DOCSLIB.ORG

THE UNIVERSITY of HULL Do Committees Make A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE UNIVERSITY of HULL Do Committees Make A THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL Do Committees Make a Difference? An Examination of the Viscosity of Legislative Committees in the British House of Commons being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of Hull by Louise Thompson, BA (Hons), MA May 2013 Acknowledgements The submission of this thesis brings my time as a student in the Department of Politics and International Studies to an end. The ten years I have spent as a student here have been the very happiest and the most enjoyable. There was only ever one university at which I wanted to study, hence why I stayed so long. I have always found the department and its staff to be extremely warm, welcoming and supportive. I will always look back on these years in the department with much affection and will be incredibly sad to leave. Whilst I owe a debt of gratitude to all of the academic and administrative staff for making my time here so memorable; very special thanks must go to two people in particular. Firstly, to Professor the Lord Norton of Louth. From my very first day as an undergraduate student, through my undergraduate dissertation, a Master’s degree and now the submission of this thesis he has acted as my academic supervisor. I therefore thank him for a decade of advice and guidance. His supervision and counsel in preparing this thesis has been invaluable and has kept me on the right path whenever I have started to wander. Secondly to Dr Cristina Leston-Bandeira; my supervisor, mentor and friend, for her never ending supply of advice and words of wisdom. She has unhesitatingly offered a listening ear when I have needed it the most. Without her I would not have made the transition from undergraduate student to fledgling academic. I will never be able to put into words how grateful I am for the very many precious hours of her time that she has given me. As an incredible lecturer, supervisor and busy mum, she will always be the very model of the academic that I aspire to be. It is not possible to complete a PhD without the support of those closest to you. My utmost thanks must go to my husband John for sacrificing a job and career that he cherished to permit me to pursue my dreams of a doctorate. Without his constant love, support and encouragement this thesis would not have been written. Finally, thanks must go to our much loved son Percy. Not only did he provide many, many hours in the middle of the night during which to contemplate my research, he gave me the extra motivation I needed to submit this thesis on time. I apologise to him for not being there as often as I should have; for the late nights and very early mornings and the special moments that I was not there to see. I hope that one day I will make him very proud. I must additionally thank the Economic and Social Research Council for providing the studentship which made this research possible and my good friends Dr Dominic Welburn, Dr Sameera Khalfey and Dr Liqin Wang for all of their support and encouragement along the way. 2 Table of Contents List of Tables 6 Table of Figures 7 Abstract 8 1.Introduction 9 The Functions of Bill Committees 11 Research Aims 14 Analytical Framework 15 Hypotheses 24 Structure of the Thesis 26 2. Sample and Methodology 29 Quantitative Sample 29 Qualitative Sample 33 Outputs: Measuring the impact of bill committees 35 Input Machinery: The variables which may affect the viscosity of bill committees 42 3. Literature Review 52 The Decisional Impact of a Legislature 52 Placing a value on legislative output 54 Empirical Studies of Legislative Committees in the UK 56 The ‘Milder Influence’ of Legislative Committees 67 Committee Output as the Dependent Variable 68 4. Overview of Bill Committees 2000-2010 70 An Increased Workload for Bill Committees 70 Attendance at Committee Sittings 72 What Lies Behind these Changes? 74 Potential for Viscosity in Committees 79 5. Measuring the Viscosity of Bill Committees: Formal Committee Output 81 Proportion of Bills Receiving Amendments 81 Indicators of Legislative Viscosity 2000-2010 84 Formal Amendments and Legislative Viscosity: The Hunting Bill - A Less Compliant Committee 91 Explaining the Low Viscosity in Committee 93 Conclusion 98 3 6. Measuring the Viscosity of Bill Committees: Milder Influences 99 Defining the Less Visible Indicators of Viscosity 99 Ministerial Undertakings in Committee 101 The Importance of Report Stage for Legislative Viscosity 105 Case Study of Committee Viscosity: NHS Redress [HL] Bill 115 Why is Committee Viscosity so much more apparent at Report Stage? 118 Adaptation of Parliamentary Behaviour to Maximise Policy Impact 121 Conclusion 123 7. Specialisation and Legislative Viscosity 125 Measuring Specialisation 125 Specialisation in Bill Committees 126 Specialisation and Viscosity 135 Case Study of Specialisation and Viscosity: The Housing and Regeneration Bill Committee 150 Members with No Specialisation 153 Conclusion 154 8. The Impact of Evidence Taking 156 The Introduction of Evidence Taking 156 Evidence Taking in Practice 159 The Potential for Oral Evidence to Enhance Committee Viscosity 160 Assessing Bill Committee Viscosity: Some Anecdotal Evidence 163 Measuring Public Bill Committee Viscosity: Number of Amendments Tabled 167 Measuring Public Bill Committee Viscosity: Success of Formal Amendments 168 Measuring Public Bill Committee Viscosity: Milder Constraints 170 Explaining Greater Viscosity: Behavioural Changes in Evidence Taking Committees 174 Probing Amendments in Committee 178 Case Study of Viscosity in an Evidence Taking Committee: The Health and Social Care Bill (2007-08) 180 Conclusion 187 9. Conclusion 188 Findings Grounded in a Strongly Empirical Study 188 Contribution to the Field of Legislative Studies 189 The Viscosity of Bill Committees in the House of Commons 191 Maximising Committee Impact 194 Areas for further research 196 Conclusion 199 4 Bibliography 200 Appendices 210 Appendix 1: Indicators of Viscosity in Bill Committees 209 Appendix 2: Sample of Government Bills 210 Appendix 3: Example of Coding Frame for Committee Amendments 214 Appendix 4: Sample of Public Bill Committees 2007-2010 215 Appendix 5: Classification of Amendments 217 Appendix 6: Research Interviews Undertaken 219 Appendix 7: Time Spent in Bill Committees 2000-2010 220 Appendix 8: Attendance of Individual Members at Bill Committees 221 Appendix 9: Reasons for Absence from Bill Committees 222 Appendix 10: Bills Reported with Non Government Amendments 224 Appendix 11: Successful Meetings with Government Ministers before Report Stage 225 Appendix 12: Successful Government Amendments at Report Stage which have been discussed in committee but on which no undertaking was given 231 Appendix 13: Changes made during Report Stage of the NHS Redress [HL] Bill as a Result of Committee Scrutiny 232 Appendix 14: Evidence Submitted to the Health and Social Care Bill Committee 234 Appendix 15: Government Amendments to be made in the House of Lords 235 Appendix 16: Specialisation in the Local Government and Public Involvement in Health Bill Committee (2006-07 Session) 238 Appendix 17: Specialisation in Committees with Successful Amendments 239 Appendix 18: Specialisation and Successful Non Government Amendments (Upper and Lower Quartiles) 240 Appendix 19: Specialisation of Members Moving Successful Amendments in Committee 241 Appendix 20: Levels of Association between the Specialisation of Backbenchers and Ministerial Undertakings 243 Appendix 21: Recommendations for Evidence Taking Powers in Written Evidence Submitted to the Modernisation Committee (2006) 250 Appendix 22: Non Government Amendments Tabled in Bill Committees 251 5 List of Tables Table 1. The Milder Influence of Bill Committees ...................................................................................... 36 Table 2. Measurement of Specialisation.......................................................................................................... 46 Table 3. Amendments Moved or Discussed in Committee .................................................................... 72 Table 4. Bills Amended in Committee by Session ...................................................................................... 82 Table 5. Bills Receiving the Greatest Number of Amendments in Committee ............................ 83 Table 6. Bills Leaving Committee with No Amendments 2000-2010 .............................................. 83 Table 7. Successful Government Amendments by Session.................................................................... 84 Table 8. Unsuccessful Government Amendments ...................................................................................... 87 Table 9. Success of Non Government Amendments by Session .......................................................... 88 Table 10. Bills with the Highest Frequency of Successful Non Government Amendments.. 89 Table 11. Successful Government Amendments ......................................................................................... 89 Table 12. Substantiveness of Amendments Passed in Committee .................................................... 90 Table 13. Substantial Amendments Passed in the Hunting Bill Committee (2002-03).......... 93 Table 14. Ministerial Undertakings in Bill Committees 2000-2010 .............................................. 101 Table 15. Changes Made to Government Bills through Other Means ........................................... 102 Table 16. Indicators of Viscosity in NHS Redress [HL] Bill Committee ......................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Wednesday Volume 501 25 November 2009 No. 5 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 25 November 2009 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2009 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 513 25 NOVEMBER 2009 514 my hon. Friend the Member for North Ayrshire and House of Commons Arran (Ms Clark). In a letter I received from Ofcom, the regulator states: Wednesday 25 November 2009 “Ofcom does not have the power to mandate ISPs”— internet service providers. Surely that power is overdue, because otherwise, many of my constituents, along with The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock those of my colleagues, will continue to receive a poor broadband service. PRAYERS Mr. Murphy: My hon. Friend makes some very important points about the decision-making powers and architecture [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] that will ensure we achieve 90 per cent. broadband penetration. We are trying to ensure that the market provides most of that, and we expect that up to two thirds—60 to 70 per cent.—of homes will be able to Oral Answers to Questions access super-fast broadband through the market. However, the Government will have to do additional things, and my hon. Friend can make the case for giving Ofcom SCOTLAND additional powers; but, again, we are absolutely determined that no one be excluded for reasons of geography or income.
    [Show full text]
  • The Privatisation of Qinetiq
    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The privatisation of QinetiQ Twenty–fourth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 12 May 2008 HC 151 Published on 10 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) The following were also Members of the Committee during the period of the enquiry: Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North) and Mr John Healey MP (Labour, Wentworth). Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitution Unit Monitor 63 / June 2016
    1 Constitution Unit Monitor 63 / June 2016 In addition, important questions relate to the referendum The EU referendum: process itself. Democracy requires that referendums be conducted fairly, but the rules surrounding referendums in a fair process? the UK remain deeply contested. As reported in Monitor 61 (page 12) and 62 (page 11), the legislation enabling the The forthcoming referendum on whether the UK referendum passed through parliament last year amidst should remain a member of the European Union or leave much controversy and only after multiple government – to be held on 23 June – has raised many important concessions. Since David Cameron announced the date constitutional questions. of the vote on 20 February, five important aspects of referendum conduct have received particular attention. In part, these concern the implications that a vote for Brexit would have for the constitution and the First, in line with the Prime Minister’s announcement distribution of power in the UK and the EU. As reported in January, ministers have been allowed to campaign elsewhere in this edition of Monitor, these issues have against the government’s position of supporting a been addressed in a series of Constitution Unit seminars vote to remain in the EU. Five full members of cabinet and briefing papers in recent weeks (see page 14). The have done so (one of whom – Iain Duncan Smith – has briefing papers, as well as videos of the seminars, are subsequently resigned), as have a number of junior available online. The process of Brexit has also been ministers. This is only the third time that ministers examined in detail on the Constitution Unit blog by from the same party have been allowed to disagree so Alan Renwick.
    [Show full text]
  • Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
    Thursday Volume 506 25 February 2010 No. 45 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 25 February 2010 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2010 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through the Office of Public Sector Information website at www.opsi.gov.uk/click-use/ Enquiries to the Office of Public Sector Information, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 427 25 FEBRUARY 2010 428 Dr. Alan Whitehead (Southampton, Test) (Lab): Does House of Commons my hon. Friend accept that a large element of fuel poverty relates to the energy efficiency of the homes in Thursday 25 February 2010 which fuel-poor people live? Does he also accept that efforts to ensure that those homes are made properly energy efficient are a vital part of our attack on fuel The House met at half-past Ten o’clock poverty? What is his assessment of the likely impact of community energy response teams, community energy saving programmes, and other schemes, such as the PRAYERS Great British Refurb, on improving the energy efficiency of homes? [MR.SPEAKER in the Chair] Mr. Kidney: I agree that the most sustainable way of BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS helping people to stay out of fuel poverty is to ensure that their homes are energy efficient. That is why we have concentrated so much on the energy companies’ LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES BILL [LORDS] obligation, under which more than 6 million homes (BY ORDER) have been insulated. Another 2 million have been insulated Second Reading opposed and deferred until Thursday under Warm Front.
    [Show full text]
  • Do As I Say, Not As I Do
    Giving Thought discussion paper no. 5 Do as I say, not as I do: UK policy and the global closing space for civil society: a 2017 update December 2016 January 2017 1 About Giving Thought Giving Thought is the Charities Aid Foundation’s think tank. We consider the key challenges and opportunities facing civil society organisations and those who support them, as well as examining wider policy issues through the lens of philanthropy. Our work provides insight and stimulates debate. We aim to engage with and influence researchers, practitioners and policymakers from the not-for-profit sector, government, academia and the public and private sectors. About the Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) Charities Aid Foundation (CAF) is a leading international civil society organisation (CSO). Our mission is to motivate society to give ever more effectively and help transform lives and communities around the world. We work to stimulate philanthropy, social investment and the effective use of charitable funds by offering a range of specialist financial services to CSOs and donors, and through advocating for a favourable public policy environment. About this report This report is an updated version of a report of the same title published by CAF in April 2016 to coincide with an official visit from Maina Kiai, UN Special Rapporteur on the rights to peaceful assembly and of association (a follow-up visit to his 2013 review), who spoke about the closing space for civil society at Parliamentary event hosted by CAF. That report sought to raise awareness of the impact that UK policy - given position of leadership and long history of cultivating civil society - could have on the closing space for civil society globally.
    [Show full text]
  • DFID Annual Report 2008
    House of Commons International Development Committee DFID Annual Report 2008 Second Report of Session 2008–09 Volume II Oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 10 February 2009 HC 220-II [Incorporating HC 945-i, -ii and -iii of Session 2007-08 Published on 19 February 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 International Development Committee The International Development Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of the Department for International Development and its associated public bodies. Current membership Malcolm Bruce MP (Liberal Democrat, Gordon) (Chairman) John Battle MP (Labour, Leeds West) Hugh Bayley MP (Labour, City of York) John Bercow MP (Conservative, Buckingham) Richard Burden MP (Labour, Birmingham Northfield) Mr Stephen Crabb MP (Conservative, Preseli Pembrokeshire) Mr Mark Hendrick MP (Labour Co-op, Preston) Daniel Kawczynski MP (Conservative, Shrewsbury and Atcham) Jim Sheridan MP (Labour, Paisley and Renfrewshire North) Mr Marsha Singh MP (Labour, Bradford West) Andrew Stunell (Liberal Democrat, Hazel Grove) Ann McKechin (Labour, Glasgow North) and Sir Robert Smith (Liberal Democrat, West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine) were also members of the Committee during this inquiry. Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis Vol.1 .Pdf
    UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA LA EVASIÓN EN THE HOUSE OF COMMONS Y EL CONGRESO DE LOS DIPUTADOS: UN ESTUDIO INTERCULTURAL TESIS DOCTORAL DIRECTORA: DRA. ISABEL MARÍA ÍÑIGO MORA AUTOR: DERYCK JOHN BARKER FRASER Fdo. Dra. Isabel María Íñigo Mora Fdo. Deryck John Barker Fraser SEVILLA 2015 To my very dear son, Juan José. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my sincere and heartfelt gratitude, first and foremost, to the director of this doctoral thesis, my tutor and very close friend, Dr. Isabel María Íñigo Mora, who must receive all of the credit for proposing the title of this dissertation, and for suggesting the corpus upon which it is based. She generously spent a great deal of her precious time giving me assistance, advice and encouragement, without which this piece of work would not have been produced. In addition to devoting a great number of hours providing me with suggestions on how to plan this essay, she unselfishly took the trouble to read and correct the entire thesis, and even to advise me on how to rewrite several paragraphs. Her patience with me knew no bounds, despite my ignorance of administrative matters, absent-mindedness, and numerous foibles and mistakes. She lent, and more often than not, gave me a great amount of bibliographical material, including numerous articles and books, and even had the kindness to provide me with copies of any important material available on the internet. She was, in fact, a library on wheels. Most importantly, she has always kept me informed about developments in the English Language Department of the University of Seville.
    [Show full text]
  • New Peers Created Have Fallen from 244 Under David Cameron’S Six Years As Prime Minister to Only 37 to Date Under Theresa May
    \ For more information on DeHavilland and how we can help with political monitoring, custom research and consultancy, contact: +44 (0)20 3033 3870 [email protected] Information Services Ltd 2018 0 www.dehavilland.co.uk INTRODUCTION & ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................. 2 CONSERVATIVES ........................................................................................................................................ 4 Diana Barran MBE .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 The Rt. Hon. Sir Edward Garnier QC ........................................................................................................................... 5 The Rt. Hon. Sir Alan Haselhurst.................................................................................................................................. 7 The Rt. Hon. Peter Lilley ................................................................................................................................................ 8 Catherine Meyer CBE ................................................................................................................................................... 10 The Rt. Hon. Sir Eric Pickles ........................................................................................................................................ 11 The Rt. Hon. Sir John
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix to Memorandum of Law on Behalf of United
    APPENDIX TO MEMORANDUM OF LAW ON BEHALF OF UNITED KINGDOM AND EUROPEAN PARLIAMENTARIANS AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION LIST OF AMICI HOUSES OF PARLIAMENT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND AND MEMBERS OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT House of Lords The Lord Ahmed The Lord Alderdice The Lord Alton of Liverpool, CB The Rt Hon the Lord Archer of Sandwell, QC PC The Lord Avebury The Lord Berkeley, OBE The Lord Bhatia, OBE The Viscount Bledisloe, QC The Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury The Rt Hon the Baroness Boothroyd, OM PC The Lord Borrie, QC The Rt Hon the Baroness Bottomley of Nettlestone, DL PC The Lord Bowness, CBE DL The Lord Brennan, QC The Lord Bridges, GCMG The Rt Hon the Lord Brittan of Spennithorne, QC DL PC The Rt Hon the Lord Brooke of Sutton Mandeville, CH PC The Viscount Brookeborough, DL The Rt Hon the Lord Browne-Wilkinson, PC The Lord Campbell of Alloway, ERD QC The Lord Cameron of Dillington The Rt Hon the Lord Cameron of Lochbroom, QC The Rt Rev and Rt Hon the Lord Carey of Clifton, PC The Lord Carlile of Berriew, QC The Baroness Chapman The Lord Chidgey The Lord Clarke of Hampstead, CBE The Lord Clement-Jones, CBE The Rt Hon the Lord Clinton-Davis, PC The Lord Cobbold, DL The Lord Corbett of Castle Vale The Rt Hon the Baroness Corston, PC The Lord Dahrendorf, KBE The Lord Dholakia, OBE DL The Lord Donoughue The Baroness D’Souza, CMG The Lord Dykes The Viscount Falkland The Baroness Falkner of Margravine The Lord Faulkner of Worcester The Rt Hon the
    [Show full text]
  • Gill Morgan, Is Dealing with Whitehall Arrogance
    plus… Jeff Jones Labour’s leadership election Nicola Porter Journalism must fight back Barry Morgan Religion and politics Dafydd Wigley Options for the referendum Andrew Shearer Garlic’s secret weapon Gill David Culshaw Decline of the honeybee Gordon James Coal in a warm climate Morgan Katija Dew Beating the crunch Gear change for our civil service Andrew Davies The Kafka Brigade Peter Finch Capturing the soul www.iwa.org.uk Winter 2009 No. 39 | £5 clickonwales ! Coming soon, our new website www. iwa.or g.u k, containing much more up-to-date news and information and with a freshly designed new look. Featuring clickonwales – the IWA’s new online service providing news and analysis about current affairs as it affects our small country. Expert contributors from across the political spectrum will be commissioned daily to provide insights into the unfolding drama of the new 21 st Century Wales – whether it be Labour’s leadership election, constitutional change, the climate change debate, arguments about education, or the ongoing problems, successes and shortcomings of the Welsh economy. There will be more scope, too, for interactive debate, and a special section for IWA members. Plus: Information about the IWA’s branches, events, and publications. This will be the must see and must use Welsh website. clickonwales and see where it takes you. clickonwales and see how far you go. The Institute of Welsh Affairs gratefully acknowledges core funding from the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust , the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Waterloo Foundation . The following organisations are corporate members: Private Sector • Principality Building Society • The Electoral Commission Certified Accountants • Abaca Ltd • Royal Hotel Cardiff • Embassy of Ireland • Autism Cymru • Beaufort Research • Royal Mail Group Wales • Fforwm • Cartrefi Cymunedol / • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • RWE NPower Renewables • The Forestry Commission Community Housing Cymru • British Gas • S.
    [Show full text]
  • THE 422 Mps WHO BACKED the MOTION Conservative 1. Bim
    THE 422 MPs WHO BACKED THE MOTION Conservative 1. Bim Afolami 2. Peter Aldous 3. Edward Argar 4. Victoria Atkins 5. Harriett Baldwin 6. Steve Barclay 7. Henry Bellingham 8. Guto Bebb 9. Richard Benyon 10. Paul Beresford 11. Peter Bottomley 12. Andrew Bowie 13. Karen Bradley 14. Steve Brine 15. James Brokenshire 16. Robert Buckland 17. Alex Burghart 18. Alistair Burt 19. Alun Cairns 20. James Cartlidge 21. Alex Chalk 22. Jo Churchill 23. Greg Clark 24. Colin Clark 25. Ken Clarke 26. James Cleverly 27. Thérèse Coffey 28. Alberto Costa 29. Glyn Davies 30. Jonathan Djanogly 31. Leo Docherty 32. Oliver Dowden 33. David Duguid 34. Alan Duncan 35. Philip Dunne 36. Michael Ellis 37. Tobias Ellwood 38. Mark Field 39. Vicky Ford 40. Kevin Foster 41. Lucy Frazer 42. George Freeman 43. Mike Freer 44. Mark Garnier 45. David Gauke 46. Nick Gibb 47. John Glen 48. Robert Goodwill 49. Michael Gove 50. Luke Graham 51. Richard Graham 52. Bill Grant 53. Helen Grant 54. Damian Green 55. Justine Greening 56. Dominic Grieve 57. Sam Gyimah 58. Kirstene Hair 59. Luke Hall 60. Philip Hammond 61. Stephen Hammond 62. Matt Hancock 63. Richard Harrington 64. Simon Hart 65. Oliver Heald 66. Peter Heaton-Jones 67. Damian Hinds 68. Simon Hoare 69. George Hollingbery 70. Kevin Hollinrake 71. Nigel Huddleston 72. Jeremy Hunt 73. Nick Hurd 74. Alister Jack (Teller) 75. Margot James 76. Sajid Javid 77. Robert Jenrick 78. Jo Johnson 79. Andrew Jones 80. Gillian Keegan 81. Seema Kennedy 82. Stephen Kerr 83. Mark Lancaster 84.
    [Show full text]
  • Women Mps in Westminster Photographs Taken May 21St, June 3Rd, June 4Th, 2008
    “The House of Commons Works of Art Collection documents significant moments in Parliamentary history. We are delighted to have added this unique photographic record of women MPs of today, to mark the 90th anniversary of women first being able to take their seats in this House” – Hugo Swire, Chairman, The Speaker's Advisory Committee on Works of Art. “The day the Carlton Club accepted women” – 90 years after women first got the vote aim to ensure that a more enduring image of On May 21st 2008 over half of all women women's participation in the political process Members of Parliament in Westminster survives. gathered party by party to have group photographs taken to mark the anniversary of Each party gave its permission for the 90 years since women first got the vote (in photographs to be taken. For the Labour February 1918 women over 30 were first Party, Barbara Follett MP, the then Deputy granted the vote). Minister for Women and Equality, and Barbara Keeley MP, who was Chair of the Labour Party Women’s Committee and The four new composite Caroline Adams, who works for the photographs taken party by Parliamentary Labour Party helped ensure that all but 12 of the Labour women party aim to ensure that a attended. more enduring image of For the Conservative women's participation in the Party, The Shadow Leader of the House of political process survives Commons and Shadow Minister for Until now the most often used photographic Women, Theresa May image of women MPs had been the so called MP and the Chairman “Blair Babes” picture taken on 7th May 1997 of the Conservative shortly after 101 Labour women were elected Party, Caroline to Westminster as a result of positive action by Spelman MP, enlisted the Labour Party.
    [Show full text]