Inositol Phosphate in the Basidiomycete Fungus Schizophyllum Commune

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Inositol Phosphate in the Basidiomycete Fungus Schizophyllum Commune Inositol phosphate in the basidiomycete fungus Schizophyllum commune Dissertation To fulfill the Requirements for the Degree of „doctor rerum naturalium“ (Dr. rer. nat.) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Science of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Reyna Carmina Felicia Murry, MSc. born on the 22nd of October 1987 in Bandung, Indonesia First reviewer: Prof. Dr. Erika Kothe, Institut für Mikrobiologie, FSU Jena Second Reviewer: Prof. Dr. Axel A. Brakhage, Institut für Mikrobiologie, FSU Jena Third Reviewer: Prof. Dr. J. Stephen Horton, Department of Biological Sciences, Science and Engineering Center, Union College, Schenectady, New York, USA Date of public defense: 7th May 2019 “Science is the key to our future, and if you don't believe in science, then you're holding everybody back.” Bill Nye Table of Contents 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Schizophyllum commune .............................................................................................. 1 1.2 Fruiting body development in S. commune ................................................................. 3 1.3 Signal transduction: G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and Ras signaling .......... 4 1.4 Inositol-based metabolism and signaling: inositol phosphates and inositol lipids ...... 5 1.5 Inositol and inositol monophosphatase ........................................................................ 7 1.6 Inositol hexakisphosphate and the inositol phosphate kinases .................................... 8 1.7 Aim of the study .......................................................................................................... 8 2 Materials and methods ...................................................................................................... 10 2.1 Chemicals, reagents and enzymes ............................................................................. 10 2.2 Cultivation media ...................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Organisms, plasmids, and nucleotides ....................................................................... 11 2.4 Experiments with E. coli DH5α ................................................................................. 13 2.4.1 Growth conditions and production of electrocompetent cells ............................ 13 2.4.2 Transformation of E. coli DH5α ........................................................................ 13 2.5 Experiments with S. commune ................................................................................... 14 2.5.1 Cultivation of S. commune ................................................................................. 14 2.5.2 Growth rate measurement and dry weight determination .................................. 14 2.5.3 Rapid DNA isolation .......................................................................................... 14 2.5.4 DNA isolation using CTAB ............................................................................... 15 2.5.5 RNA isolation ..................................................................................................... 15 2.5.6 Quality, purity, and quantitation for DNA and RNA ......................................... 16 2.6 Inositol monophosphatase activity measurement ...................................................... 16 2.6.1 Crude extraction of S. commune ........................................................................ 16 2.6.2 Protein quantitation ............................................................................................ 16 2.6.3 Malachite Green assay ....................................................................................... 17 2.7 Protoplast preparation and transformation of S. commune an ................................... 17 I 2.8 Construction plasmid: imp overexpression for S. commune ...................................... 18 2.8.1 Yeast Recombination ......................................................................................... 18 2.8.2 Cultivation of S. cerevisiae BY4741, ∆LEU ...................................................... 19 2.8.3 Yeast transformation .......................................................................................... 20 2.8.4 Screening and validation of recombined product ............................................... 20 2.8.5 Cloning of tef1 promoter and imp gene to pTrp ................................................. 21 2.9 Proteome analysis using 2D-PAGE ........................................................................... 21 2.9.1 Cytosolic protein isolation ................................................................................. 21 2.9.2 First and second dimension of 2D gel electrophoresis ....................................... 22 2.9.3 Protein/ peptide analysis using MALDI TOF/MS-MS ...................................... 23 2.10 Signal protein analysis ............................................................................................... 24 2.10.1 Signal protein isolation and purification ............................................................ 24 2.10.2 LC-MS/MS analysis and protein database search .............................................. 25 2.11 Microscopy ................................................................................................................ 26 2.11.1 Stereomicroscopy and fluorescence microscopy ............................................... 26 2.11.2 Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy ............................................................... 26 2.12 Inositol phosphates profile analysis ........................................................................... 27 2.12.1 Radioactive labelling and extraction of inositol phosphates .............................. 27 2.12.2 HPLC run and detection using scintillation counter .......................................... 27 2.13 Other molecular biology methods ............................................................................. 28 2.13.1 Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) ...................................................................... 28 2.13.2 Real Time-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) ........................................................... 29 2.13.3 DNA restriction endonucleases .......................................................................... 29 2.13.4 DNA sequencing ................................................................................................ 29 2.13.5 Plasmid DNA preparation .................................................................................. 30 2.13.6 Determination of Protein Kinase C activity ....................................................... 30 2.14 In silico analysis ........................................................................................................ 30 2.14.1 Inferring phylogeny ............................................................................................ 30 2.14.2 Chromosomal organization of imp surrounding gene ........................................ 31 II 2.14.3 Other protein analysis ......................................................................................... 31 3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 32 3.1 Inositol phosphate in S. commune ............................................................................. 32 3.2 Inositol phosphate phosphatase and inositol phosphate kinases ............................... 34 3.3 Inositol phosphate kinases gene expression .............................................................. 36 3.4 Proteins involved in the development of S. commune ............................................... 37 3.5 Lithium effect on inositol phosphate in S. commune ................................................. 39 3.5.1 Lithium effect on the growth and mating in S. commune .................................. 39 3.5.2 Lithium effect on inositol phosphate and inositol monophosphatase activity ... 41 3.5.3 Lithium effect on S. commune metabolism and cellular signaling..................... 42 3.5.4 Lithium effect on actin dynamics ....................................................................... 44 3.6 Inositol monophosphatase and inositol monophosphatase-like gene family ............. 45 3.7 Inositol monophosphatase ......................................................................................... 46 3.8 Comparative genetic map of imp and surrounding genes .......................................... 48 3.9 Overexpression of inositol monophosphatase (imp) ................................................. 50 3.9.1 Validation of imp overexpression ...................................................................... 50 3.9.2 Characterization of imp overexpressing mutants ............................................... 51 3.9.3 Mating interaction of imp overexpressing mutants ............................................ 53 3.9.4 Inositol phosphates profile in imp overexpressing mutants ............................... 54 3.9.5 Effect of SDS on imp overexpressing mutants ................................................... 55 3.10 Proteome analysis in imp overexpressing mutants .................................................... 56 3.11 Membrane trafficking related proteins are induced in imp overexpressing strains ... 58 3.12 The effect of Brefeldin A on membrane trafficking
Recommended publications
  • Table 2. Significant
    Table 2. Significant (Q < 0.05 and |d | > 0.5) transcripts from the meta-analysis Gene Chr Mb Gene Name Affy ProbeSet cDNA_IDs d HAP/LAP d HAP/LAP d d IS Average d Ztest P values Q-value Symbol ID (study #5) 1 2 STS B2m 2 122 beta-2 microglobulin 1452428_a_at AI848245 1.75334941 4 3.2 4 3.2316485 1.07398E-09 5.69E-08 Man2b1 8 84.4 mannosidase 2, alpha B1 1416340_a_at H4049B01 3.75722111 3.87309653 2.1 1.6 2.84852656 5.32443E-07 1.58E-05 1110032A03Rik 9 50.9 RIKEN cDNA 1110032A03 gene 1417211_a_at H4035E05 4 1.66015788 4 1.7 2.82772795 2.94266E-05 0.000527 NA 9 48.5 --- 1456111_at 3.43701477 1.85785922 4 2 2.8237185 9.97969E-08 3.48E-06 Scn4b 9 45.3 Sodium channel, type IV, beta 1434008_at AI844796 3.79536664 1.63774235 3.3 2.3 2.75319499 1.48057E-08 6.21E-07 polypeptide Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RIKEN cDNA 2310040G17 gene 1417619_at 4 3.38875643 1.4 2 2.69163229 8.84279E-06 0.0001904 BC056474 15 12.1 Mus musculus cDNA clone 1424117_at H3030A06 3.95752801 2.42838452 1.9 2.2 2.62132809 1.3344E-08 5.66E-07 MGC:67360 IMAGE:6823629, complete cds NA 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1454696_at -3.46081884 -4 -1.3 -1.6 -2.6026947 8.58458E-05 0.0012617 beta 1 Gnb1 4 153 guanine nucleotide binding protein, 1417432_a_at H3094D02 -3.13334396 -4 -1.6 -1.7 -2.5946297 1.04542E-05 0.0002202 beta 1 Gadd45gip1 8 84.1 RAD23a homolog (S.
    [Show full text]
  • Proteomic and Metabolomic Analyses of Mitochondrial Complex I-Deficient
    THE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY VOL. 287, NO. 24, pp. 20652–20663, June 8, 2012 © 2012 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc. Published in the U.S.A. Proteomic and Metabolomic Analyses of Mitochondrial Complex I-deficient Mouse Model Generated by Spontaneous B2 Short Interspersed Nuclear Element (SINE) Insertion into NADH Dehydrogenase (Ubiquinone) Fe-S Protein 4 (Ndufs4) Gene*□S Received for publication, November 25, 2011, and in revised form, April 5, 2012 Published, JBC Papers in Press, April 25, 2012, DOI 10.1074/jbc.M111.327601 Dillon W. Leong,a1 Jasper C. Komen,b1 Chelsee A. Hewitt,a Estelle Arnaud,c Matthew McKenzie,d Belinda Phipson,e Melanie Bahlo,e,f Adrienne Laskowski,b Sarah A. Kinkel,a,g,h Gayle M. Davey,g William R. Heath,g Anne K. Voss,a,h René P. Zahedi,i James J. Pitt,j Roman Chrast,c Albert Sickmann,i,k Michael T. Ryan,l Gordon K. Smyth,e,f,h b2 a,h,m,n3 David R. Thorburn, and Hamish S. Scott Downloaded from From the aMolecular Medicine Division, gImmunology Division, and eBioinformatics Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, the bMurdoch Childrens Research Institute, Royal Children’s Hospital and Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia, the cDépartement de Génétique Médicale, Université de Lausanne, 1005 Lausanne, Switzerland, the dCentre for Reproduction and Development, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia, the hDepartment of Medical Biology
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • Abstracts from the 50Th European Society of Human Genetics Conference: Electronic Posters
    European Journal of Human Genetics (2019) 26:820–1023 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-018-0248-6 ABSTRACT Abstracts from the 50th European Society of Human Genetics Conference: Electronic Posters Copenhagen, Denmark, May 27–30, 2017 Published online: 1 October 2018 © European Society of Human Genetics 2018 The ESHG 2017 marks the 50th Anniversary of the first ESHG Conference which took place in Copenhagen in 1967. Additional information about the event may be found on the conference website: https://2017.eshg.org/ Sponsorship: Publication of this supplement is sponsored by the European Society of Human Genetics. All authors were asked to address any potential bias in their abstract and to declare any competing financial interests. These disclosures are listed at the end of each abstract. Contributions of up to EUR 10 000 (ten thousand euros, or equivalent value in kind) per year per company are considered "modest". Contributions above EUR 10 000 per year are considered "significant". 1234567890();,: 1234567890();,: E-P01 Reproductive Genetics/Prenatal and fetal echocardiography. The molecular karyotyping Genetics revealed a gain in 8p11.22-p23.1 region with a size of 27.2 Mb containing 122 OMIM gene and a loss in 8p23.1- E-P01.02 p23.3 region with a size of 6.8 Mb containing 15 OMIM Prenatal diagnosis in a case of 8p inverted gene. The findings were correlated with 8p inverted dupli- duplication deletion syndrome cation deletion syndrome. Conclusion: Our study empha- sizes the importance of using additional molecular O¨. Kırbıyık, K. M. Erdog˘an, O¨.O¨zer Kaya, B. O¨zyılmaz, cytogenetic methods in clinical follow-up of complex Y.
    [Show full text]
  • Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling Provides Insight Into
    BASIC RESEARCH www.jasn.org Transcriptomic and Proteomic Profiling Provides Insight into Mesangial Cell Function in IgA Nephropathy † † ‡ Peidi Liu,* Emelie Lassén,* Viji Nair, Celine C. Berthier, Miyuki Suguro, Carina Sihlbom,§ † | † Matthias Kretzler, Christer Betsholtz, ¶ Börje Haraldsson,* Wenjun Ju, Kerstin Ebefors,* and Jenny Nyström* *Department of Physiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, §Proteomics Core Facility at University of Gothenburg, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; †Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine and Department of Computational Medicine and Bioinformatics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; ‡Division of Molecular Medicine, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Japan; |Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; and ¶Integrated Cardio Metabolic Centre, Karolinska Institutet Novum, Huddinge, Sweden ABSTRACT IgA nephropathy (IgAN), the most common GN worldwide, is characterized by circulating galactose-deficient IgA (gd-IgA) that forms immune complexes. The immune complexes are deposited in the glomerular mesangium, leading to inflammation and loss of renal function, but the complete pathophysiology of the disease is not understood. Using an integrated global transcriptomic and proteomic profiling approach, we investigated the role of the mesangium in the onset and progression of IgAN. Global gene expression was investigated by microarray analysis of the glomerular compartment of renal biopsy specimens from patients with IgAN (n=19) and controls (n=22). Using curated glomerular cell type–specific genes from the published literature, we found differential expression of a much higher percentage of mesangial cell–positive standard genes than podocyte-positive standard genes in IgAN. Principal coordinate analysis of expression data revealed clear separation of patient and control samples on the basis of mesangial but not podocyte cell–positive standard genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 1. the List of 1,675 All Stages of AD-Related Upregulated Genes
    Supplementary Table 1. The list of 1,675 all stages of AD-related upregulated genes Gene ID Gene symbol Gene name 51146 A4GNT ALPHA-1,4-N-ACETYLGLUCOSAMINYLTRANSFERASE 9625 AATK APOPTOSIS-ASSOCIATED TYROSINE KINASE 19 ABCA1 ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY A (ABC1), MEMBER 1 20 ABCA2 ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY A (ABC1), MEMBER 2 10058 ABCB6 ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY B (MDR/TAP), MEMBER 6 89845 ABCC10 ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY C (CFTR/MRP), MEMBER 10 5826 ABCD4 ATP-BINDING CASSETTE, SUB-FAMILY D (ALD), MEMBER 4 25 ABL1 V-ABL ABELSON MURINE LEUKEMIA VIRAL ONCOGENE HOMOLOG 1 3983 ABLIM1 ACTIN BINDING LIM PROTEIN 1 30 ACAA1 ACETYL-COENZYME A ACYLTRANSFERASE 1 (PEROXISOMAL 3-OXOACYL-COENZYME A THIOLASE) 35 ACADS ACYL-COENZYME A DEHYDROGENASE, C-2 TO C-3 SHORT CHAIN 8310 ACOX3 ACYL-COENZYME A OXIDASE 3, PRISTANOYL 56 ACRV1 ACROSOMAL VESICLE PROTEIN 1 2180 ACSL1 ACYL-COA SYNTHETASE LONG-CHAIN FAMILY MEMBER 1 86 ACTL6A ACTIN-LIKE 6A 93973 ACTR8 ACTIN-RELATED PROTEIN 8 91 ACVR1B ACTIVIN A RECEPTOR, TYPE IB 8747 ADAM21 ADAM METALLOPEPTIDASE DOMAIN 21 27299 ADAMDEC1 ADAM-LIKE, DECYSIN 1 56999 ADAMTS9 ADAM METALLOPEPTIDASE WITH THROMBOSPONDIN TYPE 1 MOTIF, 9 105 ADARB2 ADENOSINE DEAMINASE, RNA-SPECIFIC, B2 (RED2 HOMOLOG RAT) 109 ADCY3 ADENYLATE CYCLASE 3 113 ADCY7 ADENYLATE CYCLASE 7 120 ADD3 ADDUCIN 3 (GAMMA) 125 ADH1C ALCOHOL DEHYDROGENASE 1A (CLASS I), ALPHA POLYPEPTIDE 9370 ADIPOQ ADIPONECTIN, C1Q AND COLLAGEN DOMAIN CONTAINING 165 AEBP1 AE BINDING PROTEIN 1 4299 AFF1 AF4/FMR2 FAMILY, MEMBER 1 173 AFM AFAMIN 79814 AGMAT AGMATINE
    [Show full text]
  • Enzymes Important in the KREBS-HENSELEIT UREA SYNTHESIZING CYCLE* ARGINASE ORNITHINE CARBAMOYLTRANSFERASE (E.C. 3.5,3,1) from Beef Liver (E.C
    enzymes important in the KREBS-HENSELEIT UREA SYNTHESIZING CYCLE* ARGINASE ORNITHINE CARBAMOYLTRANSFERASE (E.C. 3.5,3,1) from Beef Liver (E.C. 2.1.3.3) from Streptococcus faecalis (L-Arginine Ureohydrolase; (Ornithine Transcarbamylase; Carbamoylphosphate: L-Arginine amidinohydrolase) L-Ornithine Carbamoyltransferase) Lyophilized powder Lyophilized with Trizma ® buffer. Catalyzes the following reaction: SuitableforthedeterminationofCarbamyl Phosphate L-Arginine + H~O-*L-Ornithine + Urea and Ornithine, One unit will convert approximately one micromole One unit will form one micromole of Citrulline from of L(+) Arginine to L-Ornithine and Urea per minute Ornithine and Carbamyl Phosphate I~er minute at at pH 9.5 at 37°C. pH 8.5 at 37°C. Order Sigma Product No. A-2137 Order Sigma Product No. O-2501 Approx. 60 units per mg. Protein (Biuret) Approx. 600 units per mg. Protein (Lowry) 2500 units $ 4.85 12,500 units $20.00 30 units $5.00 300 units $40.00 6250 units 11.00 25,000 units 30.00 *Ref.: Krebs, H. A. and Henseleit, K., Z. Physiol. Chem., 210:33 ().932). Other enzymes related to AMMONIA NITROGEN METABOLISM: L-Asparaginase Glutamic Oxalacetic Transaminase Glutaminase L-Aspartase Glutamic-Pyruvic Transaminase L-Histidase Creatininase Gabase Adenosine Deaminase L-Glutamic Dehydrogenase Useful for assay of'r-Aminobutyric Acid. 5'-AMP Deaminase See the Sigma Catalog for further details. ~//~"~ CARBOXYPEPTIDASE - B (E. C. No. 3.4.2.2.) catalyzes hydrolysis of the basic amino acids Arginine and Lysine from the carboxyl terminal position in polypeptides. One of the major pancreatic proteases, Carboxypeptidase-B also functions in the further degradation of products of tryptic digestion.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatal Neonatal-Onset Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Disease with T Cell Immunodeficiency
    0031-3998/06/6003-0321 PEDIATRIC RESEARCH Vol. 60, No. 3, 2006 Copyright © 2006 International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc. Printed in U.S.A. Fatal Neonatal-Onset Mitochondrial Respiratory Chain Disease with T Cell Immunodeficiency JANINE REICHENBACH, RALF SCHUBERT, RITA HORVA` TH, JENS PETERSEN, NANCY FU¨ TTERER, ELISABETH MALLE, ANDREAS STUMPF, BORIS R. GEBHARDT, ULRIKE KOEHL, BURKHART SCHRAVEN, AND STEFAN ZIELEN Department of General Paediatrics [J.R., R.S., A.S., B.R.G., S.Z.], Department of Paediatric Haematology, Oncology and Haemostaselogy [U.K.], J.W. Goethe University Frankfurt, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany; Institutes of Clinical Chemistry, Molecular Diagnostics and Mitochondrial Genetics [R.H., E.M.], Academic Hospital Schwabing Munich, Children’s Hospital and Institute of Medical Genetics [N.F.], Technical University Munich, Metabolic Disease Center, Munich-Schwabing, 80804 Munich, Germany; Department of Neurology [J.P.], Friedrich-Baur-Institut, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, 80336 Munich, Germany; Institute of Immunology [B.S.], Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 39120 Magdeburg, Germany ABSTRACT: We present the clinical and laboratory features of a MDS is defined as a reduction of mtDNA copy number boy with a new syndrome of mitochondrial depletion syndrome and compared with nDNA in different tissues, which leads to T cell immunodeficiency. The child suffered from severe recurrent insufficient synthesis of RC complexes I, III, IV, and V (3). infectious diseases, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Clinically, he Autosomal recessive mutations of five nuclear genes have presented with severe psychomotor retardation, axial hypotonia, and a disturbed pain perception leading to debilitating biting of the been identified in MDS patients with different clinical presen- thumb, lower lip, and tongue.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Function of Metallohydrolases in the Arginase- Deacetylase Family
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations 2016 Structure and Function of Metallohydrolases in the Arginase- Deacetylase Family Yang Hai University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations Part of the Biochemistry Commons Recommended Citation Hai, Yang, "Structure and Function of Metallohydrolases in the Arginase-Deacetylase Family" (2016). Publicly Accessible Penn Dissertations. 1753. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1753 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/edissertations/1753 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Structure and Function of Metallohydrolases in the Arginase-Deacetylase Family Abstract Arginases and deacetylases are metallohydrolases that catalyze two distinct chemical transformations. The arginases catalyze the hydrolysis of the guanidinium group of arginine by using a hydroxide ion 2+ 2+ bridging the binuclear manganese cluster (Mn A-Mn B) for nucleophilic attack. The deacetylases catalyze the hydrolysis of amide bonds by using a mononuclear Zn2+-ion activated water molecule as the nucleophile. Despite the diverse functions, metallohydrolases of the arginase-deacetylase superfamily 2+ share the same characteristic α/β hydrolase core fold and a conserved metal binding site (the Mn B site in arginase corresponds to the catalytic Zn2+ site in deacetylase) which is essential for catalysis in both enzymes. We report crystal structure of formiminoglutamase from the parasitic protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi and confirm that formiminoglutamase is a Mn2+-requiring hydrolase that belongs to the arginase- deacetylase superfamily. We also report the crystal structure of an arginase-like protein from Trypanosoma brucei (TbARG) with unknown function. Although its biological role remains enigmatic, the 2+ evolutionarily more conserved Mn B site can be readily restored in TbARG through side-directed mutagenesis.
    [Show full text]
  • A High-Fat Diet Coordinately Downregulates Genes Required for Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation in Skeletal Muscle Lauren M
    A High-Fat Diet Coordinately Downregulates Genes Required for Mitochondrial Oxidative Phosphorylation in Skeletal Muscle Lauren M. Sparks, Hui Xie, Robert A. Koza, Randall Mynatt, Matthew W. Hulver, George A. Bray, and Steven R. Smith Obesity and type 2 diabetes have been associated with a ray studies have shown that genes involved in oxidative high-fat diet (HFD) and reduced mitochondrial mass phosphorylation (OXPHOS) exhibit reduced expression and function. We hypothesized a HFD may affect expres- levels in the skeletal muscle of type 2 diabetic subjects and sion of genes involved in mitochondrial function and prediabetic subjects. These changes may be mediated by biogenesis. To test this hypothesis, we fed 10 insulin- the peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor ␥ coacti- sensitive males an isoenergetic HFD for 3 days with vator-1 (PGC1) pathway. PGC1␣- and PGC1␤-responsive muscle biopsies before and after intervention. Oligonu- cleotide microarray analysis revealed 297 genes were OXPHOS genes show reduced expression in the muscle of differentially regulated by the HFD (Bonferonni ad- patients with type 2 diabetes (3,4). In addition to the justed P < 0.001). Six genes involved in oxidative cellular energy sensor AMP kinase, the peroxisome prolif- phosphorylation (OXPHOS) decreased. Four were mem- erator–activated receptor cofactors PGC1␣ (5–7) and pos- bers of mitochondrial complex I: NDUFB3, NDUFB5, sibly PGC1␤ (8) activate mitochondrial biogenesis and NDUFS1, and NDUFV1; one was SDHB in complex II and increase OXPHOS gene expression by increasing the tran- a mitochondrial carrier protein SLC25A12. Peroxisome scription, translation, and activation of the transcription proliferator–activated receptor ␥ coactivator-1 (PGC1) -and PGC1␤ mRNA were decreased by ؊20%, P < 0.01, factors necessary for mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) repli ␣ and ؊25%, P < 0.01, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-NDUFS1 Polyclonal Antibody Cat: K110186P Summary
    Anti-NDUFS1 Polyclonal Antibody Cat: K110186P Summary: 【Product name】: Anti-NDUFS1 Antibody 【Source】: Rabbit 【Isotype】: IgG 【Species reactivity】: Human Mouse Rat 【Swiss Prot】: P28331 【Gene ID】: 4719 【Calculated】: MW:68/73/75/79/81kDa 【Purification】: Octanoic acid-ammonium sulfate precipitation 【Tested applications】: IHC 【Recommended dilution】: IHC 1:50-200. 【IHC Positive sample】: Human breast cancer 【Subcellular location】: Cytoplasm 【Immunogen】: A synthetic peptide of human NDUFS1 【Storage】: Shipped at 4°C. Upon delivery aliquot and store at -20°C Background: The protein encoded by this gene belongs to the complex I 75 kDa subunit family. Mammalian complex I is composed of 45 different subunits. It locates at the mitochondrial inner membrane. This protein has NADH dehydrogenase activity and oxidoreductase activity. It transfers electrons from NADH to the respiratory chain. The immediate electron acceptor for the enzyme is believed to be ubiquinone. This protein is the largest subunit of complex I and it is a component of the iron-sulfur (IP) fragment of the enzyme. It may form part of the active site crevice where NADH is oxidized. Mutations in this gene are associated with complex I deficiency. Several transcript variants encoding different isoforms have been found for this gene. Sales:[email protected] Tech:[email protected] For research purposes only. Tel:400-968-6088 Please visit www.solarbio.com for a more product information Verified picture Immunohistochemistry of paraffin-embedded Human breast cancer with NDUFS1 antibody diluted at 1:100 Sales:[email protected] Tech:[email protected] For research purposes only. Tel:400-968-6088 Please visit www.solarbio.com for a more product information.
    [Show full text]
  • Impaired Mitochondrial Fatty Acid Synthesis Leads to Neurodegeneration in Mice
    This Accepted Manuscript has not been copyedited and formatted. The final version may differ from this version. Research Articles: Neurobiology of Disease Impaired mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis leads to neurodegeneration in mice Remya R. Nair1, Henna Koivisto2, Kimmo Jokivarsi2, Ilkka J. Miinalainen3, Kaija J. Autio1, Aki Manninen1,4, Heikki Tanila2, J. Kalervo Hiltunen1 and Alexander J. Kastaniotis1 1Faculty of Biochemistry and Molecular Medicine, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland 2A. I. Virtanen Institute, University of Eastern Finland, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finland 3Electron Microscopy Core Facility, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland 4Virus Core Facility, Biocenter Oulu, University of Oulu, FI-90014 Oulu, Finland DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3514-17.2018 Received: 13 December 2017 Revised: 31 August 2018 Accepted: 19 September 2018 Published: 28 September 2018 Author contributions: R.R.N., A.M., H.T., J.K.H., and A.J.K. designed research; R.R.N., H.K., K.J., I.M., K.J.A., H.T., and J.K.H. performed research; R.R.N., H.K., K.J., I.M., K.J.A., A.M., H.T., J.K.H., and A.J.K. analyzed data; R.R.N., H.K., K.J., I.M., K.J.A., A.M., H.T., J.K.H., and A.J.K. wrote the paper; A.M. contributed unpublished reagents/analytic tools. Conflict of Interest: The authors declare no competing financial interests. We are grateful to Dr Raija Soininen for the continuous support at various stages of this project and critical review of this manuscript. The Biocenter Oulu Transgenic Core facility, the Biocenter Oulu EM laboratory and the Biocenter Oulu Virus Core laboratory, which are all part of Biocenter Finland, are acknowledged for the support in generating mice, in the EM analysis and the lentivirus production, respectively.
    [Show full text]