The Future of Global Affairs Managing Discontinuity, Disruption and Destruction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Future of Global Affairs Managing Discontinuity, Disruption and Destruction The Future of Global Affairs Managing Discontinuity, Disruption and Destruction Edited by Christopher Ankersen · Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu Foreword by Helen Clark and Vera Jelinek DOWNLOAD CSS Notes, Books, MCQs, Magazines www.thecsspoint.com Download CSS Notes Download CSS Books Download CSS Magazines Download CSS MCQs Download CSS Past Papers The CSS Point, Pakistan’s The Best Online FREE Web source for All CSS Aspirants. Email: [email protected] BUY CSS / PMS / NTS & GENERAL KNOWLEDGE BOOKS ONLINE CASH ON DELIVERY ALL OVER PAKISTAN Visit Now: WWW.CSSBOOKS.NET For Oder & Inquiry Call/SMS/WhatsApp 0333 6042057 – 0726 540141 Join CSS Point Forum Today Discuss, Learn and Explore The World of CSS www.csspoint.com.pk For any Query, Please Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 ENGLISH PRECIS & COMPOSITION HAFIZ KARIM DAD CHUGTAI For Order Call/WhatsApp 03336042057 - 0726540141 The Future of Global Affairs “The Future of Global Affairs is an exciting and balanced contribution to the debate about the potential trajectory of a world in flux. Tinged more with concern than utopian optimism, this volume captures a panoramic view of our cacophonous and disorderly world that is on the verge of disequilibrium and potential destruction unless key political actors, institutions, and processes can find a way to adapt global affairs to an increasingly plurilateral and intermestic era. A must-read for serious IR scholars; written in a way that is understandable to the lay person.” —W. Andy Knight, Ph.D., FRSC, University of Alberta “What is the future of the state? Is multilateralism overrated as an answer to the diverse ills plaguing the global system? How might climate change disrupt geopolitical alliances that have been essential to peace in different regions of the world? Inspired by these and other urgent questions, this simultaneously illuminating and profoundly unsettling book traces the contours of the ascendant geopolitics, illustrating how one class of events can have contrasting resonances and implications around the world. Each chapter explores a different facet of global affairs, offering perspectives that, though not rosy, serious students of world politics will do well to take to heart.” —Ebenezer Obadare, Professor of Sociology, University of Kansas Christopher Ankersen · Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu Editors The Future of Global Affairs Managing Discontinuity, Disruption and Destruction Editors Christopher Ankersen Waheguru Pal Singh Sidhu Center for Global Affairs Center for Global Affairs School of Professional Studies School of Professional Studies New York University New York University New York, NY, USA New York, NY, USA ISBN 978-3-030-56469-8 ISBN 978-3-030-56470-4 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56470-4 © The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 This work is subject to copyright. All rights are solely and exclusively licensed by the Publisher, whether the whole or part of the material is concerned, specifically the rights of translation, reprinting, reuse of illustrations, recitation, broadcasting, reproduction on microfilms or in any other physical way, and transmission or information storage and retrieval, electronic adaptation, computer software, or by similar or dissimilar methodology now known or hereafter developed. The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, service marks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use. The publisher, the authors and the editors are safe to assume that the advice and informa- tion in this book are believed to be true and accurate at the date of publication. Neither the publisher nor the authors or the editors give a warranty, expressed or implied, with respect to the material contained herein or for any errors or omissions that may have been made. The publisher remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Cover image: Felix Lipov/Alamy Stock Photo This Palgrave Macmillan imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland Foreword by Helen Clark The United Nations (UN) was founded 75 years ago to advance peace, human rights, and development—a mandate as relevant today as it was in 1945. Its most remarkable year in recent times in achieving global consensus on a better future for all was 2015. That year, agreement was reached on Agenda 2030 and its seventeen Sustainable Develop- ment Goals (SDGs), the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduc- tion, the Addis Ababa Action Agenda on Financing for Development, and the Paris Climate Agreement. The New Urban Agenda was agreed the following year at the UN’s Habitat III Conference on Housing and Sustainable Development. Taken together, these constitute an ambitious agenda, which if implemented in full would transform the prospects of the world’s peoples and ecosystems. This ambition is consistent with the UN’s impressive track record of agenda-setting—the UN was credited by the UN Intellectual History Project for having been an incubator of new and powerful ideas which have shaped norms, policies, and practice in many areas. It has been a platform for the negotiation of a substantial body of international law, and it has enabled much practical development, and humanitarian work. In earlier years, it played a significant role in supporting decolonization, which in turn led to the expansion of its membership from the 51 member states present at its founding to the 193 of today. That is not to say that the UN’s record has been without blemish. The 1994 genocide in Rwanda and the 1995 massacre in Srebrenica—also v vi FOREWORD BY HELEN CLARK called a genocide by many—where peacekeepers were present and did not act to save lives, will always be a stain on its reputation. Ongoing issues of sexual and gender-based violence by peacekeepers and in individual UN organizations are a disgrace. Despite those shortcomings, however, we should not lose sight of the fact that the reason for the UN’s existence is to contribute to global public goods, and these days, in doing so, to contribute to the protection and management of the global commons. Yet this premier institution in the multilateral system is now under significant strain. Our world is preoccupied by a wide range of conflicts, other geopolitical and geoeconomic tensions, environmental crises, and disease outbreaks. In zones of conflict, there continue to be loss of life, poor services, and little hope for many. Displacement crises are protracted, and the numbers of those forcibly displaced are at record levels—now over seventy million. Essential humanitarian relief is a first call on official devel- opment assistance, leaving less for the poor in low income but more stable countries. And, on reflection, the major international agreements reached in 2015 could not have been concluded today; such is the impact of polit- ical change since then in key capitals from Washington DC to Brasilia and beyond. The current situation makes reaching the SDG targets a stretch. In 2030, we could well see some six percent of the world’s population still living in extreme poverty—far from the target of eradication. The absolute numbers of hungry people in the world are increasing—according to the World Food Programme, the total stands at around 820 million, or one in every nine people on earth. UNESCO reports suggest that one in every six children will not be able to achieve the SDG target of having twelve years education by 2030. While the SDGs were always an aspirational agenda, to fall so short of their targets not only makes a mockery of them, but also calls into question the seriousness of the member states which committed to them and the credibility of the international system. The same is true of the woeful underperformance on implementation of the Paris Climate Agree- ment, which the 2019 Madrid climate change Conference of Parties made plain. If solemnly reached agreements are followed by little action, what, many will ask, is their point? For a variety of reasons, the UN has also found it hard to address new waves of conflict effectively. Its conventional response of dispatching peacekeepers where there is a peace to be kept is often inadequate—peace- keepers may be sent where there is no peace to keep, and they may be FOREWORD BY HELEN CLARK vii neither equipped to act nor have a mandate to act to stem the violence which greets them. In a number of the currently raging conflicts, there is no mandate for UN peacekeepers to be present at all. All too often these conflicts are in effect proxy wars, with the powerful patrons who back warring parties having little interest in international mediation. Additionally, the UN is largely a bystander as key parts of the nuclear weapons control architecture are being dismantled. An egregious example is that of the Iran nuclear deal which was endorsed by the UN Security Council. The US withdrawal from the agreement was a direct challenge to the authority of the Council which all UN member states are bound to uphold. The expiry of the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty between the United States and what is now Russia is a major threat to peace and security, but one which the multilateral system in its current state is not equipped to address. Challenging as the outlook for the multilateral system currently is, however, it would be wrong to walk away from it. Its institutions need to be maintained for times when geopolitics are more conducive to making them effective. Disengaging only contributes to their decline in rele- vance.
Recommended publications
  • The Availability Heuristic
    CHAPTER 11 THE AVAILABILITY HEURISTIC According to Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman (1974, p. 1127), the availability heuristic is a rule of thumb in which decision makers "assess the frequency of a class or the probability of an event by the ease with which instances or occurrences can be brought to mind." Usually this heuristic works quite well; all things being equal, common events are easier to remember or imagine than are uncommon events. By rely­ ing on availability to estimate frequency and probability, decision mak­ ers are able to simplify what might otherwise be very difficult judg­ ments. As with any heuristic, however, there are cases in which the general rule of thumb breaks down and leads to systematic biases. Some events are more available than others not because they tend to occur frequently or with high probability, but because they are inherently easier to think about, because they have taken place recently, because they are highly emotional, and so forth. This chapter examines three general questions: (1) What are instances in which the availability heuristic leads to biased judgments? (2) Do decision makers perceive an event as more likely after they have imagined it happening? (3) How is vivid information dif­ ferent from other information? AVAILABILITY GOES AWRY Which is a more likely cause of death in the United States-being killed by falling airplane parts or by a shark? Most people rate shark attacks as more probable than death from falling airplane parts (see Item #7 of the Reader Survey for your answer). Shark attacks certainly receive more publicity than do deaths from falling airplane parts, and they are far easier to imagine (thanks in part to movies such as Jaws).
    [Show full text]
  • Political Economy, Media, and Climate Change: Sinews of Modern Life Maxwell T
    Advanced Review Political economy, media, and climate change: sinews of modern life Maxwell T. Boykoff1∗ and Tom Yulsman2 In this 21st century, examining how climate change is described and considered, largely through mass media, is as important as formal climate governance to the long-term success or failure of efforts to confront the challenge. Mass media stitch together formal science and policy with the public sphere. And many dynamic, contested factors contribute to how media outlets portray climate change. This paper addresses contemporary political economics—from greater workloads and reductions in specialist science journalism to digital innovations and new media organizational forms—as they relate to media coverage of climate change. By way of recent studies and indications of these dynamics, we appraise how power flows through culture, politics, and society, to construct coverage, public discourses, and knowledge on climate change. In so doing, we explore how media representations of climate change have changed over time, and particularly how the rise of digital media has reshaped climate coverage. Considerations of climate change, arguably the most heavily politicized scientific issue at the turn of the new millennium, seek to inform and anticipate corollary science issues, such as ongoing concerns for genetically modified organisms, nanotechnology risks, and increased threats to water quantity and quality. The focus on political economy—the ‘sinews’ of modern life—can also then help to inform perceptions and decision making in associated environmental challenges. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. How to cite this article: WIREs Clim Change 2013. doi: 10.1002/wcc.233 INTRODUCTION and livelihoods—depend directly on our exploitation of carbon-based fuels.2 New York Times journalist John Broder3 wrote that these issues are ‘the sinews The world is going one way, people are going another of modern life’.
    [Show full text]
  • Nudge Theory
    Nudge Theory http://www.businessballs.com/nudge-theory.htm Nudge theory is a flexible and modern concept for: • understanding of how people think, make decisions, and behave, • helping people improve their thinking and decisions, • managing change of all sorts, and • identifying and modifying existing unhelpful influences on people. Nudge theory was named and popularized by the 2008 book, 'Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness', written by American academics Richard H Thaler and Cass R Sunstein. The book is based strongly on the Nobel prize- winning work of the Israeli-American psychologists Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. This article: • reviews and explains Thaler and Sunstein's 'Nudge' concept, especially 'heuristics' (tendencies for humans to think and decide instinctively and often mistakenly) • relates 'Nudge' methods to other theories and models, and to Kahneman and Tversky's work • defines and describes additional methods of 'nudging' people and groups • extends the appreciation and application of 'Nudge' methodology to broader change- management, motivation, leadership, coaching, counselling, parenting, etc • offers 'Nudge' methods and related concepts as a 'Nudge' theory 'toolkit' so that the concept can be taught and applied in a wide range of situations involving relationships with people, and enabling people to improve their thinking and decision- making • and offers a glossary of Nudge theory and related terms 'Nudge' theory was proposed originally in US 'behavioral economics', but it can be adapted and applied much more widely for enabling and encouraging change in people, groups, or yourself. Nudge theory can also be used to explore, understand, and explain existing influences on how people behave, especially influences which are unhelpful, with a view to removing or altering them.
    [Show full text]
  • Norms, Beliefs, & Practices Relevant to the Prevention of COVID-19 in The
    Prepared by Anthrologica | 2021 A PT Norms, beliefs, practices relevant to the prevention of COVID-19 in the Middle East North Africa: a literatre analyi AAY 2021 1 2 Prepared by Anthrologica | 2021 Disclaimer This technical paper is intended to disseminate analytical contributions on the risk communi- cations and community engagement COVID-19 response in Eastern Mediterranean/Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, which is co-led by World Health Organisation (WHO), UNICEF, and International Federation of the Red Cross (IFRC). The literature review was prepared by Anthrologica, and institutionally commissioned by UNICEF MENA regional office, Communication for Development section. The findings, interpretations and conclusions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF and its partners. The text has not been edited to official publications standards and UNICEF accepts no re- sponsibility for errors. Extracts from this publication may be freely reproduced with due acknowledgement. Requests to utilize larger portions or the full publication should be addressed to UNICEF MENARO at [email protected]. Suggested citation: Butler N, Tulloch O, and Karam S., Norms, beliefs, and practices relevant to the prevention of COVID-19 in the Middle East and North Africa: a literature analysis, February 2021, UNICEF Middle East and North Africa Region Office, Amman, Jordan 3 Acknowledgements and contributions This literature review was commissioned by the UNICEF Regional Office for the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) to identify what may influence sustained observance to COVID-19 prevention and risk reduction behaviours in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and inform its work on Risk Communication and Community Engagement in response to the COVID-19 crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Commentary on the EASO Country of Origin Information Reports on Syria (December 2019 – May 2020) July 2020
    Commentary on the EASO Country of Origin Information Reports on Syria (December 2019 – May 2020) July 2020 1 © ARC Foundation/Dutch Council for Refugees, June 2020 ARC Foundation and the Dutch Council for Refugees publications are covered by the Create Commons License allowing for limited use of ARC Foundation publications provided the work is properly credited to ARC Foundation and the Dutch Council for Refugees and it is for non- commercial use. ARC Foundation and the Dutch Council for Refugees do not hold the copyright to the content of third party material included in this report. ARC Foundation is extremely grateful to Paul Hamlyn Foundation for its support of ARC’s involvement in this project. Feedback and comments Please help us to improve and to measure the impact of our publications. We’d be most grateful for any comments and feedback as to how the reports have been used in refugee status determination processes, or beyond: https://asylumresearchcentre.org/feedback/. Thank you. Please direct any questions to [email protected]. 2 Contents Introductory remarks ......................................................................................................................................... 4 Key observations ................................................................................................................................................ 5 General methodological observations and recommendations ......................................................................... 9 Comments on any forthcoming
    [Show full text]
  • CHALK TALK Thinking About Thinking: Medical Decision Making Under the Microscope Christiana Iyasere, MD, and Douglas Wright, MD, Phd
    SGIM FORUM 2011; 34(11) CHALK TALK Thinking about Thinking: Medical Decision Making Under the Microscope Christiana Iyasere, MD, and Douglas Wright, MD, PhD Drs. Iyasere and Wright are faculty in the Inpatient Clinician Educator Service of the Department of Medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boson, MA. ase: A 36-year-old African-Ameri- athletic—he graduated from college than 10 seconds and says “20,160” C can woman, healthy except for with a degree in physics and has before moving breezily along with treated hypothyroidism, visits you in completed several triathlons. Neil is a her coffee. Having Katrina’s input, are clinic complaining of six months of fa- veteran of the US Navy, where he you tempted to change your answer tigue and progressive shortness of served as fleet naval aviator and land- to questions 3a and 3b? Go ahead, breath with exertion. You thoroughly ing signal officer. Is Neil more likely to admit it. Aren’t you now more confi- interview and examine the patient. be: a) a librarian or b) an astronaut? dent that the correct answer is that Physical examination reveals conjunc- Question 2: Jot down a list of the product is closest to 20,000? tival pallor and dullness to percussion English words that begin with the let- Question 5: You have known one third of the way up both lung ter “r” (e.g. rooster). Next, jot down your medical school roommate Jus- fields. Something tells you to ask her a list of words that have an r in the tice for four years.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    International Journal of Communication 14(2020), 5055–5071 1932–8036/20200005 Challenges in Codifying Events Within Large and Diverse Data Sets of Human Rights Documentation: Memory, Intent, and Bias JEFF DEUTCH1 Syrian Archive, Germany This article discusses challenges in codifying events within large and diverse data sets of human rights documentation, focusing on issues related to memory, intent, and bias. Clustering records by events allows for trends and patterns to be analyzed quickly and reliably, increasing the potential use of such content for research, advocacy, and accountability. Globally, archiving and preservation of user-generated digital materials documenting human rights abuses and war crimes are increasingly recognized as critical for advocacy, justice, and accountability. For the conflict in Syria, which began in 2011, there are more hours of user-generated content documenting rights violations uploaded to digital platforms than there have been hours in the conflict itself. Whereas some content has been clustered around specific events, such as larger open-source investigations by civil society and documentation efforts, the vast majority of content currently exists as individual unstructured records rather than jointly as clustered events within a relational database. The sheer amount of content and the near constant removals of materials from public channels mean that human rights monitors are in a race against time to preserve content, identify violations, and implicate potential perpetrators. Overcoming challenges
    [Show full text]
  • Mitigating Cognitive Bias and Design Distortion
    RSD2 Relating Systems Thinking and Design 2013 Working Paper. www.systemic-design.net Interliminal Design: Mitigating Cognitive Bias and Design Distortion 1 2 3 Andrew McCollough, PhD , DeAunne Denmark, MD, PhD , and Don Harker, MS “Design is an inquiry for action” - Harold Nelson, PhD Liminal: from the Latin word līmen, a threshold “Our values and biases are expressions of who we are. It isn’t so much that our prior commitments disable our ability to reason; it is that we need to appreciate that reasoning takes place, for the most part, in settings in which we are not neutral bystanders.” - Alva Noe In this globally interconnected and information-rich society, complexity and uncertainty are escalating at an unprecedented pace. Our most pressing problems are now considered wicked, or even super wicked, in that they commonly have incomplete, continuously changing, intricately interdependent yet contradictory requirements, urgent or emergency status, no central authority, and are often caused by the same entities charged with solving them (Rittel & Webber, 1973). Perhaps similar to philosopher Karl Jaspers’ Axial Age where ‘man asked radical questions’ and the ‘unquestioned grasp on life was loosened,’ communities of all kinds now face crises of “in-between”; necessary and large-scale dismantling of previous structures, institutions, and world-views has begun, but has yet to be replaced. Such intense periods of destruction and reconstruction, or liminality, eliminate boundary lines, reverse or dissolve social hierarchies, disrupt cultural continuity, and cast penetrating onto future outcomes. Originating in human ritual, liminal stages occur mid-transition, where initiates literally "stand at the threshold" between outmoded constructs of identity or community, and entirely new ways of being.
    [Show full text]
  • COVID-19 One More Setback for Refugees in MENA – Especially Women and Girls
    WORLD REFUGEE DAY SUMMARY Photo credit CARE Turkey COVID-19 One More Setback for Refugees in MENA – Especially Women and Girls Refugees and the displaced, the majority of them located in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region, are now faced with the COVID-19 pandemic and economically damaging efforts at its mitigation. Fragile gains in women’s workforce participation are at risk, gender-based violence is on the rise, and women’s voices are going unheeded. CARE’s soon-to-be-released Rapid Gender Analysis gathers together data from its country offices in MENA and beyond1 to provide a sobering picture of the pandemic’s impact on women and girls. Rapid Gender Analysis – Middle East North Africa (MENA) JUNE 2020 SUMMARY The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts at mitigating the virus’ spread in recent months have heightened the insecurity, psychosocial distress, economic vulnerability, gender inequality, and deprivation that already existed in countries in the Middle East and beyond. While men appear to have worse outcomes when infected with the coronavirus, women and girls are being deeply impacted– and fragile gains in women’s workforce participation are in jeopardy. 1 CARE offices in Syria, Jordan, Palestine West Bank/Gaza, Turkey, Egypt, Lebanon, Morocco, and the Caucasus all contributed to our forthcoming Regional Rapid Gender Analysis on COVID-19. care-international.org While female labor force participation rates have been comparatively One lesson we have learnt from the response low and resistant to change in MENA countries, modest increases 2 around the world is that it is crucial for in Jordan, Palestine West Bank/Gaza, Egypt, and Syria are “ endangered by mitigation measures that require the entire family women to assume positions of leadership to stay home, where schooling, caretaking, and housekeeping in health ministries, along with local and continue to fall mainly upon women and girls.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, Eds
    Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, eds. Nick Bostrom and Milan Cirkovic Draft of August 31, 2006. Eliezer Yudkowsky ([email protected]) Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Palo Alto, CA Introduction1 All else being equal, not many people would prefer to destroy the world. Even faceless corporations, meddling governments, reckless scientists, and other agents of doom, require a world in which to achieve their goals of profit, order, tenure, or other villainies. If our extinction proceeds slowly enough to allow a moment of horrified realization, the doers of the deed will likely be quite taken aback on realizing that they have actually destroyed the world. Therefore I suggest that if the Earth is destroyed, it will probably be by mistake. The systematic experimental study of reproducible errors of human reasoning, and what these errors reveal about underlying mental processes, is known as the heuristics and biases program in cognitive psychology. This program has made discoveries highly relevant to assessors of global catastrophic risks. Suppose you're worried about the risk of Substance P, an explosive of planet-wrecking potency which will detonate if exposed to a strong radio signal. Luckily there's a famous expert who discovered Substance P, spent the last thirty years working with it, and knows it better than anyone else in the world. You call up the expert and ask how strong the radio signal has to be. The expert replies that the critical threshold is probably around 4,000 terawatts. "Probably?" you query. "Can you give me a 98% confidence interval?" "Sure," replies the expert.
    [Show full text]
  • Heuristics & Biases Simplified
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences Capstones Behavioral and Decision Sciences Program 8-9-2019 Heuristics & Biases Simplified: Easy ot Understand One-Pagers that Use Plain Language & Examples to Simplify Human Judgement and Decision-Making Concepts Brittany Gullone University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/mbds Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Gullone, Brittany, "Heuristics & Biases Simplified: Easy to Understand One-Pagers that Use Plain Language & Examples to Simplify Human Judgement and Decision-Making Concepts" (2019). Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences Capstones. 7. https://repository.upenn.edu/mbds/7 The final capstone research project for the Master of Behavioral and Decision Sciences is an independent study experience. The paper is expected to: • Present a position that is unique, original and directly applies to the student's experience; • Use primary sources or apply to a primary organization/agency; • Conform to the style and format of excellent academic writing; • Analyze empirical research data that is collected by the student or that has already been collected; and • Allow the student to demonstrate the competencies gained in the master’s program. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/mbds/7 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Heuristics & Biases Simplified: Easy ot Understand One-Pagers that Use Plain Language & Examples to Simplify Human Judgement and Decision-Making Concepts Abstract Behavioral Science is a new and quickly growing field of study that has found ways of capturing readers’ attention across a variety of industries. The popularity of this field has led to a wealth of terms, concepts, and materials that describe human behavior and decision making.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Forecast
    February 2021 Monthly Forecast 1 Overview Overview 1 In Hindsight: Subsidiary Bodies Chairs and Penholders for 2021 In February, the UK will have the presidency of Panel of Experts assisting the 1591 Sudan 3 Status Update since our the Security Council. Its signature events will focus Sanctions Committee. January Forecast on climate change and COVID-19. The high-level Regarding the Middle East, there will be the 4 Central African meeting on security risks in climate-vulnerable monthly meeting on developments in Yemen, as Republic contexts is expected to be chaired by UK Prime well as a briefing by the chair of the 2140 Yemen 6 COVID-19 Minister Boris Johnson. The COVID-19 meeting Sanctions Committee. The renewal of Yemen will focus on equitable access to vaccines, especially financial and travel ban sanctions and the mandate 7 Syria in conflict-affected areas; UK Foreign Secretary of the Yemen Panel of Experts is also anticipated. 9 Myanmar Dominic Raab is expected to chair. Other Middle East issues that will be 10 Sudan There will also be a briefing on the threat considered include: 12 Counter-Terrorism posed by the Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant • Iraq, update on UNAMI and on the missing and the Secretary-General’s twelfth strategic-level Kuwaiti and third-country nationals and 13 Yemen report on this issue. missing Kuwaiti property, including the 14 Iraq Several meetings are planned on Somalia. The national archives; 16 Somalia Council will receive a briefing on developments • The Middle East, including the Palestinian 17 Haiti in Somalia and the UN Assistance Mission in Question, the monthly briefing; and 19 Climate Change and Somalia (UNSOM).
    [Show full text]