DOCSLIB.ORG

Ground Counts for Medium to Large Mammals in Lake Mburo National Park

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ground Counts for Medium to Large Mammals in Lake Mburo National Park GROUND COUNTS FOR MEDIUM TO LARGE MAMMALS -LAKE MBURO NATIONAL PARK- 2018 GROUND COUNTS for Medium to Large Mammals in Lake Mburo Conservation Area Report by F. E. Kisame, F. Wanyama, E. Buhanga and A. Rwetsiba Uganda Wildlife Authority 2018 I UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT I 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1. CONSERVATION HISTORY OF LAKE MBURO II 1.1.1. Pre 1935: The Nkore kingdom ii 1.1.2. 1935 to 1964: Controlled Hunting Areas ii 1.1.3. 1964 to 1986: Lake Mburo Game Reserve ii 1.1.4. Lake Mburo National Park ii 1.1.5. 1987- Today: Lake Mburo National Park 1 1.2. MAMMAL SPECIES THAT HAVE SINCE DISAPPEARED IN LMNP 1 1.3. HUMAN POPULATION 2 1.4. WILD ANIMAL POPULATIONS AND SURVEYS 2 1.5. OBJECTIVES FOR THE SURVEY; 3 2.0 SURVEY AREA AND METHODS 2.1. METHODS 4 2.1.1. Foot -transect survey 4 2.1.1.1. Survey design 4 2.1.1.2. Data collection 4 2.1.2. Road counts 5 2.1.3. Hippopotamus count 5 3.0 RESULTS 6 3.1. MAMMAL POPULATION ESTIMATES IN LMNP AND THE RANCHES 6 3.1.1. Estimated Population Combined for LMNP and Ranches 6 3.1.2. Estimated Population in Lake Mburo National Park. 7 3.1.3. Estimated Population in the Ranches 7 3.2. ROAD COUNT ENCOUNTERS 8 3.2.1. Road Verses Transect abundance estimates 9 3.3. HIPPOPOTAMUS SURVEY IN LAKE MBURO WITHIN LMNP 9 3.4. MAMMAL STRUCTURE 10 3.4.1. Mammal structure in Lake Mburo National Park (Block 1) 10 3.4.2. Mammal structure in the ranches (Block 2 and 3 Combined) 11 3.5. DISTRIBUTION 11 3.5.1. Distribution of mammals in LMNP and the ranches outside the park 11 3.5.2. Carcass encounters and their distribution in LMNP and the ranches 14 3.5.2.1. Carcass distribution in LMNP and the Ranches 16 3.5.3. Cattle in Lake Mburo National Park 17 3.5.4. Poaching in the ranches adjacent to Lake Mburo National Park 17 GROUND COUNTS FOR MEDIUM TO LARGE MAMMALS -LAKE MBURO NATIONAL PARK- 2018 5.0 CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.0 REFERENCES 22 7.0 APPENDICES 23 7.5.1. Appendix I. Some of the survey team members 23 7.5.2. Appendix II: One of the training sessions before the census 23 7.5.3. Appendix III: Some of the teams practicing use of GPS during the training 24 7.5.4. Appendix IV: Briefing teams at the end of the training 24 FIGURES Figure 1. Ground survey map for LMCA (November, 2016) 4 Figure 2. Species encounter rate during road counts in Lake Mburo National Park. 8 Figure 3. A regression for species encounters on road and transect counts 9 Figure 4. Estimated Hippopotamus population trends in Lake Mburo (2009-2016) 9 Figure 5. Mammal structure in Lake mburo National Park 10 Figure 6. Mammal structure in the ranches (Block 2 and 3 Combined) 11 Figure 7. Distribution of Buffalo, bushbuck, eland and impala in LMNP and ranches 12 Figure 8. Distribution of Bush duiker, baboon, topi and oribi in LMNP and ranches 13 Figure 9. Distribution of Reedbuck, warthog, zebra and waterbuck in LMNP and ranches 14 Figure 10. Carcass encounters in Lake Mburo National Park and the ranches 15 Figure 11. Carcasses of Zebra, buffalo, impala, waterbuck and warthog in LMNP and the ranches 16 Figure 12. Cattle distribution during the survey in LMNP 17 Figure 13. Poacher arrested with nets and a bushbuck carcass. 17 Figure 14. Species population estimates for 2014 and 2016 in LMNP 18 Figure 15. Cattle in one of the containment areas (Kraal) in LMNP 20 TABLES Table 1: Total population estimates for wild animals in LMNP and the ranches (Nov, 2016) 6 Table 2: Total population estimates for wild animals in LMNP and the ranches (August 2014) 6 Table 3: Population estimates for wild animals in LMNP (November, 2016) 7 Table 4: Population estimates for wild animals in the ranches (November, 2016) 7 Table 5: Species encounters during the road count 8 PLATES Plate 1. Survey team during the boat census in Lake Mburo National Park 5 UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY ABSTRACT Lake Mburo National Park is an important biodiversity area with a large number of animals that currently survive in a habitat dominated by the invasive acacia woodland. The survey was to generate information on the population of medium to large mammals as well as their distribution patterns in LMNP and the ranches. This was to allow for further assessment of the effectiveness of current conservation strategies in LMCA. The survey was a ground count carried out towards the end of the dry season in November 2016. The transects used during the survey were designed using programme DISTANCE. The analysis of the results was done using by program DISTANCE also. The survey results showed that the Impala were the dominant mammal species in Lake Mburo landscape with a population of (21,240) individuals followed by zebra (19,589), waterbuck (4,983), warthog (3,083), eland (1,482), buffalo (1,479), bushbuck (1,239) and topi (515) in the order of reducing species population. We recorded 271 Hip- popotamus on lake mburo also. The adult females were more than the adult males in the mburo landscape. The Linear Regression Analysis showed a very strong relationship (R2=80.6%) between the population values for mammals obtained using transects during ground counts and the mammal encounter values obtained through a road count. On the other hand, Lake Mburo National Park had the highest number of mammal carcasses with carcasses of Impala, zebra, waterbuck, buffalo, warthog and hippopotamus being recorded whereas, the only carcass recorded in the ranches was for a zebra in block 2-the ranch. We arrested some individuals suspected to be poachers after they were found with hunting nets and a bushbuck carcass later recorded at police as exhibits. The change in the survey design from a low sampling intensity to a high sampling intensity provided better ground information on species numbers. As a result more species sightings were made than in earlier surveys due to change in the sampling intensity. There is need to encourage conservation management enterprises that improve relations with the communities and minimize human-wildlife conflicts. There is need for translocation of zebras and impala from the ranches to other protected areas such as, Pian Upe and Katonga Wildlife Reserves to increase their potential as well as minimizing the human-wildlife conflicts being caused by the zebras and impalas in the ranches. There is need to construct more water holes/dams that can store water long enough while ensuring adequate water supply at all times within the park. To improve the wildlife habitat, there is need to prioritize invasive species management. i GROUND COUNTS FOR MEDIUM TO LARGE MAMMALS -LAKE MBURO NATIONAL PARK- 2018 1.0 BACKGROUND 1.1. CONSERVATION HISTORY OF LAKE MBURO Lake Mburo and its surrounding country side form part of an important conservation area. Over the years this area has been through many traumatic changes and the extent of the land under formal protection decreased dramatically. Wildlife and human numbers fluctuated significantly as a result of natural growth, disease, civil war and political unrest and many of the challenges facing the park today arose from issues that occurred during this troubled history. 1.1.1. PRE 1935: THE NKORE KINGDOM Traditionally this entire area, from Tanzania in the south to the Katonga River in the north, was the territory of the Banyankole people and was ruled over by the Omuabe, the king. Access to the Nshaara area around the lakes and swamps was restricted by the king and people were only allowed to live here or graze their cattle here with his special permission. Whilst wildlife was protected, carnivores such as lions and leopards which attacked livestock were killed. At the turn of the century the area was struck by rinderpest and smallpox and many people, livestock and wildlife died. 1.1.2. 1935 TO 1964: CONTROLLED HUNTING AREAS Throughout the early part of the 20th century the area slowly recovered and wildlife populations increased again. Human settlement escalated and hunting became a popular past time amongst the wealthy and influential. In 1935 in order to-protect the game the protectorate Government declared two adjoining controlled Hunting Areas, lake Mburo and Masha. Although hunting was regulated in these areas, grazing, farming and fishing was allowed to continue as before. In the 1940’s, a second disaster struck with a wave of sleeping sickness and Nagana carried by tsetse fly. Many people left the area with their cattle, leaving behind only a few farmers and fishermen. The tsetse fly eradication programme which followed, drastically reduced game populations. 1.1.3. 1964 TO 1986: LAKE MBURO GAME RESERVE By the 1960’s the tsetse fly eradication programme was complete opening up the area to cattle once again. The consequent increase in use and settlement by farmers and pastoralists prompted the newly independent gov- ernment to rationalize land use. The area was divided into a commercial cattle ranching scheme to the north and the lake Mburo Game Reserve to the south. The Masha Controlled Hunting Area, which was by now well populated, was degazetted. Families living within the reserve were permitted to remain and farm, but pastoralists displaced by the ranching scheme joined the increasing numbers of farmers entering the poorly controlled reserve. In 1969, a large block of land was cut from the reserve to form the Nshaara Dairy Cross Breeding Ranch.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Important Bird Areas in Uganda. Status and Trends 2008
    IMPORTANT BIRD AREAS IN UGANDA Status and Trends 2008 NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Important Bird Areas in Uganda Status and Trends 2008 Compiled by: Michael Opige Odull and Achilles Byaruhanga Edited by: Ambrose R. B Mugisha and Julius Arinaitwe Map illustrations by: David Mushabe Graphic designs by: Some Graphics Ltd January 2009 Reproduction of this publication for educational or other non commercial purposes is authorized without further written permission from the copyright holder provided the source is fully acknowledged. Production of this publication for resale or other commercial purposes is prohibited without prior written notice of the copyright holder. Citation: NatureUganda (2009). Important Bird Areas in Uganda, Status and Trends 2008. Copyright © NatureUganda – The East Africa Natural History Society About NatureUganda NatureUganda is a Non Governmental Organization working towards the conservation of species, sites and habitats not only for birds but other taxa too. It is the BirdLife partner in Uganda and a member of IUCN. The organization is involved in various research, conservation and advocacy work in many sites across the country. These three pillars are achieved through conservation projects, environmental education programmes and community involvement in conservation among others. All is aimed at promoting the understanding, appreciation and conservation of nature. For more information please contact: NatureUganda The East Africa Natural History Society Plot 83 Tufnell Drive, Kamwokya. P.O.Box 27034, Kampala Uganda Email [email protected] Website: www.natureuganda.org DISCLAIMER This status report has been produced with financial assistance of the European Union (EuropeAid/ ENV/2007/132-278. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of Birdlife International and can under no normal circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the European Union.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 Days Uganda Gorilla Trekking Experience
    5 Days Uganda Gorilla Trekking Experience Safari Itinerary Day One: Kampala – Lake Mburo National Park Meet and greet will be at 0600hrs at your hotel before departing Kampala. Drive west with a brief stop at the Equator for some ‘was at the Equator’ memorable photo moments. Your drive continues to Lake Mburo National Park. Arrive is in time for lunch at your lodge and a short rest. Enjoy the afternoon boat ride on Lake Mburo. This is the most popular activity in Lake Mburo National Park. The boat ride provides great opportunity to observe mighty hippo and crocodile populations. Water bird species are often too numerous for the keenest birder to identify all. Lake Mburo National Park supports over 350 bird species including rare but regularly seen species like African fin foot and white-backed heron. The rarely seen Papyrus Gonolek may come to the edge of the papyrus if called using a recorded bird call. Other species in Lake Mburo include African fish eagles, Narina Trogon, Ross’s Turaco, African green- pigeon and the Bare-Faced Go-Away-bird among others. You will have a great experience coupled with stunning scenery and panoramic landscape views that will impress upon you true African beauty. Later take a sundown game-drive to end your day in an adventurous style. You will be searching for zebra, impala, eland, buffalo, oribi, Defassa waterbuck, leopard, hippo, hyena, topi and reedbuck. You will drive back for dinner and overnight at your preferred accommodation. (Transit Time: 5hrs.) Day Two: Lake Mburo - Bwindi Impenetrable National Park Wake up to the rhythm of nature.
    [Show full text]
  • Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda
    Nationally Threatened Species for Uganda National Red List for Uganda for the following Taxa: Mammals, Birds, Reptiles, Amphibians, Butterflies, Dragonflies and Vascular Plants JANUARY 2016 1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The research team and authors of the Uganda Redlist comprised of Sarah Prinsloo, Dr AJ Plumptre and Sam Ayebare of the Wildlife Conservation Society, together with the taxonomic specialists Dr Robert Kityo, Dr Mathias Behangana, Dr Perpetra Akite, Hamlet Mugabe, and Ben Kirunda and Dr Viola Clausnitzer. The Uganda Redlist has been a collaboration beween many individuals and institutions and these have been detailed in the relevant sections, or within the three workshop reports attached in the annexes. We would like to thank all these contributors, especially the Government of Uganda through its officers from Ugandan Wildlife Authority and National Environment Management Authority who have assisted the process. The Wildlife Conservation Society would like to make a special acknowledgement of Tullow Uganda Oil Pty, who in the face of limited biodiversity knowledge in the country, and specifically in their area of operation in the Albertine Graben, agreed to fund the research and production of the Uganda Redlist and this report on the Nationally Threatened Species of Uganda. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS PREAMBLE .......................................................................................................................................... 4 BACKGROUND ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Excursions Organised for Sunday, 13 November 2005
    9th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) Wetlands and Water: supporting life, sustaining livelihoods Kampala, Uganda, 8-15 November 2005 Excursions organised for Sunday, 13 November 2005 On Sunday 13 November 2005, there are no scheduled work sessions as the Secretariat prepares final versions of the draft Resolutions, and delegates will be free to visit one or more places of interest, including Ramsar sites and potential sites to be included in the Ramsar list of Wetlands of International Importance. As the time of the COP approaches, more information about these excursions, including registration forms, maps, itineraries and points of interest, will be available on the Wetlands Inspection Division Web site: http://www.ugandawetlands.org/cop9. Below is a brief description of some of the sites to be visited. 1. Nakivubo wetland, the floodplain for the main storm water channel draining the city of Kampala, is on the fringes of Lake Victoria in Murchison Bay. Nakivubo wetland plays an important role in tertiary treatment of waste water and purification of storm water, thereby maintaining water quality in the bay that supplies piped water to the city. The wetland has come under great pressure and is heavily encroached upon by coco yam cultivation and human settlements. This was the first wetland reserve to be gazetted in Uganda. 2. Mabamba Bay is an extensive marsh fringed with papyrus near the main body of Lake Victoria. This is the closest site to Kampala with Shoebill and Papyrus Gonolek. Migrant species such as Gull-billed Terns, Grey-headed Gulls, White-winged Terns and Blue Swallows are also present.
    [Show full text]
  • Estimating Population Sizes of Lions Panthera Leo and Spotted Hyaenas Crocuta Crocuta in Uganda’S Savannah Parks, Using Lure Count Methods
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by St Andrews Research Repository Estimating population sizes of lions Panthera leo and spotted hyaenas Crocuta crocuta in Uganda’s savannah parks, using lure count methods E DWARD O KOT O MOYA,TUTILO M UDUMBA,STEPHEN T. BUCKLAND,PAUL M ULONDO and A NDREW J. PLUMPTRE Abstract Despite .60 years of conservation in Uganda’s but the medium-to-large ungulates of open country that national parks the populations of lions and spotted hyaenas constitute the major prey of lions are usually estimated with in these areas have never been estimated using a census reasonable accuracy (Schaller, 1972; Hunter, 1998; Hayward method. Estimates for some sites have been extrapolated to & Kerley, 2005), making prey counts an attractive option. other protected areas and educated guesses have been made Developing consistent and reliable methods for estimating but there has been nothing more definitive. We used a lure population density is pivotal for many studies in animal count analysis method of call-up counts to estimate popu- ecology as well as for efficient population assessment and lations of the lion Panthera leo and spotted hyaena Crocuta allocation of conservation effort (Dacier et al., 2011). crocuta in the parks where reasonable numbers of these Survey methods developed to estimate the population species exist: Queen Elizabeth Protected Area, Murchison density of African lions include roar counts, individual iden- Falls Conservation Area and Kidepo Valley National Park. tification, and mark–recapture methods (Ogutu & Dublin, We estimated a total of 408 lions and 324 hyaenas for these 1998; IUCN, 2007).
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda Wildlife Authority Tariff of July 2020 to June 2022
    UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY CONSERVATION TARIFF JULY 2020 TO JUNE 2022 CONSERVATION TARIFF 2020-2022 PARK RULES AND REGULATIONS Do not camp or make campfires except at designated sites. Do not drive off the tracks. Do not disturb wildlife by sounding motor horns. Do not drive in the park between 7:00pm and 7:00 am. Do not bring dogs or other pets into the park. Do not litter. Do not bring firearms or ammunition into the park. Do not pick flowers or destroy any vegetation. Do not exceed the speed limit of 40km per hour (25mph). Retain all official receipts for inspection. GORILLA TRACKING RULES BEFORE YOU SET OUT: Do not visit the gorillas if you have a cold or other infectious illness. Minimum age for tracking is 15 years Human waste should be buried 30cm (12”) deep Maximum number of visitors is eight persons per gorilla group WHEN YOU ARE WITH THE GORILLAS: Maintain a 7m (21ft) distance from the gorilla Smoking, eating and drinking are not permitted on the tour If you must sneeze or cough cover your face and turn away from the gorillas, as they can catch coughs and colds from humans Visits are limited to one hour per gorilla group per day Do not use flash photography. ii UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY CONTENTS Abbreviations: ..................................................................................................... 2 Park entrance fees............................................................................................. 3 Annual park entrance passes ........................................................................ 3 Vehicle,
    [Show full text]
  • Uganda 14.2.-6.3.2014
    Uganda 14.2.-6.3.2014 Michael Kessler Zurich, Switzerland [email protected] This report provides details on the mammals seen during a botanical expedition to the forest reserves of southwestern Uganda. Most of our time was spent noisily sampling plants in the forest, which was not conductive to observing mammals. Thus mammals watching was restricted to a few half days specifically dedicated to this (incl. guided chimpanzee and gorilla tracking), early morning or late afternoons around some lodges, and chance observations during field work. Also, we only had two nocturnal activities (a guided night walk in KNP and a guided night drive in LMNP). Likewise, no small mammals or bats were trapped. That we nevertheless saw 49 identifiable mammal species is a testament to the diversity and abundance of mammals in Uganda, although I was shocked by the degree of habitat destruction outside of the reserves. Our ground arrangements were organized by Tinkerbird Tours (www.tinkerbirdtours.com), whose owner and head guide Emmy Gongo is an amazing birding guide and also very knowledgeable with mammals and great at finding them. Highly recommended! For taxonomy of ungulates and primates, I follow the Handbook of the Mammals of the World. Itinerary 13.2.: Early morning arrival in Entebbe airport; rest of day devoted to burocratical meetings in Kampala. 14.2.: Morning drive from Entebbe to Mabamba Swamp, boat ride in the papyrus swamps looking for Shoebill (not seen), then on to Kibale National Park (KNP). 15.-16.2.: Two full days of field work in KNP, with one morning devoted to chimpanzee tracking (150 US $ p.p.).
    [Show full text]
  • Conflicting Land Use in and Around Lake Mburo National Park, Sanga Sub-County, Mbarara District Jim Ayorekire
    Conflicting land use in and around lake Mburo national park, Sanga sub-county, Mbarara District Jim Ayorekire To cite this version: Jim Ayorekire. Conflicting land use in and around lake Mburo national park, Sanga sub-county, Mbarara District. Economics and Finance. 1999. dumas-01277799 HAL Id: dumas-01277799 https://dumas.ccsd.cnrs.fr/dumas-01277799 Submitted on 23 Feb 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. APPENDIXVII MAKERERE UNIVERSiTY K.wipAa t'nd Phonc - Cblcs 'MAKUNIKA I)EPARTf\ I FN'l' OF GEOGRAPHY ''"U I<Ci ()tr }(t TO WHOM TO CONCERN - I I Date ........... Dear S;r, Mr., kxs., 0r., i€ is a Master of Arts Land Use and Rural Dev .opment degree student. For the pirposes of fufi.11ing part of the course requirements, the bearer has to submit a researched thesis. Hence the need to collect information/data for his/her thesis. Your assistance in providing him/her with the necessary information will be highly appreciated. Yours sincerely, •/ i?1 Dr. Hannington Sengendo, Ag. Head, Geography Department. ':. CONFLICTING LND USE U AND AROUND LAKE MBURO NATIONAL PARK, SANGA SUB- COUNTY, MBARARA DISTRiCT.
    [Show full text]
  • Prey Preferences of the Persian Leopard and Trophic Competition with Human Hunters in Iran’
    PREY PREFERENCES OF THE PERSIAN LEOPARD AND TROPHIC COMPETITION WITH HUMAN HUNTERS IN IRAN Dissertation for the award of the degree “Doctor of Philosophy” (Ph.D. Division of Mathematics and Natural Sciences) of the Georg-August-Universität Göttingen within the doctoral program: Biodiversity and Ecology submitted by M.Sc. & DIC Arash Ghoddousi from Tehran (Iran) Göttingen, 2016 “Gedruckt bzw. veröffentlicht mit Unterstützung des Deutschen Akademischen Austauschdienstes” 2 Thesis Committee PD Dr. Matthias Waltert (Dept. of Animal Ecology | Workgroup on Endangered Species) Prof. Dr. Michael Mühlenberg (Dept. of Animal Ecology | Workgroup on Endangered Species) Prof. Dr. Niko Balkenhol (Dept. Wildlife Sciences) Members of the Examination Board PD Dr. Matthias Waltert (Dept. of Animal Ecology | Workgroup on Endangered Species) Prof. Dr. Michael Mühlenberg (Dept. of Animal Ecology | Workgroup on Endangered Species) Prof. Dr. Niko Balkenhol (Dept. Wildlife Sciences) Prof. Dr. Erwin Bergmeier (Dept. of Vegetation and Phytodiversity Analysis) Prof. Dr. Eckhard W. Heymann (Dept. Sociobiology/Anthropology) PD Dr. Sven Bradler (Dept. of Morphology, Systematic & Evolution) Date of the oral examination: 24.08.2016 3 Golestan National Park 4 Table of contents Summary ........................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 1: General Introduction .................................................................................. 12 1.1. Poaching as a global threat to biodiversity
    [Show full text]
  • 4/25/2011 1 Case Study on Pes Focusing on Collaborative
    4/25/2011 CASE STUDY ON PES FOCUSING ON COLLABORATIVE FOREST MANAGEMENT AND REVENUE SHARING PROGRAMMES FRANCIS OGWAL – NRMS (B&R) – NEMA TOM RUKUNDO - NFA PRESENTED AT THE TRAINING WORKSHOP ON PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 8 APRIL 2011, KOLPING HOTEL, HOIMA 1 BRIEF ABOUT UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORIY • Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) was established in 1996 by the Uganda Wildlife Act Cap 200 (of 1996), which merged the former Uganda National Parks and the Game Department. • The Uganda Wildlife Act provides for sustainable management of wildlife. • The mission of UWA is to conserve, economically develop and sustainably manage the wildlife and Protected Areas of Uganda in partnership with neighboring communities and other stakeholders for the benefit of the people of Uganda and the global community • UWA manages 1o National Parks and 12 Wildlife Reserves 4/25/2011 1 4/25/2011 UWA Protected Areas Kidepo Valley NP East Madi WR â Arua Matheniko WR Ajai WR â Gulu Bokora WR â Murchison Falls NP Moroto â Lira Karuma WR Pian Upe WR Bugungu WR Soâ roti Kabwoya WR P N i Mbale ik â ul m Mt. Elgon NP e S Toro-Semliki WR â P â N Tororo s. Jinja t Kibale NP â M Kampala N i â or nz e Katonga WR w Entebbe W E R â S Kyambura WR Masaka Queen Elizabeth NP â â Lake Mburo NP Kigezi WR Bwindi Impenetrable NP 100 0 100 200 300 Kilometers âKabale Mgahinga Gorilla NP • COMMUNITY CONSERVATION WORK BY UWA Is the involvement of local people for joint responsibility and benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Gorilla Safari Uganda – 4 Days
    GORILLA SAFARI UGANDA – 4 DAYS Unforgettable encounter with the endangered Mountain Gorillas of Uganda! Day 1 Kampala - Bwindi National Park (9-10 hours) Very early in the morning we leave Kampala for a long journey towards the western part of Uganda. It is a full day drive but via a scenic route. On our way we will pass the Equator where you may take a photo or shop for a souvenir. After lunch in the town of Mbarara, enjoy a scenic drive through the verdant countryside. You will pass traditional homesteads and villages, waving children and wonderful views of the countryside and mountains. (L-D) Day 2 Gorilla Tracking The highlight of your safari: a meeting with the gentle giants of Bwindi! Tracking the gorillas may take from an hour to eight hours depending on where the gorillas are on each particular day. But the long trek will definitely be worthwhile as you observe the gorilla family closely while they eat, play and rest. A unique and unforgettable experience! For conservation purposes, time spent with the gorillas is limited to one hour. The ranger guide always briefs you on how to behave with these giant apes. (B-L-D) Day 3 Bwindi - Lake Mburo National Park (5 hours) After breakfast we depart the impenetrable forest of Bwindi and head to Lake Mburo National Park. As we enter the park it is likely that you will spot some wildlife – Zebra, topi, impala, waterbuck, oribi, eland, buffalo, hippo, warthogs and crocodile. Check into your lodge and after lunch depart for a boat trip on Lake Mburo and enjoy the rich and varied bird life and the many hippos that are cooling off.
    [Show full text]