DOCSLIB.ORG

Bibliography Primary Sources Abbadie, Jacques

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Bibliography Primary Sources Abbadie, Jacques On the Spirit of Rights Dan Edelstein Published by the University of Chicago Press, 2018 Bibliography Primary Sources Abbadie, Jacques. Défense de la nation britannique, ou Les droits de Dieu, de la Nature, & de la Société clairement établis au sujet de la révolution d’Angleterre. The Hague, 1693. ———. Les Droits de Dieu, de la nature et des gens, tirés d’un livre de M. Abbadie intitulé: “Défense de la nation britannique . .” On y a ajouté un discours de M. Noodt sur les droits des souverains (traduit du latin par Barbeyrac). Amsterdam, 1775. ———. Traité de la vérité de la religion chretienne. Rotterdam: R. Leers, 1684. Académie française. Dictionnaire. Paris, 1694. ———. Dictionnaire. Paris, 1762. ———. Dictionnaire. Paris, 1798. Acta Sanctae Sedis. 41 vols. Rome, 1865–1908. http://www.vatican.va/archive/ass/index_en.htm. Adams, John. The Works of John Adams. 10 vols. Edited by Charles Francis Adams. Boston: Little, Brown, 1856. Adams, John, Samuel Adams, and James Warren. Warren-Adams Letters. Boston: Massachusetts Historical Society, 1917. Addison, Joseph. The Evidences of the Christian Religion. London: Tonson, 1733. ———. The Free-holder, Or Political Essays. London: D. Midwinter, 1716. All Canada in the Hands of the English. Boston: B. Mecom, 1760. Almain, Jacques. “A Book Concerning the Authority of the Church.” In Conciliarism and Papalism, edited by J. H. Burns and Thomas M. Izbicki, 134–200. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. Alsop, Vincent. A Reply to the Reverend Dean of St. Pauls’s Reflections on the Rector of Sutton, 1 &c. London, 1681. Annet, Peter. A Discourse on Government and Religion. Boston: Daniel Fowle, 1750. Appleton, Nathaniel. The Origin of War Examin’d and Applied, in a Sermon... Boston: T. Fleet, 1733. Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. ———. Treatise on Law. Translated by Richard J. Reagan. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2000. Archives parlementaires de 1787 à 1860. Edited by M. J. Mavidal et al. Paris: P. Dupont, 1862. Argentina [United Provinces of South America]. Constitución de las Provincias Unidas de Sudamérica. 1819. https://es.wikisource.org/wiki/Constituci%C3%B3n_de_la_Naci%C3%B3n_Argentina_ (1819). Aristotle. The Art of Rhetoric. Translated by H. C. Lawson-Tancred. London: Penguin, 1991. Atwood, William. The Fundamental Constitution of the English Government Proving King William and Queen Mary Our Lawful and Rightful King and Queen. London, 1690. B., A. Some Remarks upon Government. London, 1689. Bancroft, Edward. Remarks on the Review of the Controversy between Great Britain and Her Colonies. New London, CT, 1769. Barnard, John. The Throne Established by Righteousness. A Sermon Preach’d Before His Excellency Jonathan Belcher. Boston, 1734. Barret, John. The Rector of Sutton Committed with the Dean of St. Paul’s. London, 1680. Baudeau, Nicholas, ed. Ephémérides du citoyen, ou Bibliothèque raisonnée des sciences morales et politiques. Paris: N. A. Delalain, 1768. Bayle, Pierre. Avis aux réfugiés, Réponse d’un nouveau converti. Edited by Gianluca Mori. Paris: Honoré Champion, 2007. ———. Avis important aux refugiez sur leur prochain retour en France. Paris: Gabriel Martin, 1692. ———. Œuvres diverses. The Hague: P. Husson, 1727. Bethel, Slingsby. The Providences of God, Observed Through Several Ages, Towards this Nation. London: R. Baldwin, 1691. Béthune, Philippe de. Le conseiller d’estat ou Recueil des plus générales considérations servant au maniment des affaires publiques. 1633; Paris: Compagnie des libraires du Palais, 2 1665. Bèze, Théodore de. Du droit des magistrats sur leurs subjets: traité tres necessaire en ce temps pour advertir de leur devoir, tant les magistrats que les subjets. 1575; Paris: EDHIS, 1977. Blackstone, William. An Analysis of the Laws of England. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1756. ———. Commentaries on the Laws of England. 4 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1765. Bland, Richard. An Inquiry into the Rights of the British Colonies. Williamsburg, Va.: Alexander Purdie, 1766. Bodin, Jean. On Sovereignty. Edited and translated by Julian H. Franklin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. Boisguilbert, Pierre le Pesant de. Le Détail de la France sous le règne présent. 2nd ed. 1707. Bolívar, Simón. El Libertador: Writings of Simón Bolívar. Translated by Frederick H. Fornoff. Edited by David Bushnell. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Bonald, Louis Gabriel Ambroise de. Législation primitive. Paris: chez Le Clere, 1802. Boucher, Jean [François de Vérone Constantin]. Apologie pour Iehan Chastel Parisien, execute a mort, et pour les peres & escholliers, de la Societé de Iesus, bannis du Royaume de France. 1595. Boulainvilliers, Henri de. Etat de la France. London: Palmer, 1727. Bouquier, Gabriel, and Pierre-Louis Moline. La Réunion du dix août, ou L’inauguration de la république française. Paris: chez R. Vatar, an II [1793?]. Boyer d’Argens, Jean-Baptiste. Lettres juives. 6 vols. La Haye: P. Gautier, 1736–37. Boyle, Robert. The Philosophical Works of The Honourable Robert Boyle. 3 vols. London: Innys, 1725. Branch, H. N., ed. and trans. The Mexican Constitution of 1917 Compared with the Constitution of 1857. Philadelphia: American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1917. Brueil, Jean Tronchin du. Lettres sur les matières du temps, 3 année. Amsterdam, 1690. Burke, Edmund. Revolutionary Writings. Edited by Iain Hampsher-Monk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. ———. The Works of the Right Honourable Edmund Burke. London: Dodsley, 1792. Burlamaqui, Jean-Jacques. Principes du droit naturel. Geneva, 1747. ———. Principes du droit politique. Amsterdam, 1751. 3 ———. The Principles of Natural and Politic Law. Translated by Thomas Nugent. Edited by Peter Korkman. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2006. Carmichael, Gershom. Natural Rights on the Threshold of the Scottish Enlightenment: The Writings of Gershom Carmichael. Edited by James Moore and Michael Silverthorne. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2002. Cassin, René. Hommage à Boris Mirkine-Guetzévitch. New York: Ecole Libre des Hautes Etudes, n.d. ———. “Looking Back on the Universal Declaration of 1948.” Review of Contemporary Law, no. 1 (1968): 13–26. Chauncy, Charles. Civil Magistrates Must be Just, Ruling in the Fear of God. Boston, 1747. Cicero. De finibus. Translated by H. Harris Rackham. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Loeb, 1931. ———. De legibus. Translated by Clinton Walker Keyes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press/Loeb, 1928. ———. Les Offices de Cicéron, traduits en françois sur la nouvelle édition latine de Graevius . Translated and edited by Philippe Goibaud-Dubois. Paris: J.-B. Coignard, 1691. Claude, Jean. Les Œuvres posthumes de Mr. Claude. 5 vols. Amsterdam, 1688. ———. Les Plaintes des protestants cruellement opprimés dans le royaume de France. 1686; Paris: Fischenbacher, 1885. Condorcet, Nicolas de. “Eloge de M. Cassini de Thury.” In Histoire de l’Académie royale des sciences . Paris: Imprimerie Royale, 1784. ———. Essai sur la Constitution et les fonctions des Assemblées provinciales. 1788. ———. Influence de la révolution de l’Amérique sur les opinions et la législation de l’Europe. 1788. ———. Lettres d’un citoyen des États-Unis à un Français, sur les affaires présentes. 1788. ———. Lettres sur le commerce des grains. Paris: chez Couturier père, 1774. ———. Œuvres de Condorcet. 12 vols. Edited by Arthur Condorcet O’Connor and François Arago. Paris: Firmin Didot, 1847. ———. Réflexions sur le commerce des bleds. London, 1776. ———. Réflexions sur l’esclavage des nègres. Neufchâtel: Société typographique, 1781. 4 ———. “Sur l’admission des femmes au droit de cité.” Journal de la Société de 1789, July 3, 1790. Cooper, Samuel. The Crisis. Boston, 1754. Coquereau, Jean-Baptiste-Louis. Mémoires de l’abbé Terrai . [Paris?]: A la Chancellerie, 1776. Craufurd, James. A Serious Expostulation with that Party in Scotland, Commonly Known by the Name of Whigs, Wherein is Modestly and Plainly Laid Open the Inconsistency of their Practices. London: Richard Chiswell, 1682. Cumberland, Richard. Traité philosophique des loix naturelles. Translated by Jean Barbeyrac. Amsterdam: chez Pierre Mortier, 1744. ———. A Treatise of the Laws of Nature. Translated by John Maxwell. Edited by Jon Parkin. 1727; Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005. Dallington, Robert. The View of Fraunce. London: Symon Stafford, 1604. D’Aubigné, Agrippa. Histoire universelle: Comprise en trois tomes. Amsterdam, 1626. Davenant, Charles. An Essay upon the Probable Methods of Making a People Gainers in the Ballance of Trade. London: James Knapton..., 1699. Defoe, Daniel. Four Letters to a Friend in North Britain. London, 1710. ———. Jure Divino. London, 1706. ———. A Letter to a Member of Parliament. London, 1699. De la Court, Pieter. Memoires de Jean de Wit, Grand Pensionnaire de Hollande. Translated by Johanna Dorotheâ von Lindener Zoutelandt. Ratisbonne: Erase Kinkius, 1709. Delisle de Sales, Jean-Baptiste-Claude. De la philosophie de la nature. Amsterdam, 1770. Descartes, René. Discours de la méthode. 1637; Paris: Gallimard, 1991. ———. Le Monde ou traité de la lumière. 1633; ARTFL Electronic Edition, 2009. ———. Principes de la philosophie. 1644; ARTFL Electronic Edition, 2009. ———. Principles of Philosophy. Translated and edited by Valentine Rodger Miller and Reese P. Miller. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1982. D’Holbach, Paul-Henri Thiry. La politique naturelle, ou Discours sur les vrais principes du gouvernement. London, 1773. ———. Systême de la nature, ou des loix du monde physique & du monde moral. London [Amsterdam], 1770. 5 ———. Système
Load more

Recommended publications
  • New Working Papers Series, Entitled “Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics”
    Working Papers in Technology Governance and Economic Dynamics no. 74 the other canon foundation, Norway Tallinn University of Technology, Tallinn Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance CONTACT: Rainer Kattel, [email protected]; Wolfgang Drechsler, [email protected]; Erik S. Reinert, [email protected] 80 Economic Bestsellers before 1850: A Fresh Look at the History of Economic Thought Erik S. Reinert, Kenneth Carpenter, Fernanda A. Reinert, Sophus A. Reinert* MAY 2017 * E. Reinert, Tallinn University of Technology & The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; K. Car- penter, former librarian, Harvard University; F. Reinert, The Other Canon Foundation, Norway; S. Reinert, Harvard Business School. The authors are grateful to Dr. Debra Wallace, Managing Director, Baker Library Services and, Laura Linard, Director of Baker Library Special Collections, at Harvard Business School, where the Historical Collection now houses what was once the Kress Library, for their cooperation in this venture. Above all our thanks go to Olga Mikheeva at Tallinn University of Technology for her very efficient research assistance. Antiquarian book dealers often have more information on economics books than do academics, and our thanks go to Wilhelm Hohmann in Stuttgart, Robert H. Rubin in Brookline MA, Elvira Tasbach in Berlin, and, above all, to Ian Smith in London. We are also grateful for advice from Richard van den Berg, Francesco Boldizzoni, Patrick O’Brien, Alexandre Mendes Cunha, Bertram Schefold and Arild Sæther. Corresponding author [email protected] The core and backbone of this publication consists of the meticulous work of Kenneth Carpenter, librarian of the Kress Library at Harvard Busi- ness School starting in 1968 and later Assistant Director for Research Resources in the Harvard University Library and the Harvard College 1 Library.
    [Show full text]
  • Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 Through 2009
    Works on Giambattista Vico in English from 1884 through 2009 COMPILED BY MOLLY BLA C K VERENE TABLE OF CON T EN T S PART I. Books A. Monographs . .84 B. Collected Volumes . 98 C. Dissertations and Theses . 111 D. Journals......................................116 PART II. Essays A. Articles, Chapters, et cetera . 120 B. Entries in Reference Works . 177 C. Reviews and Abstracts of Works in Other Languages ..180 PART III. Translations A. English Translations ............................186 B. Reviews of Translations in Other Languages.........192 PART IV. Citations...................................195 APPENDIX. Bibliographies . .302 83 84 NEW VICO STUDIE S 27 (2009) PART I. BOOKS A. Monographs Adams, Henry Packwood. The Life and Writings of Giambattista Vico. London: Allen and Unwin, 1935; reprinted New York: Russell and Russell, 1970. REV I EWS : Gianturco, Elio. Italica 13 (1936): 132. Jessop, T. E. Philosophy 11 (1936): 216–18. Albano, Maeve Edith. Vico and Providence. Emory Vico Studies no. 1. Series ed. D. P. Verene. New York: Peter Lang, 1986. REV I EWS : Daniel, Stephen H. The Eighteenth Century: A Current Bibliography, n.s. 12 (1986): 148–49. Munzel, G. F. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 173–75. Simon, L. Canadian Philosophical Reviews 8 (1988): 335–37. Avis, Paul. The Foundations of Modern Historical Thought: From Machiavelli to Vico. Beckenham (London): Croom Helm, 1986. REV I EWS : Goldie, M. History 72 (1987): 84–85. Haddock, Bruce A. New Vico Studies 5 (1987): 185–86. Bedani, Gino L. C. Vico Revisited: Orthodoxy, Naturalism and Science in the ‘Scienza nuova.’ Oxford: Berg, 1989. REV I EWS : Costa, Gustavo. New Vico Studies 8 (1990): 90–92.
    [Show full text]
  • Network Map of Knowledge And
    Humphry Davy George Grosz Patrick Galvin August Wilhelm von Hofmann Mervyn Gotsman Peter Blake Willa Cather Norman Vincent Peale Hans Holbein the Elder David Bomberg Hans Lewy Mark Ryden Juan Gris Ian Stevenson Charles Coleman (English painter) Mauritz de Haas David Drake Donald E. Westlake John Morton Blum Yehuda Amichai Stephen Smale Bernd and Hilla Becher Vitsentzos Kornaros Maxfield Parrish L. Sprague de Camp Derek Jarman Baron Carl von Rokitansky John LaFarge Richard Francis Burton Jamie Hewlett George Sterling Sergei Winogradsky Federico Halbherr Jean-Léon Gérôme William M. Bass Roy Lichtenstein Jacob Isaakszoon van Ruisdael Tony Cliff Julia Margaret Cameron Arnold Sommerfeld Adrian Willaert Olga Arsenievna Oleinik LeMoine Fitzgerald Christian Krohg Wilfred Thesiger Jean-Joseph Benjamin-Constant Eva Hesse `Abd Allah ibn `Abbas Him Mark Lai Clark Ashton Smith Clint Eastwood Therkel Mathiassen Bettie Page Frank DuMond Peter Whittle Salvador Espriu Gaetano Fichera William Cubley Jean Tinguely Amado Nervo Sarat Chandra Chattopadhyay Ferdinand Hodler Françoise Sagan Dave Meltzer Anton Julius Carlson Bela Cikoš Sesija John Cleese Kan Nyunt Charlotte Lamb Benjamin Silliman Howard Hendricks Jim Russell (cartoonist) Kate Chopin Gary Becker Harvey Kurtzman Michel Tapié John C. Maxwell Stan Pitt Henry Lawson Gustave Boulanger Wayne Shorter Irshad Kamil Joseph Greenberg Dungeons & Dragons Serbian epic poetry Adrian Ludwig Richter Eliseu Visconti Albert Maignan Syed Nazeer Husain Hakushu Kitahara Lim Cheng Hoe David Brin Bernard Ogilvie Dodge Star Wars Karel Capek Hudson River School Alfred Hitchcock Vladimir Colin Robert Kroetsch Shah Abdul Latif Bhittai Stephen Sondheim Robert Ludlum Frank Frazetta Walter Tevis Sax Rohmer Rafael Sabatini Ralph Nader Manon Gropius Aristide Maillol Ed Roth Jonathan Dordick Abdur Razzaq (Professor) John W.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Supreme Principle of Morality'? in the Preface to His Best
    The Supreme Principle of Morality Allen W. Wood 1. What is ‘The Supreme Principle of Morality’? In the Preface to his best known work on moral philosophy, Kant states his purpose very clearly and succinctly: “The present groundwork is, however, nothing more than the search for and establishment of the supreme principle of morality, which already constitutes an enterprise whole in its aim and to be separated from every other moral investigation” (Groundwork 4:392). This paper will deal with the outcome of the first part of this task, namely, Kant’s attempt to formulate the supreme principle of morality, which is the intended outcome of the search. It will consider this formulation in light of Kant’s conception of the historical antecedents of his attempt. Our first task, however, must be to say a little about the meaning of the term ‘supreme principle of morality’. For it is not nearly as evident to many as it was to Kant that there is such a thing at all. And it is extremely common for people, whatever position they may take on this issue, to misunderstand what a ‘supreme principle of morality’ is, what it is for, and what role it is supposed to play in moral theorizing and moral reasoning. Kant never directly presents any argument that there must be such a principle, but he does articulate several considerations that would seem to justify supposing that there is. Kant holds that moral questions are to be decided by reason. Reason, according to Kant, always seeks unity under principles, and ultimately, systematic unity under the fewest possible number of principles (Pure Reason A298-302/B355-359, A645- 650/B673-678).
    [Show full text]
  • After Robespierre
    J . After Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION Mter Robespierre THE THERMIDORIAN REACTION By ALBERT MATHIEZ Translated from the French by Catherine Alison Phillips The Universal Library GROSSET & DUNLAP NEW YORK COPYRIGHT ©1931 BY ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED AS La Reaction Thermidorienne COPYRIGHT 1929 BY MAX LECLERC ET CIE UNIVERSAL LIBRARY EDITION, 1965 BY ARRANGEMENT WITH ALFRED A. KNOPF, INC. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOG CARD NUMBER: 65·14385 PRINTED IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PREFACE So far as order of time is concerned, M. M athie( s study of the Thermidorian Reaction, of which the present volume is a translation, is a continuation of his history of the French Revolution, of which the English version was published in 1928. In form and character, however, there is a notable difference. In the case of the earlier work the limitations imposed by the publishers excluded all references and foot-notes, and the author had to refer the reader to his other published works for the evidence on which his conclusions were based. In the case of the present book no such limitations have been set, and M. Mathiei: has thus been able not only to state his con­ clusions, but to give the chain of reasoning by which they have been reached. The Thermidorian Reaction is therefore something more than a sequel to The French Revolution, which M. Mathiei:, with perhaps undue modesty, has described as a precis having no independent authority; it is not only a work of art, but a weighty contribution to historical science. In the preface to his French Revolution M.
    [Show full text]
  • Voltaire Voltaire's Enlightenment Philosophy
    Voltaire François-Marie d'Arouet (1694–1778), better known by his pen name Voltaire, was a French writer and public activist who played a singular role in defining the eighteenth-century movement called the Enlightenment. At the center of his work was a new conception of philosophy and the philosopher that in several crucial respects influenced the modern concept of each. Yet in other ways Voltaire was not a philosopher at all in the modern sense of the term. He wrote as many plays, stories, and poems as patently philosophical tracts, and he in fact directed many of his critical writings against the philosophical pretensions of recognized philosophers such as Leibniz, Malebranche, and Descartes. He was, however, a vigorous defender of a conception of natural science that served in his mind as the antidote to vain and fruitless philosophical investigation. In clarifying this new distinction between science and philosophy, and especially in fighting vigorously for it in public campaigns directed against the perceived enemies of fanaticism and superstition, Voltaire pointed modern philosophy down several paths that it subsequently followed. To capture Voltaire's unconventional place in the history of philosophy, this article will be structured in a particular way. First, a full account of Voltaire's life is offered, not merely as background context for his philosophical work, but as an argument about the way that his particular career produced his particular contributions to European philosophy. Second, a survey of Voltaire's philosophical views is offered so as to attach the legacy of what Voltaire did with the intellectual viewpoints that his activities reinforced.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), Pp
    Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), pp. 187-215. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753%28198106%2972%3A2%3C187%3AOGAKNP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C Isis is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Mon Aug 20 10:29:37 2007 Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes By Steven Shapin* FTER TWO AND A HALF CENTURIES the Newton-Leibniz disputes A continue to inflame the passions.
    [Show full text]
  • Inventing a French Tyrant: Crisis, Propaganda, and the Origins of Fénelon’S Ideal King
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Carolina Digital Repository INVENTING A FRENCH TYRANT: CRISIS, PROPAGANDA, AND THE ORIGINS OF FÉNELON’S IDEAL KING Kirsten L. Cooper A thesis submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2013 Approved by: Jay M. Smith Chad Bryant Lloyd S. Kramer © 2013 Kirsten L. Cooper ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Kirsten L. Cooper: Inventing a French Tyrant: Crisis, Propaganda, and the Origins of Fénelon’s Ideal King (Under the direction of Jay M. Smith and Chad Bryant) In the final decades of the seventeenth century, many voices across Europe vehemently criticized Louis XIV, the most well-known coming from the pen of François Fénelon from within Versailles itself. There were, however, many other critics of varied backgrounds who participated in this common discourse of opposition. From the 1660s to the 1690s the authors of these pamphlets developed a stock of critiques of Louis XIV that eventually coalesced into a negative depiction of his entire style of government. His manner of ruling was rejected as monstrous and tyrannical. Fénelon's ideal king, a benevolent patriarch that he presents as an alternative to Louis XIV, was constructed in opposition to the image of Louis XIV developed and disseminated by these international authors. In this paper I show how all of these authors engaged in a process of borrowing, recopying, and repackaging to create a common critical discourse that had wide distribution, an extensive, transnational audience, and lasting impact for the development of changing ideals of sovereignty.
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Studies
    Berkeley Studies No. 28 (2019) Editors Stephen H. Daniel, Senior Editor College Station, Texas, USA John R. Roberts, Coordinating Editor Tallahassee, Florida, USA Silvia Parigi, Bibliographical Editor Cassino, Italy Tom Stoneham, News Editor York, UK Contents Jessica Gordon-Roth Tracing Reid’s ‘Brave Officer’ Objection Back to Berkeley—And Beyond 3 Daniel E. Flage Rickless and Passive Obedience 23 News and Announcements 47 Recent Works on Berkeley (2017-2019) 48 Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 2 © Berkeley Studies and Contributors 2019 Berkeley Studies is sponsored by Florida State University and the International Berkeley Society Berkeley Studies 28 (2019) 3 Tracing Reid’s ‘Brave Officer’ Objection Back to Berkeley—And Beyond Jessica Gordon-Roth Abstract: Berkeley’s two most obvious targets in Alciphron are Shaftesbury and Mandeville. However, as numerous commentators have pointed out, there is good reason to think Berkeley additionally targets Anthony Collins in this dialogue. In this paper, I bolster David Berman’s claim that “Collins looms large in the background” of Dialogue VII, and put some meat on the bones of Raymond Martin and John Barresi’s passing suggestion that there is a connection between the Clarke–Collins correspondence, Alciphron, and the objection that Berkeley raises regarding persons and their persistence conditions therein. Specifically, I argue that we have evidence that Berkeley’s objection to consciousness–based views of personal identity, as found in VII.8, is a response to a challenge that Collins raises to Clarke in “An Answer to Mr. Clarke’s Third Defense of his Letter to Mr. Dodwell.” This is significant not just because this objection is usually—and consistently—taken to be an objection to Locke, but also because Berkeley’s objection works against Collins’s theory of personal identity in a way that it doesn’t against Locke’s.
    [Show full text]
  • Les Mots Et Les Choses: the Obscenity of Pierre Bayle
    Les mots et les choses: the obscenity of Pierre Bayle van der Lugt, Mara Date of deposit 12/02/2019 Document version Author’s accepted manuscript Access rights © Modern Humanities Research Association 2018. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. This is the author created, accepted version manuscript following peer review and may differ slightly from the final published version. Citation for van der Lugt, M. (2018). Les mots et les choses: the obscenity of published version Pierre Bayle. Modern Language Review, 113(4), 714-741 Link to published https://doi.org/10.5699/modelangrevi.113.4.0714 version Full metadata for this item is available in St Andrews Research Repository at: https://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ LES MOTS ET LES CHOSES : THE OBSCENITY OF PIERRE BAYLE ‘Pourquoi se gêner dans un Ouvrage que l'on ne destine point aux mots, mais aux choses…?’ - Pierre Bayle, Éclaircissement sur les Obscénités. Why bother with words in a work devoted to things? asks Pierre Bayle, early modern philosopher and troublemaker extraordinaire. That is: why should the author of an historical-critical dictionary, which deals with things and acts and events, with the content of words rather than with words themselves, concern himself with such a trivial matter as the politeness of style?1 This question, of the relationship between words and things, and the responsibilities of authors using words to describe things, is at the centre of Bayle’s curious semi-provocative semi-apologetic essay or Éclaircissement sur les Obscénités. It is also part of an age-old argument attributed to the Cynics and sometimes the Stoics, which would become a locus communis for early modern discussions of obscenity.
    [Show full text]
  • Vitoria, Suárez, and Grotius: James Brown Scott’S Enduring Revival
    grotiana 41 (2020) 137-162 GROTIAN A brill.com/grot Vitoria, Suárez, and Grotius: James Brown Scott’s Enduring Revival Mark Somos Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law, Heidelberg, Germany [email protected] Joshua Smeltzer University of Cambridge, The Department of Politics and Interna- tional Studies, Cambridge, UK [email protected] Abstract This article recovers James Brown Scott’s conviction in American exceptionalism, a belief that underlay both his institutional work as well as his understanding of the ori- gins and trajectory of international law. In the first section, we discuss Scott’s interpre- tation of Hugo Grotius as part of his tactic to make US foreign affairs policies and per- spectives more compelling by presenting them as universal. In the second section, we argue that Scott’s writings on the Spanish origins of international law were in fact meant to protect Anglo-American hegemony and US influence in the Americas in the face of rapidly changing geopolitical pressures. In the final section we suggest that Scott’s US exceptionalism is reflected in his use of the United States Constitution and Supreme Court as a model for key international organizations. We conclude that Scott reframed Vitoria not to redress American bias but to enshrine it. Keywords James Brown Scott – international legal historiography – US exceptionalism – School of Salamanca © MARK SOMOS, JOSHUA SMELTZER, 2020 | doi:10.1163/18760759-04101007 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC BY-NCDownloaded 4.0 License. from Brill.com10/02/2021 07:21:28AM via free access <UN> 138 Somos and Smeltzer ‘The idea underlying this volume is that international law is part of the English common law; that as such it passed with the English colonists to America; that when, in consequence of a successful rebellion, they were admitted to the family of nations, the new republic recognized interna- tional law as completely as international law recognized the new republic’.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Happiness As the Wealth of Nations: the Rise of Political Economy in Naples in a Comparative Perspective
    Public Happiness as the Wealth of Nations: The Rise of Political Economy in Naples in a Comparative Perspective Filippo Sabetti The professed object of Dr. Adam Smith’ inquiry is the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. There is another inquiry, however, perhaps still more interesting, which he occasionally mixes with it, I mean an inquiry into the causes which affect the happiness of nations. (Malthus 1798: 303, quoted in Bruni and Porta 2005, 1) The rise of political economy in eighteenth-century Naples was as much a response to the economic conditions of the realm as it was an effort to absorb, modify, and give a hand to the scientific and human progress agitating Transalpine currents of thought. The emerging political economy in Naples stands out in part because its calls for reform and for the creation of a commercial and manufacturing society were not a radical break or rupture with the past. The recognition of the capacity of a commercial society to create wealth was accompanied by the equally important recognition that market transactions between individuals could be perceived both as mutually beneficial exchanges and as genuine social interactions that carried moral value by virtue of the social content. Whereas the Scottish Enlightenment sought to isolate market relationships from other relationships and to separate the concept of a well-governed state from the ideal of the virtuous citizen, the Neapolitan Enlightenment continued to embed the economy in social relations, arguing that good institutions could not function in the absence of good men. Individual happiness was derived from making others happy and not from the accumulation of things.
    [Show full text]