DOCSLIB.ORG

Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Greater Manchester Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 (2016/17 - 2021/22) Integrated Assessment Report Appendices Transport for Greater Manchester June 2016 1 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Notice This document and its contents have been prepared and are intended solely for Transport for Greater Manchester’s information and use in relation to the Integrated Assessment of the Greater Manchester 2040 Transport Strategy and Delivery Plan 1. Atkins Ltd assumes no responsibility to any other party in respect of or arising out of or in connection with this document and/or its contents. This report has been prepared by sustainability specialists and does not purport to provide legal advice. Document history Job number: 5144920 Document ref: IA Report Appendices Revision Purpose description Originated Checked Reviewed Authorised Date Rev 1.0 Partial draft for comments Sustainability P McEntee C West C West 31/03/16 team Rev 2.0 Full draft for comment P McEntee C West C West C West 20/06/16 Rev 3.0 Final for consultation P McEntee P McEntee C West C West 29/06/16 Client signoff Client Transport for Greater Manchester Project Greater Manchester Transport Strategy2040 and Delivery Plan 1 (2016/17 – 2021/22) Integrated Assessment Document title Integrated Assessment Report (Appendices) Job no. 5144920 Copy no. Document IA Report Appendices reference 2 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Table of contents Appendix A. Responses to the IA Key Sustainability Issues Technical Note 4 Appendix B. Policy documents reviewed for the IA 12 Appendix C. Baseline data 18 Appendix D. Assessment of Alternatives 73 Appendix E. Assessment of Draft Transport Strategy 93 Appendix F. Assessment of Delivery Plan 1 265 3 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Appendix A. Responses to the IA Key Sustainability Issues Technical Note 4 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Note: Tables 1, 2 and 3 in the Key Sustainability Issues Technical Note have become Tables 4, 5 and 7 in the IA Report Respondent Comments Response Action Environment EA agree that all sustainability issues that lie within their remit have been identified. EA also agree Comments Noted. IA Team to Agency with the wording of the IA, EqIA and HIA objectives. In particular it is ensure that as noted that better assessment Suggest that in addition to protection / enhancement of protected sites, focus is placed on other emphasis should develops, greater habitats of local importance. be placed on the emphasis is WFD and how placed on WFD EA support the use of Green Infrastructure to provide alternative transport modes to realise wider Green / Blue objectives and environmental benefits. Infrastructure can need to address help address its past industrial Where possible the Transport Strategy should seek to improve the status of all water bodies to requirements as legacy. comply with the objectives of WFD. In addition to SuDS the assessment should consider further well as realise enhancement opportunities to improve the various waterbodies within GM. Opportunities should also wider Continued focus be taken to reverse past industrial legacy and other reasons for failure in water quality – note the environmental will be placed on North West RBMP. benefits. all sites of biodiversity / Past industrial legacy should also be dealt with through use of Brownfield sites and Contaminated Dealing with the habitat land remediation. past industrial importance – not legacy of GM is a just those Need to reword text relating to Flooding to make it clear that development should not increase major issue and protected sites. flooding elsewhere or increase in flood risk, rather than just minimisation of impact. Note though that should be The IA will be some options e.g. Footpaths. Cycleways etc can be ‘water compatible’ and can be in areas of flood addressed at all amended to risk. As well as the use of blue infrastructure there should also be an emphasis on the use of green opportunities due to reflect this. infrastructure to reduce flooding impacts its ongoing environmental In addition to In relation to assessment prompt questions and the Objective of ‘Conserve and Enhance the Water impact. SuDS, the IA will Environment’, seeking to comply with the objectives of the WFD a further prompt should be included consider other which considers whether or not there will be opportunities to improve water body status as part of the potential strategy. opportunities to improve waterbodies across GM. The IA will make it clear that any proposed 5 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Respondent Comments Response Action development should not increase flood risk or flooding, though it will also recognise that some development is compatible with flood zones e.g. some green infrastructure. A further Assessment prompt question will be included as follows: Will the Transport Strategy provide opportunities to improve water body status? Association AGMA agree all Key Sustainability Issues have been identified and agree with the wording of the IA, Comments Noted. A further of Greater EqIA and HIA objectives. In particular the Assessment Manchester encouragement for prompt question Authorities AGMA encourage the use of Green Infrastructure to provide alternative modes of transport such as Green re. Green & Blue (AGMA) cycleways, footpaths etc. and this can realise wider environmental benefits. Infrastructure is Infrastructure will noted as is the be incorporated Where possible the Transport Strategy should seek to improve the status of the natural environment encouragement to into the IA. This including water bodies. The assessment should consider further enhancement opportunities to utilise brownfield question will be improve the biodiversity. We would encourage the efficient use of brownfield sites and the sites and to avoid as follows: Will 6 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Respondent Comments Response Action remediation of contaminated land through this process. Where possible the strategy should seek to areas of highest the Transport avoid areas of highest flood risk to ensure future resilience to climate change. flood risk. Strategy provide opportunities to A further Assessment prompt question should be included which considers whether or not there will improve Green & be opportunities to improve green and blue infrastructure as part of the strategy. Blue Infrastructure? Greater As a general comment, we feel it is well written and covers well the sustainability issues and the HIA Comments Noted. The IA will be Manchester objectives. amended to Health In particular it is reflect that some Protection Technical Note needs to reflect and be clearer on the fact that some measures are already in place. considered measures are Team – The text should show what has been done so far, which measures are in place, how successful they important that the already in place Public Health were, and if GM should continue to apply these measures, as well as the discussion of additional IA is as up to date and will provide England (M measures looking forward. as possible. details of these. Brown) Comment will also It would be relevant to know what contribution to targets individual measures could make – example However, although be made on how given of CO2 target. consideration will effective these be made of likely are. Future Plans and targets are also referenced e.g. Defra’s “Plans to improve air quality in the UK: future targets and Tackling nitrogen dioxide in our towns and cities. List of UK and National measures”. plans, it is not Further possible to fully Assessment Noted that although compliance with current standards is clearly a crucial objective, it is important to consider these Prompt question note that further population health benefits are to be expected if levels of some air pollutants are aspects until the to be included. reduced even further. relevant targets & This is as follows: plans have been “Does the A further Assessment prompt question may be: does the strategy set out how TfGM will ensure that published. strategy set out the best evidence and examples of good practice from around the world are considered when choices how TfGM will are being made for GM? ensure that the best evidence and examples of good practice from around the world are considered when choices are being made for 7 GM Transport Strategy 2040 and Delivery Plan 1 Integrated Assessment (Appendices) Atkins Respondent Comments Response Action GM”? Strategic Supportive of the Strategy and satisfied with level of detail, though make the following comments: Comments Noted. A review of the IA Growth will ensure that Services, In relation to Key Sustainability Issues in Tables 1 and 2, for Air Quality, reference should be made to In particular the emphasis is emissions from freight HGV’s and LGV’s a as these have a significant impact on nitrogen dioxide recent GM Climate placed upon the Trafford levels and PM10 levels. (although this is picked up in table 2). It is considered useful to make Change Strategy potential impact of Council reference to other relevant strategies such as recent GM Climate Change Strategy (incorporating air will be reviewed in congestion on the quality). light of the environment, aspirations of the economy etc and Also in relation to Air Quality, consideration should be given to PM 2.5 levels also. Transport Strategy. will fully explain the implications of In relation to whether all relevant implications/opportunities for the Transport Strategy been identified In addition the IA this. in Tables 1 and 2, with regard to noise, reference should be made to government Noise Action Plans will incorporate new for roads, agglomerations under the Environmental Noise (England) Regulations 2006. work being Reference will be undertaken by the made to HGV / The consultee agrees with the wording of the IA, EqIA and HIA objectives that have been identified in Combined Authority LGV emissions.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • North West Geography
    ISSN 1476-180 North West Geography Volume 8, Number 1, 2008 North West Geography, Volume 8, 2008 1 A deeper understanding of climate induced risk to urban infrastructure: case studies of past events in Greater Manchester Nigel Lawson and Sarah Lindley Geography, School of Environment and Development The University of Manchester Email: [email protected] Abstract A detailed knowledge of past events is sometimes used to help understand and manage potential future risks. Flood risk management is one area where this has been particularly true, but the same ideas could theoretically be applied to other potential climate induced impacts in urban areas such as subsidence, sewer collapse and land movement. Greater Manchester, as the world’s first industrial city, provides an ideal case study of how such events have affected the urban infrastructure in the past. This paper reviews some of the evidence which can be gleaned from past events and also shows how the realisation of some climate-related risks in heavy modified urban environments can only be fully understood through a consideration of sub-surface as well as surface characteristics. Key words flood, subsidence, risk assessment, Greater Manchester Introduction element which is exposed. It follows, therefore, that unless Urban areas have always been prone to climate-related risks there is a connection between all three risk components, as a result of their ability to modify physical processes such there can be no risk. Using these terms, drivers of changing as drainage and heat exchange and their high concentration patterns of risk can be seen to be as much associated with of people and property.
    [Show full text]
  • Barton Upon Irwell Conservation Area Appraisal
    Barton-Upon-Irwell Conservation Area Appraisal Draft October 2015 Barton – Upon – Irwell Conservation Area : Conservation Area Appraisal : October 2015 Barton-upon-Irwell Conservation Area Conservation Area Appraisal Draft: October 2015 Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 1 1.1. Designation of Barton-upon-Irwell Conservation Area........................................................... 1 1.2. Definition of a Conservation Area ........................................................................................... 1 1.3. Value of Conservation Area Appraisals ................................................................................... 3 1.4. Scope of the Appraisal............................................................................................................. 4 2. Planning Policy Context ......................................................................................................... 5 2.1. National and Local Planning Policies ....................................................................................... 5 2.2. Conservation Area Policy Guidance ........................................................................................ 6 2.3. Control Measures brought about by Designation .................................................................. 7 3. Summary of Special Interest .................................................................................................. 9 3.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Electoral Review of Salford City Council
    Electoral review of Salford City Council Response to the Local Government Boundary Commission for England’s consultation on Warding Patterns August 2018 1 1 Executive Summary 1.1 Salford in 2018 has changed dramatically since the city’s previous electoral review of 2002. Salford has seen a turnaround in its fortunes over recent years, reversing decades of population decline and securing high levels of investment. The city is now delivering high levels of growth, in both new housing and new jobs, and is helping to drive forward both Salford’s and the Greater Manchester economies. 1.2 The election of the Greater Manchester Mayor and increased devolution of responsibilities to Greater Manchester, and the Greater Manchester Combined Authority, is fundamentally changing the way Salford City Council works in areas of economic development, transport, work and skills, planning, policing and more recently health and social care. 1.3 Salford’s directly elected City Mayor has galvanised the city around eight core priorities – the Great Eight. Delivering against these core priorities will require the sustained commitment and partnership between councillors, partners in the private, public, community and voluntary and social enterprise sectors, and the city’s residents. This is even more the case in the light of ongoing national policy changes, the impending departure of the UK from the EU, and continued austerity in funding for vital local services. The city’s councillors will have an absolutely central role in delivering against these core priorities, working with all our partners and residents to harness the energies and talents of all of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION and a Number of Corridors As Illustrated in Figure 3
    For ease of reporting the whole engagement area has been divided into 37 zones as displayed in Figure 2 INTRODUCTION and a number of corridors as illustrated in Figure 3. This report summarises the first phase of engagement as Stockport Council looks to develop Active Neighbourhood proposals in the Heaton’s. An Active Neighbourhood aims to enable residents to make short trips on foot, by cycle and by public transport in preference to car travel. Figure 1 shows a screenshot from the website (https://heatons.commonplace.is/) which was open for comments between 7th September 2020 and 23rd October 2020. There were 5228 visitors to the website over the course of the seven-week engagement period. During this time, 7788 contributions were recorded in the form of a comment (1298 representing 17%) or an expression of agreement (6490 representing 83%). The contributions were made by a total of 1331 respondents of which 553 subscribed to receive email notifications informing them of project updates. Figure 2 - Consultation area zones Each chapter of this report will contain a table summarising the comments within each zone / corridor and each comment will be allocated a reference number. Figure 1 - Screenshot from https://heatons.commonplace.is/ website March 2021 Stockport Council Figure 3 - Consultation area corridors March 2021 Stockport Council ZONE 1: SOUTH OF A5145 DIDSBURY ROAD AND WEST OF STATION ROAD & VALE ROAD This chapter reports on pins dropped to the south of the A5145 Didsbury Road and to the west of Station Road & Vale Road. The zone includes Heaton Mersey Industrial Estate, Embankment Business Park, and Heaton Mersey Valley Golf Course.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Environment Assessment
    Historic Environment Assessment GMSF Land Allocations, Manchester GMA11 Roundthorn Medipark Extension Client: Manchester City Council Technical Report: Rachael Reader Report No: 2020/4 Document Title: Greater Manchester Spatial Framework Land Allocations, Manchester: GMA11 Roundthorn Medipark Extension Document Type: Historic Environment Assessment Prepared for: Manchester City Council Report No: SA/2020/4 Version: Version 1.0 Author: Rachael Reader Position: Heritage Consultant Date: July 2020 Approved By: Anthony Lee Position: Senior Project Manager Date: July 2020 Signed: Copyright: Copyright for this document remains with the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford. Contact: Centre for Applied Archaeology, LG 19 – 25 Peel Building, University of Salford, the Crescent, Salford, M5 4WU. Telephone: 0161 295 0145 Email: [email protected] Disclaimer: This document has been prepared by the Centre for Applied Archaeology, University of Salford for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be used or relied upon for any other project without an independent check being undertaken to assess its suitability and the prior written consent and authority obtained from the Centre for Applied Archaeology. The University of Salford accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than those for which it was commissioned. Other persons/parties using or relying on this document for other such purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify the University of Salford for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. The University of Salford accepts no liability or responsibility for this document to any other party/persons than by whom it was commissioned Contents 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues and Options Topic Papers
    Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council Local Development Framework Joint Core Strategy and Development Management Policies Development Plan Document Issues and Options Topic Papers February 2012 Strategic Planning Tameside MBC Room 5.16, Council Offices Wellington Road Ashton-under-Lyne OL6 6DL Tel: 0161 342 3346 Email: [email protected] For a summary of this document in Gujurati, Bengali or Urdu please contact 0161 342 8355 It can also be provided in large print or audio formats Local Development Framework – Core Strategy Issues and Options Discussion Paper Topic Paper 1 – Housing 1.00 Background • Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) • Regional Spatial Strategy North West • Planning for Growth, March 2011 • Manchester Independent Economic Review (MIER) • Tameside Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) • Tameside Strategic Housing Market Assessment 2008 (SHMA) • Tameside Unitary Development Plan 2004 • Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 • Tameside Sustainable Community Strategy 2009-2019 • Gypsy and Traveller Accommodation Assessment • Tameside Residential Design Supplementary Planning Document (SPD) 1.01 The Tameside Housing Strategy 2010-2016 is underpinned by a range of studies and evidence based reports that have been produced to respond to housing need at a local level as well as reflecting the broader national and regional housing agenda. 2.00 National Policy 2.01 At the national level Planning Policy Statement 3: Housing (PPS3) sets out the planning policy framework for delivering the Government's housing objectives setting out policies, procedures and standards which Local Planning Authorities must adhere to and use to guide local policy and decisions. 2.02 The principle aim of PPS3 is to increase housing delivery through a more responsive approach to local land supply, supporting the Government’s goal to ensure that everyone has the opportunity of living in decent home, which they can afford, in a community where they want to live.
    [Show full text]
  • Davenport Green to Ardwick
    High Speed Two Phase 2b ww.hs2.org.uk October 2018 Working Draft Environmental Statement High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report | Volume 2 | MA07 MA07: Davenport Green to Ardwick High Speed Two (HS2) Limited Two Snowhill, Snow Hill Queensway, Birmingham B4 6GA Freephone: 08081 434 434 Minicom: 08081 456 472 Email: [email protected] H10 hs2.org.uk October 2018 High Speed Rail (Crewe to Manchester and West Midlands to Leeds) Working Draft Environmental Statement Volume 2: Community Area report MA07: Davenport Green to Ardwick H10 hs2.org.uk High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has been tasked by the Department for Transport (DfT) with managing the delivery of a new national high speed rail network. It is a non-departmental public body wholly owned by the DfT. High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, Two Snowhill Snow Hill Queensway Birmingham B4 6GA Telephone: 08081 434 434 General email enquiries: [email protected] Website: www.hs2.org.uk A report prepared for High Speed Two (HS2) Limited: High Speed Two (HS2) Limited has actively considered the needs of blind and partially sighted people in accessing this document. The text will be made available in full on the HS2 website. The text may be freely downloaded and translated by individuals or organisations for conversion into other accessible formats. If you have other needs in this regard please contact High Speed Two (HS2) Limited. © High Speed Two (HS2) Limited, 2018, except where otherwise stated. Copyright in the typographical arrangement rests with High Speed Two (HS2) Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • Barton Upon Irwell Conservation Area Appraisal SPD5.6A
    TRAFFORD COUNCIL SPD5.6: Barton Upon Irwell Conservation Area Appraisal SPD5.6a: Barton Upon Irwell Conservation Area Management Plan Consultation Statement March 2016 Conservation Area Appraisal and Management Plan Consultation Statement Trafford Council Contents 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2. Statement of Community Involvement Review .............................................................. 1 3. Public Consultation ........................................................................................................ 1 4. Consultation Responses and Main Issues .................................................................... 3 5. Main Changes to the SPD ............................................................................................. 4 Appendix 1 – List of Consultees ........................................................................................ 13 Appendix 2 – Local Advertisement – Conservation Management Plan ............................. 17 Appendix 2 – Local Advertisement – Conservation Area Appraisal ................................... 18 Supplementary Planning Document Conservation Area Appraisal Consultation Statement Trafford Council 1. Introduction 1.1. In preparing Supplementary Planning Documents (SPDs), the Council is required to follow the procedures laid down in the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012, and its adopted Statement of Community Involvement
    [Show full text]
  • Approximately 126 Members of the Public Attended the Meeting
    KEARSLEY AREA FORUM WEDNESDAY 10th FEBRUARY 2016 Present – approximately 126 members of the public attended the meeting. Councillor Carol Burrows - Kearsley Ward Councillor Derek Burrows - Kearsley Ward Councillor Liam Irving - Kearsley Ward Also in attendance John Pye - Neighbourhood Manager Stephen Rowson - Chief Executive’s Department Chris Lloyd - Environmental Services Rafael Martinez - Environmental Services James Hall - Lancashire Wildlife Trust (LWT) PC Andrew Smart - Greater Manchester Police PCSO Philip Gough - Greater Manchester Police Apologies were received from Yasmin Qureshi MP Councillor Derek Burrows in the Chair. 8. WELCOME AND INTRODUCTIONS Councillor Derek Burrows welcomed everyone to the meeting and introduced the other Councillors and Officers in attendance. 9. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST FROM COUNCILLORS AND OFFICERS There were no Declarations of Interest. 10. MINUTES OF THE PREVIOUS MEETING The minutes of the previous meeting held on 21 September 2015 were submitted and approved as a correct record. 11. PRESENTATION – KINGFISHER TRAIL Prior to the main presentation Councillor Derek Burrows introduced a local resident who advised residents about a planned community project being set up. The main points were: Already been involved in the scarecrow festival and the Christmas lights switch on. Now want to set up a Kearsley in Bloom event. Event to run May-August Involving local schools with floral displays and projects. Involving businesses with hanging baskets and encouraging residents to spruce up gardens. Volunteers needed for all sorts of tasks from hands-on to publicity to leaflet delivery. Meeting set for the following Wednesday 17/02/2016, 7pm at Kearsley Mount Methodist Church. Councillor Derek Burrows then introduced James Hall from the Lancashire Wildlife Trust who gave a presentation about the revitalisation of the Kingfisher Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Wilburn Street Basin, Ordsall Lane, Salford
    Wilburn Street Basin, Ordsall Lane, Salford Archaeological Desk- based Assessment Oxford Archaeology North August 2014 Renaker Planning Application: 14/64851/FUL Issue No: 2014-15/1551 OA North Job No: L10775 NGR: 382655 397880 Document Title: WILBURN STREET BASIN, ORDSALL LANE, SALFORD Document Type: Archaeological Desk-based Assessment Client: Renaker Planning Application: 14/64851/FUL Issue Number: 2014-15/1551 OA Job Number: L10775 National Grid Reference: 382655 397880 Prepared by: Ian Miller Signed Position: Senior Project Manager Date: August 2014 Approved by: Alan Lupton Signed Position: Operations Manager Date: August 2014 Oxford Archaeology North Oxford Archaeology Ltd (2014) Mill 3 Janus House Moor Lane Mills Osney Mead Moor Lane Oxford Lancaster OX2 0EA LA1 1GF t: (0044) 01524 541000 t: (0044) 01865 263800 f: (0044) 01524 848606 f: (0044) 01865 793496 w: www.oxfordarch.co.uk e: [email protected] Oxford Archaeology Limited is a Registered Charity No: 285627 Disclaimer: This document has been prepared for the titled project or named part thereof and should not be relied upon or used for any other project without an independent check being carried out as to its suitability and prior written authority of Oxford Archaeology Ltd being obtained. Oxford Archaeology Ltd accepts no responsibility or liability for the consequences of this document being used for a purpose other than the purposes for which it was commissioned. Any person/party using or relying on the document for such other purposes agrees, and will by such use or reliance be taken to confirm their agreement to indemnify Oxford Archaeology Ltd or all loss or damage resulting therefrom.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Copy of the Report
    City of Manchester Plan 1945, abridged edition This report has been digitised by Joe Blakey and Martin Dodge from the Department of Geography, University of Manchester. The digitisation was supported by the Manchester Statistical Society’s Campion Fund. The copy of the report digitised kindly provided by Richard Brook, Manchester School of Architecture. Permission to digitise and release the report under Creative Commons license was kindly granted by Manchester Libraries, Information and Archives, Manchester City Council. (Email: [email protected]) This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. 20 July 2013. C O NTENTS PR A .. page 2 I. TH D · I N 3 The Purpose of Pla nning- The Pla n in Outline-Ways and Mean II . H F UN I ATION 7 Basic Surveys-Popula tion- The Fa mily Unit J II . II • RAM WORK 10 The Z ning Scheme- Indu trial Planning- Highways JV. T H STR TUR 16 Design fo r Li ving- Ho mes- Types of Dwelling - l ndoor Space- Outdoor Space- School - The eighbo urhood- The District Y. R H SJN 28 Density- The Overspi ll Pro blem- The Redevelopment Programme- The Satellite VJ. 36 Sy tem- Ri vers- A mokeless ity- District H eating YJL. T li E R , IONAL A PJT L 40 Learning, Med icine a nd Lhe rts-The ity Centre-Transport- C ivic Building V LJL. T I-l - OND IT IONS 0 u ss 51 Fu rther Legisla ti o n- Loca l Government- T he Prospect Th e author\· acknowl dgment and thanks ore due to MR.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Gatwick Ave and Hilditch Close (097225) to Wythenshawe Area Committee 17 November 2011
    Manchester City Council Item 5 - List No. 3 Wythenshawe Area Committee 17 November 2011 Application Number Date of Appln Committee Date Ward 097225/FO/2011/S2 31 Aug 2011 17 Nov 2011 Baguley Ward Proposal Erection of ground floor communal entrance with extended bin store, installation of access ramp and enclosure of communal stairway with glazing panels Location 2-6a Gatwick Avenue And 1-11 Hilditch Close, Baguley, Manchester, M23 1NE, Applicant Mr Glenn Millward, Parkway Green Housing Trust, Parkway Green House, 460 Palatine Road, Northenden, Manchester , M22 4DJ Agent Mr David Farr, Arcus Consulting LLP, Corner House, 177 Cross Street, Sale, M33 7JQ Description This application was previously placed before a meeting of the Wythenshawe Area Committee on 27 th October 2011 with a recommendation of minded to approve (Subject to the expiry of consultation period on 31st October and no new issues being raised). At that meeting the Wythenshawe Area Committee deferred the application to allow for further consultation to take place between the applicant and residents to seek to overcome the objections and concerns raised in the meeting, and to allow the applicants to attend Wythenshawe Area Committee to answer any questions raised by the Committee. The application sites are four, 2 storey block of flats located on Hilditch Close and Gatwick Avenue in the ward of Baguley namely 2-6a Gatwick Avenue and 1-11 Hilditch Close. The area is predominantly residential however to the south of Gatwick Avenue, stands Baguley Hall, a Grade I listed building and Scheduled Ancient Monument. The applicant is proposing to erect ground floor communal entrances which incorporate a bin store and to enclose the communal stairway with glazing panels at each of the four block of flats.
    [Show full text]