DOCSLIB.ORG

Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts for the Year

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Resource Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2006 Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2006 Presented pursuant to the Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000, Chapter 20, Section 6 Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed on 12th October 2006 HC 1605 LONDON: The Stationery Office £13.85 © Crown Copyright 2006 The text in this document (excluding the Royal Arms and departmental logos) may be reproduced free of charge in any format or medium providing that it is reproduced accurately and not used in a misleading context. The material must be acknowledged as Crown copyright and the title of the document specified. Any enquiries relating to the copyright in this document should be addressed to The Licensing Division, HMSO, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich, NR3 1BQ. Fax: 01603 723000 or e-mail: [email protected] Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts 2005-06 Contents Annual Report 1 Management Commentary 5 Remuneration Report 13 Statement of Accounting Officers’ Responsibilities 24 Statement on Internal Control 25 Certificate and Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General to the House of Commons 31 The Accounting Schedules: Statement of Parliamentary Supply 33 Operating Cost Statement 34 Balance Sheet 36 Cash Flow Statement 37 Consolidated Statement of Operating Costs by Departmental Aims and Objectives 37 Notes to the Accounts 40 Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts 2005-06 Annual Report The Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA) For purposes of the Department’s Resource is the Government department responsible for Accounts, the ‘Consolidated’ accounts upholding justice, rights and democracy. DCA’s represent those for the central Department as role is to drive forward the reform and defined above, while the ‘Core’ Department improvement of the legal and justice system in accounts excludes the two executive agencies. England and Wales. It is responsible for This accords with HM Treasury requirements. upholding the rule of law and for reforming and Entities within the accounting safeguarding the constitution so that they serve boundary of the Department the public effectively. 1 April 2005 saw the creation of the DCA’s new Central Department executive agency, Her Majesty’s Courts Service • Department for Constitutional Affairs (HMCS). HMCS manages a total of 650 courts Headquarters across England and Wales and employs more Responsible for supporting Ministers in policy, than 20,000 people. funding and regulatory functions as well as Principal Activities providing key services to intra-departmental entities. DCA administers the courts and tribunals in England and Wales and the legal aid budget Executive Agencies: (through sponsorship of the Legal Services Commission). • Her Majesty’s Courts Service (HMCS) Central to the delivery of justice, it is The central Department consists of a responsible for the administration of the headquarters, two executive agencies and a court system (including magistrates’ courts) number of associated offices. While in England and Wales. consolidated within the Department’s Resource Accounts, the two executive agencies also • Public Guardianship Office (PGO) publish separate agency accounts. Decisions Assists in the protection and administration relating to the day-to-day running of them of the financial affairs of individuals with remain the responsibility of their individual Chief mental incapacity. Executives. Associated Offices: The associated offices are controlled and monitored by the Department. While some • Office of the Official Solicitor and report financial performance in separate annual Public Trustee reports, only the Office of the Legal Services • Office of the Legal Services Ombudsman Ombudsman and the Office of the Legal Services Complaints Commissioner prepare • Office of the Legal Services Complaints separate statutory accounts that are audited by Commissioner the Comptroller and Auditor General. • HM Inspectorate of Court Administration The administrative functions of the Scotland • Law Commission Office (including the Office of the Advocate General for Scotland) and the Wales Office also • Council on Tribunals fall under the DCA umbrella. • Office of the Judge Advocate General • Judicial Studies Board • Commission for Judicial Appointments 1 Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts 2005-06 Scotland Office Ministers, Senior Officials and report • Scotland Office on operation of the boards Promotes the devolution settlement and represents Scottish interests within the UK Ministers Government. The Secretary of State and Lord Chancellor is • Office of the Advocate General for Scotland the Rt Hon Lord Falconer of Thoroton. For the Provides legal services and bridges the gap period from 1 April 2005 until the General between Scottish and British legal issues. Election held on 5 May 2005, he was supported by three Parliamentary Under Secretaries: Executive non-departmental public bodies: Baroness Ashton of Upholland, David Lammy MP and Christopher Leslie MP. Following the • Boundary Commission for Scotland General Election and with effect from 9 May, he Reviews the parliamentary constituencies in was supported for the remainder of the financial Scotland. year 2005-06 by a Minister of State, the Rt Hon • Commission on Boundary Differences and Harriet Harman QC, MP and two Parliamentary Voting Systems in Scotland Under Secretaries, Baroness Ashton of The Commission’s remit is to examine the Upholland and Bridget Prentice, MP. consequences of having four different Whilst the administrative functions of the systems of voting in Scotland, and different Scotland Office and the Wales Office lie with boundaries for Westminster and Scottish DCA, responsibility for the relationship between Parliament constituencies. Westminster and the devolved administrations in Edinburgh and Cardiff remained with, Wales Office respectively, the Secretary of State for Scotland • Wales Office (the Rt Hon Alistair Darling MP), and the Promotes the devolution settlement and Secretary of State for Wales (the Rt Hon Peter supports the representation of Wales within Hain MP). the UK Government. The Parliamentary Under Secretary for Scotland Executive non-departmental public (Anne McGuire MP until 9 May 2005, David bodies outside the accounting Cairns MP from 10 May 2005) and the boundary Parliamentary Under Secretary for Wales (Don Touhig MP until 9 May 2005, Nick Ainger MP • Legal Services Commission from 9 May 2005) are Ministers of the Oversees the administration of legal aid in Department, but report to the Secretary of State England and Wales. for Scotland and Wales respectively. The • Information Commissioner’s Office Advocate General for Scotland, (until 18 Reports to Parliament on aspects of data January 2006, Baroness Clark of Calton QC), is protection and freedom of information. also a Minister of the Department. Following the resignation of Baroness Clark on 18 January Both executive non-departmental public bodies 2006 to become a judge in Scotland, the fall outside the accounting boundary and functions of the Advocate General were prepare separate accounts that are audited by temporarily conferred on the Secretary of State the Comptroller and Auditor General. for Scotland under s 87 (3) of the Scotland Act Three sister Departments, the Northern Ireland 1998. On 21 March 2006, Neil Davidson QC Court Service, HM Land Registry and The was appointed Advocate General for Scotland. National Archives, also report to the Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs. Each of these has a separate Parliamentary Estimate and prepares separate accounts. 2 Department for Constitutional Affairs Resource Accounts 2005-06 Changes since the end of the financial year Moorhouse, Director General Finance; John Lyon, CB, Director General, Legal and Judicial On 5 May 2006, Vera Baird QC, MP was Services; Rod Clark, Director General, Strategy; appointed as an additional Parliamentary Under Sir Ron De Witt, KB, Chief Executive of Her Secretary. Also on 5 May 2006, Baroness Majesty’s Courts Service; Lucian Hudson, Ashton was appointed a member of the Privy Director of Communications; Clare Dodgson, Council. On the same date, the Rt Hon Douglas Chief Executive, Legal Services Commission Alexander was appointed Secretary of State for (until 31 May 2005); and Moira Wallace, Chief Scotland. Executive, Office of Criminal Justice Reform (until 2 November 2005). Clare Dodgson was The Departmental Boards replaced on the board by Brian Harvey, Acting For the period 1 April 2005 to 16 May 2005, Chief Executive of the Legal Services Ministers were supported by a Corporate Board Commission with effect from 1 September of executive and non-executive members, 2005. Moira Wallace was replaced by Jane led by the Permanent Secretary, Alex Allan. Furniss, Acting Chief Executive of the Office of Executive membership of the Corporate Board Criminal Justice Reform, with effect from 2 comprised: Alex Allan; Ian Magee, CB, Chief November 2005. Executive (Operations) and Second Permanent Independent non executive membership of the Secretary; Barbara Moorhouse, Director Ministerial Executive Board comprised: Sir General, Finance; Sir Ron De Witt, KB, Chief Peter Bonfield, CBE; Trevor Hall, CBE; the Rt Executive, Her Majesty’s Courts Services; Clare Hon Lord Justice Judge (until 27 November Dodgson, Chief Executive, Legal Services 2005); the Hon Barbara Thomas; and Professor Commission; John Lyon, CB, Director
Recommended publications
  • The Privatisation of Qinetiq

    The Privatisation of Qinetiq

    House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts The privatisation of QinetiQ Twenty–fourth Report of Session 2007–08 Report, together with formal minutes, oral and written evidence Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 12 May 2008 HC 151 Published on 10 June 2008 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Committee of Public Accounts The Committee of Public Accounts is appointed by the House of Commons to examine “the accounts showing the appropriation of the sums granted by Parliament to meet the public expenditure, and of such other accounts laid before Parliament as the committee may think fit” (Standing Order No 148). Current membership Mr Edward Leigh MP (Conservative, Gainsborough) (Chairman) Mr Richard Bacon MP (Conservative, South Norfolk) Angela Browning MP (Conservative, Tiverton and Honiton) Mr Paul Burstow MP (Liberal Democrat, Sutton and Cheam) Rt Hon David Curry MP (Conservative, Skipton and Ripon) Mr Ian Davidson MP (Labour, Glasgow South West) Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow) Angela Eagle MP (Labour, Wallasey) Nigel Griffiths MP (Labour, Edinburgh South) Rt Hon Keith Hill MP (Labour, Streatham) Mr Austin Mitchell MP (Labour, Great Grimsby) Dr John Pugh MP (Liberal Democrat, Southport) Geraldine Smith MP (Labour, Morecombe and Lunesdale) Rt Hon Don Touhig MP (Labour, Islwyn) Rt Hon Alan Williams MP (Labour, Swansea West) Phil Wilson MP (Labour, Sedgefield) The following were also Members of the Committee during the period of the enquiry: Annette Brooke MP (Liberal Democrat, Mid Dorset and Poole North) and Mr John Healey MP (Labour, Wentworth). Powers Powers of the Committee of Public Accounts are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 148.
  • Youth Citizenship Commission June 2009

    Youth Citizenship Commission June 2009

    Making the connection Building youth citizenship in the UK Final report of the Youth Citizenship Commission June 2009 Making the connection Building youth citizenship in the UK Final report of the Youth Citizenship Commission June 2009 This report is also available at the Youth Citizenship Commission’s website: www.ycc.uk.net Youth Citizenship Commission 1 Making the connection CONTENTS FOREWORD 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 SETTING THE SCENE 9 THE YOUTH CITIZENSHIP COMMISSION 12 What is the Youth Citizenship Commission? 12 Who is the Youth Citizenship Commission? 12 What has the Youth Citizenship Commission done? 13 FINDINGS 15 Who are we talking about? Profiling young people and participation 15 Theme One: Empowered citizenship 17 Theme Two: Connecting with young people 20 Theme Three: Changing the way decision-makers and institutions work 24 MAKING THE CONNECTION: SUGGESTED PRINCIPLES FOR YOUTH CITIZENSHIP ACTIVITIES 26 COMMENTARY ON RECENT INITIATIVES 27 KEY MESSAGES FOR GOVERNMENT 37 RECOMMENDATIONS 40 WHERE TO FROM HERE 66 APPENDICES I APPENDIX 1 - Reference documents i APPENDIX 2 - Youth Citizenship Commissioners iii APPENDIX 3 - Advisory Group members vii APPENDIX 4 – Timeline viii APPENDIX 5 – Stakeholders ix 2 FOREWORD The Youth Citizenship Commission was created in 2008, based upon an idea first aired in the 2007 Governance of Britain Green Paper. As a Commission, we were faced with exciting but challenging tasks. Firstly, to define what citizenship means to young people. Secondly to increase young people’s participation in politics and promote active citizenship, reflecting the communication preferences of young people. Thirdly, to lead a consultation on whether the voting age should be lowered to 16.
  • The New Eu Foreign Policy Architecture

    The New Eu Foreign Policy Architecture

    THE NEW EU FOREIGN POLICY ARCHITECTURE REVIEWING THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF THE EEAS NIKLAS HELWIG PAUL IVAN HRANT KOSTANYAN CENTRE FOR EUROPEAN POLICY STUDIES (CEPS) BRUSSELS The Centre for European Policy Studies (CEPS) is an independent policy research institute in Brussels. Its mission is to produce sound policy research leading to constructive solutions to the challenges facing Europe. The views expressed in this book are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed to CEPS or any other institution with which they are associated or to the European Union. Niklas Helwig is a Marie Curie Researcher of the EXACT network at the University of Edinburgh and Cologne and focuses on the institutional development of EU foreign policy. He worked for the Centre for European Policy Studies and the Finnish Institute of International Affairs. Paul Ivan is a Romanian diplomat. Previously, he worked as a researcher for the Centre for European Policy Studies, where he focused on EU political and institutional issues and the European External Action Service. Hrant Kostanyan is an associate research fellow at CEPS and a PhD candidate at the Centre for EU Studies at Ghent University. He worked as an external expert for International Alert, based in London, in the Eastern Europe and South Caucasus research project. He also worked as an expert on a European Commission-funded project on the EU’s relations with Russia and the Eastern Partnership at the EU Neighbourhood Info Centre. The authors thank Piotr Maciej Kaczyński for his comments on an earlier draft. ISBN 978-94-6138-262-7 © Copyright 2013, Centre for European Policy Studies and the authors.
  • The Negotiation of the European External Action Service: Theoretical and Policy Implications

    The Negotiation of the European External Action Service: Theoretical and Policy Implications

    The Negotiation of the European External Action Service: Theoretical and Policy Implications MPP Professional Paper In Partial Fulfillment of the Master of Public Policy Degree Requirements The Hubert H. Humphrey School of Public Affairs The University of Minnesota Matthew Stenberg May 6, 2011 Signature below of Paper Supervisor certifies successful completion of oral presentation and completion of final written version: _______________________________ ____________________ ___________________ Robert Kudrle, Paper Supervisor Date, presentation Date, paper completion Orville and Jane Freeman Professor of International Trade and Investment Policy ________________________________________ ___________________ Sherry Gray, Coordinator and Lecturer, Global Policy ` Date Signature of Second Committee Member, certifying successful completion of professional paper ________________________________________ ___________________ Steve Andreasen, Lecturer ` Date Signature of Third Committee Member, certifying successful completion of professional paper Stenberg 1 Abstract Supranationalist and intergovernmentalist scholars have long debated the driving forces behind European integration. The creation of the European External Action Service (EEAS) forces an examination of this debate in a different way. Many of those countries pushing for the EEAS foresaw it as an intergovernmentalist institution during the Lisbon Treaty Negotiations. Indeed, its provisions upon implementation look strikingly intergovernmental. Despite its current form, the negotiating process between the European Commission and European Parliament during 2010 was sweepingly supranational in nature, as the EP asserted its influence as a democratically elected, pan- European body to demand changes to the final form of the EEAS as well as a greater oversight role. Though the present form of the EEAS is intergovernmental, the negotiating process has indicated that a more assertive Parliament may result in greater long-term, supranational developments.
  • Facilitating Peaceful Protests

    Facilitating Peaceful Protests

    ACADEMY BRIEFING No. 5 Facilitating Peaceful Protests January 2014 Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights Geneva Académie de droit international humanitaire et de droits humains à Genève Academ The Academy, a joint centre of ISBN: 978-2-9700866-3-5 © Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights, January 2014. Acknowledgements This Academy Briefing was written by Milena Costas Trascasas, Research Fellow, and Stuart Casey-Maslen, Head of Research, at the Geneva Academy of International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights (Geneva Academy). The Academy would like to thank all those who commented on an earlier draft of this briefing, in particular Anja Bienart and Brian Wood of Amnesty International, and Neil Corney of Omega Research Foundation. The Geneva Academy would also like to thank the Swiss Federal Department of Foreign Affairs (DFAE) for its support to the Academy’s work on facilitating peaceful protests, especially the Human Security Division for its funding of the publication of this Briefing. Editing, design, and layout by Plain Sense, Geneva. Disclaimer This Academy Briefing is the work of the authors. The views expressed in it do not necessarily reflect those of the project’s supporters or of anyone who provided input to, or commented on, a draft of this Briefing. The designation of states or territories does not imply any judgement by the Geneva Academy, the DFAE, or any other body or individual, regarding the legal status of such states or territories, or their authorities and institutions, or the delimitation of their boundaries, or the status of any states or territories that border them.
  • Gill Morgan, Is Dealing with Whitehall Arrogance

    Gill Morgan, Is Dealing with Whitehall Arrogance

    plus… Jeff Jones Labour’s leadership election Nicola Porter Journalism must fight back Barry Morgan Religion and politics Dafydd Wigley Options for the referendum Andrew Shearer Garlic’s secret weapon Gill David Culshaw Decline of the honeybee Gordon James Coal in a warm climate Morgan Katija Dew Beating the crunch Gear change for our civil service Andrew Davies The Kafka Brigade Peter Finch Capturing the soul www.iwa.org.uk Winter 2009 No. 39 | £5 clickonwales ! Coming soon, our new website www. iwa.or g.u k, containing much more up-to-date news and information and with a freshly designed new look. Featuring clickonwales – the IWA’s new online service providing news and analysis about current affairs as it affects our small country. Expert contributors from across the political spectrum will be commissioned daily to provide insights into the unfolding drama of the new 21 st Century Wales – whether it be Labour’s leadership election, constitutional change, the climate change debate, arguments about education, or the ongoing problems, successes and shortcomings of the Welsh economy. There will be more scope, too, for interactive debate, and a special section for IWA members. Plus: Information about the IWA’s branches, events, and publications. This will be the must see and must use Welsh website. clickonwales and see where it takes you. clickonwales and see how far you go. The Institute of Welsh Affairs gratefully acknowledges core funding from the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust , the Esmée Fairbairn Foundation and the Waterloo Foundation . The following organisations are corporate members: Private Sector • Principality Building Society • The Electoral Commission Certified Accountants • Abaca Ltd • Royal Hotel Cardiff • Embassy of Ireland • Autism Cymru • Beaufort Research • Royal Mail Group Wales • Fforwm • Cartrefi Cymunedol / • Biffa Waste Services Ltd • RWE NPower Renewables • The Forestry Commission Community Housing Cymru • British Gas • S.
  • Bridget Prentice As an Honorary Freewoman of the London Borough of Lewisham

    Bridget Prentice As an Honorary Freewoman of the London Borough of Lewisham

    The Admission of Bridget Prentice as an Honorary Freewoman of the London Borough of Lewisham Civic Suite, Lewisham Town Hall 7.30pm on Friday 20 May 2016 Ref: 663-2a Bridget Prentice Early life Bridget Prentice was born in 1952 in Glasgow. She served as MP for Lewisham East from 1992 until 2010. She grew up in the east end of Glasgow – a poor part of the city – with her parents, two older brothers, younger sister and extended family nearby. She describes her childhood as a mix of good and bad times. She recalls realising at a young age that some of her friends were even less well off than her family. “My parents instilled in us a sense of what was right and wrong. They taught us that there were others worse off and instead of moaning about our own My parents predicament, that we should help others.” instilled in us a sense of what This early development of Bridget’s social consciousness would eventually propel her into was right a career in politics. and wrong Bridget’s parents saw education as the way to move on in the world. Bridget enjoyed learning things which gave her a life-long enthusiasm for education and encouraged her to become a teacher. “I think teaching is the most important thing anybody does. Seeing young people suddenly ‘get it’ is just the most exciting moment.” 3 Bridget addressing a packed Entering politics office she recollects one she is very proud of, the House of Commons on the The political bug hit Bridget quite early in life.
  • Profile Catherine Ashton

    Profile Catherine Ashton

    profile Catherine Ashton European Commissioner for Trade Catherine Ashton was born in Upholland in Lancashire, from where she takes her title, Baroness Ashton of Upholland. From 1983-89 she was Director of Business in the Community, and established the Employers' Forum on Disability, Opportunity Now, and the Windsor Fellowship. Catherine Ashton chaired the Health Authority in Hertfordshire from 1998 to 2001, and became a Vice President of the National Council for One Parent Families. In 1999 Catherine Ashton became a life peer. She was made Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State in the Department for Education and Skills in 2001, and then Parliamentary Under-Secretary in the Department for Constitutional Affairs and subsequently Ministry of Justice with responsibilities for human rights, freedom of information and equalities. She became a Privy Councillor in May 2006. Catherine Ashton was appointed Leader of the House of Lords and Lord President of the Council in Gordon Brown’s first Cabinet in June 2007. As well as Leader of the Lords, she took responsibility in the House of Lords for equalities issues. In 2005 Catherine Ashton was voted House Magazine Minister of the Year and Channel 4 Peer of the Year. In 2006, she was voted Stonewall Politician of the Year. Catherine Ashton brings with her significant European experience, including steering the Lisbon Treaty through the UK's upper chamber and dealing with EU justice and home affairs issues in her previous positions. During her time as Director of Business in the Community, Catherine Ashton worked together with companies and communities on creating effective business strategies, while ensuring equality and diversity in the workforce.
  • Draft Explanatory Memorandum

    Draft Explanatory Memorandum

    EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM TO THE REPRESENTATION OF THE PEOPLE (AMENDMENT) REGULATIONS 2008 No. DRAFT 1. This explanatory memorandum has been prepared by the Ministry of Justice and is laid before Parliament by Command of Her Majesty. 2. Description 2.1 These Regulations make amendments to: • Parts 7 and 8 of the Representation of the People (England and Wales) Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/341) (“the E&W 2001 Regulations”), as amended. • Part 7 of the Representation of the People (Scotland) Regulations 2001 (S.I. 2001/497) (“the Scotland 2001 Regulations”), as amended. 2.2 The purpose of these regulations is to introduce a new fee structure payable by persons who may be supplied with copies of the marked registers of electors, lists of postal voters, proxy voters and proxy postal voters (defined as “marked registers or lists” in regulation 116 of the E&W 2001 Regulations and the Scotland 2001 Regulations). At present, the fee for supply of the marked register or lists produced at Parliamentary or local government elections in England and Wales, and Parliamentary elections in Scotland, is the same as the fee charged for sale of information in the full electoral register. 2.3 Regulation 1 of these Regulations provides for their citation, commencement and extent. Regulation 2 makes transitional provision to ensure that they do not have any effect on a request for a copy of the marked register or lists that was made before the regulations come into force. 2.4 Regulation 4 provides that any marked notices which amended the electoral register used at a Parliamentary or local election are part of the “marked register or lists” (as defined by regulation 116(1) of the E&W 2001 Regulations) which may be supplied in accordance with Parts 7 and 8 of the E&W 2001 Regulations.
  • P R E S S EN EU High Representative Catherine Ashton Chairs Middle

    P R E S S EN EU High Representative Catherine Ashton Chairs Middle

    EUROPEAN UNION Brussels, 4 February 2011 A 044/11 EU High Representative Catherine Ashton chairs Middle East Quartet Ministerial meeting in Munich Catherine Ashton, European Union High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, will chair the first meeting of the Middle East Quartet principles of 2011 on Saturday, February 5. She will be joined in the meeting -- which takes place in the margins of the Munich Security Conference -- by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Quartet Envoy Tony Blair. Catherine Ashton said ahead of the meeting: "This meeting comes at a crucial time when we are witnessing significant events in the Middle East region. It is therefore extremely important that we stay the course in the Middle East Peace Process. We must remain focused on making progress on a negotiated peace agreement between Israel and Palestine -- a key component in bringing about peace and stability in the wider region." During her time in Munich, Catherine Ashton will also hold a number of bilateral discussions, including with Secretary of State Clinton on EU-US relations, Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai and Ban Ki-moon ahead of her upcoming trip to New York (Feb 6-9). Catherine Ashton will hold a press conference at approximately 1600 hours, following the Quartet meeting. This will be followed by remarks to the Munich Security Council on the wider Middle East. Video footage will be provided by EBS. ____________________ P R E S S FOR FURTHER DETAILS: Maja Kocijancic +32 498 984 425 - +32 2 298 65 70 - [email protected] Darren Ennis +32 498 963 293 - +32 2 296 32 93 - [email protected] [email protected] www.eeas.europa.eu EN .
  • First President of the European Council European Union Center of North Carolina EU Briefings, March 2010

    First President of the European Council European Union Center of North Carolina EU Briefings, March 2010

    Policy Area: First President of the European Council European Union Center of North Carolina EU Briefings, March 2010 The First President of the European Council Years of soul-searching and institutional introspection preceded the Lisbon Treaty’s coming into force. The new EU structure was expected to resolve the decade-long question: “who do you call when you want to speak with Europe?” For candidates who could pick up that imaginary EU phone, Lisbon created two new top jobs: a High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, and a President of the European Council. While another brief in this series (www.unc.edu/depts/europe/business_media/busbrief1004-high-rep.htm) focuses on Europe's first High Representative, this paper zeros in on the first EU Council President. The election by the EU Heads of State and Government of the little-known Belgian Herman van Rompuy for that post generated surprise and skepticism. But when taking into account the lingering practical institutional challenges that have to be addressed, or when aiming for coordination rather than initiative, Van Rompuy could be considered a successful pick. This brief assesses how the EU came to his election and touches upon what is to be expected of the new EU Council President. On December 1, 2009, the long-awaited Lisbon Treaty came into force. For the EU Council – the EU Heads of State and Government – this means that it has become an official EU institution. And while the rotating six-month country-presidency remains in existence, the Council will now also have a permanent president.
  • Foundation Stage Profile Handbook 1 Introduction Recording Children’S Development

    Foundation Stage Profile Handbook 1 Introduction Recording Children’S Development

    Early years Investing in our future Early years Foundation Stage Profile practitioners Handbook Settings in receipt of government funding to provide early years education and schools with nursery and reception aged children Date of issue: 01/03 Ref: QCA/03/1006 First published in 2003. © Qualifications and Curriculum Authority 2003. Reproduction, storage, adaptation or translation, in any form or by any means, of this publication is prohibited without the prior written permission of the publisher, unless within the terms of licences issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency. Excerpts may be reproduced for the purpose of research, private study, criticism or review, or by educational institutions solely for educational purposes, without permission, providing full acknowledgement is given. Printed in Great Britain. The Qualifications and Curriculum Authority is an exempt charity under Schedule 2 of the Charities Act 1993. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority 83 Piccadilly London W1J 8QA www.qca.org.uk Foreword by Baroness Catherine Ashton Parliamentary Under Secretary of State for Sure Start, Early Years and Childcare The introduction of the foundation stage in September 2000 was widely welcomed by early years practitioners. It gave this very important stage of education a distinct identity. The early learning goals set high expectations for the end of the foundation stage, but expectations that are achievable for most children who have followed a relevant curriculum. We published Curriculum guidance for the foundation stage to help practitioners understand what the goals mean for children aged three to five throughout the foundation stage. The guidance shows what practitioners need to do to help children make good progress towards, and where appropriate beyond, the goals.