Ymdb: a Stress-Responsive Ribonuclease-Binding Regulator of E

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ymdb: a Stress-Responsive Ribonuclease-Binding Regulator of E Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press YmdB: a stress-responsive ribonuclease-binding regulator of E. coli RNase III activity Kwang-sun Kim, Robert Manasherob, and Stanley N. Cohen1 Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA The broad cellular actions of RNase III family enzymes include ribosomal RNA (rRNA) processing, mRNA decay, and the generation of noncoding microRNAs in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Here we report that YmdB, an evolutionarily conserved 18.8-kDa protein of Escherichia coli of previously unknown function, is a regulator of RNase III cleavages. We show that YmdB functions by interacting with a site in the RNase III catalytic region, that expression of YmdB is transcriptionally activated by both cold-shock stress and the entry of cells into stationary phase, and that this activation requires the ␴-factor-encoding gene, rpoS. We discovered that down-regulation of RNase III activity occurs during both stresses and is dependent on YmdB production during cold shock; in contrast, stationary-phase regulation was unperturbed in ymdB-null mutant bacteria, indicating the existence of additional, YmdB-independent, factors that dynamically regulate RNase III actions during normal cell growth. Our results reveal the previously unsuspected role of ribonuclease-binding proteins in the regulation of RNase III activity. [Keywords: Ribonuclease III; RpoS; cold shock; RNA decay; RNA processing] Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org. Received August 15, 2008; revised version accepted October 16, 2008. RNase III family ribonucleases, which cleave dsRNA to protein-coding RNAs (Murchison and Hannon 2004), yield 5Ј phosphate and 3Ј hydroxyl termini, are remark- and mRNAs that encode the exoribonuclease PNPase able for both the extent of their evolutionary conserva- (Pnp) (Régnier and Portier 1986), Rnc itself (Matsunaga et tion in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells and the diversity al. 1996a,b), or phage and plasmid proteins (Nicholson of their biological roles (Court 1993; Nicholson 2003; 1996, 2003). However, notwithstanding the multiplicity Drider and Condon 2004; MacRae and Doudna 2007). and breadth of functions of RNase III, rnc-null mutant E. Containing 226 amino acids, the 25.6-kDa peptide en- coli cells are viable and show no phenotypic abnormali- coded by the rnc gene of Escherichia coli (EC 3.1.26.3) is ties except for a slightly impeded rate of growth structurally the least complex and functionally perhaps (Babitzke et al. 1993) and minimally defective transla- the most extensively studied RNase III family member. tion of certain mRNAs (Talkad et al. 1978). Rnc monomers, which include an N-terminal catalytic The first suggestion that the ribonucleolytic actions of domain and a C-terminal dsRNA-binding domain RNase III may be regulated came from the observation (dsRBD) (Nashimoto and Uchida 1985), dimerize to form by Makarov and Apirion in 1992 that extracts of E. coli the enzymatically active protein (Dunn 1982; Nicholson cells contain an ∼17-kDa protein that can inhibit in vitro 2003). RNase III-dependent processing of p10Sa RNA (Makarov E. coli RNase III was first identified by its ability to and Apirion 1992)—a 10Sa RNA precursor (also known catalyze cleavage of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) precursors as ssrA RNA and tmRNA) that has an important role in during ribosome biogenesis (for review, see Dunn 1982). the recycling of ribosomes from defective mRNAs (Rich- Subsequently, this enzyme has been shown to mediate ards et al. 2008). However, the nature of this RNase III- the maturation and/or degradation of a variety of tran- inhibiting moiety and its possible biological role(s) has scripts, including tRNA precursors (Régnier and Grun- remained obscure for almost two decades. Using a func- berg-Manago 1989), conditionally expressed small non- tion-based screen to identify genes encoding proteins that regulate endonucleolytic cleavages by RNase III in vivo, we discovered a highly conserved bacterial protein YmdB that inhibits RNase III actions by binding to the 1Corresponding author. region required for dimerization/activation of the en- E-MAIL [email protected]; FAX (650) 725-1536. zyme. We show that production of YmdB and the con- Article is online at http://www.genesdev.org/cgi/doi/10.1101/gad.1729508. Freely available online through the Genes & Development Open Access sequent inhibition of RNase III function are modulated option. in response to cellular and environmental stresses. Our GENES & DEVELOPMENT 22:3497–3508 © 2008 by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press ISSN 0890-9369/08; www.genesdev.org 3497 Downloaded from genesdev.cshlp.org on October 2, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Kim et al. results reveal a novel mechanism for the dynamic regu- cifically from inhibition of Rnc activity was confirmed lation of ribonuclease activity by alterations in cell using PL-putL-lac fusion transcripts, which are attacked physiology. at a site immediately 3Ј of putL to generate an 80-nucleo- tide (nt) product (Sloan et al. 2007); turn on of the YmdB Results expression led to accumulation of the 140-nt unproc- essed transcript and concurrent reduction of the 80-nt Screening of RNase III regulators in E. coli RNase III cleavage product (Fig. 1C). To identify trans-acting regulators of RNase III activity, Inhibition of RNase III cleavages by purified His-tagged we introduced a library of plasmid-borne E. coli genes YmdB protein was demonstrated biochemically in vitro [the ASKA library, which includes all known E. coli and the inhibition was shown to be dependent quantita- ORFs expressed from an IPTG-inducible promoter tively on YmdB using R1.1 RNA (60 nt in size), a small (Kitagawa et al. 2005), into an E. coli strain (RS7305) RNase III substrate containing a sequence that is the site containing a single copy of a rncЈ-ЈlacZ reporter gene of RNase III-mediated processing of the phage T7 poly- fusion (Matsunaga et al. 1996a)]. Earlier work has shown cistronic early mRNA precursor (Fig. 1D; Amarasinghe that RNase III cleaves its own transcript, and conse- et al. 2001). The distinctly different YmdB/RNase III ra- quently that ␤-galactosidase production from this fusion tios found to affect RNase III activity in vivo and in vitro construct is increased approximately ninefold in cells imply that experimental conditions employed for the in containing a missense mutation that decreases RNase III vitro assays do not entirely mimic the physiological activity (Matsunaga et al. 1996a,b). We reasoned that state. cleavage of the rncЈ-ЈlacZ transcript would also be af- fected by down-regulators of Rnc activity encoded by YmdB interaction with RNase III ASKA library ORFs. Regulation of expression of ␤-galac- tosidase from the rncЈ-ЈlacZ fusion was monitored col- Notwithstanding the ability of YmdB to inhibit RNase orimetrically on MacConkey-Lac and S-gal plates as de- III-mediated cleavage of R1.1 RNA, gel shift analysis scribed in the Materials and Methods. Two colonies that failed to detect binding of YmdB to this substrate. In- showed reproducibly increased color intensity on culture stead, multiple lines of evidence indicated that YmdB plates containing IPTG were obtained and the phenotype interacts with the RNase III protein. This interaction was confirmed. Sequence analysis of ASKA inserts in was suggested initially by our detection of an RNase III- ∼ plasmids isolated from these colonies identified ymdB sized 26 kDa protein, using rabbit polyclonal antibody (b1045), which is located at the 23.82-min position of the generated against E. coli RNase III, in histidine-tagged 2+ E. coli chromosome and encodes a putative 177-amino- YmdB preparations purified by Ni column chromatog- + acid 18.88-kDa protein of previously unknown function raphy from rnc —but not from rnc mutant—bacteria (Swiss-Prot P0A8D6). Swiss-Prot database analysis of the (data not shown). More direct evidence of the ability of putative YmdB protein indicates that amino acids 1–175 YmdB and RNase III to interact was obtained in experi- comprise a macro (A1pp) domain characteristic of Appr- ments showing that biotin-tagged YmdB preparations 1Љ-p processing family proteins, which catalyze the con- purified by a streptavidin bead-binding procedure (see version of ADP-ribose-1Љ-monophosphate (Appr-1Љ-p) to Materials and Methods) also included an RNase III-size ADP-ribose in eukaryotes (Culver et al. 1994). protein detected on Western blots by RNase III antibody (Fig. 2A). The observed copurification of this protein with biotin-tagged YmdB was unaffected by treatment of Effect of YmdB on cleavage of RNase III targeted YmdB with ribonuclease A (+ vs. −), implying that inter- transcripts action of this protein with RNase III does not require an Addition of IPTG to cultures of bacteria expressing the RNA intermediate. Independently of these results, high- ASKA library-derived plasmid-borne ymdB insert under throughput MALDI-TOF screening (Butland et al. 2005) control of the plac promoter increased production of a of protein complexes isolated from E. coli cells has iden- protein migrating in polyacrylamide gels at the position tified YmdB in protein complexes containing RNase III expected for YmdB (Fig. 1A, left). This increase was as- (A. Emili, pers. comm.). sociated with reduced cleavage of transcripts containing Physical interaction between YmdB and RNase III in RNase III targeted sites in rnc and pnp mRNAs fused to vivo was further confirmed and the RNase III segment lacZ (Matsunaga et al. 1996a; Beran and Simons 2001) as required for the interaction was identified by analysis, in evaluated quantitatively by measuring ␤-galactosidase cells mutated in the chromosomal rnc gene, of truncated activity encoded by lacZ (Fig. 1A, middle). Using purified RNase III proteins expressed from the pKSC1-Rnc plas- RNase III and YmdB to quantify the cellular levels of mids and captured by YmdB attached to streptavidin- these proteins in vivo by Western blotting, we determined coated beads (Fig.
Recommended publications
  • Supplemental Methods
    Supplemental Methods: Sample Collection Duplicate surface samples were collected from the Amazon River plume aboard the R/V Knorr in June 2010 (4 52.71’N, 51 21.59’W) during a period of high river discharge. The collection site (Station 10, 4° 52.71’N, 51° 21.59’W; S = 21.0; T = 29.6°C), located ~ 500 Km to the north of the Amazon River mouth, was characterized by the presence of coastal diatoms in the top 8 m of the water column. Sampling was conducted between 0700 and 0900 local time by gently impeller pumping (modified Rule 1800 submersible sump pump) surface water through 10 m of tygon tubing (3 cm) to the ship's deck where it then flowed through a 156 µm mesh into 20 L carboys. In the lab, cells were partitioned into two size fractions by sequential filtration (using a Masterflex peristaltic pump) of the pre-filtered seawater through a 2.0 µm pore-size, 142 mm diameter polycarbonate (PCTE) membrane filter (Sterlitech Corporation, Kent, CWA) and a 0.22 µm pore-size, 142 mm diameter Supor membrane filter (Pall, Port Washington, NY). Metagenomic and non-selective metatranscriptomic analyses were conducted on both pore-size filters; poly(A)-selected (eukaryote-dominated) metatranscriptomic analyses were conducted only on the larger pore-size filter (2.0 µm pore-size). All filters were immediately submerged in RNAlater (Applied Biosystems, Austin, TX) in sterile 50 mL conical tubes, incubated at room temperature overnight and then stored at -80oC until extraction. Filtration and stabilization of each sample was completed within 30 min of water collection.
    [Show full text]
  • Nucleotide Sequence Surrounding a Ribonuclease III Processing Site In
    Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 74, No. 3, pp. 984-988, March 1977 Biochemistry Nucleotide sequence surrounding a ribonuclease III processing site in bacteriophage T7 RNA (intercistronic region/polycistronic mRNA precursor/hairpin structure/endoribonuclease III) MARTIN ROSENBERG* AND RICHARD A. KRAMERt f * Laboratory of Molecular Biology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20014; and t Department of Biochemistry, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305 Communicated by Charles Yanofsky, January 3, 1977 ABSTRACT We have determined a nucleotide sequence of the 5' end of the gene 0.7 mRNAs, (ii) some fragments that 87 residues surrounding a ribonuclease III (endoribonuclease contain the RNase III cleavage site are not recognized and III; EC 3.1.4.24) processing site in the bacteriophage 17 inter- cistronic region between early genes 0.3 and 0.7. The structural cleaved by the enzyme; and (iii) the 3'-terminal oligoadenylate requirements necessary for proper recognition and cleavage by sequences found on the ends of the in vdvo T7 early mRNAs (11) RNase III are discussed. In addition, other structural features are not encoded by the genome, but presumably represent a characteristic of this intercistronic boundary are described. nontemplate-dependent post-transcriptional modification. Here, we report the complete nucleotide sequence of the gene When bacteriophage T7 infects Escherichia coli, the host RNA 0.3-0.7 intercistronic region of T7 and propose a specific role polymerase (RNA nucleotidyltransferase, EC 2.7.7.6) tran- for RNA secondary structure in substrate recognition and action scribes only the early region of the phage genome (i.e., leftmost of RNase III.
    [Show full text]
  • Generate Metabolic Map Poster
    Authors: Pallavi Subhraveti Ron Caspi Quang Ong Peter D Karp An online version of this diagram is available at BioCyc.org. Biosynthetic pathways are positioned in the left of the cytoplasm, degradative pathways on the right, and reactions not assigned to any pathway are in the far right of the cytoplasm. Transporters and membrane proteins are shown on the membrane. Ingrid Keseler Periplasmic (where appropriate) and extracellular reactions and proteins may also be shown. Pathways are colored according to their cellular function. Gcf_900114035Cyc: Amycolatopsis sacchari DSM 44468 Cellular Overview Connections between pathways are omitted for legibility.
    [Show full text]
  • Figure S1. Reverse Transcription‑Quantitative PCR Analysis of ETV5 Mrna Expression Levels in Parental and ETV5 Stable Transfectants
    Figure S1. Reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR analysis of ETV5 mRNA expression levels in parental and ETV5 stable transfectants. (A) Hec1a and Hec1a‑ETV5 EC cell lines; (B) Ishikawa and Ishikawa‑ETV5 EC cell lines. **P<0.005, unpaired Student's t‑test. EC, endometrial cancer; ETV5, ETS variant transcription factor 5. Figure S2. Survival analysis of sample clusters 1‑4. Kaplan Meier graphs for (A) recurrence‑free and (B) overall survival. Survival curves were constructed using the Kaplan‑Meier method, and differences between sample cluster curves were analyzed by log‑rank test. Figure S3. ROC analysis of hub genes. For each gene, ROC curve (left) and mRNA expression levels (right) in control (n=35) and tumor (n=545) samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrioid Cancer cohort are shown. mRNA levels are expressed as Log2(x+1), where ‘x’ is the RSEM normalized expression value. ROC, receiver operating characteristic. Table SI. Clinicopathological characteristics of the GSE17025 dataset. Characteristic n % Atrophic endometrium 12 (postmenopausal) (Control group) Tumor stage I 91 100 Histology Endometrioid adenocarcinoma 79 86.81 Papillary serous 12 13.19 Histological grade Grade 1 30 32.97 Grade 2 36 39.56 Grade 3 25 27.47 Myometrial invasiona Superficial (<50%) 67 74.44 Deep (>50%) 23 25.56 aMyometrial invasion information was available for 90 of 91 tumor samples. Table SII. Clinicopathological characteristics of The Cancer Genome Atlas Uterine Corpus Endometrioid Cancer dataset. Characteristic n % Solid tissue normal 16 Tumor samples Stagea I 226 68.278 II 19 5.740 III 70 21.148 IV 16 4.834 Histology Endometrioid 271 81.381 Mixed 10 3.003 Serous 52 15.616 Histological grade Grade 1 78 23.423 Grade 2 91 27.327 Grade 3 164 49.249 Molecular subtypeb POLE 17 7.328 MSI 65 28.017 CN Low 90 38.793 CN High 60 25.862 CN, copy number; MSI, microsatellite instability; POLE, DNA polymerase ε.
    [Show full text]
  • Monilinia Fructicola, Monilinia Laxa and Monilinia Fructigena, the Causal Agents of Brown Rot on Stone Fruits Rita M
    De Miccolis Angelini et al. BMC Genomics (2018) 19:436 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12864-018-4817-4 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access De novo assembly and comparative transcriptome analysis of Monilinia fructicola, Monilinia laxa and Monilinia fructigena, the causal agents of brown rot on stone fruits Rita M. De Miccolis Angelini* , Domenico Abate, Caterina Rotolo, Donato Gerin, Stefania Pollastro and Francesco Faretra Abstract Background: Brown rots are important fungal diseases of stone and pome fruits. They are caused by several Monilinia species but M. fructicola, M. laxa and M. fructigena are the most common all over the world. Although they have been intensively studied, the availability of genomic and transcriptomic data in public databases is still scant. We sequenced, assembled and annotated the transcriptomes of the three pathogens using mRNA from germinating conidia and actively growing mycelia of two isolates of opposite mating types per each species for comparative transcriptome analyses. Results: Illumina sequencing was used to generate about 70 million of paired-end reads per species, that were de novo assembled in 33,861 contigs for M. fructicola, 31,103 for M. laxa and 28,890 for M. fructigena. Approximately, 50% of the assembled contigs had significant hits when blasted against the NCBI non-redundant protein database and top-hits results were represented by Botrytis cinerea, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum and Sclerotinia borealis proteins. More than 90% of the obtained sequences were complete, the percentage of duplications was always less than 14% and fragmented and missing transcripts less than 5%. Orthologous transcripts were identified by tBLASTn analysis using the B.
    [Show full text]
  • Unknown Areas of Activity of Human Ribonuclease Dicer: a Putative Deoxyribonuclease Activity
    molecules Article Unknown Areas of Activity of Human Ribonuclease Dicer: A Putative Deoxyribonuclease Activity Marta Wojnicka , Agnieszka Szczepanska and Anna Kurzynska-Kokorniak * Department of Ribonucleoprotein Biochemistry, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, 61-704 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (M.W.); [email protected] (A.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 31 January 2020; Accepted: 17 March 2020; Published: 20 March 2020 Abstract: The Dicer ribonuclease plays a crucial role in the biogenesis of small regulatory RNAs (srRNAs) by processing long double-stranded RNAs and single-stranded hairpin RNA precursors into small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), respectively. Dicer-generated srRNAs can control gene expression by targeting complementary transcripts and repressing their translation or inducing their cleavage. Human Dicer (hDicer) is a multidomain enzyme comprising a putative helicase domain, a DUF283 domain, platform, a PAZ domain, a connector helix, two RNase III domains (RNase IIIa and RNase IIIb) and a dsRNA-binding domain. Specific, ~20-base pair siRNA or miRNA duplexes with 2 nucleotide (nt) 3’-overhangs are generated by Dicer when an RNA substrate is anchored within the platform-PAZ-connector helix (PPC) region. However, increasing number of reports indicate that in the absence of the PAZ domain, binding of RNA substrates can occur by other Dicer domains. Interestingly, truncated variants of Dicer, lacking the PPC region, have been found to display a DNase activity. Inspired by these findings, we investigated how the lack of the PAZ domain, or the entire PPC region, would influence the cleavage activity of hDicer. Using immunopurified 3xFlag-hDicer produced in human cells and its two variants: one lacking the PAZ domain, and the other lacking the entire PPC region, we show that the PAZ domain deletion variants of hDicer are not able to process a pre-miRNA substrate, a dsRNA with 2-nt 30-overhangs, and a blunt-ended dsRNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Insight Into the Domain Structure and Functions of Dicer-Type Ribonucleases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Genetic Insight into the Domain Structure and Functions of Dicer-Type Ribonucleases Kinga Ciechanowska, Maria Pokornowska and Anna Kurzy ´nska-Kokorniak* Department of Ribonucleoprotein Biochemistry, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (K.C.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-61-852-85-03 (ext. 1264) Abstract: Ribonuclease Dicer belongs to the family of RNase III endoribonucleases, the enzymes that specifically hydrolyze phosphodiester bonds found in double-stranded regions of RNAs. Dicer enzymes are mostly known for their essential role in the biogenesis of small regulatory RNAs. A typical Dicer-type RNase consists of a helicase domain, a domain of unknown function (DUF283), a PAZ (Piwi-Argonaute-Zwille) domain, two RNase III domains, and a double-stranded RNA binding domain; however, the domain composition of Dicers varies among species. Dicer and its homologues developed only in eukaryotes; nevertheless, the two enzymatic domains of Dicer, helicase and RNase III, display high sequence similarity to their prokaryotic orthologs. Evolutionary studies indicate that a combination of the helicase and RNase III domains in a single protein is a eukaryotic signature and is supposed to be one of the critical events that triggered the consolidation of the eukaryotic RNA interference. In this review, we provide the genetic insight into the domain organization and structure of Dicer proteins found in vertebrate and invertebrate animals, plants and fungi. We also discuss, in the context of the individual domains, domain deletion variants and partner proteins, a variety of Dicers’ functions not only related to small RNA biogenesis pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rnase III Family: a Conserved Structure and Expanding Functions in Eukaryotic Dsrna Metabolism
    Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. (2001) 3(4): 71-78. The Eukaryotic RNase III 71 The RNase III Family: A Conserved Structure and Expanding Functions in Eukaryotic dsRNA Metabolism Bruno Lamontagne, Stéphanie Larose, Jim Boulanger, family (Figure 1). In bacteria, RNase III exists in one form and Sherif Abou Elela* characterized by a classical RNA binding domain and a nuclease domain (Nicholson, 1999). In contrast, eukaryotic Département de Microbiologie et d’Infectiologie, Faculté RNase III exists in three isoforms that share the basic de Médecine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, dsRBD but differ in the number of nuclease domains and Québec, Canada J1H 5N4 in the composition of the N-terminal domain (Filippov et al., 2000; Jacobsen et al., 1999; Lamontagne et al., 2000). The first form contains three domains; the dsRBD, the Abstract nuclease domain, and an additional uniquely eukaryotic N-terminal domain required for correct protein conformation The last few years have witnessed the appreciation of and efficient RNA cleavage (Lamontagne et al., 2000). The dsRNA as a regulator of gene expression, a potential second form exhibits in addition to these three domains a antiviral agent, and a tumor suppressor. However, in second nuclease motif at the protein N-terminus (Wu et spite of these clear effects on the cell function, the al., 2000). Finally, the third form of eukaryotic RNase III mechanism that controls dsRNA maturation and contains in addition to the three main eukaryotic domains stability remains unknown. Recently, the discovery of a fourth distinct helicase domain (Jacobsen et al., 1999; eukaryotic orthologues of the bacterial dsRNA specific Rotondo and Frendewey, 1996).
    [Show full text]
  • Generate Metabolic Map Poster
    Authors: Pallavi Subhraveti Peter D Karp Ingrid Keseler An online version of this diagram is available at BioCyc.org. Biosynthetic pathways are positioned in the left of the cytoplasm, degradative pathways on the right, and reactions not assigned to any pathway are in the far right of the cytoplasm. Transporters and membrane proteins are shown on the membrane. Anamika Kothari Periplasmic (where appropriate) and extracellular reactions and proteins may also be shown. Pathways are colored according to their cellular function. Gcf_000817975Cyc: Azotobacter chroococcum NCIMB 8003 Cellular Overview Connections between pathways are omitted for legibility.
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Global Gene Expression Related to Starch, Lipid and Protein Composition
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2006 The na alysis of global gene expression related to starch, lipid and protein composition Ling Li Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Genetics Commons, and the Molecular Biology Commons Recommended Citation Li, Ling, "The na alysis of global gene expression related to starch, lipid and protein composition " (2006). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 1864. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/1864 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The analysis of global gene expression related to starch, lipid and protein composition by Ling Li A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Genetics Program of Study Committee: Eve Syrkin Wurtele, Major Professor Martin H. Spalding Mark E. Westgate Dan S. Nettleton Martha G. James Basil J. Nikolau Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2006 Copyright © Ling Li, 2006. All rights reserved. UMI Number: 3243820 Copyright 2007 by Li, Ling All rights reserved. UMI Microform 3243820 Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • 12) United States Patent (10
    US007635572B2 (12) UnitedO States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 7,635,572 B2 Zhou et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 22, 2009 (54) METHODS FOR CONDUCTING ASSAYS FOR 5,506,121 A 4/1996 Skerra et al. ENZYME ACTIVITY ON PROTEIN 5,510,270 A 4/1996 Fodor et al. MICROARRAYS 5,512,492 A 4/1996 Herron et al. 5,516,635 A 5/1996 Ekins et al. (75) Inventors: Fang X. Zhou, New Haven, CT (US); 5,532,128 A 7/1996 Eggers Barry Schweitzer, Cheshire, CT (US) 5,538,897 A 7/1996 Yates, III et al. s s 5,541,070 A 7/1996 Kauvar (73) Assignee: Life Technologies Corporation, .. S.E. al Carlsbad, CA (US) 5,585,069 A 12/1996 Zanzucchi et al. 5,585,639 A 12/1996 Dorsel et al. (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this 5,593,838 A 1/1997 Zanzucchi et al. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 5,605,662 A 2f1997 Heller et al. U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. 5,620,850 A 4/1997 Bamdad et al. 5,624,711 A 4/1997 Sundberg et al. (21) Appl. No.: 10/865,431 5,627,369 A 5/1997 Vestal et al. 5,629,213 A 5/1997 Kornguth et al. (22) Filed: Jun. 9, 2004 (Continued) (65) Prior Publication Data FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS US 2005/O118665 A1 Jun. 2, 2005 EP 596421 10, 1993 EP 0619321 12/1994 (51) Int. Cl. EP O664452 7, 1995 CI2O 1/50 (2006.01) EP O818467 1, 1998 (52) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2019/060903 Al 28 March 2019 (28.03.2019) W 1P O PCT
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2019/060903 Al 28 March 2019 (28.03.2019) W 1P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: #324, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (US). ZOMORODI, C12N 15/70 (2006.01) Sepehr; 1600 Jefferson Park Ave. #307, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903 (US). POURTAHERI, Payam; 4000 City (21) International Application Number: Walk Way #213, Charlottesville, Virginia 22902 (US). PCT/US20 18/052690 (74) Agent: HOLLY, David C. et al; 1299 Pennsylvania Av¬ (22) International Filing Date: enue NW, Suite 700, Washington, District of Columbia 25 September 2018 (25.09.2018) 20004-2400 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every (26) Publication Language: English kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, (30) Priority Data: CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, 62/562,723 25 September 2017 (25.09.2017) US DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, 62/666,981 04 May 2018 (04.05.2018) US HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, (71) Applicant: AGROSPHERES, INC. [US/US]; 1180 Semi¬ KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, nole Trail, Suite 100, Charlottesville, Virginia 22901 (US). MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, (72) Inventors: SHAKEEL, Ameer Hamza; 43 136 Shadow SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, Terrace, Leesburg, Virginia 20176 (US).
    [Show full text]