Charles T. Bryson Daniel A. Skojac, Jr.1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Charles T. Bryson Daniel A. Skojac, Jr.1 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE VASCULAR FLORA OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI 1 Charles T. Bryson Daniel A. Skojac, Jr. USDA, ARS USDA, FS, Southern Region Crop Production Systems Research Unit Chattahoochee NF Stoneville, Mississippi 38776, U.S.A. 3941 Highway 76 Chatsworth, Georgia 30705, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Field explorations have yielded 271 species new to Washington County, Mississippi and Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz & Pav.) DC. and Ruellia nudiflora (Engelm. & .A. Gray) Urban new to the state. An annotated list of 809 taxa for Washington County is provided and excludes 59 species that were reported from counties adjacent and included in the 1980 Washington County and environs flora, but have yet to be docu- mented from Washington County. RESUMEN Exploraciones de campo han dado como resultado 271 especies nuevas para Washington County, Mississippi y Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz & Pav.) DC. y Ruellia nudiflora (Engelm. & .A. Gray) Urban nuevas para el estado. Se aporta una lista anotada de 809 taxa para Washington County y se excluyen 59 especies que estaban citadas de condados adyacentes e incluidas en la flora de 1980 de Washington County y alre- dedores, pero que no se han documentado aún para Washington County. INTRODUCTION The flora of Mississippi, especially the Yazoo-Mississippi River Alluvial Plain, is poorly reported (Bryson & Carter 1994; Skojac et al. 2007) compared to other physiographic regions of Mississippi and of adjacent states. Lowe’s Plants of Mississippi (1921) still remains the only effort at a comprehensive flora of the state. Several county floras have been compiled, mostly by graduate students at various universities; however, comprehen- sive floras are lacking for more than 80% of Mississippi’s 82 counties. Gunn et al. (1980) prepared a Flora of Washington County and Environs. This work has been the standard for plant identification by researchers, consultants, educators, farmers, and the general public for the past quarter century. Gunn et al. (1980) listed 669 taxa for Washington County and environs; however, 131 species were collected in the adjacent counties of Bolivar, Humphreys, Issaquena, Sharkey, and Sunflower. Because supplies of Gunn et al. (1980) were depleted almost a decade ago and collection efforts have yielded additional species to the county, our objective is to provide an updated list of the species found only within the confines of Washington County, Mississippi. Washington County is in the Mississippi-Yazoo alluvial plain of the physiographic or land use area known as the Delta Region (Lowe 1921). The county is bordered by the Mississippi River on the west and lies about half way between Memphis, TN and Vicksburg, MS (Lowe 1921; Skojac et al. 2007). The county is about 20,000 ha and the elevation ranges from 27.5 to 43 m above sea level. Thus, the topography of the region is relatively flat except along the natural and man-made levees of creeks, streams, oxbow lakes, and the Mississippi River. Little of the county remains undisturbed. Most of the land was cleared for row crop production, espe- cially the well-drained areas, and many areas have been under cultivation since the mid 19th century. Soils of Washington County are deep and fertile and of alluvial origin, and range from poorly drained fine clays to well drained silt loams and sands (Morris 1961). The five main soil associations found in Washington County are nearly level and range from poorly, moderately, and excessively drained. These soil associations occur in areas that are classified as alluvial, slack-water, low terraces, old natural levees and recent natural le- vees. Over one third of the soils in the county are highly productive sandy loams (e.g., Dundee & Bosket soils) 1Formerly at USDA, FS, Southern Research Station, Center for Bottomland Hardwoods Research, Stoneville, MS 38776. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 5(2): 855 – 866. 2011 856 Journal of the Botanical Research Institute of Texas 5(2) and have been historically used for cotton production. Recently, the crop diversity on these soils includes corn, cotton, and soybean, while silt and clay soils are primarily utilized for rice and soybean production, farm raised catfish ponds, or scattered remnant forests. The native mixed deciduous bottomland forest is a product of edaphic rather than climatic conditions (Gunn 1980). The climate of Washington County is considered temperate with average temperatures ranging from 8°C in January to 24°C in July. The summers are hot and humid with daytime temperatures occasionally over 38°C. During short cold periods in the winter, temperatures are rarely below -10°C. The average growing season is about 200 days with an average killing frost on November 2 and the last hard freeze usually occurs in early to mid March. Vouchers for the additions to the Washington County flora are deposited in herbaria at the USDA-ARS Jamie Whitten Delta States Research Center (SWSL) and the USDA Southern Hardwoods Research Laboratory (CBHRL) both at Stoneville, MS as indicated in Table 1. Duplicates of many of these collections were distrib- uted to other herbaria within Mississippi (DSC, IBE, MISS, MISSA, MMNS, or USMS) and elsewhere depend- ing on the number of duplicates. Collector, collection number, and herbarium or a publication that reported additional species to Washington County are cited following each species added since Gunn et al. (1980). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION As a result of fieldwork during the past three decades, 271 species have been added to the flora of Washington County, Mississippi. Calandrinia ciliata (Ruiz & Pav.) DC. and Ruellia nudiflora (Engelm. & A. Gray) Urban, both new to the state, are reported in the annotated flora of Washington County (Table 1). Since Gunn et al. (1980), 72 species listed from adjacent counties were collected within the county; 59 species have not been detected yet in Washington County and are listed in Table 2. A few species were misidentified (e.g., the vouch- er for Sida elliottii Torr. & A. Gray was an abberant specimen of S. rhombifolia L.), and thus not included in the annotated list for Washington County (Table 1) but retained in those species yet to be collected within the county (Table 2). Nomenclature changes since Gunn et al. (1980) were updated to follow published volumes of Flora of North America, e.g., Urochloa ramosa (L.) R.D. Webster for Brachiaria ramosa (L.) Stapf. Other taxa were redetermined or aligned with currently accepted nomenclature or where species concepts have changed, such as Carex aureolensis Steud. rather than C. frankii Kunth, now defined as taxa with a distribution well north of the Delta Region. Alignment of families not yet treated yet in Flora of North America follow Missouri Botanical Garden’s Tropicos (Tropicos 2011). Author abbreviations follow The International Plant Names Index (IPNI 2011). With these additions and realignments as mentioned above, 809 taxa are now known within the bounds of Washington County. Of the 117 Family cited as occuring in Washington County and environs by Gunn et al. (1980), one fam- ily, one family, Asclepiadaceae, was lumped into Apocynaceae (Table 1), and Melastomataceae, was excluded because no species within the family were found within the confines of Washington County (Table 2). Eleven families were added to the flora of Washington County and include Annonaceae, Berberidaceae, Dioscoreaceae, Cannabaceae, Fumariaceae, Haloragaceae, Hippocastanaceae, Lygodiaceae, Simaroubaceae, Sterculiaceae, and Thelypteridaceae (Table 1). Fumariaceae was included in Gunn et al. (based on a collection of Corydalis flavula (Raf.) DC. from an adjacent county and was included based on a recent collection. Other family names provided by Gunn et al. (1980) were changed to conform to new classification schemes, e.g., Dryopteridaceae for Asplidiaceae; Amaryllidaceae folded into Liliaceae; and Smilaceae segregated from Liliaceae. Ultimately, 122 plant families are listed for Washington County (Table 1). Additional field research should add native taxa to this list. Also, species not native to the Delta Region will undoubtedly be added because of human activities and the vast areas under cultivation. Bryson and Skojac, Flora of Washington Co., Mississippi 857 TABLE 1. Annotated list of the species collected within Washington County, Mississippi cited in Gunn et al. (1980) or confirmed as noted by literature citation or as new data (collector, collection number, and herbaria where vouchers are deposited). PTERIDOFITAS Bromeliaceae Tillandsia usneoides L. Aspleniaceae Asplenium platyneuron (L.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb. Cannaceae Canna X generalis L. H. Bailey Azollaceae Azolla caroliniana Willd. Commelinaceae Commelina communis L. Dryopteridaceae Commelina diffusa Burm. f. Athyrium filix-femina (L.) Roth. var. asplenioides (Michx.) Hulten Commelina virginica L. Onoclea sensibilis L. Murdannia nudiflora (L.) Brenan (Bryson 23762) Equisetaceae Tradescantia ohiensis Raf. Equisetum hyemale L. Tradescantia virginiana L. Lygodiaceae Cyperaceae Lygodium japonicum (Thunb.) Sw. (Bryson 16767, SWSL) Carex abscondita Mack. (Carter et al. 1990) Carex albicans Willd. ex Spreng. (Carter et al. 1990, cited as C. phy- Marsileaceae sorhyncha Liebm. ex Steud.) Marsilea vestita Hook. & Grev. Carex annectens E.P. Bicknell Ophioglossaceae Carex blanda Dewey Botrychium virginianum (L.) Sw. (Skojac 454, CBHRL) Carex bromoides Schkuhr subsp. bromoides (Carter et al. 1990) Ophioglossum vulgatum L var. pycnostichum (Fernald) Love & Love Carex bulbostylis Mack. (Bryson 11522, SWSL)
Recommended publications
  • A Phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae Including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae)
    Peterson, P.M., K. Romaschenko, and Y. Herrera Arrieta. 2020. A phylogeny of the Hubbardochloinae including Tetrachaete (Poaceae: Chloridoideae: Cynodonteae). Phytoneuron 2020-81: 1–13. Published 18 November 2020. ISSN 2153 733 A PHYLOGENY OF THE HUBBARDOCHLOINAE INCLUDING TETRACHAETE (CYNODONTEAE: CHLORIDOIDEAE: POACEAE) PAUL M. PETERSON AND KONSTANTIN ROMASCHENKO Department of Botany National Museum of Natural History Smithsonian Institution Washington, D.C. 20013-7012 [email protected]; [email protected] YOLANDA HERRERA ARRIETA Instituto Politécnico Nacional CIIDIR Unidad Durango-COFAA Durango, C.P. 34220, México [email protected] ABSTRACT The phylogeny of subtribe Hubbardochloinae is revisited, here with the inclusion of the monotypic genus Tetrachaete, based on a molecular DNA analysis using ndhA intron, rpl32-trnL, rps16 intron, rps16- trnK, and ITS markers. Tetrachaete elionuroides is aligned within the Hubbardochloinae and is sister to Dignathia. The biogeography of the Hubbardochloinae is discussed, its origin likely in Africa or temperate Asia. In a previous molecular DNA phylogeny (Peterson et al. 2016), the subtribe Hubbardochloinae Auquier [Bewsia Gooss., Dignathia Stapf, Gymnopogon P. Beauv., Hubbardochloa Auquier, Leptocarydion Hochst. ex Stapf, Leptothrium Kunth, and Lophacme Stapf] was found in a clade with moderate support (BS = 75, PP = 1.00) sister to the Farragininae P.M. Peterson et al. In the present study, Tetrachaete elionuroides Chiov. is included in a phylogenetic analysis (using ndhA intron, rpl32- trnL, rps16 intron, rps16-trnK, and ITS DNA markers) in order to test its relationships within the Cynodonteae with heavy sampling of species in the supersubtribe Gouiniodinae P.M. Peterson & Romasch. Chiovenda (1903) described Tetrachaete Chiov. with a with single species, T.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Monitoring Report
    Baseline Monitoring Report First Baptist Church of West Palm Beach ACOE Permit: SAJ-2019-01762 SFWMD Permit: 50-102946-P SFWMD Application Number: 200117-2648 West Palm Beach, Florida Prepared For: South Florida Water Management District and US Army Corps of Engineers Prepared By: Jim Goldasich, SPWS 11/25/2020 J. J. Goldasich and Associates, Incorporated Boca Raton, Florida This report provides the Baseline conditions for the wetland mitigation area for this project. Baseline Wetland Monitoring Report November 25, 2020 ACOE: SAJ-2019-01762 SFWMD: 50-102946-P West Palm Beach, Florida JGA File 19 - 1454 Page 2 of 9 Contents Introduction: ........................................................................................................................................... 3 Vegetation: ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Site Photo #1: Existing wetland vegetation, false buttonweed (Spermacoce glabra). ...................... 3 Site Photo #2: Current site conditions at the proposed wetland mitigation area. ............................. 4 Site Photo #3: Current pond conditions. .......................................................................................... 4 Figure 1: Site Aerial ............................................................................................................................ 5 Figure 2: Current Site Conditions Map...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • County Inventory Mockup
    A Survey of Natural Area Sites in Cherokee County, Kansas Open-File Report No. 125 December 31, 2005 Hillary Loring, Kelly Kindscher, and Jennifer Delisle Kansas Natural Heritage Inventory Kansas Biological Survey 2101 Constant Avenue Lawrence, KS 66047 A Survey of Natural Area Sites in Cherokee County, Kansas Cover Photo: Native Low Prairie in Cherokee County, 2005. Photo Hillary Loring. This Low Prairie is protected under the Wetlands Reserve Program of the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Report submitted December 31, 2005. Citation: Loring, H., K. Kindscher, and J. Delisle. A Survey of Natural Area Sites in Cherokee County, Kansas. Open-File Report No. 125. Kansas Biological Survey. Lawrence, KS. iii+33 pp. Abstract During the summer and fall of 2005, the Kansas Biological Survey surveyed 29 high- quality natural areas in Cherokee County. The high-quality prairie communities that were surveyed during this study were Unglaciated Tallgrass Prairie, Low Prairie, and Hardpan Prairie. The high-quality forests surveyed in this study are classified as Ozark Upland Forest. Based on the site surveys, we determined species richness values and floristic quality index (FQI) scores for each parcel. Species richness varied from 133 to 35. FQI scores ranged from a high of 43.6 to 19.5 for the lowest. State ranked rare plant species were identified at 28 of the 29 sites for a total of 118 new state records. We suggest several management recommendations for landowners as well as opportunities for both landowners and planning commissions to conserve some of these biologically rich tracts of land. A ranking of preservation priorities is provided along with a map showing the locations of the high-quality prairies and forests in Cherokee County.
    [Show full text]
  • In Our Coastal Gardens
    Detailed lists are available by pole beans, arugula, butter beans, Sept. MAY a slow-release nitrogen fertilizer. month at: https://txmg.org/aran- and herbs thru March. Transplant v Wildflowers/Annuals – do not Water with a very slow dripping sas/publications-other-resourc- warm season plants - tomato, mow wildflowers. Let them v Upkeep – check mulch levels, hose 1x/wk several hours - pepper, and eggplant. Protect replenish to 3-4” deep to deter dependent on how hot, dry, or es/news-column-archives/ bloom and go to seed so they warm weather crops from cold. come back next year. weeds, protect from heat, and windy. JANUARY v Fruit Trees – transplant new hold moisture. Keep mulch v Roses – Fertilize 1x/mo through varieties. Prune existing trees APRIL 2-3” away from trunk or stem. Sept. then water deeply. v Upkeep – cold spell predicted? = before they bloom and set fruit. Watch for spider mites, aphids, Deadheading after first spring water. Freeze? = cover plants until v Upkeep – fertilize all plants Remember, the branches you scale, beetles, whiteflies, and blossoms encourages blooming. temp is above freezing. Do not with compost, worm castings, trim won’t give you any fruit this powdery mildew. Check tender Watch for black spot, remove and fertilize until you see new growth or slow release fertilizer 1x/mo year, so don’t go crazy. growth. Many insects can be - and then, only lightly. Remove through summer, and mulch. Pull destroy diseased leaves. Prune washed off with a strong spray of problem and invasive species. v Roses – plant - well-drained weeds. Check for mildew, rust, climbing roses when they finish soil w/ 8 hrs of sun; fertilize.
    [Show full text]
  • Scanned Document
    ~ l ....... , .,. ... , •• 1 • • .. ,~ . · · . , ' .~ . .. , ...,.,, . ' . __.... ~ •"' --,~ ·- ., ......... J"'· ·····.-, ... .,,,.."" ............ ,... ....... .... ... ,,··~·· ....... v • ..., . .......... ,.. •• • ..... .. .. ... -· . ..... ..... ..... ·- ·- .......... .....JkJ(o..... .. I I ..... D · . ··.·: \I••• . r .• ! .. THE SPECIES IRIS STUDY GROUP OF THE AMERICAN IRIS SOCIETY \' -... -S:IGNA SPECIES IRIS GROUP OF NORTH AMERICA APRIL , 1986 NO. 36 OFFICERS CHAIRMAN: Elaine Hulbert Route 3, Box 57 Floyd VA 24091 VICE--CHAI.RMAN: Lee Welsr, 7979 W. D Ave. ~<alamazoo MI 4900/i SECRETARY: Florence Stout 150 N. Main St. Lombard, IL 6014~ TREASURER: Gene Opton 12 Stratford Rd. Berkelew CA 9470~ SEED EXCHANGE: Merry&· Dave Haveman PO Box 2054 Burling~rne CA 94011 -RO:E,IN DIRECTOR: Dot HuJsak 3227 So. Fulton Ave. Tulsc1, OK 74135 SLIDE DIRECTO~: Colin Rigby 2087 Curtis Dr . Penngrove CA 9495~ PUBLICATIONS SALES: Alan McMu~tr1e 22 Calderon Crescent Willowdale, Ontario, Canada M2R 2E5 SIGNA EDITOR : .Joan Cooper 212 W. Count~ Rd. C Roseville MN 55113 SIGNA PUBLISl-!ER:. Bruce Richardson 7 249 Twenty Road, RR 2 Hannon, Ontario, Canada L0R !Pe CONTENTS--APRIL, 1986--NO. 36 CHAIRMAN'S MESSAGE Elaine HL\l ber t 1261 PUBLICATI~NS AVAILABLE Al an McMwn tr ie 12c)1 SEED EXCHANGE REPORT David & Merry Haveman 1262 HONORARY LIFE MEMBERSHIPS El a ine? HLtlbert 1263 INDEX REPORTS Eric Tankesley-Clarke !263 SPECIES REGISTRATIONS--1985 Jean Witt 124-4' - SLIDE COLLECTION REPORT Col in Rigby 1264 TREASURER'S REPORT Gene (>pton 1264, NOMINATING COMMITTEE REPORT Sharon McAllister 1295 IRIS SOURCES UPDATE Alan McMurtrie 1266 QUESTIONS PLEASE '-Toan Cooper 1266 NEW TAXA OF l,P,IS L . FROM CHINA Zhao Yu·-· tang 1.26? ERRATA & ADDENDA ,Jim Rhodes 1269 IRIS BRAI\ICHil\iG IN TWO MOl~E SPECIES Jean Witt 1270 TRIS SPECIES FOR SHALLOW WATER Eberhard Schuster 1271 JAPANESE WILD IRISES Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Cynodonteae Tribe
    POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – GRASS FAMILY Plant: annuals or perennials Stem: jointed stem is termed a culm – internodial stem most often hollow but always solid at node, mostly round, some with stolons (creeping stem) or rhizomes (underground stem) Root: usually fibrous, often very abundant and dense Leaves: mostly linear, sessile, parallel veins, in 2 ranks (vertical rows), leaf sheath usually open or split and often overlapping, but may be closed Flowers: small in 2 rows forming a spikelet (1 to several flowers), may be 1 to many spikelets with pedicels or sessile to stem; each flower within a spikelet is between an outer limna (bract, with a midrib) and an inner palea (bract, 2-nerved or keeled usually) – these 3 parts together make the floret – the 2 bottom bracts of the spikelet do not have flowers and are termed glumes (may be reduced or absent), the rachilla is the axis that hold the florets; sepals and petals absent; 1-6 but often 3 stamens; 1 pistil, 1-3 but usually 2 styles, ovary superior, 1 ovule – there are exceptions to most everything!! Fruit: seed-like grain (seed usually fused to the pericarp (ovary wall) or not) Other: very large and important family; Monocotyledons Group Genera: 600+ genera; locally many genera 2 slides per species WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive POACEAE [GRAMINEAE] – CYNODONTEAE TRIBE Sideoats Grama; Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.) Torr. var. curtipendula - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Bermuda Grass; Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. (Introduced) - Cynodonteae (Tribe) Egyptian Grass [Durban Crowfoot]; Dactyloctenium aegyptium (L.) Willd (Introduced) [Indian] Goose Grass; Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTANY SECTION Compiled by Richard E. Weaver, Jr., Ph.D., and Patti J
    TRI-OLOGY, Vol. 47, No. 5 Patti J. Anderson, Ph.D., Managing Editor SEPTEMBER-OCTOBER 2008 DACS-P-00124 Wayne N. Dixon, Ph. D., Editor Page 1 of 13 BOTANY SECTION Compiled by Richard E. Weaver, Jr., Ph.D., and Patti J. Anderson, Ph.D. For this period, 167 specimens were submitted to the Botany Section for identification, and 1,418 were received from other sections for identification/name verification for a total of 1,585. In addition, 57 specimens were added to the herbarium, and 48 specimens of invasive species were prepared for the Division of Forestry’s Forest Health Project. Some of the samples received for identification are discussed below: Helianthus simulans E. E. Wats. (an endemic North American genus of 49 species, occurring throughout the United States and adjacent Canada, as well as in Baja California). Compositae (Asteraceae). Muck sunflower. It is unfortunate that such an attractive plant has such an unattractive common name. Growing to more than 2 m tall, this sunflower makes a showy and impressive specimen in the garden. In its best forms, the lanceolate leaves are leathery and dark green, somewhat reminiscent of those of the oleander (Nerium oleander). The flower heads, with bright yellow rays and usually a reddish- purple disk, are borne in profusion in October and November and vary from 7-10 cm across. Although it grows at least twice as tall and the leaves are broader and not revolute (turned under along the margins), it is often confused with the very common Helianthus simulans Photograph courtesy of Sally Wasowski and swamp sunflower (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Assessment of Argyreia Nervosa
    Risk assessment of Argyreia nervosa RIVM letter report 2019-0210 W. Chen | L. de Wit-Bos Risk assessment of Argyreia nervosa RIVM letter report 2019-0210 W. Chen | L. de Wit-Bos RIVM letter report 2019-0210 Colophon © RIVM 2020 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to the: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, and the title and year of publication are cited. DOI 10.21945/RIVM-2019-0210 W. Chen (author), RIVM L. de Wit-Bos (author), RIVM Contact: Lianne de Wit Department of Food Safety (VVH) [email protected] This investigation was performed by order of NVWA, within the framework of 9.4.46 Published by: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, RIVM P.O. Box1 | 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands www.rivm.nl/en Page 2 of 42 RIVM letter report 2019-0210 Synopsis Risk assessment of Argyreia nervosa In the Netherlands, seeds from the plant Hawaiian Baby Woodrose (Argyreia nervosa) are being sold as a so-called ‘legal high’ in smart shops and by internet retailers. The use of these seeds is unsafe. They can cause hallucinogenic effects, nausea, vomiting, elevated heart rate, elevated blood pressure, (severe) fatigue and lethargy. These health effects can occur even when the seeds are consumed at the recommended dose. This is the conclusion of a risk assessment performed by RIVM. Hawaiian Baby Woodrose seeds are sold as raw seeds or in capsules. The raw seeds can be eaten as such, or after being crushed and dissolved in liquid (generally hot water).
    [Show full text]
  • Oklahoma Natural Heritage Inventory Plant Tracking List
    OKLAHOMA NATURAL HERITAGE INVENTORY PLANT TRACKING LIST FAMILY UPDATED NAME COMMON NAME SRANK GRANK Acanthaceae Dyschoriste linearis (Torr. & A. Gray) Kuntze var. linearis polkadots S1T1 G4G5TNR Aizoaceae Sesuvium verrucosum Raf. winged sea purslane S1 G5 Alismataceae Alisma triviale Pursh northern water plantain S2 G5 Echinodorus tenellus (Mart.) Buchenau dwarf burhead SH G5? Sagittaria ambigua J.G. Sm. Kansas arrowhead S2 G2? Sagittaria cuneata E. Sheld. Wapatum arrowhead S2 G5 Amaranthaceae Amaranthus scleropoides Uline & W.L. Bray bone-bract pigweed SH G5 Chenopodium pallescens Standl. narrow-leaved goosefoot S1 G5 Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. aggregata Uline & W.L. Bray Guilleminea densa (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Schult.) Moq. cottonflower SNRTNR G5TNR var. densa Krascheninnikovia lanata (Pursh) A. Meeuse & A. Smit winterfat S1 G5 Suckleya suckleyana (Torr.) Rydb. poison suckleya S1 G5 Amaryllidaceae Hymenocallis liriosme (Raf.) Shinners Texas spiderlily S2 G4? Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. northern spiderlily S1T1 GNRTNR eulae (Shinners) G. Lom. Sm. & Flory Hymenocallis occidentalis (J. Le Conte) Kunth var. S1T1 GNRTNR occidentalis northern spiderlily Anacardiaceae Cotinus obovatus Raf. American smoketree S2 G4 Rhus copallinum L. var. lanceolata A. Gray prairie sumac SNAT1 G5T4T5 Rhus microphylla Engelm. ex A. Gray little-leaved sumac S1 G4G5 Apiaceae Berula erecta (Huds.) Coville wild parsnip S2 G4G5 Bowlesia incana Ruiz & Pav. hoary bowlesia SH G5 Erigenia bulbosa (Michx.) Nutt. harbinger-of-spring S1 G5 Eryngium diffusum Torr. spreading eryngo SH G4? Eryngium hookeri Walp. Hooker's eryngo S1 G3G5 Eryngium integrifolium Walter blue-flower coyotethistle S1 G5 Perideridia americana (Nutt. ex DC.) Rchb. eastern eulophus S1 G4 Ptilimnium costatum Raf.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochemical, Antimicrobial and Antioxidant Activities of Methanol Extract of Leaves and Flowers of Ipomoea Cairica
    AAAcccaaadddeeemmmiiiccc SSSccciiieeennnccceeesss International Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences ISSN- 0975-1491 Vol 5, Issue 1, 2013 Research Article PHYTOCHEMICAL, ANTIMICROBIAL AND ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITIES OF METHANOL EXTRACT OF LEAVES AND FLOWERS OF IPOMOEA CAIRICA SHEFALI ARORA 1, DEEPAK KUMAR 2 AND SHIBA 2 1Departmant of Chemistry, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun (UK) India, 2Deapartment of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Dolphin (PG) Institute of Biomedical and Natural Sciences, Dehradun (UK) India. Email: [email protected], [email protected] Received: 16 Oct 2012, Revised and Accepted: 29 Nov 2012 ABSTRACT Phytochemical, antimicrobial, and antioxidant investigation on the leaves and flower of Ipomoea cairica was traced in present investigation. Leaves and flowers of the plants were extracted with Methanol. Methanol Extracts of both leaves and flower of Ipomoea cairica were tested quantitatively for phytoconsituents. Methanol extract for both leaves and flower showed the presence of phytoconstituent Alkaloids, carbohydrates, tannins, phenolic compounds, proteins and amino acid, terpinoids and sterols and saponins. These extracts were further tested for their antimicrobial activity against the bacterial strains of Eschirechia coli (22 mm & 11 mm) , Klebsella pneumonia (11 mm & 10 mm) , Salmonella typhi (13 mm & 11 mm) , Bacillus subtilus (10 mm & 15 mm) , Staphylococcus aurius (08 mm & 13 mm) and the fungal strains of Aspergillus niger (16 mm & 14 mm) , Penicillum chrysogenum (20 mm & 18 mm) , Sacchomyces cerevisiae (25 mm & 21 mm) , Candida albicans (24 mm & 18 mm) of both methanol extract of leaves and flowers respectively . The results have shown that methanol extract of the leaves and flower of Ipomoea cairica showed very good activity against all the bacterial and fungus strains in comparison with chloramphenicol and ketoconazole.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference
    Stephen F. Austin State University SFA ScholarWorks Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference SFA Gardens 2008 4th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference David Creech Dept of Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Greg Grant Stephen F. Austin State University James Kroll Arthur Temple College of Forestry and Agriculture, Stephen F. Austin State University, [email protected] Dawn Stover Stephen F. Austin State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar Part of the Agricultural Education Commons, Botany Commons, Forest Sciences Commons, Horticulture Commons, Other Plant Sciences Commons, and the Viticulture and Oenology Commons Tell us how this article helped you. Repository Citation Creech, David; Grant, Greg; Kroll, James; and Stover, Dawn, "4th Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference" (2008). Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference. 6. https://scholarworks.sfasu.edu/sfa_gardens_lonestar/6 This Book is brought to you for free and open access by the SFA Gardens at SFA ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Lone Star Regional Native Plant Conference by an authorized administrator of SFA ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. • In 00 5' --. , In Associqtion with the cullowhee Nqtive plqnt Confetence Ptoceec!ings ofthe 4th Lone Stat Regional Native Plant Confetence Hoste~ by Stephen F. Austin St~te University Pineywoods N~tive PI~nt Centel' N~cogdoches, Texqs M~y 28-31,2008 Proceed ings ofthe 4th
    [Show full text]