DOCSLIB.ORG

The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

The Political Opposition to Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) Inauguraldissertation zur Erlangung des Akademischen Grades eines Dr. phil., vorgelegt dem Fachbereich 07 Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz von João Vicente de Medeiros Publio Dias aus São Paulo, Brasilien 2020 Dekan: 1. Gutachter: 2. Gutachter: Tag des Prüfungskolloquiums: 18. Juli 2018 Dedicado a Dai Table of Contents Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................... 1 Note on translation and transliteration .................................................................................. 2 i. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 3 i.i. Bibliographic Review ...................................................................................................... 4 i.ii Conceptual and Theoretical Issues on Political Opposition in Byzantium ...................... 7 i.iii Sources .......................................................................................................................... 18 i.iii.i Material for History of Nikephoros Bryennios .......................................................... 24 i.iii.ii The Alexiad of Anna Komnene ................................................................................. 26 i.iii.iii The Epitome Historion of Ioannes Zonaras .............................................................. 30 i.iii.iv The Chronike Diegesis of Niketas Choniates ........................................................... 32 i.iii.v The Non-Historiographical Sources .......................................................................... 35 1. The background of Alexios I Komnenos’ reign (1042–1081) ........................................ 42 1.1 The Role of the Aristocracy in the Middle Byzantine Period ....................................... 42 1.2 The Political Conditions during the 11th century ......................................................... 53 1.2.1 The End of the Macedonian Dynasty and the Legitimacy Crisis ............................... 53 1.2.2 The Role of the People in the Political Process and the Expansion of the Senate ..... 55 1.2.3 New Enemies: Military Challenges for the Empire and State Reforms ..................... 58 1.2.4 The Reign of Isaakios I Komnenos (1057–1059): a Komnenos for the First Time on the Throne ........................................................................................................................... 61 1.2.5 From Konstantinos X Doukas (1059–1068) to Nikephoros III Botaneiates (1078– 1081) ................................................................................................................................... 65 1.2.6 The “Vicious Circle” of the 11th century: the Generous Pragmatism and the State- conservative Reformers ....................................................................................................... 68 2. The Family History of the Doukai and Komnenoi from the 10th Century to 1081 ........ 71 2.1. The Doukai ................................................................................................................... 71 2.2 The Komnenoi ............................................................................................................... 77 2.3. Observations on the Political Careers of the Doukai and the Komnenoi until 1081 .... 84 2.4. The Rebellion of the Komnenoi in April 1081 ............................................................. 87 3. 1081–1091: Building an Internal Status Quo in Face of External Threats and Internal Discontentment.................................................................................................................... 98 3.1 The imperial concessions .............................................................................................. 98 3.2. Alexios and Constantinople: Traces of a Difficult Relationship ................................ 101 3.3 Pretenders and Foreign Enemies ................................................................................. 107 3.4 The Komnenos-Doukas Relation: Struggle for Hegemony and Building of a Status Quo ........................................................................................................................................... 113 3.4.1 First Conflicts after the Seizure of Power in 1081 ................................................... 114 3.4.2 The Role of Anna Dalassene in Alexios I’s Reign ................................................... 115 3.4.3 The Rise and Fall of Maria of Alania ....................................................................... 122 3.4.4 The Leon of Chalcedon Controversy: 1081–1095 ................................................... 125 3.5 Summary of the Period between 1081 and 1091: the Capacity and Limitations of the Komnenian Patrimonial Regime ....................................................................................... 131 4. 1091–1100: The Rise of the Porphyrogennetoi and the Anemas Conspiracy .............. 137 4.1 The Diogenes Crisis and the Uprising of the Porphyrogennetoi (1094–1096) ........... 138 4.1.1 The Diogenai after Manzikert .................................................................................. 138 4.1.2 The Conspiracy near Serres: Anna Komnene’s account. ......................................... 140 4.1.2.1 The Conspirators ................................................................................................... 143 4.1.2.2 The Making of the Nikephoros Diogenes Conspiracy and its Causes .................. 147 4.2 The Synod of Blachernae in 1095: Recasting the Komnenian Alliance ..................... 153 4.3 The Anemas Conspiracy ............................................................................................. 161 4.4 The Doukas after 1095 ................................................................................................ 169 4.5 A Summary of the Events between 1091 and 1100 .................................................... 173 5. 1100–1118: The Stabilization of the Regime and Uprisings in the Provinces .............. 176 5.1 Crete and Cyprus ......................................................................................................... 176 5.2 Trebizond .................................................................................................................... 181 5.3 The Aaron Conspiracy (1107) ..................................................................................... 186 5.4 Eastern Provinces, Paulicians in Thracia and Michael of Amastris ............................ 188 5.5 General Conclusions for the Period between 1100 and 1118 ...................................... 195 6. Ideology and Political Struggles ................................................................................... 197 6.1. The Ideological Basis of the Opposition .................................................................... 198 6.2 The (Lack of) Imperial Repression ............................................................................. 209 6.3 The Relations Between Emperor, People, and Church ............................................... 215 6.3.1 Ecclesiastical and Political Struggles during the Reign of Alexios I Komnenos ..... 218 6.3.2 Alexios Komnenos and the People ........................................................................... 222 6.4 An Outline of Alexios I’s Response to Opposition ..................................................... 225 7. Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 227 Appendix: the Genealogical Tree of the Families Doukas and Komnenos from their First Known Member to 1118 ................................................................................................... 234 Abreviations ...................................................................................................................... 235 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................... 239 Acknowledgements A doctorate is much more than the result of research work, especially when one has to leave behind family, friends and home and move to a new and unknown country. If this undertaking was successful in the end, it was because I had the support of several people. Firstly, I would like to register my appreciation to my supervisor for accepting me as a PhD student and supporting me since my first contact per e-mail written in a sufferable German in 2011. Since my arrival – and even before that – I could count with the constant support of my colleagues in Mainz, whose inputs were crucial for the advance of my work. There were also other people who at some point of my doctorate helped me in several – and sometimes unconscious – ways: by reading and commenting some pages of the thesis, providing me with unknown literature, sending me works to which I did not have access or simply engaging with me in a particularly enlightening conversation.. I want to show my appreciation to the funding bodies Deutscher Akademischer Austauchdienst (DAAD) and Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). CAPES financed my flight tickets to Germany and DAAD granted me a scholarship between 2012 and 2016. This financial support allowed me to dedicate all my energy to the research work. Financing
Recommended publications
  • Doctoral Dissertation Márton Rózsa Byzantine Second-Tier Élite In

    Doctoral Dissertation Márton Rózsa Byzantine Second-Tier Élite In

    Eötvös Loránd University Faculty of Humanities DOCTORAL DISSERTATION MÁRTON RÓZSA BYZANTINE SECOND-TIER ÉLITE IN THE ‘LONG’ TWELFTH CENTURY Doctoral School of History Head of the doctoral school: Dr. Gábor Erdődy Doctoral Programme of Medieval and Early Modern World History Head of the doctoral programme: Dr. Balázs Nagy Supervisor: Dr. Balázs Nagy Members of the assessment committee: Dr. István Draskóczy, Chair Dr. Gábor Thoroczkay, PhD, Secretary Dr. Floris Bernard, opponent Dr. Andreas Rhoby, opponent Dr. István Baán, member Dr. László Horváth, PhD, member Budapest, 2019 ADATLAP a d o kt ori ért e k e z é s n yit v á n o s s á gr a h a z at al á h o z l. A d o kt ori ért e k e z é s a d at ai A s z et z ő n e v e: Ró z s a ] u í árt o n MT M'f-azonosító: 1 0 0 1 9 2 7 0 A d o kt ori ért e k e z é s c í m e é s al c í m e: B y z a nti n e Second-Tie, Éttt ein t h e 'Lang'Tu,e\th C e nt ur y f) Ol-azonosító: 1 íl. l 5 1 7 6/ E L T E. 2 0 I 9. 0 5 ő A d o kt ori i s k ol a n e v e: Tü,t énele míuclo mányi D ol ú ori { sl ail a A d o kt ori pr o gr í } m n e v e: Köz é p k ori é s kora újkori e gt e í e m e s tört é n eti Doktori Progratn A t é mavezető n e v e ó s tudo mányos fcrkozata: § a g y * B ai ú z s.
  • Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger – the First One Not to Become a Blind Man? Political and Military History of the Bryennios Family in the 11Th and Early 12Th Century

    Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger – the First One Not to Become a Blind Man? Political and Military History of the Bryennios Family in the 11Th and Early 12Th Century

    Studia Ceranea 10, 2020, p. 31–45 ISSN: 2084-140X DOI: 10.18778/2084-140X.10.02 e-ISSN: 2449-8378 Marcin Böhm (Opole) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5393-3176 Nikephoros Bryennios the Younger – the First One Not to Become a Blind Man? Political and Military History of the Bryennios Family in the 11th and Early 12th Century ikephoros Bryennios the Younger (1062–1137) has a place in the history N of the Byzantine Empire as a historian and husband of Anna Komnene (1083–1153), a woman from the imperial family. His historical work on the his- tory of the Komnenian dynasty in the 11th century is an extremely valuable source of information about the policies of the empire’s major families, whose main goal was to seize power in Constantinople1. Nikephoros was also a talented commander, which he proved by serving his father-in-law Alexios I Komnenos (1081–1118) and brother-in-law John II Komnenos (1118–1143). The marriage gave him free access to people and documents which he also enriched with the history of his own family. It happened because Nikephoros Bryennios was not the first representative of his family who played an important role in the internal policy of the empire. He had two predecessors, his grandfather, and great grand- father, who according to the family tradition had the same name as our hero. They 1 J. Seger, Byzantinische Historiker des zehnten und elften Jahrhunderts, vol. I, Nikephoros Bryennios, München 1888, p. 31–33; W. Treadgold, The Middle Byzantine Historians, Basingstoke 2013, p. 344–345; A.
  • Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century

    Byzantine Conquests in the East in the 10 Century

    th Byzantine conquests in the East in the 10 century Campaigns of Nikephoros II Phocas and John Tzimiskes as were seen in the Byzantine sources Master thesis Filip Schneider s1006649 15. 6. 2018 Eternal Rome Supervisor: Prof. dr. Maaike van Berkel Master's programme in History Radboud Univerity Front page: Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas entering Constantinople in 963, an illustration from the Madrid Skylitzes. The illuminated manuscript of the work of John Skylitzes was created in the 12th century Sicily. Today it is located in the National Library of Spain in Madrid. Table of contents Introduction 5 Chapter 1 - Byzantine-Arab relations until 963 7 Byzantine-Arab relations in the pre-Islamic era 7 The advance of Islam 8 The Abbasid Caliphate 9 Byzantine Empire under the Macedonian dynasty 10 The development of Byzantine Empire under Macedonian dynasty 11 The land aristocracy 12 The Muslim world in the 9th and 10th century 14 The Hamdamids 15 The Fatimid Caliphate 16 Chapter 2 - Historiography 17 Leo the Deacon 18 Historiography in the Macedonian period 18 Leo the Deacon - biography 19 The History 21 John Skylitzes 24 11th century Byzantium 24 Historiography after Basil II 25 John Skylitzes - biography 26 Synopsis of Histories 27 Chapter 3 - Nikephoros II Phocas 29 Domestikos Nikephoros Phocas and the conquest of Crete 29 Conquest of Aleppo 31 Emperor Nikephoros II Phocas and conquest of Cilicia 33 Conquest of Cyprus 34 Bulgarian question 36 Campaign in Syria 37 Conquest of Antioch 39 Conclusion 40 Chapter 4 - John Tzimiskes 42 Bulgarian problem 42 Campaign in the East 43 A Crusade in the Holy Land? 45 The reasons behind Tzimiskes' eastern campaign 47 Conclusion 49 Conclusion 49 Bibliography 51 Introduction In the 10th century, the Byzantine Empire was ruled by emperors coming from the Macedonian dynasty.
  • Conversion of Kariye Museum to Mosque in Turkey

    Conversion of Kariye Museum to Mosque in Turkey

    Conversion of Kariye Museum to Mosque in Turkey August 24, 2020 A month after turning the iconic Hagia Sophia museum, originally a cathedral, into a mosque, Turkey’s government has decided to convert another Byzantine monument in Istanbul, which has been a museum for over 70 years, into a working mosque. Late last year, the Council of State, the highest administrative court in Turkey, had removed legal hurdles for the Chora (Kariye) museum’s reconversion into a mosque. President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, whose Islamist AK Party has long called for the reconversion of the Ottoman-era mosques that were secularised by Kemalists, signed a decree, transferring the management of the medieval monument to the Directorate of Islamic Affairs. Kariye Museum Originally built in the early 4th century as a chapel outside the city walls of Constantinople built by Constantine the Great, the Chora Church was one of the oldest religious monuments of the Byzantine era and of eastern Orthodox Christianity. It’s believed that the land where the chapel was built was the burial site of Babylas of Antioch, a saint of Eastern Christians, and his disciples. Emperor Justinian I, who built Hagia Sophia during 532-537, reconstructed Chora after the chapel had been ruined by an earthquake. Since then, it has been rebuilt many times. Today’s structure is considered to be at least 1,000 years old. Maria Doukaina, the mother-in-law of Emperor Alexios Komnenos I, launched a renovation project in the 11th century. She rebuilt Chora into the shape of a quincunx, five circles arranged in a cross which was considered a holy shape during the Byzantine era.
  • On the Application of Byzantine Law in Modern Bessarabia А

    On the Application of Byzantine Law in Modern Bessarabia А

    2021 ВЕСТНИК САНКТ-ПЕТЕРБУРГСКОГО УНИВЕРСИТЕТА Т. 12. Вып. 1 ПРАВО ПРАВОВАЯ ЖИЗНЬ: НАУЧНО-ПРАКТИЧЕСКИЕ ЗАКЛЮЧЕНИЯ, КОММЕНТАРИИ И ОБЗОРЫ UDC 340.154:34.01 On the application of Byzantine law in modern Bessarabia А. D. Rudokvas, A. A. Novikov St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russian Federation For citation: Rudokvas, Anton D., Andrej A. Novikov. 2021. “On the application of Byzantine law in modern Bessarabia”. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. Law 1: 205–223. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2021.114 The article describes the application of Byzantine law in the region of Bessarabia which formed part of the Russian Empire from the early 19th century until 1917. The empire allowed the lo- cal population to apply their local laws for the regulation of their civil law relations. Due to historical reasons, these local laws were identified with the law of the Byzantine Empire which had already disappeared in 1453. The authors of the article provide a general description of the sources of Bessarabian law and then turn to case study research regarding the jurispru- dence of courts on the issues of the Law of Succession in Bessarabia. They demonstrate that in interpreting the provisions of the law applicable, Russian lawyers often referred to Roman law as a doctrinal background of Byzantine law. Furthermore, they did not hesitate to identify Roman law with Pandect law. Even though the doctrine of the Law of Pandects had been cre- ated in Germany on the basis of Roman law texts, it was far from the content of the original law of the Ancient Roman Empire.
  • The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi

    The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi

    The Byzantine State and the Dynatoi A struggle for supremacy 867 - 1071 J.J.P. Vrijaldenhoven S0921084 Van Speijkstraat 76-II 2518 GE ’s Gravenhage Tel.: 0628204223 E-mail: [email protected] Master Thesis Europe 1000 - 1800 Prof. Dr. P. Stephenson and Prof. Dr. P.C.M. Hoppenbrouwers History University of Leiden 30-07-2014 CONTENTS GLOSSARY 2 INTRODUCTION 6 CHAPTER 1 THE FIRST STRUGGLE OF THE DYNATOI AND THE STATE 867 – 959 16 STATE 18 Novel (A) of Leo VI 894 – 912 18 Novels (B and C) of Romanos I Lekapenos 922/928 and 934 19 Novels (D, E and G) of Constantine VII Porphyrogenetos 947 - 959 22 CHURCH 24 ARISTOCRACY 27 CONCLUSION 30 CHAPTER 2 LAND OWNERSHIP IN THE PERIOD OF THE WARRIOR EMPERORS 959 - 1025 32 STATE 34 Novel (F) of Romanos II 959 – 963. 34 Novels (H, J, K, L and M) of Nikephoros II Phokas 963 – 969. 34 Novels (N and O) of Basil II 988 – 996 37 CHURCH 42 ARISTOCRACY 45 CONCLUSION 49 CHAPTER 3 THE CHANGING STATE AND THE DYNATOI 1025 – 1071 51 STATE 53 CHURCH 60 ARISTOCRACY 64 Land register of Thebes 65 CONCLUSION 68 CONCLUSION 70 APPENDIX I BYZANTINE EMPERORS 867 - 1081 76 APPENDIX II MAPS 77 BIBLIOGRAPHY 82 1 Glossary Aerikon A judicial fine later changed into a cash payment. Allelengyon Collective responsibility of a tax unit to pay each other’s taxes. Anagraphis / Anagrapheus Fiscal official, or imperial tax assessor, who held a role similar as the epoptes. Their major function was the revision of the tax cadastre. It is implied that they measured land and on imperial order could confiscate lands.
  • Anna Komnene's Narrative of the War Against The

    Anna Komnene's Narrative of the War Against The

    GRAECO-LATINA BRUNENSIA 19, 2014, 2 MAREK MEŠKO (MASARYK UNIVERSITY, BRNO) ANNA KOMNENE’S NARRATIVE OF THE WAR AGAINST THE SCYTHIANS* The Alexiad by Anna Komnene is well-known. At times it raises controversial issues (e.g. concerning “full” authorship of the Byzantine princess), but all in all it represents a very valuable source of information. In this paper the author strives to examine just how precise and valuable the pieces of information she gives us in connection with the war of her father emperor Alexios Komnenos (1081–1118) against the Scythians (the Pechenegs) are. He also mentions chronological issues which at times are able to “darken” the course of events and render their putting back into the right context difficult. There are many inconsistencies of this type in Anna Komnene’s narrative and for these reasons it is important to reestablish clear chronological order of events. Finally the author presents a concise description of the war against the Pechenegs based on the findings in the previous parts of his paper. Key words: Byzantium, Pechenegs, medieval, nomads, Alexiad, warfare The Alexiad by Anna Komnene1 is well-known to most of the Byzan- tine history scholars. At times it raised controversial issues (e.g. concerning “full” or “partial” authorship of the Byzantine princess),2 but all in all it represents a valuable written source. Regardless of these issues most of the scholars involved agree that it will always remain a unique piece, a special case, of Byzantine literature,3 despite the obvious fact that Anna Komnene’s * This work was supported by the Program of „Employment of Newly Graduated Doc- tors of Science for Scientific Excellence“ (grant number CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0009) co-financed from European Social Fund and the state budget of the Czech Republic.
  • Istanbul, Not Constantinople: a Global City in Context

    Istanbul, Not Constantinople: a Global City in Context

    Istanbul, Not Constantinople: A Global City in Context ASH 3931 Section 8ES5 / EUH 3931 Section 8ES5 / EUS 3930 Section 19ES Monday, Wednesday, Friday periods 5 Virtual office hours T R 1-3pm University of Florida Fall 2020 Course Description This is a course about why Istanbul is a global city and how it remains to be one. This particular city makes a central node in all the five utilities of global flow – defined by theorist Arjun Appadurai as ethnoscapes, technoscapes, financescapes, mediascapes, and ideoscapes. In this course, we take a multidisciplinary, transhistorical look at the city in three parts: 1) Pre-modern political, religious, commercial, and military exchanges that reflected and shaped the city landscape, 2) Modern cultural norms, natural disasters, and republican formations that caused the city to shrink on a logical and dramatic scale, and, 3) Artists, athletes, politicians, and soldiers that claimed the space in the city. Overlapping and standing alone at times, the topics to be explored likewise relate to various topics, including authority, civic nationalism, gender, migration, poverty, public health, and religion all in traditional and national, global and local ways. Beside others, students interested in European Studies, International Studies, Religious Studies, and Middle Eastern Studies are welcome and encouraged to join this survey course. Sophomore standing or the instructor’s approval is a prerequisite. Course Objectives By the end of the course, you should be able to: - Recognize and analyze the significance of Istanbul in discussions about geography, history, culture, politics, and sociology, - Present an informed understanding of global cities in comparative context, - Discuss specific developments that correlate Istanbul to political, social, economic, and other developments in the larger world, and, - Reconsider the nuanced dynamics that created and transformed Istanbul across time.
  • The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) and the Western Way of War the Komnenian Armies

    The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) and the Western Way of War the Komnenian Armies

    Anistoriton Journal, vol. 11 (2008-2009) Viewpoints 1 The Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantium) and the Western Way of War The Komnenian Armies Byzantium. The word invokes to the modern imagination images of icons, palaces and peaceful Christianity rather than the militarism associated with its European counterparts during the age of the Byzantine Empire. Despite modern interpretations of the Empire, it was not without military dynamism throughout its 800-year hold on the East. During the “Second Golden Age” of Byzantium, this dominion experienced a level of strength and discipline in its army that was rarely countered before or after. This was largely due to the interest of the Komnenian emperors in creating a military culture and integrating foreign ideas into the Eastern Roman Empire. The Byzantine Empire faced unique challenges not only because of the era in which they were a major world power but also for the geography of Byzantium. Like the Rome of earlier eras, the territory encompassed by Byzantium was broad in scope and encompassed a variety of peoples under one banner. There were two basic areas held by the empire – the Haemus and Anatolia, with outposts in Crete, the Crimea and southern Italy and Sicily (Willmott 4). By the time of the Komnenos dynasty, most of Anatolia had been lost in the battle of Manzikert. Manuel I would attempt to remedy that loss, considered significant to the control of the empire. Of this territory, the majority was arid or mountainous, creating difficulties for what was primarily an agricultural economy. This reliance on land-based products helped to bolster the reluctance for war in the eastern Roman Empire.
  • Lamentation, History, and Female Authorship in Anna Komnene’S Alexiad Leonora Neville

    Lamentation, History, and Female Authorship in Anna Komnene’S Alexiad Leonora Neville

    Lamentation, History, and Female Authorship in Anna Komnene’s Alexiad Leonora Neville NE OF THE MOST commonly read and widely available Byzantine histories is the Alexiad, a history of the em- Operor Alexios Komnenos, who ruled 1081–1118, by his daughter Anna Komnene (1083–1153). Anna’s first-hand descriptions of the passage of the First Crusade are frequently excerpted as expressing a paradigmatic ‘Byzantine view’ of the crusades. Although it is perhaps the most frequently read medieval Byzantine text, it is far from typical of Byzantine histories. Anna’s work is invariably called a history and she de- scribes herself explicitly as writing a history. Yet in its title, Alexiad, and frequent Homeric vocabulary and imagery, it brings the archaic epics to mind.1 The characterization of Alexios as a wily sea captain steering the empire through con- stant storms with guile and courage strongly recalls Odysseus.2 Both in its epic cast and in other factors discussed below, Anna did not adhere strictly to the rules of writing history and rather seems to have played with the boundaries of the genre. The 1 A. Dyck, “Iliad and Alexiad: Anna Comnena’s Homeric Reminiscences,” GRBS 27 (1985) 113–120. Anna’s husband, Nikephoros Bryennios, wrote a history of the rise of Alexios Komnenos in which Alexios ends up seeming less heroic than his political enemy Nikephoros Bryennios the elder (the author’s grandfather). At the point where Alexios has defeated Bryennios the elder, Nikephoros says that “another Iliad would be needed” to tell the deeds of his grandfather properly.
  • Iliad and Alexiad: Anna Comnena's Homeric Reminiscences Andrew R

    Iliad and Alexiad: Anna Comnena's Homeric Reminiscences Andrew R

    DYCK, ANDREW R., "Iliad" and "Alexiad": Anna Comnena's Homeric Reminiscences , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:1 (1986:Spring) p.113 Iliad and Alexiad: Anna Comnena's Homeric Reminiscences Andrew R. Dyck HEN SCLERAENA, mistress of Constantine IX (regn. A.D. W 1042-1055), first entered the palace, one of the courtiers was heard to mutter ov lIE/J-EUIl;, an allusion to the comment of the Trojan elders when Helen mounted to their city's tower (II. 3.156f): ov lIE/J-EUtS TpWa~ Kat EVKlIT,f.U8a~ 'Axaw~ TOI:fi8' aJJ4X YVllal.Kt 7TOA:VlI XP01l01l aA'YEa 7TaUXEl.lI. Alas, the recipient of the compliment had to inquire as to its meaning. And no wonder: women of whatever position were not normally vouchsafed a classical educa­ tion in Byzantium. Even Styliane, the daughter of Michael Psellus (who retails this anecdote), had to begin her literary studies not with Homer, as a boy would, but with the Psalms.l Far different the case of Anna Comnena, whose Homeric learning is on display throughout her Alexiad. Yet if her confidant George Torni­ ces can be trusted, even she had to begin her studies of profane litera­ ture covertly, in the hours reserved for rest and sleep.2 Even the rare woman who ventured to break into the male realm of profane letters was by no means sure of receiving a fair hearing: consider the case of the woman who wrote a set of elementary grammatical notes (UXE8'YJ) for school instruction and received from John Tzetzes the ungallant advice to return to the spindle and distaff.3 Anna's, however, was an unusual ambition that bore fruit in an uncommon achievement.
  • Byzantine Critiques of Monasticism in the Twelfth Century

    Byzantine Critiques of Monasticism in the Twelfth Century

    A “Truly Unmonastic Way of Life”: Byzantine Critiques of Monasticism in the Twelfth Century DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Hannah Elizabeth Ewing Graduate Program in History The Ohio State University 2014 Dissertation Committee: Professor Timothy Gregory, Advisor Professor Anthony Kaldellis Professor Alison I. Beach Copyright by Hannah Elizabeth Ewing 2014 Abstract This dissertation examines twelfth-century Byzantine writings on monasticism and holy men to illuminate monastic critiques during this period. Drawing upon close readings of texts from a range of twelfth-century voices, it processes both highly biased literary evidence and the limited documentary evidence from the period. In contextualizing the complaints about monks and reforms suggested for monasticism, as found in the writings of the intellectual and administrative elites of the empire, both secular and ecclesiastical, this study shows how monasticism did not fit so well in the world of twelfth-century Byzantium as it did with that of the preceding centuries. This was largely on account of developments in the role and operation of the church and the rise of alternative cultural models that were more critical of traditional ascetic sanctity. This project demonstrates the extent to which twelfth-century Byzantine society and culture had changed since the monastic heyday of the tenth century and contributes toward a deeper understanding of Byzantine monasticism in an under-researched period of the institution. ii Dedication This dissertation is dedicated to my family, and most especially to my parents. iii Acknowledgments This dissertation is indebted to the assistance, advice, and support given by Anthony Kaldellis, Tim Gregory, and Alison Beach.