DOCSLIB.ORG

2012 Annual Report for the Virginia Unit

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2012 Annual Report for the Virginia Unit Table of Contents COMPLETED PROJECTS ............................................................................................................. 1 Paul L. Angermeier ..................................................................................................... 1 1. Habitat suitability for Roanoke logperch near Philpott Reservior (PI: Angermeier) ....... 1 2. Assessing impacts of Roanoke River Flood Reduction Project on the endangered Roanoke Logperch (PI: Angermeier) ........................................................................................ 2 3. Assessment of the distribution and abundance of Roanoke logperch (Percina rex) in the Dan River basin of Virginia (Lead PI: Roberts) ......................................................................... 3 4. Survey of the freshwater mollusk assemblages in the Little River, Virginia (Lead PI: Ostby) ...................................................................................................................................... 4 5. Status of the freshwater mussel fauna in the Powell River, Virginia and Tennessee (Lead PI: Henley) ...................................................................................................................... 5 Michael R. Vaughan .................................................................................................... 6 1. Evaluating potential effects of widening US highway 64 on red wolves, Washington, Tyrell, and Dare Counties, North Carolina. (PI: Michael Vaughan & Marcella Kelly) .............. 6 2. Evaluating potential effects of widening US highway 64 on the black bear population of Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge, Dare County, North Carolina (PI: Michael Vaughan & Marcella Kelly) ..................................................................................................................... 8 3. Multigenerational, multi species test for endocrine disrupting chemical effects (PI: Michael Vaughan & Kathy Alexander) ................................................................................... 10 4. Noninvasive tracking of jaguars (Panthera onca) and co-occurring feline species in Belize by genotyping feces and remote camera trapping (PI: Marcella Kelly & Michael Vaughan)................................................................................................................................ 11 CURRENT PROJECTS ................................................................................................................ 12 Paul L. Angermeier ................................................................................................... 12 1. Assessing post-construction impacts of the Roanoke River Flood Reduction Project on the endangered Roanoke logperch (Lead PI: Roberts) .......................................................... 12 2. Endangered fish surveys for the Virginia Department of Transportation (Lead PI: Angermeier) ........................................................................................................................... 13 3. Habitat suitability for Roanoke logperch near Philpott Reservior (Lead PI: Roberts) .. 13 4. Population ecology of variegate darter in Virginia (Lead PI: Angermeier) .................. 14 5. Spatial analysis of relations among conservation practices, aquatic ecosystem services, and human well-being in the Albemarle-Pamlico basin (Lead PI: Angermeier) .................... 15 6. Development and assessment of tools for evaluating stream fish community responses to climate change along thermal gradients (Lead PI: Angermeier) ...................................... 17 i 7. Regulating services as measures of ecological resilience on DoD lands (Lead PI: Angermeier) ........................................................................................................................... 17 8. Comparison of habitat suitability among sites supporting strong, localized, and extirpated populations of candy darters (Etheostoma osburni) (Lead PI: Dunn) .................. 18 9. Bayesian population dynamics modeling to guide population restoration and recovery of endangered mussels in the Clinch and Powell Rivers, Tennessee and Virginia (Lead PI: Jiao) ......................................................................................................................... 19 10. Biological monitoring and geomorphological characterization for the USGS Eastern Region Initiative on the Clinch (Lead PI: Ostby) ..................................................................... 20 11. An evaluation of freshwater mussel body burdens following in situ exposure to contaminants in Clinch River (Lead PI: Ostby) ....................................................................... 20 12. Stream surveys for Villosa perpurpurea and other native mussels in Beech Creek, Hawkins County, Tennessee (Lead PI: Ostby) ........................................................................ 21 13. Semi-quantitative freshwater mussel surveys in the Wards Creek, Rocky Creek, Buck Mountain Creek, and Swift Run sub-watersheds of the Rivanna River (Lead PI: Ostby) ....... 21 W. Mark Ford ............................................................................................................ 22 1. Evaluating ecological threats under climate change (Lead PI: Ford) ............................ 22 2. Effects of a hierarchal and spatially differential disruption of roosts and roost areas on non-random assorting (social) dynamic in bats using ephemeral forest conditions (Lead PI: Ford) ...................................................................................................................................... 23 3. Acoustical sampling following white-nose syndrome at Fort Drum, New York: pilot test to determine efficacious techniques to address surveillance needs (Lead PI: Ford) ............. 24 4. Assessing occupancy and detection rates for the Carolina northern flying squirrel: examination of nest-box surveys in Program Mark and Program Presence and development of acoustical survey techniques (Lead PI: Ford) ..................................................................... 25 5. White-tailed deer impact and vegetative response in the Blue Ridge, Ridge and Valley and Appalachian Plateau of Virginia in relation to landscape and land ownership characteristics (Lead PI: Ford) ............................................................................................... 27 OTHER FACULTY COOPERATORS .................................................................... 28 Sarah Karpanty and James Fraser ............................................................................. 28 1. Assessing the responses of breeding shorebirds to military jet overflights of the Core MOA at Cape Lookout National Seashore ............................................................................. 28 James Fraser, Daniel Catlin, and Sarah Karpanty ..................................................... 29 1. Missouri River piping plover population dynamics in relation to natural and artificial sandbars; least tern and piping plover response to flooding on the Missiouri River ............ 29 Fred Benefield ........................................................................................................... 30 1. Evaluation of the functional role of freshwater mussel beds in maintaining water quality and suitable habitat for fishes and endangered freshwater mussels ....................... 30 ii Jess W. Jones ............................................................................................................. 30 1. Development of demographic metrics to evaluate success of mussel reintroductions in the upper Tennessee River system......................................................................................... 30 1. Restoration of freshwater mussel populations to high priority geographic areas in the upper Tennessee River system ............................................................................................... 31 Emmanuel Frimpong ................................................................................................. 32 1. Modeling how traits mediate fish vulnerabilities to specific habitat alterations ....... 32 Carola Haas ............................................................................................................... 33 1. Restoration of Pine Flatwoods Wetlands on Eglin Air Force Base ................................. 33 William F. Henley ..................................................................................................... 34 1. Histological evaluations of organ tissues of Pheasantshells (Actinonaias pectorosa) from Horton Ford and Simones Island, Clinch River, Tennessee and Virginia. ...................... 34 PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR 2010-2011 ................................................................................... 36 Paul L. Angermeier ................................................................................................... 36 W. Mark Ford ............................................................................................................ 37 PUBLICATIONS and PROFESSIONAL PAPERS PRESENTED .............................................. 38 Published ................................................................................................................... 38 In Press ...................................................................................................................... 39 In Review .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fish of Greatest Conservation Need
    APPENDIX G. FISH OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Taxa Common Name Scientific Name Tier Opportunity Ranking Fish Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus IV a Fish Allegheny pearl dace Margariscus margarita IV b Fish American brook lamprey Lampetra appendix IV c Fish American eel Anguilla rostrata III a Fish American shad Alosa sapidissima IV a Fish Appalachia darter Percina gymnocephala IV c Fish Ashy darter Etheostoma cinereum I b Fish Atlantic sturgeon Acipenser oxyrinchus I b Fish Banded sunfish Enneacanthus obesus IV c Fish Bigeye jumprock Moxostoma ariommum III c Fish Black sculpin Cottus baileyi IV c Fish Blackbanded sunfish Enneacanthus chaetodon I a Fish Blackside darter Percina maculata IV c Fish Blotched chub Erimystax insignis IV c Fish Blotchside logperch Percina burtoni II a Fish Blueback Herring Alosa aestivalis IV a Fish Bluebreast darter Etheostoma camurum IV c Fish Blueside darter Etheostoma jessiae IV c Fish Bluestone sculpin Cottus sp. 1 III c Fish Brassy Jumprock Moxostoma sp. IV c Fish Bridle shiner Notropis bifrenatus I a Fish Brook silverside Labidesthes sicculus IV c Fish Brook Trout Salvelinus fontinalis IV a Fish Bullhead minnow Pimephales vigilax IV c Fish Candy darter Etheostoma osburni I b Fish Carolina darter Etheostoma collis II c Virginia Wildlife Action Plan 2015 APPENDIX G. FISH OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED Fish Carolina fantail darter Etheostoma brevispinum IV c Fish Channel darter Percina copelandi III c Fish Clinch dace Chrosomus sp. cf. saylori I a Fish Clinch sculpin Cottus sp. 4 III c Fish Dusky darter Percina sciera IV c Fish Duskytail darter Etheostoma percnurum I a Fish Emerald shiner Notropis atherinoides IV c Fish Fatlips minnow Phenacobius crassilabrum II c Fish Freshwater drum Aplodinotus grunniens III c Fish Golden Darter Etheostoma denoncourti II b Fish Greenfin darter Etheostoma chlorobranchium I b Fish Highback chub Hybopsis hypsinotus IV c Fish Highfin Shiner Notropis altipinnis IV c Fish Holston sculpin Cottus sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Candy Darter Recovery Outline
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Candy Darter Recovery Outline Photo by Corey Dunn, University of Missouri Species Name: Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) Species Range: Upper Kanawha River Basin including the Gauley, Greenbrier, and New River Watersheds including portions of Greenbrier, Pocahontas, Nicholas, and Webster counties in West Virginia; and Bland, Giles, and Wythe counties, Virginia. The range of the species is shown in figure 1 below. Recovery Priority Number: 5; explanation provided below Listing Status: Endangered; November 21, 2019; 83 FR 58747 Lead Regional Office/Cooperating RO(s): Northeast Region, Hadley MA Lead Field Office/Cooperating FO(s): West Virginia Field Office, Elkins WV; Southwestern Virginia Field Office, Abingdon, VA; White Sulphur Springs National Fish Hatchery, White Sulphur Springs, WV Lead Contact: Barbara Douglas, 304-636-6586 ext 19. [email protected] 1) Background This section provides a brief overview of the ecology and conservation of the candy darter. This information is more fully described in the Species Status Assessment (SSA), the final listing rule, and the proposed critical habitat rule. These documents are available at: https://www.fws.gov/northeast/candydarter/ 1 Type and Quality of Available Information to Date: Important Information Gaps and Treatment of Uncertainties One of the primary threats that resulted in the listing of the candy darter under the Endangered Species Act (ESA) is the spread of the introduced variegate darter (Etheostoma variatum). This species hybridizes with the candy darter. Key information gaps and areas of uncertainty for the recovery and management of the candy darter include whether there are any habitat or other natural factors that could limit the spread of variegate darter.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    Proceedings of the United States National Museum SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION . WASHINGTON, D.C. Volume 119 1966 Number 3550 CATALOG OF TYPE SPECIMENS OF THE DARTERS (PISCES, PERCIDAE, ETHEOSTOMATINI) ^ By Bruce B. Collette and Leslie W. Knapp ^ Introduction The darters are a tribe of small freshwater fishes restricted to North America. Some 212 specific and subspecific names have been pro- posed for the approximately 100 vahd described species. About a dozen species await description. As part of a long-term study of these fishes, we have prepared this catalog of type specimens. We hope that our efforts will be of value in furthering systematic research and stabilizing the nomenclature of this most fascinating group of North American fishes. In preparing this catalog we have attempted to examine or at least to verify the location of the type specimens of all nominal forms of the three presently recognized genera of darters: Percina, Ammo- crypta, and Etheostoma. By type specimens we mean holotypes, lectotypes, syntypes, paralectotypes, and paratypes. Each form is ' Fifth paper in a series on the systematics of the Percidae by the senior author. 2 Collette: Assistant Laboratory Director, Bureau of Commercial Fisheries Ichthyological Laboratory, Division of Fishes, U.S. National Museum; Knapp: Supervisor in charge of vertebrates, Oceanographic Sorting Center, Smithsonian Institution. a 2 PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. 119 listed in alphabetical order by the generic and specific name used in the original description. If subgeneric allocation was made in the original description, that name has been placed in parentheses between the genus and the species. Holotypes or lectotypes are listed before paratypes or paralectotypes.
    [Show full text]
  • Kyfishid[1].Pdf
    Kentucky Fishes Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission To conserve, protect and enhance Kentucky’s fish and wildlife resources and provide outstanding opportunities for hunting, fishing, trapping, boating, shooting sports, wildlife viewing, and related activities. Federal Aid Project funded by your purchase of fishing equipment and motor boat fuels Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources #1 Sportsman’s Lane, Frankfort, KY 40601 1-800-858-1549 • fw.ky.gov Kentucky Fish & Wildlife’s Mission Kentucky Fishes by Matthew R. Thomas Fisheries Program Coordinator 2011 (Third edition, 2021) Kentucky Department of Fish & Wildlife Resources Division of Fisheries Cover paintings by Rick Hill • Publication design by Adrienne Yancy Preface entucky is home to a total of 245 native fish species with an additional 24 that have been introduced either intentionally (i.e., for sport) or accidentally. Within Kthe United States, Kentucky’s native freshwater fish diversity is exceeded only by Alabama and Tennessee. This high diversity of native fishes corresponds to an abun- dance of water bodies and wide variety of aquatic habitats across the state – from swift upland streams to large sluggish rivers, oxbow lakes, and wetlands. Approximately 25 species are most frequently caught by anglers either for sport or food. Many of these species occur in streams and rivers statewide, while several are routinely stocked in public and private water bodies across the state, especially ponds and reservoirs. The largest proportion of Kentucky’s fish fauna (80%) includes darters, minnows, suckers, madtoms, smaller sunfishes, and other groups (e.g., lam- preys) that are rarely seen by most people.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Freshwater Mussels
    Native Freshwater Mussels January 2007 Fish and Wildlife Habitat Management Leaflet Number 46 Introduction Freshwater mussels belong to the phylum Mollusca, the second most diverse group of animals in the world in terms of number of described species. The phy- lum consists of approximately 100,000 freshwater, marine, and terrestrial species and includes mussels, snails, octopi, squid, as well as several other less fa- miliar groups. Although freshwater mussels are dis- tributed throughout the world, they reach their great- est diversity in North America, east of the Mississippi River. United States mussel populations have been in Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries decline since the late 1800s for a number of reasons. Although freshwater mussels are found throughout Currently, nearly three-quarters of North America’s much of the world, they reach their greatest diversity native freshwater mussel species are considered en- in North America. dangered, threatened, or species of special concern, and some researchers believe that as many as 35 spe- cies (12%) are already extinct. >80 species The objective of this leaflet is to raise awareness 71–80 species about the decline of freshwater mussels in North 61–70 species America, their life history requirements, and the im- 51–60 species 41–50 species portant ecological role they play in aquatic habitats. 31–40 species In addition, this leaflet provides a number of practi- 21–30 species cal habitat management considerations to help pro- 11–20 species tect freshwater mussel populations. Freshwater mus- 1–10 species sels can also be referred to as freshwater clams or Adapted from presentation of Kevis S.
    [Show full text]
  • Etheostoma Osburni) in West Virginia
    Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports 2020 Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia Brin E. Kessinger West Virginia University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd Part of the Biology Commons Recommended Citation Kessinger, Brin E., "Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia" (2020). Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports. 7670. https://researchrepository.wvu.edu/etd/7670 This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by the The Research Repository @ WVU with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you must obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in WVU Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Problem Reports collection by an authorized administrator of The Research Repository @ WVU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Utilizing conservation genetics as a strategy for recovering the endangered Candy Darter (Etheostoma osburni) in West Virginia Brin Kessinger Thesis submitted to the Davis College of Agriculture, Natural Resources and Design at West Virginia University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife and Fisheries Resources Amy B.
    [Show full text]
  • Pelagic Larval Duration Links Life History Traits and Species Persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)
    University of Tennessee, Knoxville TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange Masters Theses Graduate School 8-2013 Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) Morgan Jessica Douglas [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes Part of the Other Ecology and Evolutionary Biology Commons Recommended Citation Douglas, Morgan Jessica, "Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae). " Master's Thesis, University of Tennessee, 2013. https://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_gradthes/2410 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of TRACE: Tennessee Research and Creative Exchange. For more information, please contact [email protected]. To the Graduate Council: I am submitting herewith a thesis written by Morgan Jessica Douglas entitled "Pelagic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae)." I have examined the final electronic copy of this thesis for form and content and recommend that it be accepted in partial fulfillment of the equirr ements for the degree of Master of Science, with a major in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology. Christopher D. Hulsey, Major Professor We have read this thesis and recommend its acceptance: Alison Boyer, James Fordyce Accepted for the Council: Carolyn R. Hodges Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School (Original signatures are on file with official studentecor r ds.) Pel agic larval duration links life history traits and species persistence in Darters (Percidae: Etheostomatinae) A Thesis Presented for the Master of Science Degree The University of Tennessee, Knoxville Morgan Jessica Douglas August 2013 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jen Schweitzer, Joe Bailey, and Phillip Hollingsworth provided useful comments and encouragement.
    [Show full text]
  • 20117202334.Pdf
    Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. Plans published by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) are sometimes prepared with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, State agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Plans are reviewed by the public and submitted to additional peer review before they are adopted by the Service. Objectives of the plan will be attained and any necessary funds will be made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific tasks and may not represent the views nor the official positions or approval of any individuals or agencies involved in developing the plan, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent the official position of the Service only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery tasks. By approving this recovery plan, the Regional Director certifies that the data used in its development represent the best scientific and commercial information available at the time it was written. Copies of all documents reviewed in the development of this plan are available in the administrative record located at the Asheville Field Office in Asheville, North Carolina. Literature citations should read as follows: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2004. Recovery Plan for Cumberland Elktoe, Oyster Mussel, Cumberlandian Combshell, Purple Bean, and Rough Rabbitsfoot.
    [Show full text]
  • Freshwater Mussels of the National Park Service Obed Wild and Scenic River, Tennessee
    Malacological Review, 2017, 45/46: 193-211 FRESHWATER MUSSELS OF THE NATIONAL PARK SERVICE OBED WILD AND SCENIC RIVER, TENNESSEE Steven A. Ahlstedt1, Joseph F. Connell2, Steve Bakaletz3, and Mark T. Fagg4 ABSTRACT The Obed River was designated as a Wild and Scenic River (WSR) in 1976 and is a unit of the National Park Service. The river is considered to be among the highest quality in the state of Tennessee supporting a rich ecological diversity. Two federally listed species (one fish and one mussel) occur in the Obed: spotfin chub Cyprinella monacha, and purple bean Villosa perpurpurea. The Obed is a major tributary to the upper Emory River. Historical mussel collections and recent sampling have documented 27 species in the drainage. Freshwater mussel sampling was relegated to the Obed WSR and tributaries to determine species composition, abundance, and whether reproduction and recruitment is occurring to the fauna. Mussel sampling was conducted from 2000-2001 within the boundaries of the WSR at access points throughout the length of the Obed including portions of the upper Emory River, Daddy’s, Clear, and Whites creek. A total of 585 mussels representing nine species were found during the study. The most abundant mussel found was Villosa iris that comprised 55% of the fauna, followed by Lampsilis fasciola 19% and Medionidus conradicus 14%. The federally endangered V. perpurpurea was represented at 3%. Two species, Pleuronaia barnesiana (live) and Lampsilis cardium (fresh dead), were found as single individuals and P. barnesiana is a new distribution record for the Obed. The mussel fauna in the Obed WSR is relatively rare and historically the river may never have had a more diverse fauna because of the biologically non-productive nature of shale and sandstone that characterize streams on the Cumberland Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinch River, Cedar Bluff Area
    Freshwater Mussel Survey of Three Sites at Cedar Bluff, Clinch River, Virginia: Augmentation Monitoring Sites - 2007 By: Nathan L. Eckert and Michael J. Pinder Contributors: Joe J. Ferraro, Brian T. Watson, Amanda E. Wood Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries Wildlife Diversity Division March 13, 2009 Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................... 4 Objective ............................................................................................................................ 5 Study Area ......................................................................................................................... 5 Methods.............................................................................................................................. 6 Results .............................................................................................................................. 10 Davis Property................................................................................................................. 10 Semi-quantitative ............................................................................................................ 10 Qualitative ....................................................................................................................... 10 Lindsey Property............................................................................................................. 11 Semi-quantitative ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • US Fish and Wildlife Service
    Dwarf Wedgemussel Alasmidonta heterodon 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service New England Field Office Concord, NH 5-YEAR REVIEW Species reviewed: Dwarf wedgemussel (Alasmidonta heterodon) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 GENERAL INFORMATION ........................................................................ ..... 3 1.1 Reviewers................................................................................................. 3 1.2 Methodology used to complete the review .... .... .. ..... .. .. .. .. .. ... .. .. .... ....... .. 3 1.3 Background............................................................................................... 4 2.0 REVIEW ANALYSIS............. ............................................................................. 5 2.1 Application of the 1996 Distinct Population Segment policy................... 5 2.2 Recovery Criteria....................................................................................... 5 2.3 Updated Information and Current Species Status...................................... 7 2.3. l Biology and habitat........................................................................ 7 2.3.2 Five-Factor Analysis...................................................................... 11 2.4 Synthesis.................................................................................................... 13 3.0 RESULTS............................................................................................................... 14 3 .1 Recommended Classification.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for the Round Hickorynut Mussel (Obovaria Subrotunda)
    Species Status Assessment Report for the Round Hickorynut Mussel (Obovaria subrotunda) Photo credit: Environment Canada October 2019 Version 1.0 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Region 4 Atlanta, GA 1 Primary Contributors • Andrew Henderson - Asheville Field Office, Lead Biologist (Region 4) – primary author • Heidi Crowell - Pacific Southwest Regional Office, SAT Project Manager (Region 8) • Mark Endries - Asheville Field Office (Region 4) – mapping support Contributors & Agency Reviewers (underlined) • Paul Hartfield, Leroy Koch (retired), Angela Boyer, Stephanie Chance (retired), Bob Anderson, Tyler Hern, Andy Ford, Patty Morrison (retired), Bob Butler (retired), Josh Hundley (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) • Dr. Todd Morris (Fisheries & Oceans Canada) • Chuck Howard (retired), Tim Keeling (Tennessee Valley Authority) • Kierstin Carlson (Western Pennsylvania Conservancy) • Steve Ahlstedt (retired) (U.S. Geological Survey) • Dr. Arthur Bogan, Jamie Smith (North Carolina Museum of Natural Sciences) • Jeremy Tiemann, Rachel Vinsel, Kevin Cummings (Illinois Natural History Survey) • Heidi Dunn, Emily Grossman (Ecological Specialists, Inc.) • Dr. Paul Johnson, Jeff Garner, Michael Buntin, Todd Fobian, Ashley Peters (Alabama Department of Conservation and Natural Resources) • Gerry Dinkins (University of Tennessee) • Matt Johnson, Greg Zimmermann (EnviroScience, Inc.) • Mike Compton, Ian Horn (Kentucky State Nature Preserves Commission) • Chad Lewis, Clarissa Lawliss (Lewis Environmental Consulting) • Nevin Welte (Pennsylvania Boat and Fish Commission) • Amy Mahar, Nick Conrad (New York Natural Heritage Program) • Darran Crabtree (New York Chapter, The Nature Conservancy) • Debbie Wolschki (Ohio Natural Heritage Program) • Janet Clayton (West Virginia Natural Resources) • Brant Fisher (Indiana Department of Natural Resources) • Dr. Monte McGregor, Adam Shepard, Keith Wethington (Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources) • Stuart McGregor (Geological Survey of Alabama) • Don Hubbs, Jason Wisenwski (Tennessee Wildlife Resources Agency) • Dr.
    [Show full text]