Bdo M&A Snapshots
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The UK's Largest Event Dedicated to the Design & Construction of Schools
2010 The UK’s largest event dedicated to the design & construction of schools MeetMeet the the project project leaders leaders School design is key to pupil PAGE 5 success, say headteachers PAGE 8 Over FREE! Headteachers seminar theatre PAGE 4 300 exhibitors! Keynote addresses from: Lord Puttnam, Paul Finch, CABE, Tim Byles, PfS and Baroness Morris of Yardley, PAGE 2-3 Panel discussions with: Barry Sheerman MP, Judith Bennett, National Governors’ Association Malcolm Trobe, Association of School and And lots College Leaders PAGE 2-3 more! Book your place today at: buildingschools.co.uk Platinum sponsors Gold sponsors Event partners Media partners pantone 349 Conference programme on the experience of two award winning local authorities and their schools and partners. Speakers will include: BSEC 2010 includes a two-day Chair: Nina Woodcock, head of capital programmes, Becta paid for conference Steve Moss, strategic director for ICT, Partnerships for Schools Penny Patterson, senior inspector ICT futures, London Borough of Havering Marcus Orlovsky, founder member and director, The BSEC conference runs over two days Richard Ayre, vice principal, Brittons School and Bryanston Square and attracts almost 1,000 delegates. The Technology College, Havering Thoughts of a former headteacher latest programme is detailed below: James Grant, Sheffield BSF manager, Civica Glynis Gower, former headteacher of Penistone Grammar School & educationalist with BAM PPP 3. Sustainability 12.40 – 13.40 Lunch and exhibition viewing By next February the DCSF Zero Carbon [Schools] Task Force will make significant 13.40 Panel: Schools capital programmes for Day one announcements impacting contractors. Attend the future this session to discover the requirements, and Wednesday 24 February Gain insight on what future government means to achieve them through the award policy could mean for the nature of future winning Acharacle primary school. -
LPPA Statement of Consultation 25.06.13
Ashfield District Council Local Plan Statement of Consultation July 2013 Ashfield District Council - Statement of Consultation Contents 1. Introduction 2. Statutes and Regulations 3. Duty to Co-Operate 4. Ashfield Local Development Framework Consultations 5. Ashfield Local Plan 2010-2023 Preferred Approach Consultation • Form of Consultation • Summary of Responses • Key changes made to the Local Plan Appendices Appendix One: Ashfield Local Plan 2010-2023 Preferred Approach Consultation. Summary of responses, the Council response to issues raised and proposed changes to the Local Plan. Appendix Two: List of bodies and persons invited to make representations Appendix Three: List of Respondents 1 Ashfield District Council - Statement of Consultation Introduction 1.1 This Statement of Consultation sets out the details of publicity and consultation undertaken to prepare and inform the Ashfield District Council Local Plan. This Statement fulfils the requirements of Regulation 22 (1)c of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012 to prepare a statement setting out how the Local Planning Authority (LPA) has complied with Regulation 18 of the same Regulations in preparation of the Local Plan. 1.2 The purpose of this Statement is to describe the consultations undertaken at each of the previous stages of the preparation of the Local Plan. The Statement summarises which bodies and persons were invited to make representations up to and including the most recent, Preferred Approach stage, how they were invited to do this, a summary of the main issues raised and how they have been taken into account by the Council. 1.3 Previous public consultations took place in relation to the review of the Ashfield Local Plan (2002) as part of the ‘Local Development Framework’ (LDF) process, following the national guidance of the time. -
(A) Bond Plaintiffs' Motion
Case 1:08-cv-09522-SHS Document 160 Filed 06/07/13 Page 1 of 89 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE CITIGROUP INC. BOND LITIGATION Master File No. 08 Civ. 9522 (SHS) ECF Case DECLARATION OF STEVEN B. SINGER IN SUPPORT OF: (I) BOND PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND PLAN OF ALLOCATION, AND (II) BOND COUNSEL’S MOTION FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES AND REIMBURSEMENT OF LITIGATION EXPENSES Case 1:08-cv-09522-SHS Document 160 Filed 06/07/13 Page 2 of 89 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. PROSECUTION OF THE ACTION .................................................................................. 4 A. Bond Counsel’s Efforts to Identify and Preserve the Claims of Investors in Citigroup’s Bonds and Preferred Stock .................................................................. 4 B. Preparation of the Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, and Summary of the Claims Asserted ........................................................................... 6 C. The Citigroup Defendants’ and the Underwriter Defendants’ Extensive Motions to Dismiss ............................................................................................... 12 D. The Court’s Opinions Largely Denying Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, and Denying Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration ........................................ 15 E. Bond Plaintiffs Conduct Extensive Discovery and Motion Practice -
Thomas Cook Finance Plc €400,000,000 6.75% Senior Notes Due 2021
OFFERING MEMORANDUM Thomas Cook Finance plc €400,000,000 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021 Thomas Cook Finance plc, a public limited company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales (the “Issuer”), on 21 January 2015 issued (the “Offering”) €400,000,000 aggregate principal amount of its 6.75% Senior Notes due 2021 (the “Notes”). The Issuer will pay interest on the Notes semi-annually on each of 15 June and 15 December, commencing 15 June 2015. The Notes will mature on 15 June 2021. Prior to 15 January 2018, the Issuer will be entitled to redeem all or a portion of the Notes by paying 100% of the principal amount of the Notes plus the relevant “make-whole” premium as more specifically described in this Offering Memorandum. At any time on or after 15 January 2018, the Issuer may redeem all or part of the Notes at the redemption prices set forth in this Offering Memorandum. In addition, prior to 15 January 2018, the Issuer may redeem up to 35% of the Notes with the aggregate proceeds from certain equity offerings at a redemption price of 106.750% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. Upon the occurrence of certain events constituting a change of control or upon the sale of certain assets, the Issuer may be required to make an offer to purchase the Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. In addition, in the event of certain developments affecting taxation, the Issuer may redeem all, but not less than all, of the Notes. -
Evaluation of Motivation in Crowdfunding – a Study of the Reasons for Accredited Investors to Use Equity- Based Platforms in Order to Fund Start-Ups
Master’s Thesis – MSc. In Economics & Business Administration Evaluation of motivation in crowdfunding – A study of the reasons for accredited investors to use equity- based platforms in order to fund start-ups Author: Michele Bianchini Supervisor: Olaf Thiele Hand-in Date: 13th of May, 2016 Number of pages and characters: 80 pages, 158,339 characters (excl. front page, table of contents and references) Copenhagen Business School, 2016 1 2 Abstract Crowdfunding has demonstrated to be an efficient way to attract capitals for any kind of project. In addition, thanks to the advent of equity-based platforms, the funding gap issue faced by start-ups and SMEs can be easily solved. Nevertheless, accredited investors – Banks, Venture Capitalists, and Business Angels – have not already shown any particular interest toward crowdfunding, as they do not directly invest in entrepreneurial project through equity-crowdfunding platforms. Thus, the thesis aims to evaluate the underlying motivations for accredited investors to use equity-based platforms in order to fund start-ups. To do that, it has been selected a motivational framework called Self- Determination Theory, developed by Ryan and Deci. The framework identifies two different typologies of motivation: extrinsic and intrinsic. The latter refers to performing a task because it is inherently interesting, satisfying or enjoyable, while the former refers to doing something because it leads to a separable outcome. Moreover, Self- Determination Theory, within extrinsic motivation, distinguish four motivation “stages”: External Regulation, Introjection, Identification, and Integration. Amotivation, instead, is the state characterized by the individual’s lack of intention to act. Then, in the third section of the thesis, the SDT framework has been applied to the case of accredited investors, in order to understand how extrinsically and intrinsically motivated task about crowdfunding work in relation to their business model. -
Tarmac Building Products Limited S172 Statement
Tarmac Building Products Limited Section 172(1) statement The Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018 (the “Regulations”) have been in force with effect from 1 January 2019. The Regulations aim to extend sustainable and responsible governance practice beyond listed companies to private limited companies. Amongst other things, the Regulations require Tarmac Building Products Limited (the “Company”) to report how the directors of the Company have considered their duties under section 172 (of the Companies Act 2006 (the “Act”)) (“Section 172”), to promote the success of the Company, during the reporting period. The principal activity of the Company’s business is that of the provision of building materials across the UK and its activities and purpose frame the board’s approach to governance. The Company is part of the Tarmac sub-group of companies in the UK and is ultimately owned by CRH plc (“CRH”). CRH and its subsidiaries are referred to as the Group. In the management of its subsidiaries, the Group defines the measurement of success as long term value creation for the benefit of both the immediate entity and the wider Group with consideration to the Company's immediate stakeholders and those of the Group also. The Group recognises the need to have appropriate levels of governance across its subsidiaries as part of its approach to risk mitigation and wider stakeholder engagement strategy. The Group maintains strong levels of governance at both an enterprise wide and legal entity level, and as a result of increased regulation, CRH and its UK subsidiary boards recognise the need to move to a more structured approach and formalise key governance standards across its UK subsidiaries. -
1 Agenda Item: 07 LIST of APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS
Agenda Item: 07 LIST OF APPLICATIONS DETERMINED UNDER DELEGATED POWERS Period for Report: 1 February 2020 – 31 March 2020 EASTERN QUARRY: Application Reference: EDC/20/0005 Decision Date: 12 February 2020 Location: Parcels B & C Castle Hill, Eastern Quarry, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Taylor Wimpey Proposal: Application for the partial discharge of condition 4 attached to planning permission reference no. EDC/19/0090 relating to Building Regulations part M4(2) compliance. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Condition Discharged Application Reference: EDC/19/0211 Decision Date: 04 March 2020 Location: Eastern Quarry - Phase 5 - Site L, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Chartway Group Proposal: Application for a non-material amendment to Reserved Matters approval reference EDC/17/0148 for the minor modification to the location and quantum of external lighting within the site. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions Application Reference: EDC/19/0210 Decision Date: 04 March 2020 Location: Eastern Quarry - Phase 5 - Site I, Watling Street, Swanscombe, Kent Applicant: Chartway Group Proposal: Application for a non-material amendment to planning permission EDC/17/0064, to allow modification to the location, quantum and refinement of external lighting. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions 1 Application Reference: EDC/20/0009 Decision Date: 13 March 2020 Location: Castle Hill Neighbourhood Area, Cherry Orchard, Castle Hill, Ebbsfleet Valley, Kent Applicant: David Lock Associates Proposal: Change of Use of Unit 3 from A1, A2, A3, A5 to A1, A2, A3, D1. Ward: Ebbsfleet Decision: Approved Subject to Conditions Application Reference: EDC/19/0103 Decision Date: 17 March 2020 Location: Redundant Buildings Eastern Quarry Watling Street Swanscombe Kent Applicant: Erith Contractors Ltd Proposal: Temporary change of use of land for use as a construction compound for the production of ready mixed concrete including the installation of associated plant. -
Private Equity a Fresh Look
Private Equity A fresh look First Published May 2012 A private equity lobbyist runs into a banking lobbyist in the street. “Oh, thanks,” he says. “For what?”the banking lobbyist asks. “For diverting all the bullets which were being shot at us,” replies the private equity lobbyist. Invariably the headlines had been all about asset stripping, how private equity houses over-leveraged companies to the point where they had so much debt they were, in effect, set up for failure should the merest breeze waft through the economy. The days of using financial engineering, in other words significant debt, as a means of generating a return for private equity houses have probably gone. The future for private equity is to achieve it from growing a business and in truth, that’s the model most private equity houses working in the real world, as it were, have always adopted. Part of the problem is the considerable confusion that exists between private equity and hedge funds. The two have often been viewed as synonymous when, in fact, they are quite different in fundamental ways. Typically, private equity is a four to five-year investment based on working with the company executives in order to create additional value. Hedge funds, on the other hand, tend to be much shorter-term (six to eighteen months), are more speculative, with generally little knowledge of the target company and its management, and less regulated. Arguably the origins of private equity in this country can be found in the formation of the Industrial and Commercial Finance Corporation at the end of the second world war to invest in companies which couldn’t get sufficient funding from the banks but were too small to turn to the stock exchange. -
The UK Private Equity IPO Report
THE UK PRIVATE EQUITY IPO REPORT Private equity-backed IPOs: 1 January 2009 – 31 December 2017 IN ASSOCIATION WITH 2 | THE UK PRIVATE EQUITY IPO REPORT CONTENTS FOREWORD 03 HISTORIC ANALYSIS OF PRIVATE EQUITY-BACKED IPOS IN THE UK 04 BETWEEN 1 JANUARY 2009 AND 31 DECEMBER 2017 VOLUME AND VALUE OF PRIVATE EQUITY-BACKED IPOS LISTING IN THE UK 05 TOP 10 PRIVATE EQUITY-BACKED IPOS 06 INDUSTRIES 07 FREE FLOAT 12 USE OF PROCEEDS 13 PRICING 14 PERFORMANCE 15 ANALYSIS OF ACTIVE PRIVATE EQUITY HOUSES BY SIZE 17 LOCK-UP PERIODS 18 HOLDING PERIODS 20 PRIVATE EQUITY-BACKED IPO ACTIVITY IN 2017 21 APPENDIX 23 PRIVATE EQUITY-BACKED IPOS 1 JANUARY 2009 - 31 DECEMBER 2017 23 METHODOLOGY 31 CONTACTS 32 3 | THE UK PRIVATE EQUITY IPO REPORT FOREWORD Public markets have long been an important exit route for private equity houses selling their stakes into the companies they have backed, yet little research has been conducted into how these businesses perform after they have floated. This report, published by the BVCA and PwC, provides an historic analysis of private equity-backed IPOs in the UK between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2017. It looks at a number of metrics including the use of proceeds, pricing and performance to build a picture of the IPO market and the key trends with the market. The performance numbers are particularly revealing as they show that private equity-backed IPOs are trading on average 43.9% higher than their offer price for the period from IPO to 31 December 2017 compared to the non-private equity-backed IPOs of the same period which are trading at an average of 26.6% higher. -
The IPO Market Aimhigh the IPO Market Foreword
AIMHigh The IPO Market AIMHigh The IPO Market Foreword At finnCap we believe passionately in the power of well as a unique insight into the state of the market. London’s capital markets. As a leading adviser to stock There are many voices debating the advantages and market-listed companies, we know the transformative disadvantages of the capital markets, and rightly so. HOSTED BY effect an IPO has on ambitious businesses. A listing Here, we seek to extend that debate by hearing directly on London’s junior market helps a company expand from those who run listed companies, those who advise Contents into new marketplaces and start conversations with them, and those who invest in them. In short, we look at partners and investors. If a company lists at the right how the theory is being put into practice. 03 Foreword time, it can lead to explosive growth. I’d like to thank all of our speakers and contributors and Sam Smith But the process can appear daunting, and it is often I hope that you find their insight useful when considering difficult to find clear, unbiased advice amongst the the next step in your business’s growth. finnCap noise. This need for clarity was the motivation behind the inaugural AIM High: The IPO Summit, held at At finnCap we want to keep the conversation going. Bloomberg Headquarters in April 2016. The challenge Don’t hesitate to contact one of our team if you would 05 AIM Perspectives we set our speakers was clear: what are the key issues like to discuss the content of this report or how we can PARTNERS an ambitious company should think about when help your business. -
Black Country Strategic Companies Barometer
Black Country Strategic Companies Barometer November 2013 1 Introduction A Business survey conducted in Sandwell identified that businesses with a turnover of £1m and over are significantly more likely to grow. 622 companies in the Black Country with a turnover of over £1m have been selected on this basis1. A significant proportion of these companies are based across our five transformational sectors – Advanced Manufacturing, Building Technologies, Transport Technologies including Aerospace, Business Services and Environmental Technologies. These sectors are vital to the reduction of our £6.2bn output gap with the national economy. Value to the Black Country Economy2 Gross Value Added GVA Number of These firms generate approximately £5.1bn (GBP) Companies of the Black Country’s Gross Value Added > £500m 1 (GVA) with 4 of these companies (Carillion Plc, RAC Limited, Homeserve and Azzurri £100-499m 8 Holdings Limited) generating £1.5 billion. £50-99m 5 The total GVA in the Black Country equates £20-49m 21 to £17.4 billion. £10-19m 32 Ensuring these companies remain in the Black Country and continue to grow is £5-9m 86 fundamental to the Sub-Region’s economy £1-4m 385 and addressing the £6.2 billion output gap. Unknown 84 Turnover Turnover Number of (GDP) Companies These 622 companies have a combined > £500m 6 turnover of approximately £23bn. £250-499m 3 6% of these strategic companies had a £100-249m 26 turnover of £100m or more. £50-99m 46 44% of these companies have a turnover of £20-49m 97 less than £10m. £15-19m 60 £10-14m 98 £5-9m 135 £1-4m 140 1 These companies have been identified using the Bureau Van Dijk’s FAME database, which is based on information submitted to Companies House. -
Productivity and Skills Commission
WMCA Productivity & Skills Commission Supporting Evidence Pack November 2016 Slide 3 – WMCA Productivity Problem Statement Slide 4 – Output Gap Analysis Slide 5 onwards –Sector Scorecards covering 7 Transformational Sectors: Advanced manufacturing and engineering; Business, professional and financial services; Construction (building technologies); Digital and creative; Lifesciences and health care; Logistics and transport technologies; Low carbon and environmental technologies. - The Sector Scorecards include: • An analysis of the sectors and sub sectors in terms of GVA, jobs and Businesses – current and ambitions levels • Identification of the top 50 companies in each sector and an high/medium/low value added impact analysis • Foreign ownership analysis WMCA Productivity & Skills Commissions – the Problem Statement P1 – On all Measures of Productivity Performance of the WMCA is below the National Average Output Gap P1.1 There is a £14bn Output Gap - GVA per head in the WMCA is currently at £19,423 – which is nearly £3,500 less for each of the 4 million WMCA residents leading to a £14bn output gap compared to the national average. Sectoral Variation GVA Jobs GVA per employee (£m, 2013) (2013) (2013) WMCA WMCA % % WMCA UK Total Total Total 77,727 1,899,264 £40,925 £45,428 Business, Professional and Financial Services 19,731 25.4% 317,503 16.7% £62,144 £77,324 Retail 11,078 14.3% 316,277 16.7% £35,026 £35,811 Public Sector inc Education 10,802 13.9% 318,104 16.7% £33,956 £37,370 Advanced Manufacturing and Engineering 8,572 11.0% 184,156 9.7% £46,545 £49,267 Logistics and Transport Technologies 7,266 9.3% 152,794 8.0% £47,555 £48,283 Life Sciences and Healthcare inc.