Title of Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Title of Project USEAct Urban Sustainable Environmental Actions Fifth Meeting I Implementation Phase Riga Planning Region | Latvia 25th I 26th September 2014 INTERVENTIONS ON “REUSE” OF URBAN REFITTING AND REGENERATING INHABITED BUILDINGS AND AREAS Lead Partner Host Partner USEAct Riga Planning Region Fifth meeting Report Urban Sustainable Environmental Actions 2 Lead Partner City of Naples Urban Planning Department URBACT Projects_and Networks on Integrated Urban Development Policies - Central Direction Urban Planning and Management - UNESCO Site Gaetano Mollura USEAct Project coordinator Anna Arena Finance officer Maria Luna Nobile Communication officer Vincenzo Fusco LSG coordinator Contacts: phone +39 081 7958932 - 34 - 17 email [email protected] [email protected] Lead Expert Vittorio Alberto Torbianelli USEAct Project Lead Expert Contacts: email [email protected] Thematic Expert Pauline Geoghegan USEAct Project Thematic Expert Contacts: email [email protected] www.urbact.eu www.urbact.eu/useact The report written by the thematic expert Pauline Geoghegan NB. this report refers to the seminar work, with Should be read in contributions of Gaetano Mollura conjunction with the Lead partner, Vittorio Torbianelli Power Points Lead expert and USEAct partners presented during the meeting, that attended the meeting. Anna which you can Arena, Maria Luna Nobile and download here Vincenzo Fusco, Lead partner team contributed to the editing of this report. Cover picture: View of Riga city © Riga Planning Region All the photos are taken by the USEAct Team. And images are taken from the ppt presented during the seminar. Contents 1. Introduction and Concept paper 4 3 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Concept paper 1.3 The USEAct Issues of the Fifth Thematic Seminar 2. Riga Planning Region - the host partner 6 2.1 Welcome of the host partner 2.2 Riga Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2014-2030 and Development Programme 2014-2020 2.3 Urban regeneration- challenges in Riga City 2.4 Riga Planning Region Local Action Plan 2.5 Andrejsala - background and development 2.6 Creative Incubator, Rihards Zariņš, Director of Creative Incubator 2.7 Empty spaces = Public Spaces? The Free Riga movement - a new cultural approach towards urbanity? 3. The USEAct theme: Refitting and regenerating inhabited buildings and areas 13 3.1 Introduction 3.2 USEAct Case studies 3.3 Case study 1: Studies and analysis on the definition of Urban Regeneration: Urban Social and economic indicators 3.4 Case study 2 Naples: the Si.Re.Na. Project 3.5 Case study 3 Viladecans: Urban remodelling of residential Ponent, polygon and renewal of the extension of the Montserratina 4. The life of the network 23 4.1 URBACTII next steps of the programme 4.2 USEAct Local Action Planning 4.2.1 Framework and Improvement of the Local Action Plan Implementation 4.2.2 The EU urban landscape 4.2.3 LAPs Review Cafè 4.3 USEAct future planning and administration 4.3.1 A proposal: New Heroes and USEACT cooperation 4.3.2 Administrative and financial issues and feedbacks on the Project Reprogramming 4.3.3 General issues of the Network Management - Next steps 4.4 USEAct Bilateral/Trilateral meetings 4.4.1 Second B/T meeting “Differentiating Interventions: Real Estate developments based on innovation and knowledge based activities” 4.4.2 Third B/T meeting: “Differentiating Interventions: Urban uses and textures” 4.4.3 The Fourth B/T meeting “Smart data and visualization tools” 4.4.4 Planning the fifth and sixth B/T meeting in Dublin 4.4.5 Capitalisation of the B/T meetings Appendix 1 programme of the meeting and meeting participants 41 4 FIFTH THEMATIC SEMINAR IMPLEMENTATION PHASE INTERVENTIONS ON “REUSE” OF URBAN REFITTING AND REGENERATING INHABITED BUILDINGS AND AREAS Fourth meeting participants 1.INTRODUCTION AND Dagnis Straubergs Chairman of Riga Planning Region CONCEPT PAPER Development Council Jānis Miezeris, Head of Administration of Riga Planning Region, Agnese Bīdermane USEAct Project Coordinator,Riga Planning 1.1 Introduction Region Rūdolfs Cimdiņš Riga Planning Region Guntars Ruskuls Head of Strategic Planning Division The fifth USEAct thematic meeting of City Development Department of Riga City took place in the city of Riga, at the Uldis Apinis, Spatial Planner of Building Board of Ogre heart of the Riga Planning Region, City Edgars Pārpucis Spatial Planner of Building Board of Ogre City ULSG member Dace Grīsle Acting Head of focusing on the theme of residential Development Department of Ogre City Iveta Zālīte buildings in the heart of our cities, Spatial Planner of Spatial Planning Department of often in poor conditions: how to create Ķekava ULSG member Zane Koroļa Urban Planner regeneration strategies and on of Tukums ULSG member Pēteris Šķiņķis University of involving residents in refitting Latvia Gunta Lukstiņa Expert Sandra Plēpe Expert Valters Māziņš “Riga Development Company” strategies through energy efficiency. Rihards Zariņš Director of Creative Incubator In addition to thematic presentations and relevant Jonas Buechel Director of Urban Institute | Gaetano case studies provided by the USEAct partners, the Mollura USEAct Coordinator | Vittorio Torbianelli meeting was enriched by contributions by guest Lead Expert | Pauline Geoghegan Thematic Expert | expert Germana di Falco, expert advisor on Germana Di Falco Ad hoc Expert | Ivan Tosics URBACT Structural funds and Local Action Plans, who Secretariat | Paul Pece, Baia Mare Metropolitan Area provided the network partners with valuable Association | John O’ Hara, Kehinde Olowatosin City guidance on approaching key issues of funding. Other participants to the meeting were Wouter of Dublin | Álvaro Cerezo Ibarrondo, City of Barakaldo | Goedheer, who presented ‘New Heroes’, and Ivan Jim Sims , Buckinghamshire Business First | Štefan Tosics, URBACT Thematic Pole Manager who gave Lancarič , USEAct coordinator, Kamila Gejdosova, an update on the present and future URBACT National URBACT Authority, Ministry of Transport City of programme as well as timely pointers to potential Nitra | Linda Iren K. Duffy, Local Coordinator, Østfold County | Michela Crevatin Trieste City Council | Enric Serra del Castillo, Sonia Dominguez City of Viladecans | Wouter Goedheer, New Heroes EU funding sources, and the participants and other strategies, mainly through promoting energy experts from Riga city and region who presented the efficiency or in overall “property management” issues facing the city and its surrounding areas. improvements. Literature is full of “case studies” On the former industrial site at Andrejsala, a port about successful (and unsuccessful) attempts to 5 area close to the city centre, participants visited a structurally modernize inhabited buildings. Several creative business incubator site where many new factors appear to be crucial, such as: small businesses receive support and fruitful -identifying the right “scale” of interventions, networking. There they were challenged by inputs avoiding both an excessively small scale – e.g. a on the Free Riga movement, a community based single building – or a too large one; NGO promoting new forms of communication within -developing the capacity to correctly identify the “a the city sphere. priori” economic/financial break-even point of the The Riga meeting was the last of the USEAct redevelopment process and the likely availability of thematic seminars: the next meeting, in public and private funds, given that renovation costs Buckinghamshire, UK, in January 2015, will focus for such kind of interventions, are very relevant (with on involving Managing Authorities, as well as a high risk of not being affordable if compared to other solutions); finalising the Local Action Plans in each partner -the capacity to couple the best fitting technology area. This will entail preparing exhibitions in each (in terms of “value for money”) with effective long- partner city as well as during the final conference in term financial and facility management frameworks; April, in Naples. In the meantime bi/tri-lateral -a strong engagement of inhabitants and citizens, meetings continue to take place, with the last ones also through securing clear financial returns. due to happen in Dublin. Outcomes from four bi/trilateral meetings that had taken place in All these above mentioned targets require Viladecans and Naples were shared in Riga. innovative approaches either from the technical, financial and facility management point of view (e.g. 1.2 Concept Paper through new “operators” and partnership models) or USEAct Lead Expert, Vittorio Alberto Torbianelli from the social and cultural perspective. During the UseAct meeting, opportunities and challenges but The USEAct thematic seminar in Riga also limits and difficulties related to interventions in "occupied" buildings were discussed, also through was dedicated to “occupied” cases studies from other cities. Special attention residential buildings, seen as a was given to engaging the inhabitant, which is a potential resource to be optimized and very sensitive aspect. With reference to all the adapted to the requirements of current above mentioned topics, partners were invited to demand, to reduce the need to build provide information and comments about each local context. new residential settlements with negative land-take consequences. 1.3 The USEAct issues of the Fifth Existing buildings placed in historic areas of the Thematic Seminar cities (or in more recently built urban areas - e.g. USEAct Lead Expert, Vittorio
Recommended publications
  • Action Plan for Vidzeme Region
    Cult ural Routes as Investments for Growth and Jobs Action Plan for Vidzeme Region December 2018 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs _________________________ © Cult-RInG Project Partnership and Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes without special permission from the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement of the source is made. No use of this publication may be made for resale or for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the Cult-RInG Project Communication and the respective partner: Vidzeme Tourism Association. Citation: Interreg Europe Project Cult-RInG Action Plan, Vidzeme Tourism Association, Latvia Cult-RInG project communication unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source on e-mail: [email protected] Disclaimer This document has been prepared with the financial support of Interreg Europe 2014-2020 interregional cooperation programme. The content of the document is the sole responsibility of Vidzeme Tourism Association and in no way reflect the views of the European Union institutions, nor the Managing Authority of the Programme. Any reliance or action taken based on the information, materials and techniques described within this document are the responsibility of the user. The Cult-RInG project partnership assumes no responsibility for any consequences arising from use of the information described within this document. December 2018 Action Plan 2 Cultural Routes as Investment for Growth and Jobs Interreg Europe Programme Interreg Europe Programme of interregional cooperation helps regional and local governments across Europe to develop and deliver better policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Database of Stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential Stakeholders for the Future Workshops
    Annex 4: Database of stakeholders 1.1.1 Potential stakeholders for the future workshops Table A.4.1: Database of stakeholders for the Berlin Metropolitan Area STAKEHOLDER ORGANIZATION POSITION NAME GROUP Urban planners/ Senatsverwaltung für Head of Unit Axel specialists (core city, Stadtentwicklung und Grünberg MA, ministry) Wohnen, Senatsverwaltung für Head of Department Kathrin Wirtschaft, Energie, Kanzler-Tullio Gemeinsame Head of Unit Ulrike Kessler Landesplanungsabteilung , Berlin und Brandenburg Wirtschaftsförderung Head of Unit Martina Berlin, Bezirk Tempelhof- Marijnissen Schöneberg BERLIN METROPOLITAN AREA METROPOLITAN BERLIN Regional/local Gemeinde Schönefeld, Mayor Dr. Udo municipalities Haase Gemeinde Grünheide Mayor Arne Christiani Business entities Kommunales Project Lead Matthias von Nachbarschaftsforum Popowski (KNF) Geschäftsstelle durch Büro Complan WISTA Geschäftsführung Head of Development Walter Leibl (Technologiepark Adlershof), Unternehmensnetzwerk Chairman Ulrich Misgeld Motzener Straße, Business Industrie- und Head of Unit Jochen organisations/ Handelskammer (IHK) Brückmann trade unions Berlin, Industrie- und Head of Unit Tim Handelskammer (IHK) Habernicht Potsdam (Kammerbezirk West-Brandenburg), n.n. Handwerkskammer Responsible for Urban Svend Berlin Planning Liebscher Research Deutsches Institut für Head of Unit Martin Gornig organisations/ Wirtschaftsforschung experts Source: MISTA team original illustration ESPON / MISTA - Metropolitan Industrial Spatial Strategy & Economic Sprawl / Interim 1 Report Table A.4.2:
    [Show full text]
  • Commuting Master Plan for Riga Region 2021–2027
    COMMUTING MASTER PLAN FOR RIGA REGION 2021–2027 Riga 2021 The CMP has been prepared within the framework of the INTERREG project “Sustainable Urban Mobility and Commuting in Baltic ” (SUMBA) (Contract No. R074). Table Of Contents Terms and abbreviations used ............................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. The functional area the CMP covers ................................................................................................................... 6 2. Institutions involved in the development of CMP ............................................................................................... 9 2.1. National and public authorities ...............................................................................................................................9 2.2. Public transport service providers ..........................................................................................................................11 3. Current situation and mobility trends in the CMP area .................................................................................... 12 3.1. Strategies, policies, action plans, visions in the project area ...............................................................................12 3.2. Current situation in the field of mobility ................................................................................................................14
    [Show full text]
  • Saeima Ir Pieņēmusi Un Valsts
    The Saeima1 has adopted and the President has proclaimed the following Law: Law On Administrative Territories and Populated Areas Chapter I General Provisions Section 1. Administrative Territory An administrative territory is a territorial divisional unit of Latvia, in which the local government performs administration within the competence thereof. Section 2. Populated Area A populated area is a territory inhabited by people, the material pre-conditions have been established for residence therein and to which the relevant status of populated area has been granted according to the procedures specified by regulatory enactments. Section 3. Scope of Application of this Law (1) The Law prescribes the conditions for the creation, registration, modification of boundaries and establishing of the administrative centre of administrative territories and the territorial divisional units of a municipality, and the definition of the status of a populated area, the procedures for registration thereof and the competence of institutions in these matters. (2) The activities of State administrative institutions in administrative territories shall be regulated by other regulatory enactments. Chapter II Administrative Territories Section 4. Administrative Territories The Republic of Latvia shall be divided into the following administrative territories: 1) regions; 2) cities; and, 3) municipalities. Section 5. Region (1) The territorially amalgamated administrative territories of local governments shall be included in a region. (2) The municipalities and cities to be included in a region, as well as the administrative centre of the region shall be determined by the Saeima. 1 The Parliament of the Republic of Latvia Translation © 2010 Valsts valodas centrs (State Language Centre) (3) When creating or eliminating a region, establishing the administrative centre of a region, and modifying the boundaries of a region, the interests of the inhabitants of the State and local government, the Cabinet opinion and the decisions of interested local governments shall be evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Consolidated and Parent Company's Annual Report
    JOINT STOCK COMPANY OLAINFARM (UNIFIED REGISTRATION NUMBER 40003007246) CONSOLIDATED AND PARENT COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2018 (22nd financial year) PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS, AS ADOPTED BY THE EU TOGETHER WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE REPORT AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT Olaine, 2019 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 CONTENTS General Information 3 Major Shareholders 15 Management Report 16 Statement of Responsibility of the Management 25 Financial Statements 26 Statement of Comprehensive Income 26 Statement of Financial Position 27 Statement of Cash Flows 29 Statement of Changes in Equity 30 Notes to the Financial Statements 31 Environmental, Social and Governance Report 83 Our Company 84 Chairman’s Statement 87 Key Performance Indicators 88 Environmental Responsibility 91 Social Responsibility 98 Quality Management 102 Corporate Governance 103 Contacts 105 Independent Auditor’s Report 106 2 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 General Information Name of the Parent company OLAINFARM Legal status of the Parent company JOINT STOCK COMPANY Unified registration number, place and 40003007246 date of registration of the Parent Riga, 10 June 1991 (re-registered on 27 March 1997) company Registered office of the Parent company Rūpnīcu iela 5 Olaine, Latvia, LV-2114 Major shareholders of the Parent OÜ OLFIM (7.79%) company (as of 31.12.2018) Clearstream Banking S.A. (8.49%) Swedbank AS Estonia Clients account (14.67%) SIA Olmafarm (42.56%) Major subsidiaries of the Parent company SIA Latvijas aptieka (100% equity share) SIA Tonus Elast (100% equity share) SIA Silvanols (100% equity share) 3 Olainfarm JSC Consolidated and Parent Company’s Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2018 The Board The Supervisory Council elects the Management Board of JSC Olainfarm for five years.
    [Show full text]
  • Riga Planning Region Sustainable Development Strategy 2030 Kandava Municipality
    RIGA PLANNING REGION SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY 2030 KANDAVA MUNICIPALITY MUNICIPALITY RIGA REGION SALACGRĪVAS LIMBAŽI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI MUNICIPALITY SAULKRASTI ENGURE MUNICIPALITY ĀDAŽI MUNICIPALITY ALOJA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA MUNICIPALITY CARNIKAVA KRIMULDA MUNICIPALITY RĪGA CITY INČUKALNS MUNICIPALITY SIGULDA MUNICIPALITY TUKUMS MUNICIPALITY JŪRMALA CITY GARKALNE MUNICIPALITY SĒJA MUNICIPALITY ROPAŽI MUNICIPALITY BABĪTE MUNICIPALITY STOPIŅI MUNICIPALITY MĀLPILS MUNICIPALITY The booklet is nanced by the SALASPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Financial Mechanism programme 2009–2014 No. LV 07 “Capacity-building and Institutional Cooperation between Latvian and JAUNPILS MUNICIPALITY Norwegian Public Institutions, Local and MĀRUPE MUNICIPALITY IKŠĶILE MUNICIPALITY OGRE MUNICIPALITY Regional Authorities” project No. 4.3–24/NFI/INP–002 “Increasing territorial development planning capacities of planning regions and local governments of Latvia and elaboration of development planning documents” LIELVĀRDE MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA MUNICIPALITY ĶEKAVA BALDONE MUNICIPALITY BALDONE ĶEGUMS MUNICIPALITY OLAINE MUNICIPALITY Activity and Functions General Information of the Region about the Region The regional level of governance ensures a connection between the national and local level of governance through the function of coordination. In this way the region is capable of covering the issues, which exceed the borders of one local government, and in the same time it denes the demand for territorial solutions of national level. Governance Entrepreneurship
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Purposes of Use of Real Property in Municipalities of Latvia
    RURAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING ANALYSIS OF PURPOSES OF USE OF REAL PROPERTY IN MUNICIPALITIES OF LATVIA Irena Kukule, Vivita Baumane Latvia University of Agriculture [email protected]; [email protected] Abstract One of the cornerstones of sustainable use of land resources is the use of land resources for the identified needs. In every country it is needed to list the land according to the type of land use. Such function of land classification in Latvia is maintained by the classification of purpose of real property use. In a certain period of time needs of the specific purposes for which the land resources are used are changing, so the aim of this study is to research changes of areas of purpose of real property use in municipalities of Latvia. The analysis of purpose of use of real property in Latvia municipalities demonstrates the trend of decrease of agricultural land resource areas in proportion to the increase of forest land resource areas, excluding the region around Riga, where areas of agricultural land and forest land resources are decreasing, but residential land resource area for needs of development of capital is increasing. Key words: Land use, real property, purpose of real property use, municipality. Introduction The main resources of nature in municipalities are Land is a basis of a development of every sector a land and a forest growing on it. Besides, the land of national economy. The requirements regarding is not eternal, we received it from our ancestors and the land are different for various sectors of national eventually we will pass it over to our children and economy.
    [Show full text]
  • 05.12.2017 Ref. ФС-НВ-7/26504
    Annex 1 : 05.12.2017 Ref. ФС-НВ-7/26504 Annex to the veterinary certificate for pigs or pig products exported from the European Union to the Russian Federation/ Приложение к ветеринарному сертификату на зкспортируемую из Европейското союза в Российскую Федерацию свиноводческую продукцию Certificate No./ Сертификат №:………………….. List of administrative areas /Список административных областей: 1. Czech Republic / Чешская Республика Zlínský kraj/ Злинский край. 2. Republic of Estonia / Эстонская Республика Counties of: Harjumaa, Ida-Virumaa, Järvamaa, Jõgevamaa, Lääne-Virumaa, Pärnumaa, Põlvamaa, Ramplamaa, Tartumaa, Valgamaa, Viljandimaa, and Virumaa./ Уезды: Вырумаа, Вильяндимаа, Валгамаа, Харьюмаа, Рапламаа, Пылвамаа, Пярнумаа, Тартумаа, Ляэне-Внрумаа, Ида-Внру.маа, Йыгевамаа, Ярвамаа. 3. Republic of Latvia / Латвийская Республика Municipalities: Aglona Municipality, Aizkraukle Municipality, Aknīste Municipality, Aloja Municipality, Alūksne Municipality, Amata Municipality, Ape Municipality, Auce Municipality, Babīte Municipality, Baldone Municipality, Baltinava Municipality, Balvi Municipality, Bauska Municipality, Beverīna Municipality, Brocēni Municipality, Burtnieki Municipality, Cēsis Municipality, Cesvaine Municipality, Carnikava Municipality, Cibla Municipality, Dagda Municipality, Daugavpils Municipality, Dobele Municipality, Dundaga Municipality, Engure Municipality, Ērgļi Municipality, Garkalne Municipality, Gulbene Municipality, Iecava Municipality, Ilūkste Municipality, Ikšķile Municipality, Jaunpiebalga Municipality, Jaunjelgava
    [Show full text]
  • The Review of the Ngo Sector in Latvia 2013
    THE REVIEW OF THE NGO SECTOR IN LATVIA 2013 Civic Alliance – Latvia 1 Authors Inta Šimanska Jadviga Neilande Kitija Bite Rasma Pīpiķe Editor of Latvian edition Inga Skuja Design Elfa Raude The electronic version of the research is available on www.nvo.lv © Civic Alliance – Latvia In the event of republishing or citation, reference to the research The Review of the NGO Sector in Latvia. 2013 is mandatory. The research The Review of the NGO Sector in Latvia. 2013 is the activity of the project Improvement of Support and Monitoring System for Sustainable Development of Civic Society in Latvia. The project is implemented in cooperation with the EEA and the Society Integration Foundation. The project is financially supported by Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. Civil Alliance – Latvia is responsible for the content of the research The Review of the NGO Sector in Latvia. 2013. 2014 2 Contents Glossary ........................................................................................................................ 5 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 7 The Scope of the Research ........................................................................................... 9 1. General Characteristics of the Operation of Associations and Foundations. ............ 14 1.1. The objective of non-governmental organisations ............................................. 14 1.2. Quantitative changes in the NGO sector ..........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Quality Report on Electronic Communications Services
    APPROVED at the Public Utilities Commission’s Board meeting of 23 April 2020 (minutes No. 19, p. 9) 2019 Quality Report on Electronic Communications Services 45 Unijas Street Riga, LV-1039 Latvia T: +371 67097200 E: [email protected] www.sprk.gov.lv TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ 3 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS OF LAWS AND REGULATIONS ................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 I INTERNET SERVICE ....................................................................................................... 7 1.1. How Internet service measurements are performed .................................................... 7 1.2. Measurement results ................................................................................................. 8 1.2.1. Connection speed ............................................................................................. 8 1.2.2. Latency .......................................................................................................... 14 1.2.3. Jitter .............................................................................................................. 15 1.2.4. Packet loss ratio ............................................................................................. 16 1.3. Summary ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analytical Review of Implementation of Smart Specialization Strategy in the Riga Planning Region
    Review developed for Project No. R028 of Interreg Baltic Sea Region Programme 2014 – 2020 “EmpInno - Empowering for Innovation and Growth in Medium-Sized Cities and Regions”. Procurement ID No. T/RPR/2018/EmpInno-12 ANALYTICAL REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION OF SMART SPECIALIZATION STRATEGY IN THE RIGA PLANNING REGION LTD “FIDEA”, 2018 Contents INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 Socioeconomic Situation of the Riga Planning Region ...................................................... 5 1 KNOWLEDGE INTENSIVE BIOECONOMY .............................................................. 6 1.1 Smart specialization area participants in the Riga Planning Region .................... 6 1.2 Human resources ................................................................................................... 7 1.3 Main industry indicators ....................................................................................... 8 2 BIOMEDICINE, MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, BIO-PHARMACY AND BIOTECHNOLOGIES ....................................................................................................... 8 2.1 Smart specialization area participants in the Riga Planning Region .................... 9 2.2 Human resources ................................................................................................. 10 2.3 Main industry indicators ..................................................................................... 11 3 SMART MATERIALS, TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Stock Company Olainfarm Consolidated and the Group's Parent Company's Annual Report
    JOINT STOCK COMPANY OLAINFARM (UNIFIED REGISTRATION NUMBER 40003007246) CONSOLIDATED AND THE GROUP’S PARENT COMPANY’S ANNUAL REPORT FOR 2019 (23rd financial year) PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS AS ADOPTED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION NON-FINANCIAL REPORT AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT Olaine, 2020 JSC Olainfarm Consolidated and the Group’s parent company financial statements for 2019 TABLE OF CONTENT General 3 Major shareholders 12 Management Report 14 Statement of Management’s responsibility 26 Financial Statements 27 Statement of Comprehensive Income 27 Statement of Financial Position 28 Statement of Cash Flows 30 Statement of Changes in Equity 31 Notes to the financial statements 32 Environmental, social and governance report 84 Our company 85 Chairman’s letter 89 Business model and main key performance indicators in 2019 90 Environmental resposibility 94 Social responsibility 104 Quality management 113 Corporate governance 114 Contacts 117 Independent auditor’s report 118 2 JSC Olainfarm Consolidated and the Group’s parent company financial statements for 2019 General NAME OF THE GROUP’S PARENT OLAINFARM COMPANY LEGAL STATUS OF THE GROUP’S JOIT STOCK COMPANY (JSC) PARENT COMPANY UNIFIED REGISTRATION NUMBER, 40003007246 PLACE AND DATE OF THE GROUP’S R ga, 1991. gada 10. j nijs (atk rtoti - 1997. gada 27. marts) PARENT COMPANY ī ū ā R pn cu iela 5 REGISTERED OFFICE OF THE ū ī GROUP’S PARENT COMPANY Olaine, Latvija, LV-2114 SIA “Olmafarm” (42.56%) MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS OF THE AS “Swedbank” on behalf of
    [Show full text]