DOCSLIB.ORG

Mechanisms of Influence of Invasive Grass Litter on Germination and Growth of Coexisting Species in California

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mechanisms of Influence of Invasive Grass Litter on Germination and Growth of Coexisting Species in California Biol Invasions https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1668-5 ORIGINAL PAPER Mechanisms of influence of invasive grass litter on germination and growth of coexisting species in California Bao-Ming Chen . Carla M. D’Antonio . Nicole Molinari . Shao-Lin Peng Received: 16 May 2017 / Accepted: 13 January 2018 Ó Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract In grasslands, litter has been recognized as and two native (the grass S. pulchra, and the forb an important factor promoting grass persistence and Clarkia purpurea) herbaceous plants in a greenhouse the suppression of forbs. The invasive European setting. Our results showed that B. diandrus litter annual grass Bromus diandrus (ripgut brome) is cover hindered seedling establishment of the four widespread throughout California, where it produces species tested, but that the degree and mechanism of a persistent and thick litter layer. The native grass, inhibition was dependent on which species was tested, Stipa pulchra, is also common in some grassland life form (e.g. monocot/dicot) and seed size. Seedling settings and can also produce persistent litter, yet it is emergence of the two forb species was more vulner- typically associated with more forbs. Very little is able to litter cover than either grass species and both known about the mechanisms through which these two forbs had smaller seed size. After germination, only common grass species influence seedling establish- seedling biomass of B. diandrus itself was reduced by ment of both exotic invasive and native herbs. Here, litter (both B. diandrus and S. pulchra). We found no we evaluated the effect of B. diandrus and S. pulchra significant effects of leachate of either grass species on litter on seedling establishment of two invasive (the seedling emergence of any species, while a high grass B. diandrus and the forb Centaurea melitensis) concentration of B. diandrus leachates inhibited root growth of all species including B. diandrus seedlings. Stipa pulchra litter leachates did not affect S. pulchra B.-M. Chen (&) Á S.-L. Peng (&) or C. melitensis seedlings although it did suppress B. State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Key diandrus and C. purpurea seedling growth. Our Laboratory of Plant Resources, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China findings provide direct experimental evidence for the e-mail: [email protected]; mechanism of effect of litter on these coexisting [email protected] invasive and native species. Such evidence helps S.-L. Peng advance our understanding of role of B. diandrus and e-mail: [email protected] S. pulchra litter in California grassland. C. M. D’Antonio Á N. Molinari Ecology Evolution and Marine Biology, University of Keywords Allelopathy Á Bromus diandrus Á Bunch California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4160, USA grass Á Ripgut brome Á Soil nitrogen Á Thatch Present Address: N. Molinari U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region, Goleta, CA 93117, USA 123 B.-M. Chen et al. Introduction allelopathy (Foster and Gross 1998; Bonanomi et al. 2011; Cummings et al. 2012). The accumulation and decomposition of plant litter Exotic invasive species have the potential to has long been identified as an important factor influence plant composition and nutrient cycling of influencing both vegetation structure (Facelli and the invaded ecosystem via their living and dead (litter) Pickett 1991; Xiong and Nilsson 1997, 1999) and plant matter (Ehrenfeld 2003, 2010; Chen et al. 2013; ecosystem functioning (Wardle et al. 1997; Handa Eppinga and Molofsky 2013; Jo et al. 2016, 2017). In et al. 2014; Barbe et al. 2017). Accumulations of grasslands, the abundance of recalcitrant grass litter recalcitrant plant litter can reduce seed germination can be enhanced following invasion (Evans et al. and alter species composition and productivity (Ham- 2001; Molinari and D’Antonio 2014). Litter has been rick and Lee 1987; Amatangelo et al. 2008; Wolk- recognized as an important factor promoting exotic ovich et al. 2009). In harsh environments, litter can grass persistence (Lenz et al. 2003; Cox and Allen facilitate the establishment and growth of plants and 2008; Molinari 2014; Molinari and D’Antonio in enhance species diversity by improving moisture review), suggesting that it may function as a positive conditions (Fowler 1986; Willms et al. 1986). Plant feedback mechanism (Molinari and D’Antonio, in litter also plays a critical role in nutrient cycling, review). In the last few decades, it has been docu- organic matter turnover and community structure and mented that litter of invasive plants has the potential to dynamics (Gessner et al. 2010; van der Putten et al. influence species composition by modifying nutrient 2016). Interestingly, both the effects of grass-litter (in availability, reducing light levels, creating a physical contrast to other litter types) and the effects of litter in barrier and releasing allelochemicals (Bergelson grasslands (in contrast to other ecosystem types) could 1990; Hierro and Callaway 2003; Callaway and be positive or negative depending on the setting Ridenour 2004; Amatangelo et al. 2008; Yelenik and (Xiong and Nilsson 1999). In fact, a meta-analysis by Levine 2011; Kaproth et al. 2013; Loydi et al. 2015). Loydi et al. (2013) found an overall neutral effect of Bergelson (1990) found that the dead grass blades of litter presence on seedling emergence and survival and invasive grass Poa annua decreased seedling emer- a positive effect on seedling biomass, and they pointed gence and survival of the two studied annual weeds out that litter effects depend on many variables and changed the population dynamics of annual plants. including litter amount, study condition, grassland Litter accumulation of an exotic perennial species type and the seed size of species influenced by the (Holcus lanatus) was found to inhibit seed germina- litter. In addition, different litter types had differential tion of itself, with no significant effects on seed effects of on woodland and grassland species, and the germination of the native perennial species Stipa different effects were probably related to litter struc- pulchra (formerly Nassella pulchra) (Reynolds et al. ture (Donath and Eckstein 2008). 2001). Dead material of the invasive plant black The mechanisms through which litter influences mustard has potential to depress seedling emergence plant species and ecosystems are both direct and and growth of other native and exotic species through indirect (Facelli and Pickett 1991; Xiong and Nilsson allelopathy (Bell and Muller 1973). While several 1997; Bonanomi et al. 2011). The presence of litter studies evaluate these physical, chemical and biolog- affects the exchange of water between the soil and the ical effects of litter (e.g.) in isolation, the mechanisms atmosphere, an effect frequently observed in grass- have rarely been studied simultaneously. lands (Weaver and Rowland 1952; Fowler 1986) In California, exotic annual grasses have widely where litter increases water availability through shad- invaded grassland and shrubland habitats. The Eur- ing of the soil surface. Litter also constitutes a physical asian annual grass Bromus diandrus (ripgut brome), is barrier for seedling establishment because it may keep widespread throughout California (D’Antonio and seeds from reaching the soil, as well as physically Vitousek 1992; Malmstrom et al. 2005), New Zealand inhibit the emergence of seedlings (Bosy and Reader (Tozer et al. 2007) and Australia (Kleemann and Gill 1995; Olson and Wallander 2002). Moreover, litter 2009), and forms dense stands that when not grazed by may have negative effects on seed germination, and livestock develop a persistent and thick leaf litter layer plant growth through chemical inhibition, termed (Molinari and D’Antonio 2014). Although seed ger- mination and seedling establishment are two key 123 Mechanisms of influence of invasive grass litter on germination stages of a plant’s lifecycle that seem to be particularly predicted that the effects of litter leachates might be sensitive to the presence of litter, the chemical and stronger for B. diandrus litter because of its low physical mechanisms through which B. diandrus litter association with forbs in the field. influences seedling establishment of exotic invasive and native herbs has not been studied. In addition, native grassland species, like the widespread perennial Materials and methods bunchgrass Stipa pulchra can also create a persistent litter layer. However, in contrast to B. diandrus, S. Study sites and species pulchra provides habitat conditions that support a broad spectrum of native grassland organisms (Strom- The study site is Sedgwick Reserve (34°42004.3800N, berg et al. 2007), including a diversity of native herbs 120°02050.8100W), a 2358 ha reserve that is part of the (Molinari and D’Antonio 2014). Allelopathic poten- University of California Natural Reserve System tial of aqueous leachates of S. pulchra leaf litter was (UCNRS) and located in the Santa Ynez Valley. The demonstrated on a common exotic grass Avena fatua reserve is 29 km from the coast, receives approxi- in California (Hull and Muller 1977), yet we know mately 400 mm per year of precipitation and is nothing about how S. pulchra and B. diandrus transitional between wetter coastal prairies and the leachates compare or whether allelopathic potential drier grasslands of the Central and San Joaquin will be realized against a wider range of target species. Valleys (Bartolome et al. 2007). The climate in this Here, we selected two common exotic annual region is Mediterranean, with hot dry summers and species and two native herbaceous species to study cool wet winters. In this reserve, both the exotic the influence of B. diandrus and S. pulchra litter on species Bromus diandrus and native dominated grass- seedling establishment within a controlled greenhouse land patches of Stipa pulchra (purple needle grass) are setting. These species were chosen for study because scattered (Molinari 2014), which spurred interest in of their commonness and their ecological importance comparing the effect of grass litter of two dominant (see Materials and methods).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • California Native Grasses
    S EED & S UPPLIES FOR N O R T H E R N C ALIFORNIA CALIFORNIA NATIVE GRASSES All grasses are grown and/or collected from California sources. Custom mixes are available. CONTACT US for further information and ask about our collecting & producing seed for you. *Multiple types available Genus Species Common Name Achnatherum occidentalis Western Needlegrass Agrostis exerata Native Spiked Bentgrass Agrostis pallens Thingrass Bromus carinatus* California Bromegrass Bromus maritimus Maritime Brome Danthonia californica California Oatgrass Deschampsia caespitosa* Tufted Hairgrass Deschampsia caespitosa var. holciformis California Hairgrass Deschampsia elongatum Slender Hairgrass Elymus elymoides* Bottlebrush Squirreltail Elymus glaucus* Blue Wild Rye Elymus multisetus Big Squirreltail Elymus trachycaulum var. Yolo* California Slender Wheatgrass Festuca californica California Fescue Festuca idahoensis* Idaho Fescue Festuca occidentalis* Western Fescue/Mokelumne Blue Festuca rubra, Molate Blue Molate Blue Fescue Festuca rubra, Molate Molate Red Fescue Hordeum brachyantherum* Meadow Barley Hordeum californicum California Barley & Prostrate form Hordeum depressum Alkali Barley Koeleria macrantha Junegrass Leymus triticoides* Creeping Wild Rye, Rio Melica californica/M. imperfect California/Coast Range Oniongrass Muhlenbergia microsperma Littleseed Deergrass Nassella cernua Nodding Needlegrass Muhlenbergia rigens Deergrass Nassella cernua* Nodding Needlegrass 533 HAWTHORNE PLACE • LIVERMORE, CA 94550 • WWW.PCSEED.COM • 925.373.4417 • FAX 925.373.6855 UP D A T E D O N 4 / 2 / 1 0 A T 4 :0 0 PM CALNATGRASS V- AP 1 0 1 0 . DOC P A GE 1 S EED & S UPPLIES FOR N O R T H E R N C ALIFORNIA Nassella lepida* Foothill Stipa Nassella pulchra* Purple Needlegrass Pleuropogon californica Annual Semaphoregrass Poa secunda Pine Bluegrass Vulpia microstachys Three Weeks Fescue 533 HAWTHORNE PLACE • LIVERMORE, CA 94550 • WWW.PCSEED.COM • 925.373.4417 • FAX 925.373.6855 UP D A T E D O N 4 / 2 / 1 0 A T 4 :0 0 PM CALNATGRASS V- AP 1 0 1 0 .
    [Show full text]
  • Grasses Plant List
    Grasses Plant List California Botanical Name Common Name Water Use Native Aristida purpurea purple three-awn Very Low X Arundinaria gigantea cane reed Low Bothriochloa barbinodis cane bluestem Low X Bouteloua curtipendula sideoats grama Low X Bouteloua gracilis, cvs. blue grama Low X Briza media quaking grass Low Calamagrostis x acutiflora cvs., e.g. Karl feather reed grass Low Foerster Cortaderia selloana cvs. pampas grass Low Deschampsia cespitosa, cvs. tufted hairgrass Low X Distichlis spicata (marsh, reveg.) salt grass Very Low X Elymus condensatus, cvs. (Leymus giant wild rye Low X condensatus) Elymus triticoides (Leymus triticoides) creeping wild rye Low X Eragrostis elliottii 'Tallahassee Sunset' Elliott's lovegrass Low Eragrostis spectabilis purple love grass Low Festuca glauca blue fescue Low Festuca idahoensis, cvs. Idaho fescue Low X Festuca mairei Maire's fescue Low Helictotrichon sempervirens, cvs. blue oat grass Low Hordeum brachyantherum Meadow barley Very Low X Koeleria macrantha (cristata) June grass Low X Melica californica oniongrass Very Low X Melica imperfecta coast range onion grass Very Low X Melica torreyana Torrey's melic Very Low X Muhlenbergia capillaris, cvs. hairy awn muhly Low Muhlenbergia dubia pine muhly Low Muhlenbergia filipes purply muhly Low Muhlenbergia lindheimeri Lindheimer muhly Low Muhlenbergia pubescens soft muhly Low Muhlenbergia rigens deer grass Low X Nassella gigantea giant needle grass Low Panicum spp. panic grass Low Panicum virgatum, cvs. switch grass Low Pennisetum alopecuroides, cvs.
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument
    Schmidt, Drost, Halvorson In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument Plant and Vertebrate Vascular U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center 2255 N. Gemini Drive Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Open-File Report 2006-1163 Southwest Biological Science Center Open-File Report 2006-1163 November 2006 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument By Cecilia A. Schmidt, Charles A. Drost, and William L. Halvorson Open-File Report 2006-1163 November, 2006 USGS Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2006 Note: This document contains information of a preliminary nature and was prepared primarily for internal use in the U.S. Geological Survey. This information is NOT intended for use in open literature prior to publication by the investigators named unless permission is obtained in writing from the investigators named and from the Station Leader. Suggested Citation Schmidt, C. A., C. A. Drost, and W. L. Halvorson 2006. Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Montezuma Castle National Monument. USGS Open-File Report 2006-1163.
    [Show full text]
  • Biology of Bromus Rigidus : Interference in Winter Wheat, Seed
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jean Ann Gleichsner for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy inCrop Sciencepresented on June 27, 1988 . Title: Biology of Bromus rigidus: Interference in Winter Wheat, Seed Longevity in the Soil, and Vernalization Requirements for Flowering Abstract approved:!Redacted for Privacy / 1 Arnold P. Appleby Greenhouse and field studies were conducted to examine various biological aspects of ripgut brome (Bromus rigidus Roth). A field experiment was conducted to measure the grain yield of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Stephens') at various ripgut brome and wheat plant densities. Wheat yield decreased as ripgut brome density increased at all wheat seeding rates (56, 112, 168, and 224 kg/ha). Grain yield was unaffected by wheat seeding rate in the absence of brome. Increasing seeding rates above 112 kg/ha to reduce wheat yield loss caused by ripgut brome is ineffective. In the field, both surface-sown and buried (1 to 30 cm) ripgut brome seed were depleted within 15 months. Persistence of surface-sown seed declined slowly during the first year, falling from 83 to 62 to 23% after 1, 9, and 12 months, respectively. Seed covered by soil, however, germinated more rapidly, with less than 10% of the initial population ungerminated after 1 month at all depths. The mode of seed disappearance was closely related to whether or not seed were covered with soil. Seed loss at depths of 1 to 30 cm was primarily due to germination in situ, with little effect from viability loss or enforced or induced dormancy. In contrast, the persistence of surface-sown seed was due primarily to induced dormancy for up to 12months, with nonviability loss and enforced dormancy becoming important thereafter.
    [Show full text]
  • Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline Common Name Version
    Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline Common Name Version A Photographic Guide Sorted by Form, Color and Family with Habitat Descriptions and Identification Notes Photographs and text by Wilde Legard District Botanist, East Bay Regional Park District New Revised and Expanded Edition - Includes the latest scientific names, habitat descriptions and identification notes Decimal Inches .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .7 .8 .9 1 .5 2 .5 3 .5 4 .5 5 .5 6 .5 7 .5 8 .5 9 1/8 1/4 1/2 3/4 1 1/2 2 1/2 3 1/2 4 1/2 5 1/2 6 1/2 7 1/2 8 1/2 9 English Inches Notes: A Photographic Guide to the Wild Plants of Big Break Regional Shoreline More than 2,000 species of native and naturalized plants grow wild in the San Francisco Bay Area. Most are very difficult to identify without the help of good illustrations. This is designed to be a simple, color photo guide to help you identify some of these plants. This guide is published electronically in Adobe Acrobat® format so that it can easily be updated as additional photographs become available. You have permission to freely download, distribute and print this guide for individual use. Photographs are © 2014 Wilde Legard, all rights reserved. In this guide, the included plants are sorted first by form (Ferns & Fern-like, Grasses & Grass-like, Herbaceous, Woody), then by most common flower color, and finally by similar looking flowers (grouped by genus within each family). Each photograph has the following information, separated by '-': COMMON NAME According to The Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, Second Edition (JM2) and other references (not standardized).
    [Show full text]
  • Oregon City Nuisance Plant List
    Nuisance Plant List City of Oregon City 320 Warner Milne Road , P.O. Box 3040, Oregon City, OR 97045 Phone: (503) 657-0891, Fax: (503) 657-7892 Scientific Name Common Name Acer platanoides Norway Maple Acroptilon repens Russian knapweed Aegopodium podagraria and variegated varieties Goutweed Agropyron repens Quack grass Ailanthus altissima Tree-of-heaven Alliaria officinalis Garlic Mustard Alopecuris pratensis Meadow foxtail Anthoxanthum odoratum Sweet vernalgrass Arctium minus Common burdock Arrhenatherum elatius Tall oatgrass Bambusa sp. Bamboo Betula pendula lacinata Cutleaf birch Brachypodium sylvaticum False brome Bromus diandrus Ripgut Bromus hordeaceus Soft brome Bromus inermis Smooth brome-grasses Bromus japonicus Japanese brome-grass Bromus sterilis Poverty grass Bromus tectorum Cheatgrass Buddleia davidii (except cultivars and varieties) Butterfly bush Callitriche stagnalis Pond water starwort Cardaria draba Hoary cress Carduus acanthoides Plumeless thistle Carduus nutans Musk thistle Carduus pycnocephalus Italian thistle Carduus tenufolius Slender flowered thistle Centaurea biebersteinii Spotted knapweed Centaurea diffusa Diffuse knapweed Centaurea jacea Brown knapweed Centaurea pratensis Meadow knapweed Chelidonium majou Lesser Celandine Chicorum intybus Chicory Chondrilla juncea Rush skeletonweed Cirsium arvense Canada Thistle Cirsium vulgare Common Thistle Clematis ligusticifolia Western Clematis Clematis vitalba Traveler’s Joy Conium maculatum Poison-hemlock Convolvulus arvensis Field Morning-glory 1 Nuisance Plant List
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • Native Perennial and Non-Native Annual Grasses Shape Pathogen Community Composition and Disease Severity in a California Grassland”, Kendig Et Al
    Supplementary Materials for “Native perennial and non-native annual grasses shape pathogen community composition and disease severity in a California grassland”, Kendig et al. Table S1. Total abundance of grass species in the observational and manipulated studies. Study Year Grass species Abundance Host group observational 2015 Avena barbata 2114 non-native annual observational 2015 Avena fatua 1865 non-native annual observational 2015 Brachypodium distachyon 2801 non-native annual observational 2015 Bromus diandrus 2429 non-native annual observational 2015 Bromus hordeaceus 9112 non-native annual observational 2015 Bromus sterilis 178 non-native annual observational 2015 Elymus glaucus 72 native perennial observational 2015 Festuca myuros 116 non-native annual observational 2015 Festuca perennis 652 other grass (non-native perennial) observational 2015 Phalaris aquatica 88 other grass (non-native perennial) observational 2015 Stipa pulchra 127 native perennial observational 2016 Avena sp.1 1076 non-native annual observational 2016 Brachypodium distachyon 1533 non-native annual observational 2016 Bromus diandrus 983 non-native annual observational 2016 Bromus hordeaceus 3235 non-native annual observational 2016 Elymus glaucus 70 native perennial observational 2016 Stipa pulchra 84 native perennial observational 2016 unidentified grass 160 other grass manipulated 2016 Avena sp.1 1559 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Brachypodium distachyon 5941 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Bromus diandrus 854 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Bromus hordeaceus 15076 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Elymus glaucus 1325 native perennial manipulated 2016 Festuca myuros 199 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Gastridium phleoides 15 non-native annual manipulated 2016 Stipa pulchra 286 native perennial 1Identified Avena sp. at JRBP include A. barbata and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Needlegrass Notes Volume 56:2 Summer 2010
    Needlegrass Notes Volume 56:2 Summer 2010 Society for Range Management California-Pacific Section President’s Message Jim Sullins Time has flown by and as your Section President this year, I have had several rewarding opportunities, and I thank you for Your 2010 Section those opportunities to be of service to the Section and to grow Officers & Board personally and professionally. As one of the older folks now, it President: Jim Sullins [email protected] seems ironic to talk about growing (besides adding pounds), (559) 685-3309 ext. 209 but that is what being involved in the society does for us pro- President-Elect: Susan Marshall fessionally and personally, it promotes our continuing growth [email protected] (707) 826-4064 no matter how long you have been at it. Past-President: Rob Pearce [email protected] The May 4, 2010 Spring meeting at Deep Springs was great, (760) 872-6111 Rob and his crew did an excellent job, and the food was great, the technical session Secretary: Sheila Barry was very well done and the food was great, and the tour was very informative and [email protected] (408) 282-3106 the food was great, it was fun camping out and getting to know some of the new Treasurer: Edie Jacobsen members and did I mention the food was great? Deep Springs College must be a [email protected] (619) 532-3618 one of a kind based on location, curriculum, students, and staff leadership. Built on Newsletter Editors: the three principles of Labor, Education and Self-Governance, it was hard to miss Morgan Doran (content) that it is a special place, and I want to thank Rob for making the arrangements and [email protected] (707) 784-1326 all that participated in making the meeting a success.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Heterogeneity and the Distribution of Native Grasses in California: Can Soil Properties Inform Restoration Plans? 1, KRISTINA M
    Soil heterogeneity and the distribution of native grasses in California: Can soil properties inform restoration plans? 1, KRISTINA M. HUFFORD, SUSAN J. MAZER, AND JOSHUA P. S CHIMEL Ecology, Evolution and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106 USA Citation: Hufford, K. M., S. J. Mazer, and J. P. Schimel. 2014. Soil heterogeneity and the distribution of native grasses in California: Can soil properties inform restoration plans? Ecosphere 5(4):46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00377.1 Abstract. When historical vegetation patterns are unknown and local environments are highly degraded, the relationship between plant species distributions and environmental properties may provide a means to determine which species are suitable for individual restoration sites. We investigated the role of edaphic variation in explaining the distributions of three native bunchgrass species (Bromus carinatus, Elymus glaucus and Nassella pulchra) among central California mainland and island grasslands. The relative contribution of soil properties and spatial variation to native grass species abundance was estimated using canonical redundancy analysis, with subsequent testing of individual variables identified in ordination. Soil variables predicted a significant proportion (22–27%) of the variation in species distributions. Abiotic soil properties that drive species distributions included serpentine substrates and soil texture. Biotic properties that correlated with species distributions were ammonium and nitrogen mineralization rates. Spatial autocorrelation also contributed to species presence or absence at each site, and the significant negative autocorrelation suggested that species interactions and niche differentiation may play a role in species distributions in central California mainland and island grasslands. We explored the application of plant-environment relationships to ecological restoration for species selection at locations where degradation levels are high and historical communities are unclear.
    [Show full text]
  • California Native Sod SELECTION GUIDE
    California Native Sod SELECTION GUIDE Once Established, All Blends Will Require Approximatelytely 50% Less Water Than Traditional Sod Varieties Distributed by All Blends Available on Biodegradable Netting Urban Landscapes / Parks / Golf Courses / Streetscapes Native Mow Free TM A low maintenance compliment to ­ Contains two native fine fescues and one highly natural landscapes. This versatile grass naturalized variety can be maintained as a turf lawn or left unmowed. ­ Excellent shade and cold tolerance ­ Deep green glossy leaves • Western Mokelumne Fescue - Festuca ­ Slow growing, narrow leafed grass with blades occidentalis • Idaho Fescue - Festuca idahoensis that are very lax and flexuous • Molate Fescue - Festuca rubra ­ Provides soil stabilization for sloped areas Native Bentgrass TM The industry’s 1st choice for native ­ Uniform growth habit and medium leaf texture lawn areas. Native Bentgrass™ delivers ­ Thrives in full sun and partial shade excellent durability, exceptional recovery and a dark green turf mat. ­ Withstands low mowing heights ­ Strong sod mat provides effective weed barrier • Agrostis pallens ­ Extremely drought tolerant ­ Excellent wear recovery due to self repairing rhizomes Delta Grassland Mix TM A premium soft grass with botanical ­ Narrow fine leafed texture emerald green color. Provides a ­ Moderate wear resistance unique contrast when planted in ornamental settings. ­ Slow growing, tuft forming, clumping grass ­ Persists under drought conditions • Junegrass - Koeleria macrantha ­ Prefers to grow in partial
    [Show full text]
  • Pollen Morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/283696832 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal ARTICLE in GRANA · OCTOBER 2015 Impact Factor: 1.06 · DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 READS 33 4 AUTHORS, INCLUDING: Vania Gonçalves-Esteves Maria A. Ventura Federal University of Rio de Janeiro University of the Azores 86 PUBLICATIONS 141 CITATIONS 43 PUBLICATIONS 44 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Maria A. Ventura letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 10 December 2015 Grana ISSN: 0017-3134 (Print) 1651-2049 (Online) Journal homepage: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/sgra20 Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura To cite this article: Leila Nunes Morgado, Vania Gonçalves-Esteves, Roberto Resendes & Maria Anunciação Mateus Ventura (2015) Pollen morphology of Poaceae (Poales) in the Azores, Portugal, Grana, 54:4, 282-293, DOI: 10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00173134.2015.1096301 Published online: 04 Nov 2015. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 13 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=sgra20 Download by: [b-on: Biblioteca do conhecimento
    [Show full text]