DOCSLIB.ORG

Physical Evolution Model for Jupiter-Family Comets and Centaurs

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Physical Evolution Model for Jupiter-Family Comets and Centaurs EPSC Abstracts Vol. 14, EPSC2020-515, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-515 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Physical Evolution Model for Jupiter-Family Comets and Centaurs Luke Dones1 and Maria Womack2 1Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, Colorado, USA ([email protected]) 2Florida Space Institute and Department of Physics, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA ([email protected]) Centaurs – planet-crossing bodies in the region of the giant planets that mainly originate in the Kuiper Belt/Scattered Disk [1, 2] – are thought to be the primary impactors on the giant planets and their satellites [3-8]. As part of an effort to interpret the cratering records of the saturnian satellites, we are developing a dynamical-physical model for the size distribution of potential impactors on the moons. Most models of the orbital distribution of "observable" comets[1] assume that the size of the nucleus does not change with time. These models treat physical evolution only by assuming a lifetime, after which comets are considered inactive or "faded". These models do not specify a fading mechanism, but assume an expression for the probability that a comet remains active after some amount of time [10-14]. Fading can result from loss of all volatiles, formation of a nonvolatile mantle on the surface of the nucleus, or splitting [15, 16]. A model of the erosion of 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko and 46P/Wirtanen due to sublimation of water ice throughout their orbital evolution estimates that 67P’s nucleus has shrunk from a radius of 2.5 km to 2 km, while 46P’s has decreased from 1 km to 0.6 km [17]. This calculation assumes that 10% of the nucleus is active and that its density is 500 kg/m3. These estimates are uncertain because comets follow chaotic orbits, but in general, erosion has a bigger effect on smaller nuclei. Some comets are active well beyond the water-ice sublimation zone within 3 au. Eighteen active Centaurs are currently known [18, 19]. 29P/Schwassmann-Wachmann, which follows a near-circular orbit at 6 au, is a copious source of dust and CO [20-22] and undergoes significant dust outbursts 7 or more times a year [23]. 174P/Echeclus underwent an outburst 13 au from the Sun that released ≈ 300 kg/s of dust for about two months [24], a rate comparable to the 530 kg/s of dust released by 67P at its peak near 1.3 au [25]. Echeclus also underwent several more outbursts near perihelion (≈6 au) with CO outgassing at ≈ 10% the rate of 29P at the same heliocentric distance and dust mass loss rates of 10 - 700 kg/s [20]. 2060 Chiron is another Centaur that is sporadically active in gas and dust, consistent with a more depleted state, like Echeclus [20]. Di Sisto et al. (2009) constructed a model of the orbital distributions of Jupiter-family comets (JFCs) that incorporated planetary perturbations, nongravitational forces, sublimation, and splitting. They considered nuclei with initial radii of 10, 5, and 1 km [26]. Di Sisto et al. found that 5- and 10-km comets usually evolved onto Centaur orbits, while 1-km comets were most likely to shrink below 100 m. Inspired by their work, we are developing a model for the dynamical-physical evolution of JFCs and Centaurs. We will use the orbital distribution found by Nesvorny et al. as our baseline model [14, 27]. We will first focus on modeling the evolution of the size distribution of JFCs. The model will eventually account for mass loss by both JFCs and Centaurs, with activity driven by H2O, CO, or other volatiles. The fraction of the nucleus that is active will be allowed to vary with size, since smaller nuclei are typically more active [28-30]. We will then implement a model for cometary splitting with these inputs: the frequency of splitting as a function of perihelion distance; the fraction of the comet’s mass released as fragments; the size distribution of the fragments; and the velocity imparted to the fragments by the splitting event. We will present preliminary results of our simulations. We thank Raphael Marschall for discussions and the Cassini Data Analysis Program for support. References [1] Volk, K.; Malhotra, R. ApJ 687, 714–725, 2008. [2] Di Sisto, R. P.; Rossignoli, N. L. CMDA, in press (arXiv:2006.09657), 2020. [3] Zahnle, K.; Dones, L.; Levison, H. F. Icarus 136, 202–222, 1998. [4] Zahnle, K.; Schenk, P.; Levison, H.; Dones, L. Icarus 163, 263–289, 2003. [5] Di Sisto, R. P.; Zanardi, M. A&A 553, id. A79, 2013. [6] Di Sisto, R. P.; Zanardi, M. Icarus 264, 90–101, 2016. [7] Rossignoli, N. L.; Di Sisto, R. P.; Zanardi, M.; Dugaro, A. A&A 627, id. A12, 2019. [8] Wong, E. W.; Brasser, R.; Werner, S. C. EPSL 506, 407–416, 2019. [9] Quinn, T.; Tremaine, S.; Duncan, M. ApJ 355, 667–679, 1990. [10] Oort, J. H. BAN 11, 91–110, 1950. [11] Levison, H. F.; Duncan, M. J. Icarus 127, 13–32, 1997. [12] Wiegert, P.; Tremaine, S. Icarus 137, 84–121, 1999. [13] Brasser, R.; Wang, J.-H. A&A 573, id. A102, 2015. [14] Nesvorný, D. et al. ApJ 845, id. 27, 2017. [15] Weissman, P. R.; Bottke, W. F., Jr.; Levison, H. F. In Asteroids III, Univ. Arizona Press, pp. 669–686, 2002. [16] Jewitt, D. C. In Comets II, Univ. Arizona Press, pp. 659–676, 2004. [17] Groussin, O. et al. MNRAS 376, 1399–1406, 2007. [18] Jewitt, D. AJ 137, 4296–4312, 2009. [19] Chandler, C. O. et al. ApJLett 892, id. L38, 2020. [20] Womack, M.; Sarid, G.; Wierzchos, K. PASP 129, 031001, 2017. [21] Sarid, G. et al. ApJLett 883, id. L25, 2019. [22] Wierzchos, K.; Womack, M. AJ 159, id. 136, 2020. [23] Trigo-Rodríguez, J. M. et al. MNRAS 409, 1682–1690, 2010. [24] Bauer, J. M. et al. PASP 120, 393–404, 2008. [25] Marschall, R. et al. Frontiers in Physics, doi: 10.3389/fphy.2020.00227 (arXiv:2005.13700), 2020. [26] Di Sisto, R. P.; Fernandez, J. A.; Brunini, A. Icarus 203, 140–154, 2009. [27] Nesvorný, D. et al. AJ 158, id. 132, 2019. [28] A’Hearn, M. F. et al. Science 332, 1396–1400, 2011. [29] Tancredi, G.; Fernandez, J. A.; Rickman, H.; Licandro, J. Icarus 182, 527–549, 2006. [30] Schleicher, D. G.; Knight, Matthew M. AJ 152, id. 89, 2016. [1] The simplest model used to compare simulated and observed orbital distributions assumes that comets that pass perihelion within a fixed distance from the Sun, such as 2.5 au, are "discovered" [9]. Powered by TCPDF (www.tcpdf.org).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KAREN J. MEECH February 7, 2019 Astronomer
    BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH – KAREN J. MEECH February 7, 2019 Astronomer Institute for Astronomy Tel: 1-808-956-6828 2680 Woodlawn Drive Fax: 1-808-956-4532 Honolulu, HI 96822-1839 [email protected] PROFESSIONAL PREPARATION Rice University Space Physics B.A. 1981 Massachusetts Institute of Tech. Planetary Astronomy Ph.D. 1987 APPOINTMENTS 2018 – present Graduate Chair 2000 – present Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1992-2000 Associate Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1987-1992 Assistant Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 1982-1987 Graduate Research & Teaching Assistant, Massachusetts Inst. Tech. 1981-1982 Research Specialist, AAVSO and Massachusetts Institute of Technology AWARDS 2018 ARCs Scientist of the Year 2015 University of Hawai’i Regent’s Medal for Research Excellence 2013 Director’s Research Excellence Award 2011 NASA Group Achievement Award for the EPOXI Project Team 2011 NASA Group Achievement Award for EPOXI & Stardust-NExT Missions 2009 William Tylor Olcott Distinguished Service Award of the American Association of Variable Star Observers 2006-8 National Academy of Science/Kavli Foundation Fellow 2005 NASA Group Achievement Award for the Stardust Flight Team 1996 Asteroid 4367 named Meech 1994 American Astronomical Society / DPS Harold C. Urey Prize 1988 Annie Jump Cannon Award 1981 Heaps Physics Prize RESEARCH FIELD AND ACTIVITIES • Developed a Discovery mission concept to explore the origin of Earth’s water. • Co-Investigator on the Deep Impact, Stardust-NeXT and EPOXI missions, leading the Earth-based observing campaigns for all three. • Leads the UH Astrobiology Research interdisciplinary program, overseeing ~30 postdocs and coordinating the research with ~20 local faculty and international partners.
    [Show full text]
  • Comet Section Observing Guide
    Comet Section Observing Guide 1 The British Astronomical Association Comet Section www.britastro.org/comet BAA Comet Section Observing Guide Front cover image: C/1995 O1 (Hale-Bopp) by Geoffrey Johnstone on 1997 April 10. Back cover image: C/2011 W3 (Lovejoy) by Lester Barnes on 2011 December 23. © The British Astronomical Association 2018 2018 December (rev 4) 2 CONTENTS 1 Foreword .................................................................................................................................. 6 2 An introduction to comets ......................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Anatomy and origins ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Naming .............................................................................................................................................. 12 2.3 Comet orbits ...................................................................................................................................... 13 2.4 Orbit evolution .................................................................................................................................... 15 2.5 Magnitudes ........................................................................................................................................ 18 3 Basic visual observation ........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Reconnaissance of the $\Beta $ Pictoris Gas Disk with The
    Draft version January 15, 2018 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX61 MOLECULAR RECONNAISSANCE OF THE β PICTORIS GAS DISK WITH THE SMA: A LOW HCN/(CO+CO2) OUTGASSING RATIO AND PREDICTIONS FOR FUTURE SURVEYS L. Matra`,1, ∗ D. J. Wilner,1 K. I. Oberg,¨ 1 S. M. Andrews,1 R. A. Loomis,1 M. C. Wyatt,2 and W. R. F. Dent3 1Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA 2Institute of Astronomy, University of Cambridge, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HA, UK 3ALMA Santiago Central Offices, Alonso de Cordova 3107, Vitacura, Santiago, Chile (Received 2017 September 13; Revised 2017 December 20; Accepted 2017 December 24) ABSTRACT The exocometary origin of CO gas has been confirmed in several extrasolar Kuiper belts, with CO ice abundances consistent with Solar System comets. We here present a molecular survey of the β Pictoris belt with the Submillimeter + + Array (SMA), reporting upper limits for CN, HCN, HCO ,N2H and H2CO, as well as for H2S, CH3OH, SiO and DCN from archival ALMA data. Non-detections can be attributed to rapid molecular photodissociation due to the A- star's strong UV flux. CN is the longest-lasting and most easily detectable molecule after CO in this environment. We update our NLTE excitation model to include UV fluorescence, finding it plays a key role in CO and CN excitation, and use it to turn the SMA CN/CO flux ratio constraint into an upper limit of < 2:5% on the HCN/(CO+CO2) ratio of outgassing rates. This value is consistent with, but at the low end of, the broad range observed in Solar System comets.
    [Show full text]
  • VITA David Jewitt Address Dept. Earth, Planetary and Space
    VITA David Jewitt Address Dept. Earth, Planetary and Space Sciences, UCLA 595 Charles Young Drive East, Box 951567 Los Angeles, CA 90095-1567 [email protected], http://www2.ess.ucla.edu/~jewitt/ Education B. Sc. University College London 1979 M. S. California Institute of Technology 1980 Ph. D. California Institute of Technology 1983 Professional Experience Summer Student Royal Greenwich Observatory 1978 Anthony Fellowship California Institute of Technology 1979-1980 Research Assistant California Institute of Technology 1980-1983 Assistant Professor Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1983-1988 Associate Professor and Astronomer University of Hawaii 1988-1993 Professor and Astronomer University of Hawaii 1993-2009 Professor Dept. Earth, Planetary & Space Sciences, UCLA 2009- Inst. of Geophys & Planetary Physics, UCLA 2009-2011 Dept. Physics & Astronomy, UCLA 2010- Director Institute for Planets & Exoplanets, UCLA, 2011- Honors Regent's Medal, University of Hawaii 1994 Scientist of the Year, ARCS 1996 Exceptional Scientific Achievement Award, NASA 1996 Fellow of University College London 1998 Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 2005 Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science 2005 Member of the National Academy of Sciences 2005 National Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Honorary Professor 2006-2011 National Central University, Taiwan, Adjunct Professor 2007 The Shaw Prize for Astronomy 2012 The Kavli Prize for Astrophysics 2012 Foreign Member, Norwegian Academy of Sciences & Letters 2012 Research
    [Show full text]
  • PHYSICAL MECHANISM of COMET (AND ASTEROID) OUTBURSTS: the MOVIE William K
    78th Annual Meeting of the Meteoritical Society (2015) 5002.pdf PHYSICAL MECHANISM OF COMET (AND ASTEROID) OUTBURSTS: THE MOVIE William K. Hartman, Planetary Science Institute, 1700 E. Ft. Lowell Road, Tucson, AZ 85719 The asteroid-comet continuum has been observationally demonstrated since spectrometric work in the early 1980s [1,2]. Here I describe a mechanism explaining sporadic comet (and “as- teroid”) outbursts, illustrated by experiments conducted in 1976 at the NASA Ames Research Center=s Vertical Gun Facility (VGF). I studied low velocity impacts into simulated regolith powders and gravels, in order to examine physics of low-velocity collisions during early solar system planetesimal formation. In one Aaccidental@ experiment, the bucket of powder remained gas- charged during evacuation of the VGF vacuum chamber. The impactor, moving at 5.5 m/s, disturbed the surface, initiating an explosive eruption of the dust-charged gas, shooting in jets from multiple vents near the impact site at speeds up to about 3 m/s, with sporadic venting until 17 seconds after the impact. This experiment was described in [3], which concluded that it simulated comet eruption phenomena. In this hypothesis, a com- et nucleus develops a lag deposit of regolith, and as the body reaches a certain distance from the sun, the thermal wave pene- trates to an ice-rich depth, causing sublimation. Gas rises into the regolith pore spaces, and creates a gas-charged powder, as in our experiment. Any disturbance of the surface, such as a mete- oroid, initiates a temporary jet. In the absence of such a disturb- ance, the gas pressure becomes sufficient to blow off the over- burden and initiate widespread eruptions, as seen in Giotto imag- es of P/Halley.
    [Show full text]
  • Photometric and Spectroscopic Observations of (2060) Chiron at the ESO Very Large Telescope
    A&A 400, 369–373 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20021890 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics Photometric and spectroscopic observations of (2060) Chiron at the ESO Very Large Telescope J. Romon-Martin1, C. Delahodde2,M.A.Barucci1,C.deBergh1, and N. Peixinho1,3 1 Observatoire de Paris, Meudon, France 2 Institut d’Astrophysique de Marseille, France 3 Centro de Astronomia e Astrofisica da Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal Received 7 June 2002 / Accepted 9 December 2002 Abstract. Photometric and spectroscopic observations of Centaur Chiron have been obtained at the ESO/Very Large Telescope (VLT), both in optical and near-infrared spectral ranges, on 12–14 June 2001. Photometric optical data reveal that Chiron had reached a high activity level at that time. No absorption feature could be seen on the spectra; especially, no water ice could be detected. Key words. comets: individual: Chiron – minor planets, asteroids – techniques: spectroscopic, photometric 1. Introduction Chiron has been determined by several authors, who obtained values close to 6 hrs. The variation in the amplitude of the Centaur (2060) Chiron was discovered in 1977 (Kowal et al. lightcurve, ranging from 0.04 to 0.09 magnitude, is related to 1977), and it was first classified as an asteroid. About ten years the cometary activity level (see e.g. Lazzaro et al. 1997). In later, Tholen et al. (1988) found non-asteroidal brightness vari- the following, we will use the rotational period determined by ations, and suggested that some kind of cometary activity may Marcialis & Buratti (1993): P = 5.917813 ± 0.000007 hrs. occur on Chiron.
    [Show full text]
  • Urania Nr 2/2018
    ISTNIEJE OD ROKU 1919, DRUKIEM WYDAWANA JEST OD ROKU 1922 DWUMIESIĘCZNIK 2/2018 (794) Tom LXXXIX Cena 14,90 zł w tym 5% VAT WWW.URANIA.EDU.PL kosmiczne PIERŚCIENIE KOSMOLOGIA nieliniowa BADANIE PLANETOID dla każdego ISSN 1689-6009 indeks 401323 TELESKOP ALMA Z BLISKA 2/2018 Urania 1 www.astronarium.pl Godziny emisji w TVP 3: youtube.com/AstronariumPL premiery: czwartki 17:00 i 20:30 facebook.com/AstronariumTVP powtórki: soboty 7:06 i 23:45 URANIA – NASZA MUZA Sto lat z URANIĄ dla szkół, uczelni oraz miłośników astronomii i amatorów nocnego nieba ielkimi krokami zbliża się setna rocznica założenia Polskiego Towarzystwa Miło- śników Astronomii. Czy jednak zdajemy sobie sprawę, kiedy należy obchodzić to wydarzenie? Przeanalizowałem prawie 23 tysiące stron archiwalnych numerów Uranii z lat W1920–1997, aby dowiedzieć się, co mówi nam ona o dacie założenia Polskiego Towarzystwa Miłośników Astronomii. Dlaczego raz podaje się rok 1919, a innym razem 1921 r.? Osobiście, prowadząc Sekcję Historyczną PTMA i zbierając materiały na temat historii Towarzystwa, cią- gle mam dylemat, czy zbliżające się „stulecie” Polskiego Towarzystwa Miłośników Astronomii powinniśmy obchodzić już za rok, czy dopiero za trzy lata? Tym bardziej że te wydarzenia są już planowane! Cały czas tkwią we mnie wątpliwości. Czy się trochę nie pospieszyliśmy? Czy planowane obchody stulecia w 2019 r. to dobre posunięcie? Po pierwsze, musimy wiedzieć, jak zrodził się pomysł założenia Koła i potem Towarzystwa. Wpadło na to dwóch uczniów ostatniej klasy Gimnazjum Kulwiecia w Warszawie Stefan Kaliński i Stanisław Mrozowski, którzy zafascynowali się kometą okresową Brorsena-Met- calfa. Zwrócili się oni do prof. F. Kępińskiego, prowadzącego wówczas lekcje kosmografii w paru gimnazjach, z propozycją utworzenia Towarzystwa Miłośników Astronomii.
    [Show full text]
  • The Presence of Clathrates in Comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Adrienn Luspay-Kuti, Olivier Mousis, Myrtha Hässig, Stephen A
    The presence of clathrates in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Adrienn Luspay-Kuti, Olivier Mousis, Myrtha Hässig, Stephen A. Fuselier, Jonathan I. Lunine, Bernard Marty, Kathleen E. Mandt, Peter Wurz, Martin Rubin To cite this version: Adrienn Luspay-Kuti, Olivier Mousis, Myrtha Hässig, Stephen A. Fuselier, Jonathan I. Lunine, et al.. The presence of clathrates in comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko. Science Advances , American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2016, 2 (4), 10.1126/sciadv.1501781. hal- 01440139 HAL Id: hal-01440139 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01440139 Submitted on 7 Jan 2021 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial| 4.0 International License RESEARCH ARTICLE SPACE SCIENCES 2016 © The Authors, some rights reserved; exclusive licensee American Association for the Advancement of Science. Distributed The presence of clathrates in comet under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial License 4.0 (CC BY-NC). 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko 10.1126/sciadv.1501781 Adrienn Luspay-Kuti,1* Olivier Mousis,2 Myrtha Hässig,1,3 Stephen A. Fuselier,1,4 Jonathan I. Lunine,5 Bernard Marty,6 Kathleen E. Mandt,1,4 Peter Wurz,3,7 Martin Rubin3 Cometary nuclei are considered to most closely reflect the composition of the building blocks of our solar system.
    [Show full text]
  • Dust Phenomena Relating to Airless Bodies
    Space Sci Rev (2018) 214:98 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-018-0527-0 Dust Phenomena Relating to Airless Bodies J.R. Szalay1 · A.R. Poppe2 · J. Agarwal3 · D. Britt4 · I. Belskaya5 · M. Horányi6 · T. Nakamura7 · M. Sachse8 · F. Spahn 8 Received: 8 August 2017 / Accepted: 10 July 2018 © Springer Nature B.V. 2018 Abstract Airless bodies are directly exposed to ambient plasma and meteoroid fluxes, mak- ing them characteristically different from bodies whose dense atmospheres protect their surfaces from such fluxes. Direct exposure to plasma and meteoroids has important con- sequences for the formation and evolution of planetary surfaces, including altering chemical makeup and optical properties, generating neutral gas and/or dust exospheres, and leading to the generation of circumplanetary and interplanetary dust grain populations. In the past two decades, there have been many advancements in our understanding of airless bodies and their interaction with various dust populations. In this paper, we describe relevant dust phenomena on the surface and in the vicinity of airless bodies over a broad range of scale sizes from ∼ 10−3 km to ∼ 103 km, with a focus on recent developments in this field. Keywords Dust · Airless bodies · Interplanetary dust Cosmic Dust from the Laboratory to the Stars Edited by Rafael Rodrigo, Jürgen Blum, Hsiang-Wen Hsu, Detlef Koschny, Anny-Chantal Levasseur-Regourd, Jesús Martín-Pintado, Veerle Sterken and Andrew Westphal B J.R. Szalay [email protected] A.R. Poppe [email protected] 1 Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08540, USA 2 Space Sciences Laboratory, U.C. Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA 3 Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research, Göttingen, Germany 4 University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL 32816, USA 5 Institute of Astronomy, V.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Orbit Determination of Trans-Neptunian Objects and Centaurs for the Prediction of Stellar Occultations?,??
    A&A 584, A96 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526498 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics Orbit determination of trans-Neptunian objects and Centaurs for the prediction of stellar occultations?;?? J. Desmars1;2, J. I. B. Camargo1;3, F. Braga-Ribas1;3;4, R. Vieira-Martins1;3;???, M. Assafin5, F. Vachier2, F. Colas2, J. L. Ortiz6, R. Duffard6, N. Morales6, B. Sicardy7, A. R. Gomes-Júnior5, and G. Benedetti-Rossi1 1 Observatório Nacional/MCTI, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, CEP 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 2 Institut de Mécanique Céleste et de Calcul des Éphémérides – Observatoire de Paris, UMR 8028 CNRS, 77 avenue Denfert-Rochereau, 75014 Paris, France e-mail: [email protected] 3 Laboratório Interinstitucional de e-Astronomia – LIneA, Rua Gal. José Cristino 77, CEP 20921-400, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 4 Federal University of Technology – Paraná (UTFPR / DAFIS), Rua Sete de Setembro, 3165, CEP 80230-901, Curitiba, PR, Brazil 5 Observatório do Valongo/UFRJ, Ladeira do Pedro Antônio 43, CEP 20080-090, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil 6 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Apartado 3004, 18080 Granada, Spain 7 LESIA, Observatoire de Paris, CNRS UMR 8109, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Université Paris-Diderot, 5 place Jules Janssen, 92195 Meudon Cedex, France Received 8 May 2015 / Accepted 7 September 2015 ABSTRACT Context. The prediction of stellar occultations by trans-Neptunian objects (TNOs) and Centaurs is a difficult challenge that requires accuracy both in the occulted star position and in the object ephemeris. Until now, the most used method of prediction, involving dozens of TNOs/Centaurs, has been to consider a constant offset for the right ascension and for the declination with respect to a reference ephemeris, usually the latest public version.
    [Show full text]
  • Astronomical Studies of Solar System Bodies 2060 Chiron and 1 Ceres
    Astronomical Studies of Solar System Bodies 2060 Chiron and 1 Ceres by Jessica Dawn Ruprecht Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of ARCHVES Master of Science in Earth and Planetary Sciences ~NSTTUTE at the J* iI MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY June 2013 @ Massachusetts Institute of Technology 2013. All rights reserved. A uthor ................. ...... .. .. .... .. Department of rth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences May 22, 2013 C ertified by .................. .. Richard P. Binzel Professor of Planetary Sciences Thesis Supervisor ~1 A, d~ Accepted by ... ..... ... ... .. .. .......... .. ... Robert van der Hilst Schlumberger Professor of Earth and Planetary Sciences Head of Dept. of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences 2 Astronomical Studies of Solar System Bodies 2060 Chiron and 1 Ceres by Jessica Dawn Ruprecht Submitted to the Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences on May 17, 2013, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences Abstract In this thesis two separate projects are investigated, a stellar occultation by 2060 Chiron and rotationally resolved spectra of 1 Ceres. On 29 November 2011 UT, 2060 Chiron occulted a 14-mag star; data were suc- cessfully obtained at the 3-m IRTF on Mauna Kea and 2-m Faulkes North Telescope at Haleakala. The IRTF lightcurve shows a solid-body detection of Chiron's nucleus with a chord lasting 16.0t1.4 seconds, corresponding to a chord length of 158t14 km. Symmetric, dual extinction features in the Faulkes light curve indicate the presence of optically thick material roughly 300 km from the body midpoint.
    [Show full text]
  • Target Names
    Target Names Introduction Here you will find PDS rules for designated solar system objects. While some objects are clear in their designations, some objects are more ambiguous. Many minor planets have multiple designations, and it is common for new names to be added or existing names changed or modified sometimes long after they were initially assigned. There are also numerous name collisions between small bodies of various types - there are comets that share names with asteroids, asteroids with the same name as meteorites, and planetary moons with the same names as asteroids. So when identifying observational targets in your PDS data products, it is vitally important that the target be uniquely identified by the <name> in its <Target_Identification> class. Complicating this is the requirement to provide one or more <type> indications for each target, where the values must be selected from a list of predetermined standard values that is not as applicable to the range of small body targets as we might hope (see noted below). Appropriate and suggested <type> values are included in the descriptions below, but if you have a target that seems to have an unlisted type, please contact your PDS node consultant with details as soon as possible. Unambiguous Identification The make sure a natural target object (like an asteroid or satellite) is uniquely identified, you should formulate the <name> value so that the following is true: 1. The name string contains at least one identifier that can only be associated with a single physical object. 2. The name string contains at least two different identifiers for each object wherever possible.
    [Show full text]