DOCSLIB.ORG

Supplemental Tables

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supplemental Tables -1- Supplemental Tables ATTN: "Neural correlates of predictive and postdictive switching mechanisms for internal models" by Hiroshi Imamizu and Mitsuo Kawato -2- Activity related to cue (event-related response in test trial): instructed condition (Fig. 4A) Peak coordinate Maximum x y z T-value Cluster size Frontal/central lobe Cluster 1 －50 2 44 15.19 3353 Precentral gyrus (L) (24.1%), Middle frontal gyrus (L) (16.1%), Supplementary motor area (L) (14.9%), Supplementary motor area (R) (7.6%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (L) (6.6%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (L) (5.9%), Superior frontal gyrus (L) (5.7%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (4.5%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (4.0%), Anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (4.0%), Anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (2.5%), Superior frontal gyrus, medial orbital (L) (2.3%) Cluster 2 －34 44 30 7.54 418 Middle frontal gyrus (L) (79.4%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (L) (9.8%), Superior frontal gyrus (L) (3.4%) Cluster 3 52 10 52 7.41 405 Middle frontal gyrus (R) (63.0%), Precentral gyrus (R) (33.3%) Parietal/occipital lobe Cluster 1 －30 －68 44 12.85 6087 Precuneus (R) (13.2%), Inferior parietal gyri (L) (10.6%), Precuneus (L) (9.8%), Cuneus (L) (8.7%), Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex (R) (7.4%), Superior parietal gyrus (L) (7.3%), Cuneus (R) (7.0%), Middle occipital gyrus (L) (6.2%), Lingual gyrus (L) (4.9%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (4.6%), Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex (L) (4.1%), Lingual gyrus (R) (3.8%), Superior occipital gyrus (L) (3.8%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (2.4%), Angular gyrus (L) (2.3%) Cluster 2 38 －64 50 5.75 307 Angular gyrus (R) (84.0%), Superior parietal gyrus (R) (10.4%), Inferior parietal gyrus (R) (5.0%) -3- Temporal lobe Cluster 1 62 －36 2 7.11 697 Middle temporal gyrus (R) (85.8%), Superior temporal gyrus (R) (11.1%), Inferior temporal gyrus (R) (2.9%) Cerebellum Cluster 1 －46 －60 －36 13.79 1609 Cerebellum crus1 (L) (46.2%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (L) (24.3%), Fusiform gyrus (L) (23.3%), Inferior temporal gyrus (L) (3.4%), Cerebellum crus2 (L) (1.3%) Cluster 2 32 －74 －18 10.25 1838 Cerebellum lobule 6 (R) (32.6%), Cerebellum crus1 (R) (32.0%), Fusiform gyrus (R) (25.2%), Inferior occipital gyrus (R) (7.6%), Lingual gyrus (R) (1.2%) -4- Activity related to cue (event-related response in test trial): non-instructed condition (Fig. 4B) Peak coordinate Maximum x y z T-value Cluster size Frontal/central lobe Cluster 1 48 14 54 7.56 825 Middle frontal gyrus (R) (48.2%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (R) (35.4%), Precentral gyrus (R) (7.6%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (R) (4.7%) Cluster 2 －44 18 30 6.48 635 Middle frontal gyrus (L) (38.6%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (L) (36.4%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (L) (15.4%), Precentral gyrus (L) (9.0%) Parietal/occipital lobe Cluster 1 4 －64 42 12.76 3637 Precuneus (R) (25.7%), Precuneus (L) (23.2%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (11.8%), Cuneus (R) (11.5%), Cuneus (L) (11.4%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (7.5%), Posterior cingulate gyrus (L) (1.2%), Superior parietal gyrus (L) (1.0%) Cluster 2 40 －62 46 8.12 516 Angular gyrus (R) (86.4%), Inferior parietal gyrus (R) (6.2%), Superior occipital gyrus (R) (2.7%), Superior parietal gyrus (R) (2.3%), Middle occipital gyrus (R) (2.3%) Cluster 3 －34 －66 42 6.06 324 Inferior parietal gyrus (L) (42.3%), Angular gyrus (L) (29.6%), Middle occipital gyrus (L) (19.8%), Superior Parietal gyrus (L) (8.3%) Cluster 4 4 －76 0 6.19 715 Lingual gyrus (R) (27.6%), Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex (L) (26.4%), Lingual gyrus (L) (25.6%), Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex (R) (17.6%) Temporal lobe Cluster 1 66 －44 －14 9.05 688 Middle temporal gyrus (R) (84.5%), Inferior temporal gyrus (R) (14.5%) -5- Cerebellum Cluster 1 36 －58 －24 15.81 2144 Fusiform gyrus (R) (27.3%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (R) (25.8%), Cerebellum crus1 (R) (18.4%), Inferior occipital gyrus (R) (17.4%), Cerebellum crus2 (R) (3.0%), Cerebellum lobule 7b (R) (2.2%), Middle occipital gyrus (R) (1.8%) Cluster 2 －34 －64 －20 8.09 973 Cerebellum lobule 6 (L) (37.9%), Cerebellum crus1 (L) (27.8%), Fusiform gyrus (L) (26.9%), Inferior temporal gyrus (L) (2.0%), Inferior occipital gyrus (L) (1.6%), Lingual gyrus (L) (1.5%) Limbic lobe Cluster 1 16 －18 －18 4.43 750 Parahippocampal gyrus (R) (23.3%), Hippocampus (R) (11.7%), Cerebellum lobule 3 (R) (5.1%), Lingual gyrus (R) (3.3%), Cerebellum lobule 4/5 (R) (2.4%) -6- Activity related to cue (test trial > error-equalized trial): instructed condition (Fig. 4C) Peak coordinate Maximum x y z T-value Cluster size Frontal/central lobe Cluster 1 －54 6 44 9.74 2889 Precentral gyrus (L) (26.9%), Middle frontal gyrus (R) (14.9%), Middle frontal gyrus (L) (13.2%), Superir frontal gyrus (L) (10.0%), Precentral gyrus (R) (9.1%), Supplementary motor area (L) (7.0%), Supplementary motor area (R) (5.0%), Superior frontal gyrus (R) (3.8%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (R) (3.1%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (L) (3.1%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (L) (1.5%) Cluster 2 －2 20 48 7.34 382 Supplementary motor area (L) (51.6%), Supplementary motor area (R) (17.5%), Superior frontal gyrus, medial (L) (17.3%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (5.7%), Superior frontal gyrus, medial (R) (4.2%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (3.7%) Cluster 3 －36 46 24 6.95 444 Middle frontal gyrus (L) (77.0%), Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part (L) (20.5%) Parietal/occipital lobe Cluster 1 －38 －48 60 9.98 5066 Superior parietal gyrus (L) (22.4%), Inferior parietal gyri (L) (19.4%), Precuneus (L) (15.5%), Precuneus (R) (12.6%), Superior parietal gyrus (R) (9.7%), Angular gyeus (R) (6.0%), Middle cccipital gyrus (L) (4.6%), Superior occipital gyrus (L) (2.5%), Superior occipital gyrus (R) (1.7%), Cuneus (L) (1.1%) Cerebellum Cluster 1 －44 －58 －34 8.38 1223 Cerebellum crus1 (L) (67.2%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (L) (17.4%), Fusiform gyrus (L) (8.5%), Inferior temporal gyrus (L) (3.8%), Cerebellum crus2 (L) (1.3%) Cluster 2 32 －58 －28 7.89 1931 -7- Cerebellum crus1 (R) (31.4%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (R) (31.1%), Fusiform gyrus (R) (16.1%), Inferior occipital gyrus (R) (13.8%), Inferior temporal gyrus (R) (2.7%), Lingual gyrus (R) (2.3%), -8- Activity related to cue (test trial > error-equalized trial): non-instructed condition (Fig. 4D) Peak coordinate Maximum x y z T-value Cluster size Frontal/central lobe Cluster 1 44 12 58 6.90 409 Middle frontal gyrus (R) (78.7%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (R) (12.7%), Precentral gyrus (R) (2.2%) Parietal/occipital lobe Cluster 1 40 －62 46 8.21 565 Angular gyrus (R) (67.3%), Inferior parietal gyrus (R) (23.7%), Superior parietal guys (R) (8.3%) Cluster 2 2 －68 44 6.85 622 Precuneus (L) (52.4%), Precuneus (R) (43.3%), Cuneus (R) (2.7%) Cluster 3 －36 －64 48 6.17 317 Inferior parietal gyrus (L) (67.5%), Superior parietal gyrus (L) (15.8%), Angular gyrus (L) (14.5%) Cerebellum/occipital lobe Cluster 1 －36 －54 －36 8.12 458 Cerebellum crus1 (L) (60.0%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (L) (21.6%), Cerebellum crus2 (L) (6.6%), Cerebellum lobule 7b (L) (4.4%), Cerebellum lobule 8 (L) (1.5%) Cluster 2 34 －68 －16 5.43 354 Cerebellum lobule 6 (R) (46.9%), Fusiform gyrus (R) (28.3%), Cerebellum crus1 (R) (24.9%) Limbic lobe Cluster 1 2 －22 30 6.74 400 Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (44.8%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (26.3%), Posterior cingulate gyrus (L) (4.0%) -9- Activity related to execution/feedback (event-related response in test trial): instructed condition (Fig. 4E) Peak coordinate Maximum x y z T-value Cluster size Frontal/central/parietal lobe Cluster 1 －42 －4 58 16.21 10176 Superior parietal gyrus (L) (13.2%), Precentral gyrus (L) (12.6%), Superior parietal gyrus (R) (11.0%), Precuneus (R) (9.1%), Inferior parietal gyrus (L) (7.7%), Precuneus (L) (7.1%), Postcentral gyrus (L) (5.2%), Supplementary motor area (L) (4.9%), Superiro frontal gyrus (R) (4.8%), Middle frontal gyrus (R) (4.2%), Superior frontal gyrus (L) (4.1%), Supplementary motor area (R) (3.7%), Middle frontal gyrus (L) (2.1%), Inferior parietal gyrus (R) (1.6%), Superior occipital gyrus (R) (1.5%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (R) (1.3%), Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri (L) (1.2%) Cerebellum Cluster 1 24 －64 －24 11.42 8493 Cerebellum lobule 6 (R) (17.3%), Cerebellum crus1 (L) (16.9%), Cerebellum lobule 6 (L) (10.9%), Cerebellum crus1 (R) (7.0%), Cerebellum lobule 8 (R) (4.6%), Cerebellum lobule 8 (L) (4.6%), Fusiform gyrus (R) (4.1%), Vermis lobule 6 (4.1%), Lingual gyrus (L) (4.0%), Cerebellum crus2 (L) (3.2%), Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex (L) (2.7%), Fusiform gyrus (L) (2.5%), Vermis lobule 8 (2.3%), Vermis lobule 7 (2.2%), Lingual gyrus (R) (1.8%), Cerebellum lobule 4/5 (R) (1.3%), Cerebellum lobule 7b (L) (1.2%), Vermis lobule 4/5 (1.0%) Temporal/inferior frontal lobe Cluster 1 56 18 －6 7.79 305 Temporal pole: superior temporal gyrus (R) (43.0%), Inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part (R) (17.7%), Insula (R) (9.5%), Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part (R) (8.9%), Rolandic operculum (R) (2.3%) -10- Activity related to execution/feedback (event-related response in test trial): non-instructed condition (Fig.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Functional Role of the Supplementary and Pre-Supplementary Motor Areas
    REVIEWS Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas Parashkev Nachev*‡, Christopher Kennard‡ and Masud Husain* Abstract | The supplementary motor complex consists of the supplementary motor area, the supplementary eye field and the pre-supplementary motor area. In recent years, these areas have come under increasing scrutiny from cognitive neuroscientists, motor physiologists and clinicians because they seem to be crucial for linking cognition to action. However, theories regarding their function vary widely. This Review brings together the data regarding the supplementary motor regions, highlighting outstanding issues and providing new perspectives for understanding their functions. Ever since they were first identified, the regions that which we hope will stimulate the development of comprise the supplementary motor complex (SMC) have conceptual frameworks for a better understanding remained, in large part, a mystery. Most investigators now of this region. appreciate that these brain regions are far from ‘supple- mentary’ to requirements1–7. Without them, there are Anatomy and connections profound alterations in behaviour. For example, lesions to The supplementary motor area (SMA) and pre- these areas in humans can lead to alien-limb syndrome, supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) are, in humans, with patients demonstrating involuntary actions such as located on the medial aspect of the brain: in the dorso- grasping nearby objects — even other people — without medial frontal cortex3,14, anterior to the leg representa- ever intending to do so8,9. Some individuals demonstrate tion of the primary motor cortex (FIG. 1). Both areas lie utilization behaviour: unable to resist the impulse to use in the superior frontal gyrus and constitute the medial an object that has been placed within their reach, even part of Brodmann’s area 6c (later divided into two areas: when the object is not needed10.
    [Show full text]
  • Short- and Long-Term Deficits After Unilateral Ablation Andthe Effects of Subsequent Callosal Section’
    0270.6474/84/0404-0918$02.00/0 The Journal of Neuroscience Copyright 0 Society for Neuroscience Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 918-929 Printed in U.S.A. April 1984 SUPPLEMENTARY MOTOR AREA OF THE MONKEY’S CEREBRAL CORTEX: SHORT- AND LONG-TERM DEFICITS AFTER UNILATERAL ABLATION ANDTHE EFFECTS OF SUBSEQUENT CALLOSAL SECTION’ COBIE BRINKMAN Experimental Neurology Unit, The John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, Australia 2601 Received March 7, 1983; Revised November 11, 1983; Accepted November 15, 1983 Abstract The short-term and long-term behavioral effects of unilateral lesions of the supplementary motor area (SMA) were studied in five monkeys (Mczcaca fascicularis ssp). A monkey with a unilateral lesion of the premotor area (PM) served as a control. In all animals, general behavior was unaffected by the lesions. For a few weeks postoperatively, all monkeys showed a clumsiness of forelimb movements, bilaterally, which involved both the distal and proximal muscles. Two SMA-lesioned monkeys (but not the PM-lesioned one), studied for up to 1 year postoperatively, showed a characteristic deficit of bimanual coordination where the two hands tended to behave in a similar manner instead of sharing the task between them. This deficit was more pronounced after a lesion contralateral to the nonpreferred hand. The deficit was interpreted as indicating that the intact SMA now influenced the motor outflow of both the ipsilateral hemisphere and the contralateral one through the corpus callosum. Callosal section immediately abolished the bimanual deficit, although the clumsiness returned transiently. The results imply that SMA may give rise normally to discharges informing the contralateral hemisphere of intended and/or ongoing movements via the corpus callosum.
    [Show full text]
  • Down but Not out in Posterior Cingulate Cortex: Deactivation Yet Functional Coupling with Prefrontal Cortex During Demanding Semantic Cognition
    NeuroImage 141 (2016) 366–377 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect NeuroImage journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ynimg Down but not out in posterior cingulate cortex: Deactivation yet functional coupling with prefrontal cortex during demanding semantic cognition Katya Krieger-Redwood ⁎, Elizabeth Jefferies, Theodoros Karapanagiotidis, Robert Seymour, Adonany Nunes, Jit Wei Aaron Ang, Vierra Majernikova, Giovanna Mollo, Jonathan Smallwood Department of Psychology/York Neuroimaging Centre, University of York, Heslington, York, United Kingdom article info abstract Article history: The posterior cingulate cortex (pCC) often deactivates during complex tasks, and at rest is often only weakly cor- Received 30 March 2016 related with regions that play a general role in the control of cognition. These observations led to the hypothesis Accepted 29 July 2016 that pCC contributes to automatic aspects of memory retrieval and cognition. Recent work, however, has sug- Available online 30 July 2016 gested that the pCC may support both automatic and controlled forms of memory processing and may do so by changing its communication with regions that are important in the control of cognition across multiple do- Keywords: mains. The current study examined these alternative views by characterising the functional coupling of the Posterior cingulate cortex Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex pCC in easy semantic decisions (based on strong global associations) and in harder semantic tasks (matching Semantic control words on the basis of specific non-dominant features). Increasingly difficult semantic decisions led to the expect- Executive ed pattern of deactivation in the pCC; however, psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed that, under Rest these conditions, the pCC exhibited greater connectivity with dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (PFC), relative to Connectivity both easier semantic decisions and to a period of rest.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems
    REVIEW ARTICLE FUNCTIONAL A Practical Review of Functional MRI Anatomy of the Language and Motor Systems X V.B. Hill, X C.Z. Cankurtaran, X B.P. Liu, X T.A. Hijaz, X M. Naidich, X A.J. Nemeth, X J. Gastala, X C. Krumpelman, X E.N. McComb, and X A.W. Korutz ABSTRACT SUMMARY: Functional MR imaging is being performed with increasing frequency in the typical neuroradiology practice; however, many readers of these studies have only a limited knowledge of the functional anatomy of the brain. This text will delineate the locations, anatomic boundaries, and functions of the cortical regions of the brain most commonly encountered in clinical practice—specifically, the regions involved in movement and language. ABBREVIATIONS: FFA ϭ fusiform face area; IPL ϭ inferior parietal lobule; PPC ϭ posterior parietal cortex; SMA ϭ supplementary motor area; VOTC ϭ ventral occipitotemporal cortex his article serves as a review of the functional areas of the brain serving to analyze spatial position and the ventral stream working Tmost commonly mapped during presurgical fMRI studies, to identify what an object is. Influenced by the dorsal and ventral specifically targeting movement and language. We have compiled stream model of vision, Hickok and Poeppel2 hypothesized a sim- what we hope is a useful, easily portable, and concise resource that ilar framework for language. In this model, the ventral stream, or can be accessible to radiologists everywhere. We begin with a re- lexical-semantic system, is involved in sound-to-meaning map- view of the language-processing system. Then we describe the pings associated with language comprehension and semantic ac- gross anatomic boundaries, organization, and function of each cess.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical Parcellation Protocol
    CORTICAL PARCELLATION PROTOCOL APRIL 5, 2010 © 2010 NEUROMORPHOMETRICS, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Jason Tourville, Ph.D. Research Assistant Professor Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems Boston University Ruth Carper, Ph.D. Assistant Research Scientist Center for Human Development University of California, San Diego Georges Salamon, M.D. Research Dept., Radiology David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM MANY OTHERS Neuromorphometrics, Inc. 22 Westminster Street Somerville MA, 02144-1630 Phone/Fax (617) 776-7844 neuromorphometrics.com OVERVIEW The cerebral cortex is divided into 49 macro-anatomically defined regions in each hemisphere that are of broad interest to the neuroimaging community. Region of interest (ROI) boundary definitions were derived from a number of cortical labeling methods currently in use. Protocols from the Laboratory of Neuroimaging at UCLA (LONI; Shattuck et al., 2008), the University of Iowa Mental Health Clinical Research Center (IOWA; Crespo-Facorro et al., 2000; Kim et al., 2000), the Center for Morphometric Analysis at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH-CMA; Caviness et al., 1996), a collaboration between the Freesurfer group at MGH and Boston University School of Medicine (MGH-Desikan; Desikan et al., 2006), and UC San Diego (Carper & Courchesne, 2000; Carper & Courchesne, 2005; Carper et al., 2002) are specifically referenced in the protocol below. Methods developed at Boston University (Tourville & Guenther, 2003), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (McCarley & Shenton, 2008), Stanford (Allan Reiss lab), the University of Maryland (Buchanan et al., 2004), and the University of Toyoma (Zhou et al., 2007) were also consulted. The development of the protocol was also guided by the Ono, Kubik, and Abernathy (1990), Duvernoy (1999), and Mai, Paxinos, and Voss (Mai et al., 2008) neuroanatomical atlases.
    [Show full text]
  • Cortical and Subcortical Anatomy: Basics and Applied
    43rd Congress of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation Basic mechanisms of epileptogenesis and principles of electroencephalography Cortical and subcortical anatomy: basics and applied J. A. Kiernan MB, ChB, PhD, DSc Department of Anatomy & Cell Biology, The University of Western Ontario London, Canada LEARNING OBJECTIVES Know and understand: ! Two types of principal cell and five types of interneuron in the cerebral cortex. ! The layers of the cerebral cortex as seen in sections stained to show either nucleic acids or myelin. ! The types of corrtex: allocortex and isocortex. ! Major differences between extreme types of isocortex. As seen in primary motor and primary sensory areas. ! Principal cells in different layers give rise to association, commissural, projection and corticothalamic fibres. ! Cortical neurons are arranged in columns of neurons that share the same function. ! Intracortical circuitry provides for neurons in one column to excite one another and to inhibit neurons in adjacent columns. ! The general plan of neuronal connections within nuclei of the thalamus. ! The location of motor areas of the cerebral cortex and their parallel and hierarchical projections to the brain stem and spinal cord. ! The primary visual area and its connected association areas, which have different functions. ! Somatotopic representation in the primary somatosensory and motor areas. ! Cortical areas concerned with perception and expression of language, and the anatomy of their interconnections. DISCLOSURE FORM This disclosure form must be included as the third page of your Course Notes and the third slide of your presentation. It is the policy of the Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation to insure balance, independence, objectivity and scientific rigor in all of its education programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Anatomy and White Matter Connections of the Superior Frontal Gyrus
    Anatomy and White Matter Connections of the Superior Frontal Gyrus Robert G. Briggs, BS1; A. Basit Khan, MD5; Arpan R. Chakraborty, BS2; Carol J Abraham, BS2; Christopher D. Anderson, BA2; Patrick J. Karas, MD5; Phillip A. Bonney, MD1; Ali H. Palejwala, MD2; Andrew K. Conner, MD2; Daniel L. O’Donoghue, PhD3; and Michael E. Sughrue, MD4 1Department of Neurosurgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 2Department of Neurosurgery, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 3Department of Cell Biology, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 4Center for Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery, Prince of Wales Private Hospital, Sydney, Australia 5Department of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas Running Title: SFG Subcortical Anatomy Keywords: neurology, neurosurgery, white matter, imaging, connectome Corresponding Author: Michael E. Sughrue, MD Suite 3, Level 7 Prince of Wales Private Hospital Barker Street, Randwick New South Wales, 2031 Australia Tel: 02 9650 4940 Fax: 02 9650 4902 Email: [email protected] This article has been accepted for publication and undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1002/ca.23523 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Funding: None. Declaration of Interests: None. Anatomy and White Matter Connections of the Superior Frontal Gyrus ABSTRACT Introduction. The superior frontal gyrus (SFG) is an important region implicated in a variety of tasks including motor movement, working memory, resting-state and cognitive control. A detailed understanding of the subcortical white matter of the SFG could improve post-operative morbidity related to surgery around this gyrus.
    [Show full text]
  • Neuromodulation: Harnessing Neuroplasticity with Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation
    Neuromodulation: Harnessing Neuroplasticity with Brain Stimulation and Rehabilitation Presenters: Cecília N. Prudente, PT, MS, PhD1 Bernadette T. Gillick, PT, MS, PhD1 Colum MacKinnon, PhD2 Teresa J.Kimberley, PT, PhD1 1Dept. of Rehabilitation Medicine 2Dept. of Neurology Conflicts of interest TJK: consulting income from MicroTransponder Others: Nothing to declare Learning objectives 1. Be familiar with forms of brain stimulation 2. Be able to identify safety and feasibility of each technique 3. Understand the purposes of using the parameters of brain stimulation 4. Translate brain stimulation research into clinical implications Harnessing neuroplasticity to improve motor function 1. Neuromodulation tools 2. Down-regulation 3. Up-regulation 4. Hijacking neural firing patterns 5. Where are we now, where are we going, and how do we get there? 6. Discussion Harnessing neuroplasticity to improve motor function 1. Neuromodulation tools 2. Down-regulation 3. Up-regulation 4. Hijacking neural firing patterns 5. Where are we now, where are we going, and how do we get there? 6. Discussion What is neuromodulation? http://blog.cambridgeconsultants.com/medical-technology/wp- content/uploads/2014/05/Neuromodulation.jpg Publications per year 1200 1000 800 Neuromodulation 600 Neuromodulation & rehabilitation 400 200 0 2016 1978 1988 1998 2008 Source: Pubmed How to neuromodulate? Healthy state Neuroplasticity Injury Medications Neuromodulation Rehabilitation Neuromodulation tools Why neuromodulate? E I Healthy state : greater excitability : greater inhibition
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Ultrasonic Neuromodulation of the Peripheral Nervous System: Enhanced Or Suppressed Activities?
    applied sciences Review A Review on Ultrasonic Neuromodulation of the Peripheral Nervous System: Enhanced or Suppressed Activities? Bin Feng * , Longtu Chen and Sheikh J. Ilham Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; [email protected] (L.C.); [email protected] (S.J.I.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-860-486-6435 Received: 14 March 2019; Accepted: 9 April 2019; Published: 19 April 2019 Featured Application: The current review summarizes our recent knowledge of ultrasonic neuromodulation of peripheral nerve endings, axons, and somata in the dorsal root ganglion. This review indicates that focused ultrasound application at intermediate intensity can be a non-thermal and reversible neuromodulatory means for targeting the peripheral nervous system to manage neurological disorders. Abstract: Ultrasonic (US) neuromodulation has emerged as a promising therapeutic means by delivering focused energy deep into the nervous tissue. Low-intensity ultrasound (US) directly activates and/or inhibits neurons in the central nervous system (CNS). US neuromodulation of the peripheral nervous system (PNS) is less developed and rarely used clinically. The literature on the neuromodulatory effects of US on the PNS is controversial, with some studies documenting enhanced neural activities, some showing suppressed activities, and others reporting mixed effects. US, with different ranges of intensity and strength, is likely to generate distinct physical effects in the stimulated neuronal tissues, which underlies different experimental outcomes in the literature. In this review, we summarize all the major reports that document the effects of US on peripheral nerve endings, axons, and/or somata in the dorsal root ganglion. In particular, we thoroughly discuss the potential impacts of the following key parameters on the study outcomes of PNS neuromodulation by US: frequency, pulse repetition frequency, duty cycle, intensity, metrics for peripheral neural activities, and type of biological preparations used in the studies.
    [Show full text]
  • White Matter Anatomy: What the Radiologist Needs to Know
    White Matter Anatomy What the Radiologist Needs to Know Victor Wycoco, MBBS, FRANZCRa, Manohar Shroff, MD, DABR, FRCPCa,*, Sniya Sudhakar, MBBS, DNB, MDb, Wayne Lee, MSca KEYWORDS Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) White matter tracts Projection fibers Association Fibers Commissural fibers KEY POINTS Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has emerged as an excellent tool for in vivo demonstration of white matter microstructure and has revolutionized our understanding of the same. Information on normal connectivity and relations of different white matter networks and their role in different disease conditions is still evolving. Evidence is mounting on causal relations of abnormal white matter microstructure and connectivity in a wide range of pediatric neurocognitive and white matter diseases. Hence there is a pressing need for every neuroradiologist to acquire a strong basic knowledge of white matter anatomy and to make an effort to apply this knowledge in routine reporting. INTRODUCTION (Fig. 1). However, the use of specific DTI sequences provides far more detailed and clini- DTI has allowed in vivo demonstration of axonal cally useful information. architecture and connectivity. This technique has set the stage for numerous studies on normal and abnormal connectivity and their role in devel- DIFFUSION TENSOR IMAGING: THE BASICS opmental and acquired disorders. Referencing established white matter anatomy, DTI atlases, Using appropriate magnetic field gradients, and neuroanatomical descriptions, this article diffusion-weighted sequences can be used to summarizes the major white matter anatomy and detect the motion of the water molecules to and related structures relevant to the clinical neurora- from cells. This free movement of the water mole- diologist in daily practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Ipsilateral Cortical Connections of Dorsal and Ventral Premotor Areas in New World Owl Monkeys
    THE JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY 495:691–708 (2006) Ipsilateral Cortical Connections of Dorsal and Ventral Premotor Areas in New World Owl Monkeys IWONA STEPNIEWSKA,1 TODD M. PREUSS,2,3 AND JON H. KAAS1* 1Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203 2Division of Neuroscience and Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia 30329 3Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia 30322 ABSTRACT In order to compare connections of premotor cortical areas of New World monkeys with those of Old World macaque monkeys and prosimian galagos, we placed injections of fluo- rescent tracers and wheat germ agglutinin-horseradish peroxidase (WGA-HRP) in dorsal (PMD) and ventral (PMV) premotor areas of owl monkeys. Motor areas and injection sites were defined by patterns of movements electrically evoked from the cortex with microelec- trodes. Labeled neurons and axon terminals were located in brain sections cut either in the coronal plane or parallel to the surface of flattened cortex, and they related to architectoni- cally and electrophysiologically defined cortical areas. Both the PMV and PMD had connec- tions with the primary motor cortex (M1), the supplementary motor area (SMA), cingulate motor areas, somatosensory areas S2 and PV, and the posterior parietal cortex. Only the PMV had connections with somatosensory areas 3a, 1, 2, PR, and PV. The PMD received inputs from more caudal portions of the cortex of the lateral sulcus and more medial portions of the posterior parietal cortex than the PMV. The PMD and PMV were only weakly interconnected. New World owl monkeys, Old World macaque monkeys, and galagos share a number of PMV and PMD connections, suggesting preservation of a common sensorimotor network from early primates.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Connectivity Predicts Clinical Outcomes of Deep Brain Stimulation
    doi:10.1093/brain/awaa188 BRAIN 2020: 143; 2607–2623 | 2607 Structural connectivity predicts clinical outcomes of deep brain stimulation for Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/brain/article/143/8/2607/5870430 by Johns Hopkins University user on 24 March 2021 Tourette syndrome Kara A. Johnson,1,2 Gordon Duffley,1,2 Daria Nesterovich Anderson,1,2,3 Jill L. Ostrem,4 Marie-Laure Welter,5 Juan Carlos Baldermann,6,7 Jens Kuhn,6,8 Daniel Huys,6 Veerle Visser-Vandewalle,9 Thomas Foltynie,10 Ludvic Zrinzo,10 Marwan Hariz,10,11 Albert F.G. Leentjens,12 Alon Y. Mogilner,13 Michael H. Pourfar,13 Leonardo Almeida,14 Aysegul Gunduz,14,15 Kelly D. Foote,14 Michael S. Okun14 and Christopher R. Butson1,2,3,16 Deep brain stimulation may be an effective therapy for select cases of severe, treatment-refractory Tourette syndrome; however, pa- tient responses are variable, and there are no reliable methods to predict clinical outcomes. The objectives of this retrospective study were to identify the stimulation-dependent structural networks associated with improvements in tics and comorbid obsessive- compulsive behaviour, compare the networks across surgical targets, and determine if connectivity could be used to predict clinical outcomes. Volumes of tissue activated for a large multisite cohort of patients (n = 66) implanted bilaterally in globus pallidus inter- nus (n = 34) or centromedial thalamus (n = 32) were used to generate probabilistic tractography to form a normative structural connectome. The tractography maps were used to identify networks that were correlated with improvement in tics or comorbid ob- sessive-compulsive behaviour and to predict clinical outcomes across the cohort.
    [Show full text]