Penrith Lakes Scheme Conservation Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Penrith Lakes Scheme Conservation Management Plan Penrith Lakes Scheme Conservation Management Plan Report prepared for Penrith Lakes Development Corporation September 2010 Report Register The following report register documents the development and issue of the report entitled Penrith Lakes Scheme—Conservation Management Plan, undertaken by Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd in accordance with its quality management system. Godden Mackay Logan operates under a quality management system which has been certified as complying with the Australian/New Zealand Standard for quality management systems AS/NZS ISO 9001:2008. Job No. Issue No. Notes/Description Issue Date 07-0411 1 Draft report July 2008 07-0411 2 Draft report December 2009 07-0411 3 Draft report February 2010 07-0411 4 Final report July 2010 07-0411 5 Final Report (September 2010, reformatted November 2010) November 2010 Copyright Historical sources and reference material used in the preparation of this report are acknowledged and referenced at the end of each section and/or in figure captions. Reasonable effort has been made to identify, contact, acknowledge and obtain permission to use material from the relevant copyright owners. Unless otherwise specified or agreed, copyright in this report vests in Godden Mackay Logan Pty Ltd (‘GML’) and in the owners of any pre-existing historic source or reference material. Moral Rights GML asserts its Moral Rights in this work, unless otherwise acknowledged, in accordance with the (Commonwealth) Copyright (Moral Rights) Amendment Act 2000. GML’s moral rights include the attribution of authorship, the right not to have the work falsely attributed and the right to integrity of authorship. Right to Use GML grants to the client for this project (and the client’s successors in title) an irrevocable royalty-free right to reproduce or use the material from this report, except where such use infringes the copyright and/or Moral Rights of GML or third parties. Contents Page 1.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ...................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Why is this CMP Needed? ............................................................................................................... 1 1.3 When to use this CMP? ................................................................................................................... 1 1.4 How to use this CMP........................................................................................................................ 2 1.5 Study Area........................................................................................................................................ 4 1.6 Statutory Listings.............................................................................................................................. 5 1.6.1 Sydney Regional Environmental Plan 11.................................................................................. 5 1.6.2 Penrith Local Environmental Plan 1991 (Environmental Heritage Conservation)..................... 6 1.6.3 NSW State Heritage Register.................................................................................................... 7 1.7 Non-statutory Listings....................................................................................................................... 7 1.7.1 National Trust Register (NSW).................................................................................................. 7 1.7.2 Register of the National Estate.................................................................................................. 7 1.7.3 The Deed of Agreement 1987................................................................................................... 8 1.8 Previous Reports.............................................................................................................................. 8 1.9 Methodology and Terminology......................................................................................................... 8 1.10 Limitations ...................................................................................................................................... 9 1.11 Authorship .................................................................................................................................... 10 1.12 Acknowledgements...................................................................................................................... 10 1.13 Endnotes ...................................................................................................................................... 12 2.0 Historical Context ............................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Occupation, Contact and Conflict................................................................................................... 14 2.3 Living at Castlereagh...................................................................................................................... 21 2.4 Shaping the Land ........................................................................................................................... 25 2.5 Seeing and Representing the Land ............................................................................................... 35 2.6 New South Wales Historic Themes ............................................................................................... 41 2.7 Chronological Timeline................................................................................................................... 43 2.8 Endnotes ........................................................................................................................................ 44 3.0 Physical Description and Analysis................................................................................................ 47 3.1 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 47 3.2 Site Analysis................................................................................................................................... 47 3.2.1 Landscape and Setting............................................................................................................ 47 3.2.2 Plantings .................................................................................................................................. 48 3.2.3 Roads ...................................................................................................................................... 49 3.2.4 Fencelines ............................................................................................................................... 50 3.2.5 Built Elements.......................................................................................................................... 50 3.3 Cultural Landscape of the Penrith Lakes Scheme......................................................................... 53 3.4 Views.............................................................................................................................................. 53 3.5 Condition and Integrity ................................................................................................................... 54 3.6 Archaeological Features ................................................................................................................ 55 3.7 Endnotes ........................................................................................................................................ 66 Penrith Lakes Scheme—Conservation Management Plan, September 2010 4.0 Assessment of Heritage Significance ........................................................................................... 67 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 67 4.2 New South Wales Heritage Assessment Guidelines..................................................................... 67 4.2.1 Introduction.............................................................................................................................. 67 4.3 Heritage Assessment of Penrith Lakes.......................................................................................... 68 4.3.1 Criterion A (Historic: Evolution) ............................................................................................... 68 4.3.2 Criterion B (Historic: Association)............................................................................................ 69 4.3.3 Criterion C (Aesthetic Significance)......................................................................................... 70 4.3.4 Criterion D (Social Significance).............................................................................................. 70 4.3.5 Criterion E (Research Potential).............................................................................................. 71 4.3.6 Criterion F (Rarity) ................................................................................................................... 72 4.3.7
Recommended publications
  • Branch Cuttings
    The newsletter of the Sydney and Northern New South Wales Branch of the Australian Garden History Society BRANCH CUTTINGS Issue 55 – February 2018 This branch is affiliated with the Royal Australian Historical Society & National Trust of Australia (NSW) ___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ FILOLI – One of the finest remaining US country estates of the early 20th Century by Susan North On my way home from a recent holiday in Russia I spent two days with a friend’s family in Woodside, California. My friend had arranged for us to visit FILOLI, an historic property nearby. I had no idea what I was about to see…. FILOLI is one of 27 sites owned by the US National Trust for Historic Preservation and is operated by the Filoli Centre. It is located 51 kms outside central San Francisco and is recognised as one of the finest remaining country estates of the early 20th century. FILOLI was built by Mr & Mrs William Bowers Bourn II, a wealthy San Francisco family who relocated to the peninsula after the 1906 earthquake. The Bourns owned the Empire Gold Mine, the largest hard-rock mining operation in California, as well as the Spring Valley Water Company and the Crystal Springs Reservoir. Cambridge-educated Mr Bourn selected the site and called it FILOLI by combing the first two letters from the key words of his credo: “ FIght for a just cause; LOve your fellow man; LIve a good life.” The Bourns engaged Willis Polk, a San Francisco architect to design their country estate. The house is predominantly modified- Georgian in style, containing over 5000 square metres of interior Filoli house from a walled orchard garden in late floor space with 56 rooms, including 10 family bedrooms, 16 winter/early spring bathrooms, 17 fireplaces, a ballroom and a servants’ wing.
    [Show full text]
  • October 2010
    1 ASHET News October 2010 Volume 3, number 4 ASHET News October 2010 Newsletter of the Australian Society for History of Engineering and Technology th Reservoir, was approved in 1938 and completed in 1940. Preliminary University of Queensland’s 100 geological work for a dam on the Warragamba finally commenced in Anniversary 1942. A dam site was selected in 1946. The University of Queensland and its engineering school are celebrating Building the dam their 100th anniversary this year. Naming the members of the first Senate Excavation work on the Warragamba Dam started in 1948 and actual in the Government Gazette of 16 April 1910 marked the foundation of the construction of the dam began in 1950. It was completed in 1960. It was University. It was Australia’s fifth university. built as a conventional mass concrete dam, 142 metres high and 104 The University’s foundation professor of engineering was Alexander metres thick at the base. For the first time in Australia, special measures James Gibson, Born in London in 1876, he was educated at Dulwich were taken to reduce the effects of heat generated during setting of the College and served an apprenticeship with the Thames Ironworks, concrete; special low-heat cement was used, ice was added to the concrete Shipbuilding and Engineering Company. He became an Assocaite during mixing, and chilled water was circulated through embedded pipes Member of the Institution of Civil Engineers in 1899. He migrated to during setting of the concrete. Shanghai in that year, and came to Sydney in 1900, where he became a The dam was designed to pass a maximum flow of 10,000 cubic fitter at Mort’s Dock.
    [Show full text]
  • Sydney Water in 1788 Was the Little Stream That Wound Its Way from Near a Day Tour of the Water Supply Hyde Park Through the Centre of the Town Into Sydney Cove
    In the beginning Sydney’s first water supply from the time of its settlement Sydney Water in 1788 was the little stream that wound its way from near A day tour of the water supply Hyde Park through the centre of the town into Sydney Cove. It became known as the Tank Stream. By 1811 it dams south of Sydney was hardly fit for drinking. Water was then drawn from wells or carted from a creek running into Rushcutter’s Bay. The Tank Stream was still the main water supply until 1826. In this whole-day tour by car you will see the major dams, canals and pipelines that provide water to Sydney. Some of these works still in use were built around 1880. The round trip tour from Sydney is around 350 km., all on good roads and motorway. The tour is through attractive countryside south Engines at Botany Pumping Station (demolished) of Sydney, and there are good picnic areas and playgrounds at the dam sites. source of supply. In 1854 work started on the Botany Swamps Scheme, which began to deliver water in 1858. The Scheme included a series of dams feeding a pumping station near the present Sydney Airport. A few fragments of the pumping station building remain and can be seen Tank stream in 1840, from a water-colour by beside General Holmes Drive. Water was pumped to two J. Skinner Prout reservoirs, at Crown Street (still in use) and Paddington (not in use though its remains still exist). The ponds known as Lachlan Swamp (now Centennial Park) only 3 km.
    [Show full text]
  • “GWS 2050”: a Vision to Future-Proof the Region
    “GWS-2050”: A Vision to Future-Proof the Region Christopher Brown AM Chairman, Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue Two years ago the Western Sydney Leadership Dialogue was established to: - Raise awareness and stimulate debate on key issues in Greater Western Sydney - Provide and encourage interaction between key influencers and decision-makers - Demonstrate leadership and action on major projects and in sensitive policy areas We’ve had some success… - Campaigned for infrastructure investment: - Staged major regional policy events and promoted local talent and reputation ✓ - Cabinet support for Badgerys Creek ✓ - Championed local government reform ✓ - Light rail connecting Westmead, Parramatta and Olympic Park and heavy-rail - Advocated for revitalisation of Liverpool, line connecting north-south and airport ✓ Campbelltown & Blacktown city centres ✓ - Flood mitigation for Warragamba Dam ✓ - Pushed for WSU campus, Dept Planning & NAB to locate in Parramatta Square ✓ - $1b+ for ANZ & Parramatta Stadiums and relocation of Powerhouse Museum ✓ - One planning body across Govt (GSC) ✓ What’s next? - Future-proofing this dynamic growth region, from Olympic Park to Katoomba and from Windsor to Wollondilly. - GWS-2050 will examine ‘over-the- INSERT WS MAP horizon’ projects, initiatives, policies and actions required for a efficient, liveable, prosperous, and sustainable region. - It will look beyond today’s ‘catch-up’ approach to ensure we cater for, and shape, future growth. Working closely with our Partners, our Regional Collaborators and our Stakeholders, GWS-2050 will: - Respond to current Government and private sector plans to shape policy - Host events, seminars and policy forums to enable a wide dialogue with community - Address the challenges and leverage the opportunities to future-proof the region GWS-2050 Six Pillars: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Wildlife Lake
    Wildlife Lake Landscape Concept Penrith Lakes Development Corporation October 2010 WILDLIFE LAKE LANDSCAPE CONCEPT REPORT Client Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Limited PO Box 457 Cranebrook NSW 2749 Prepared by CLOUSTON Associates Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners 6A Wetherill Street • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 PO Box 44 • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 Telephone (02) 9569 3388 • Facsimile (02) 9569 3523 Email • [email protected] NS 1023 • R-01 • G • October 2010 Revision Date Description Checked A 14.05.09 Interim issue to client for review CD B 18.05.09 Draft issue for client review CD C 29.05.09 Document finalised for Two Year Plan submission CD D 29.06.09 Document revised and finalised for meeting with the Minister CD for Planning (prior to Two Year Plan submission) E 16.10.09 Further revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission CD F 11.12.09 Further client revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission CD G 29.10.10 Further client revisions prior to Two Year Plan Submission COMMENTS Revision A Interim issue of (document not complete) Revision B Base line and Opportunities plans completed Revision C Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision D Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision E Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision F Client comments incorporated throughout document. Revision G Client revisions incorporated throughout document. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page no. 1.0 INTrODUCTION 4 2.0 PrOJECT BACKGrOUND 5 3.0 PrOPOSED LANDSCAPE DESIGN PrINCIPLES 10 4.0 PrOPOSED
    [Show full text]
  • History of Sydney Water
    The history of Sydney Water Since the earliest days of European settlement, providing adequate water and sewerage services for Sydney’s population has been a constant challenge. Sydney Water and its predecessor, the Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Board, has had a rich and colourful history. This history reflects the development and growth of Sydney itself. Over the past 200 years, Sydney’s unreliable rainfall has led to the development of one of the largest per capita water supplies in the world. A truly reliable water supply was not achieved until the early 1960s after constructing Warragamba Dam. By the end of the 20th Century, despite more efficient water use, Sydney once again faced the prospect of a water shortage due to population growth and unreliable rainfall patterns. In response to this, the NSW Government, including Sydney Water, started an ambitious program to secure Sydney’s water supplies. A mix of options has been being used including water from our dams, desalination, wastewater recycling and water efficiency. Timeline 1700s 1788 – 1826 Sydney was chosen as the location for the first European settlement in Australia, in part due to its outstanding harbour and the availability of fresh water from the Tank Stream. The Tank Stream remained Sydney’s main water source for 40 years. However, pollution rapidly became a problem. A painting by J. Skinner Prout of the Tank Stream in the 1840s 1800s 1880 Legislation was passed under Sir Henry Parkes, as Premier, which constitutes the Board of Water Supply and Sewerage. 1826 The Tank Stream was abandoned as a water supply because of pollution from rubbish, sewage and runoff from local businesses like piggeries.
    [Show full text]
  • 12925 ID Bentley1982penrithl
    PENRITH LAKES DEVELOPMENT SCHEME REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY REPORT ON THE NON-ABORIGINAL ENVIRONMENTAL HERITAGE RESEARCHED BY MS. FRAN BENTLEY FOR MS. J. BIRMINGHAM UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY JUNE 1982 -'" --- CITY OF PLNRITH w w o 01 \ o t'27l+ 500 N w' o o PLAN m o "(\,.1. SHOWING PART OF THE LAND ZONED RURAL A2 INTERIM DEVE.LOPMENT ':2:~ 000 N ORDER NI? 93 CITY OF PENRITH. IS u PARISH CA~,TLEREAGH COUNTY CUMBE.RLAND (\ 'O() 200 +O~i 500 ,,,;P SCA~E. ~">/ / / / "', ''<-<:'A' ,-, RAV·\ ~.~ ,"",'l/\J$ / / ...... ',:. ; '. , \, ___ J 1-- I 1271 soc \1 \ ---~---+ ---- ._. ., .,.~~~ ", \ 11 ,I --t ,j­ j-, i ! , , ~ A q ST1,'\i'SCN -~~--~-------~-~---r - - -f--,----~.-----~~ . /-., , .I1-~ ; < .' w..; I Cl I c­ l/" w, / 0, o ". b,','I' o -- -~, 4- -'-_-.(."""_ -----t - -" --d-f \, ); / , I ~--' w 1.1);' o ! ,; o<c, Ni 1'­ N _______ ~ _~ _--,- __'2_7_0000 N . ' C.·,5CC N -, 126", 500 11 \ , , " " !2(C~OOO \ : :-;." ____-l-- - --~---. '. -- ,'. '."l , '~ j~ j I i 1'2:0 8 COO N ----~---t-- --, +-_. ! I / -' -,1.- --'~ I '.'. , , ___ I ... ' ------ - - --- C4MAlCO . ----------- PQODUc1S I/ ' , .... ' PT";' '-r ... ', - - - :..., -,0.< '," 1267000 N -~ -~-"-------o::-.:t_-------:-~, '--,.~,"-------,-.-.~ --~""'------- t-i- --1- ---~-- i- 1206500 N ---+- --- ---·--I----~-- <"\.'" .........", >:- '" I 126::; CC;:) ~i 1266000 N - --,r'-- -i- , I, I / " '; LEGEND --~------ ----NOTE. : ~ .., ....... ;' .. .. BLL'[ ~1ETAL INDUSTRIES LTD PLAN SHOWS LANDS IN WHICH THE FARLEY AND LEWERS LTD RESPECTIVE COMPANIES HAVE A DIRECT .+ •••••• , PIONEER CONCRETE SERVICES LTD OR BENEFICIAL INTEREST AT '2 ,IIOIi£~BO / READY M IXED CONCRETE LTD GRAVEL BOUNDARY FROM B M I ............ PENRITH LAkES DEVUOPMENT DRAWING Ne MS -'291/A AND IS CORPORATION LTD APPROXIMATE ONLY , AREA "ZONED I. RURAL "A '2' UNC'U: I DO.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Update December 2020
    Community update December 2020 Building Western Sydney International (Nancy- Bird Walton) Airport involves one of the largest earthmoving challenges in Australian history. What’s happening on site? Major earthworks are well underway, with over • Moving 25 million cubic metres of earth 200 machines operating on site. • Clearing and remediation We’ve made strong progress on major earthworks, • Importation of sandstone from Sydney with over 8 million cubic metres of earth moved so tunnelling projects far, in addition to the almost 2 million cubic metres • Topsoil stripping moved during our initial earthworks phase. Large • Mobilisation of machinery and areas of the once very hilly site are being flattened personnel to site to make way for the airport terminal, runway, roads • Traffic control along Badgerys Creek and taxiways to access the runway. Road. Our large excavators have been working their way What works are starting soon? through the ridgeline where the old Northern Road • Permanent airport drainage installation, was and our dump trucks are hauling the material including pipes, culverts and basins. towards the Elizabeth Drive end of the site. Since our last update, the project team Early next year, surface miners will start operating have continued to reach new earthmoving to remove rock and dense material that even our milestones including moving close to largest excavators struggle to pick up. 500,000 cubic metres of earth in a single We’re also preparing to install drainage across week! the site. This will allow us to control water across New machinery and staff continue to the site, during construction and when the airport be mobilised with social distancing and is operating.
    [Show full text]
  • Re-Imagining Water in Western Sydney Western Sydney Regional Master Plan
    Re-imagining water in Western Sydney Western Sydney Regional Master Plan March 2020 This report has been prepared for planning and discussion purposes only. No decisions have been made. Foreword Acknowledgment A message from Paul Plowman Sydney Water acknowledges the traditional owners of the lands It is an eciting and proud moment to release the rst ever Western that include the Western Sydney Region and the living culture of the Sydney Regional Master Plan – Re-imagining water in Western Sydney, traditional custodians of these lands. Sydney Water recognises that developed in partnership with ke stakeholders in the region the traditional owners have occupied and cared for this Country over nprecedented investment in Western Sdne is driving an eciting countless generations and celebrates their continuing contribution to transformation centred around reater Sdnes new second international airport B Western Sdnes population is the life of Western Sydney. forecast to double reaching a total population of million he Western Sdne Regional Master Plan proect has been a collaborative effort between Sdne Water Re-valuing the vast volumes of stormwater and wastewater ensuring Aecom Aurecon oint enture AA and Marsden acob Associates ever drop of water is being put to its best use will help us ensure we have enough resources to service a growing Sdne Sdne Water would also like to thank the following organisations who have participated in the development of this Master Plan Without sufcient water the Western Parkland Cit the reater Sdne Commissions
    [Show full text]
  • Penrith Lakes Visual Management Strategy Penrith Lakes Development Corporation August 2009 PENRITH LAKES PARKLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
    Penrith Lakes Visual Management Strategy Penrith Lakes Development Corporation August 2009 PENRITH LAKES PARKLAND VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY Client Penrith Lakes Development Corporation Limited PO Box 457 Cranebrook NSW 2749 Revision Date Description Checked A 27.08.08 Draft issue to client for review CD Prepared by B 10.02.09 Draft issue for client review CD CLOUSTON Associates C 20.05.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD Landscape Architects • Urban Designers • Landscape Planners D 02.06.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD 6A Wetherill Street • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 PO Box 44 • Leichhardt • NSW 2040 E 05.06.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD Telephone (02) 9569 3388 • Facsimile (02) 9569 3523 F 02.07.09 Draft issue for client review CD Email • [email protected] G 14.07.09 Draft issue for client and John Mulally review CD NS 1023 • Issue H • 25th AUGUST 2009 H 31.08.09 Final Report COMMENTS Revision A Draft Issue Revision B Additional photographs added Revision C PLDC and GML suggested revisions incorporated Revision D John Mulally adjustments incorporated Revision E John Mulally further adjustments incorporated Revision F Further revisions incorporated Revision G John Mulally further revisions incorporated Revision H Daryl Kite revisions incorporated PENRITH LAKES VISUAL MANAGEMENT STRATEGY AUGUST 2009 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Title Page Title Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION 4 8.0 REFERENCES 34 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE STRATEGY 4 1.2 SCOPE AND LIMITS OF THE STRATEGY 4 APPENDICES 1.3 METHODOLOGY 4 A
    [Show full text]
  • Heritage Inventory Sheet
    Heritage Inventory Sheet Item Name Parramatta Road Milestone Recommended Name Parramatta Road Milestones Group Site Image Address Parramatta Road, between Dartbrook Road and Station Street, Auburn NSW 2144; and Parramatta Road, between Platform Street and Delhi Street, Lidcombe NSW 2144. Lot/Section/DP - - - Draft Cumberland LEP ID I295 Former LEP ID A51 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone; and A52 (Auburn LEP) Parramatta Road Milestone. Heritage Conservation Not included Area Date Updated March 2020 Significance Level LOCAL Site Type Level 1 Built Level 2 Exploration, Survey and Events Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Curtilage Map Note: Former item number used to identify individual milestones. Revised curtilage recommended – refer below Heritage Study 2019 – Extent Heritage Pty Ltd Statement of Significance The Parramatta Road Milestones Group are of local significance for their historic, associative, aesthetic and representative heritage values. The milestones are historically significant in their role of marking the distance of the journey along Parramatta Road from Parramatta to Sydney. They are a tangible reminder of the continuing importance of Parramatta Road as a main highway between Sydney, Parramatta and the West. While some milestones are no longer located in their exact original location, they relate to their original location and mark the significance of Parramatta Road and the construction of roads by the Department of Main Roads. The milestones are associated with the Department of Main Roads in 1934 and their implementation of the "Type D" milestones for use in urban situations. The milestones have aesthetic significance through their notable lettering and form, and their role as a landscape element.
    [Show full text]
  • STEP Matters Number 192 August 2017
    STEP Matters Number 192 August 2017 Sadly this newsletter has nothing to report that Sunday 8 October – Walk in Wyrrabalong could be described as good news. This is National Park symptomatic of the political malaise in Time: 9:45 for a 10 am start Canberra and the NSW government’s fixation Meet: end of Evans Road next to Heritage with development. August marks the date of Village and veteran’s retirement complex implementation of the Biodiversity Laws that Length: 7.5 km (about 4 h) will lead to greatly increased land clearing in Grade: medium: tracks are smooth and easy – rural and urban areas in NSW. Protests from no rocks, lots of ups and downs biodiversity experts have been ignored. Bring: snack or lunch, water, hat, camera, But the wildflowers are wonderful at the plant/bird i.d. books moment so great time to get out in the bush. Leader: John Martyn (0425 830 260) Book: register online so we can contact you if In this issue of STEP Matters we cover: we cancel due to bad weather STEP Events ..................................................................... 1 http://step.org.au/index.php/walks-talks Finkel Review on the Electricity Market – This walk is different to most STEP walks in What Happens Now? ...................................................... 2 being entirely through massive, forested Protect Sydney’s Green Spaces ........................................ 4 Quaternary age sand dunes. These rise to Tax Deductibility Status of Donations to Environment more than 40 m asl and form an isthmus Groups Under Threat ...................................................... 5 between Tuggerah Lake and the ocean. How Should the Flood Risk from the Hawkesbury Nepean be Managed? .........................
    [Show full text]