Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited Barclays Capital Citi

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited Barclays Capital Citi OFFERING MEMORANDUM STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited US$500,000,000 6.90% Notes due 2037 Fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior, unsecured and joint and several basis by Xstrata plc, Xstrata (Schweiz) AG and Xstrata Finance (Dubai) Limited. Issue price: 99.687% Interest payable May 15 and November 15 The 6.90% Notes due 2037 (the ‘‘Notes’’) are being offered by Xstrata Finance (Canada) Limited (the ‘‘Issuer’’) (the ‘‘Notes Issue’’). Upon issue, payment of the principal and interest on the Notes will be fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior, unsecured, and joint and several basis by Xstrata plc (‘‘Xstrata’’), Xstrata (Schweiz) AG (‘‘Xstrata Schweiz’’) and Xstrata Finance (Dubai) Limited (‘‘Xstrata Dubai’’ and, together with Xstrata and Xstrata Schweiz, the ‘‘Guarantors’’) pursuant to the guarantees relating to the Notes (the ‘‘Guarantees’’) as set forth in the indenture under which the Notes will be issued (the ‘‘Indenture’’). The Notes and the Guarantees will rank pari passu with all other direct, unsecured and unsubordinated obligations (except for certain limited exceptions and those obligations preferred by statute or operation of law) of the Issuer and the Guarantors, respectively. The Notes are redeemable in whole or in part at any time at the option of the Issuer or the Guarantors at a redemption price equal to the make-whole amounts described in ‘‘Description of the Notes and Guarantees’’. In addition, the Notes are redeemable in whole but not in part at the option of the Issuer upon the occurrence of certain changes in taxation at their principal amount with accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption. The Notes will be issued initially in fully registered form as beneficial interests in Global Notes (as defined in this Offering Memorandum). Except as set forth in this Offering Memorandum, Global Notes will not be exchangeable for Definitive Notes (as defined in this Offering Memorandum). Investing in the Notes involves certain risks. For a discussion of certain factors that should be considered in connection with an investment in the Notes, see ‘‘Risk factors’’. The Notes and the Guarantees have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the ‘‘Securities Act’’), or any state securities laws and are being offered and sold within the United States only to ‘‘qualified institutional buyers’’ (‘‘QIBs’’) as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act (‘‘Rule 144A’’) and outside the United States to persons other than US persons (within the meaning given in Regulation S under the Securities Act (‘‘US persons’’)) in reliance on Regulation S under the Securities Act (‘‘Regulation S’’). The Notes are being offered subject to various conditions and are expected to be delivered on or about November 20, 2007 through the facilities of the Depository Trust Company (‘‘DTC’’) and its participants, including Euroclear Bank, S.A./N.V. as operator of the Euroclear System (‘‘Euroclear’’) and Clearstream Banking, S.A. (‘‘Clearstream’’), against payment in immediately available funds. Joint Book-Running Managers Barclays Capital Citi JPMorgan RBS Greenwich Capital November 13, 2007 No dealer, salesperson or other person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representation not contained in this Offering Memorandum and, if given or made, any such information or representation must not be relied upon as having been authorized by the Issuer or the Guarantors, any of their respective affiliates or the Initial Purchasers. This Offering Memorandum does not constitute an offer of any securities other than those to which it relates or an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy, to any person in any jurisdiction where such an offer or solicitation would be unlawful. Neither the delivery of this Offering Memorandum nor any sale made under it shall, under any circumstances, create any implication that there has been no change in the affairs of the Issuer or the Guarantors since the date of this Offering Memorandum or that the information contained in this Offering Memorandum is correct as at any time subsequent to that date. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Certain US matters ......................................................................... iii Available information ...................................................................... iii Special note regarding forward-looking statements ....................................... iv Enforceability of civil liabilities ............................................................. v Presentation of information ............................................................... v Information incorporated by reference .................................................... xi Summary ................................................................................... 1 Risk factors ................................................................................. 15 Use of proceeds ............................................................................ 34 Capitalization .............................................................................. 35 Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations . 36 Business of the Xstrata Group .............................................................. 137 Management ............................................................................... 261 Significant shareholders .................................................................... 265 Description of other indebtedness ......................................................... 266 Industry overview .......................................................................... 269 Description of the Issuer and the Guarantors .............................................. 274 Description of the Notes and Guarantees .................................................. 276 Book-entry, delivery and form ............................................................. 293 Taxation .................................................................................... 299 Plan of distribution ........................................................................ 306 Transfer restrictions ........................................................................ 311 Validity of the Notes and Guarantees . .................................................... 314 Independent auditors ...................................................................... 314 Annex A: Ore reserves and mineral resources information ................................. 315 Annex B: Definitions and glossary of technical terms ...................................... 336 i This Offering Memorandum is being provided on a confidential basis to QIBs and to certain prospective holders of Notes (‘‘Noteholders’’) outside the United States for use solely in connection with the Notes Issue. Its use for any other purpose is not authorized. This Offering Memorandum may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in part, nor may it be distributed or any of its contents be disclosed to any person other than the prospective Noteholders to whom it is being provided. In making an investment decision, prospective Noteholders must rely on their own examination of the Issuer and the Guarantors and their respective affiliates, the terms of the Notes and the financial information contained in this Offering Memorandum and their own assessment of the merits and risks involved. Prospective Noteholders acknowledge that they have not relied, and will not rely, on the Initial Purchasers in connection with their investigation of the accuracy of any information or their decision to invest in the Notes. The contents of this Offering Memorandum are not to be considered as legal, business, financial, investment or tax advice. Prospective Noteholders should consult their own counsel, accountants and other advisers as to legal, tax, business, financial, investment and related aspects of a purchase of the Notes. Barclays Capital Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc. (each, an ‘‘Initial Purchaser’’ and, together, the ‘‘Initial Purchasers’’) reserve the right to withdraw this Notes Issue at any time and to reject any commitment to subscribe for the Notes, in whole or in part. The Initial Purchasers also reserve the right to allot less than the full amount of the Notes sought by a prospective Noteholder. The Initial Purchasers and certain related entities may acquire a portion of the Notes for their own account. The laws of certain jurisdictions may restrict the distribution of this Offering Memorandum and the offer and sale of the Notes. Persons into whose possession this Offering Memorandum or any of the Notes come must inform themselves about, and observe, any such restrictions. None of the Issuer, the Guarantors, the Initial Purchasers or their respective affiliates or representatives makes any representation to any offeree or any purchaser of the Notes regarding the legality of any investment in the Notes by such offeree or purchaser under applicable investment or similar laws or regulations. For a further description of certain restrictions on the offering and sale of the Notes and the distribution of the document, prospective Noteholders should read ‘‘Plan of distribution’’ and ‘‘Transfer restrictions’’. The Notes have not been and will not be qualified for sale under the securities laws of any province or territory of Canada. The Notes are not being offered for sale
Recommended publications
  • February 2011
    PRICE R60-00 FEBRUARY 2011 Picture by Chief Photographer Duane Daws Picture Supplement FEBRUARY 25, 2011 Rockwell Diamonds, Ventersdorp, Tirisano project PROJECT INDEX INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS 3 Gold 35 Electricity 4 Anglogold Ashanti’s Mponeng Below 120 Level Eskom’s Arnot capacity increase project 5 Phase 2 project 36 Eskom’s Ingula pumped-storage scheme 6 Gold Fields’ South Deep gold mine expansion 37 Eskom’s Kusile power plant project 7 Great Basin Gold’s Burnstone gold project 38 Eskom’s Medupi power station project 8 Rangold Resources’ Tongon gold project 39 Mmamabula energy project 10 Witwatersrand Consolidated Gold Resources’ Renewable energy feed-in tariff programme 11 Bloemhoek gold project 40 Green Building Property Development 12 Iron-ore 41 Absa Towers West office development 13 Assmang’s Khumani iron-ore expansion project 42 Menlyn Maine city precinct 14 Kumba Iron Ore’s Kolomela iron-ore project 44 Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services’ iron fines project 45 Petrochemicals, Oil and Gas 15 PetroSA’s Project Mthombo 16 Other mining sectors 46 Kalagadi Manganese project 47 Transport and Logistics 18 Norilsk Nickel and African Rainbow Minerals’ South African Roads Agency Limited’s Gauteng Nkomati nickel mine phase 2 large-scale mining Freeway Improvement Project 19 expansion project 48 The Gauteng Provincial Government’s Gautrain rapid rail link 20 Platinum 49 Transnet’s new multiproduct pipeline 21 Anglo Platinum’s Thembelani shaft 2 platinum project 50 Anglo Platinum’s Twickenham project 51 Water and Sanitation 22 Anglo Platinum’s
    [Show full text]
  • Inquiry Into Environmental Offsets Submission 75
    Committee Secretary Senate Standing Committees on Environment and Communications PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Phone: +61 2 6277 3526 Fax: +61 2 6277 5818 [email protected] 4th April 2014 http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Environment_and_Communications/Environme ntal_Offsets Terms of Reference 1. That the following matter be referred to the Senate Environment and Communications References Committee for inquiry and report by 16 June 2014: The history, appropriateness and effectiveness of the use of environmental offsets in federal environmental approvals in Australia, including: the principles that underpin the use of offsets; a. the processes used to develop and assess proposed offsets; b. the adequacy of monitoring and evaluation of approved offsets arrangements to determine whether promised environmental outcomes are achieved over the short and long term; and c. any other related matters 2. That in conducting the inquiry the committee consider the terms of reference in (1) with specific regard to, but not restricted to, the following projects in central Queensland in Mackay Conservation Group’s area: a. Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project; p.3 b. North Queensland Bulk Port’s Abbot Point Coal Terminal Capital Dredging Project; p.11 c. Sonoma Coal Mine Coral Creek Expansion and Offset Unlikely to Work; p.13 d. Newlands Wollombi Coal Mines Newland Nature Refuge ; p.13 e. Xstrata’s Rolleston Coal Mine; p.14 2 Case Study 1: Waratah Coal’s Galilee Coal Project: The Legitimacy of Offsetting a Commonwealth listed Nature Refuge Biodiversity offset requirements of the Galilee Coal Project (Northern Export Facility) also referred to as the China First Coal Project, including the development of a Biodiversity Offset Strategy (the Offset Strategy) that assesses the offset requirements at the State and Commonwealth level, identifies an approach for delivery of offsets and analyses potential offset availability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of South African Coal: Market, Investment, and Policy Challenges
    PROGRAM ON ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Working Paper #100 January 2011 THE FUTURE OF SOUTH AFRICAN COAL: MARKET, INVESTMENT, AND POLICY CHALLENGES ANTON EBERHARD FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD) is an international, interdisciplinary program that studies how institutions shape patterns of energy production and use, in turn affecting human welfare and environmental quality. Economic and political incentives and pre-existing legal frameworks and regulatory processes all play crucial roles in determining what technologies and policies are chosen to address current and future energy and environmental challenges. PESD research examines issues including: 1) effective policies for addressing climate change, 2) the role of national oil companies in the world oil market, 3) the emerging global coal market, 4) the world natural gas market with a focus on the impact of unconventional sources, 5) business models for carbon capture and storage, 6) adaptation of wholesale electricity markets to support a low-carbon future, 7) global power sector reform, and 8) how modern energy services can be supplied sustainably to the world’s poorest regions. The Program is part of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. PESD gratefully acknowledges substantial core funding from BP and EPRI. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Encina Hall East, Room E415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu About the Author Anton Eberhard leads the Management Programme in Infrastructure Reform and Regulation at the University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
    [Show full text]
  • Duvha Power Station FFP Retrofit Project: Air Quality Opinion
    Project done for Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd Duvha Power Station FFP Retrofit Project: Air Quality Opinion Report No.: APP/11/ZIC-03 Rev 0 DATE: July 2011 H Liebenberg-Enslin REPORT DETAILS Reference APP/11/ZIC-03 Status Final Report Rev 0 Report Title Duvha Power Station FFP Retrofit Project: Air Quality Opinion Date July 2011 Client Zitholele Consulting (Pty) Ltd Prepared by Hanlie Liebenberg-Enslin, MSc (University of Johannesburg) Airshed Planning Professionals (Pty) Ltd is a consulting company located in Midrand, Notice South Africa, specialising in all aspects of air quality, ranging from nearby neighbourhood concerns to regional air pollution impacts. The company originated in 1990 as Environmental Management Services, which amalgamated with its sister company, Matrix Environmental Consultants, in 2003. Declaration Airshed is an independent consulting firm with no interest in the project other than to fulfil the contract between the client and the consultant for delivery of specialised services as stipulated in the terms of reference. With very few exceptions, the copyright in all text and other matter (including the Copyright Warning manner of presentation) is the exclusive property of Airshed Planning Professionals (Pty) Ltd. It is a criminal offence to reproduce and/or use, without written consent, any matter, technical procedure and/or technique contained in this document. The authors would like to express their appreciation for the discussions and technical Acknowledgements input from Konrad Kruger from Zitholele Consulting and Tobile Bokwe from Eskom. Duvha Power Station FFP Retrofit Project: Air Quality Opinion Report No. APP/11/ZIT-03 Rev 0 Page ii Table of Contents 1 Introduction ...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cipc Publication
    CIPC PUBLICATION 28 October 2013 Publication No. 201340 Notice No. 29 (AR DEREGISTRATIONS) Deregistration of Companies And Close Corporations. Deregistrasie Van Maatskappye en Beslote Koperasies. NOTICE IN TERMS OF SECTION 82 (3) (b) (ii) OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2008, SECTION 26 OF THE CLOSE CORPORATION ACT,1984 AND REGULATION 40 (4) OF THE COMPANIES REGULATIONS 2011, THAT AFTER EXPIRATION OF 20 BUSINESS DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PUBLICATION OF THIS NOTICE, THE NAMES OF THE COMPANIES AND CLOSE CORPORATIONS MENTIONED IN B LIST HEREUNDER WILL, UNLESS CAUSE IS SHOWN TO THE CONTRARY, BE STRUCK OFF THE REGISTER AND THE REGISTRATION OF THE CORRESPONDING MOI OR FOUNDING STATEMENT CANCELLED. KENNISGEWING INGEVOLGE ARTIKEL 82 (3) (b) (ii) VAN DIE MAATSKAPPYWET,2008, ARTIKEL 26 VAN DIE BESLOTE KOPERASIES,1984 DAT NA AFLOOP VAN 20 BESIGHEIDSDAE VANAF PUBLIKASIE VAN HIERDIE KENNISGEWING, DIE NAME VAN DIE MAATSKAPPYE EN BESLOTE KOPERASIES IN LYS B HIERONDER GENOEM, VAN DIE REGISTER GESKRAP EN DIE BETROKKE AKTE OF STIGTINGSVERKLARING GEKANSELLEER SAL WORD, TENSY GRONDE DAARTEEN AANGEVOER WORD.
    [Show full text]
  • Timbuckleyieefa DIRTY POWER BIG COAL's NETWORK of INFLUENCE OVER the COALITION GOVERNMENT CONTENTS
    ICAC investigation: Lobbying, Access and Influence (Op Eclipse) Submission 2 From: Tim Buckley To: Lobbying Subject: THE REGULATION OF LOBBYING, ACCESS AND INFLUENCE IN NSW: A CHANCE TO HAVE YOUR SAY Date: Thursday, 16 May 2019 2:01:39 PM Attachments: Mav2019-GPAP-Dirtv-Power-Report.Ddf Good afternoon I am delighted that the NSW ICAC is looking again into the issue of lobbying and undue access by lobbyists representing self-serving, private special interest groups, and the associated lack of transparency. This is most needed when it relates to the private (often private, foreign tax haven based entities with zero transparency or accountability), use of public assets. IEEFA works in the public interest analysis relating to the energy-fmance-climate space, and so we regularly see the impact of the fossil fuel sector in particular as one that thrives on the ability to privatise the gains for utilising one-time use public assets and in doing so, externalising the costs onto the NSW community. This process is constantly repeated. The community costs, be they in relation to air, particulate and carbon pollution, plus the use of public water, and failure to rehabilitate sites post mining, brings a lasting community cost, particularly in the area of public health costs. The cost-benefit analysis presented to the IPC is prepared by the proponent, who has an ability to present biased self-serving analysis that understates the costs and overstates the benefits. To my understanding, the revolving door of regulators, politicians, fossil fuel companies and their lobbyists is corrosive to our democracy, undermining integrity and fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • Establishment of Emission Characteristics, Emission Factors and Health Risk Assessment from a Coal-Fired Power Plant
    ESTABLISHMENT OF EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, EMISSION FACTORS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FROM A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT MUTAHHARAH BINTI MOHD MOKHTAR UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA i ESTABLISHMENT OF EMISSION CHARACTERISTICS, EMISSION FACTORS AND HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT FROM A COAL-FIRED POWER PLANT MUTAHHARAH BINTI MOHD MOKHTAR A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the award of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Environmental Engineering) Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia NOVEMBER 2016 iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I thank Allah s.w.t for giving me the courage and strength to endure all the troubles in completing this thesis and for showing me the way when I was stuck for ideas. My sincere appreciation goes to my supervisor Dr Mimi Haryani bt Hassim and co-supervisor Prof. Dr Mohd Rozainee bin Taib for their support, guidance and valuable idea to make this research possible. Plenty of thanks to Dr Mimi Haryani bt Hassim for your continuous guidance and encouragement in my research paper publication. Special thanks to Prof. Dr Mohd Rozainee bin Taib for the valuable work skills that you instil in me, which very much facilitate the completion of this thesis. I am very grateful to Mr Lim Sze Fook and Dr Casey Ngo Saik Peng for their willingness and time to guide me in AERMOD modelling and knowledge sharing of power plant operation. I am also very grateful to Mr Mohd Azri bin Mohd Salleh for helping me to gain better understanding of the stack sampling procedures and laboratory analysis. Your kindness will always be remembered.
    [Show full text]
  • ATMOSPHERIC IMPACT REPORT in Support of Eskom's Application for a Variation Request of the Atmospheric Emission Licence
    ATMOSPHERIC IMPACT REPORT In support of Eskom’s application for a variation request of the Atmospheric Emission Licence for Duvha Power Station uMoya -NILU Consulting (Pty) Ltd Eskom PReport O Box issued 20622 by PReport O Box issued 1091 to Durban North, 4016 Johannesburg, 2001 South Africa South Africa M Zunckel A Raghunandan January 2014 i This report has been produced for Eskom by uMoya-NILU Consulting (Pty) Ltd. The intellectual property contained in this report remains vested in uMoya-NILU Consulting (Pty) Ltd. No part of the report may be reproduced in any manner without written permission from uMoya-NILU Consulting (Pty) Ltd and Eskom. When used in a reference this document should be cited as follows: uMoya-NILU (2014): Atmospheric Impact Report in support of Eskom’s application for a variation request of the Minimum Emission Standards compliance timeframes for the Duvha Power Station, Report No. uMN002-14, January 2014. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Eskom’s coal-fired Duvha Power Station in Mpumalanga Province has a base generation capacity of 3 600 MW. The purpose of this Atmospheric Impact Report (AIR) is to assess the impact of the grace period of 37 days per year requested by Eskom from the particulate emission limit stipulated in Duvha’s Atmospheric Emission Licence for human health and the environment. Two operational scenarios are assessed to determine the effect of the grace period for Duvha Power Station. The application for the grace period considers PM10 emissions only. The two scenarios are: Scenario 1: Current particulate emission limits stipulated in the Atmospheric Emission Licence to assess the relative contribution to ambient PM10 concentrations near the Duvha Power Station.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidetoallphotographs
    Historical Papers Research Archive, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg G U I D E T O A L L P H O T O G R A P H S (Including an INDEX following the listing) Copyright: Historical Papers Research Archive, University of the Witwatersrand Library 1 This Guide incorporates material from the general Historical Papers collections and the archive of the Anglican Church in Southern Africa. The listing is followed by an INDEX. The descriptions include albums, scrapbooks, loose prints, negatives, slides, postcards, some posters, sketches and paintings, and images on glass or metal plates. Most of the items were received with collections of documents, others are photographic collections. A1 HOFMEYR, Jan Hendrik, 1894 – 1948 Gf1 Hofmeyr Gf1.1 Album of photographs 1 vol. 1947 Taken during the visit of Hofmeyr as Minister of Mines for the"Cutting of the First Sod Ceremony, Freddies North Lease Area Ltd and Freddies South Lease Area Ltd", O.F.S., 11 Jul.1947 Gf1.2 Mounted Gf1.2.1 Hofmeyr as a boy of about 12, with cat on shoulder Gf1.2.2 Hofmeyr as a young man Gf1.2.3. Hofmeyr, with mother, and two others, unidentified Gf1.2.4 Hofmeyr, being presented with the volume of the Hebrew "Thesaurus" by Leon Feldberg Gf1.2.5 Hofmeyr, in group Gf1.3 Loose 9 items Undated Gf1.3.1 Taken at home, including one with cat, and one of his mother 6 items Gf1.3.2 with two young ladies 3 items Gf2 Other Gf2.1 Identified Gf2.1.1 S.A.Morrison, Dec.1927 Gf2.1.2 Ronald S.Dewar, Xmas 1936 Gf2.1.3 G.Kramer, 9 Nov.1940 Gf2.1.4 Edwin Swales, June 1941 Gf2.1.5 Leif Egeland and wife, 5 Feb.1944 Gf2.1.6 Visit of Royal Family to Cape Town, 1947 3 items Gf2.1.7 General Smuts, Undated Gf2.1.8 Copy of portrait of C.N.de Wet Gf2.1.9 Copy of effigy of Paul Kruger Gf2.1.10 Boys Camp, Undated 24 items Gf2.2 Unidentified 16 items Kd1-8.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Draft Access Undertaking Volume 3: Maximum Allowable Revenue and Reference Tariffs
    30 April 2013 2013 Draft Access Undertaking Volume 3: Maximum Allowable Revenue and Reference Tariffs Contents 1 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................18 2 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE REVENUE AND REFERENCE TARIFFS ......................................19 2.1 UT4 volume forecasts.......................................................................................................20 2.2 Summary of proposed MAR for UT4 ...............................................................................21 2.3 Summary of reference tariffs ...........................................................................................23 2.4 Key drivers of UT4 tariffs .................................................................................................30 2.5 Relativity of proposed UT4 tariffs to other industry cost drivers ................................32 3 OPENING ASSET VALUE........................................................................................................34 3.1 Process..............................................................................................................................34 3.2 Matters impacting the value of the RAB .........................................................................34 3.3 Summary of UT3 roll-forward ..........................................................................................37 3.4 UT4: Opening Asset Values.............................................................................................38
    [Show full text]
  • Dewatering and Drying of Fine Coal to a Saleable Product
    COALTECH 2020 Task 4.8.1 Dewatering and drying of fine coal to a saleable product by P.E. Hand, Isandla Coal Consulting cc. March 2000 Copyright COALTECH 2020 This document is for the use of COALTECH 2020 only, and may not be transmitted to any other party, in whole or in part, in any form without the written permission of COALTECH. Table of contents Index ........................................................................................................................................ 2 1 Foreword ........................................................................................................................... 8 2 Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 Definitions .................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Problem statement ................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Basic Economics ...................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Arising Slimes .................................................................................................. 13 2.3.2 Existing Slimes ................................................................................................ 13 2.4 Purpose .................................................................................................................... 14 2.4.1 Clean coal........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E – Water Balance and SWMP
    Appendix E: SWMP and Water Balance ZITHOLELE CONSULTING Zitholele Consulting Reg. No. 2000/000392/07 PO Box 6002 Halfway House 1685, South Africa Building 1, Maxwell Office Park, Magwa Crescent West c/o Allandale Road & Maxwell Drive, Waterfall City, Midrand T : 011 207 2060 F : 086 674 6121 E : [email protected] TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM PROJECT NAME: Duvha WULA Amendment PROJECT NO: 15008 TO: Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd – Morongwa Molewa DATE: 14 February 2017 FROM: Ms Jyothika Heera EMAIL molewa ME @eskom.co.za SUBJECT Duvha Power Station Stormwater Management Plan 22 February 2017 15008 Directors : Dr. R.G.M. Heath , S. Pillay , N. Rajasakran i DOCUMENT CONTROL SHEET Project Title: Duvha PS Stormwater Management Plan and Water Balance. Project No: 15008 Document Ref. No: 15008-45-Mem-001-Duvha PS Stw Management Plan Rev0 DOCUMENT APPROVAL ACTION DESIGNATION NAME DATE SIGNATURE Civil Engineering Jyothika Prepared Technologist Heera 22.02.2017 Project Engineering Nevin Reviewed Lead & Reviewer Rajasakran 22.02.2017 Eskom Project Morongwa Approved Manager Molewa 22.02.2017 RECORD OF REVISIONS Date Revision Author Comments 22.02.2017 0 JH Issued for comments. ZITHOLELE CONSULTING 22 February 2017 1 15008 1 INTRODUCTION Duvha Power Station, owned and operated by Eskom is a coal fired power station located in Witbank, Mpumalanga Province. The Power Station has six power generating units with a combined capacity of 3,600MW. The location of the Power Station is shown on Figure 1. Construction on the Power Station started in 1975 and the first unit was commissioned in 1984. Although this pre-dates the Environmental Conservation Act (ECA, 1989) and obviously any subsequent amendments and related legislation, the operations are environmentally compliant and they strive to maintain this.
    [Show full text]