DOCSLIB.ORG

“TWENTY-FOUR VILLAGES' PATOIS” Sogpho Tibetan Is A

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
“TWENTY-FOUR VILLAGES' PATOIS” Sogpho Tibetan Is A DIALECTAL PARTICULARITIES OF SOGPHO TIBETAN – AN INTRODUCTION TO THE “TWENTY-FOUR VILLAGES’ PATOIS” HIROYUKI SUZUKI 1. INTRODUCTION Sogpho Tibetan is a Khams Tibetan variety spoken in Danba County in western Sichuan, China, a region that borders the Tibetan and rGyalrong speaking area and Han China. This paper explores the phonological system and provides an analysis of its peculiar phonetic and lexical features.1 1.1. Location and cultural background Danba County is one of the most eastern counties in Ganzi Prefecture, western Sichuan, China. This place is traditionally populated by rGyal- rong Tibetans, who consider it to be a central spiritual area, where the holy mountain Moerduo [dMu-rdo] lies. The Tibetans in Danba call themselves rGyalrong, and their culture, traditions, and heritage are, in fact, similar to those of other rGyalrong people who speak rGyalrong languages.2 The architectural heritage treated in Darragon (2005) clearly indicates some common traits be- tween the rGyalrong and eastern Khams areas, including Danba. 1.2. Languages spoken in Danba The linguistic situation in Danba can best be described as quite com- plex, since five different languages are spoken by the Tibetan commu- nities of the area: – Khams Tibetan (see 1.3) – Amdo Tibetan, spoken in the nomadic area – Geshitsa, spoken along the Geshiza River, in Niega and Bawang 3 and other villages 1 All data concerning Sogpho Tibetan were collected by the author. 2 For detailed information, see Yang (2005). 3 See rDo-rje (1998) for a comprehensive description of this language. 56 HIRUYUKI SUZUKI – Situ-rGyalrong, spoken in Badi and Taipingqiao villages, among others – Chinese (as a regional common language) 1.3. “Twenty-four villages’ patois” “Twenty-four villages’ patois” is the local name for a Khams Tibetan dialect group in Danba. This variety is spoken in several villages, such as Suopo (Sog-pho), Gezong (dGu-rdzong), Zhonglu (sPro-snang), Zhanggu (Rong-mi Brag-’go), and Shuizi (Rwa-tso), all located at the headwaters of Daduhe River. This speech form is an isolated Khams Tibetan dialect, surrounded by Situ-rGyalrong to the north and the east, Geshitsa to the west and Guiqiong to the south. According to the local Tibetans, the dialect con- sists of several subdialects, which can be identified according to their location along the river and mountains, namely, Sogpho, dGudzong, sProsnang and Rwatso. While these subdialects differ only minimally at the grammatical level, there are much greater differences at the pho- netic level.4 The speakers of this dialect group only use their native dialect in their own villages, while they use Chinese in other Danba villages on account of the linguistically intricate situation mentioned above. Danba Xianzhi (1996: 174) presents a short description of the “Twenty-four villages’ patois”, but few linguistic studies have so far been produced. Suzuki (2005b) provides us with the first preliminary description of the phonological system of Sogpho Tibetan. 2. PHONOLOGICAL SYSTEM 2.1. Tone Sogpho shows a five-way distinction in word tone. The following phonemic signs will be used at the beginning of a word: Ú : high level [] : rising [] A : rising-falling [] B : low level [] C : falling [] 4 For example, the systematic preservation of the glide /r/ corresponding to ra- btags in sProsnang Tibetan only, and a particular sound change in vowel quality attested only in dGudzong Tibetan. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: a Dialect of Amdo Tibetan Spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Prometheus-Academic Collections Asian and African Languages and Linguistics No.11, 2017 Vocabulary of Shingnyag Tibetan: A Dialect of Amdo Tibetan Spoken in Lhagang, Khams Minyag Suzuki, Hiroyuki IKOS, Universitetet i Oslo / National Museum of Ethnology Sonam Wangmo IKOS, Universitetet i Oslo Lhagang Town, located in Kangding Municipality, Ganzi Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China, is inhabited by many Tibetan pastoralists speaking varieties which are similar to Amdo Tibetan even though it is located at the Minyag Rabgang region of Khams, based on the Tibetan traditional geography. Among the multiple varieties spoken by inhabitants living in Lhagang Town, the Shingyag dialect is spoken in the south-western part of the town. It is somewhat different from other Amdo varieties spoken in Lhagang Town in the phonetic and phonological aspects. This article provides a word list with ca. 1500 words of Shingnyag Tibetan. Keywords: Amdo Tibetan, Minyag Rabgang, dialectology, migration pattern 1. Introduction 2. Phonological overview of Shingnyag Tibetan 3. Principal phonological features of Shingnyag Tibetan 1. Introduction This article aims to provide a word list (including ca. 1500 entries) with a phonological sketch of Shingnyag Tibetan, spoken in Xiya [Shing-nyag]1 Hamlet, located in the south-western part of Tagong [lHa-sgang] Town (henceforth Lhagang Town), Kangding [Dar-mdo] Municipality, Ganzi [dKar-mdzes] Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan Province, China (see Figure 1). Lhagang Town is in the easternmost part of Khams based on the traditional Tibetan geography, however, it is inhabited by many Tibetans whose mother tongue is Amdo Tibetan.2 Referring to Qu and Jin (1981), we can see that it is already known that Amdo-speaking Tibetans live in Suzuki, Hiroyuki and Sonam Wangmo.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibetan Vwa 'Fox' and the Sound Change Tibeto
    Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area Volume 29.2 — October 2006 TIBETAN VWA ‘FOX’ AND THE SOUND CHANGE TIBETO-BURMAN *WA > TIBETAN O Nathan W. Hill Harvard University Paul Benedict (1972: 34) proposed that Tibeto-Burman medial *-wa- regularly leads to -o- in Old Tibetan, but that initial *wa did not undergo this change. Because Old Tibetan has no initial w-, and several genuine words have the rhyme -wa, this proposal cannot be accepted. In particular, the intial of the Old Tibetan word vwa ‘fox’ is v- and not w-. འ Keywords: Old Tibetan, Tibeto-Burman, phonology. 1. INTRODUCTION The Tibetan word vwa ‘fox’ has received a certain amount of attention for being an exception to the theory that Tibeto-Burman *wa yields o in Tibetan1. The first formulation of this sound law known to me is Laufer’s statement “Das Barmanische besitzt nämlich häufig die Verbindung w+a, der ein tibetisches [sic] o oder u entspricht [Burmese namely frequently has the combination w+a, which corresponds to a Tibetan o or u]” (Laufer 1898/1899: part III, 224; 1976: 120). Laufer’s generalization was based in turn upon cognate sets assembled by Bernard Houghton (1898). Concerning this sound change, in his 1972 monograph, Paul Benedict writes: “Tibetan has initial w- only in the words wa ‘gutter’, wa ‘fox’ and 1 Here I follow the Wylie system of Tibetan transliteration with the exception that the letter (erroneously called a-chung by some) is written in the Chinese fashion འ as <v> rather than the confusing <’>. On the value of Written Tibetan v as [ɣ] cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax by Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, Eds.; Reviewed by Elena Bashir
    HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies Volume 31 Number 1 Article 21 8-1-2012 Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax by Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, Eds.; Reviewed by Elena Bashir Elena Bashir University of Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya Recommended Citation Bashir, Elena. 2012. Himalayan Languages and Linguistics: Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax by Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler, Eds.; Reviewed by Elena Bashir. HIMALAYA 31(1). Available at: https://digitalcommons.macalester.edu/himalaya/vol31/iss1/21 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. This Review is brought to you for free and open access by the DigitalCommons@Macalester College at DigitalCommons@Macalester College. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIMALAYA, the Journal of the Association for Nepal and Himalayan Studies by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Macalester College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Part II, Helen Plaisier’s article, “A key to four HIMALAYAN LANGUAGES transcription systems of Lepcha” (13 pp.), compares transcription systems proposed by four scholars, including AND LINGUISTICS: STUDIES herself, and argues that her own system “offers the user the most accurate way of transcribing Lepcha. The transliteration IN PHONOLOGY, SEMANTICS, is consistent with and faithful to the way text is written in the traditional Lepcha orthography, so it remains possible at all times to derive the original spelling from the transliteration” MORPHOLOGY AND SYNTAX (p. 51). Y ARK URIN AND ETTINA EISLER Hiroyuki Suzuki’s paper is on “Dialectal particularities B M T B Z , of Sogpho Tibetan - an introduction to the “Twenty-four EDS.
    [Show full text]
  • A Grammar of Bao'an Tu, a Mongolic Language Of
    A GRAMMAR OF BAO’AN TU, A MONGOLIC LANGUAGE OF NORTHWEST CHINA by Robert Wayne Fried June 1, 2010 A dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Buffalo, State University of New York in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Linguistics UMI Number: 3407976 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI 3407976 Copyright 2010 by ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This edition of the work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, MI 48106-1346 Copyright by Robert Wayne Fried 2010 ii Acknowledgements I wish to express my deepest gratitude to my advisor, Matthew Dryer for his guidance and for his detailed comments on numerous drafts of this dissertation. I would also like to thank my committee members, Karin Michelson and Robert VanValin, Jr., for their patience, flexibility, and helpful feedback. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to be a part of the linguistics department at the University at Buffalo. I have benefited in ways too numerous to recount from my interactions with the UB linguistics faculty and with my fellow graduate students. I am also grateful for the tireless help of Carole Orsolitz, Jodi Reiner, and Sharon Sell, without whose help I could not have successfully navigated a study program spanning nine years and multiple international locations.
    [Show full text]
  • ICLDC Handout
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by ScholarSpace at University of Hawai'i at Manoa 3rd ICLDC March 2nd, 2013 The impact of dialectal variation on documentation and conservation work: The view from Amdo Tibetan Zoe Tribur University of Oregon Summary For researchers interested in exploring questions of typology and linguistic universals, documentation of dialects provides priceless data, but such problems as what features constitute a dialect and who speaks it complicate the task of identifying and collecting data, especially for dialects that are low prestige or are only spoken by diglossic speakers. The field researcher must be alert to the possible existence of such forms and be aware of the issues associated with them. For the conservationist, the linguist’s instinct is to argue that dialects should be preserved as part of the community’s heritage, as well as having value in their own right, but individuals struggling to reverse language shift may feel that the reduction of diversity is a necessary step toward ensuring the survival of the language for future generations. However, the selection of a “standard” form can be problematic, sometimes resulting in conflict within the community or, more seriously, causing some speakers to be excluded from conservation efforts altogether. It behooves the field linguist to be aware of community attitudes toward diversity and to try to understand how diversity impacts language use within the community. Two varieties of Amdo Tibetan: Gro.Tshang and mGo.Log Spoken by an estimated 1.5 million people, Amdo Tibetan does not fit the profile of a typical endangered language.
    [Show full text]
  • Himalayan Languages and Linguistics Copyright © 2011
    Himalayan Languages and Linguistics Copyright © 2011. BRILL. All rights reserved. © 2011. BRILL. All Copyright Himalayan Languages and Linguistics : Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, BRILL, 2011. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ubc/detail.action?docID=737786. Created from ubc on 2018-10-08 17:34:10. Brill’s Tibetan Studies Library Edited by Henk Blezer Alex McKay Charles Ramble Languages of the Greater Himalayan Region Edited by George L. Van Driem VOLUME 5/12 Copyright © 2011. BRILL. All rights reserved. © 2011. BRILL. All Copyright Himalayan Languages and Linguistics : Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, BRILL, 2011. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ubc/detail.action?docID=737786. Created from ubc on 2018-10-08 17:34:10. Himalayan Languages and Linguistics Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax Edited by Mark Turin and Bettina Zeisler Copyright © 2011. BRILL. All rights reserved. © 2011. BRILL. All Copyright LEIDEN • BOSTON 2011 Himalayan Languages and Linguistics : Studies in Phonology, Semantics, Morphology and Syntax, BRILL, 2011. ProQuest Ebook Central, http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/ubc/detail.action?docID=737786. Created from ubc on 2018-10-08 17:34:10. This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data ISSN 1568-6183 ISBN 978 90 04 19448 9 Copyright 2011 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphonologicalhistoryofamdotib
    Bulletin of SOAS, 79, 2 (2016), 347–374. Ⓒ SOAS, University of London, 2016. doi:10.1017/S0041977X16000070 A Phonological History of Amdo Tibetan Rhymes* Xun G (author's draft) Centre de recherches linguistiques sur l'Asie orientale INALCO/CNRS/EHESS [email protected] Abstract In this study, a reconstruction is offered for the phonetic evolution of rhymes from Old Tibetan to modern-day Amdo Tibetan dialects. e rel- evant sound changes are proposed, along with their relative chronological precedence and the dating of some speci�c changes. Most interestingly, although Amdo Tibetan, identically to its ancestor Old Tibetan, does not have phonemic length, this study shows that Amdo Tibetan derives from an intermediate stage which, like many other Tibetan dialects, does make the distinction. 1 Introduction Amdo Tibetan, a dialect complex of closely related Tibetan varieties spoken in the Chinese provinces of Qinghai, Gansu and Sichuan, is, demographically, linguisti- cally and culturally, one of the most important dialects of Tibetan. e historical phonology of syllable onsets of Amdo Tibetan is well studied (Róna-Tas, 1966; Sun, 1987), notably for its fascinating retentions and innovations of the complex consonant clusters of Old Tibetan (OT). e rhymes (syllable nuclei and coda) have received less attention. *is work is related to the research strand PPC2 Evolutionary approaches to phonology: New goals and new methods (in diachrony and panchrony) of the Labex EFL (funded by the ANR/CGI). I would like to thank Guillaume Jacques and two anonymous reviewers for various suggestions which resulted in a more readable and better-argued paper. 1 is study aims to reconstruct the phonetic evolution of rhymes from Old Ti- betan1 to modern-day Amdo Tibetan dialects.
    [Show full text]
  • Studies on Ethnic Groups in China
    Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page i studies on ethnic groups in china Stevan Harrell, Editor Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page ii studies on ethnic groups in china Cultural Encounters on China’s Ethnic Frontiers Edited by Stevan Harrell Guest People: Hakka Identity in China and Abroad Edited by Nicole Constable Familiar Strangers: A History of Muslims in Northwest China Jonathan N. Lipman Lessons in Being Chinese: Minority Education and Ethnic Identity in Southwest China Mette Halskov Hansen Manchus and Han: Ethnic Relations and Political Power in Late Qing and Early Republican China, 1861–1928 Edward J. M. Rhoads Ways of Being Ethnic in Southwest China Stevan Harrell Governing China’s Multiethnic Frontiers Edited by Morris Rossabi On the Margins of Tibet: Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/4/05 4:10 PM Page iii ON THE MARGINS OF TIBET Cultural Survival on the Sino-Tibetan Frontier Åshild Kolås and Monika P. Thowsen UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON PRESS Seattle and London Kolas&Thowsen, Margins 1/7/05 12:47 PM Page iv this publication was supported in part by the donald r. ellegood international publications endowment. Copyright © 2005 by the University of Washington Press Printed in United States of America Designed by Pamela Canell 12 11 10 09 08 07 06 05 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be repro- duced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any infor- mation storage or retrieval system, without permission in writ- ing from the publisher.
    [Show full text]
  • Tibet's Minority Languages-Diversity and Endangerment
    Tibet’s minority languages: Diversity and endangerment Short title: Tibet’s minority languages Authors: GERALD ROCHE (Asia Institute, University of Melbourne, [email protected])* HIROYUKI SUZUKI (IKOS, University of Oslo, [email protected]) Abstract Asia is the world’s most linguistically diverse continent, and its diversity largely conforms to established global patterns that correlate linguistic diversity with biodiversity, latitude, and topography. However, one Asian region stands out as an anomaly in these patterns—Tibet, which is often portrayed as linguistically homogenous. A growing body of research now suggests that Tibet is linguistically diverse. In this article, we examine this literature in an attempt to quantify Tibet’s linguistic diversity. We focus on the minority languages of Tibet—languages that are neither Chinese nor Tibetan. We provide five different estimates of how many minority languages are spoken in Tibet. We also interrogate these sources for clues about language endangerment among Tibet’s minority languages, and propose a sociolinguistic categorization of Tibet’s minority languages that enables broad patterns of language endangerment to be perceived. Appendices include lists of the languages identified in each of our five estimates, along with references to key sources on each language. Our survey found that as many as 60 minority languages may be spoken in Tibet, and that the majority of these languages are endangered to some degree. We hope out contribution inspires further research into the predicament of Tibet’s minority languages, and helps support community efforts to maintain and revitalize these languages. NB: This is the post-review version of the paper submitted to the journal Modern Asian Studies, accepted for publication in June 2016, to appear in late 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract a Geographic Analysis of The
    ABSTRACT A GEOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF THE VULNERABILITIES AND COPING STRATEGIES OF TIBETAN HERDERS IN GANSU, CHINA by Luci Xi Lu A dominant narrative of rangeland degradation in western China is that degradation is caused by overstocking and poor land use practices. Consequently, the state has designed and implemented a series of grassland policies (e.g., privatizing common grazing land, depopulating livestock, and relocating herders) in pastoral regions of China. Although the government sees communal rangeland management as inefficient and unsustainable, collective rangeland management persists. Using Machu County in Gansu Province as a case study, I examined the differences between de jure and de facto land tenure on eastern Tibetan Plateau. This study employed semi-structured interviews and extensive participant observation with 43 Amdo Tibetan herders in Machu County, Gansu province, Western China. I also triangulated the first-hand empirical data with the secondary data I obtained from Bureau of Poverty Alleviation and Bureau of Animal Husbandry in Machu. Research findings show that instead of herding individually and maximizing the economic benefit, the majority of herders are pooling resources communally in kin-based encampments in order to avoid risks. Because of the spatio- temporal variation of precipitation, certain encampments perceive themselves more vulnerable to water shortage and topography-related hazards. Renting pastures and seeking alternative livelihoods then become the key strategies for herders to restore mobility and
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary Thoughts on Polysemic Space in Amdo Oral Tradition
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Kobe City University of Foreign Studies Institutional Repository 神戸市外国語大学 学術情報リポジトリ Narrating the Land: Preliminary Thoughts on Polysemic Space in Amdo Oral Tradition 著者 Punzi Valentina journal or Journal of Research Institute : Historical publication title Development of the Tibetan Languages volume 51 page range 407-419 year 2014-03-01 URL http://id.nii.ac.jp/1085/00001794/ Creative Commons : 表示 - 非営利 - 改変禁止 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.ja Narrating the Land: Preliminary Thoughts on Polysemic Space in Amdo Oral Tradition Valentina Punzi L’Orientale University of Naples / Minzu University of China Orality and alternative discourses: telling lha sgrung and ‘narrated geographies’ in contemporary Amdo Oral narrations lay at the shifting intersection between subjective expression and shared culture. As far as the process of narrating implies a constant negotiation between individual intentions and cultural elaboration, the created narratives express individual creativity, while maintaining those culturally relevant traits that effectively link the narration to its social context. Built upon cultural subjectivity, oral narrations are both forms for producing meaning and cultural tools for processing experience.1 Thus, they provide valuable resources for gaining insights into the self-perception of a community and into specific representations of collective memory pertaining to beliefs and cultural practices along with neglected pieces of history, ethno taxonomies and folk etymologies of toponyms. This paper attempts a preliminary exploration of the entangled relationship between oral tradition, especially lha sgrung narration,2 and space in the present socio-political context of Amdo.
    [Show full text]
  • Amdo Tibetan Media Intelligibility
    DigitalResources Electronic Survey Report 2012-019 ® Amdo Tibetan Media Intelligibility R. Jeffrey Green Amdo Tibetan Media Intelligibility R. Jeffrey Green SIL International ® 2012 SIL Electronic Survey Report 2012-019, May 2012 Copyright © 2012 R. Jeffrey Green and SIL International ® All rights reserved 2 Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Amdo Tibetan 1.2 Media Amdo Tibetan 1.3 Ethnic and language contact in the Amdo region 1.4 Previous research 2 Purpose of the survey 3 Methodology 3.1 Site selection 3.2 Instruments 3.3 Subject selection 3.4 Fieldwork timeline 3.5 Analysis 4 Results 4.1 Sample population 4.2 Language attitudes 4.3 Comprehension 4.3.1 High Media AT 4.3.2 Mid-level Media AT 4.3.3 Low Media AT 5 Conclusions 6 Recommendations Appendix A: Sociolinguistic questionnaire Appendix B: Recorded texts References List of Figures Figure 1. Mid-level Media AT RTT scores vs. High Media AT RTT scores Figure 2. High Media AT RTT scores vs. education Figure 3. Mid-level Media AT RTT scores vs. education and gender Figure 4. Mid-level Media AT RTT scores vs. age for North Nomad subjects Figure 5. Scores on Low Media AT RTT vs. education, gender, and age Figure 6. Scores on Low Media AT RTT vs. education and gender Figure 7. Sociolinguistic questionnaire, page 1 Figure 8. Sociolinguistic questionnaire, page 2 Figure 9. Post-RTT questionnaire List of Maps Map 1. The Amdo region Map 2. Amdo dialects 3 List of Tables Table 1. Fieldwork locations Table 2. Sampling strata Table 3. Fieldwork schedule Table 4.
    [Show full text]