Convergent Evolution of Caffeine in Plants by Co-Option of Exapted Ancestral Enzymes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Convergent Evolution of Caffeine in Plants by Co-Option of Exapted Ancestral Enzymes Convergent evolution of caffeine in plants by co-option of exapted ancestral enzymes Ruiqi Huanga, Andrew J. O’Donnella,1, Jessica J. Barbolinea, and Todd J. Barkmana,2 aDepartment of Biological Sciences, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 Edited by Ian T. Baldwin, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany, and approved July 18, 2016 (received for review March 25, 2016) Convergent evolution is a process that has occurred throughout the the evolutionary gain of traits such as caffeine that are formed via tree of life, but the historical genetic and biochemical context a multistep pathway. First, although convergently co-opted genes, promoting the repeated independent origins of a trait is rarely such as XMT or CS, may evolve to encode enzymes for the same understood. The well-known stimulant caffeine, and its xanthine biosynthetic pathway, it is unknown what ancestral functions they alkaloid precursors, has evolved multiple times in flowering plant historically provided that allowed for their maintenance over mil- history for various roles in plant defense and pollination. We have lions of years of divergence. Second, it is unknown how multiple shown that convergent caffeine production, surprisingly, has protein components are evolutionarily assembled into an ordered, evolved by two previously unknown biochemical pathways in functional pathway like that for caffeine biosynthesis. Under the chocolate, citrus, and guaraná plants using either caffeine synthase- cumulative hypothesis (26), it is predicted that enzymes catalyzing or xanthine methyltransferase-like enzymes. However, the pathway earlier reactions of a pathway must evolve first; otherwise, enzymes and enzyme lineage used by any given plant species is not predict- that perform later reactions would have no substrates with which to able from phylogenetic relatedness alone. Ancestral sequence res- react. Subsequently, duplication of the gene encoding the first urrection reveals that this convergence was facilitated by co-option enzyme would give rise to enzymes catalyzing later steps. This of genes maintained over 100 million y for alternative biochemical hypothesis assumes that, initially, the intermediates in a pathway roles. The ancient enzymes of the Citrus lineage were exapted for are advantageous, because it is unlikely that multiple enzymatic reactions currently used for various steps of caffeine biosynthesis steps in a pathway could evolve simultaneously. Alternatively, the and required very few mutations to acquire modern-day enzymatic retrograde hypothesis (27) states that enzymes catalyzing reactions EVOLUTION characteristics, allowing for the evolution of a complete pathway. that occur at the end of a pathway evolved first. Gene duplication Future studies aimed at manipulating caffeine content of plants will of the sequence encoding the first-evolved enzyme would eventu- require the use of different approaches given the metabolic and ally result in new enzymes that perform the preceding pathway genetic diversity revealed by this study. steps. This hypothesis assumes that the intermediates of a given pathway would be produced nonenzymatically and be available for convergent evolution | caffeine biosynthesis | enzyme evolution | catalysis; as such, it may have less general explanatory application. paleomolecular biology Finally, the patchwork hypothesis (28, 29) explains the origins of novel pathways by the recruitment of enzymes from alternative onvergent evolution has resulted in the independent origins of preexisting pathways. This hypothesis assumes that the older, Cmany traits dispersed throughout the tree of life. Whereas some recruited enzymes were ancestrally promiscuous with respect to the convergent traits are known to be generated via similar develop- substrates catalyzed such that they were exapted for the activities mental or biochemical pathways, others arise from different paths that they later become specialized for in the novel pathway. Unlike (1–5). Likewise, similar (orthologous) or different (paralogous or the cumulative and retrograde hypotheses, there is no prediction even unrelated) genes may encode for the regulatory or structural for the relative ages of enzymes performing each step of the novel proteins composing the components of pathways that build conver- pathway under the patchwork hypothesis. The patchwork hypoth- gent traits (6–10). One of the most prominent examples of conver- esis is compatible with the innovation, amplification, and duplication gence in plants is that of caffeine biosynthesis, which appears to have evolved at least five times during flowering plant history (11). The Significance phylogenetic distribution of caffeine, or xanthine alkaloids more generally, is highly sporadic and usually restricted to only a few Convergent evolution is responsible for generating similar traits in species within a given genus (12, 13). Caffeine accumulates in various unrelated organisms, such as wings that allow flight in birds and tissues, where it may deter herbivory (14, 15) or enhance pollinator bats. In plants, one of the most prominent examples of convergence memory (16). Numerous studies over the past 30 y have indicated is that of caffeine production, which has independently evolved in that although several possible routes exist, the same canonical numerous species. In this study, we reveal that even though the pathway to caffeine biosynthesis has evolved independently in Coffea caffeine molecule is identical in the cacao, citrus, guaraná, coffee, (coffee) and Camellia (tea) involving three methylation reactions to and tea lineages, it is produced by different, previously unknown, sequentially convert xanthosine to 7-methylxanthine to theobromine biosynthetic pathways. Furthermore, by resurrecting extinct en- to caffeine (Fig. 1) (17, 18). In Coffea, three xanthine methyl- zymes that ancient plants once possessed, we show that the novel transferase (XMT)-type enzymes from the SABATH (salicylic acid, pathways would have evolved rapidly because the ancestral en- benzoic acid, theobromine methyltransferase) family (19) are used to zymes were co-opted from previous biochemical roles to those of catalyze the methylation steps of the pathway, whereas Camellia uses caffeine biosynthesis for which they were already primed. a paralogous, convergently evolved caffeine synthase (CS)-type en- zyme (20–22) (Fig. 1). Because most SABATH enzymes catalyze the Author contributions: R.H., A.J.O., J.J.B., and T.J.B. designed research; R.H., A.J.O., and J.J.B. methylation of oxygen atoms of a wide diversity of carboxylic acids performed research; R.H., A.J.O., J.J.B., and T.J.B. analyzed data; and T.J.B. wrote the paper. such as anthranilic, benzoic, gibberellic, jasmonic, loganic, salicylic, The authors declare no conflict of interest. and indole-3-acetic acid for floral scent, defense, and hormone This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. modulation (23–25), methylation of xanthine alkaloid nitrogen atoms 1Present address: Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, 07745 Jena, Germany. by XMT and CS is likely a recently evolved activity. 2To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. Although convergence has been documented at multiple hier- This article contains supporting information online at www.pnas.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10. archical levels, fundamental questions remain unanswered about 1073/pnas.1602575113/-/DCSupplemental. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1602575113 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 23, 2021 O O that the relative methylation preferences of these enzymes, al- CH3 H C 3 H3C though similar, have convergently evolved in Theobroma and N N N N Paullinia, likely after gene duplication independently occurred in O N NH O N N each lineage (Fig. 2 B and C and Fig. S1). No enzymes have been O H H 1-methylxanthine Paraxanthine previously reported to specialize in the methylation of xanthine or HN N [1X] [PX] 1 7 3-methylxanthine, and the biochemical route to caffeine implied by 3 O O O O N NH CH3 these enzyme activities (Fig. 2 B and C) has not been implicated as H N H3C H3C N Xanthine HN N N N the primary pathway in these or any other plants. However, there is [X] evidence for this pathway in Theobroma fruits and leaves from O N NH O N NH O N N metabolomic analyses and radiolabeled tracer studies that showed O CH3 CH3 CH3 3-methylxanthine Theophylline Caffeine 3-methylxanthine as an intermediate formed during theobromine HN N [3X] [TP] [CF] 1 7 accumulation when xanthine or various purine bases and nucleo- 3 O N O O N CH3 CH3 sides are provided as substrates (34, 35). Analyses of fruit and leaf H Ribose HN N HN N Xanthosine extracts and isotope tracer studies also report the accumulation of [XR] N O N O N N Coffea: CaDXMT 7-methylxanthine to a lesser extent (34, 35). Our liquid chroma- H Camellia: TCS1 Coffea: CaXMT CH3 tography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) results indicate that this 7-methylxanthine Theobromine [7X] [TB] metabolite can be formed by methylation of xanthine by TcCS2 as a Coffea: CaMXMT Camellia: TCS1 secondaryactivity(Fig.2B and Fig. S3). Thus, in Theobroma,itis possible that theobromine is produced via methylation of this in- Fig. 1. Caffeine biosynthetic network has 12 potential paths. The only path termediate by BTS (36) and/or TcCS1 (Fig. 2B), in addition to characterized from plants is shown by solid black arrows and involves sequential 3-methylxanthine by TcCS2 (Fig. 2B). It is not yet clear which enzyme methylation of
Recommended publications
  • SCH 58261: a Potent and Selective Non-Xanthine A2A Adenosine Receptor Antagonist
    22 DIRECTED DRUG DISCOVERY™ LIGAND-SETS™ for Assay Validation and High Throughput Screening Easy-to-use collections of pharmacologically-similar, small organic ligands Sigma-RBI LIGAND-SETS™ are a convenient and affordable way to screen a specific target with a collection of well- characterized, pharmacologically-active compounds. Each LIGAND-SET™ contains 40-80 high purity (>96%), small organic ligands arranged by pharmacological class in a 96-well format, one compound (2 mg) per well (1 ml capacity). N Standardize/validate new screening assays with well-characterized ligands N Guide secondary screening of larger, diverse libraries using pharmaceutically-relevant structures N Screen new drug targets for leads with pharmacologically-active compounds Nine different LIGAND-SETS™ are now available: N Adrenergics (Prod. No. L 0383) N Enzyme Inhibitors (Prod. No. L 6787) N Purines/Pyrimidines (Prod. No. L 2538) N Cholinergics (Prod. No. L 2663) N GABAergics (Prod. No. L 7884) N Glutamatergics (Prod. No. L 6537) N Dopaminergics (Prod. No. L 6412) N Ion Channel Modulators (Prod. No. L 6912) N Serotonergics (Prod. No. L 6662) For further information, please visit our Drug Discovery website at sigma-aldrich.com/drugdiscovery Technical information for each compound is provided in standard SD file format for use with ISIS/Base or other compatible software (software not provided). SCH 58261: A potent and selective non-xanthine A2A adenosine receptor antagonist Vol. 19 No. 4 Vol. Adenosine (Prod. No. A 9251) acts as a modulator of [3]. These results suggest a neuroprotective effect of this neuronal activity through its interaction with four receptor compound. In another study, the role of A1 and A2A subtypes referred to as A1, A2A, A2B and A3.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Theophylline and Enprofylline on Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness
    Thorax: first published as 10.1136/thx.44.12.1022 on 1 December 1989. Downloaded from Thorax 1989;44:1022-1026 Effect of theophylline and enprofylline on bronchial hyperresponsiveness G H KOETER, J KRAAN, M BOORSMA, J H G JONKMAN, TH W VAN DER MARK From the Department ofPulmonology and Lung Function, University Hospital, Groningen; Pharma Bio Research, Assen; and Astra Pharmaceutica, Rijswijk, The Netherlands ABSTRACT The effect of increasing intravenous doses of theophylline and enprofylline, a new xanthine derivative, on bronchial responsiveness to methacholine was studied in eight asthmatic patients. Methacholine provocations were carried out on three days before and after increasing doses of theophylline, enprofylline, and placebo, a double blind study design being used. Methacholine responsiveness was determined as the provocative concentration of methacholine causing a fall of 20% in FEV, (PC20). The patients were characterised pharmacokinetically before the main study to provide an individual dosage scheme for each patient that would provide rapid steady state plasma concentration plateaus of 5, 10, and 15 mg/l for theophylline and 1 25, 2 5, and 3-75 mg/l for enprofylline. Dose increments in the main study were given at 90 minute intervals. FEV, showed a small progressive decrease after placebo; it remained high in relation to placebo after both drugs and this effect was dose related. Methacholine PC20 values decreased after placebo; mean values were (maximum difference 2-0 and 1 7 higher after theophylline and enprofylline than after placebo copyright. doubling doses of methacholine); the effect of both drugs was dose related. Thus enprofylline and theophylline when given intravenously cause a small dose related increase in FEV1 and methacholine PC20 when compared with placebo.
    [Show full text]
  • Pro-Aging Effects of Xanthine Oxidoreductase Products
    antioxidants Review Pro-Aging Effects of Xanthine Oxidoreductase Products , , Maria Giulia Battelli y , Massimo Bortolotti y , Andrea Bolognesi * z and Letizia Polito * z Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine-DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via San Giacomo 14, 40126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (M.G.B.); [email protected] (M.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] (A.B.); [email protected] (L.P.); Tel.: +39-051-20-9-4707 (A.B.); +39-051-20-9-4729 (L.P.) These authors contributed equally. y Co-last authors. z Received: 22 July 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 8 September 2020 Abstract: The senescence process is the result of a series of factors that start from the genetic constitution interacting with epigenetic modifications induced by endogenous and environmental causes and that lead to a progressive deterioration at the cellular and functional levels. One of the main causes of aging is oxidative stress deriving from the imbalance between the production of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen (RNS) species and their scavenging through antioxidants. Xanthine oxidoreductase (XOR) activities produce uric acid, as well as reactive oxygen and nitrogen species, which all may be relevant to such equilibrium. This review analyzes XOR activity through in vitro experiments, animal studies and clinical reports, which highlight the pro-aging effects of XOR products. However, XOR activity contributes to a regular level of ROS and RNS, which appears essential for the proper functioning of many physiological pathways. This discourages the use of therapies with XOR inhibitors, unless symptomatic hyperuricemia is present.
    [Show full text]
  • COPD Agents Review – October 2020 Page 2 | Proprietary Information
    COPD Agents Therapeutic Class Review (TCR) October 1, 2020 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, digital scanning, or via any information storage or retrieval system without the express written consent of Magellan Rx Management. All requests for permission should be mailed to: Magellan Rx Management Attention: Legal Department 6950 Columbia Gateway Drive Columbia, Maryland 21046 The materials contained herein represent the opinions of the collective authors and editors and should not be construed to be the official representation of any professional organization or group, any state Pharmacy and Therapeutics committee, any state Medicaid Agency, or any other clinical committee. This material is not intended to be relied upon as medical advice for specific medical cases and nothing contained herein should be relied upon by any patient, medical professional or layperson seeking information about a specific course of treatment for a specific medical condition. All readers of this material are responsible for independently obtaining medical advice and guidance from their own physician and/or other medical professional in regard to the best course of treatment for their specific medical condition. This publication, inclusive of all forms contained herein, is intended to be educational in nature and is intended to be used for informational purposes only. Send comments and suggestions to [email protected]. October 2020
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen Et Al
    USOO8603526B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,603,526 B2 Tygesen et al. (45) Date of Patent: Dec. 10, 2013 (54) PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITIONS 2008. O152595 A1 6/2008 Emigh et al. RESISTANT TO ABUSE 2008. O166407 A1 7/2008 Shalaby et al. 2008/0299.199 A1 12/2008 Bar-Shalom et al. 2008/0311205 A1 12/2008 Habib et al. (75) Inventors: Peter Holm Tygesen, Smoerum (DK); 2009/0022790 A1 1/2009 Flath et al. Jan Martin Oevergaard, Frederikssund 2010/0203129 A1 8/2010 Andersen et al. (DK); Karsten Lindhardt, Haslev (DK); 2010/0204259 A1 8/2010 Tygesen et al. Louise Inoka Lyhne-versen, Gentofte 2010/0239667 A1 9/2010 Hemmingsen et al. (DK); Martin Rex Olsen, Holbaek 2010, O291205 A1 11/2010 Downie et al. (DK); Anne-Mette Haahr, Birkeroed 2011 O159100 A1 6/2011 Andersen et al. (DK); Jacob Aas Hoellund-Jensen, FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Frederikssund (DK); Pemille Kristine Hoeyrup Hemmingsen, Bagsvaerd DE 20 2006 014131 1, 2007 (DK) EP O435,726 8, 1991 EP O493513 7, 1992 EP O406315 11, 1992 (73) Assignee: Egalet Ltd., London (GB) EP 1213014 6, 2002 WO WO 89,09066 10, 1989 (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this WO WO91,040 15 4f1991 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 WO WO95/22962 8, 1995 U.S.C. 154(b) by 489 days. WO WO99,51208 10, 1999 WO WOOOf 41704 T 2000 WO WO 03/024426 3, 2003 (21) Appl. No.: 12/701,429 WO WOO3,O24429 3, 2003 WO WOO3,O24430 3, 2003 (22) Filed: Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Nouriast Tablets 20 Mg [Non-Proprietary Name] Istradefylline (JAN*) [Applicant] Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd
    Report on the Deliberation Results March 15, 2013 Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [Brand name] Nouriast Tablets 20 mg [Non-proprietary name] Istradefylline (JAN*) [Applicant] Kyowa Hakko Kirin Co., Ltd. [Date of application] March 30, 2012 [Results of deliberation] In the meeting held on March 8, 2013, the First Committee on New Drugs concluded that the product may be approved and that this result should be reported to the Pharmaceutical Affairs Department of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council. The product is not classified as a biological product or a specified biological product, the re-examination period is 8 years, and neither the drug substance nor the drug product is classified as a poisonous drug or a powerful drug. *Japanese Accepted Name (modified INN) This English version of the Japanese review report is intended to be a reference material to provide convenience for users. In the event of inconsistency between the Japanese original and this English translation, the former shall prevail. The PMDA will not be responsible for any consequence resulting from the use of this English version. Review Report February 22, 2013 Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency The results of a regulatory review conducted by the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency on the following pharmaceutical product submitted for registration are as follows. [Brand name] Nouriast Tablets 20 mg [Non-proprietary name] Istradefylline [Name of applicant]
    [Show full text]
  • A 1 Adenosine Receptor Agonists and Antiagonists
    Europaisches Patentamt (19) European Patent Office Office europeenpeen des brevets EP 0 725 782 B1 (12) EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION (45) Date of publication and mention (51) intci.6: C07D 473/08, C07H 19/167, of the grant of the patent: C07D 519/00, A61K 31/52 15.12.1999 Bulletin 1999/50 // (C07D51 9/00, 493:00, 473:00) (21) Application number: 95901070.3 (86) International application number: PCT/US94/12388 (22) Date of filing: 28.10.1994 (87) International publication number: WO 95/11904 (04.05.1995 Gazette 1995/19) (54) A 1 ADENOSINE RECEPTOR AGONISTS AND ANTAGONISTS A1 ADENOSIN REZEPTOR AGONISTEN UND ANTAGONISTEN AGONISTES ET ANTAGONISTES DE RECEPTEURS DE L'ADENOSINE A 1 (84) Designated Contracting States: • SCAMMELLS, Peter, J. AT BE CH DE DK ES FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL Highton, VIC 3216 (AU) PT SE • MILNER, Peter, Gerard Los Altos, CA 94022 (US) (30) Priority: 28.10.1993 US 144459 • PFISTER, Jurg, Roland Los Altos, CA 94024 (US) (43) Date of publication of application: • SCHREINER, George, Frederic 14.08.1996 Bulletin 1996/33 Los Altos, CA 94022 (US) (73) Proprietor: UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA (74) Representative: Perry, Robert Edward RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC. GILL JENNINGS & EVERY Gainesville, FL 32611 (US) Broadgate House 7 Eldon Street (72) Inventors: London EC2M 7LH (GB) • BELARDINELLI, Luiz Gainesville, FL 32605 (US) (56) References cited: • OLSSON, Ray EP-A- 0 374 808 EP-A- 0 415 456 Tampa, FL 33609-3504 (US) WO-A-92/00297 WO-A-94/16702 • BAKER, Stephen DE-A- 4 205 306 US-A- 5 288 721 Gainesville, FL 32607 (US) DO CM 00 Is- lO CM Is- Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice the Patent Office of the Notice of shall be filed in o to European opposition to European patent granted.
    [Show full text]
  • In-Silico Approaches
    molecules Review Recent Developments in New Therapeutic Agents against Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases: In-Silico Approaches Pedro Cruz-Vicente 1,2 , Luís A. Passarinha 1,2,3,* , Samuel Silvestre 1,3,4,* and Eugenia Gallardo 1,3,* 1 CICS-UBI, Health Sciences Research Centre, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001 Covilhã, Portugal; [email protected] 2 UCIBIO—Applied Molecular Biosciences Unit, Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, NOVA University Lisbon, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal 3 Laboratory of Pharmaco-Toxicology—UBIMedical, University of Beira Interior, 6200-001 Covilhã, Portugal 4 CNC—Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, 3004-504 Coimbra, Portugal * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.A.P.); [email protected] (S.S.); [email protected] (E.G.); Tel.: +351-275-329-002/3 (L.A.P. & S.S. & E.G.) Abstract: Neurodegenerative diseases (ND), including Alzheimer’s (AD) and Parkinson’s Disease (PD), are becoming increasingly more common and are recognized as a social problem in modern societies. These disorders are characterized by a progressive neurodegeneration and are considered one of the main causes of disability and mortality worldwide. Currently, there is no existing cure for AD nor PD and the clinically used drugs aim only at symptomatic relief, and are not capable Citation: Cruz-Vicente, P.; of stopping neurodegeneration. Over the last years, several drug candidates reached clinical trials Passarinha, L.A.; Silvestre, S.; phases, but they were suspended, mainly because of the unsatisfactory pharmacological benefits. Gallardo, E. Recent Developments in Recently, the number of compounds developed using in silico approaches has been increasing at New Therapeutic Agents against a promising rate, mainly evaluating the affinity for several macromolecular targets and applying Alzheimer and Parkinson Diseases: filters to exclude compounds with potentially unfavorable pharmacokinetics.
    [Show full text]
  • Methylxanthines and Neurodegenerative Diseases: an Update
    nutrients Review Methylxanthines and Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Update Daniel Janitschke 1,† , Anna A. Lauer 1,†, Cornel M. Bachmann 1, Heike S. Grimm 1, Tobias Hartmann 1,2 and Marcus O. W. Grimm 1,2,* 1 Experimental Neurology, Saarland University, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany; [email protected] (D.J.); [email protected] (A.A.L.); [email protected] (C.M.B.); [email protected] (H.S.G.); [email protected] (T.H.) 2 Deutsches Institut für DemenzPrävention (DIDP), Saarland University, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Methylxanthines (MTX) are purine derived xanthine derivatives. Whereas naturally occurring methylxanthines like caffeine, theophylline or theobromine are widely consumed in food, several synthetic but also non-synthetic methylxanthines are used as pharmaceuticals, in particular in treating airway constrictions. Besides the well-established bronchoprotective effects, methylxanthines are also known to have anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidative properties, mediate changes in lipid homeostasis and have neuroprotective effects. Known molecular mechanisms include adenosine receptor antagonism, phosphodiesterase inhibition, effects on the cholinergic system, wnt signaling, histone deacetylase activation and gene regulation. By affecting several pathways associated with neurodegenerative diseases via different pleiotropic mechanisms and due to its moderate side effects, intake of methylxanthines have been suggested to be an interesting approach in dealing with neurodegeneration. Especially in the past years, the impact of methylxanthines in neurodegenerative diseases has been extensively studied and several new aspects have been elucidated. In this review Citation: Janitschke, D.; Lauer, A.A.; Bachmann, C.M.; Grimm, H.S.; we summarize the findings of methylxanthines linked to Alzheimer´s disease, Parkinson’s disease Hartmann, T.; Grimm, M.O.W.
    [Show full text]
  • V Olume 51 • Issue 2 • a Ugust 2021
    Web ofIndexed Science in Original Articles Anti-proliferative effects of indomethacin, acemetacin and their tromethamine salts in HCT116 human colon cancer cells Gökçe Cihan Üstündağ, Berna Somuncu, Meltem Müftüoğlu, Nilgün Karalı In vitro assessment of cytotoxic, apoptotic and genotoxic effects of metformin Tuba Sarıaydın, Tuğbagül Çal, Sevtap Aydın Dilsiz, Hande Canpınar, Ülkü Ündeğer Bucurgat Nickel oxide nanoparticles induced DNA damages in human liver cells Mahmoud Abudayyak, E. Elif Güzel, Gül Özhan Effects of chlorpyrifos-methyl, chlormequat, deltamethrin, glyphosate, pirimiphos-methyl, tebuconazole and their mixture on oxidative stress and toxicity in HUVEC cell line Çiğdem Sevim, Ali Taghizadehghalehjoughi, Mehtap Kara The effects of prochloraz on the levels of nuclear receptor genes expressions and global DNA methylation in human prostate carcinoma cells Ecem Fatma Karaman, Esma Doğan, Dilara Alga, Sibel Özden Cytotoxicity and DNA protective effects of the Terfezia and Picoa species from the eastern region of Turkey Mehmet Akyüz, Işık Didem Karagöz, Şule İnci, İbrahim Halil Kılıç, Sevda Kırbağ, Başak Simitçioğlu Central possible antinociceptive mechanism of naringin Mehmet Evren Okur, Çinel Köksal Karayıldırım Anti-fertility and antisteroidogenic activity of Clerodendrum serratum in mature male rats Navaneetha Krishnan Subramaniyan, Nagarajan Govinda Rajan, Karthikeyan Elumalai, Sathyanathan Viswanathan, Jayaraman Rajangam, Preeti Gutha, Sivaneswari Srinivasan Curcumin prevents tenofovir/lamivudine/efavirenz-induced nephrotoxicity
    [Show full text]
  • Xanthine (116900) and Oxypurinol (447509) Technical Document
    Xanthine (116900) and Oxypurinol (447509) Technical Document Issued: 4/99 I. Executive Summary A. Identity The manufacturing use product, Xanthine and Oxypurinol Manufacturing Use Concentrate, EPA Registration No. 71144-E contains 50% xanthine (CAS number 69- 89-6) and 50% oxypurinol (CAS number 2465-59-0). The end-use product, EcologixTM Cockroach Bait, EPA Registration No. 71144-R contains 1% xanthine and 1% oxypurinol as its active ingredients. The components of both the manufacturing use and the end use products are adequately identified and the product chemistry data submitted satisfies the requirements for product identity. B. Use / Usage The manufacturing use product (MUP) will be used in the formulation of cockroach baits for commercial and/or domestic indoor use. The end-use product will be used to control cockroaches in commercial, industrial and residential areas. The Agency has classified this use as an indoor non-food use because the active ingredients are formulated into a solid pellet that is enclosed in a bait station and there are no volatile components. The bait use directions state that stations should be placed in areas where cockroaches have been seen and where they hide such as in dark, warm, damp locations near food and water. There are no usage data yet since this is the first registration for this product. Oxypurinol, one of the components of the end-use product and MUP, is a metabolite of the human drug allopurinol (refer to section II (F) for structures) which has been used in the treatment of gout, hematological disorders and in antineoplastic therapy. Xanthine, the other component, is a naturally occurring intermediate in purine metabolism and is found in all living cells and tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • PDL DRUG REVIEW Proprietary Name: Nourianz® Common Name: Istradefylline PDL Category: Anti‐Parkinsonian Drugs
    PDL DRUG REVIEW Proprietary Name: Nourianz® Common Name: istradefylline PDL Category: Anti‐Parkinsonian Drugs Comparable Products Preferred Drug List Status Entacapone Preferred Rasagiline Non‐Preferred Selegiline Preferred Xadago Non‐Preferred Summary Pharmacology/Usage: Istradefylline, the active ingredient of Nourianz®, is an adenosine receptor antagonist, which has a xanthine derivative structure. The mechanism of action by which it exerts its therapeutic effects in Parkinson disease is not known. In in vitro and in vivo animal studies, istradefylline was demonstrated to be an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist. Indication: As adjunctive treatment to levodopa/carbidopa in adult patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing “off” episodes. There is no pregnancy category for this medication; however, the risk summary indicates that there are no adequate data on the developmental risk associated with use in pregnant women. In animal studies, oral administration of istradefylline during pregnancy resulted in teratogenicity at clinically relevant exposures and in the absence of maternal toxicity. The teratogenic effects of istradefylline in pregnant rabbits were substantially greater when given in combination with levodopa/carbidopa than when given alone. Use during pregnancy is not recommended. Women of childbearing potential should be advised to use contraception during treatment with Nourianz®. The safety and efficacy of use in the pediatric population have not been established. Dosage Form: Film‐Coated Tablets: 20mg, 40mg Recommended Dosage: Take 20mg PO QD, and this dose may be increased to a maximum of 40mg QD, based on individual need and tolerability. Initial dose titration is not required and Nourianz® can be taken with or without food. The recommended dose in patients who use tobacco in amounts of 20 or more cigarettes per day (or the equivalent amount of another tobacco product) is 40mg QD.
    [Show full text]