Arxiv:2012.05916V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 10 Dec 2020 Side in Two Parallel Conducting Layers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Crossover between Strongly-coupled and Weakly-coupled Exciton Superfluids Xiaomeng Liu1y, J.I.A. Li2y, Kenji Watanabe3, Takashi Taniguchi4, James Hone5, Bertrand I. Halperin1, Philip Kim1∗, and Cory R. Dean6∗ y X.Liu and J.I.A.Li contributed equally to this work 1 Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 2Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA 3Research Center for Functional Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan 4International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA and 6Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA In fermionic systems, superconductivity and inter-particle separation. In this strongly coupled limit, superfluidity are enabled through the condensa- the system behaves like a bosonic gas or liquid, instead tion of fermion pairs. The nature of this con- of a Fermi liquid, and the low temperature ground state densate can be tuned by varying the pairing is characterized by a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). strength, with weak coupling yielding a BCS- A crossover between the BEC and BCS regimes can like condensate and strong coupling resulting theoretically be realized by tuning the ratio of U=EF [5{ in a BEC-like process. However, demonstra- 7], which also corresponds to tuning the ratio of the tion of this cross-over has remained elusive in `size' of the fermion pairs versus the inter-bosonic par- electronic systems. Here we study graphene ticle spacing. In solid state systems, where the most double-layers separated by an atomically thin prominent fermionic condensates, i.e. superconductors, insulator. Under applied magnetic field, elec- are found, the BEC-BCS crossover paradigm is highly trons and holes couple across the barrier to form relevant since, while most metallic superconductors are bound magneto-excitons whose pairing strength understood to be in the BCS limit, some unconventional can be continuously tuned by varying the effective superconductors, such as the high-Tc cuprates [3, 8{ layer separation. Using temperature-dependent 10], and twisted bilayer graphene [11] are thought to Coulomb drag and counter-flow current measure- reside near the crossover (U ∼ EF ) between the BEC ments, we demonstrate the capability to tune and BCS limits. In cold-fermion gasses, continuous tun- the magneto-exciton condensate through the en- ing between the weak-coupling and strong-coupling limits tire weak-coupling to strong-coupling phase dia- has been demonstrated, and the unitary crossover regime gram. Our results establish magneto-exciton con- firmly established [12{17]. Demonstration of this same densates in graphene as a model platform to study crossover in a solid state platform (i.e. within a single the crossover between two Bosonic quantum con- electronic superconductor) has not been experimentally densate phases in a solid state system. realized owing to the inability to continuously tune the coupling strength (e.g. vary U at fixed E ), or the elec- In the presence of attractive interactions, a fermionic F tron density (vary E at fixed U) sufficiently while main- system can become unstable against pairing, forming F taining the condensate ground state [18, 19] . composite bosons. These paired fermions then can yield a low temperature condensate phase. It has long been rec- In this work, we examine the crossover behavior of the ognized that the nature of the fermionic condensate and condensate phase of magneto-excitons in quantum Hall its phase transition is directly governed by the strength bilayer (QHB) systems. Superfluidic magneto-exciton of the pairing interaction U compared with the Fermi en- condensation was first realized in QHBs fabricated from GaAs heterostructures [20] and subsequently graphene ergy EF as shown in Fig. 1a [1{3]. Electrons in metals provide a paradigm example of the weak coupling regime, double-layers [21, 22]. Here, electron-like and hole-like where pairing interaction is small compared to the Fermi quasi-particles of partially filled Landau levels (LLs) re- arXiv:2012.05916v1 [cond-mat.mes-hall] 10 Dec 2020 side in two parallel conducting layers. At integer values energy (U EF ). A low temperature superconducting phase emerges from this weakly interacting Fermi liquid, of the combined LL filling fraction νtot = νtop + νbot, described by the Bardeen{Cooper{Schrieffer (BCS) the- where νtop (νbot) is the filling fraction of the top (bot- ory [4]. In this regime, electrons near the Fermi surface tom) layer, electrons in one layer and holes in the other pair in momentum space, with the size of the resulting layer can pair up, forming interlayer excitons that then Cooper pair usually much larger than inter-particle dis- condense into a superfluid state at low temperatures [20]. tance [2]. In the opposite limit of strong interactions Unlike metallic superconductors, the QHB systems (U EF ), fermions form spatially tightly bound pairs, have the advantage that pairing between fermions is and the size of the pair is much smaller than the average widely tunable. Since the kinetic energy of electrons 2 a e 0.3 0.4 d/l Tpair e-h plasma d=3.7nm 0.5 B 0.6 0.7 exciton gas e-h Fermi liquid ky ) 20 (k F k x CF xx R 10 T/E Tc 0 condensation 0 20 ky 5 10 15 15 10 B(T) 20 T(K) k x 25 5 BEC BCS 0.3 0.4 f d/lB EF/U d=3.7nm 0.5 b c 0.6 lB 0.7 1 E ) intra 2 (h/e 0.5 drag xy d R U 5μm 0 0 20 5 10 15 15 B(T) 10 T(K) 20 25 5 d B=15T, T=0.3K B=15T, T=0.3K g 2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 d/l 20 B Drag 40 Counter flow d=3.7nm III 15 5kΩ/K 30 II 1 20 10 dR /dT T(K) CF xx drive R (h/e2) CF xy R xy (kΩ) drag 2 10 CF 5 R xy (h/e ) R xx (kΩ) drag I 2 R xx (h/e ) 0 0 0 0 -6/5 -1 -4/5 -6/5 -1 -4/5 0510 15 20 25 νtot νtot B(T) FIG. 1. j Two regimes of exciton condensate. a, Schematic phase diagram for equal densities of electrons and holes, with varying temperature and coupling strength. In the strong coupling limit (EF =U 1), the electrons (orange circles) and holes (blue circles) start to pair at Tpair and condense at much lower temperature Tc. The green halo signifies the condensate. In the weak coupling limit (EF =U 1), the electrons and holes exist as Fermi liquids at high temperatures and establish BCS type of pairing below Tc. kx and ky are wave-vectors in the x and y direction, while the green lines denote pairing between electrons and holes on the Fermi surface. b, Schematic showing the energy and length scales associated with exciton pairing in a graphene double-layer structure under a magnetic field. Interlayer Coulomb coupling U depends on the interlayer separation d, whereas intralayer Coulomb repulsion Eintra is determined by the magnetic length `B . c, Optical image of a graphene double-layer device used in this study. d, Left panel: Couloub drag response of exciton condensate at νtot = −1. Inset, schematic for drag measurement setup, arrow indicates the direction of current flow in the drive layer. Right panel: longitudinal and Hall resistance in counterflow geometry measured at νtot = −1. Inset, schematic for counterflow measurement setup. Arrows indicate the direction of current flow in each layer. e, Waterfall plot of longitudinal resistance from counterflow measurement as a function of temperature measured at different B. White line marks the superfluid transition temperature, CF Tc, where Rxx drop to near zero. f, Waterfall plot of Hall drag response as a function of temperature measured at different B. Black dahsed line marks the pairing temperature Tpair, where the Hall drag is half of the quantized value. g, Temperature CF derivative of Rxx as a function of temperature T and magnetic field B. The black solid and dashed lines mark Tc and Tpair, respectively, according to the definition in panel e and f. The corresponding d=`B value is marked on the top axis. Area I corresponds to a condensate, area II normal states of excitons and area III normal states of disassociated electrons and holes. 3 is quenched in the LLs, the energetics of this system is the two layers[36]. In this geometry the neutral exci- determined by the competition between the intralayer ton current gives a zero valued Hall resistance in both 2 Coulomb interaction Eintra = e /`B (in Gaussian cgs layers, while the dissipationless nature of the superfluid p units) where `B = ~=eB is the magnetic length and condensate is revealed by a vanishing longitudinal resis- is the background dielectric constant, and the attractive tance (Fig. 1d). interlayer Coulomb interaction between an isolated elec- Figures 1e & f show the temperature dependence of the 2 CF tron and hole in the lowest LL, U ≈ (e /)=(d + 0:8 `B), counterflow longitudinal resistance Rxx and Hall drag drag where d is the interlayer separation (Fig. 1b) [See Sup- resistance Rxy of a d=3.7nm device, for different val- plementary Materials (SM)]. For an isolated layer with a ues of d=`Bwhich is tuned by varying the magnetic field partially filled LL, a Chern-Simons gauge transformation B (also see Fig. S1). At low temperatures, the exciton can turn its strongly-interacting electrons with Eintra to superfluid phase is observed over the full range of effec- a composite Fermi liquid with Fermi energy EF / Eintra tive layer separation that we studied, 0:3 < d=`B< 0:8, CF [23].