Abbeydale Grange Consultation (Ref JH), School Organisation Team, Floor 6, Derwent House, 150 Arundel Gate, Sheffield S1 2JY

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Abbeydale Grange Consultation (Ref JH), School Organisation Team, Floor 6, Derwent House, 150 Arundel Gate, Sheffield S1 2JY Sheffield City Council APPENDIX 1 Children & Young People’s Service Abbeydale Grange Consultation Consultation Period 14 September – 23 October 2009 Introduction This document contains information about Sheffield City Council’s proposal to close Abbeydale Grange Secondary School. The information is for consultation with: • Parents and carers, governors, staff and pupils of Abbeydale Grange and its feeder schools; • Members of the local community; • Other interested parties. The purpose of the consultation is for the Council to: • Explain the reasons for proposing to close Abbeydale Grange; • Set out the implications of closure for all stakeholders; • Consider whether there are alternative options; • Listen to the views and comments of those affected by the proposal; • Record responses and report back to Cabinet Members. Consultation will take place between 14 September and 23 October 2009. The consultation process will provide a range of opportunities for information sharing and feedback: • Meetings • Discussions groups • Surgeries • E-mail and postal address How to give your feedback Contact us directly If you want to let us know your views about Abbeydale Grange – what you think about the option of closure, whether there are specific issues we need to think about, or whether there is another option that you would prefer – you can contact us directly and we will make sure your views are passed to Councillors to help them make a decision. Here is how to contact us: E-mail: [email protected] Post: Abbeydale Grange Consultation (Ref JH), School Organisation Team, Floor 6, Derwent House, 150 Arundel Gate, Sheffield S1 2JY Attend a meeting Come along to a meeting and ask your questions or express a view. There are meetings at Abbeydale Grange and at the feeder primary schools throughout the consultation period. A full list of consultation meetings is given at the end of the document. 1 Why is closure being considered? The Council started on a review of Abbeydale Grange in December 2008. The reasons for carrying out a review were the Council’s concerns about the levels of pupil progress and attainment at Abbeydale Grange, and the unpopularity of the school amongst parents in the local area. These issues together raise a serious question about the future viability of Abbeydale Grange. What made the timing of the review more urgent was that the Council needs to decide whether spending £14m of government money to upgrade Abbeydale Grange’s buildings is good value for money. In addition, because Abbeydale Grange is not meeting the government’s new floor target for attainment (30% or more of pupils achieving A*-C at GCSE including English and Maths), there is a requirement for the Council to show that there is a robust and sustainable plan for Abbeydale Grange to improve its attainment. In the review, the Council also chose to discuss the approach to educating pupils that are newcomers to the city from other countries because Abbeydale Grange has a large number of newcomers on its pupil roll. The Council said that the outcomes of the review must be that: • young people attending Abbeydale Grange get better results and an improved experience of school; • parents living in the Abbeydale Grange catchment area have access to a catchment school in which they have confidence as a place to send their child; • children newly arrived in Sheffield from other countries get fair access to good education which meets their needs. These issues are set out in more detail below. Pupil Progress and Attainment The level of pupil progress and attainment at Abbeydale Grange has been a matter of concern for some time. Results at GCSE fell between 2006 and 2008 to a low level in comparison to Sheffield and national averages. During 2008 Abbeydale Grange was identified under the National Challenge as one of eight schools in Sheffield not meeting the Government’s new floor target of 30% or more pupils achieving 5 A*-C at GCSE including English and Maths. The Council’s own assessment was that Abbeydale Grange is at high risk of not meeting this target and moving sustainably above this target by the deadline of 2011. For schools in this position, the Government expects Councils to consider the possibility of structural change as a solution to the problem. A structural change might include closure, replacement with an academy, a trust, or a hard federation (a partnership with another school under a single governing body). During the review period, further evidence was provided by an Ofsted inspection which placed Abbeydale Grange in ‘Special Measures’. The inspection found that the progress of pupils was unsatisfactory, that leadership and management were inadequate and that the school did not have the tracking systems in place to judge attainment and progress outcomes. Although the school has recently been judged to be making satisfactory progress in addressing the concerns raised by Ofsted, there is a considerable way to go before Abbeydale Grange can demonstrate that concerns about the quality of teaching and learning have been addressed. Furthermore, the Council needs to be convinced that Abbeydale Grange can maintain its improvement in a sustainable way. 2 Low Parental Preference For many years Abbeydale Grange School has struggled to attract pupils from the local area. Currently, 9 out of 10 pupils in the catchment area (including Dobcroft) choose to attend other schools mainly in the South West. Other South West schools (King Ecgberts, High Storrs, Silverdale, Tapton and King Edward VII) have sufficient places to take all of the pupils that apply from their own catchment, as well as many from the Abbeydale Grange catchment, and still have room for some pupils from outside the area. According to the survey of parents of pupils in Y6 carried out in the review period, the reasons why parents don’t choose Abbeydale Grange include concerns about attainment and behaviour, but also a perception that other local schools, all of which have sixth forms and much higher levels of attainment, would provide better opportunities for their child. These trends in parental preference are long-standing. Due to the low intake from the catchment area, some of Abbeydale Grange’s available places have tended to fill mid-year with pupils that are newly arrived in the city or that have moved from other schools. This unstable pupil population is very challenging for Abbeydale Grange to manage well and is likely to have contributed to difficulties in raising attainment. The number of pupils needing secondary school places in Sheffield will fall steeply in the next six years. Abbeydale Grange’s number on roll is already very low by national standards. There is a high probability that with lower admissions at Year 7 and higher year groups leaving, that the school’s roll will continue to fall significantly from its current 550 towards 400 or even below. As the pupil roll falls, Abbeydale Grange will have fewer resources to be able to lead and manage the curriculum and will find it more challenging to provide a good quality of education. While secondary school intakes across the city will start to rise from 2014 (including in Abbeydale Grange’s catchment), growth in Abbeydale Grange’s numbers is unlikely to come from positive parental preference. Provision for Pupils that are Newcomers to the City Abbeydale Grange has a larger number of pupils that are new to the city from other countries than other schools. This is as a result of its available places and also because Abbeydale Grange has been very welcoming to these pupils and their families. Abbeydale Grange is praised for its care and commitment to newcomer pupils and for its culture of respect for diversity, but the Ofsted inspection highlighted that pupil progress needed to improve. The Council endorses the principles identified in the review that newly-arrived pupils should be educated in mainstream rather than segregated settings and that personalised support for pupils and families should be accessible within the local community. Summary The Council’s role is to ensure that every child in Sheffield has the opportunity to access a good quality of secondary education and fulfil their potential. Where there are serious concerns that this is not the case, the Council must step in and act. Not only must the Council ensure that immediate action is taken to improve the prospects for young people currently at Abbeydale Grange, but it must be satisfied that the school is on a footing to deliver a good quality of education into the future. That work must go alongside the need to make sure that more local parents see their local school as their first choice. Further, the Council must now make sure that it makes the right long term decisions when investing the money available for secondary schools through the Building Schools for the Future programme. These are the questions that Sheffield has to consider about Abbeydale Grange, and why it is considering whether closure is an appropriate option. 3 What alternative options have been considered? At the outset of the review, the Council set out what it believed to be the main options that might be considered for the future of Abbeydale Grange. It was important that the option that the Council would ultimately adopt should address the three main issues: improve attainment, raise the confidence of local parents, and provide at least as good or better education for pupils new to the city. During the review, the options were discussed by an Advisory Group which included representatives from Abbeydale Grange, its parents, governors, members of the local community and Council officers. A summary of the Council’s assessment of the options is given in the bullet points below.
Recommended publications
  • Better Learners Better Workers Autumn Newsletter Content
    AUTUMN NEWSLETTER LATEST NEWS FROM THE BETTER LEARNERS BETTER WORKERS PROGRAMME FOUNDED BY THE CUTLERS’ COMPANY WHAT ’S NEW? This year we are working with even more schools and NEW SKILLS FRAMEWORK employers, reaching even more young people across the Sheffield City Region. We now have programmes in 30 RESPONSIBILITY, CONFIDENCE, ADAPTABILITY, schools training 500 Ambassadors and reaching over 6000 PERSISTENCE/DETERMINATION, RESILIENCE, young people across Barnsley, Doncaster, Rotherham and COMMUNICATION, LITERACY, NUMERACY, Sheffield. DIGITAL SKILLS, CREATIVITY PLANNING/ ORGANISING, CRITICAL THINKING/ We are continuing to deliver employer-led learning across EVALUATING, PROBLEM SOLVING/DECISION six main sectors: Arts & Culture, Construction, Digital, MAKING, CO-ORDINATION/TEAMWORK, Emergency Services, Engineering and NHS/Healthcare. REVIEWING/LEARNING NEW MATERIALS Better Learners Better Workers Ambassadors are enjoying Ambassadors are documenting the development of their working towards a brand new skills framework this year skills in newly designed materials compiled in the form of a consisting of 15 skills and values that employers want, and new for 2017/18 Better Learners Better Workers folder. The will help young people succeed at school, in work and later folder consists of an Ambassadors handbook and a Skills in life. Booklet which Ambassadors will refer to and reflect on at all stages of their learning. If you have not yet seen or received your materials yet please get in touch with us! NEW SCHOOLS We are also proud to welcome nine new education partners to the programme this year: Chaucer School, Darton College, Don Valley Academy, Hall Cross Academy, King Edward VII School, Mexborough Academy, Penistone Grammar School, Sheffield Springs Academy and Winterhill School.
    [Show full text]
  • The PTI Schools Programme and Schools Leadership Programme : Member Schools
    The PTI Schools Programme and Schools Leadership Programme : Member Schools (excluding Greater London) Member schools in Greater London East Midlands Subjects in the Schools Member of the Schools School Programme Leadership Programme Ashfield School Modern Foreign Languages Brooke Weston Academy Modern Foreign Languages Brookvale High School Music Caistor Yarborough Academy Maths Yes Carre's Grammar School History Yes Manor High School MFL and Science Yes Monks' Dyke Tennyson College Yes Northampton School for Boys Geography and MFL Sir Robert Pattinson Academy Yes Spalding Grammar School Latin Yes University Academy Holbeach Geography Weavers Academy MFL Art, English, Geography, History, William Farr CE School Yes Maths, MFL, Music and Science Eastern England Subjects in the Schools Member of the Schools School Programme Leadership Programme City of Norwich School History Mathematics and Modern Foreign Coleridge Community College Languages English, History, Art, Music, Davenant Foundation School Science and Modern Foreign Yes Languages Downham Market Academy Yes Harlington Upper School History Hedingham School and Sixth Geography Form Luton Sixth Form College Latin Geography, History, Maths, Monk's Walk School Music, Science and Art Nene Park Academy English Mathematics and Modern Foreign Notre Dame High School Languages Ormiston Sudbury Academy Geography, History and Science Palmer's College English and Science Latin, Science, Mathematics and Parkside Community College Yes Modern Foreign Languages Passmores Academy MFL and Music Saffron
    [Show full text]
  • About Tapton School Academy Trust • Welcome from the Executive
    Please find the following information: • About Tapton School Academy Trust • Welcome from the Executive Headteacher • About the school • How to apply 1 Tapton School Academy Trust Our Vision is: To realise the Life Chances and Dreams of every child. Our Mission is to: Provide a safe place to be. Provide great teaching and learning. Create an environment where all opportunities are within reach. Tapton School Academy Trust (TSAT) was formed in April 2012 by Tapton School, an outstanding 11 to 18 school in the South West of Sheffield. The Trust was immediately asked to support and sponsor Chaucer School, an 11 to 16 school in the north of the city which converted to academy status from September 2012. Another ‘Outstanding’ Ofsted judgement for Tapton in 2013 gave the Trust the opportunity to grow and we currently stand at nine schools – four secondary and five primary: Tapton, Chaucer, Bradfield and Forge Valley are our secondaries and our primaries are Southey Green, Meynell, Hillsborough, Wisewood and Hallam. They are all linked in a shared endeavour – our mission is to provide an outstanding education to all our students 0 – 19. We are passionate that all our young people should see their time at school as safe, happy and fulfilling. Our approach is founded on deeply effective partnership working – inextricably joining our schools, students, parents and their communities. Our provision for students and parents All Tapton School Academy Trust Schools will offer: • A genuine inclusive approach which ensures the best possible attainment, progress and achievement for every student. • A broad and balanced, enriched curriculum which is delivered by consistently high quality teaching.
    [Show full text]
  • 20150622 Sheffield UTC
    Impact Assessment – UTC Sheffield (Human Sciences and Digital Technologies UTC) Secondary Schools: Number of Surplus at Distance Capacity Surplus point of Attainment Inspection Inspection School name Type from UTC (May Impact Rating Places entry 2014 Rating Date (miles) 2013) (May 2013) (Jan 2014) Fir Vale School Academy Requires 1.1 1050 121 62 36% 11-Jul-2013 High Academy Trust Converter Improvement Hinde House 3-16 Academy 1.5 1320 134 0 42% Good 8-Nov-2012 Moderate School Converter Sheffield Park Academy 1.7 1300 402 41 64% Good 5-Jun-2013 Moderate Academy Sponsor Led Brinsworth Academy Comprehensive 2.1 1487 144 13 64% Good 14-Jun-2012 Moderate Converter School Firth Park Academy 2.1 1350 298 38 40% No Ofsted grade No Ofsted grade Moderate Academy Sponsor Led All Saints' Academy Catholic High 2.2 1290 -96 -1 54% Good 7-Mar-2014 Minimal Converter School University No KS4 UTC Sheffield Technical 2.4 600 394 11 No Ofsted grade No Ofsted grade Too early to assess data College Parkwood Academy 2.6 900 151 34 51% Good 30-Jan-2014 Moderate Academy Sponsor Led Foundation School Winterhill School (Pipeline 2.7 1577 365 83 59% Good 30-Jan-2013 Moderate academy converter) Sheffield Springs Academy Requires 2.8 1300 347 43 36% 1-Oct-2014 High Academy Sponsor Led Improvement Community Handsworth School Grange (Pipeline 3.0 1025 17 4 58% Good 24-May-2012 Minimal Community academy Sports College converter) Outwood Academy 3.1 1200 245 47 54% No Ofsted grade No Ofsted grade Moderate Academy City Sponsor Led Academy Requires Chaucer School 3.2 900 92 28 29% 25-Jun-2014 High Sponsor Led Improvement King Edward VII Community Requires 3.2 1649 -96 -3 62% 19-Apr-2013 Minimal School School Improvement Yewlands Academy Technology 3.6 900 48 21 49% Inadequate 12-Mar-2014 Moderate Converter College Summary Within the local area of the proposed UTC, it is expected that only three schools may feel a high impact, eight may feel a moderate impact and three schools may feel a minimal impact.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Yorkshire and Humber Schools
    List of Yorkshire and Humber Schools This document outlines the academic and social criteria you need to meet depending on your current secondary school in order to be eligible to apply. For APP City/Employer Insights: If your school has ‘FSM’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling. If your school has ‘FSM or FG’ in the Social Criteria column, then you must have been eligible for Free School Meals at any point during your secondary schooling or be among the first generation in your family to attend university. For APP Reach: Applicants need to have achieved at least 5 9-5 (A*-C) GCSES and be eligible for free school meals OR first generation to university (regardless of school attended) Exceptions for the academic and social criteria can be made on a case-by-case basis for children in care or those with extenuating circumstances. Please refer to socialmobility.org.uk/criteria-programmes for more details. If your school is not on the list below, or you believe it has been wrongly categorised, or you have any other questions please contact the Social Mobility Foundation via telephone on 0207 183 1189 between 9am – 5:30pm Monday to Friday. School or College Name Local Authority Academic Criteria Social Criteria Abbey Grange Church of England Academy Leeds 5 7s or As at GCSE FSM Airedale Academy Wakefield 4 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG All Saints Catholic College Specialist in Humanities Kirklees 4 7s or As at GCSE FSM or FG All Saints' Catholic High
    [Show full text]
  • The Sheffield Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9S
    The Sheffield Science and Technology Challenge Day for Gifted and Talented Year 8 and Year 9s What are the Science & Technology Days for? How are they rated? They raise enthusiasm for STEM subjects and encour- Evaluations of last year’s events indicated that…. age young people to consider studying them further. 98% of the teachers and 87% of the young people con- In 2014, MCS Projects Ltd organised 40 Challenge Days sidered their Day to have been ‘good’ or ‘very good’. across the UK, involving more than 250 schools. 76% of the young people were more likely to consider What happens? studying STEM subjects at college or university as a result of the event. Twelve Gifted and Talented Year 8/9s are invited to participate from each school. Working together in mixed school teams of four, they undertake practical activities that increase their awareness of the applica- tion of science. Each activity is designed to develop skills that will be needed in the workplace, with marks being awarded for planning, team work and the finished product. Challenge Days are usually held on the campus of a local college or university. The young people undertake three 75min activities. The local Mayor or Deputy Lieu- The overall winning teams from each Challenge Day tenant is invited to present awards to members of each progress to one of our regional Finals In 2014, the Finals winning team. were hosted by the Universities of Cambridge, Man- chester and Sheffield. Director: P.W.Waterworth 12 Edward Terrace, Sun Lane, Alresford, Hampshire SO24 9LY Registered in England: No 4960377 • VAT Reg.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017-2018 Sheffield Priorities Development Programme
    2017-2018 Sheffield Priorities Development Programme A guide to support school engagement in the strategies that have been developed to address the Sheffield Priorities SYST EM CHOOL C S IM U P L CLUSION R IN O T U V E R R Learn E C E M R A E Improvement through partnerships D O E F I N N K Sheffield E R T S O Priorities S W EN T RICHMEN @SheffGovernance Improvement through partnerships September 2017 Sheffield Priorities Development Programme SYST EM 2017-2018 CHOOL C S IM U P L CLUSION R IN O T U V E R R Overview Learn E C E M R A E Improvement through partnerships D O E F I N N K Sheffield E R T S O Priorities The content of this development programme is S W organised under the six themes of the Sheffield E NR T Priorities, which form our shared vision for ICHMEN education in our city. Many of the strategies in this document relate to the May 2017 update of the Sheffield Priorities document, which can be found on the Learn Sheffield website. www.learnsheffield.co.uk/Strategies/SheffieldPriorities This document seeks to provide an overview of the various partnerships that are driving educational improvement in Sheffield, whilst also ensuring that all of our education community has access to the opportunities that they can engage with in 2017/18. The content of this programme, and the links to book places on many of these opportunities, can also be found on the Learn Sheffield website.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheffield & District DB Sports Under 18 League 2015/2016
    Sheffield & District DB Sports Under 18 League 2015/2016 The Basic Referees Course is open to anyone over the age of 14 who wants to referee either youth football or regular 11-a-side adult football. You will get all the help and support you need in order to begin climbing the referee's ladder, just like Sheffield & Hallamshire County FA and World Cup final referee Howard Webb.Our dedicated Referees Development team organise and run Basic Referees Courses throughout the region. Book your place today and take your first steps up the refereeing development ladder. For more information email [email protected] or telephone 0114 261 5500 Sheffield & District DB Sports U18 League OFFICIAL HANDBOOK SEASON 2015 - 2016 Meeting Venue Carlton Social Club 896 Gleadless Road Sheffield S12 2QF LEAGUE MEETINGS 2015 – 2016 Wednesday 12th August 2015 Wednesday 9th September 2015 Wednesday 11th November 2015 Wednesday 20th January 2016 (Progression from U16’s – U18’s meeting) Wednesday 10th February 2016 Wednesday 30th March 2016 A.G.M. Wednesday 8th June 2016 CONTENTS Page COMMITTEE MEMBERS 1 Names, addresses, telephone numbers and email addresses WHO DOES WHAT 2 What each committee member is responsible for IMPORTANT NOTES FOR ALL CLUBS 3 What each clubs responsibilities are 5 FINES FOR RULE AND PROCEDURE INFRINGEMENTS STRUCTURE OF THE LEAGUE 6 Clubs in divisions and page number directory FIXTURES 8 All clubs with their grid number and dates of matches CLUB DIRECTORY 11 All clubs in alphabetical order Useful Addresses and Contact Details 57
    [Show full text]
  • Outstanding 1 Achievement of Pupils Outstanding 1 Quality of Teaching Outstanding 1 Behaviour and Safety of Pupils Good 2 Leadership and Management Outstanding 1
    School report King Ecgbert School Totley Brook Road, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, S17 3QU Inspection dates 21–22 May 2013 Previous inspection: Not previously inspected Overall effectiveness This inspection: Outstanding 1 Achievement of pupils Outstanding 1 Quality of teaching Outstanding 1 Behaviour and safety of pupils Good 2 Leadership and management Outstanding 1 Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is an outstanding school. Overall, students make outstanding progress. Students’ positive attitudes are reflected in The proportion of students achieving five their good behaviour. Attendance is above GCSE grades at A* to C, including English and average because students value what the mathematics, is consistently well above school offers them. average. The headteacher’s relentless energy, high Achievement in mathematics is truly standards and focus on every student motivate exceptional and amongst the very best leaders at all levels. Together they have nationally. Students are extraordinarily brought about outstanding improvement by enthusiastic about learning number because continuously improving teaching and raising the quality of teaching is regularly standards. outstanding. Outstanding teaching in history, geography Teachers plan imaginative activities which and art makes an exceptional contribution to motivate students. There are examples of students’ spiritual, moral, social and cultural outstanding teaching in many subjects, development. including English, art and history. Governors provide senior leaders with Disabled students and those who have special outstanding support and challenge. Senior educational needs make outstanding progress leaders are held to account for all aspects of as a result of excellent, targeted the school’s performance. interventions. Students with autism spectrum The sixth form is outstanding.
    [Show full text]
  • Secondaryschoolspendinganaly
    www.tutor2u.net Analysis of Resources Spend by School Total Spending Per Pupil Learning Learning ICT Learning Resources (not ICT Learning Resources (not School Resources ICT) Total Resources ICT) Total Pupils (FTE) £000 £000 £000 £/pupil £/pupil £/pupil 000 Swanlea School 651 482 1,133 £599.2 £443.9 £1,043.1 1,086 Staunton Community Sports College 234 192 426 £478.3 £393.6 £871.9 489 The Skinners' Company's School for Girls 143 324 468 £465.0 £1,053.5 £1,518.6 308 The Charter School 482 462 944 £444.6 £425.6 £870.2 1,085 PEMBEC High School 135 341 476 £441.8 £1,117.6 £1,559.4 305 Cumberland School 578 611 1,189 £430.9 £455.1 £885.9 1,342 St John Bosco Arts College 434 230 664 £420.0 £222.2 £642.2 1,034 Deansfield Community School, Specialists In Media Arts 258 430 688 £395.9 £660.4 £1,056.4 651 South Shields Community School 285 253 538 £361.9 £321.7 £683.6 787 Babington Community Technology College 268 290 558 £350.2 £378.9 £729.1 765 Queensbridge School 225 225 450 £344.3 £343.9 £688.2 654 Pent Valley Technology College 452 285 737 £339.2 £214.1 £553.3 1,332 Kemnal Technology College 366 110 477 £330.4 £99.6 £430.0 1,109 The Maplesden Noakes School 337 173 510 £326.5 £167.8 £494.3 1,032 The Folkestone School for Girls 325 309 635 £310.9 £295.4 £606.3 1,047 Abbot Beyne School 260 134 394 £305.9 £157.6 £463.6 851 South Bromsgrove Community High School 403 245 649 £303.8 £184.9 £488.8 1,327 George Green's School 338 757 1,096 £299.7 £670.7 £970.4 1,129 King Edward VI Camp Hill School for Boys 211 309 520 £297.0 £435.7 £732.7 709 Joseph
    [Show full text]
  • She D Sh3 Web 7884-6925__E__
    KEY THE BOUNDARY COMMITTEE FOR ENGLAND DISTRICT BOUNDARY EXISTING DISTRICT WARD BOUNDARY (TO BE RETAINED) Tankersley EXISTING DISTRICT WARD BOUNDARY (NO LONGER TO BE UTILISED) PERIODIC ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SHEFFIELD PROPOSED DISTRICT WARD BOUNDARY PARISH WARD BOUNDARY Draft Recommendations for Ward Boundaries in the City of Sheffield February 2003 PARISH WARD COINCIDENT WITH OTHER BOUNDARIES Wortley PROPOSED WARD NAME STANNINGTON WARD Sheet 3 of 7 EXISTING WARD NAME (TO BE RETAINED) HILLSBOROUGH WARD Sheet 3 "This map is reproduced from the OS map by The Electoral Commission with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office, © Crown Copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown Copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. Licence Number: GD03114G" 1 2 3 4 7 Only Parishes whose Warding has been on D er 6 iv altered by these Recommendations have been coloured. R 5 PARK LANE Westwood Country Park B 6 088 STOCKSBRIDGE A L H Allot NORTH AS M Bla AN Gdns ckb C urn HE Br ST Do ook E The tle n R R Po it ive PARISH WARD RO rter r L r AD o Reservoir W Playing Field O O D R O Y D R OA D k o o r B k r Deepcar a M Cricket Ground D B CARR ROA la ck bu rn B r oo k School HIGH GREEN Sch PARISH WARD D A School O M Recreation R O D Sports Ground Ground Deepcar St John's R RR R A T C of E Junior School K C O C M O L C E F Y Royd F L E A J N THORNCLIFFE MORTOMLEY E Thorncliffe Park PARISH WARD Estate Mortomley Park Playing Field ROYD LANE STOCKSBRIDGE STOCKSBRIDGE CP E High Green AN T L EAST SO O Br UT SH oo H
    [Show full text]
  • Members' Questions Agenda Supplement for Council, 02/12
    Agenda Item 4 Council Questions Wednesday 2 December 2020 2.00 pm 1. Leader of the Council (Pages 3 - 8) Questions to Councillor Julie Dore 2. Cabinet Member for Children & Families (Pages 9 - 16) Questions to Councillor Jackie Drayton 3. Cabinet Member for Finance, Resources and (Pages 17 - 22) Governance Questions to Councillor Terry Fox 4. Cabinet Member for Business and Investment (Pages 23 - 24) Questions to Councillor Mazher Iqbal 5. Cabinet Member for Transport and Development (Pages 25 - 34) Questions to Councillor Bob Johnson 6. Cabinet Member for Environment, Streetscene and (Pages 35 - 44) Climate Change Questions to Councillor Mark Jones 7. Cabinet Member for Culture, Parks and Leisure (Pages 45 - 48) Questions to Councillor Mary Lea 8. Cabinet Member for Health and Social Care (Pages 49 - 52) Questions to Councillor George Lindars-Hammond 9. Cabinet Member for Education and Skills (Pages 53 - 56) Questions to Abtisam Mohamed 10. Cabinet Member for Neighbourhoods and Community (Pages 57 - 60) Safety Questions to Councillor Paul Wood Page 1 This page is intentionally left blank Page 2 C I T Y OF S H E F F I E L D M E T R O P O L I T A N D I S T R I C T Leader MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL – 2ND DECEMBER, 2020 COPIES OF QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS THERETO Leader of the Council (Councillor Julie Dore) Questions of Councillor Shaffaq Mohammed to the Leader of the Council (Councillor Julie Dore) Q.1 At full council in November I asked the following questions and was told I would receive a written response.
    [Show full text]