DOCSLIB.ORG

Defence Platform Design and Support

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Defence Platform Design and Support Defence platform design and support Services and solutions Independent expertise, innovative solutions Contents 1: Surface ship design and support 1 2 3 2: Specialist naval platforms 3: Submarine design and support 4 5 6 4: Specialist submarine design support 5: Land system design and support 6: ISTAR (Intelligence, Surveillance, 7 Target Acquisition and Reconnaissance) System Design and Support 7: Air system design and support BMT is a leading engineering, to provide an impartial view, for Sea, Land, ISTAR and Air. More science and technology supported by our status as an importantly, we also understand consultancy, employing Employee Benefit Trust (EBT), that getting a platform into service approximately 1,300 professionals free from the influence of external is not the only challenge for our in 60 offices across Europe, Asia, stakeholders. customers and that keeping the Americas and Australia. With it safe for use, capable and a defence heritage that stretches Our technical expertise, operationally available over many all the way from the water tanks combined with our history of close years is also vital. It is here that where the ‘bouncing bomb’ association with major defence our substantial experience extends was developed during WWII organisations in Europe, the US, to delivering effective, innovative to the ground breaking design Canada and Australia, means we and technically advanced for the new Queen Elizabeth bring a deep understanding of the solutions for supporting and aircraft carrier, BMT delivers challenges our customers face, adapting our customers’ military complex engineering and design and can provide a wide range of platforms throughout their lifetime capabilities for European, North solutions. to maximise their operational American, Australian and Asian capability. customers. As we are not directly As you will see in the following engaged in manufacturing pages, BMT delivers defence or construction, we are able design and engineering services BMT delivers defence design and engineering services for Sea, Land, ISTAR and Air. Surface ship design and support Our designers and engineers have the flexibility and capability to undertake the complete design and assurance of new naval platforms, as well as introduce, execute and manage design changes to existing in-service naval vessels. We are the leading independent centre of BMT is at the cutting edge of technology We also advise acquisition agencies on excellence for naval design and through- and science, and we pride ourselves on balancing the capabilities of the ships T-AO (X) life support in Europe and North America, executing our customers’ requirements they procure against their build, through- BMT is supporting General Dynamics and one of the few external organisations both within budget and on time. We are life operating and disposal costs. Our NASSCO’s contract with the US Navy to be named by the UK Ministry of recognised for our depth of experience, systems engineers and naval designers to conduct a range of studies to better Defence as a Delegated Naval Authority. broad technical expertise, long-term can make significant contributions from inform the navy’s T-AO (X) design. This We also undertake major surface ship partnership management, impartial advice the very first concept studies, through the will replace the legacy T-AO 187 class, defence projects in Australia and South and reliability. detailed design phase to ship construction providing fuel and cargo delivery to East Asia. and on-going in-service support. support a full range of fleet operations. Auxiliaries Our naval architects, engineers and consultants have extensive experience with auxiliary ships mainly from supporting the platforms operated by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary. This has now extended to the design of complete auxiliary platform solutions based on our Aegir family of designs. BMT’s original concept design, Aegir®, is the blueprint for a family of naval support vessels that can replenish ships at sea and, due to their advanced double-hulled design, are compliant with the latest IMO environmental regulations. The design has been adopted by the UK and Norwegian navies for their latest support vessels and is under serious consideration by several other naval forces around the world. © BMT Defence Services - DefenceImaging.com © US Navy RFA ARGUS Conversion MARS Norwegian LSV Joint Support Ship (JSS) BMT designed the conversion of RFA BMT is working alongside Daewoo BMT is the design contractor for BMT has supported the Canadian JSS ARGUS into a Primary Casualty Receiving Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering the Norwegian Defence Logistics project office for several years with Facility with approximately 100 hospital (DSME) to deliver the Royal Navy’s MARS Organisation’s logistics and support concept studies, preliminary designs, beds and associated medical facilities. (Military Afloat Reach and Sustainability) vessel (LSV). We are also conducting safety assessments, through-life support Safety was the main priority as well as tanker, which will provide fuel, food and safety assessments and through-life assessments and a contract design maintaining her Naval Authority and fresh water to naval vessels at sea. BMT is support assessments for the vessel. The concept to allow a value for money Statute Certificate by improving fire safety, providing the design, safety assessment, LSV is designed to serve multiple roles, comparison with the selected design. escape and evacuation, damage stability and through-life support assessment of will be built by DSME. All these elements have made a strong and environmental friendliness in line with the new tanker. contribution to this crucial programme current legislation and standards. for replacing the Royal Canadian Navy’s ageing Auxiliary Oiler Replenishment ships. Specialist naval platforms Caimen Concept design As amphibious platforms become Our proven design expertise, supported As the world’s largest independent naval design consultancy, BMT offers a increasingly vulnerable to coastal craft by our commitment to R&D and deep and shore batteries, the operating range understanding of customer needs, comprehensive portfolio of design services for advanced and specialised vessels to meet of landing craft launch has increased mean that we are leaders in concept exacting specifications. We are known for innovation but do not regard it as an end in to beyond the horizon, making speed designs that focus on innovation and the important for maintaining tempo and application of new technologies. itself. Rather, we combine it with our long experience of working for defence organisations reducing the threat of interdiction. BMT’s and apply our expertise to deliver practical, effective solutions. family of Caimen® designs provide a step COHORT capability change thanks to an innovative BMT’s concept design COHORT aims tribow hull design and water jet propulsion to help governments establish effective system enabling operation at high speeds. and enforceable Exclusive Economic Zones. It provides a versatile and cost- effective platform for multiple roles including fishery management, safety of navigation and transit, and protection of the environment. Canadian Surface Combatant Canberra Class Landing Helicopter US Coast Guard (CSC) project Dock (LHD) BMT is supporting a human factors BMT is supporting the Royal Canadian BMT is working with the Royal Australian assessment on the US Coast Guard’s Navy’s CSC project as its dedicated Navy’s Amphibious Deployment and new offshore patrol vessel to ensure design, engineering and programme Sustainment (ADAS) project office to that the design meets the requirements management contractor with a large support the development of safety of the users. number of tasks including concept requirements and management for design, requirements specifications and the two 27,000-tonne Canberra class Longbow cost modelling, which aims to replace the amphibious ships known as Landing BMT redesigned and converted the navy’s current surface combatant fleet Helicopter Docks (LHDs). 12,000-tonne heavy lift barge, Longbow, of Iroquois class destroyers and Halifax to enable it to undertake pre-qualification Class frigates. sea trials for the Principle Anti-Air Missile © BMT Defence Services - DefenceImaging.com System Sampson (PAAMS(S)). 1 Propulsion systems BMT is supporting the US Navy’s Electric Ships Office in the development of hybrid 2 3 propulsion systems. Our work includes a retro back fit programme designed to improve the efficiency of existing DDG51 ships. 1: Onuk BMT is and has provided specialised BMT undertook the full detailed design and support as the propulsion systems construction drawing of this as well as extensive integrator in support of the Integrated hull optimisation to allow it to achieve a speed of 45 knots with excellent sea-keeping Platform Management for the new characteristics and extended range. Landing Ship Tank (LST) vessels for the Republic of Korea Navy (ROKN). 2: Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carrier BMT’s involvement in this high profile project dates back to the selection of our innovative twin-island platform ship design. Advantages of the twin-island configuration include increased Specialist design, In-service, substantial experience in adapting expertise offers clients a centre of flight deck area, reduced air turbulence over life extension and disposal platforms, either updating and maintaining excellence that can augment government the flight deck and increased flexibility of space them for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Navy Columbia-Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program
    Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program: Background and Issues for Congress Updated September 14, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R41129 Navy Columbia (SSBN-826) Class Ballistic Missile Submarine Program Summary The Navy’s Columbia (SSBN-826) class ballistic missile submarine (SSBN) program is a program to design and build a class of 12 new SSBNs to replace the Navy’s current force of 14 aging Ohio-class SSBNs. Since 2013, the Navy has consistently identified the Columbia-class program as the Navy’s top priority program. The Navy procured the first Columbia-class boat in FY2021 and wants to procure the second boat in the class in FY2024. The Navy’s proposed FY2022 budget requests $3,003.0 (i.e., $3.0 billion) in procurement funding for the first Columbia-class boat and $1,644.0 million (i.e., about $1.6 billion) in advance procurement (AP) funding for the second boat, for a combined FY2022 procurement and AP funding request of $4,647.0 million (i.e., about $4.6 billion). The Navy’s FY2022 budget submission estimates the procurement cost of the first Columbia- class boat at $15,030.5 million (i.e., about $15.0 billion) in then-year dollars, including $6,557.6 million (i.e., about $6.60 billion) in costs for plans, meaning (essentially) the detail design/nonrecurring engineering (DD/NRE) costs for the Columbia class. (It is a long-standing Navy budgetary practice to incorporate the DD/NRE costs for a new class of ship into the total procurement cost of the first ship in the class.) Excluding costs for plans, the estimated hands-on construction cost of the first ship is $8,473.0 million (i.e., about $8.5 billion).
    [Show full text]
  • The Primary Casualty Receiving Facility, RFA ARGUS
    3 Operational Operational The UK maritime Role 3 medical treatment facility: the Primary Casualty Receiving Facility, RFA ARGUS Surg Capt J E Smith, Surg Cdr S R C Smith, Surg Capt G Hill Introduction that took over three years to complete. RFA ARGUS was The Royal Naval Medical Service has a maritime Role 3 named on 25 March 1987, and remains the maritime Role 3 medical treatment facility (MTF), in the form of the Primary MTF to this day. She has provided medical support to UK Casualty Receiving Facility (PCRF) on board Royal Fleet and Allied Forces during both Gulf Wars in her role as a Auxiliary (RFA) ARGUS, which in its largest confi guration primary casualty receiving ship. has 100 beds (4/4/10/20/70, indicating 4 resuscitation bays; 4 operating tables; 10 intensive care beds; 20 high- The ARGUS is not a designated hospital ship, as she carries dependency beds and 70 general beds). The purpose of this weapons systems and has other military roles. As a result article is to describe this facility, and its recent activities, in she does not operate under the protection of the Geneva particular with reference to the future potential capabilities Convention of 1949. This allows her to be placed much that are currently under review. closer to the battlespace, allowing for more rapid transfer of patients to defi nitive care. During her operational medical The ship deployment during the Iraq confl ict in 2003, she went to the The ARGUS is a 28,000 tonne Royal Fleet Auxiliary (RFA) Northern Arabian Gulf as a grey vessel (complete with her vessel, whose primary role is as a PCRF.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress
    Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress (name redacted) Specialist in Naval Affairs December 13, 2017 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RS22478 Navy Ship Names: Background for Congress Summary Names for Navy ships traditionally have been chosen and announced by the Secretary of the Navy, under the direction of the President and in accordance with rules prescribed by Congress. Rules for giving certain types of names to certain types of Navy ships have evolved over time. There have been exceptions to the Navy’s ship-naming rules, particularly for the purpose of naming a ship for a person when the rule for that type of ship would have called for it to be named for something else. Some observers have perceived a breakdown in, or corruption of, the rules for naming Navy ships. On July 13, 2012, the Navy submitted to Congress a 73-page report on the Navy’s policies and practices for naming ships. For ship types now being procured for the Navy, or recently procured for the Navy, naming rules can be summarized as follows: The first Ohio replacement ballistic missile submarine (SBNX) has been named Columbia in honor of the District of Columbia, but the Navy has not stated what the naming rule for these ships will be. Virginia (SSN-774) class attack submarines are being named for states. Aircraft carriers are generally named for past U.S. Presidents. Of the past 14, 10 were named for past U.S. Presidents, and 2 for Members of Congress. Destroyers are being named for deceased members of the Navy, Marine Corps, and Coast Guard, including Secretaries of the Navy.
    [Show full text]
  • China Naval Modernization: Implications for US Navy Capabilities
    China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities—Background and Issues for Congress Updated May 21, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33153 China Naval Modernization: Implications for U.S. Navy Capabilities Summary In an era of renewed great power competition, China’s military modernization effort, including its naval modernization effort, has become the top focus of U.S. defense planning and budgeting. China’s navy, which China has been steadily modernizing for more than 25 years, since the early to mid-1990s, has become a formidable military force within China’s near-seas region, and it is conducting a growing number of operations in more-distant waters, including the broader waters of the Western Pacific, the Indian Ocean, and waters around Europe. China’s navy is viewed as posing a major challenge to the U.S. Navy’s ability to achieve and maintain wartime control of blue-water ocean areas in the Western Pacific—the first such challenge the U.S. Navy has faced since the end of the Cold War—and forms a key element of a Chinese challenge to the long- standing status of the United States as the leading military power in the Western Pacific. China’s naval modernization effort encompasses a wide array of platform and weapon acquisition programs, including anti-ship ballistic missiles (ASBMs), anti-ship cruise missiles (ASCMs), submarines, surface ships, aircraft, unmanned vehicles (UVs), and supporting C4ISR (command and control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance) systems. China’s naval modernization effort also includes improvements in maintenance and logistics, doctrine, personnel quality, education and training, and exercises.
    [Show full text]
  • Industry Recognises A&P As Best in Practice During
    NEWSLETTER | ISSUE 6 SUMMER 2020 INDUSTRY RECOGNISES A&P AS BEST IN PRACTICE DURING COVID-19 A&P Defence has been praised for It is A&P Group’s strict programme of the risk of the virus entering our facilities its role in preparing RFA Argus Covid-19 measures that has made it and minimise disruption to vessels as and RFA Lyme Bay for urgent possible to continue essential ship repair they arrive at our sites. Customers can and maintenance work for the MoD, be assured that they face minimum deployment, as part of the UK Royal Fleet Auxiliary and Seaborne disruption when visiting our facilities as Government’s Covid-19 asset community during the pandemic. we’ve found effective ways to safeguard pandemic response. Throughout this period A&P Group our workforce and customers whilst has provided critical support to continuing to deliver essential projects.” Based at A&P Falmouth, A&P Defence RFA Mounts Bay. supported RFA Argus during an extended A&P’s Covid-19 Response Assisted Maintenance Period (AMP) A&P Tyne has also installed cable repair • Full contingency plans in place equipment to Prysmian’s North Sea Giant, earlier this year. RFA Lyme Bay was due across all three facilities. for scheduled maintenance at A&P which was essential to the safe and Falmouth in March, however the vessel continuous power supply to the • Enhanced cleaning & hygiene activities. was diverted to a Ministry of Defence National Grid. • Supply of appropriate PPE. facility to fully store for operations. A&P David McGinley, Chief Executive Officer • Enforced social distancing measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress
    Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress September 16, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL32665 Navy Force Structure and Shipbuilding Plans: Background and Issues for Congress Summary The current and planned size and composition of the Navy, the annual rate of Navy ship procurement, the prospective affordability of the Navy’s shipbuilding plans, and the capacity of the U.S. shipbuilding industry to execute the Navy’s shipbuilding plans have been oversight matters for the congressional defense committees for many years. In December 2016, the Navy released a force-structure goal that calls for achieving and maintaining a fleet of 355 ships of certain types and numbers. The 355-ship goal was made U.S. policy by Section 1025 of the FY2018 National Defense Authorization Act (H.R. 2810/P.L. 115- 91 of December 12, 2017). The Navy and the Department of Defense (DOD) have been working since 2019 to develop a successor for the 355-ship force-level goal. The new goal is expected to introduce a new, more distributed fleet architecture featuring a smaller proportion of larger ships, a larger proportion of smaller ships, and a new third tier of large unmanned vehicles (UVs). On June 17, 2021, the Navy released a long-range Navy shipbuilding document that presents the Biden Administration’s emerging successor to the 355-ship force-level goal. The document calls for a Navy with a more distributed fleet architecture, including 321 to 372 manned ships and 77 to 140 large UVs. A September 2021 Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report estimates that the fleet envisioned in the document would cost an average of between $25.3 billion and $32.7 billion per year in constant FY2021 dollars to procure.
    [Show full text]
  • Naval Postgraduate School Thesis
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS A STUDY OF THE RUSSIAN ACQUISITION OF THE FRENCH MISTRAL AMPHIBIOUS ASSAULT WARSHIPS by Patrick Thomas Baker June 2011 Thesis Advisor: Mikhail Tsypkin Second Reader: Douglas Porch Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED June 2011 Master‘s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE 5. FUNDING NUMBERS A Study of the Russian Acquisition of the French Mistral Amphibious Assault Warships 6. AUTHOR(S) Patrick Thomas Baker 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION Naval Postgraduate School REPORT NUMBER Monterey, CA 93943-5000 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Operation in Iraq, Our Diplomatic Efforts Were Concentrated in the UN Process
    OPERATIONS IN IRAQ First Reflections IRAQ PUBLISHED JULY 2003 Produced by Director General Corporate Communication Design by Directorate of Corporate Communications DCCS (Media) London IRAQ FIRST REFLECTIONS REPORT Contents Foreword 2 Chapter 1 - Policy Background to the Operation 3 Chapter 2 - Planning and Preparation 4 Chapter 3 - The Campaign 10 Chapter 4 - Equipment Capability & Logistics 22 Chapter 5 - People 28 Chapter 6 - Processes 32 Chapter 7 - After the Conflict 34 Annex A - Military Campaign Objectives 39 Annex B - Chronology 41 Annex C - Deployed Forces and Statistics 43 1 Foreword by the Secretary of State for Defence On 20 March 2003 a US-led coalition, with a substantial contribution from UK forces, began military operations against the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq. Just 4 weeks later, the regime was removed and most of Iraq was under coalition control. The success of the military campaign owed much to the determination and professionalism of the coalition’s Armed Forces and the civilians who supported them. I regret that, during the course of combat operations and subsequently, a number of Service personnel lost their lives. Their sacrifice will not be forgotten. The UK is playing a full part in the re-building of Iraq through the establishment of conditions for a stable and law-abiding Iraqi government. This process will not be easy after years of repression and neglect by a brutal regime. Our Armed Forces are performing a vital and dangerous role by contributing to the creation of a secure environment so that normal life can be resumed, and by working in support of humanitarian organisations to help the Iraqi people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Law of Submarine Warfare Today
    Jacobson 205 Chapter VIII The Law of Submarine Warfare Today by Jon L. Jacobson* Introduction he roles of military submarines have evolved throughout the twentieth T century. In wartime, these roles have included coastal defense, harassment of enemy fleets, and, especially in World War II, hunting and destroying the seaborne commerce that supported the enemy's war efforts. Today, two principal roles for u.s. submarines, at least in any future war with the Soviet Union, are probably as anti-submarine weapons (attack submarines) and as strategic weapons platforms (ballistic missile submarines). Other missions, however, could include coastal defense, attacks on the enemy's surface fleet, projection of force ashore, and commerce warfare.1 The laws of war have never been comfortable with the submarine's unique combination of stealth and vulnerability. As will be explained below, it is this peculiar mix of strength and weakness that can be blamed as the root cause of the legal dilemma, particularly as it relates to the submarine's role as a commerce raider. The legal responses to this twentieth-century weapons platform have ranged from early proposals for its abolition to justification of its use under the rules of reprisal to tolerance of it as an effective war machine with characteristics that regrettably require some adjustments in the traditional laws of war. The U.s. Navy's new Commander's Handbook on the Law of Naval Operations (NWP 9) includes references to the laws of naval warfare that specifically address the submarine weapons system and also rules that apply, or can apply, to submarines and their roles in wartime.
    [Show full text]
  • Navy Shipbuilding: Prospects for Building a Larger Fleet
    Navy Shipbuilding: Prospects for Building a Larger Fleet January 15, 2021 Presentation at the Surface Navy Association’s 33rd Annual Symposium Eric J. Labs Senior Analyst for Naval Forces and Weapons National Security Division For further information about the venue, see https://navysnaevents.org/national-symposium. CBO’s Relevant Reports 1 Prospects for Building a Larger Fleet . The Navy’s New Shipbuilding Plan . The New Shipbuilding Plan in Historical Context . The Challenges of Building a Larger Fleet 2 The Navy’s New Shipbuilding Plan 3 The Future Naval Forces Study’s Larger and More Distributed Fleet 2016 FSA FNFS Ship Type Inventory Goals Inventory Goals Difference Aircraft Carriers 12 8 to 11 -1 to -4 Light Carriers 0 0 to 6 0 to 6 Ballistic Missile Submarines 12 12 0 Attack and Large Payload Submarines 66 72 to 78 6 to 12 Large Surface Combatants 104 73 to 88 -16 to -31 Small Surface Combatants 52 60 to 67 8 to 15 Large Amphibious Warfare Ships 12 9 to 10 -2 to -3 Small Amphibious Warfare Ships 26 52 to 57 26 to 31 Logistics and Support Ships 71 96 to 117 25 to 46 Unmanned Surface Vehicles n.a. 119 to 166 n.a. Unmanned Underwater Vehicles n.a. 24 to 76 n.a. Total Manned Ships 355 382 to 446 27 to 91 Total Unmanned Systems n.a. 143 to 242 n.a. Total Manned and Unmanned 355 525 to 688 170 to 333 FNFS = Future Naval Forces Study; FSA = Force Structure Assessment; n.a. = not applicable. 4 Ship Purchases Under the Navy’s Fiscal Year 2020 and December 2020 Shipbuilding Plans Ship Type Fiscal Year 2020 Plan December 2020 Plan Difference Aircraft Carriers 7 6 -1 Light Carriers 0 0 0 Ballistic Missile Submarines 12 11 -1 Attack and Large Payload Submarines 66 81 15 Large Surface Combatants 76 55 -21 Small Surface Combatants 58 76 18 Large Amphibious Warfare Ships 28 16 -12 Small Amphibious Warfare Ships 0 55 55 Logistics and Support Ships 57 104 47 Unmanned Surface Vehicles n.a.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunline Autumn07.Qxd 24/8/07 14:43 Page 1
    Gunline Autumn07.qxd 24/8/07 14:43 Page 1 Gunline - The First Point of Contact Published by the Royal Fleet Auxiliary Service August 2007 www.rfa.mod.uk Inside this RFA SUPPORT! Issue... Remembering the Falklands Page 11 RFA Lyme Bay is welcomed Page 5 Sir Jim visits Mounts Bay Page 16 Wave Ruler visits Anguilla Page 7 Farewell Captain Roach Page 4 day out for the crew of RFA CARDIGAN BAY. She is the 3rd of the Bay Class and the 2nd to have been built in AGovan Ship Yard, Glasgow, Scotland. The ship left the Yard in early August and spent the rest of 2006 and early 2007, developing herself and crew into an operational capable platform. Formally welcomed to the Fleet on 6 March 2007 follow her story from launch to operational deployment. See Page 3 Gunline Autumn07.qxd 22/8/07 13:38 Page 2 2 - Gunline From the Commodore… his edition of Gunline follows hard on the comprehensive, vastly improved and much more tailored, initial training heels of the last and perhaps that is no bad courses now being delivered at RALEIGH. We will continue to do this with Tthing, for there are several items of news full STCW and VQ accreditation. SULTAN has recently gained similar that you need to be aware of. I will pick up the accreditation for the Engineering ratings courses and we will see more of this threads of my last article using our vision and in the near future. COLLINGWOOD continues to develop and deliver values and set some of the latest news into the excellent initial training packages, fully accredited and designed specifically context of development.
    [Show full text]
  • REPORT 150 STC 19 E Rev. 1
    SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE (STC) NATO ANTI-SUBMARINE WARFARE: REBUILDING CAPABILITY, PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE Special Report by Leona ALLESLEV (Canada) Special Rapporteur 150 STC 19 E rev. 1 fin | Original: English | 13 October 2019 150 STC 19 E TABLE OF CONTENT I. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................... 1 II. THE IMPORTANCE OF THE SEA FOR THE ALLIANCE ...................................................... 2 III. THE RUSSIAN SUBMARINE THREAT TO NATO ................................................................. 3 A. SUBMARINES IN RUSSIA’S STRATEGY .................................................................... 3 B. THE STATE OF RUSSIA’S SUBMARINE FLEET ......................................................... 6 IV. A VIEW TOWARDS EAST ASIA ............................................................................................ 8 A. RECENT CHINESE DEVELOPMENTS ........................................................................ 8 B. NASCENT NORTH KOREAN CAPABILITIES ............................................................ 11 V. ALLIED ASW CAPABILITY SHORTFALLS AND ONGOING MODERNISATION ................ 11 A. THE OVERALL STATE OF ALLIED ASW CAPABILITIES .......................................... 11 B. TACTICAL SUBMARINES: HIGH QUALITY, MIXED PICTURE OVERALL ................ 13 C. MARITIME PATROL AIRCRAFT: A KEY SHORTFALL AREA .................................... 14 D. ONGOING FRIGATE MODERNISATION ACROSS THE ALLIANCE ........................
    [Show full text]