DOCSLIB.ORG

Constructing Legends and Traditions in the Medieval Balkans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Constructing Legends and Traditions in the Medieval Balkans Chapter 3 Basil versus Samuel: Constructing Legends and Traditions in the Medieval Balkans Byzantine authors of the 11th century began to narrate the events related to Samuel’s State and the battle of Kleidion, after the anti-Byzantine rebellions arose in the Balkans in the 1040’s and 1070’s. This was the time when traditions related to Samuel were invoked by the leaders of the rebellions which inevi- tably provoked both military action and literary response from the Byzantine elite.1 At the beginning of 12th century, the Continuator of Skylitzes, who was probably Skylitzes himself, continuing his narrative to include the period up to 1079, made a brief reference to the conquest of Samuel’s State while introduc- ing the Balkan rebellions: When the emperor Basil brought Bulgaria into subjection he was not will- ing whatsoever to bring in new measures or to disturb the existing state of affairs. He wanted matters to remain on the same footing and to be administered in the way Samuel who was their ruler had ordained: that each possessing a yoke of oxen should give to the public purse a measure of grain, the same amount of millet and a jar of wine.2 One gets the impression that the Continuator of Skylitzes in referring to tradi- tions and customs of Samuel’s subjects, did not apply an ethnic term, but used the conventional administrative-ecclesiastical designation “Bulgaria”. We are not in a position to perceive how the leaders of the rebellions identified them- selves, nor how they recognized their ancestors and perceived the state that they were striving to re-establish. The same applies to the people that revolted under their leadership against Byzantium. What we have from the sources is solely the projected terminology and interpretation of the Byzantines and their acknowledgement that the leaders invoked traditions from the imperial dynasty which had ruled Samuel’s State. 1 Recently, Holmes, Basil II and the Governance of Empire, 233 suggested that since the end of 11th century there was a tendency among the Byzantine authors to promote aristocrat- ic support for Balkan’s campaigns of Alexius I Komnenos. Stephenson, Legend of Basil the Bulgar-slayer, 71 argue that the trend of linking the Komnenos dynasty with Basil II resulted in staging the initial process of reviving the reputation of Basil II. 2 Skylitzes Continuatus, ed. Tsolakes, 162. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2019 | doi:10.1163/9789004394292_005 102 Chapter 3 Nikephoros Bryennios, who was writing his History in the early twelfth cen- tury, used the ethnonym “Slavs” to designate the rebels under the leadership of George Vojteh in 1072/3 who were pursuing the agenda of re-establishing Samuel’s State in Macedonia. He stated that the “Slavic people (Σθλαβίνων ἔθνους) threw off the Roman yoke and laid waste the territory of the Bulgarians taking plunder and leaving scorched earth”, and apart sacking Skopje and Niš attacked all the towns between Sirmium and Vidin.3 This account clearly shows that the term “Bulgarians” did not have ethnic meaning, but was used to desig- nate the Byzantine land which was attacked by the rebels. Correspondingly, he praised his grandfather Bryennios who as “dux of all the land of the Bulgarians”, succeeded in “softening the Slavic people so that they are once again under the yoke of the Romans, and they gladly accept that he is commanding Bulgaria”.4 The term “land of Bulgarians” was evidently used by Bryennios to distinguish the administrative territory under Byzantine possession, not to designate the ethnic identity of the people that inhabited it. Nikephoros Bryennios refrained from making a comparison of the con- temporary Balkan rebellions with the Basil II’s wars with Samuel. He did, however, mention Samuel, but in reference to Ekatherina, the wife of the em- peror Isaak I Komnenos (1057–1059), claiming that she was the daughter of the “Bulgarian emperor Samuel” (βασιλέως Βουλγάρων Σαμουὴλ).5 Elsewhere, he referred to the links with Samuel deriving from Maria, the wife of Andronikos Doukas, who was the son of the caesar John Doukas and Eirene Pegonitissa. He noted that Andronikos’ wife was related with the “Bulgarian emperor Samuel on her father’s side, being the daughter of his son Trajan”.6 It becomes clear that Bryennnios sought to demonstrate the links between the Byzantine im- perial family and the descendants of Samuel’s dynasty. However, this claim was most probably inaccurate, having in mind the scholarly consensus that Ekatherina was the daughter of John Vladislav, while the wife of Andronikos Doukas, Maria was the daughter of Vladislav’s son Trajan. Furthermore, Eirene Doukaina, the daughter from the marriage of Maria and Andronikos Doukas, became the wife of Alexius I. Regardless of Bryennnios’ historical correctness 3 Nicеphore Bryennios histoire, ed. and tr. Paul Gautier, CFHB 9 (Bruxelles: Byzantion, 1979), 3.1 (pp. 210–211). It is interesting that this passage was interpreted by Gautier in his notes to the edition of the text in ethnic terms, as rebellion of the “Bulgarians in Western Macedonia” (Bryennios, ed. Gautier, 210, n. 1). Tăpkova Zaimova in her commentary identified the Slavs mentioned in the text as “Bulgarians from Macedonia” (Tăpkova Zaimova, Bălgari rodom, 113). 4 Bryennios 3.3, ed. Gautier, 213. 5 Bryennios 1.2, ed. Gautier, 77. 6 Bryennios 3.6, ed. Gautier, 219..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger – the First One Not to Become a Blind Man? Political and Military History of the Bryennios Family in the 11Th and Early 12Th Century
    Studia Ceranea 10, 2020, p. 31–45 ISSN: 2084-140X DOI: 10.18778/2084-140X.10.02 e-ISSN: 2449-8378 Marcin Böhm (Opole) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-3176 Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger – the First One Not to Become a Blind Man? Political and Military History of the Bryennios Family in the 11th and Early 12th Century ikephoros Bryennios the Younger (1062–1137) has a place in the history N of the Byzantine Empire as a historian and husband of Anna Komnene (1083–1153), a woman from the imperial family. His historical work on the his- tory of the Komnenian dynasty in the 11th century is an extremely valuable source of information about the policies of the empire’s major families, whose main goal was to seize power in Constantinople1. Nikephoros was also a talented commander, which he proved by serving his father-in-law Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) and brother-in-law John II Komnenos (1118–1143). The marriage gave him free access to people and documents which he also enriched with the history of his own family. It happened because Nikephoros Bryennios was not the first representative of his family who played an important role in the internal policy of the empire. He had two predecessors, his grandfather, and great grand- father, who according to the family tradition had the same name as our hero. They 1 J. Seger, Byzantinische Historiker des zehnten und elften Jahrhunderts, vol. I, Nikephoros Bryennios, München 1888, p. 31–33; W. Treadgold, The Middle Byzantine Historians, Basingstoke 2013, p. 344–345; A.
    [Show full text]
  • 0584-98881249243K.Pdf
    Zbornik radova Vizantolo{kog instituta HßÇH, 2012 Recueil des travaux de l’Institut d’etudes byzantines XßIX, 2012 UDC: 94:355.426Š(495.02)"12/13" DOI:10.2298/ZRVI1249243K SAVVAS KYRIAKIDIS (University of Johannesburg, South Africa) THE IDEA OF CIVIL WAR IN THIRTEENTH AND FOURTEENTH-CENTURY — BYZANTIUM This paper discusses thirteenth and fourteenth-century Byzantine perceptions of civil wars, which were a common feature in the late Byzantine period. It investi- gates how the most important authors of the period understood and defined the idea of civil war. It explores the Byzantine understanding of the differences between mil- itary conflicts which were fought between subjects and employees of the emperor and wars the empire fought against its external enemies. In addition, it examines the views the imperial authorities and the authors of the period express about wars against enemies with whom the later Byzantines shared a common cultural, ethnic and religious background. Key words: Civil war, Nicaea, Pachymeres, Kantakouzenos, Akropolites This article will examine thirteenth and fourteenth-century Byzantine con- cepts of armed conflicts which can be defined as civil wars (emfulioi polemoi). Wars between aristocratic clans and between members of the inner imperial fam- ily were a common feature in the later Byzantine period. However, not many scholars have attempted to provide a definition of the idea of civil war in late By- zantium. In his discussion of Byzantine attitudes towards warfare, W. Treadgold suggested ‘as a working definition of Byzantine civil war an armed conflict in which a significant number of Byzantine soldiers fought on both sides with a sig- nificant number of casualties.’1 This is a reasonable definition and, possibly, ap- plicable to most internal conflicts in Byzantium before 1204.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment? John A
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons Finance Faculty Publications Department of Finance 2008 Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment? John A. Doukas Old Dominion University, [email protected] Chansog (Francis) Kim Christos Pantzalis Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/finance_facpubs Part of the Corporate Finance Commons, and the Finance Commons Repository Citation Doukas, John A.; Kim, Chansog (Francis); and Pantzalis, Christos, "Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment?" (2008). Finance Faculty Publications. 21. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/finance_facpubs/21 Original Publication Citation Doukas, J. A., Kim, C., & Pantzalis, C. (2008). Do analysts influence corporate financing and investment? Financial Management, 37(2), 303-339. doi:10.1111/j.1755-053X.2008.00014.x This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Finance at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Finance Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Do Analysts Influence Corporate Financing and Investment? John A. Doukas, Chansog (Francis) Kim, and Christos Pantzalis∗ We examine whether abnormal analyst coverage influences the external financing and investment decisions of the firm. Controlling for self-selection bias in analysts’ excessive coverage, we find that firms with high (low) analyst coverage consistently engage in higher (lower) external financing than do their industry peers of similar size. Our evidence also demonstrates that firms with excessive analyst coverage overinvest and realize lower future returns than do firms with low analyst coverage. Our findings are consistent with the hypothesis that analysts favor the coverage of firms that have the potential to engage in profitable investment-banking business.
    [Show full text]
  • Masterarbeit / Master´S Thesis
    MASTERARBEIT / MASTER´S THESIS Titel der Masterarbeit / Title of the Master´s Thesis „Marriage Strategies in the Early Palaiologan Period“ verfasst von / submitted by Konstantina Gerakini angestrebter akademischer Grad / in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts (MA) Wien, 2018 / Vienna 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt / A 066 869 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt / Masterstudium Byzantinistik und Neogräzistik degree programme as it appears on the student record sheet: Betreut von / Supervisor: Univ.- Prof. Dr. Claudia Rapp TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 3 INTRODUCTION The historical frame 4 Late Byzantine aristocracy: definition and state of research 6 Methodological approach 7 The Structure of the Thesis 8 The Sources 9 I. THE ARISTOCRACY IN THE EARLY PALAIOLOGAN PERIOD I.1. The Byzantine aristocracy: definition and terminology 13 Ranks and offices in the early Palaiologan period 18 The self-consciousness of the aristocracy 21 I.2.The Palaiologan high aristocracy 23 II. MARRIAGE STRATEGIES OF THE ARISTOCRACY IN THE EARLY PALAIOLOGAN PERIOD II.1. Marriage strategies of the aristocracy from the tenth to thirteenth century 41 Marriage strategies of the military aristocracy of the tenth century 41 Marriage strategies of the aristocratic families of the eleventh and twelfth centuries. The Komnenoi and the Doukai 44 Marriage strategies of the Angeloi and the Laskarids 49 II.2. Marriage strategies until 1259. The rise of the Palaiologoi 51 Marriage strategies of the Laskarids and other families of the aristocracy 57 1 II.3. Marriage strategies in the reign of Michael VIII Palaiologos (1259-1282) 62 II.4.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118)
    The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Dr. phil., vorgelegt dem Fachbereich 07 Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz von João Vicente de Medeiros Publio Dias aus São Paulo, Brasilien 2020 Dekan: 1. Gutachter: 2. Gutachter: Tag des Prüfungskolloquiums: 18. Juli 2018 Dedicado a Dai Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 1 Note on translation and transliteration .................................................................................. 2 i. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 i.i. Bibliographic Review ...................................................................................................... 4 i.ii Conceptual and Theoretical Issues on Political Opposition in Byzantium ...................... 7 i.iii Sources .......................................................................................................................... 18 i.iii.i Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios .......................................................... 24 i.iii.ii The Alexiad of Anna Komnene ................................................................................. 26 i.iii.iii The Epitome Historion of Ioannes Zonaras .............................................................. 30 i.iii.iv The Chronike
    [Show full text]
  • John Taronites (Sebastos)
    John Taronites (sebastos) John Taronites (sebastos). Wikipedia open wikipedia design. John Taronites (Greek: Ἰωάννης ΤαÏωνίτης) was a Byzantine aristocrat who served as provincial governor in the Balkans under his uncle, Emperor Alexios I Komnenos. Biography[edit]. John's father, the panhypersebastos Michael Taronites, belonged to the aristocratic family of the Taronitai, a clan of princely Armenian origin from Taron. In ca. John Taronites (sebastos). Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php? title=Category:Sebastoi&oldid=836537836". Only one is attested with certainty, Constantine Doukas, a sebastos, polemis further identifies two Doukas women as two of Michaels daughters. The first is a certain Theodora Doukaina, attested in an epigram as married to a Theodore, polemis considers her as the mother of Euphrosyne Doukaina, Michaels granddaughter, whose father was also named Theodore. English examples for "Taronites" - Gregory Taronites was an Armenian prince who became a senior Byzantine general. Michael Taronites, Alexios's brother-in-law, was first awarded this title and regarded as almost equal to a Caesar. Eight years earlier Samuel had defeated the governor of Thessalonica, Gregory Taronites. John Doukas was married around 1146 to a woman later known as Maria, a Taronitissa,[9] possibly daughter of John Taronites, pansebastos sebastos. The couple had at least two children: Maria (c.1154-1208/1217), married firstly to Amalric I of Jerusalem; from this marriage she had a daughter, the future Isabella I of Jerusalem and then married secondly to Balian of Ibelin, amongst the children produced from this marriage was John of Ibelin, the Old Lord of Beirut.
    [Show full text]
  • From Huns Into Persians: the Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries
    From Huns into Persians: The Projected Identity of the Turks in the Byzantine Rhetoric of Eleventh and Twelfth Centuries By Roman Shliakhtin Supervisor: Daniel Ziemann, Niels Gaul Submitted to the Medieval Studies Department Central European University, Budapest In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Medieval Studies CEU eTD Collection Budapest 2016 1 Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor professor Niels Gaul who fostered my talents and supported me. His care and trust helped me to overcome many obstacles I met on the way and stimulated me to challenge my own limits and systematize my results. I express gratitude to my supervisor Daniel Ziemann and to the pre-defense committee members Volker Menze and Tijana Krstic. I also thank my first teacher Rustam Shukurov who encouraged me to start the project in 2007 and keeps supporting me with his friendship and advice up to the present day. I thank my colleagues and friends Mariana Bodnaruk, Marijana Vukovic, Andras Kraft and Divna Manolova who read parts of this dissertation at the later stage. I express my gratitude to my mentor and the former head of the Dumbarton Oaks Byzantine Studies Program, professor Michael Maas who commented on the methodology of the project. I also thank Head of the PhD Program Alice Choyke and PhD Coordinator Csilla Dobos for their patience and help. I express my appreciation to the following specialists for sharing their expertise and providing feedback on my project: Mary Cunningham, Leslie Brubaker, Michael Jeffreys, Elizabeth Jeffreys, Michael Angold, Mark Whittow, Ingella Nilsson, Ruth Macrides and Paul Magdalino.
    [Show full text]
  • © in This Web Service Cambridge University
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-00945-5 - Heroes and Romans in Twelfth-Century Byzantium: The Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios Leonora Neville Index More information Index Note: Emperors are indexed under their first name and regnal number; other Byzantine personalities are indexed by family name. Abbasid Caliphate, dissolution of 65–66 ambiguity of Nikephoros’s presentation 2, Achilles, as archetype of bravery 189 25–28, 159–70, 204 adoption, role in Roman society/politics 107–08 campaign against Bryennios (the elder) 15, adversity, character shown by responses to 25–26, 72–73, 100–02, 115–16, 125, 166, 90–91, 94–95, 97, 212 186–87 Aemilius Paulus Macedonicus, L. 44, 45, 105, compared with classical models 40, 41, 184–85 106, 107, 184–85 death 19–20, 21–22, 23, 24, 26 Agathias 32–33 defeat of Basilakes 187–88 agency, theories of 195 deviousness 91–92, 99–103, 126–28, 159, 166, Agrippina the Younger, Empress (mother of 169–70, 176, 186, 188–92, 193 Nero) 153 divergence from Roman classical ideals Aimilianos 214 102–03, 170 Alans epithets applied to 159–60, 212, 213–14 designation 85 exploitation of Konstantios’s naivete 168–69 service as mercenaries 70–71 as favoured by Providence 115–16, 117–20, 187 Alexander Severus, Emperor 154 fulsome language undercut by foolishness of Alexander the Great 40–41, 198 behavior 163–65, 170, 185 Alexiad (Anna Komnene) 7, 17, 23, 25, 26, 30, 41, grants of land to supporters 178 57, 68, 182–93 initial description 160–61 authorial presence 194 legitimacy of Imperial claim 6, 75, 77–79 creation
    [Show full text]
  • Anna Komnene: a Woman of Power Without a Crown Anna Alioto Marquette University
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Jablonowski Award (Best Undergraduate Research History Department Paper, History) 12-1-2011 Anna Komnene: A Woman of Power Without a Crown Anna Alioto Marquette University 2012 winner of the Jablonowski Award for best undergraduate research paper, awarded by the Department of History. Anna Komnene: A Woman of Power Without a Crown Anna Alioto History 3210: Middle Ages Term Paper 12/01/11 Dr. Knox 1 1 Barrett, Tracy. Anna of Byzantium. (New York: Delacorte, 1999), cover. Anna Komnene: A Woman of Power without a Crown “Time…sweeps up and carries away with it everything that has seen the light of day and plunges it into utter darkness…”2 Anna Komnene’s opening statement to her book, The Alexiad, paints a very vivid picture for her readers. This motivation inspired Anna to write The Alexiad, a historical narrative about her father and her life growing up in Constantinople. Although it was written later in life, it reflects her earlier years filled with political turmoil, foreign invasions and increasing conflicts with Western Europe. She compliments her father’s accomplishments and adds in her own thoughts which not only reflect her intelligence but also her increasing power during her father’s reign as the first born child. Surrounded by influential and powerful women such as Maria of Alania, her grandmother, Anna Dalassene and her mother, Irene Doukaina, it is no surprise that Anna grew up not only as a strong and independent woman but as an influential player in Byzantine politics regardless of her gender. She set her goal high: to rule Byzantium with her husband, Nicephoros Bryennios.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Seals from the Ras Fortress*
    Зборник радова Византолошког института L, 2013 Recueil des travaux de l’Institut d’études byzantines L, 2013 UDC: 929.651(495.02)(497.11)"09/10" DOI: 10.2298/ZRVI1350449I VUJADIN IVANIŠEVIĆ (Archeological Institute, Belgrade) BOJANA KRSMANOVIĆ (Institute for Byzantine Studies of the SASA, Belgrade) BYZANTINE SEALS FROM THE RAS FORTRESS* In this paper, seals found at the location of the Ras fortress (Tvrđava Ras) have been published. Inscriptions on these seals show that they used to belong to persons which could be identifi ed with certain military commanders who served under Alexios I Komnenos. The seals in question are: the seals of protonobelissimos Eustathios Kamytzes, Constantine Dalassenos Doukas, protoproedros and doux Constantine Kekaumenos and a certain person called Alexios. Keywords: seal, Alexios I Komennos, Nicholas Synesios, Eustathios Kamytzes, Constantine Dalassenos Doukas, Constantine Kekaumenos. The number of published seals found on medieval sites in Serbia does not even come close to the signifi cance of this territory in the provincial organization of the Byzantine Empire. Owing to the efforts of Ljubomir Maksimović and Marko Popović, the fi ndings from Serbia, which are kept in the collections of the Museum of the Serbian Orthodox Church in Belgrade and in the National Museum in Belgrade, have been systematically published.1 Most of these seals originate from Braničevo – one of the main strongholds of the Byzantine Empire on the Danubian frontier.2 The fi ndings based on the sigillographic material found in Sirmium are particularly important, despite the fact that they have yet to be fully examined.3 * This study is part of the projects nos 177021 and 177032 of the Serbian Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development.
    [Show full text]
  • The Early Palaiologan Court (1261-1354)
    THE EARLY PALAIOLOGAN COURT (1261-1354) by FROUKE MARIANNE SCHRIJVER A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Institute of Archaeology and Antiquity College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2012 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The complex phenomena ‘court’ and ‘court society’ have received increasing interest in academic research over recent years. The court of late Byzantium, however, has been overlooked, despite the fact that assumptions have been made about the influence of Byzantine court ceremonial on ceremonies in the late Medieval and Early Modern West and about the imitation of the Byzantine court as an institution in the early Ottoman empire. In the discussion of these influences late Byzantine sources were left untouched, a neglect that underlines the need for a comprehensive study of the court in this period. The aim of the present thesis is to fill a part of this gap in our knowledge through an examination of the core of the court in early Palaiologan Byzantium (1261-1354).
    [Show full text]
  • RECONCILING NIKEPHOROS BRYENNIOS' MATERIALS for a HISTORY a Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillme
    THE SONG REMAINS THE SAME: RECONCILING NIKEPHOROS BRYENNIOS’ MATERIALS FOR A HISTORY A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Master of Humanities By JAMES GILMER M.A., American Public University System, 2012 2019 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL [August 22nd, 2019] I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY JAMES GILMER ENTITLED The Song Remains the Same: Reconciling Nikephoros Bryennios’ Materials for a History BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF HUMANITIES. Jeannette Marchand, PhD Thesis Director Valerie Stoker, PhD Director, Master of Humanities Program Committee on Final Examination: [Jeannette Marchand, PhD] [Paul Lockhart, PhD] [Aaron Wolpert] [Valerie Stoker, PhD] Barry Milligan, PhD Interim Dean of the Graduate School ABSTRACT Gilmer, James. M.Hum. Graduate Program, Wright State University, 2019. The Song Remains the Same: Reconciling Nikephoros Bryennios’ Materials for a History. The following thesis presents new perspectives on the representation of Byzantine generals during the eleventh century, focusing specifically on parallel representations of Nikephoros Bryennios the Elder. I will argue that Byzantine chroniclers routinely employed the language of Byzantine military manuals as a template to describe the generals who populate the pages of their works. This tendency created a shared language of praise and censure which chroniclers applied to the generals whose reputation they sought either to exalt or to tarnish. The career of Nikephoros Bryennios the Elder as it is presented in the History of Michael Attaleiates and the Materials for a History of Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger vividly demonstrates this tendency as Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger attempts to salvage the reputation of his grandfather.
    [Show full text]