Fermionic Condensation in Ultracold Atoms, Nuclear Matter and Neutron Stars

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Fermionic Condensation in Ultracold Atoms, Nuclear Matter and Neutron Stars Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Related content - Condensate fraction of asymmetric three- Fermionic condensation in ultracold atoms, component Fermi gas Du Jia-Jia, Liang Jun-Jun and Liang Jiu- nuclear matter and neutron stars Qing - S-Wave Scattering Properties for Na—K Cold Collisions To cite this article: Luca Salasnich 2014 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 497 012026 Zhang Ji-Cai, Zhu Zun-Lue, Sun Jin-Feng et al. - Landau damping in a dipolar Bose–Fermi mixture in the Bose–Einstein condensation (BEC) limit View the article online for updates and enhancements. S M Moniri, H Yavari and E Darsheshdar This content was downloaded from IP address 170.106.40.139 on 26/09/2021 at 20:46 22nd International Laser Physics Worksop (LPHYS 13) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 497 (2014) 012026 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/497/1/012026 Fermionic condensation in ultracold atoms, nuclear matter and neutron stars Luca Salasnich Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia “Galileo Galilei” and CNISM, Universit`a di Padova, Via Marzolo 8, 35131 Padova, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. We investigate the Bose-Einstein condensation of fermionic pairs in three different superfluid systems: ultracold and dilute atomic gases, bulk neutron matter, and neutron stars. In the case of dilute gases made of fermionic atoms the average distance between atoms is much larger than the effective radius of the inter-atomic potential. Here the condensation of fermionic pairs is analyzed as a function of the s-wave scattering length, which can be tuned in experiments by using the technique of Feshbach resonances from a small and negative value (corresponding to the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) regime of Cooper Fermi pairs) to a small and positive value (corresponding to the regime of the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) of molecular dimers), crossing the unitarity regime where the scattering length diverges. In the case of bulk neutron matter the s-wave scattering length of neutron-neutron potential is negative but fixed, and the condensate fraction of neutron-neutron pairs is studied as a function of the total neutron density. Our results clearly show a BCS-quasiunitary-BCS crossover by increasing the neutron density. Finally, in the case of neutron stars, where again the neutron-neutron scattering length is negative and fixed, we determine the condensate fraction as a function of the distance from the center of the neutron star, finding that the maximum condensate fraction appears in the crust of the neutron star. 1. Introduction In 1951 Penrose [1] and Onsager [2] introduced the idea of off-diagonal long-range order (ODLRO) of the one-body density matrix to determine the Bose-Einstein condensate fraction in a system of interacting bosons. In 1962 Yang [3] proved that for attractive fermions the Bose-Einstein condensation of fermionic pairs is instead related to the ODLRO of the two-body density matrix. It is now established that at zero temperature the Bose-Einstein condensate fraction of bosonic liquid 4He is below 10% [5], while for dilute and ultracold bosonic alkali-metal atoms it can reach 100% [4]. Some years ago, by using the ODLRO of the two-body density matrix, Salasnich, Manini and Parola [6] calculated the condensate fraction of fermionic pairs in the crossover from the Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) state of Cooper Fermi pairs to the Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) of molecular dimers at zero temperature (later in the same year there were other two papers [7, 8] on the same topic). In particular, it was found that the condensate fraction grows from zero to one in the BCS-BEC crossover [6, 7, 8]. These theoretical predictions are in quite good agreement with the data obtained in two experiments [9, 10] with Fermi vapors of 6Li atoms. Recently, the condensate fraction of bulk neutron matter has been calculated by Wlazlowski and Magierski [11, 12] and also by Salasnich [13]. Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1 22nd International Laser Physics Worksop (LPHYS 13) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 497 (2014) 012026 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/497/1/012026 In this paper we review the zero-temperature mean-field theory we have used to extract the fermionic condensate fraction in ultracold atoms [6] and bulk neutron matter [13]. In addition we determine the condensate fraction of neutron-neutron pairs as a function of the distance from the center of a neutron star [14, 15]. In particular, we find the maximum condensate fraction at the distance r/R 0.96, where R is the star radius. 2. Bosonic and fermionic condensation A quantum system of interacting identical bosons can be described by the bosonic field operator φˆ(r), which satisfies the familiar commutation rules [16] φˆ(r), φˆ+(r) = δ(r − r) , φˆ(r), φˆ(r) = φˆ+(r), φˆ+(r) =0, (1) where A,ˆ Bˆ = AˆBˆ − BˆAˆ and δ(r) is the Dirac delta function. The bosonic one-body density matrix is given by n(r, r)=φˆ+(r) φˆ(r) , (2) where the average ···can be a thermal average or a zero-temperature average. Its diagonal part is the average local density of bosons, i.e. n(r)=n(r, r)=φˆ+(r) φˆ(r), while the average total number of bosons reads N = φˆ+(r) φˆ(r) d3r . (3) As previously discussed, Penrose and Onsager [1, 2] used the ODLRO of the one-body density matrix of a uniform bosonic system to determine the condensate number N0 of bosons. For a non- uniform bosonic system this condensate number N0 is nothing else than the largest eigenvalue of the one-body density matrix [16]. As shown by Yukalov [17], in the thermodynamic limit this is equivalent to the spontaneous symmetry breaking of U(1) gauge symmetry, which gives 2 3 N0 = |φˆ(r)| d r (4) as the average number of condensed bosons. A quantum system of interacting identical fermions with two spin components (σ =↑, ↓)can be described by the fermionic field operator ψˆσ(r), which satisfies the familiar anti-commutation rules [16] ˆ ˆ+ ˆ ˆ ˆ+ ˆ+ ψσ(r), ψσ (r ) = δ(r − r ) δσ,σ , ψσ(r), ψσ (r ) = ψσ (r), ψσ (r ) =0, (5) where A,ˆ Bˆ = AˆBˆ + BˆAˆ and δσ,σ is the Kronecher symbol. The fermionic one-body density matrix is given by + nσ,σ (r, r )=ψˆσ (r) ψˆσ (r ) . (6) Its diagonal part is the average local density of fermions with spin σ, i.e. nσ(r)=nσ,σ (r, r)= + ψˆσ (r) ψˆσ(r), while the average total number of fermions reads + 3 N = ψˆσ (r) ψˆσ(r) d r . (7) σ=↑,↓ Yang [3] suggested that for a uniform strongly-interacting fermionic system the number N0 of Bose-condensed fermions, that is twice the number of condensed fermionic pairs, is related by the ODLRO of the fermionic two-body density matrix, given by + + 1 2 ˆ 1 ˆ 2 ˆ ˆ nσ1,σ2,σ1,σ2 (r , r , r1, r2)= ψσ1 (r ) ψσ2 (r ) ψσ2 (r2) ψσ1 (r1) . (8) 2 22nd International Laser Physics Worksop (LPHYS 13) IOP Publishing Journal of Physics: Conference Series 497 (2014) 012026 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/497/1/012026 For a generic (non-uniform) strongly-interacting system of identical fermions this condensate number N0 is nothing else than twice the largest eigenvalue of the fermionic two-body density matrix [16]. In the thermodynamic limit this is equivalent [18] to the spontaneous symmetry breaking of SU(2) gauge symmetry, which gives 2 3 3 N0 =2 |ψˆσ(r) ψˆσ (r )| d r d r (9) σ,σ=↑,↓ as the average number of condensed fermions. It is important to stress that within the BCS theory of superconductors and fermionic superfluids the condensate number N0 fermions can be much smaller than the average total number of fermions N. Moreover, in a uniform system N0 is twice the average number of fermionic pairs in the (pseudo) Bose-Einstein condensate, i.e. the number of fermionic pairs which have their center of mass with zero linear momentum. 3. Ultracold and dilute atomic gases The shifted Hamiltonian of the uniform two-spin-component Fermi superfluid made of ultracold atoms is given by 2 ˆ 3 ˆ+ 2 ˆ ˆ+ ˆ+ ˆ ˆ H = d r ψσ (r) − ∇ − μ ψσ(r)+g ψ↑ (r) ψ↓ (r) ψ↓(r) ψ↑(r) , (10) σ=↑,↓ 2m where ψˆσ(r) is the field operator that annihilates a fermion of spin σ in the position r, while + ψˆσ (r) creates a fermion of spin σ in r.Hereg<0 is the strength of the attractive fermion- fermion interaction, which is approximated by a contract Fermi pseudo-potential [4] because for ultracold and dilute gases the average distance between atoms is much larger than the effective radius of the inter-atomic potential [4, 16]. The ground-state average of the number of fermions is given by Eq. (7). This total number N is fixed by the chemical potential μ which appears in Eq. (10). Within the Bogoliubov approach the mean-field Hamiltonian derived from Eq. (10) can be diagonalized by using the Bogoliubov-Valatin representation of the field operator ψˆσ(r)interms of the anti-commuting quasi-particle Bogoliubov operators ˆbkσ with amplitudes uk and vk and the quasi-particle energy Ek. In this way one finds familiar expressions for these quantities: 2 2 1/2 Ek = (k − μ) +Δ (11) and 2 uk =(1+(k − μ)/Ek) /2 (12) 2 vk =(1− (k − μ)/Ek) /2 , (13) 2 2 where k = k /(2m) is the single-particle energy.
Recommended publications
  • Realization of Bose-Einstein Condensation in Dilute Gases
    Realization of Bose-Einstein Condensation in dilute gases Guang Bian May 3, 2008 Abstract: This essay describes theoretical aspects of Bose-Einstein Condensation and the first experimental realization of BEC in dilute alkali gases. In addition, some recent experimental progress related to BEC are reported. 1 Introduction A Bose–Einstein condensate is a state of matter of bosons confined in an external potential and cooled to temperatures very near to absolute zero. Under such supercooled conditions, a large fraction of the atoms collapse into the lowest quantum state of the external potential, at which point quantum effects become apparent on a macroscopic scale. When a bosonic system is cooled below the critical temperature of Bose-Einstein condensation, the behavior of the system will change dramatically, because the condensed particles behaving like a single quantum entity. In this section, I will review the early history of Bose- Einstein Condensation. In 1924, the Indian physicist Satyendra Nath Bose proposed a new derivation of the Planck radiation law. In his derivation, he found that the indistinguishability of particle was the key point to reach the radiation law and he for the first time took the position that the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution would not be true for microscopic particles where fluctuations due to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle will be significant. In the following year Einstein generalized Bose’s method to ideal gases and he showed that the quantum gas would undergo a phase transition at a sufficiently low temperature when a large fraction of the atoms would condense into the lowest energy state. At that time Einstein doubted the strange nature of his prediction and he wrote to Ehrenfest the following sentences, ‘From a certain temperature on, the molecules “condense” without attractive forces, that is, they accumulate at zero velocity.
    [Show full text]
  • States of Matter Part I
    States of Matter Part I. The Three Common States: Solid, Liquid and Gas David Tin Win Faculty of Science and Technology, Assumption University Bangkok, Thailand Abstract There are three basic states of matter that can be identified: solid, liquid, and gas. Solids, being compact with very restricted movement, have definite shapes and volumes; liquids, with less compact makeup have definite volumes, take the shape of the containers; and gases, composed of loose particles, have volumes and shapes that depend on the container. This paper is in two parts. A short description of the common states (solid, liquid and gas) is described in Part I. This is followed by a general observation of three additional states (plasma, Bose-Einstein Condensate, and Fermionic Condensate) in Part II. Keywords: Ionic solids, liquid crystals, London forces, metallic solids, molecular solids, network solids, quasicrystals. Introduction out everywhere within the container. Gases can be compressed easily and they have undefined shapes. This paper is in two parts. The common It is well known that heating will cause or usual states of matter: solid, liquid and gas substances to change state - state conversion, in or vapor1, are mentioned in Part I; and the three accordance with their enthalpies of fusion ∆H additional states: plasma, Bose-Einstein f condensate (BEC), and Fermionic condensate or vaporization ∆Hv, or latent heats of fusion are described in Part II. and vaporization. For example, ice will be Solid formation occurs when the converted to water (fusion) and thence to vapor attraction between individual particles (atoms (vaporization). What happens if a gas is super- or molecules) is greater than the particle energy heated to very high temperatures? What happens (mainly kinetic energy or heat) causing them to if it is cooled to near absolute zero temperatures? move apart.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving a Strongly Interacting Superfluid out of Equilibrium
    Driving a Strongly Interacting Superfluid out of Equilibrium Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (Dr. rer. nat.) der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn von Alexandra Bianca Behrle Bonn, 27.07.2017 Dieser Forschungsbericht wurde als Dissertation von der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Bonn angenommen und ist auf dem Hochschulschriftenserver der ULB Bonn http://hss.ulb.uni-bonn.de/diss_online elektronisch publiziert. 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Michael Köhl 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. Stefan Linden Tag der Promotion: 21.12.2017 Erscheinungsjahr: 2018 To my parents and my sister iii "Fortunately science, like that nature to which it belongs, is neither limited by time nor by space. It belongs to the world, and is of no country and no age. The more we know, the more we feel our ignorance; the more we feel how much remains unknown..." -Humphry Davy, the discoverer of the element sodium and the eponym of our experiment. iv Abstract A new field of research, which gained interest in the past years, is the field of non- equilibrium physics of strongly interacting fermionic systems. In this thesis we present a novel apparatus to study an ultracold strongly interacting superfluid Fermi gas driven out of equilibrium. In more detail, we study the excitation of a collective mode, the Higgs mode, and the dynamics occurring after a rapid quench of the interaction strength. Ultracold gases are ideal candidates to explore the physics of strongly inter- acting Fermi gases due to their purity and the possibility to continuously change many different system parameters, such as the interaction strength.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermi Condensates
    ��� ���� � �� ������ �� ������� ����� ����������� ��� ��������������� ��������� �� ���� ������ ����� �� � �� ���� ���� ����� ����������� ��������� ��� ������ ������� ���������� �� �������� �� �������� ��� ICTP SCHOOL ON QUANTUM PHASE TRANSITIONS AND NON-EQUILIBRIUM PHENOMENA IN COLD ATOMIC GASES 2005 Fermi condensates Markus Greiner JILA, Group of D. Jin; Coworkers: C. Regal and J. Stewart NIST and the University of Colorado, Boulder Highly controlled many-body quantum systems Weakly interacting Bose gases: Coherence, superfluid flow, vortices … Strongly correlated Bose systems: Superfluid to Mott insulator transition Fermionic superfluidity: BCS-BEC crossover physics • Condensed matter physics studied with an atomic physics system Outline: • Fermionic superfluidity; The tools: trapping, cooling, probing; • Controlling interactions; Molecular Bose-Einstein condensate; Fermi condensate: Generalized Cooper pairs in the BCS-BEC crossover; • Probing the fermion momentum distribution • Detecting atom-atom correlations via atom shot noise; Bosons Fermions integer spin half-integer spin <1,2 = <2,1 <1,2 = -<2,1 Æ Bosonic Æ Pauli exclusion enhancement principle EF= kbTF spin n spin p 1995: Bose-Einstein condensation 1999: Fermi sea of atoms e.g. 87Rb, 23Na, H, 39K … 40K, 6Li photons, liquid 4He electrons, protons, neutrons Pairing and Superfluidity Æ Spin is additive: Fermions can pair up and form effective bosons: <(1,…,N) =  [ I(1,2) I(3,4) … I(N-1,N) ] spin n spin p Molecules of Generalized Cooper Cooper pairs fermionic atoms pairs of fermionic atoms kF BEC of weakly BCS - BEC BCS superconductivity bound molecules crossover Cooper pairs: correlated momentum-space pairing BCS-BEC crossover for example: Eagles, Leggett, Nozieres and Schmitt-Rink, Randeria, Strinati, Zwerger, Holland, Timmermans, Griffin, Levin … Cooling a gas of fermionic 40K atoms 1. Laser cooling and trapping of 40K 300 K to 1 mK a109 atoms 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Cold Fermions, Feshbach Resonance, and Molecular Condensates (II)
    Cold fermions, Feshbach resonance, and molecular condensates (II) D. Jin JILA, NIST and the University of Colorado I. Cold fermions II. Feshbach resonance III. BCS-BEC crossover (Experiments at JILA) $$ NSF, NIST, Hertz Boulder School 2004 I. Cold Fermions Boulder School 2004 Quantum Particles ¾ There are two types of quantum particles found in nature - bosons and fermions. Bosons like to do the same thing. Fermions are independent-minded. ¾ Atoms, depending on their composition, can be either. bosons: 87Rb, 23Na, 7Li, H, 39K, 4He*, 85Rb, 133Cs fermions: 40K, 6Li Boulder School 2004 Bosons . integer spin . Ψ1,2 = Ψ2,1 Atoms in a harmonic potential. Bose-Einstein condensation 1995 other bosons: photons, liquid 4He Boulder School 2004 Fermions . half-integer spin . Ψ1,2 = - Ψ2,1 (Pauli exclusion principle) T = 0 EF= kbTF spin ↑ spin ↓ Fermi sea of atoms 1999 other fermions: protons, electrons, neutrons Boulder School 2004 Quantum gases Bosons TC BEC phase transition Fermions TF Fermi sea of atoms gradually emerges for T<TF d λdeBroglie ∼ d ultralow T Boulder School 2004 Fermionic atoms 40 6 K Jin, JILA Li Hulet, Rice Inguscio, LENS Salomon, ENS Thomas, Duke Ketterle, MIT Grimm, Innsbruck others in progress… Future: Cr, Sr, Yb, radioactive isotopes Rb, metastable *He, *Ne … Boulder School 2004 Cooling fermions Evaporative cooling requires collisions, but at low T identical fermions stop colliding . Boulder School 2004 Cooling strategies for fermions Simultaneous cooling evaporate atoms in two spin-states magnetic trap 40K optical trap 6Li Sympathetic cooling evaporate bosonic atoms and cool fermionic atoms via thermal contact two isotopes 7Li + 6Li two species 87Rb + 40K 23Na + 6Li Boulder School 2004 40K spin-states 4P3/2 ~1014 Hz hyperfine f=7/2 Zeeman 9 m = 9/2 6 7 ~10 Hz f ~10 -10 Hz 4S1/2 mf= 7/2 .
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Contents (Print)
    NEWSPAPER 96 Spin-resolved differential conductance image of cobalt islands on a copper surface. The dots are standing wave patterns of surface state electrons, spin polarized on the islands, but not on the substrate. See article 237203. PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS PRL 96 (23), 230401– 239903, 16 June 2006 (264 total pages) Contents Articles published 10 June–16 June 2006 VOLUME 96, NUMBER 23 16 June 2006 General Physics: Statistical and Quantum Mechanics, Quantum Information, etc. Biased Tomography Schemes: An Objective Approach ................................................................ 230401 Z. Hradil, D. Mogilevtsev, and J. Rˇ eha´cˇek Vortex-Lattice Melting in a One-Dimensional Optical Lattice ......................................................... 230402 Michiel Snoek and H. T. Stoof Synchronization in the BCS Pairing Dynamics as a Critical Phenomenon ............................................ 230403 R. A. Barankov and L. S. Levitov Dynamical Vanishing of the Order Parameter in a Fermionic Condensate ............................................ 230404 Emil A. Yuzbashyan and Maxim Dzero Entanglement of Two Impurities through Electron Scattering ......................................................... 230501 A. T. Costa, Jr., S. Bose, and Y. Omar Decoherence in a System of Many Two-Level Atoms ................................................................ 230502 Daniel Braun Anomalous Diffusion of Inertial, Weakly Damped Particles ........................................................... 230601 R. Friedrich, F. Jenko, A.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2012.05916V1 [Cond-Mat.Mes-Hall] 10 Dec 2020 Side in Two Parallel Conducting Layers
    Crossover between Strongly-coupled and Weakly-coupled Exciton Superfluids Xiaomeng Liu1y, J.I.A. Li2y, Kenji Watanabe3, Takashi Taniguchi4, James Hone5, Bertrand I. Halperin1, Philip Kim1∗, and Cory R. Dean6∗ y X.Liu and J.I.A.Li contributed equally to this work 1 Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA 2Department of Physics, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA 3Research Center for Functional Materials, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan 4International Center for Materials Nanoarchitectonics, National Institute for Materials Science, 1-1 Namiki, Tsukuba 305-0044, Japan 5Department of Mechanical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA and 6Department of Physics, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA In fermionic systems, superconductivity and inter-particle separation. In this strongly coupled limit, superfluidity are enabled through the condensa- the system behaves like a bosonic gas or liquid, instead tion of fermion pairs. The nature of this con- of a Fermi liquid, and the low temperature ground state densate can be tuned by varying the pairing is characterized by a Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC). strength, with weak coupling yielding a BCS- A crossover between the BEC and BCS regimes can like condensate and strong coupling resulting theoretically be realized by tuning the ratio of U=EF [5{ in a BEC-like process. However, demonstra- 7], which also corresponds to tuning the ratio of the tion of this cross-over has remained elusive in `size' of the fermion pairs versus the inter-bosonic par- electronic systems. Here we study graphene ticle spacing. In solid state systems, where the most double-layers separated by an atomically thin prominent fermionic condensates, i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Resonantly Paired Fermionic Superfluids
    Annals of Physics 322 (2007) 2–119 www.elsevier.com/locate/aop Resonantly paired fermionic superfluids V. Gurarie *, L. Radzihovsky Department of Physics, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA Received 28 October 2006; accepted 28 October 2006 Abstract We present a theory of a degenerate atomic Fermi gas, interacting through a narrow Feshbach resonance, whose position and therefore strength can be tuned experimentally, as demonstrated recently in ultracold trapped atomic gases. The distinguishing feature of the theory is that its accu- racy is controlled by a dimensionless parameter proportional to the ratio of the width of the reso- nance to Fermi energy. The theory is therefore quantitatively accurate for a narrow Feshbach resonance. In the case of a narrow s-wave resonance, our analysis leads to a quantitative description of the crossover between a weakly paired BCS superconductor of overlapping Cooper pairs and a strongly paired molecular Bose–Einstein condensate of diatomic molecules. In the case of pairing via a p-wave resonance, that we show is always narrow for a sufficiently low density, we predict a detuning-temperature phase diagram, that in the course of a BCS–BEC crossover can exhibit a host of thermodynamically distinct phases separated by quantum and classical phase transitions. For an intermediate strength of the dipolar anisotropy, the system exhibits a px +ipy paired superfluidity that undergoes a topological phase transition between a weakly coupled gapless ground state at large positive detuning and a strongly paired fully gapped molecular superfluid for a negative detuning. In two dimensions the former state is characterized by a Pfaffian ground state exhibiting topological order and non-Abelian vortex excitations familiar from fractional quantum Hall systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Fermionic First for Condensates (March 2004) - Physics World - Physicsweb
    Fermionic first for condensates (March 2004) - Physics World - PhysicsWeb http://physicsweb.org/articles/world/17/3/3#pwpia1_03-04 Go Advanced site search physics world << previous article Physics World next article >> Physics World alerts March 2004 Register or sign in to our news alerting Fermionic first for condensates service or to alter your Physics in Action: March 2004 alert settings The creation of the first fermionic condensate will herald a new generation of research into the properties of Links superfluids and superconductors Since the first gaseous Bose-Einstein Related Links condensate was created in 1995, the field of Keith Burnett Theory ultracold matter has developed rapidly. We all Group at Oxford knew from the start, however, that the Deborah Jin Group potential for the field would explode if « Previous Next » Cool customer condensates could be made from fermions as Restricted Links well as bosons. For this reason, we were stunned and delighted sample issue Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 to learn that Deborah Jin, Cindy Regal and Markus Greiner at 040403 Request a sample issue the JILA laboratory in the US have created the first fermionic browse the archive condensate by cooling a gas of potassium atoms to nanokelvin Related Stories temperatures (Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 040403). Known as "holy 2004 Fermionic condensate grail two" in the ultracold-matter community, fermionic makes its debut March condensates could have an enormous impact on other areas of A Fermi gas of atoms Contents physics as well. A Bose-Einstein condensate is a peculiar phase of matter in Quantum gases come of age 2004 which all the particles in a system occupy the same quantum state.
    [Show full text]
  • Ultracold Bosonic and Fermionic Gases
    DULOV 06-ch02-009-018-9780123877796 2011/5/27 10:40 Page 19 #11 To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter diacriTech. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication. Levin 01-fm-i-iv-9780444538574 2012/5/9 3:18 Page iii #3 Series: Contemporary Concepts of Condensed Matter Science Series Editors: E. Burstein, M. L. Cohen, D. L. Mills and P. J. Stiles Ultracold Bosonic and Fermionic Gases Kathryn Levin University of Chicago Chicago, IL 60637 levin@jfi.uchicago.edu Alexander L. Fetter Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305 [email protected] Dan M. Stamper-Kurn University of California Berkeley, CA 94720-7300 [email protected] Amsterdam – Boston – Heidelberg – London – New York – Oxford Paris – San Diego – San Francisco – Singapore – Sydney – Tokyo To protect the rights of the author(s) and publisher we inform you that this PDF is an uncorrected proof for internal business use only by the author(s), editor(s), reviewer(s), Elsevier and typesetter diacriTech. It is not allowed to publish this proof online or in print. This proof copy is the copyright property of the publisher and is confidential until formal publication. Levin 01-fm-i-iv-9780444538574 2012/5/9 3:18 Page iv #4 Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK Radarweg 29, PO Box 211, 1000 AE Amsterdam, The Netherlands First edition 2012 Copyright c 2012 Elsevier B.V.
    [Show full text]
  • Excitation Spectrum of a Fermionic Condensate
    Excitation spectrum of a fermionic condensate Hadrien Kurkjian, Serghei Klimin, Senne Van Loon, Jacques Tempere, Alice Sinatra & Yvan Castin UAntwerpen - LKB - ENS - Université Paul Sabatier (Toulouse) 16 novembre 2020 Excitation spectrum of a fermionic condensate Pair-condensed Fermi gases Condensate of pairs of fermionic atoms, BCS-BEC crossover Experiments in Yale (N. Navon), MIT (M.Zwierlein), Lens (G. Roati), Swinburne (Vale)... Single-particle excitations Collective modes Phonons • • Higgs modes = • • Excitation) • Pairing mode BCS (T Tc) • • ≈ Excitation spectrum of a fermionic condensate Method: Linear Response (in RPA) 2 2 Z X ~ k y 3 y y H^ = µ a^ a^k + g d r ^ (r) ^ (r) ^#(r) ^"(r); 0 2m − k 0 " # k response to drive forces: Z " # ^ 3 ^y ^y X ^y ^ Hdrive = d r φ(r; t) " # + h.c + u(r; t) σ σ σ Density and pair-field response to the drive 0 1 0 1 i∆δθ 2Re(φ) −1 @δ ∆ A = χ(!; q) @2iIm(φ)A ; det χ (zq; q) = 0 δρj j u z Im 2∆ ~ω2(q) q q 2 + k 0 ~ω×B,q × × Rez q k + q • • z q k k ×q 2 − Excitation spectrum of a fermionic condensate Higgs modes 2.4 2 2 2.3 µ ~ q 3 zq = 2∆ + ζ + O(q ) 2.2 ∆ 2.1 ∆ 2m / q 2 ω ~ 1.9 1.8 1.7 3.5 3 2.5 ∆ / q 2 Γ ~ 1.5 1 0.5 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 qξ So far measurements only in q = 0 (quench of interactions).
    [Show full text]
  • Superfluid Theory
    University of California Los Angeles Superfluid Theory: Vortex Theory of the Phase Transition, Pressure Dependencies in Equilibrated Three-Dimensional Bulk, and Vortex Pair Density in Quenched Two-Dimensional Film A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Physics by Andrew Wade Forrester 2012 Abstract of the Dissertation Superfluid Theory: Vortex Theory of the Phase Transition, Pressure Dependencies in Equilibrated Three-Dimensional Bulk, and Vortex Pair Density in Quenched Two-Dimensional Film by Andrew Wade Forrester Doctor of Philosophy in Physics University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Gary A. Williams, Chair The vortex theory of the helium-4-type superfluid phase transition, in both the 3D-bulk form and 2D-film form, is herein explained and intuitively derived. New evidence is provided supporting the accuracy of the 3D vortex loop theory in equilibrium over all pressures up to the solidification point. We show that the 3D theory consistently de- scribes, within about 200 µK below Tλ, the pressure dependence of the helium superfluid fraction, heat capacity, vortex-loop core diameter, smallest-loop energy, and universal quantity X, which relates to an algebraic combination of the superfluid-fraction and specific-heat critical amplitudes. We suggest that the smallest vortex loops of the theory, with size on the order of angstroms, may be crude approximations for rotons. We also present a new exact analytic solution for the 2D non-equilibrium dynamics of vortex pairs in rapid temperature quenches. ii The dissertation of Andrew Wade Forrester is approved. Robijn F. Bruinsma Paul H. Roberts Joseph A.
    [Show full text]