kiwitt MA, ministry) WRS (Business CEO Walter Rogg Development Coorporation) City of Stuttgart Mayor Peter Pätzold Verband Region Stuttgart Head of the location Matthias Lutz management division Verband Region Stuttgart Investor Services Wolfgang Küstner Verband Region Stuttgart Head of Business Unit Holger Haas Location Development I WRS (Business Business Veit Haug Development development Coorporation) Head of the department of creative industries WRS (Business Head of the Christoph VERBAND REGION STUTTGART REGION VERBAND Development department of Gelzer Coorporation) creative industries Regional/local Sindelfingen municipality City Councillor for Corinna municipalities Building and Clemens Construction Schwieberdingen Mayor Nico municipality Lauxmann City of Esslingen First Mayor Wilfried Wallbrecht Business entities LBBW Wirtschaft / Gerd Gollmer Projektentwicklung Daimlar Director of Alice Kirr Institutional Relations Business Johannes Schmalzl CEO Johannes organisations/ Schmalzl trade unions “Verband der Spedition CEO Andrea und Logistik” (VSL) Marongiu IG Metall (Trade union) District manager of IG Roman Metall Baden- Zitelsberger Württemberg IG Metall (Trade union) Sectoral and Christa Lang structural policy, occupational health and safety Political Secretary IHK- Managing Director of Johannes Dachorganisation/allgem the Chamber of Schmalzl ein (Region Stuttgart) Industry and Commerce (IHK) Stuttgart Region Research University of Stuttgart Dr.-Ing. Academic Britta organisations/ Councillor Hüttenhain experts FH Aachen University of Professor at the Stefan Applied Sciences Faculty of Werrer Architecture and ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 6 Report Director of the Laboratory
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Provision of Public Services for Overall Well-Being in the Municipality
    ISSN 1392-3110 (Print) ISSN 2351-6712 (Online) Socialiniai tyrimai / Social Research. 2015. Nr. 2 (38), 33–42 Provision of Public Services for Overall Well-being in the Municipality Inga Jēkabsone1, Biruta Sloka2 University of Latvia Raiņa bulvāris 19, LV-1586 Riga, Latvia E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] The article has been reviewed. Received on 14 September 2015, accepted on 9 November 2015 Abstract It is important for service providers to know The aim of the paper is to present analysis of their clients’ opinion about public services, their subjective well-being regarding municipality provided expectations and whether they have been met public services and its impact on overall well-being using and what needs to be done. therefore customer the approved methodology. satisfaction surveys should be carried out regularly The main findings are as follow: in order to and the quality of services evaluated since it is one provide public services that meet the needs of the public, municipalities should involve the community in the of the most significant indicators identifying the decision-making process. Research into subjective well- satisfaction level and subjective well-being. being carried out in Salaspils municipality showed that Regular assessment of public services is an well-being is directly affected by public services provided important issue especially at local level, taking into in the municipality. account that local government is the main public Keywords: subjective well-being, municipality, employer and provider of a wide range of services. citizen participation, public services. Local government is close to citizens and should more actively promote a participatory policy in its Introduction activity and strategy.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Stakeholder Group Meeting
    Regional Stakeholder Group Meeting Partner/Region: Date: Round: Participants: Main outputs: Riga Planning 03.03.2021. 5th SH Participants: Topics discussed during the meeting: Region (Latvia) meeting In total 21 participants attended an Update on CHERISH activities completed in 2020, online meeting in Zoom platform project activities in 2021; Introduction of CHERISH Action Plan Directions of List of participants: Support; 1. Sanita Paegle; Riga Planning Discussion on selection of actions for CHERISH Region, CHERISH Project Action Plan for Riga Planning Region. Coordinator The main task of the project is to develop an Action 2. Olga Rinkus; Manager of Plan identifying actions that would promote the Carnikava Local History Centre development of coastal fishing communities and the 3. Ilze Turka; Manager of FLAG and protection and promotion of the cultural heritage of Rural Action Group "Partnership fisheries. for Rural and the Sea" 4. Āris Ādlers; Society "The Land of Based on the transnational exchange of experience, Sea/Jūras Zeme", External Expert analysis of the current situation and dialogue with CHERISH project stakeholders, the Riga Planning Region intends to 5. Inta Baumane; Director, Jūrmalas include the following activities in its action plan: City Museum 6. Mārīte Zaļuma; Tourism Action 1: Support for the strengthening of Information of Centre Engure cooperation platforms in coastal fishing Municipality communities for the preservation and promotion of the cultural heritage of fisheries and the 7. Jolanta Kraukle; Engure Parish diversification of the tourism offer: development, Administration commercialization and marketing of new tourism 8. Kristaps Gramanis; Project products, local branding, etc .; Manager of National Fisheries Action 2: Support for capacity building of coastal Cooperation Network museums working to protect and promote the 9.
    [Show full text]
  • Action Plan for Vidzeme Region
    Cult ural Routes as Investments for Growth and Jobs Action Plan for Vidzeme Region December 2018 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs _________________________ © Cult-RInG Project Partnership and Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-RInG Project Communication and the respective partner: Vidzeme Tourism Association. Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-RInG Action Plan, Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia Cult-RInG project communication unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source on e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Vidzeme Tourism Association and in no way reflect the views of the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user. The Cult-RInG project partnership assumes no responsibility for any consequences arising from use of the information described within this document. December 2018 Action Plan 2 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs Interreg Europe Programme Interreg Europe Programme of interregional cooperation helps regional and local governments across Europe to develop and deliver better policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Template
    Economics and Business doi: 10.7250/eb.2014.017 2014 / 26 ______________________________________________________________________________________________ The Assessment of Well-being in Context of Regional Development Inga Jēkabsone1, Biruta Sloka2, 1, 2 University of Latvia Abstract – The aim of the paper is to present the methodology web which rise new challenges [9], [48], [28]. Undertaking and results of some empirical research of the assessment of well- activities towards visioning a community’s future well-being being at local level in context of regional development. To achieve and choosing indicators that can assess both the current and the aim, such qualitative and quantitative methods of research as comparing, grouping, graphical analysis and focus group future states of that well-being are excellent opportunities for a methods were be used. The main result and finding of the paper community to articulate its values and goals and to foster is the conclusion that in order to promote the regional community involvement, as well as to promote regional development of the territory, the assessment of well-being at the development. Those aspects request setting of new level of administrative territory is needed. Based on this determinants in municipalities [12]. assessment, the policy can be developed in order to promote the During 2010 ‒ 2012, in Salaspils municipality (Latvia) the regional development and social cohesion of the territory, as well as to have better communication between municipality and SPIRAL methodology for measurement of subjective well- inhabitants. being indicators using co-responsibility approach was approbated, which was the basis for the establishment of more Keywords – Citizens’ involvement, municipality, regional efficient dialogue with citizens [24].
    [Show full text]
  • Title of Project
    USEAct Urban Sustainable Environmental Actions Fifth Meeting I Implementation Phase Riga Planning Region | Latvia 25th I 26th September 2014 INTERVENTIONS ON “REUSE” OF URBAN REFITTING AND REGENERATING INHABITED BUILDINGS AND AREAS Lead Partner Host Partner USEAct Riga Planning Region Fifth meeting Report Urban Sustainable Environmental Actions 2 Lead Partner City of Naples Urban Planning Department URBACT Projects_and Networks on Integrated Urban Development Policies - Central Direction Urban Planning and Management - UNESCO Site Gaetano Mollura USEAct Project coordinator Anna Arena Finance officer Maria Luna Nobile Communication officer Vincenzo Fusco LSG coordinator Contacts: phone +39 081 7958932 - 34 - 17 email [email protected] [email protected] Lead Expert Vittorio Alberto Torbianelli USEAct Project Lead Expert Contacts: email [email protected] Thematic Expert Pauline Geoghegan USEAct Project Thematic Expert Contacts: email [email protected] www.urbact.eu www.urbact.eu/useact The report written by the thematic expert Pauline Geoghegan NB. this report refers to the seminar work, with Should be read in contributions of Gaetano Mollura conjunction with the Lead partner, Vittorio Torbianelli Power Points Lead expert and USEAct partners presented during the meeting, that attended the meeting. Anna which you can Arena, Maria Luna Nobile and download here Vincenzo Fusco, Lead partner team contributed to the editing of this report. Cover picture: View of Riga city © Riga Planning Region All the photos are taken by the USEAct Team. And images are taken from the ppt presented during the seminar. Contents 1. Introduction and Concept paper 4 3 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Concept paper 1.3 The USEAct Issues of the Fifth Thematic Seminar 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE of RIGA Inga Jekabsone 1, Dr.Admin.Cand .; Biruta Sloka 2, Dr.Oec., Professor; Ansis Grantins 3, Phd Student Abstract
    Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference “ECONOMIC SCIENCE FOR RURAL DEVELOPMENT” No 45 Jelgava, LLU ESAF, 27-28 April 2017, pp. 102-109 DEVELOPMENT OF THE MANAGEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE ACCOMPANYING ADMINISTARTIVE TERRITORIES: CASE OF RIGA Inga Jekabsone 1, Dr.admin.cand .; Biruta Sloka 2, Dr.oec., professor; Ansis Grantins 3, PhD student Abstract. An accompanying administrative territory or satellite town is a concept in urban planning that refers essentially to smaller metropolitan areas that are located somewhat near to but are mostly independent of larger metropolitan areas. Taking into account the rapid social economic development of satellite towns, which leads to the population growth in these municipalities, it is important to ensure the well-being for their citizens. The studies have proved that society well-being is directly related to the involvement of citizens in decision-making processes. In this context, it is important to ensure the management of the municipality where citizens are playing important role. Especially, it is important in satellite towns where society participation level and local patriotism is relatively low. However, the theoretical management issues of satellite towns are not analysed properly in scientific literature. Mostly researchers focus on spatial planning of these territories. The aim of the paper is to propose possible management guidance for accompanying administrative territories of Riga based on case study approach. Within this research, the analysis of scientific publications and scientific research are carried out; qualitative and quantitative research methods, including grouping, graphic analysis, expert survey, semi- structured interviews, focus group method, and case study are applied. The main results and conclusions of the paper: based on the designed methodology on identification of accompanying administrative territories, 25 accompanying administrative territories around Riga were determined.
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting Master Plan for Riga Region 2021–2027
    COMMUTING MASTER PLAN FOR RIGA REGION 2021–2027 Riga 2021 The CMP has been prepared within the framework of the INTERREG project “Sustainable Urban Mobility and Commuting in Baltic ” (SUMBA) (Contract No. R074). Table Of Contents Terms and abbreviations used ............................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The functional area the CMP covers ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Institutions involved in the development of CMP ............................................................................................... 9 2.1. National and public authorities ...............................................................................................................................9 2.2. Public transport service providers ..........................................................................................................................11 3. Current situation and mobility trends in the CMP area .................................................................................... 12 3.1. Strategies, policies, action plans, visions in the project area ...............................................................................12 3.2. Current situation in the field of mobility ................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Saeima Ir Pieņēmusi Un Valsts
    The Saeima1 has adopted and the President has proclaimed the following Law: Law On Administrative Territories and Populated Areas Chapter I General Provisions Section 1. Administrative Territory An administrative territory is a territorial divisional unit of Latvia, in which the local government performs administration within the competence thereof. Section 2. Populated Area A populated area is a territory inhabited by people, the material pre-conditions have been established for residence therein and to which the relevant status of populated area has been granted according to the procedures specified by regulatory enactments. Section 3. Scope of Application of this Law (1) The Law prescribes the conditions for the creation, registration, modification of boundaries and establishing of the administrative centre of administrative territories and the territorial divisional units of a municipality, and the definition of the status of a populated area, the procedures for registration thereof and the competence of institutions in these matters. (2) The activities of State administrative institutions in administrative territories shall be regulated by other regulatory enactments. Chapter II Administrative Territories Section 4. Administrative Territories The Republic of Latvia shall be divided into the following administrative territories: 1) regions; 2) cities; and, 3) municipalities. Section 5. Region (1) The territorially amalgamated administrative territories of local governments shall be included in a region. (2) The municipalities and cities to be included in a region, as well as the administrative centre of the region shall be determined by the Saeima. 1 The Parliament of the Republic of Latvia Translation © 2010 Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) (3) When creating or eliminating a region, establishing the administrative centre of a region, and modifying the boundaries of a region, the interests of the inhabitants of the State and local government, the Cabinet opinion and the decisions of interested local governments shall be evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia Annual Report 2015
    Ombudsman of the Republic of Latvia Annual Report 2015 Riga, 2016 2 Contents Contents .................................................................................................................................... 2 Introductory Words of the Ombudsman .................................................................................... 6 I. Area of the Rights of Children ............................................................................................... 8 1. Division of the Rights of Children: Developments ........................................................... 8 1.1. Statistics ..................................................................................................................... 8 1.2. Recommendations of the Ombudsman ...................................................................... 9 1.3. Most Essential Opinions .......................................................................................... 11 1.4. International Cooperation in the Area of the Rights of Children ............................. 13 1.5. Research ................................................................................................................... 16 1.6. Educational Activities for Children and Subjects of Children's Rights ................... 19 2. Promoting the Rights of the Children to Grow Up in the Family ................................... 20 2.1. Issues Regarding Guardians and Foster Families .................................................... 20 2.2. Problems of Service Procurement and Settlement of
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2017
    Annual Report 2017 The Public Utilities Commission of Latvia CONTENTS 1. TERMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ............................................................................. 3 2. THE CHAIRMAN’S FOREWORD ............................................................................ 5 3. PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORS IN ECONOMIC CONTEXT ........................................... 9 4. PUBLIC SERVICE SECTORS IN SOCIAL CONTEXT ............................................... 14 5. NATURAL GAS .................................................................................................. 20 6. ELECTRICITY ................................................................................................... 30 7. ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS ...................................................................... 44 8. POST ............................................................................................................... 57 9. THERMAL ENERGY ........................................................................................... 64 10. WATER MANAGEMENT .................................................................................. 72 11. MUNICIPAL WASTE DISPOSAL ....................................................................... 81 12. INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION ................................................................... 87 13. MANAGEMENT OF THE REGULATOR ............................................................... 90 14. FINANCING AND ECONOMIC ACTIVITIES ....................................................... 93 2 1. TERMS
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated and Parent Company's Annual Report
    JOINT STOCK COMPANY OLAINFARM (UNIFIED REGISTRATION NUMBER 40003007246) CONSOLIDATED AND PARENT COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2018 (22nd financial year) PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, AS ADOPTED BY THE EU TOGETHER WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE REPORT AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT Olaine, 2019 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 CONTENTS General Information 3 Major Shareholders 15 Management Report 16 Statement of Responsibility of the Management 25 Financial Statements 26 Statement of Comprehensive Income 26 Statement of Financial Position 27 Statement of Cash Flows 29 Statement of Changes in Equity 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 31 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 83 Our Company 84 Chairman’s Statement 87 Key Performance Indicators 88 Environmental Responsibility 91 Social Responsibility 98 Quality Management 102 Corporate Governance 103 Contacts 105 Independent Auditor’s Report 106 2 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 General Information Name of the Parent company OLAINFARM Legal status of the Parent company JOINT STOCK COMPANY Unified registration number, place and 40003007246 date of registration of the Parent Riga, 10 June 1991 (re-registered on 27 March 1997) company Registered office of the Parent company Rūpnīcu iela 5 Olaine, Latvia, LV-2114 Major shareholders of the Parent OÜ OLFIM (7.79%) company (as of 31.12.2018) Clearstream Banking S.A. (8.49%) Swedbank AS Estonia Clients account (14.67%) SIA Olmafarm (42.56%) Major subsidiaries of the Parent company SIA Latvijas aptieka (100% equity share) SIA Tonus Elast (100% equity share) SIA Silvanols (100% equity share) 3 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 The Board The Supervisory Council elects the Management Board of JSC Olainfarm for five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Riga Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 Kandava Municipality
    RIGA PLANNING REGION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2030 KANDAVA MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY RIGA REGION SALACGRĪVAS LIMBAŽI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI ENGURE MUNICIPALITY ĀDAŽI MUNICIPALITY ALOJA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA KRIMULDA MUNICIPALITY RĪGA CITY INČUKALNS MUNICIPALITY SIGULDA MUNICIPALITY TUKUMS MUNICIPALITY JŪRMALA CITY GARKALNE MUNICIPALITY SĒJA MUNICIPALITY ROPAŽI MUNICIPALITY BABĪTE MUNICIPALITY STOPIŅI MUNICIPALITY MĀLPILS MUNICIPALITY The booklet is nanced by the SALASPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Financial Mechanism programme 2009–2014 No. LV 07 “Capacity-building and Institutional Cooperation between Latvian and JAUNPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Public Institutions, Local and MĀRUPE MUNICIPALITY IKŠĶILE MUNICIPALITY OGRE MUNICIPALITY Regional Authorities” project No. 4.3–24/NFI/INP–002 “Increasing territorial development planning capacities of planning regions and local governments of Latvia and elaboration of development planning documents” LIELVĀRDE MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA BALDONE MUNICIPALITY BALDONE ĶEGUMS MUNICIPALITY OLAINE MUNICIPALITY Activity and Functions General Information of the Region about the Region The regional level of governance ensures a connection between the national and local level of governance through the function of coordination. In this way the region is capable of covering the issues, which exceed the borders of one local government, and in the same time it denes the demand for territorial solutions of national level. Governance Entrepreneurship
    [Show full text]