MATTHEWS LANE GORTON, MANCHESTER ECOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT
TEP Genesis Centre Birchwood Science Park Warrington WA3 7BH
Tel: 01925 844004 Email: [email protected] www.tep.uk.com
Offices in Warrington, Market Harborough, Gateshead, London and Cornwall
PLANNING I DESIGN I ENVIRONMENT
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Document Title Ecological Assessment
Prepared for Laing O'Rourke Northern Ltd
Prepared by TEP - Warrington
Document Ref 6150.001
Author Fleur Wilson
Date January 2017
Checked Emma Pickering
Approved Lee Greenhough
Amendment History
Check / Modified Version Date Approved Reason(s) issue Status by by
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
CONTENTS PAGE Executive Summary ...... 2 1.0 Introduction ...... 3 2.0 Site Description ...... 4 3.0 Methods ...... 5 4.0 Results ...... 7 5.0 Conclusion ...... 16 6.0 Recommendations ...... 18 References ...... 21
TABLES PAGE Table 1: Ecological information and consultations...... 5 Table 2: Bat Roost Assessment Criteria 2016...... 6 Table 3: WCA1, S41 & BoCC bird records within search area ...... 8
FIGURES PAGE Figure 1: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2016 ...... 4 Figure 2: Woodland parcel in the south of the site; semi-natural broad-leaved woodland. This habitat on site is dominated by regenerated broad-leaved trees with occasional occurrences of planted coniferous specimens...... 10 Figure 3: Modified neutral grassland/ marshy grassland mosaic, with scattered scrub...... 11 Figure 4: Ephemeral pools in the south of the site ...... 12 Figure 5: Waterbody in the north of the site ...... 12 Figure 6: Waterbody in the woodland in the west of the site ...... 12 Figure 7: Ephemeral pool in the north of the site ...... 12 Figure 8: Hardstanding/ footpaths through the site ...... 12 Figure 9: Modified neutral grassland/ marshy grassland mosaic with scattered trees along border of the site...... 13
APPENDICES APPENDIX A: Desk Based Ecological Appendix. APPENDIX B: Target Note Report. APPENDIX C: Bat and Bird Box Enhancement Opportunities
6150.001 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
DRAWINGS
Drawing 1 – G6150.002: Phase 1 Habitat Survey
6150.001 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Executive Summary 1. An ecological assessment of land off Matthews Lane (Nutsford Vale), Gorton, Manchester was understand to inform proposals for a secondary school and adjoining amenities. 2. The ecological assessment included a desktop study, a habitat walkover survey and a ground based assessment of the trees. 3. The site, currently used as a public park, comprises a mosaic of semi-natural broad- leaved woodland, scattered trees, modified neutral/ marshy grassland, scrub and ephemeral pool/ waterbodies. Such habitats provide a valuable resource for birds, mammals and invertebrates.
4. The following recommendations are made prior to the commencement of development;
Habitats: An updated Phase 1 habitat survey should be conducted within the optimum survey season in order to determine a comprehensive understanding of the diversity and species assemblage of the habitats on site. It is recommended this is conducted in May to cover both woodland and grassland optimal periods.
Amphibians/ Great crested newt: Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) assessment of existing waterbodies on site to be conducted in March. eDNA surveys are recommended on any suitable breeding waterbodies in April, with subsequent traditional surveys conducted if presence of GCN is determined (April - June).
Bat: Activity surveys are required to determine the species assemblage and level of bat activity across site as well as key habitats utilised (May- September).
Badger: If works do not commence on site within twelve months of the most recent survey date, a pre-commencement badger survey should be undertaken.
Birds: A breeding bird survey is required to determine presence/ absence of protected bird species. Nesting bird checks will be required prior to ground vegetation clearance works. Vegetation clearance should be undertaken outside of the period March to August inclusive to avoid disturbance to nesting birds.
5. Biodiversity enhancements opportunities are recommended and detailed within the recommendations section of this report.
6150.001 Page 2 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
1.0 Introduction 1.1 TEP were commissioned in December 2016 to carry out an ecological assessment of Nutsford Vale Park off Matthews Lane, Gorton, Manchester. This appraisal is to support development of a secondary school with associated car park and school ground on site. The school buildings will be focused predominantly within the southern section of the site.
1.2 This ecological assessment includes the following methods: Desktop study; Walkover habitat survey; and Ground based assessment of trees. 1.3 The objectives of this report are to: Describe the existing vegetation and give an overview of the habitats present on the site; Identify whether there are any features of conservation value such as legally protected species or habitats of biodiversity importance; Advise of further surveys or mitigation requirements that may be needed prior to development of the site; and Outline opportunities to provide biodiversity enhancement within site proposals.
6150.001 Page 3 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
2.0 Site Description 2.1 Nustsford Park lies off Matthews Lane in Gorton, Manchester. The survey area is shown in Figure 1. The approximate grid reference is SJ 87867 95039 2.2 The site, approximately 14ha in area, comprises a mosaic of woodland, scrub, ephemeral pools/ waterbodies and a mix of modified neutral/ marshy grassland. The site is currently used as public recreational space with a series of hardstanding footpaths throughout the site.
2.3 As an urban site, the area under development is predominantly surrounded by inner city housing and amenities. The southern site boundary lies along Matthew Lane; housing and schools are adjacent to the eastern boundary of the site; while the northern boundary links the site with additional green space to the north as well as more housing.
Figure 1: Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2016
6150.001 Page 4 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
3.0 Methods Desktop Study 3.1 Information regarding historic species records and protected sites within a 1km radius of the site was requested/gathered from the sources listed in Table 1.
Table 1: Ecological information and consultations.
CONSULTEE/SOURCE OF NATURE OF INFORMATION INFORMATION
Natural England, Magic Map: Multi- Online mapping system for England for Agency Geographic Information for the BAP habitats and protected sites. Countryside
Habitats and species of principal Section 41 NERC Act 2006 importance for the conservation of biodiversity.
Google Maps Satellite imagery
Greater Manchester Ecology Unit Identification of records for protected (GMEU) species within the local area.
Manchester City Council Local policies and land allocation.
Habitats and Flora Habitat Walkover Survey 3.2 A habitat walkover survey for Matthews Lane was undertaken by TEP ecologist Fleur Wilson (FISC Level 3), on 21st December 2016. The survey was carried out based on methods outlined by JNCC (2010) and CIEEM’s Guidelines for Preliminary Ecological Appraisal (2013), with habitat types and any incidental evidence of protected or invasive species noted. Limitations
3.3 The habitat survey was undertaken outside the optimum survey season of mid-April to end of September, therefore the diversity of some of the habitats on site may not be possible to determine. Fauna 3.4 During the extended Phase 1 habitat survey the habitats present were assessed for their potential to support species of conservation concern, particularly statutorily protected species or Species of principal importance under Section 41 of the Natural Environment and Communities Act 2006 (S41).
6150.001 Page 5 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Bat Tree Assessment 3.5 A ground based assessment of the trees, to determine their potential to support roosting bats, was completed in conjunction with the walkover survey in December 2016. This was done in accordance with the Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) Good Practice Guidelines (2016) for their potential to support roosting bats.
3.6 The following features in trees can potentially provide roosting opportunities for bats; Old woodpecker holes; Splits or rot holes in trunk, bough or large branches; Holes formed by two boughs or branches growing in contact; Loose or lifting bark; A covering of dense latticed creeper, usually ivy Hedera helix. 3.7 The criteria for roost assessment for trees and buildings are listed within Table 2 below.
Table 2: Bat Roost Assessment Criteria 2016.
Suitability Description of Roosting Habitat
No or exceptionally poor quality habitat features on site likely to be Negligible used by roosting bats.
A tree of sufficient size and age to contain PRFs but with none Low seen from the ground or features seen with only very limited roosting potential.
A tree with one or more potential roost sites that could be used by bats due to their size, shelter, protection, conditions and Moderate surrounding habitat but unlikely to support a roost of high conservation status.
A tree with one or more potential roost sites that are obviously suitable for use by larger numbers of bats on a more regular basis High and potentially for longer periods of time due to their size, shelter, protection, conditions and surrounding habitat.
6150.001 Page 6 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
4.0 Results Desktop Study 4.1 A summary of the desktop results are set out below. Detailed results of desktop information is presented in Appendix 1. It should be noted that an absence of records does not indicate the absence of protected species from the search area. However, our survey work has sought to identify the potential for any protected species. Designated Sites 4.2 The Local Nature Reserve (LNR) of Highfield Country Park lies approximately 900m south of the site; declared and managed for nature conservation. Connectivity to the LNR from the site is limited due to a railway and large extent of housing between the development and the Country Park.
4.3 The site lies within a SSSI Impact Risk Zone. Notable Habitats 4.4 Habitats of principal importance under Section 41 (S41) of the NERC Act (2006) occur within the 1km search area. Habitats 'Assumed Woodland' and 'Shrub' under the National Forest Inventory (GB) are present on the site. 4.5 The connected parcels of woodland, approximately 150m north of the site, are categorised as 'Deciduous Woodland' (Priority Habitat Inventory). There are other small pockets of this priority habitat (with portions of National Forest Inventory (GB) Broadleaved) scattered throughout the 1km search area from the site. These pockets of Deciduous Woodland are fairly isolated due to the built up nature of the area. 4.6 A small area of 'Mixed, mainly Conifer Woodland' (National Forest Inventory) lies along the 1km southern limit of the search area. Notable Species Records 4.7 There are a number of records of notable species within 1km of the site boundary; species include those listed under the following: European Protected Species (EPS); Schedule 1 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended (WCA1); Schedule 5 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended (WCA5); Schedule 9 of the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981, as amended (WCA9); Species of principal importance under Section 41 of the Natural Environment and Communities Act 2006 (S41); Protection of Badgers Act 1992 (PBA); Local Biodiversity Action Plan (LBAP); and Red and Amber listed Birds of Conservation Concern (BoCC) (BRd [RSBP]/ BAm [RSBP]).
6150.001 Page 7 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Amphibians 4.8 Records of great crested newt (GCN) Triturus cristatus (EPS), have been returned for Wingates Reservoir off Sandford Lane, approximately 600m south west of the site at the closest distance. 4.9 GCN surveys were conducted in 2015, approximately 200m west/ south west of the site at the closest distance, in an area north of Wingates Reservoir, west of Melland High School and adjacent to the housing estate south of Holmcroft Road. Desktop records show an absence of GCN from these surveys, 4.10 Common toad Bufo bufo is also recorded within the 1km search are. Mammals 4.11 There are records of mammal species within 1km of the site; Roosts of Daubenton's Myotis daubentonii and Pipistrelle Pipistrellus species have been recorded approximately 850m and 750m northwest of the site respectively; Pipistrelle Pipistrellus species recorded in three locations including on the northern border of the site at the closest distance; Daubenton's Bat Myotis daubentonii recorded approximately 500m southeast to the site at the closest distance; Whiskered Bat Myotis mystacinus recorded approximately 500m from the site at the closest distance; West European Hedgehog have been recorded on the northern boundary of the site. Birds
4.12 There are bird species recorded within 1km of the site. Records of birds listed on Section 41 of the NERC Act or Red and Amber listed Birds of Conservation Concern (BoCC) have been identified and summarised within Table 3.
Table 3: WCA1, S41 & BoCC bird records within search area
Common name Scientific name Designations Location
Dunnock Prunella modularis BAm, S41 c. 200m north of the site
House Sparrow Passer domesticus BRd , S41 On site
Lesser Redpoll Carduelis cabaret BRd, S41 c. 900m south of the site
Song Thrush Turdus philomelos BRd On site
Starling Sturnus vulgaris BRd , S41 On site
6150.001 Page 8 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Invertebrates 4.13 Two S41 invertebrates have been recorded locally; cinnabar moth Tyria jacobaeae and small heath Coenonympha pamphilus butterfly. The small heath butterfly has been recorded on site and the cinnabar just outside the site, along the western border. - associated with acid grassland - revised phase 1 recommended Other protected species 4.14 There are no records of badger, water vole, otter or reptiles within 1km of the site. Habitats and Flora 4.15 The results of the habitat survey are illustrated in Drawing 1 (G6150.002), with species list provided in the Target Note Report (Appendix 2). The following paragraphs provide a summary of the habitat survey. 4.16 The following habitats are present within, or adjoining the site;
Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland Modified neutral grassland1 Modified neutral grassland and marshy grassland mosaic Dense scrub Ephemeral Pools Scattered scrub Hard standing Species-poor hedge Scattered trees. Semi-natural broad-leaved woodland
4.17 Around 40% of the site comprises semi-natural broad-leaved woodland. The parcels of woodland across the site contain a large species diversity. Species include (although not exhaustive) hawthorn Crataegus momogyna, English oak Quercus robur, alder Alnus glutinosa, silver birch Betula pendula, sycamore Acer pseudoplantus, and beech Fagus sylvatica. No ground flora was noted at the time of the survey although regeneration is evident in the understory.
1 The neutral grassland categories detailed within the Phase 1 Habitat Survey Handbook are concentrated on grassland associated with rural situations (pastures and meadows), as such it was agreed with JNCC in 2005 (P. Gateley, pers. comm.) that neutral grassland habitats that don’t easily fit within these categories, usually within urban or industrial areas, can be referred to as modified neutral grassland –
‘Modified neutral grassland is not derived from agricultural grassland and the terms semi-improved and improved do not apply. Some modified neutral grassland may be species-rich but many swards are dense, coarse and species-poor. Modified neutral grassland naturally regenerates on disturbed ground and is unmanaged. It most commonly occurs in urban areas and on post-industrial land’.
6150.001 Page 9 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
4.18 Overall, the semi-natural broad-leaved woodland contains a mix of regenerated tree species, under 100 years of age. Within approximately half of the woodland parcels, there are occasional occurrences of planted specimens of Scots pine Pinus sylvestris, particularly in the south of the site. However, due to the nature of the woodland as a whole, this habitat is categorised as semi-natural broad-leaved woodland as opposed to mixed woodland.
Figure 2: Woodland parcel in the south of the site; semi-natural broad-leaved woodland. This habitat on site is dominated by regenerated broad-leaved trees with occasional occurrences of planted coniferous specimens.
Modified neutral grassland 4.19 Approximately 50% of the site comprises of grassland. The grassland is largely classed as modified neutral grassland; a habitat that typically occurs in urban areas such as the site under development. The modified neutral grassland is mainly fairly dense and coarse in character with frequent grass species such as cock-foot Dactylis glomerata, Yorkshire-fog Holcus lanatus and creeping bent Agrostis solonifera. Marshy grassland
4.20 In areas of wetter ground, the grassland habitat becomes dominated by rush Juncus species. With Juncus species covering over 25% of the vegetation, these communities on site are classed as marsh/ marshy grassland. Reed canary-grass Phalaris arundinace and pendulous sedge Carex Pendula are also present within the marshy grassland areas.
6150.001 Page 10 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Figure 3: Modified neutral grassland/ marshy grassland mosaic, with scattered scrub.
Dense continuous scrub and scattered scrub
4.21 Roughly 10% of the site comprises of dense scrub. The scrub sections contain a variety of woody species and mainly consist of young, small regeneration. Regenerated specimens within these scrub sections mainly include alder Alunus spinosa, ash Fraxinus excelsior, cherry Prunus sp. and goat willow Salix caprea. 4.22 A large stand of dogwood Cornus sanguinea dominates the eastern boundary of the site, with recently established goat willow Salix caprea and alder Alnus glutinosa present within the south of the eastern border.
4.23 There is also a large stands of scrub near the southern boundary, adjacent to the screen of poplar trees. This is a dense thicket of blackthorn with occasional regeneration. 4.24 Throughout the grassland habitat lies young regeneration. This has been classified and mapped as scattered scrub. Ephemeral Pools/ waterbodies
4.25 There are a number of depressions dotted across the site which at the time of survey contained water. The shallow nature of some of these pools indicate they are ephemeral. Within the north east area of the site, the pools are deeper with established aquatic vegetation. These pools have been categorised as waterbodies, and indicated as so on the habitat drawing.
6150.001 Page 11 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Figure 4: Ephemeral pools in the south of the Figure 5: Waterbody in the north of the site site
Figure 6: Waterbody in the woodland in the Figure 7: Ephemeral pool in the north of the west of the site site
Hard standing
4.26 Footpaths link though the site, providing a small proportion of hard standing.
Figure 8: Hardstanding/ footpaths through the site
6150.001 Page 12 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Scattered trees 4.27 There are a number of scattered trees across the site that are not enclosed within the woodland sections. Of particular note are the line of trees along the southern boundary. Predominately black poplar Populus nigra, these trees are typically tall, narrow, grown close together and provide a screen to Matthews Lane.
Figure 9: Modified neutral grassland/ marshy grassland mosaic with scattered trees along border of the site.
Invasive and Protected Species
4.28 There are no invasive or protected plant species (listed on Schedule 9 or Schedule 8 of the Wildlife & Countryside Act) on site. Connectivity with the wider landscape 4.29 Situated in the urban sprawl of Manchester City, the surrounding landscape is predominantly buildings and roads, providing limited connectivity for wildlife. However, the mosaic of woodland, grassland, scrub and treelines are linked to a small parcel of similar habitat north of the site. The woodland parcels and tree lines within the site provide potential flight routes and foraging areas for bats in the vicinity; linking the site to clusters of buildings, tree-screened railways, playing fields and subsequently Audenshaw Reservoirs and Gorton Reservoir with surrounding green space.
6150.001 Page 13 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Fauna Amphibians
4.30 There are also a number of waterbodies distributed across the site, which could provide suitable breeding habitat for amphibians. Some of these waterbodies are considered to be ephemeral pools which will dry during peak breeding season, while others are deemed to be of suitable size with adequate aquatic vegetation to support amphibians. The areas of woodland and scrub on site also afford ideal terrestrial habitat for amphibians; tree roots in particular and the presence of fallen trees within the woodland provide ideal shelter for hibernation. Bats 4.31 Within the site boundary, there are no trees with features suitable to support roosting bats. Based on the BCT Guidelines these trees are categorised as offering negligible potential. There are no other features on site that could offer roosting potential. 4.32 The screen of trees bordering the site (particularly the southern boundary of predominantly poplar trees), and woodland parcels on site offer suitable habitat for foraging and commuting bats present in the surrounding area.
Badger 4.33 While the habitats on site provide suitable conditions for badger foraging and sett creation, no evidence of badger such as setts, latrines etc. were identified during the site survey.
Birds 4.34 The existing woodland and modified neutral grassland/ marshy grassland on site has potential to support a number of bird species for breeding and/ or foraging in summer. The woodland edge and scrub in particular provide ideal habitat for species such as linnet, yellow hammer, lesser redpoll, dunnock, starling, song thrush, bullfinch and mistle thrush. The wetter areas within the site also provide suitable habitat for reed bunting.
4.35 The broad-leaved woodland and scattered scrub will also support a range of species for breeding, shelter and foraging throughout the year.
Reptiles 4.36 No reptiles were seen during the walkover of the site. The ephemeral pools and woodland/ scrub edges provide some limited potential for foraging and refuge for reptiles. However, the site is regularly disturbed with little to no areas to provide basking opportunities. Therefore the overall habitat is sub-optimal to support reptiles. Water vole/ otter
4.37 There are no ditches or watercourses within the site and therefore no suitable habitat to support water vole or otter. A drain/ ditch is present around 150m east of the site, however this culverts before the site and the road prevents any connectivity.
6150.001 Page 14 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Invertebrates 4.38 Due to the time of the survey, a comprehensive list of flora present and full diversity of habitats could not be determined. However, it is likely that the marshy grassland holds a decent assemblage of nectar producing plants that have the potential to support a diverse invertebrate population. Therefore plant feeding species are likely to be present, such as grasshoppers, butterflies and crickets.
6150.001 Page 15 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
5.0 Conclusion 5.1 This section will conclude the potential impacts on the ecological receptors of the proposed scheme, although this is not based on any detailed proposals at this stage. Designations 5.2 The Local Nature Reserve of Highfield Country Park is not within influencing distance from the development site and will not be impacted by the current proposals.
5.3 The site lies within a SSSI Impact Risk Zone. Natural England's Impact Risk Zones for Sites of Special Scientific Interest guidance states where consultation with Natural England for further advice is required. For the type of works proposed at the Matthews Lane site and the distance away from the designated site, no consultation with Natural England is required.
5.4 Natural England's online mapping system identifies the S41 habitats of 'assumed woodland' and 'shrub' present on site. The walkover habitat survey identified these areas are semi-natural broad-leaved woodland. Development could results in the loss of S41 woodland habitat in order to facilitate the construction works. Fauna Amphibians
5.5 The presence of GCN has been recorded at Wingates Reservoir located 600m to the south of the site. The terrestrial habitat linking the reservoir to the site is fairly poor; a defunct hedgerow, playing field, and ditch connect to the site, however a B-road bordering the site provides a barrier to amphibian movement. 5.6 While the site is fairly isolated, it comprises both suitable breeding and hibernating habitat and is of reasonable size to support a population of GCN. The pools focused to the south of the site are fairly shallow and likely to be ephemeral, typically drying during peak breeding season. However, at the time of the survey (December 2016) there were some waterbodies of sufficient size with adequate aquatic vegetation to support amphibians.
5.7 Further surveys will be required to establish the suitability of these waterbodies to support GCN during breeding season and if necessary subsequent surveys to conclude presence/ absence of the species. Bats
5.8 There are no features that offer suitable bat roosting habitat on site, with the results of the ground based tree assessment determining all on site trees to have negligible potential. There are therefore no implications to the development with regard to roosting bats. 5.9 Records indicate the presence of bat roosts (Daubenton's and Pipistrelle species around 800m from the site) and activity/ presence of at least three bat species within the local area. The areas of woodland, scrub and tree lines within the site are considered to provide suitable foraging habitat for bats, with moderate commuting habitat linking the site to green space and reservoirs further afield. 6150.001 Page 16 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Badger 5.10 No badger records are returned within 1km of the site. The modified neutral grassland/marshy grassland mosaic habitat provide some potential foraging habitat for badger and the broad leaved woodland areas, also within the site, provide potential for sett creation habitat.
5.11 No evidence of badger was noted on or immediately adjacent to the site during the survey, therefore there are currently no implications to the development with regard to badgers. However, badgers are mobile creatures and due to site providing potential habitat for this species, they may subsequently populate these habitats. Birds 5.12 The existing woodland, scrub and long grass on site provide potential to support a number of red and amber listed birds of conservation concern (BoCC). Further surveys are required in order to determine which species are utilising the site. 5.13 The broad-leaved woodland, scattered trees and scrub will support a range of bird species for nesting. All nesting birds are protected under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981 (as amended). There is no provision under the licensing system to allow disturbance or destruction of nests to facilitate development, so there are implications for the timing of any vegetation clearance works, with regard to nesting birds. Reptiles 5.14 There are no local records of reptiles and the habitats on site are sub-optimal with very limited connectivity to favourable habitats further afield. Therefore there are no implications to the development with regard to reptiles. Water vole/ otter 5.15 There are no records of water vole and otter or suitable habitat on site to support either species. There are therefore no implications to the development with regard to either species. Invertebrates 5.16 Small heath butterfly has been recorded on site. As an S41 species, conservation of their supporting habitat should be considered in development. Small heath butterfly favours species-rich grassland/ marshy grassland where they can utilise the nectar source.
6150.001 Page 17 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
6.0 Recommendations 6.1 Prior to development, some potential ecological constraints require further consideration so as to ensure that development does not result in either an offence being committed in respect of protected species or a net loss of biodiversity interest. The NERC Act imposes a duty upon Local Planning Authorities to seek biodiversity enhancement through development and this duty is transposed through planning policy. Therefore measures that can be conducted to enhance ecological features within the site are recommended to comply with current legislation and policy. Habitats 6.2 In order to ensure development does not have a negative impact upon the S41 broad- leaved woodland habitat, it is recommended that the habitat is retained as much as possible within the proposals. Where retention of the woodland cannot be achieved replacement planting will be required as mitigation. 6.3 The habitat survey was undertaken outside the optimum survey season. Due to the size and complexity of habitats on site, a Phase 1 survey is recommended during the appropriate season (mid-April to end of September) in order to determine the diversity of the woodland and grassland present on site. This will provide a comprehensive species list and confirm the presence of any significant habitats that need to be taken into account when determining the impact of the development. Fauna Amphibians
6.4 Based on the depth and lack of terrestrial vegetation at the bottom of some of the waterbodies on site, it is possible they hold water year round and as such afford suitable breeding habitat for amphibians. It is recommended a repeat survey with a Habitat Suitability Index (HSI) assessment, is conducted in March in order to establish if the waterbodies present maintain water during the newt breeding season (mid- March to end of June). 6.5 Any waterbodies still present during the breeding season and deemed suitable to support a GCN population will require further amphibian surveys to determine presence/ absence. It is recommended that eDNA surveys are conducted to confirm this. This survey can be conducted between Mid-April and June, however, in the instance of this development project it is recommended this is done in Mid-April to provide a quick turnaround of results. 6.6 Should GCN be found to be present from the eDNA survey, further population class surveys will be required (March and June). Should GCN be found present, a licence maybe required from Natural England and suitable mitigation implemented.
Bats 6.7 Bat activity surveys are recommended to determine the bat activity level and species assemblage across the site. This will provide an understanding of the key foraging and commuting habitats for bats and in turn support any mitigation plans. Bat activity surveys must be conducted between May-September.
6150.001 Page 18 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
Badgers 6.8 If development of the site does not commence within twelve months of the most recent survey date (December 2016), a pre-construction check to ensure that badgers have not moved into the site or adjacent habitats in the intervening period is recommended.
Birds 6.9 There is a need to identify whether any ground nesting bird species currently utilise the site for breeding in order to determine the potential impacts of development and mitigation requirements; therefore, a Breeding Bird Survey (BBS) is required. A BBS survey requires three visits across the period April to June (one visit per month). 6.10 Any vegetation clearance should avoid breeding bird season; March - August inclusive. If works are required during the nesting season, a suitably qualifies ecologist should be present on site 24 hours prior to clearance in order to ensure that no nesting birds are present.
6.11 If nesting birds are found to be present an exclusion zone will need to be set up and works delayed until nesting is completed (i.e. until young have fledges). The ecologist will regularly monitor the nest and advice the contracts when works can proceed. Invertebrates
6.12 The updated Phase 1 habitat survey will identify any areas of particular species-rich grassland/ marshy grassland that have the potential to support a diverse invertebrate population including the small heath butterfly. Following the results of the habitat survey the potential impact on invertebrates should be assessed. Enhancement opportunities 6.13 There is potential to diversity and enhance some of the site's habitats within future development plans of the secondary school. To mitigate for the loss of any aquatic habitat ponds could be created within the green buffer that will be maintained along the north and eastern side of the site. Adding permanent waterbodies into the landscape design will provide habitat and refuge for a range of freshwater species, including common toad which have been recorded within the 1km search area. 6.14 Efforts should be made to maintain as much of the woodland, broad-leaved trees and scrub on site as possible, which provides nesting, foraging and commuting opportunities for local bird and small mammal populations.
6.15 Where woodland and scrub retention is not possible, new native hedgerows, including native species of local provenance, should be included in the final design. This will mitigate for the loss of any scrub offer similar opportunities for local wildlife.
6150.001 Page 19 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
6.16 Enhancement opportunities for bats and birds can be provided through the provision of bat and bird boxes to provide roosting and nesting opportunities onsite. These can be provided on retained trees or incorporated into any development proposals. Examples of suitable bat and bird boxes are provided in Appendix C. Starling, song thrush and house sparrow have been recorded locally and therefore bird boxes suitable for these species should be considered; e.g. Schwegler Brick Nest Boxes, 3S Schwegler Starling Nest Box, 1SP Schwegler Sparrow Terrace. 6.17 Records of hedgehog have been identified on the site. Hedgehog are a declining species and as such the inclusion of hedgehog gates should be considered to maintain commuting potential across the site. Based on the size of site and current features, it is recommended that at least 5 hedgehog boxes could also be included within the grounds of the school.
6150.001 Page 20 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
References Chartered Institue of Ecology and Environmental Management. Guidelines for Preliminary Ecological Appraisal. (CIEEM http://www.cieem.net/), 2013. Collins, J. Bat Surveys for Professional Ecologists: Good Practice Guidelines, 3rd Edition. Bat Conservation Trust, 2016. Committee, Joint Nature Conservation. Handbook for Phase 1 Habitat Surveys - A technique for environmental audit. Peterborough, 2010. Dean, M., Strachan, R., Gow, D. and Andrews, R. The Water Vole Mitigation Handbook (The Mammal Society Mitigation Guidance Series). The Mammal Society, London, 2016.
6150.001 Page 21 January 2017 Version 1.0
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
APPENDIX A: Desk Based Ecological Appendix.
6150.001 Appendices January 2017 Version 1.0
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Assessment Matthews Lane, Gorton Approximate Central Grid Reference: SJ 87867 95039
Contents
Site location plan
Extract from local plan
Extracts of relevant planning policies
Local site designations
Local species records
National site designations
Habitat inventory records
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Site location plan
Site boundary: approximate central grid reference SJ 87867 95039
Contains Ordnance Survey data © Crown copyright and database right 2016
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Extract of Manchester City Council Core Strategy Policies map (adopted July 2012) and supporting key
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Extracts of relevant planning policies and supplementary planning guidance
Policy EN 1 Design Principles and Strategic Character Areas All development in Manchester will be expected to follow the seven principles of urban design, as identified in national planning guidance and listed above and have regard to the strategic character area in which the development is located. Opportunities for good design to enhance the overall image of the City should be fully realised, particularly on major radial and orbital road and rail routes. Design and Access Statements submitted with proposals for new development must clearly detail how the proposed development addresses the design principles, reinforces and enhances the local character of that part of the City and supports the achievement of the Core Strategy Strategic Objectives. 1. City Centre Character Area The City Centre contains a rich legacy which reflects its urban evolution to the current day and includes listed buildings, conservation areas, archaeological remains and an historic street pattern. Its core area presents a particularly dense environment that accommodates a wide and closely integrated range of uses including commercial, civic and residential activities. Relative to the amount of development there is limited open space and this includes a range of civic and less formal green spaces and waterways. Outside the core and associated with the Inner Relief Route there are less active and less densely developed areas with significant elements of cleared land. The City Centre is the focus of the City's transport routes. Developers will be expected to consider the City's heritage and continue the rich pattern of activity in the core area. While there will be opportunities to create landmark buildings, developments should also contribute positively to the experience of all at street level. Wherever possible the opportunity should be realised to enhance existing and provide new areas of meaningful open space, and the maintenance and improvement of the City's permeability should be considered in all proposals. 2. The Corridor (Higher Education Precinct (HEP)) Character Area This area contains major educational and medical institutions located alongside a linear route in a variety of large scale buildings. Underlying this are remnants of the historic past such as the grid iron street pattern dating principally from the 19th Century. The area contains a network of open spaces often resulting from more recent developments and is busy especially with public transport and pedestrian movement through much of the 24 hour day with patterns of movement linking areas to both sides of Oxford Road. The Corridor represents the only area where the levels of activity, range of uses and scale of built form associated with the City Centre extend beyond the Mancunian Way. New development needs to reflect the significant scale and form expected from major City institutions and opportunities will exist for more innovative and contemporary built forms, which have regard to the historic context. A balance between built form and open space which allows for easy movement through and across the area will be required. 3. Heaton Park Character Area
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Heaton Park is a large, historic, Grade II listed Municipal Park, containing a number of historic structures dating from its original use as a country estate. It is used for a mix of formal and informal recreational opportunities in a primarily informal landscape. It is the highest point in the City. A continuation of its historic landscape character as parkland with informal groups of trees, to enable the accommodation of the existing range of leisure activities, is expected. 4. Northern Character Area The character of this area is significantly affected by the topography, with a marked increase in height moving northwards, cut by the River Irk and its tributaries. There is a finer grained, predominantly residential mix of development, broken up by open spaces and significant tree cover also linked to the local topography. Developers should respond to the underlying topography and varied townscape created by the balance between built form and the tree-covered landscape. 5. Irk Valley Character Area A tree-filled river valley, steeply cut in parts, used as informal open space. This river valley is bounded by and still contains many areas of low density residential and industrial activity with occasional formal open spaces. Its green character stops abruptly at Dantzic Street/Dalton Street where its character becomes more like that of the City Centre. Development within or alongside the valley sides should also seek to enhance the valley's semi-natural appearance and function. Views into, out of and along the valley are to be considered. 6. Central Arc Character Area The character of the area we have today is predominantly one of 1960’s social housing estates and zoned industrial areas bisected by the transport network and largely resulting from the comprehensive redevelopment of the past. Significant areas of employment are found where this area overlaps with the fringe of the City Centre such as at Strangeways which is a large, distinctive, entirely industrial area suitable for further employment growth. Much of the Central Arc is experiencing regeneration with some contemporary urban solutions, for example in Hulme, now complete, and some still to be progressed. The opportunity exists for development on a large scale using innovative urban design solutions. These should use District Centres and key nodes of public transport as focal points and involve existing communities. The opportunity should also be taken to use the canals to create a distinctive urban environment and enhance access through the City. 7. Medlock Valley(outside the City Centre) Character Area This is divided into three sub groups, with a wider semi-natural area lying to the east of Bankbridge Road, a more managed landscape with an increase in urban form around Eastlands and Philips Park and a narrower river valley confined by built development to the west of Eastlands. Development will need to respond to the particular attributes of the valley's changing character. Development adjacent to the valley sides must not diminish the degree of openness or accessibility in any particular sub area. 8. Southern Character Area
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
There is a notable presence of older development (1750-early 1900) at key junctions and along historic radial routes such as Oxford Road/Wilmslow Road, often but not exclusively associated with District Centres. The largely flat terrain has enabled the subsequent infilling of land between these routes with a more regular layout of predominantly residential development up to the 1960s. Much of this subsequent development was associated with the purpose built radial parkways, serving the City Centre. Princess Parkway now forms the principal road link between the City Centre and the Airport. The area contains pockets of formal open space including some significant historic parks. New development needs to retain the identity and focus of activity associated with the historic District Centres. Where appropriate development along the radial routes such as Princess Parkway should be commensurate in scale with the prominence of its location. 9. Mersey Valley Character Area This is a wide, flat valley with heavily managed open space and tree cover largely found on the valley perimeter where there are localised significant changes in level. The Mersey Valley acts as a important visual break between the South Area and Wythenshawe Environs. Extensive long range views exist from the valley sides and the major road network which bisects and runs along the valley. Developers will need to ensure that any development within or to the periphery of the valley maintains the sense of openness and accessibility. 10. Wider Wythenshawe Character Area Wythenshawe was developed along the principles of the 'garden city' movement. The wider area represents a phased series of predominantly social housing dating from the 1920s to the 1960s, with some later infill developments and industrial zones. There is a predominance of low rise, low density semi-detached houses, short terraces and low rise blocks of flats and maisonettes, all set within private gardens, incidental open space, public amenity spaces and pockets of semi-natural and woodland areas. The key focal points for activity are the transport corridors, hospital and District Centres. The principal features to be retained in any new development is the sense of the existing low rise suburban character set within soft landscape. 11. Airport & urban fringe Character Area Much of this area is open in character including a significant area of agricultural land. Built development is mainly associated with the Airport and associated uses, often large scale but height limited by flight path requirements. Other built development is small scale and takes the form of individual or small clusters of houses. Development in this area needs to accommodate the future operational needs of the Airport, whilst retaining the area’s open character as far as is possible.
Policy EN 3 Heritage Throughout the City, the Council will encourage development that complements and takes advantage of the distinct historic and heritage features of its districts and neighbourhoods, including those of the City Centre. New developments must be designed so as to support the Council in preserving or, where possible, enhancing the historic environment, the character, setting and
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
accessibility of areas and buildings of acknowledged importance, including scheduled ancient monuments, listed buildings, registered parks and gardens, conservation areas and archaeological remains. Proposals which enable the re-use of heritage assets will be encouraged where they are considered consistent with the significance of the heritage asset.
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Map provided by Greater Manchester Ecology Unit of site designations and protected species within 1km
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Map of Bat species data provided by Greater Manchester Ecology Unit within 1km
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Map of NERC Act S41 species data provided by Greater Manchester Ecology Unit within 1km
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
Extract of species data provided by Greater Manchester Ecology Unit within 1km
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
MAGIC Map 1km search zone for designated wildlife sites - Map
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
MAGIC Map 1km search zone for designated wildlife sites - Report
Local Nature Reserves (England) Reference 1457141 Name HIGHFIELD COUNTRY PARK Hectares 28.58 Hyperlink http://www.lnr.naturalengland.org.uk/special/lnr/lnr_details.asp?themeid=1457141
MAGIC Map search for SSSI Impact Risk Zones for site only
SSSI Impact Risk Zones – to assess planning applications for likely impacts on SSSIs/SACs/SPAs & Ramsar sites (England) 1. DOES PLANNING PROPOSAL FALL INTO ONE OR MORE OF THE CATEGORIES BELOW? 2. IF YES, CHECK THE CORRESPONDING DESCRIPTION(S) BELOW. LPA SHOULD CONSULT NATURAL ENGLAND ON LIKELY RISKS FROM THE FOLLOWING: All Planning Applications Infrastructure Wind & Solar Energy Minerals, Oil & Gas Rural Non Residential Residential Rural Residential Air Pollution Pig & poultry units, slurry lagoons > 4000m³ Combustion General combustion processes >50MW energy input. Incl: energy from waste incineration, other incineration, landfill gas generation plant, pyrolysis/gasification, anaerobic digestion, sewage treatment works, other incineration/ combustion. Waste Composting Discharges Water Supply GUIDANCE – How to use the Impact Risk Zones /Metadata_for_magic/SSSI IRZ User Guidance MAGIC.pdf
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix
Desk Based Ecology Appendix
MAGIC Map 1km search zone for habitat inventory data
6150.001 Desk Based Appendix Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
APPENDIX B: Target Note Report.
6150.001 Appendices January 2017 Version 1.0
Target Notes Report – Matthews Lane
KEY - D = Dominant, A = Abundant, F = Frequent, O = Occasional, R = Rare Target Note 1 (TN1) Grassland within Park is a mosaic of modified neutral grassland with sections of marshy grassland. Within the marshy grassland areas Juncus species become more dominant. Target note encompasses grassland species across the whole of the site. Agrostis stolonifera Creeping Bent F Chamerion angustifolium Rosebay Willowherb F Dactylis glomerata Cock's-foot F Dipsacus fullonum Teasel F Festuca rubra Red Fescue F Holcus lanatus Yorkshire-fog F Juncus effusus Soft Rush F Juncus inflexus Hard Rush F Phalaris arundinacea Reed Canary-grass F Ranunculus repens Creeping Buttercup F Alopecurus pratensis Meadow Foxtail O Arrhenatherum elatius False Oat-grass O Carex pendula Pendulous Sedge O Deschampsia cespitosa Tufted Hair-grass O Juncus articulatus Jointed Rush O Lotus corniculatus Bird's-foot Trefoil O Phleum pratense Timothy O Plantago lanceolata Ribwort Plantain O Ranunculus acris Meadow Buttercup O Rumex obtusifolius Broad-leaved Dock O Stachys sylvatica Hedge Woundwort O Taraxacum officinale agg. Dandelion O Trifolium repens White Clover O Vicia sp. Vetch species O Geum urbanum Wood Avens R Potentilla anserina Silverweed R Rubus fruticosus agg. Bramble R Trifolium pratense Red Clover R Target Note 2 (TN2) Dense scrub - large stand of Dogwood Cornus sanguinea Dogwood D Target Note 3 (TN3) Screen of scattered trees along southern boundary Populus nigra Black Poplar agg. D Populus tremula Aspen F Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore O Fraxinus excelsior Ash O Acer platanoides Norway Maple R Target Note 4 (TN4) Scrub is dominated by small, young, recently established woody species Cornus sanguinea Dogwood A Salix caprea Goat Willow F Alnus glutinosa Alder O Target Note 5 (TN5) Dense thicket of blackthorn to the south of the site Prunus spinosa Blackthorn D Alnus glutinosa Alder O Fraxinus excelsior Ash O Prunus sp. Cherry species O Salix caprea Goat Willow O
Target Note 6 (TN6) Dense area of woodland trees of large species diversity. Southern section of woodland parcel is wetter and the trees are more densely packed. Crataegus monogyna Hawthorn F Quercus robur English Oak F Quercus rubra Red Oak F Alnus glutinosa Alder O Betula pendula Silver Birch O Larix decidua European Larch O Malus pumila Apple O Pinus sylvestris Scots Pine O Prunus spinosa Blackthorn O Quercus cerris Turkey Oak O Salix fragilis Crack Willow O Acer pseudoplatanus Sycamore R Fagus sylvatica Beech R
Target Note 7 (TN7) Young small regeneration of trees Fraxinus excelsior Ash O Prunus avium Wild Cherry O Quercus robur English Oak O Sorbus aucuparia Rowan O
Target Note 8 (TN8) Dense stand of hawthorn Crataegus monogyna Hawthorn
Target Note 9 (TN9) Large dense group of broad-leaved trees Significant areas of regeneration on the understory Quercus robur English Oak A Betula pendula Silver Birch F Fraxinus excelsior Ash F Prunus avium Wild Cherry F Quercus cerris Turkey Oak F Cornus sanguinea Dogwood O Ilex aquifolium Holly O Populus alba White Poplar O Populus tremula Aspen O
Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
APPENDIX C: Bat and Bird Box Enhancement Opportunities
6150.001 Appendices January 2017 Version 1.0
Examples of Habitat Enhancement Measures for Bats and Birds
Bats
1FR/2FR Schwegler Bat Tubes The 1FR Bat Tube is designed to be installed on the external walls of buildings, either flush or beneath a rendered surface. This makes it ideal for situations where you wish the box to be discrete as only the entrance hole will be visible. It can also be painted to match your building with an air permeable paint if desired.
The 1FR is specifically designed to meet the characteristic behavioural requirements of the types of bats that inhabit buildings. It has an integrated wooden panel onto which bats can cling and a ridged entrance slope which makes it easy for them to enter and leave the box safely. The design maintains excellent climatic conditions inside providing bats with a safe and stable environment in which to roost and it requires no maintenance because droppings fall out of the entrance ramp. To allow access into existing cavities in buildings use the 2FR Bat Tube.
Ibstock Enclosed Bat Box The Enclosed Bat Box 'C' from Ibstock is designed for the pipstrelle bat. It is ideal for new builds as it can be integrated directly into the brickwork to produce a discrete but attractive home for bats.
The inside of the box is designed to create several roosting zones which are ideal for crevice dwelling bats such as the pipistrelle. The bottom entrance means that no maintenance is required as dropping simply fall out the bottom.
This box is available in two sizes in smooth red, smooth blue or smooth gold brick and has an attractive bat motive on the front. This box is durable and fully frost resistant.
Dimensions: Small Box - 215 x 215mm, Large Box - 215 x 290mm.
2F Schwegler Bat Box The 2F is the standard and most popular bat box and is ideal as a starter box to see if there are bats in your area or to provide much needed secure roosting space. It has been designed as a summer roosting space for bats and has a simple entrance hole at the front. The Schwegler 2F has a removable front panel and can be converted in to a bird nest box using a replacement 1B front panel if there is no evidence of bat activity after a couple of years. The 2F is manufactured from long-lasting Woodcrete, which is a blend of wood, concrete and clay which will not rot, leak, crack or warp, and will last for at least 20 - 25 years, making it suitable for long-term mitigation projects. Woodcrete is breathable and maintains a stable temperature inside the box and the 2F is painted black to absorb warmth. It also provides a good rough surface for bats to cling on to and climb.
The 2F bat box can be sited in trees or on buildings and is best positioned at a height of between 3 to 6 metres. Bat boxes should ideally be sited in open sunny positions and in groups of 3 to 5 boxes facing different directions to provide a variety of micro-habitats. Please note that once bats have inhabited a roost site they may only be disturbed by licensed bat workers.
Birds
3S Schwegler Starling Nest Box Starlings are often seen as a problem at certain times of the year and in particular regions. They are highly adaptable, feed in flocks and can soon use up readily available sources of food. However, we should not forget the ecological benefits that they provide as an important and natural form of pest control. For example, they limit the numbers of crane flies, green oak leaf rollers and gypsy moths.
The Schwegler 3S Starling nest box has become established as the standard design both in the UK and Europe. Not only will the 3S nest box attract starlings, it is just as likely to provide overnight shelter for great spotted, middle spotted and lesser spotted woodpeckers. When there are fewer starlings, other species such as pied flycatchers and nuthatches may breed in these boxes. Because of the relatively large entrance hole (45mm diameter), the interior is well lit which encourages occupation. The large diameter nesting chamber (140mm) also helps to encourage occupation.
Schwegler Brick Nest Boxes This range of brick nest boxes follows a highly successful design that has evolved over 40 years since Schwegler first started producing brick nest boxes for incorporation in buildings. The box dimensions correspond to those of standard, commercially available bricks used in modern European construction. These dimensions allow for a 1cm layer of mortar enabling the nesting blocks to be inserted in any wall without the need to cut adjoining bricks. The box can be installed flush with the outside wall and can be rendered or covered so that only the entrance hole is visible.
The interior of the box resembles a natural woodpecker hole, with the same shallow, oval depression in the floor. The box is manufactured from virtually the same material as Schwegler's tried and tested wood-concrete; an exceedingly durable, rot-proof and breathable natural material designed to mimic the properties of natural nest sites. Three designs of brick nest box are available.
Type 24 Features an upright box with removeable entrance hole at the top. With an entrance hole diameter of 32mm, this box is suitable for many small birds including great, blue, marsh, coal and crested tits, redstarts, nuthatch, tree and house sparrows. Dimensions: height 23.5cm, width 18cm, depth = 18cm. Weight = approx. 7.3kg.
Type 25 Features a wide box with removeable entrance hole at the right-hand side. With an entrance hole of 55 x 33mm this is the ideal box for attracting swifts. Dimensions: height 18cm, width 26.5cm, depth 22cm. Weight = approx. 8.8 kg.
Type 26 Features an upright box with large open front. With a large open hole (110 x 80mm), this box will attract species that use open-fronted nest boxes, such as redstart, pied wagtail, spotted flycatchers and sometimes robin. Dimensions: height 98cm, width 18cm, depth 18cm. Weight = approx. 5.4kg
1SP Schwegler Sparrow Terrace The Sparrow Terrace has been designed to help redress the balance of falling house sparrow numbers. The current UK population of 6 million pairs is half what it was in 1980 and this is thought to be due to habitat destruction and lack of suitable nesting spaces. Sparrows are social birds and like to nest in company. This terrace provides ideal nesting opportunities for three families. Made of Schwegler's revolutionary wood- concrete mix, this terrace is durable, breathable and will last many decades. It may also occasionally attract tits, redstarts and spotted flycatchers.
The terrace can be fixed on to the surface of a suitable wall or incorporated into the wall. It is suitable for all types of houses in built-up areas, and on industrial and agricultural buildings such as barns, sheds and factories. Due to its weight (15kg), it is not suitable for fences or garden sheds. Ideally place the terrace two metres or more above the ground. Either install on the surface of the wall using the plugs and screws provided, or install directly into the wall (see the images tab for illustrations). Cleaning is advisable but not necessary. The front panel can be removed by turning the screw hook. The Sparrow Terrace is available in either Stone or Brown Matthews Lane Gorton, Manchester Ecological Assessment
DRAWING Drawing 1 – G6150.002: Phase 1 Habitat Survey
6150.001 Drawings January 2017 Version 1.0
KEY
! ! !! ! ! ! ! Survey Boundary ! ! ! ! Target Notes !!! H !!!! LONGSIGHT ROAD E Scattered Scrub !!! ! ! E ! !! ! Scattered Broad-leaved Trees ! ! ! ! !! E !! ! ! Scattered Coniferous Trees ! ! ! ! Species-poor Intact Hedge ! ! E Fence ! ! E Semi-natural Broad-leaved Woodland ! Dense/Continuous Scrub E E E MMMMGGGG E E E E Modified Neutral Grassland E MMMMGGGG ! E E E E Marsh/Marshy Grassland E E E Tall Ruderal E TN2 TN1 E H Ephemeral Pool H E E E Standing Water E ! E E E E Hardstanding
! Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of Her Majesty's ! Stationery Office. Contains OS data © Crown Copyright and database right 2017. All rights reserved. Base mapping provided by client Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community ! TN9 Site Map H
!
! ! ! ! TN6 H ! ! E ! ! E E ! E E ! E 1:20,000 ! ! ! E E ! ! E ! ! TN4 !H ! Rev Description Drawn Approved Date TN8 ! ! E H ! ! ! E TN5 ! H TN7 Genesis Centre, Birchwood Science Park, Warrington WA3 7BH Tel 01925 844004 e-mail [email protected] www.tep.uk.com ! H ! ! ! Project ! ! Matthews Lane, Gorton ! ! ! ! TN3 ! ! ! ! H Title ! ! Phase 1 Habitat Survey ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! MATTHEWS LANE Drawing Number ! ! G6150.002 ! ! ! ! Metres Drawn Checked Approved Scale Date 0 25 50 100 RE JS EP 1:2,000 @ A3 13/01/2017
HEAD OFFICE MARKET GATESHEAD LONDON CORNWALL HARBOROUGH
Genesis Centre, Harborough Innovation Office 26, Gateshead 8 Trinity Street, 4 Park Noweth, Birchwood Science Park, Centre, International Business London, Churchtown, Warrington Airfield Business Park, Centre, SE1 1DB Cury, WA3 7BH Leicester Road, Mulgrave Terrace, Helston Market Harborough Gateshead Cornwall Leicestershire NE8 1AN TR12 7BW LE16 7WB
Tel: 01925 844004 Tel: 01858 383120 Tel: 0191 605 3340 Tel: 020 3096 6050 Tel: 01326 240081 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected]