Implementation Plan - Update December 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Implementation Plan - Update December 2020 Corridor Information Document - Implementation Plan - Update December 2020 “RFC North Sea – Med is co-financed by the European Union's CEF. The sole responsibility of this publication lies with the author. The European Union is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information contained therein” CID Implementation Plan – 01/01/2021 Version Control Version Chapter changed Changes 20/11/2020 Review 1 Permanent - Based on the last final version published team (TT 2020); - Extension from Ghent to Terneuzen as connecting line in 2019; - With the withdrawal of the United Kingdom out of the European Union, and by consequence the leave as members of Network Rail and Eurotunnel, the content of this book has been adapted accordingly. 27/11/2020 Review 2 - Changes have been made on the basis of Management Board the input and comments provided by the for review by members of the Management Board; Executive Board and - This version has been sent to the in parallel Executive Board members for review; Stakeholder - In parallel, this reviewed version has been consultation sent out for stakeholder consultation. 10/12/2020 Final Draft - Changes have been made on the basis of the input and comments provided by the members of the Executive Board; - Changes have been made on the basis of comments received during the Stakeholder consultation. 17/12/2020 Final version The final version has been approved by approved by the the Executive Board for publication on the Executive board for website on 01/01/2021. publication on the website 01/01/2021 Publication on the website CID Implementation Plan – 01/01/2021 2 of 44 Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 KEY PARAMETERS OF CORRIDOR LINES ........................................................................................................... 6 2.1.1 Routes and Lines ............................................................................................................................... 6 2.1.2 Number of tracks .............................................................................................................................. 9 2.1.3 Speed limits ..................................................................................................................................... 11 2.1.4 Electrical systems ............................................................................................................................ 12 2.1.5 Signalling systems ........................................................................................................................... 14 2.1.6 Maximum axle load ........................................................................................................................ 14 2.1.7 Train length ..................................................................................................................................... 16 2.1.8 Loading Gauges .............................................................................................................................. 18 2.1.9 Gradients ........................................................................................................................................ 21 2.1.10 Connections with Other Corridors .............................................................................................. 23 2.1.10.1 Connection points with other Corridors ................................................................................................ 23 2.1.10.2 Contiguous Traffic Flows with other Corridors ...................................................................................... 23 2.1.10.3 RFC Rhine Alpine .................................................................................................................................... 23 2.1.10.4 RFC Atlantic ............................................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.10.5 RFC Mediterranean ................................................................................................................................ 23 2.1.10.6 RFC North Sea - Baltic ............................................................................................................................ 24 2.1.10.7 RFC Rhine-Danube ................................................................................................................................. 24 2.1.10.8 Multiple Corridor Flows ......................................................................................................................... 24 2.2 CORRIDOR TERMINALS .............................................................................................................................. 24 2.3 BOTTLENECKS .......................................................................................................................................... 24 2.4 RFC GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................................... 25 3. MARKET ANALYSIS STUDY ..................................................................................................................... 26 4. LIST OF MEASURES ................................................................................................................................ 27 4.1 COORDINATION OF PLANNED TEMPORARY CAPACITY RESTRICTIONS ................................................................... 27 4.2 CORRIDOR ONE STOP SHOP ....................................................................................................................... 27 4.3 CAPACITY ALLOCATION PRINCIPLES .............................................................................................................. 27 4.4 APPLICANTS ............................................................................................................................................ 27 4.5 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT ............................................................................................................................ 27 4.6 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT IN THE EVENT OF DISTURBANCE ................................................................................. 27 4.7 QUALITY EVALUATION ............................................................................................................................... 27 4.7.1 Performance Monitoring Report ..................................................................................................... 27 4.8 CORRIDOR INFORMATION DOCUMENT ......................................................................................................... 28 5. OBJECTIVES / PERFORMANCE ................................................................................................................ 29 5.1 TRAIN PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT: A CORRIDOR ORIENTED PERFORMANCE SCHEME ......................................... 29 5.2 PUNCTUALITY OBJECTIVES.......................................................................................................................... 29 5.3 CAPACITY OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 30 5.3.1 Trains running on the Corridor ........................................................................................................ 30 5.3.2 Strategy for the number of Pre-arranged Paths ............................................................................. 30 5.3.3 Planned Average Speed of Corridor Capacity Objectives ................................................................ 31 CID Implementation Plan – 01/01/2021 3 of 44 5.4 ALLOCATION OBJECTIVES ........................................................................................................................... 32 5.5 PERFORMANCE MONITORING ..................................................................................................................... 33 5.5.1 Harmonisation of Measurements across Corridors ........................................................................ 34 5.5.2 Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................................................ 34 5.5.2.1 Other Measurements ............................................................................................................................. 35 5.5.3 User Satisfaction Survey.................................................................................................................. 36 6. INDICATIVE INVESTMENT PLAN ............................................................................................................. 37 6.1 CAPACITY MANAGEMENT PLAN .................................................................................................................. 37 6.1.1 Projects ........................................................................................................................................... 37 6.1.1.1 Lyon Railway Node (NFL) ....................................................................................................................... 37 6.1.1.2 Flyover Oude Landen ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • CALENDRIER DES MANIFESTATIONS Sites Semi-Naturels Et Naturels En Ville D’Aubange
    2021 CALENDRIER DES MANIFESTATIONS Sites semi-naturels et naturels en Ville d’Aubange Au seuil de cette nouvelle année, le Syndicat d’Initiative d’Aubange vous présente ses meilleurs vœux. Ce calendrier est un outil que vous aurez à cœur d’utiliser et de conserver précieusement. Le syndicat d’initiative remercie les annonceurs et les associations qui ont contribué à sa réalisation. Il remercie également G. Schmidt, A. Remacle et C. Waltener pour la mise à disposition des photos, ainsi que le service infographie de la Ville d’Aubange pour la mise en page. Editeur responsable : Christian Binet SYNDICAT D’INITIATIVE D’AUBANGE Rue de Clémarais 28 A, B-6790 AUBANGE [email protected] - www.visitaubange.be Les manifestations présentées peuvent être modifiées, reportées ou annulées en fonction des restrictions gouvernementales en vi- gueur (voir notre site internet). L’orée du bois Le Chenoi et son vallon bocager donnant sur Rachecourt (zone d’intérêt paysager) JANVIER | Les Griechten à Guerlange, colonisés par des saules, ravins étroits où s’écoulent les eaux pluviales 1 vendredi 2 samedi 3 dimanche 4 lundi Prise de commande de 09 à 11h 5 mardi Aubange : Club de marche « La Fourmi » et S.I. AUBANGE : Promenade « Rando-Dé- Ouvert du lundi au samedi de 10h à 15h couverte », Willancourt, 10 km, départ place abbé Michel Gigi, à 13h30. 6 mercredi 7 jeudi 8 vendredi Battincourt : Harmonie Royale « Les Échos de la Batte » : Reprise des répétitions HREB. Aubange : Chorale « Les Choeurs de Lorraine » : Reprise des répétitions à 20h15. 9 samedi 10 dimanche Aix-sur-Cloie : Service Cohésion sociale : « Repair café » à la maison de quartier, rue Reiffenberg de 9h à 12h.
    [Show full text]
  • Intermodal Services a Family Company 4 Caring for Your Business
    BELGIUM INTERMODAL SERVICES A FAMILY COMPANY 4 CARING FOR YOUR BUSINESS 6 WHY MSC INTERMODAL SERVICES IN BELGIUM TABLE OF 8 & TRUCK SOLUTIONS CONTENTS 10 RAIL SOLUTIONS 12 BARGE SOLUTIONS 14 CONTACTS 520 155 VESSELS COUNTRIES 200 493 ROUTES OFFICES 500 70,000 PORTS OF CALL MSC GROUP EMPLOYEES 21 MILLION TEU CARRIED ANNUALLY A FAMILY COMPANY CARING FOR YOUR BUSINESS MSC is, above all, a family company with strong values and a deep MSC is a world leader in global transportation and is part of the MSC Group shipping heritage dating back fifty years. Despite our global presence shipping conglomerate, a global business engaged in the transport and logistics and large-scale operations, we understand that each of our customers sector. The Group encompasses a Cargo Division with MSC Mediterranean has different needs, so we go the extra mile to find tailor-made solutions. Shipping Company (MSC), Terminal Investment Limited (TiL), MEDLOG and a Passenger Division led by MSC Cruises and complemented by Mediterranean Founded by Captain Gianluigi Aponte, MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company passenger ferries with Grandi Navi Veloci (GNV) and SNAV. (MSC) is a privately-owned shipping line founded in 1970 and headquartered in Geneva (Switzerland) since 1978. The company’s international headquarters supervise a worldwide network of 493 offices, each of which is responsible for commercial and operational activities in their respective countries. 4 A FAMILY COMPANY CARING FOR YOUR BUSINESS INTERMODAL SERVICES 5 WHY MSC? As a leader in transport and logistics, MSC reaches every corner of the globe. Our fleet is among the most modern in the world, and we invest in state-of-the-art We bring your cargo safely and quickly from A to B, using tailor-made end-to-end equipment and technology to transport your cargo securely and efficiently to transport solutions across road, rail and sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Extensions of the TEN-T Core Network Corridors by Country: A
    Connecting Europe Facility – Annex I (Transport) Extension of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) With the CEF Regulation (Annex I), the Commission proposes to adapt the Trans-European core network corridor - to ensure better connectivity of core ports and cross-border projects. The extension reflects progress already made in developing the TEN-T core network, the corridor work plans of the European Coordinators and in-depth consultations with Member States. Moreover, the Commission proposes to simplify the list of pre-identified sections for each of the corridors. There will be a clear focus on cross-border sections, in line with a higher co-funding rate as proposed in the Regulation. Next to the core network, the Commission proposes to complement the development of the infrastructure with sections of the comprehensive networks in specific cases: cross-border links, including with third countries. The list of pre-identified comprehensive sections is included in Annex I. Extensions of the TEN-T core network corridors by country: a. Finland: the corridor network in Finland so far extends to only around 40% of the rail core network. Proposed extension of the North-Sea Baltic Corridor will connect the Finnish rail network with the Swedish core port of Luleå. The latter is currently not included in the corridor network. The proposed extension anticipates growing importance of the Arctic policy. b. Sweden: the corridor network in Sweden so far extends to only around 40% of the rail core network. The proposed extension of the Scandinavian-Mediterranean Corridor will connect with the Swedish core ports of Luleå in Sweden and Narvik in Norway.
    [Show full text]
  • Transport Situation in Belgium in 2006 1. Traffic
    TRANSPORT SITUATION IN BELGIUM IN 2006 1. TRAFFIC TRENDS Passenger traffic in general As car ownership remains among the highest in the world, congestion - still mild by international comparison - is getting worse around the cities. However, due to attempts at a more sustainable mobility, all modes of public transport are growing steadily. - Continual growth in the number of rail passengers, as in other forms of public transport, due to government efforts at a modal shift for commuters and a more attractive commercial attitude of the rail road company NMBS/SNCB. In 2005 global traffic grew by 5% to a record number of 173,4 mio rail passengers; for 2006 a corresponding pace of growth was noted. - Record numbers of passengers were also registered for the Brussels metro, bus and tramway-operator MIVB/STIB as well as for the regional bus and tramway-operators De Lijn and TEC. The sale of motorized two-wheeled vehicles is up and the cycling culture keeps going strong in the northern part of the country, while there is a growing interest in Brussels and Wallonia. The number of air passenger continues to grow after a previous dip. International rail transport by HST is successful and growing steadily. Freight transport in general: Overall traffic volumes are up in 2006 and - given the growth in the world economy (e.g. in China, Brazil, India) - volumes are expected to continue to grow in all modes; Containerisation of freight continues at a steady pace, resulting in impressive traffic growth in the seaports of Antwerp and Zeebrugge. Growth in inland transport demand remains primarily attracted towards road haulage (+- 75%): because of the advantages it still offers in terms of flexibility, reliability and price it is favoured over railroad (+-11%) and inland navigation(+-14%).
    [Show full text]
  • Fourth Work Plan of the European Coordinator Iveta Radičová AUGUST 2020
    Mediterranean Fourth Work Plan of the European Coordinator Iveta Radičová AUGUST 2020 Mobility and Transport AUGUST 2020 This report represents the opinion of the European Coordinator and does not prejudice the official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for any potential use which may be made of the information contained herein Table of Content 1 Towards the Mediterranean Corridor 4th Work Plan .................................... 6 1.1 Introduction .......................................................................................... 6 1.2 Achievements along the Corridor since 2014 ............................................. 7 2 Characteristics of the Mediterranean Corridor ........................................... 9 2.1 Alignment ............................................................................................. 9 2.2 Compliance 2019 and 2030 with the technical infrastructure parameters of the TEN-T guidelines by 2030 ................................................................ 10 2.3 Compliance maps ................................................................................ 13 2.4 Persisting bottlenecks and missing links .................................................. 17 3 Transport Market Study ........................................................................ 20 3.1 Current flows along the Corridor ...........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Border Projects : Stimulate Sustainable Cultural Exchanges
    : Cross-border projects : stimulate sustainable cultural exchanges © Timetravelturtle • Access to culture • Internationalisation • Tourism • Well-being • Intercultural dialogue • Civic participation Context The greater region is a cross-border area encompassing political and administrative entities from four different states: the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, the French Lorraine region, the German federal states of Saarland and Rhineland-Palatinate, and the Belgian Wallonia region, Wallonia-Brussels Federation and the German-speaking Community. Approximately 11.2 million people live on this territory stretched over 65,401 square kilometres, and more than 200,000 regional workers cross borders every day within the greater region. This transborder space features a dense urban, industrial and rural fabric. Continuous economic and cultural exchanges emanating from such an intersection of trade routes and transport networks represent a source of wealth and a basis for sustainable relationships between regions. Crucially, this geographical peculiarity provides the greater region with a cultural richness based on the diversity of nationalities, languages, and traditions and a shared heritage of mixed Latin and Germanic influences. Transborder cooperation is pivotal in this regard, for its economic and institutional development but also for the development of civil society in a cohesive way. In 1995 the city of Luxembourg was granted the title of European Capital of Culture (ECoC) which gave a dynamic impulse to the cultural landscape of the Grand Duchy, stimulating artistic training, heritage conservation and new ways of cultural participation. Approximately 1.1 million visitors came to Luxembourg throughout the year. In addition, the event contributed to raising awareness about the need to engage in a meaningful debate on culture and society and the benefits of culture for local development.
    [Show full text]
  • CFE Annual Report
    Annual Report 2009 129 th corporate financial year Proud of their many realisations, the teams of the CFE group are pleased to present the activity report for the year 2009. Compagnie d’Entreprises CFE SA Founded in Brussels on June 21, 1880 Headquarters: 42, avenue Herrmann-Debroux, 1160 Brussels – Belgium Company number 0400.464.795 RPM Brussels Telephone: +32 2 661 12 11 Fax: +32 2 660 77 10 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: http://www.cfe.be 1 Edito As expected, the CFE group’s 2009 revenue and profit came in below those of the previous year, when it achieved its best-ever perform- ance. However, the decline in revenue (€ -125 million), operating profit (€ -19.3 million) and net after-tax profit (€ -8.2 million) was modest against the backdrop of the global economic crisis. All divisions made a positive contribution to profit. DEME deserves special recognition for again demonstrating its ability to strengthen its position in the international dredging market, fully vindicating the substantial investments made in recent years to modernise its fleet. CFE has many strengths that enable it to weather the economic crisis and move confidently into 2010. The order book, standing at € 2,024 million, is satisfactory, although construction activity is likely to decline from the 2009 level. We intend to resist the temptation to take orders at any price, concentrating instead on profit. To do this, our recent international expansion, especially in Tunisia, holds out good prospects for repositioning our activity. CFE’s broad diversity of business lines and geographical locations is an additional asset, as is our sound financial position, which shields us from liquidity problems.
    [Show full text]
  • North Sea Stavoren Heerenveen Winschoten Veendam NETHERLANDS Assen Alkmaar Enkhuizen Steenwijk Emmen Hoorn N Meppel Hoogeveen
    B Western Europe BELGIUM, THE NETHERLANDS & LUXEMBOURG High speed line 1435 mm gauge (electrified) 1435 mm gauge, under electrification 1435 mm gauge, under construction (electrified) 1000 mm gauge, electrified Roodeschool Uithuizen Leeuwarden Delfzijl Harlingen Haven Groningen Hoogezand- Den Helder Sneek Sappemder Leer North Sea Stavoren Heerenveen Winschoten Veendam NETHERLANDS Assen Alkmaar Enkhuizen Steenwijk Emmen Hoorn N Meppel Hoogeveen IJmuiden Lelystad Kampen Amsterdam Zandvoort MariÎ nberg Haarlem Almere Zwolle Weesp Leiden Schiphol Hilversum Almelo Den Haag Breukelen Deventer Apeldoorn Oldenzaal Delft Hoek van Holland Amersfoort Osnabruck Hengelo Gouda Utrecht Enschede Zutphen Lochem Rotterdam Arnhem Geldermalsen Rhenen Ede Munster Zevenaar Elst Dordrecht Winterswijk Nijmegen Middelburg Lage-Zwaluwe Goes Vlissingen Roosendaal Breda 's-Hertogenbosch Zeebrugge Emmerich, Blankenberge Knokke Boxtel Dusseldorf, Koln Oostende Essen Tilburg Brecht Helmond De Panne Brugge Eeklo Eindhoven Turnhout St Niklaas Antwerpen Lokeren A.Berchem Venlo Lichtervelde Neerpelt Blerick Gent Puurs Herentals Poperinge Lier Mol Dendermonde Roermond Kortrijk Mechelen Monchengladbach, Aarschot Koln Oudenaarde Airport Genk Mouscron Brussels Geraardsbergen Leuven Hasselt Sittard Tournai Lille Ath Heerlen Halle Tongeren Monchengladbach Ottignies Maastricht Lille, Paris Landen London BELGIUM Montzen Aachen Quievrain Gembioux Duren, Koln Mons LiËge Namur Binche Eupen FRANCE Charleroi Verviers Jemeppe Rivage Aulnoye Spa Mariem- bourg Dinant Couvin Marloie GERMANY
    [Show full text]
  • Les Travaux Des Cfl En / Die Bauarbeiten Der Cfl Im Jahr / Cfl Engineering Works in 2020
    LES TRAVAUX DES CFL EN / DIE BAUARBEITEN DER CFL IM JAHR / CFL ENGINEERING WORKS IN 2020 Périodes de fermeture (temporaire) / ETTELBRUCK - TROISVIERGES Sperrungszeiten (vorübergehend) / Periods of closure (temporary): Avril Juin Juillet Septembre Octobre L M M J V S D 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Week-end / Wochenende / Weekends Liège 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Période importante / Längerer Zeitraum / Longer period of time 27 28 29 30 29 30 27 28 29 30 31 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 Gouvy Des bus de substitution seront mis en place pour ETTELBRUCK - DIEKIRCH toutes les périodes de fermeture. Février Mars Avril Mai Juin Ersatzbusse werden zur Abdeckung aller Sperrun- 1 2 1 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 gen eingerichtet. Troisvierges 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Establishment of a bus replacement service to com- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 pensate for the periods of closure.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Réseau GALA Est Une Collaboration Entre Les Terminaux De Genk, Anvers, Liege Et Athus
    WWW.GALA-NETWORK.BE Le réseau GALA est une collaboration entre les terminaux de Genk, Anvers, Liege et Athus. Ces 4 terminaux indépendants s’associent afin de pouvoir offrir une plus-value pour leurs clients, réaliser des synergies internes afin de créer une interoperabilité. Un réseau sans frontières Avec cette approche coordonnée nous cherchons avec nos clients les meilleures solutions, même en dehors de ce réseau. Le client choisit , le réseau s’étend The GALA-network represents a collaboration between Genk, Antwerp, Liege and Athus. These 4 independent terminals are grouped in order to offer an added value, generated by geared activities with a final intention to operate smoothly within and beyond the network boundaries. In such a way, the first ‘inland’ terminal has been created. Beyond the boundaries of the network With this co-ordinated approach, we are looking for the best solutions which could also go beyond the boundaries of the network. The customer chooses, the network develops itself. ATO ETG ATO est un terminal reconnu anversois, qui est issu d’une ETG stands for Euro Terminal Genk, strategically located in the joint-venture entre Boortmalt et IFB. Le terminal s’est dével- Genk-North zone ( Limburg province) oppé en peu de temps en spécialiste dans le traitement tri- The multimodal terminal is surrounded by the most important modal. La location fort stratégique garantit des solutions rapi- logistical companies and european distribution centers des et certaines pour tous transports dans le port d’Anvers. ETG est une abbreviation de Euro terminal Genk, idéalement situé ATO is a certified Antwerp terminal operator, founded by a joint dans la zonde Genk-Nord, dans la province de Limbourg venture between Boortmalt and IFB, and has recently grown into Ce terminal multimodal est entouré par de nombreuses sociétés a specialist in tri-modal handling! The strong strategic location logistiques plusieurs centres de distributions européennes guarantees speedy and reliable solutions to all transport demands in the Port of Antwerp.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Project Contribution to the Common European Transport Space
    Individual project contribution to the Common european transport space Papadimitriou, Stratos Chlomoudis, Costas Koliousis, Ioannis Department of Maritime Studies University of Piraeus Today’s agenda .Introduction –the general context .A single European Transport Area .The Connecting Europe Facility .The Corridors: Introduction and how these contribute to the general concept .Q+A Introduction . The transport industry is globalized (in terms of functional, business and regulatory terms) . But also has local issues to address (administrative procedures, customs, taxation, immigration, safety and security, waste, health protection,…) . EU has a vision to automate, improve and upgrade the industry A single European transport area 1. A true internal market for rail services 2. Completion of the single European sky 3. Capacity and quality of airports 4. A framework for inland navigation 5. Road freight issues 6. Multimodal transport of goods: e‐Freight Create the appropriate framework to allow for tracing goods in real time, ensure intermodal liability and promote clean freight transport Promoting a European maritime transport area without barriers • Unlike road transport, which has been reaping the benefits of the internal market since 1993, shipments of goods by sea between the ports of the European Union are treated in the same way as shipments to third countries. • Maritime transport between Member States red tape (many documentary checks and physical inspections by the customs, health, veterinary, plant health and immigration control,
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 TEN-T Performance Report
    Trans-European Road Network, TEN-T (Roads): 2019 Performance Report CEDR Working Group 3.5 Performance October 2020 Prepared by: CEDR WORKING GROUP PERFORMANCE (3.5) Group leader Jan Pettersson Sweden Group members Roman Limbach Germany Lukas Kerbler Austria Vesa Mannisto Finland Horvath Balazs Janos Hungary Pier Paolo Cartolano Italy Sandro La Monica Italy Jenne van der Velde Netherlands Randi Harnes Norway Grzegorz Obara Poland Anton Svigelj Slovenia Kenneth Natanaelsson Sweden Yan Cerf Switzerland Nurettin Cirakli United Kingdom - England Other contributors Niels Groenen Belgium - Flanders Eric thor Straten Denmark Mehis Leigri Estonia Hartmut Treichel Germany G. Pétur Matthíasson Iceland Cormac Synnott Ireland Modestas Lukošiūnas Lithuania Paul Mangen Luxembourg Robert Zerafa Malta Peter Schout Netherlands Piotr Ostaszewski Poland Luis Gómez Diez-Madroñero Spain Approved by: CEDR’s EXECUTIVE BOARD on 26 October 2020 Edited and published by: CEDR's Secretariat-General CEDR report: TR2020-01 ISBN: 979-10-93321-54-7 Disclaimer: This document expresses the current position of CEDR. It does not necessarily represent the views of individual member countries and should not be considered the official position of member countries. Trans-European Road Network, TEN-T (Roads): 2019 Performance Report Page 2 of 128 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 1 INTRODUCTION 11 1.1 The Trans-European Transport Network ........................................................................ 11 1.2 Background to the Performance Report ........................................................................
    [Show full text]