DOCSLIB.ORG

Spherical Tokamak Plasma Science & Fusion Energy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spherical Tokamak Plasma Science & Fusion Energy Supported by Columbia U Comp-X General Atomics Spherical Tokamak Plasma Science INEL Johns Hopkins U LANL LLNL & Fusion Energy Lodestar MIT Nova Photonics NYU ORNL PPPL PSI SNL Martin Peng UC Davis UC Irvine UCLA NSTX Program Director UCSD U Maryland Oak Ridge National Laboratory U New Mexico U Rochester @ Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory U Washington U Wisconsin Culham Sci Ctr Hiroshima U HIST Kyushu Tokai U Niigata U Second Japan-Korea Seminar on Advanced Tsukuba U U Tokyo Diagnostics for Steady-State Fusion Plasma JAERI Ioffe Inst TRINITI KBSI Korea Basic Science Institute (KBSI) KAIST ENEA, Frascati August 25-27, 2004 CEA, Cadarache IPP, Jülich Daejon, Korea IPP, Garching U Quebec JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Spherical Tokamak (ST) Offers Rich Plasma Science Opportunities and High Fusion Energy Potential • What is ST and why? • Scientific opportunities of ST • How does shape determine pressure? • How does turbulence enhance transport? • How do plasma particles and waves interact? • How do hot plasmas interact with walls? • How to supply magnetic flux without solenoid? • Contributions to burning plasmas and ITER • Cost-effective steps to fusion energy • Collaboration JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Tokamak Theory in Early 1980’s Showed Maximum Stable βT Increased with Lowered Aspect Ratio (A) • A. Sykes et al. (1983); F. Troyon et al. (1984) on maximum stable toroidal beta βT: βTmax = C Ip / a 〈B〉≈5 C κ / A qj; 〈B〉≈BT at standard A C ≈ constant (~ 3 %m·T/MA) ⇒βN Z Plasma 〈B〉 = volume average B ⇒ B Cross T Section κ = b/a = elongation b A = R /a = aspect ratio a a 0 0 R R qI ≈ average safety factor 0 Ip = toroidal plasma current BT ≈ applied toroidal field at R0 • Peng & Strickler (1986): What would happen to tokamak as A → 1? − How would βN, κ, qj, change as functions of A? JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Minimizing Tokamak Aspect Ratio Maximizes Field Line Length in Good Curvature ⇒ High β Stability Good Curvature Bad Curvature Magnetic Surface Magnetic Field Line Spherical Tokamak (ST) Tokamak Compact Toroid (CT) Small-R close to Tokamak & large-R close to CT. JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion ST Plasma Elongates Naturally, Needs Less TF & PF Coil Currents, Increases Ip/aBT, and Increases βTmax Natural Elongation, κ Small Coil Currents/Ip (qedge~2.5) A = 1.5 A = 2.5 ITF / Ip κ≈2.0 κ≈1.4 (~aBT / Ip) Z ΣIPF / Ip κ 0 RRST ATokamak • Naturally increased κ ~ 2; ITF < Ip, IPF < Ip ⇒ higher Ip; lower device cost • Increased Ip/aBT ~ 7 MA/m·T ⇒βTmax ~ 20%, if βN ~ 3 • Increased Ip qedge /aBT ~ 20 MA/m·T ⇒ improved confinement? JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Very Low Aspect Ratio (A) Introduces New Opportunities to Broaden Toroidal Plasma Science How does shape determine pressure? ST Plasmas Extends • Strong plasma shaping & self fields Toroidal Parameters (vertical elongation ≤ 3, Bp/Bt ~ 1) • Very high βT (~ 40%), βN & fBootstrap A = R/a can be ≥ 1.1 How does turbulence enhance transport? • Small plasma size relative to gyro-radius (a/ρi~30–50) • Large plasma flow (MA = Vrotation/VA ≤ 0.3) 6 • Large flow shearing rate (γExB ≤ 10 /s) How do plasma particles and waves interact? • Supra-Alfvénic fast ions (Vfast/VA ~ 4–5) 2 2 • High dielectric constant (ε = ωpe /ωce ~ 50) How do plasmas interact with walls? • Large mirror ratio in edge B field (fT → 1) • Strong field line expansion How to supply mag flux without solenoid? START – UKAEA Fusion • Small magnetic flux content (~ liR0Ip) JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion ST Research Is Growing Worldwide Concept Exploration (~0.3 MA) Proof of Principle (~MA) HIT-II (US) Pegasus (US) MAST (UK) Globus-M NSTX (US) Pegasus MAST HIT-II START Proto-Sphera TS-3,4 HIT-I NSTX SUNLIST TST-M CDX-U HIST, LATE ETE Rotamak-ST CDX-U (US) Globus-M (RF) ETE (B) SUNIST (PRC) HIST (J) TST-2 (J) TS-4 (J) TS-3 (J) JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Pegasus Explores ST Regimes As Aspect Ratio → 1 JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion NSTX Exceeded Troyon Scaling at Higher Ip/aBT Indicating Better Field and Size Utilization at Low A • Obtained high beta values: NSTX Design & Operation Goals 2 βT =2µ0〈p〉 /BT0 ≤ 38% βN = βT / (Ip/aBT0) ≤ 6.4 2 〈β〉 = 2µ0〈p〉 / 〈B 〉≤20% fBS ~ 70% • To produce and study full non- β ~ 8 N inductive sustained plasmas fBS ≤ 50% – Relevant to DEMO βN ≤ 6 • Nearly sustained plasmas with neutral beam and bootstrap current – Relevant to ITER hybrid mode – Nearly basis for neutral beam sustained ST Component Test Facility (CTF) at Q~2 JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 Columbia U, LANL, PPPL ST Science & Fusion Detailed Measurements of Plasma Profiles Allows Physics Analysis and Interpretations Plasma Flow Shearing Rate up to ~106 /s JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Strong Plasma Flow (MA=Vφ/VAlfvén~0.3) Has Large Effects on Equilibrium and Stability Equilibrium Reconstruction • Internal MHD modes with Flow stops growing pressure surfaces 2 • Pressure axis shifts magnetic surfaces out by ~10% of outer minor radius • Density axis shifts by 1 ~20% 107540 1.4 T (keV) 0 e 330ms Z(m) 1.2 1.0 0.8 -3 -1 0.6 ne (m ) 19 0.4 4x10 MA 0.2 0.0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 -2 R(m) 0.51.0 1.5 2.0 Columbia U, GA, PPPL, U Rochester R(m) JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion High-Resolution CHERS, SXR, and In-Vessel BR and BP Sensors Reveal Strong Mode-Rotation Interaction In-vessel sensors measure SXR shows rotating 1/1 rotating mode as vφ decays mode during v decay CHarge-Exchange Recom- before mode locking φ bination Spectroscopy (CHERS) shows vφ collapse preceding β collapse Aliased n=1 rotating mode 1/1 Island Sabbagh, Bell, Menard, Stutman RWM, NTM, 1/1 modes, and rotation physics of high interest to ITER JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Active Control Will Enable Study of Wall Mode Interactions with Error Fields & Rotation at High βT ) -1 Vacuum Vessel Conducting Plates Resistive Wall Mode Growth Rate (s Internal Sensors Columbia U, GA, PPPL JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Global and Thermal τE’s Compare Favorably with Higher A Database 0.10 120 H-mode .5 L-mode 2 x .5 80 x1 (ms) [s] 0.05 <mag> E τ 40 <thermal> E τ 0.00 0 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0 40 80 120 τ <ITER-97L> [s] <ITER-H98p(y,2)> E τE (ms) • Compare with ITER scaling for total • TRANSP analysis for thermal confinement, including fast ions confinement L-modes have higher non-thermal component and comparable τE! Why? JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 Bell, Kaye, PPPL ST Science & Fusion Ion Internal Transport Barrier in Beam-Heated H-Mode Contrasts Improved Electron Confinement in L-Mode iITB? Transport Kinetic Profile Local Error Sampling Barrier region where NC χi ~ χi Regions requiring and improved χe >> χi data resolution iITB? Axis Edge But L-mode plasmas show improved electron confinement! Why? ) L-mode 3 H-mode /cm 13 L-mode (keV) Magnetic Axis e H-mode (10 T e n JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 Columbia U, Culham, ORNL, PPPL ST Science & Fusion Analysis Shows Stability to Modes at Ion Gyro-Scale & Strong Instability at Electron Gyro-Scale (H-Mode) ) 3 Core Transport In ion confinement MHD event Physics zone Ne 8,9+ Thermal • χion ~ χneoclassical Conductivity • χelec >> χion Impurity •D ~ D (mW/cmEmissivity imp neoclassical R ( Diffusivity cm ) ) t (ms • Driven by T and n Micro- uff Ne p instability gradients iITB? calculations •kθρi < 1 (ion gyro- scale) stable or suppressed by Vφ shear •kθρi >> 1 (electron gyro-scale) strongly unstable JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 Cadarache, JHU, PPPL, U. Maryland ST Science & Fusion In MAST, However, Counter NBI Reduces Electron Energy Loss Co-NBI Counter-NBI 1.5 5 1.5 5 High flow shear scenario on T i MAST (Co- & Counter-NBI) 4 4 Te 1.0 n 1.0 • Counter-NBI produces stronger e ] 3 3 -3 ω ~ 106 s-1 and strong local m SE 19 [keV] 2 2 reduction in χe at broader radius 0.5 0.5 [10 • Pressure gradient contribution to 1 1 Er reinforces that due to Vφ with .2 s #8302, 0.2 s 0.0 0 0.0 0 ctr-NBI 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ρ ρ • Strong ExB flow shear and weak 100 100 magnetic shear s ~ 0 produced #88575, 0.2 s #8302,#830 0.2 s by NBI heating during current ramp 10 10 ] -1 • With co-NBI ion thermal transport s 2 NC reduced to N.C. level χi ~ χi [m 1.0 1.0 with weaker reduction in χe χ χφ i • Strong ExB flow shear ωSE > χ χ NCN e i γ ITG and s ~ 0 at minimum of χ 0.1 0.1 m i,e 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 ρ ρ JKS2004-Aug25-27/04 ST Science & Fusion Detailed Diagnosis and Gyrokinetic Analysis of β ~ 1 Turbulence Has Broad Scientific Importance Can k¦ρι ≥ 1 turbulence at β ~ 1 be understood? Armitage (U. Colorado) Region to be tested Gyrokinetic turbulence simulation in accretion disk of supermassive black hole at galactic center, assuming damping of turbulence by plasma ions vs.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Physique Nucléaire Et De L'instrumentation Associée Introduction
    FR0108546 # DEA-DAPNIA-RA-1997-98 A il. ..33/04 -DSM Département d'Astrophysique, de physique des Particules, de physique Nucléaire et de l'Instrumentation Associée Introduction Motivés par la curiosité pour les connaissances fondamentales et soutenus par des investissements impor- tants, les chercheurs du vingtième siècle ont fait des découvertes scientifiques considérables, sources de retombées économiques fructueuses. Une recherche ambitieuse doit se poursuivre. Organisé pour déve- lopper les grands programmes pour le nucléaire et par le nucléaire, le CEA est bien armé pour concevoir et mettre au point les instruments destinés à explorer, en coopération avec les autres organismes de recherche, les confins de l'infiniment petit et ceux de l'infinimenf grand. La recherche fondamentale évolue et par essence ne doit pas avoir de frontières. Le Département d'astrophysique, de physique des particules, de physique nucléaire et de l'instrumentation associée (Dapnia) a été créé pour abolir les cloisons entre la physique nucléaire, la physique des particules et l'as- trophysique, tout en resserrant les liens entre physiciens, ingénieurs et techniciens au sein de la Direction des sciences de la matière (DSM). Le Dapnia est unique par sa pluridisciplinarité. Ce regroupement a permis de lancer des expériences se situant aux frontières de ces disciplines tout en favorisant de nou- velles orientations et les choix vers les programmes les plus prometteurs. Tout en bénéficiant de l'expertise d'autres départements du CEA, la recherche au Dapnia se fait princi- palement au sein de collaborations nationales et internationales. Les équipes du Dapnia, de I'IN2P3 (Institut national de physique nucléaire et de physique des particules) et de l'Insu (Institut national des sciences de l'Univers) se retrouvent dans de nombreuses grandes collaborations internationales, chacun apportant ses compétences spécifiques afin de renforcer l'impact de nos contributions.
    [Show full text]
  • Topical Review Solenoid-Free Plasma Start-Up in Spherical Tokamaks
    Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience Solenoid-free plasma start-up in spherical tokamaks This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. 2014 Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 56 103001 (http://iopscience.iop.org/0741-3335/56/10/103001) View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more Download details: IP Address: 198.125.233.17 This content was downloaded on 06/01/2015 at 20:20 Please note that terms and conditions apply. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 56 (2014) 103001 (19pp) doi:10.1088/0741-3335/56/10/103001 Topical Review Solenoid-free plasma start-up in spherical tokamaks R Raman1 and V F Shevchenko2 1 William E. Boeing Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA 2 CCFE, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 3DB, UK E-mail: [email protected] Received 15 June 2014, revised 20 August 2014 Accepted for publication 1 September 2014 Published 22 September 2014 Abstract The central solenoid is an intrinsic part of all present-day tokamaks and most spherical tokamaks. The spherical torus (ST) confinement concept is projected to operate at high toroidal beta and at a high fraction of the non-inductive bootstrap current as required for an efficient reactor system. The use of a conventional solenoid in a ST-based fusion nuclear facility is generally believed to not be a possibility. Solenoid-free plasma start-up is therefore an area of extensive worldwide research activity.
    [Show full text]
  • UST 1 Stellarator and Status of the 3D Printed UST 2 Stellarator* on Leave of Absence Vicente from NFL, Queral CIEMAT L 1 Outline
    UST_1 stellarator and Status of the 3D printed UST_2 stellarator Vicente M. Queral * Talk given in Columbia University, New York, NY, USA 1st October 2013 TM UST_1 stellarator and status of the 3D printed UST_2 stellarator* On leave of absence Vicente from NFL, Queral CIEMAT L 1 Outline Background Basic UST_1 and UST_2 data Design, construction and results in UST_1 ▪ Conceptual design of UST_1 ▪ Engineering design. Development of a construction method ▪ Validation of the construction method and design ▪ Results and conclusions Status of the 3D printed UST_2 stellarator ▪ Experimental validation of engineering concepts ▪ Conceptual design ▪ UST_2 engineering design. Fabrication tests ▪ Future work UST_1 stellarator and status of the 3D printed UST_2 stellarator Vicente Queral L 2 Background ► I am on a leave of absence period from the National Fusion Laboratory, CIEMAT, Spain. ► I worked in CIEMAT for almost 5 years, in Remote Handling, for IFMIF (International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility), ITER and DEMO. ► Up to now, I have developed the work on stellarators on my own, with personal funds (for three years before CIEMAT work, at nights and weekends during CIEMAT work, and now 1.5 years during the leave of absence), with some help and contribution from CIEMAT. ► The work is R&D and innovation in engineering, focused in new construction methods for stellarators. It is not focused on physics and plasma experiments. UST_1 stellarator and status of the 3D printed UST_2 stellarator Vicente Queral L 3 Basic UST_1 data UST_1 modular stellarator • UST_1 stellarator was designed, built and operated from 2005 to 2007 in my personal laboratory. • Cost of the whole facility ~ 3000 € (many 2nd hand pieces).
    [Show full text]
  • Physics and Computational Simulations of Plasma Burn-Through for Tokamak Start-Up
    Imperial College London Department of Physics Physics and Computational Simulations of Plasma Burn-through for Tokamak Start-up Hyun-Tae Kim Submitted in part fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics of Imperial College London, July 2013 Abstract This thesis will discuss the fundamental process of high temperature plasma formation, con- sisting of the Townsend avalanche phase and the subsequent plasma burn-through phase. By means of the applied electric field, the gas is partially ionized by the avalanche process. In order for the electron temperature to increase, the remaining neutrals need to be fully ionized in the plasma burn-through phase, as radiation is the main contribution to the electron power loss. The radiated power loss can be significantly affected by impurities resulting from inter- action with the plasma facing components. The parallel transport to the surrounding walls is determined by the so called connection length in the plasma. Previously, plasma burn-through was simulated with the assumptions of constant particle con- finement time and impurity fraction. In the new plasma burn-through simulator, called the DYON code, the treatment of particle confinement time is improved with a transonic ambipo- lar model for parallel transport, by using the effective connection length determined by the magnetic field lines, and Bohm diffusion model for perpendicular transport. In addition, the dynamic evolution of impurity content is calculated in a self-consistent way, using plasma wall interaction models. The recycling of the particles at the walls is also modelled. For a specific application, the recent installation of a beryllium wall at Joint European Torus (JET) enabled to investigate the effects of plasma facing components on plasma formation and build-up of plasma current in the device.
    [Show full text]
  • Soltan Institute for Nuclear Studies Annual Report 1995
    ISSN 1232-5309 SOLTAN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES INSTYTUT PROBLEMdW JADROWYCH im. A. SOtTANA PL9701895 ANNUAL REPORT 1995 Otwock - Swierk 19 9 6 ISSN 1232-5309 SOLTAN INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR STUDIES ANNUAL REPORT 1995 Editors: E. Infeld M. Jaskdla P. Zuprariski PL-05-400 OTWOCK-SWIERK, POLAND Tel: 048-22-779 8948 Telex: 813244 IBJ swpl Fax: 048-22-779 3481 E-mail: [email protected] Otwock - Swierk 1996 Technical Editor: Krystyna Traczyk Technical Staff: Jolanta Falkowska Danuta Szczepaniak The Report was printed using a Word Perfect 6,0 word processor on a PC 486/40 and a Hewlett Packard LaserJet 5P SINS Annual Report 1995 1 ABSTRACT: This report surveys our activities in the following fields: nuclear, particle and cosmic ray physics, plasma and thermonuclear research and techniques, nuclear electronics, accelerator techniques and physics, as well as ionizing radiation detection and spectrometry techniques, developmental work and implementations resulting from chosen trends in nuclear physics* 1. STRESZCZENIE: Raport roczny Instytutu Problemdw Jqdrowych im. A.Sottana przedstawia zwi$zfy przeglqd badan teoretycznych, doswiadczalnych, technologicznych i technicznych z dziedziny fizyki jqdrowej, promieniowania kosmicznego, fizyki czqstek elementarnych, fizyki plazmy, elektroniki jqdrowej, detektorow gazowych i pdfprzewodnikowych, fizyki i techniki akceleratorow, fizyki oslon przed promieniowaniem i mikrodozymetrii" 1. *) This work was supported in part by the State Committee for Scientific Research in Poland, Decision Nr 621/E-78/S/95 **) Badania byiy finansowane glownie przez Komitet Badan Naukowych w Polsce wedfug Decyzji Nr 621/E-78/S/95 2 SINS Annual Report 1995 CONTENTS FOREWORD............................................................................................................................................. 3 I. GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................ 5 II. MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTITUTE..............................
    [Show full text]
  • M Ono Presentation ICEF 2016 V4.Pptx
    Spherical Tokamak for Economical Fusion Energy Development Masayuki Ono NSTX-U Department Head PPPL, Princeton University PPPL Innovation for Cool Earth Forum October 5 - 6, 2016 M. Ono ICEF 2016 October 5, 2016 Fusion for safe limitless energy source Fusion could provide energy for Energy 10 million times that of fossil fuel by weight future mankind: D + T He4 + n + 17.6 MeV - Environmentally friendly Heat from fusion reactor can also produce hydrogen! - Safe - Globally abundant fuel - High energy density - Support hydrogen economy Global Warming Nuclear spent fuel A large asteroid / comet hit Earh 65 million years ago Annual CO2 release – 40 billion tons Still increasing 8,000 tons per year M. Ono ICEF 2016 October 5, 2016 2 Fusion for safe limitless energy source Fusion can also solve potential challenges for humanity Fusion could provide energy for Energy 10 million times that of fossil fuel by weight future mankind: D + T He4 + n + 17.6 MeV - Environmentally friendly Heat from fusion reactor can also produce hydrogen! - Safe - Globally abundant fuel - High energy density - Support hydrogen economy Fusion could help solve future challenges facing mankind: - Global warming - Fission reactor spent fuel - Space travel Global Warming Nuclear spent fuel A large asteroid / comet hit Earh 65 million years ago Annual CO2 release – 40 billion tons Still increasing 8,000 tons per year M. Ono ICEF 2016 October 5, 2016 3 Nuclear Fusion has many possible approaches Many Types of Magnetic Bottles! Beta is a ratio of plasma pressure over magnetic pressure - Plasma pressure produces fusion power - Mangetic pressure provided by coils but cost $ Tokamak Tri-Alpha NSTX-U Energy (Private) (US-DOE) A Modern Conventional Spherical (Private) Compact Stellarator Tokamak Tokamak Toroids Very Low B Axi-symmettric High beta Ip / IC ~ 0 Ip / IC ~ 0.1 Ip / IC ~ 1 Ip / IC > 1 LHD, W7-X TFTR, JET, JT-60, ITER NSTX, MAST.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L
    The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion L. J. Reinders The Fairy Tale of Nuclear Fusion 123 L. J. Reinders Panningen, The Netherlands ISBN 978-3-030-64343-0 ISBN 978-3-030-64344-7 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64344-7 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and information in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland When you are studying any matter or considering any philosophy, ask yourself only what are the facts and what is the truth that the facts bear out.
    [Show full text]
  • Programa Nuclear Brasileiro Proposta De Programa Nacional De Fusão
    PROGRAMA NUCLEAR BRASILEIRO PROPOSTA DE PROGRAMA NACIONAL DE FUSÃO NUCLEAR Maio de 2021 Este documento propõe um Programa Nacional de Fusão Nuclear e foi elaborado por iniciativa da Diretoria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento da CNEN, por meio de sua Coordenação-Geral de Ciência e Tecnologia Nucleares, em uma série de reuniões conduzidas em 2020 e 2021. Comissão Nacional de Energia Nuclear - CNEN Paulo Roberto Pertusi, Presidente da CNEN Diretoria de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento - DPD/CNEN Madison Coelho de Almeida, Diretor de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Coordenação-Geral de Ciência e Tecnologia Nucleares - CGTN/CNEN Orlando João Agostinho Gonçalves Filho, Coordenador Geral Autores Gustavo Paganini Canal, IFUSP Gerson Otto Ludwig, CNEN/INPE Ricardo Magnus Osório Galvão, IFUSP Co-autores Madison Coelho de Almeida, DPD/CNEN Orlando João Agostinho Gonçalves Filho, CGTN/CNEN José Helder Facundo Severo, IFUSP Maria Célia Ramos de Andrade, COPDT-INPE Júlio Guimarães Ferreira, COPDT-INPE Conteúdo 1 Introdução 1 2 A geração de energia através da fusão nuclear 2 2.1 A necessidade de encontrarmos novas fontes de energia .............................. 2 2.2 A produção de energia através da fusão de núcleos leves ............................. 3 2.3 Fusão nuclear por confinamento magnético .................................................. 4 2.4 O conceito de uma usina de energia a fusão .................................................. 6 3 O desenvolvimento da fusão nuclear no mundo 9 3.1 O projeto ITER ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Analysis of Alfvén Wave Antenna Implementation in the ETE Spherical Tokamak
    1722 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 34, no. 4B, December, 2004 The Analysis of Alfven´ Wave Antenna Implementation in the ETE Spherical Tokamak L. F. Ruchko and R. M. O. Galvao˜ Institute of Physics, University of Sao˜ Paulo, CEP 05315-970, Sao˜ Paulo, SP, Brazil Received on 2 February, 2004; revised version received on 29 April, 2004 The preliminary design study of the Alfven´ wave system for the ETE spherical tokamak is presented. The main objective of the proposed RF system is generation of travelling Alfven´ waves, which can be used for the study of the non-inductive current drive and the plasma heating in a wide range of operational regimes, which are specific for tokamaks with small aspect ratio R=a ' 1:2 ¡ 1:5. The antenna system consists of four modules, which are separated by 90± in toroidal direction. Each module has two sets of RF current carrying poloidal straps that are positioned symmetrically in relation to the equatorial plane of the vacuum chamber at the poloidal coordinates §45±. The poloidal extension of each strap is approximately 90±. The excited mode numbers can be controlled by the phasing of the feeding RF current. In the basic regime of operation, the straps in the same toroidal cross-sections are fed by the RF currents with (0; §¼=2) phasing so that they can excite travelling modes M = §1, N = §1. In order to decrease the periphery RF power deposition and to improve the selectivity of the Alfven´ mode excitation, the inclination of the antenna straps in toroidal direction can be adjusted in the range of angles §30±.
    [Show full text]
  • Physics of Plasma Burn-Through and DYON Simulations for the JET ITER-Like Wall
    PAPER Related content - Plasma burn-through simulations using the Physics of plasma burn-through and DYON DYON code and predictions for ITER Hyun-Tae Kim, A C C Sips, P C de Vries simulations for the JET ITER-like wall et al. - Enhancement of plasma burn-through simulation and validation in JET To cite this article: Hyun-Tae Kim et al 2013 Nucl. Fusion 53 083024 Hyun-Tae Kim, W. Fundamenski, A.C.C. Sips et al. - Characterisation of plasma breakdown at JET with a carbon and ITER-like wall P.C. de Vries, A.C.C. Sips, H.T. Kim et al. View the article online for updates and enhancements. Recent citations - Plasma production and preliminary results from the ADITYA Upgrade tokamak R L TANNA et al - Pre-ionization by AC Ohmic coil operation in the TST-2 spherical tokamak A. Ejiri et al - 0-D modeling of SST-1 plasma break- down & start-up using ECRH assisted pre- ionization Aveg Kumar and Subrata Pradhan This content was downloaded from IP address 194.81.223.66 on 19/09/2018 at 09:55 IOP PUBLISHING and INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY NUCLEAR FUSION Nucl. Fusion 53 (2013) 083024 (16pp) doi:10.1088/0029-5515/53/8/083024 Physics of plasma burn-through and DYON simulations for the JET ITER-like wall Hyun-Tae Kim1,2, A.C.C. Sips1,3 and EFDA-JET Contributorsa JET-EFDA Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK 1 Department of Physics, Imperial College London, Prince Consort Road, London, SW7 2AZ, UK 2 EURATOM/CCFE Fusion Association, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK 3 JET/EFDA, Culham Science Centre, Abingdon, OX14 3DB, UK E-mail: [email protected] Received 14 December 2012, accepted for publication 10 June 2013 Published 24 July 2013 Online at stacks.iop.org/NF/53/083024 Abstract This paper presents the DYON simulations of the plasma burn-through phase at Joint European Torus (JET) with the ITER-like wall.
    [Show full text]
  • Burning-Plasma Diagnostics: Need for Radiation- Hardened Detectors & Electronics
    Burning-plasma diagnostics: need for radiation- hardened detectors & electronics Luis F. Delgado-Aparicio Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) 31st RD50 Workshop on Radiation hard semiconductor devices for very high luminosity colliders CERN, November, 20-22, 2017, Geneva, Switzerland L. F. Delgado-Aparicio, 31st RD50 Workshop, CERN, 11/20-22/2017, Geneva, Switzerland 1 Outline ① PPPL and fusion basics ② ITER and diagnostics ③ Neutron and gamma-induced noise ④ The x-ray case (x3) ⑤ Synergies between FES and with HEP (e.g. CERN’s RD50) ⑥ TESTS at the appropriate neutron energies ⑦ Summary L. F. Delgado-Aparicio, 31st RD50 Workshop, CERN, 11/20-22/2017, Geneva, Switzerland 2 PPPL: Princeton Plasma Physics Lab • PPPL is one of 17 DoE national laboratories. • We are managed by PU but have a government mandate that focuses on fusion energy research and basic plasma science. L. F. Delgado-Aparicio, 31st RD50 Workshop, CERN, 11/20-22/2017, Geneva, Switzerland 3 At PPPL, we try to understand many aspects of plasma physics Fusion Research Basic plasma physics Plasma theory and simulation Astrophysical plasmas Plasma in other fields (e.g. medicine/nano-materials) L. F. Delgado-Aparicio, 31st RD50 Workshop, CERN, 11/20-22/2017, Geneva, Switzerland 4 Why is fusion research our main mission? It is simple: an abundant energy source ! ① Energy is central to achieving sustainable development for the human race. ② The standard of living is directly proportional to our energy consumption. ③ The world will demand an energy usage of at least double the present energy consumption by 2050! ④ How bad is the energy problem? ⑤ At the present rates, the conventional coal, oil and natural gas resources will only last for the next ~300, ~40 and ~50 years, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1. Introduction Magnetic Fusion Technology
    Chapter 1. Introduction Magnetic Fusion Technology Thomas J. Dolan NPRE 421 University of Illinois 2011 dolan 2010 1 Some Forms of Energy Dolan - Energy Sources 2 Some Forms of Energy Dolan - Energy Sources 3 Energy usage in the USA Industrial 41 % Transportation 25 % Residential 19 % Commercial 14 % Dolan - Energy Sources 4 Energy to agriculture and manufacturing ~ 8 Joules (tractor, chemicals, transportation) One Joule of food Processing energy costs are > 30% of following product costs: •steel •aluminum •glass •cement •paper. dolan 2010 5 GDP vs. Energy Cosumption 103 $/cap 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 kW/cap AG = Argentina, AL = Australia, AU = Austria, BR = Brazil, CA = Canada, CH = China, CZ = Czech, DE = Germany, FR = France, GR = Greece, HU = Hungary, ID = Indonesia, IN = India, .IR = Iran, IT = Italy, JA = Japan, MX = Mexico, NO = Norway, PK = Pakistan, RU = Russia, SA = South Africa, SP = Spain, SW = Sweden, SZ = Switzerland, TU = Turkey, UK = United Kingdom, US = USA. dolan 2010 6 International Energy Outlook W 25 n, T n, oo 20 20 TW sumpti 15 y Con 10 gg Ener 5 0 1980 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 Year dolan 2010 7 World energy resources Power Limits, TW Renewable Energy Resources Current Ultimately Solar 13.5 1580 Biomass 1.74 8.56 Wind 0090.09 130 Wave and Tidal 0.05 1-10 Hydro 0.75 11 Geothermal 0.01 0.3 Organic Waste 0.02 0.1 dolan 2010 8 World energy resources ELiitEnergy Limits Recoverable Fossil Fuels Joule TW-years Coal and Lignite (9.09E11 ton) 2.4x1022 753 Crude Oil (1.34E12 barrels) 7.9x1021 249 Natural Gas (1.7E14 m^3) 6.6x1021 208 Tar-Sand Oil (3.
    [Show full text]