DOCSLIB.ORG

List of Coal Power Stations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
List of Coal Power Stations Capacity SNo Station Country Location (MW) 51°23′14″N 03°24′16″W / 51.38722°N 1 Aberthaw Power Station Wales 1,560 3.40444°W 21°01′21″N 77°49′25″E / 21.02250°N 2 Amravati Thermal Power Station India 2,700 77.82361°E South 25°56′38″S 29°47′22″E / 25.94389°S 3 Arnot Power Station 2,100 Africa 29.78944°E 31°56′52″N 118°37′49″E / 31.94778°N 4 Banqiao Power Station China 2,070 118.63028°E 32°23′45″S 150°56′57″E / 32.39583°S 5 Bayswater Power Station Australia 2,640 150.94917°E 39°13′08″N 117°55′50″E / 39.21889°N 6 Beijiang Power Station China 2,000 117.93056°E 29°56′37″N 121°48′57″E / 29.94361°N 7 Guodian Beilun Power Station China 5,000 121.81583°E 51°15′59″N 19°19′50″E / 51.26639°N 8 Bełchatów Power Station Poland 5,354 19.33056°E United 36°16′53″N 80°03′37″W / 36.28139°N 9 Belews Creek Power Station 2,160 States 80.06028°W South 36°24′06″N 126°29′30″E / 36.40167°N 10 Boryeong Power Station 4,000 Korea 126.49167°E United 34°07′23″N 84°55′13″W / 34.12306°N 11 Bowen Power Station 3,499 States 84.92028°W 51°25′7″N 14°34′6″E / 51.41861°N 12 Boxberg Power Station Germany 2,575 14.56833°E 27°29′54″N 120°39′44″E / 27.49833°N 13 Cangnan Power Station China 2,000 120.66222°E 30°45′36″N 121°23′59″E / 30.76000°N 14 Caojing Power Station China 2,000 121.39972°E Hong 22°22′32″N 113°55′12″E / 22.37556°N 15 Castle Peak Power Station 4,108 Kong 113.92000°E Chandrapur Super Thermal Power 20°00′24″N 79°17′21″E / 20.00667°N 16 India 2,340 Station 79.28917°E 31°45′25″N 120°58′31″E / 31.75694°N 17 Changshu Power Station China 3,000 120.97528°E 31°57′30″N 119°59′33″E / 31.95833°N 18 Changzhou Power Station China 2,520 119.99250°E 53°18′12″N 00°46′50″W / 53.30333°N 19 Cottam Power Station England 2,000 0.78056°W United 36°23′29″N 87°39′17″W / 36.39139°N 20 Cumberland Power Plant 2,600 States 87.65472°W 37°59′02″N 105°55′41″E / 37.98389°N 21 Daba Power Station China 2,400 105.92806°E 40°31′14″N 112°40′04″E / 40.52056°N 22 Daihai Power Station China 2,400 112.66778°E 40°22′00″N 109°59′45″E / 40.36667°N 23 Dalate Power Station China 3,180 109.99583°E 40°01′44″N 113°17′37″E / 40.02889°N 24 Datong 2nd Power Station China 3,720 113.29361°E Datong Tashan Pithead Power 39°55′35″N 113°05′01″E / 39.92639°N 25 China 2,520 Station 113.08361°E 37°27′07″N 116°14′35″E / 37.45194°N 26 Dezhou Power Station China 2,670 116.24306°E 25°11′59″N 104°40′57″E / 25.19972°N 27 Diandong Power Station China 2,400 104.68250°E 28 Dingxiang Power Station China 2,000 38°30′50″N 114°50′41″E / 38.51389°N 29 Dingzhou Power Station China 2,520 114.84472°E 53°44′11″N 0°59′53″W / 53.73639°N 30 Drax Power Station England 4,000 0.99806°W 42°12′59″N 116°34′24″E / 42.21639°N 31 Duolun Power Station China 2,400 116.57333°E South 25°57′50″S 29°20′14″E / 25.96389°S 32 Duvha Power Station 3,600 Africa 29.33722°E 33°03′44″S 151°31′13″E / 33.06222°S 33 Eraring Power Station Australia 2,640 151.52028°E United 34 E. C. Gaston Power Station 2,013 States 51°53′12″N 75°22′31″E / 51.88667°N 35 Ekibastuz GRES-1 Power Station Kazakhstan 4,000 75.37528°E 26°19′31″N 104°46′11″E / 26.32528°N 36 Faer Power Station China 2,400 104.76972°E 28°11′38″N 115°42′35″E / 28.19389°N 37 Fengcheng Power Station China 2,520 115.70972°E 32°45′26″N 116°39′00″E / 32.75722°N 38 Fengtai Power Station China 2,520 116.65000°E 40°24′18″N 113°08′47″E / 40.40500°N 39 Fengzhen Power Station China 2,520 113.14639°E 51°03′23″N 06°34′37″E / 51.05639°N 40 Frimmersdorf Power Station Germany 2,413 6.57694°E 25°59′28″N 119°28′56″E / 25.99111°N 41 Fuzhou Power Station China 2,720 119.48222°E United 38°56′09″N 82°07′00″W / 38.93583°N 42 Gavin Power Plant 2,600 States 82.11667°W United 38°22′19″N 87°46′02″W / 38.37194°N 43 Gibson Generating Station 3,340 States 87.76722°W 30°31′40″N 106°49′34″E / 30.52778°N 44 Guang'an Power Station China 2,400 106.82611°E South 34°57′02″N 127°49′19″E / 34.95056°N 45 Hadong Power Station 4,000 Korea 127.82194°E 23°11′17″N 116°39′14″E / 23.18806°N 46 Haimen Power Station China 4,000 116.65389°E 30°39′22″N 113°55′23″E / 30.65611°N 47 Hanchuan Power Station China 3,200 113.92306°E 35°51′04″N 114°10′44″E / 35.85111°N 48 Hebi Power Station China 2,200 114.17889°E 34°50′7″N 136°57′43″E / 34.83528°N 49 Hekinan Power Station Japan 4,100 136.96194°E South 26°01′59″S 29°36′00″E / 26.03306°S 50 Hendrina Power Station 2,000 Africa 29.60000°E 39°22′59″N 111°11′08″E / 39.38306°N 51 Hequ Power Station China 2,400 111.18556°E 39°49′22″N 110°02′04″E / 39.82278°N 52 Hexi Power Station China 2,400 110.03444°E 24°44′15″N 111°21′09″E / 24.73750°N 53 Hezhou Power Station China 2,000 111.35250°E United 40°30′39″N 79°11′37″W / 40.51083°N 54 Homer City Generating Station 2,012 States 79.19361°W 24°18′24″N 121°45′50″E / 24.30667°N 55 Hoping Power Plant Taiwan 1,320 121.76389°E Houshi Power Station (zh) Houshi 24°18′16″N 118°07′33″E / 24.30444°N 56 China 4,200 Power Station 118.12583°E 22°51′23″N 120°11′49″E / 22.85639°N 57 Hsinta Power Plant Taiwan 4,326 120.19694°E 36°02′18″N 120°13′10″E / 36.03833°N 58 Huangdao Power Station China 2,050 120.21944°E 38°18′36″N 117°52′43″E / 38.31000°N 59 Huanghua Power Station China 2,520 117.87861°E 23°04′43″N 113°29′44″E / 23.07861°N 60 Huangpu Power Station China 2,170 113.49556°E 23°00′20″N 112°36′40″E / 23.00556°N 61 Huilai Power Station China 3,200 112.61111°E 45°30′26″N 119°39′00″E / 45.50722°N 62 Hongjun Power Station China 3,000 119.65000°E 63 Rosa Thermal Power Plant India 1,200 21°48′49″N 84°02′23″E / 21.81361°N 64 Jharsuguda Thermal Power Plant India 2,400 84.03972°E United 65 J. H. Miller Power Station 2,822 States 32°11′11″N 119°16′25″E / 32.18639°N 66 Jianbi Power Station China 3,800 119.27361°E 30°37′46″N 121°8′49″E / 30.62944°N 67 Jiaxing Power Station (zh) China 5,000 121.14694°E 36°43′46″N 104°45′37″E / 36.72944°N 68 Jingyuan Power Station China 2,000 104.76028°E 38°44′10″N 110°10′01″E / 38.73611°N 69 Jinjie Power Station China 2,400 110.16694°E 32°10′18″N 119°01′07″E / 32.17167°N 70 Jinling Power Station China 2,000 119.01861°E 27°37′34″N 111°28′55″E / 27.62611°N 71 Jinzhushan Power Station China 2,400 111.48194°E 72 Jiutai Power Station China 2,640 United 73 J. M. Stuart Power Station 2,441 States 51°50′05″N 14°27′37″E / 51.83472°N 74 Jänschwalde Power Station Germany 3,000 14.46028°E United 38°28′29″N 81°49′16″W / 38.47472°N 75 John E. Amos Power Plant 2,933 States 81.82111°W 32°12′46″N 119°12′34″E / 32.21278°N 76 Jurong Power Station China 2,000 119.20944°E Kahalgaon Super Thermal Power 25°14′34″N 87°15′48″E / 25.24278°N 77 India 2,340 Plant 87.26333°E 26°22′24″N 119°45′44″E / 26.37333°N 78 Kemen Power Station China 2,400 119.76222°E South 26°05′24″S 28°58′17″E / 26.09000°S 79 Kendal Power Station 4,116 Africa 28.97139°E 22°23′11″N 82°40′58″E / 22.38639°N 80 Korba Super Thermal Power Plant India 2,100 82.68278°E South 26°15′15″S 29°10′46″E / 26.25417°S 81 Kriel Power Station 3,000 Africa 29.17944°E 37°25′56″N 120°01′05″E / 37.43222°N 82 Laizhou Power Station China 2,000 120.01806°E Hong 25°04′40″N 121°31′26″E / 25.07778°N 83 Lamma Power Station 3,755 Kong 121.52389°E 29°11′12″N 119°30′23″E / 29.18667°N 84 Lanxi Power Station China 2,400 119.50639°E South 26°44′31″S 27°58′39″E / 26.74194°S 85 Lethabo Power Station 3,708 Africa 27.97750°E 36°29′21″N 116°14′35″E / 36.48917°N 86 Liaocheng Power Station China 2,400 116.24306°E 32°22′26″S 150°58′40″E / 32.37389°S 87 Liddell Power Station Australia 2,000 150.97778°E 31°56′26″N 120°04′33″E / 31.94056°N 88 Ligang Power Station China 3,840 120.07583°E 38°08′54″N 106°20′45″E / 38.14833°N 89 Lingwu Power Station China 3,200 106.34583°E 31°40′03″N 116°29′56″E / 31.66750°N 90 Liu'an Power Station China 2,520 116.49889°E 56°02′56″N 03°40′57″W / 56.04889°N 91 Longannet Power Station Scotland 2,400 3.68250°W 92 Hisar Thermal Power Plant India 1,200 38°15′16″S 146°34′37″E / 38.25444°S 93 Loy Yang Power Station Australia 3,150 146.57694°E 32°41′07″N 117°04′40″E / 32.68528°N 94 Luohe Power Station China 2,400 117.07778°E 34°49′15″N 113°00′51″E / 34.82083°N 95 Luyang Power Station China 2,000 113.01417°E 32°03′31″N 121°43′34″E / 32.05861°N 96 Lüsigang Power Station China 2,640 121.72611°E 23°48′0″N 120°11′0″E / 23.80000°N 97 Mailiao Power Plant Taiwan 4,200 120.18333°E South 27°06′02″S 29°46′17″E / 27.10056°S 98 Majuba Power Station 4,110 Africa 29.77139°E United 99 Martin Lake Power Station 2,380 States South 23°40′06″S 27°36′38″E / 23.66833°S 100 Matimba Power Station 3,990 Africa 27.61056°E South 26°16′57″S 29°08′27″E / 26.28250°S 101 Matla Power Station 3,600 Africa 29.14083°E 23°27′47″N 87°07′51″E / 23.46306°N 102 Mejia Thermal Power Station India 2,340 87.13083°E United 41°53′21″N 83°20′44″W / 41.88917°N 103 Monroe Power Plant 3,280 States 83.34556°W 22°49′22″N 69°33′10″E / 22.82278°N 104 Mundra Ultra Mega Power Station India 4,000 69.55278°E 42°48′00″N 80°03′01″W / 42.80000°N 105 Nanticoke Generating Station Canada 2,760 80.05028°W 31°45′25″N 120°58′31″E / 31.75694°N 106 Nantong Power Station China 4,060 120.97528°E 37°43′44″N 120°26′53″E / 37.72889°N 107 Nanshan Group Power Station China 2,000 120.44806°E 108 Sasan Ultra Mega Power Project India 4,000 United 36°54′12″N 111°23′25″W / 36.90333°N 109 Navajo Generating Station 2,409 States 111.39028°W 110 Neurath Power Station Germany 52°2′15″N 6°36′58″E / 52.03750°N 6.61611°E 4,400 50°59′44″N 06°40′09″E / 50.99556°N 111 Niederaussem Power Station Germany 3,864 6.66917°E 26°45′27″N 119°44′13″E / 26.75750°N 112 Ningde Power Station China 2,520 119.73694°E 29°28′57″N 121°30′34″E / 29.48250°N 113 Ninghai Power Station China 4,400 121.50944°E 18°45′31″N 79°27′17″E / 18.75861°N 114 NTPC Ramagundam
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POTENTIAL PARADISE FOSSIL PLANT RETIREMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Muhlenberg County, Kentucky
    Document Type: EA-Administrative Record Index Field: Final EA Project Name: Potential Paradise Plant Retirement Project Number: 2018-34 POTENTIAL PARADISE FOSSIL PLANT RETIREMENT FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT Muhlenberg County, Kentucky Prepared by: TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY Knoxville, Tennessee FEBRUARY 2019 To request further information, contact: Ashley Pilakowski NEPA Compliance Tennessee Valley Authority 400 W. Summit Hill Drive Knoxville, TN 37902 Phone: 865-632-2256 E-mail: [email protected] This page intentionally left blank Contents Table of Contents CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED FOR ACTION ......................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Related Environmental Reviews .............................................................................................. 4 1.4 Scope of the Environmental Assessment ................................................................................ 5 1.5 Public and Agency Involvement ............................................................................................... 5 1.6 Necessary Permits or Licenses and Consultation Requirements ............................................ 6 CHAPTER 2 - ALTERNATIVES ..........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States
    +44 20 8123 2220 [email protected] Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States https://marketpublishers.com/r/AC4983D1366EN.html Date: June 2012 Pages: 700 Price: US$ 450.00 (Single User License) ID: AC4983D1366EN Abstracts The global energy industry has explored many options to meet the growing energy needs of industrialized economies wherein production demands are to be met with supply of power from varied energy resources worldwide. There has been a clearer realization of the finite nature of oil resources and the ever higher pushing demand for energy. The world has yet to stabilize on the complex geopolitical undercurrents which influence the oil and gas production as well as supply strategies globally. Aruvian's R'search’s report – Analyzing the Energy Industry in United States - analyzes the scope of American energy production from varied traditional sources as well as the developing renewable energy sources. In view of understanding energy transactions, the report also studies the revenue returns for investors in various energy channels which manifest themselves in American energy demand and supply dynamics. In depth view has been provided in this report of US oil, electricity, natural gas, nuclear power, coal, wind, and hydroelectric sectors. The various geopolitical interests and intentions governing the exploitation, production, trade and supply of these resources for energy production has also been analyzed by this report in a non-partisan manner. The report starts with a descriptive base analysis of the characteristics of the global energy industry in terms of economic quantity of demand. The drivers of demand and the traditional resources which are used to fulfill this demand are explained along with the emerging mandate of nuclear energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility at Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province
    BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION BASIC ASSESSMENT PROCESS Savannah Environmental (Pty) Ltd Address: PO Box 148, Sunninghill, 2157 Tel: 011 234 6621 Fax: 086 684 0547 E-mail: [email protected] FOCUS GROUP MEETING NOTES OF STEVE TSHWETE LOCAL MUNICIPALITY MEETING Conducted on Monday, 23 January 2012, Minutes prepared by: Savannah Environmental Please address any comments to Alicia Govender at the above address. Basic Assessment Process: Proposed Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility At Arnot Power Station, Mpumalanga Province BASIC ASSESMENT PROCESS: BIOMASS CO-FIRING DEMONSTRATION FACILITY AT ARNOT POWER STATION MEETING MINUTES: FOCUS GROUP MEETING Venue: Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Date: 23 January 2012 Time: 11h15 – 12h00 MEETING ATTENDEES Name Organisation & Position Alicia Govender (AG) Savannah Environmental Tammy Kruger (TK) Savannah Environmental GG Mokhabela (GM) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Sibongile Mtsweni (SM) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Solly Links (SL) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Eric Ratshibvumo (ER) Steve Tshwete Local Municipality Theuns Bloom (TB) Eskom WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION The project team introduced themselves and a description of the project and proposed activities was given (presentation attached). Theuns Blom added that biofuel to be used for the proposed project will be sourced from the Mpumalanga area. The Biomass Co-Firing Demonstration Facility at Arnot Power Station is a pilot study. A pilot scale study was tested at a test site at the Rosherville MW facility in order for Eskom to get a feel of logistics involved. Eskom now want to try it on a full scale as part of their strategy to see how much biomass can be used to reduce the carbon footprint.
    [Show full text]
  • February 2011
    PRICE R60-00 FEBRUARY 2011 Picture by Chief Photographer Duane Daws Picture Supplement FEBRUARY 25, 2011 Rockwell Diamonds, Ventersdorp, Tirisano project PROJECT INDEX INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS 3 Gold 35 Electricity 4 Anglogold Ashanti’s Mponeng Below 120 Level Eskom’s Arnot capacity increase project 5 Phase 2 project 36 Eskom’s Ingula pumped-storage scheme 6 Gold Fields’ South Deep gold mine expansion 37 Eskom’s Kusile power plant project 7 Great Basin Gold’s Burnstone gold project 38 Eskom’s Medupi power station project 8 Rangold Resources’ Tongon gold project 39 Mmamabula energy project 10 Witwatersrand Consolidated Gold Resources’ Renewable energy feed-in tariff programme 11 Bloemhoek gold project 40 Green Building Property Development 12 Iron-ore 41 Absa Towers West office development 13 Assmang’s Khumani iron-ore expansion project 42 Menlyn Maine city precinct 14 Kumba Iron Ore’s Kolomela iron-ore project 44 Iron Mineral Beneficiation Services’ iron fines project 45 Petrochemicals, Oil and Gas 15 PetroSA’s Project Mthombo 16 Other mining sectors 46 Kalagadi Manganese project 47 Transport and Logistics 18 Norilsk Nickel and African Rainbow Minerals’ South African Roads Agency Limited’s Gauteng Nkomati nickel mine phase 2 large-scale mining Freeway Improvement Project 19 expansion project 48 The Gauteng Provincial Government’s Gautrain rapid rail link 20 Platinum 49 Transnet’s new multiproduct pipeline 21 Anglo Platinum’s Thembelani shaft 2 platinum project 50 Anglo Platinum’s Twickenham project 51 Water and Sanitation 22 Anglo Platinum’s
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Transformation: Are Intermediate Cities Different? South African Cities Network: Johannesburg
    CENTRE FOR DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT SENTRUM VIR ONTWIKKELINGSTEUN ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Lead authors: Lochner Marais (University of the Free State) Danie Du Plessis (Stellenbosch University) Case study authors: Drakenstein: Ronnie Donaldson (Stellenbosch University) King Sabata Dalindyebo: Esethu Ndzamela (Nelson Mandela University) and Anton De Wit (Nelson Mandela University Lephalale: Kgosi Mocwagae (University of the Free State) Matjhabeng: Stuart Denoon-Stevens (University of the Free State) Mahikeng: Verna Nel (University of the Free State) and James Drummond (North West University) Mbombela: Maléne Campbell (University of the Free State) Msunduzi: Thuli Mphambukeli (University of the Free State) Polokwane: Gemey Abrahams (independent consultant) Rustenburg: John Ntema (University of South Africa) Sol Plaatje: Thomas Stewart (University of the Free State) Stellenbosch: Danie Du Plessis (Stellenbosch University) Manager: Geci Karuri-Sebina Editing by Write to the Point Design by Ink Design Photo Credits: Page 2: JDA/SACN Page 16: Edna Peres/SACN Pages 18, 45, 47, 57, 58: Steve Karallis/JDA/SACN Page 44: JDA/SACN Page 48: Tanya Zack/SACN Page 64: JDA/SACN Suggested citation: SACN. 2017. Spatial Transformation: Are Intermediate Cities Different? South African Cities Network: Johannesburg. Available online at www.sacities.net ISBN: 978-0-6399131-0-0 © 2017 by South African Cities Network. Spatial Transformation: Are Intermediate Cities Different? is made available under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. 2 SPATIAL TRANSFORMATION: ARE INTERMEDIATE CITIES DIFFERENT? Foreword As a network whose primary stakeholders are the largest cities, the South African Cities Network (SACN) typically focuses its activities on the “big” end of the urban spectrum (essentially, mainly the metropolitan municipalities).
    [Show full text]
  • Written Statement of Mxolisi Mgojo, the Chief Executive Officer Of
    1 PUBLIC ENTERPRISES PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE INQUIRY INTO ESKOM, TRANSNET AND DENEL WRITTEN STATEMENT OF MXOLISI MGOJO, THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF EXXARO RESOURCES LIMITED INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 2 COST-PLUS MINES VERSUS COMMERCIAL MINES .......................................... 5 THE SO-CALLED “PRE-PAYMENT” FOR COAL ................................................. 9 PREJUDICE TO EXXARO’S COST-PLUS MINES AND MAFUBE ..................... 11 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 Arnot mine ............................................................................................................. 12 Eskom’s failure to fund land acquisition ................................................................. 12 Non-funding of operational capital at Arnot ............................................................ 14 The termination of Arnot’s CSA .............................................................................. 15 Conclusion of the Arnot matters ............................................................................. 19 Mafube mine.......................................................................................................... 19 Matla mine ............................................................................................................. 21 Non-funding of capital of R1.8 billion for mine 1 ...................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cumberland Fossil Plant to Comply with the CCR Rule Requirements
    Cumberland Fossil Fossil Plant Plant CUMBERLAND CITY,CITY, TENNESSEETENNESSEE QUICKQUICK FACTSFACTS OH IN IL WV KY MO VA TN NC AR SC MS AL GA EPA CCR RULERule Groundwater GROUNDWATER Monitoring MONITORING for 2019 Commissioning Date: 1973 This fact sheet summarizes groundwater monitoring conducted by Commissioning Date: 1973 This fact sheet summarizes groundwater monitoring conducted by TVA for the Output: 2,470 Megawatts TVACumberland as required Fossil Plant,by the as U.S. required Environmental by the U.S. Environmental Protection ProtectionAgency (EPA) Agency (16Output: billion 2,470 kilowatt-hours) Megawatts (16 billion Coal(EPA) CoalCombustion Combustion Residuals Residuals (CCR)(CCR) RuleRule. for The the 2019EPA calendar published year. the The EPA kilowatt-hours) published the CCR Rule on April 17, 2015. It requires companies operating coal- Number of homes powered: CCR Rule on April 17, 2015. It requires companies operating coal- 1.1 MillionNumber of homes powered: fired power plants to study whether constituents in CCR have been released to fired power plants to study whether constituents in CCR have been 1.1 Million groundwater from active, inactive and new CCR impoundments, as well as active Wet to Dry / Dewatered releasedand new CCR to groundwater. landfills. This fact sheet addresses the EPA CCR ConversionWet to Dry /Program: Dewatered Activities Rule groundwater monitoring only. underwayConversion Program: Complete The CCR Rule establishes multiple phases of protective groundwater monitoring for fly ash and gypsum. Bottom ash Inincluding addition baseline to ongoing sampling, groundwater Detection Monitoring monitoring and Assessment required under Monitoring. TVAdewatering Wide CCR tank-based Conversion solution Program Total Spend: Corrective action may be necessary at the completion of this process.
    [Show full text]
  • 2. DESCRIPTION of the PROPOSED PROJECT In
    Environmental Scoping Report for the proposed establishment of a New Coal-Fired Power Station in the Lephalale Area, Limpopo Province 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT In order to be able to adequately provide for the growing electricity demand, Eskom propose to construct a new power station with a maximum capacity of 4 800 MegaWatts (MW) in the Lephalale area in the vicinity of the existing Matimba Power Station. Currently the project name for the new proposed power station is Matimba B, but the name will be changed should the project be approved. The power station will be coal-fired, and source coal from local coalfields. 2.1 The Proposed Matimba B Power Station Matimba B Power Station is proposed to ultimately have a maximum installed capacity of up to 4800 MW, but the first phase to be constructed and operated will be approximately half that installed capacity. The exact output will depend on the specification of the equipment installed and the ambient operating conditions. The footprint of the proposed new power station is still to be determined through final engineering and design, but has been indicated by Eskom that the new facility will be similar in size (ground footprint) to the existing Matimba Power Station. The power plant and associated plant (terrace area) would require an area of approximately 700 ha, and an additional approximate 500 - 1000 ha would be required for ancillary services, including ashing facilities (alternate ash disposal options are, however, currently being investigated). It is envisaged that the proposed power station will utilise a range of technologies pertaining to cooling, combustion and pollution abatement.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Kentucky Environmental and Public Protection Cabinet File No
    COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC PROTECTION CABINET FILE NO. DAQ-26003-037 and DAQ-26048-037 SIERRA CLUB, VALLEY WATCH, INC., LESLIE BARRAS, HILARY LAMBERT, and ROGER BRUCKER, PETITIONERS, VS. ENVIRONMENTAL AND PUBLIC PROTECTION CABINET, and THOROUGHBRED GENERATING COMPANY, LLC RESPONDENTS. ************* HEARING OFFICER’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDED SECRETARY’S ORDER ************* TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................................i-iv I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY...............................................................................................1 II. STATEMENT OF THE CASE.........................................................................................6 III. BURDEN OF PROOF .....................................................................................................15 IV. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE ................................................................................15 V. GENERAL FINDINGS OF FACT.................................................................................24 VI. FINDINGS RELATING TO MAMMOTH CAVE NATIONAL PARK....................41 VII. FINDINGS RELATING TO IDEM...............................................................................45 VIII. FINDINGS OF FACT RELATED TO EACH COUNT, ARGUMENTS OF THE PARTIES, AND CONCLUSIONS ON COUNTS 1, 2, 8, 9, 10, 11, 14, 17 AND 18 .....................................................................48 COUNT 1 – Air Toxics, Risk ..........................................................................................48
    [Show full text]
  • September 28, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Ms
    Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP 301 S. College Street, Suite 3400 Charlotte, NC 28202 troutman.com Kiran H. Mehta [email protected] September 28, 2020 VIA ELECTRONIC FILING Ms. Kimberley A. Campbell, Chief Clerk North Carolina Utilities Commission 4325 Mail Service Center Raleigh, North Carolina 27699-4300 RE: Duke Energy Progress, LLC’s Motion for Leave to Designate Late-Filed Potential Cross Exhibits Docket No. E-2, Sub 1219 Dear Ms. Campbell: On behalf of Duke Energy Progress, LLC (the “Company”), please find enclosed for electronic filing a motion for leave to designate late-filed potential cross-examination exhibits. Please do not hesitate to contact me should have you have any questions. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. Sincerely, /s/ Kiran H. Mehta Kiran H. Mehta Enclosures cc: Parties of Record BEFORE THE NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA UTILITIES COMMISSION RALEIGH DOCKET NO. E-2, SUB 1219 DOCKET NO. E-2, SUB 1219 ) ) DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC’S In the Matter of ) MOTION FOR LEAVE TO ) DESIGNATE LATE-FILED Application by Duke Energy Progress, ) POTENTIAL CROSS EXHIBITS LLC for Adjustment of Rates and ) Charges Applicable to Electric Utility ) Service in North Carolina ) ) NOW COMES Duke Energy Progress, LLC (“DE Progress” or the “Company”), by and through its legal counsel and pursuant to Rules R1-7 and R1-24 of the Rules and Regulations of the North Carolina Utilities Commission (“Commission”), and hereby requests leave to designate as DEP Exhibit 75 Sierra Club witness Rachel Wilson’s direct testimony and exhibit RW-4 (Quarles Report) from Georgia Power Company’s 2019 Rate Case docket.
    [Show full text]
  • (2019) EPA's Final
    Attachment to Part B Comments of Earthjustice et al., EPA-HQ-OLEM-2019-0173 Assessment Monitoring Outcomes (2019) EPA’s Final Coal Ash Rule, 40 C.F.R. § 257.94(e)(3), requires the owners or operators of existing Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) units to prepare a notification stating that an assessment monitoring program has been established if it is determined that a statistically significant increase over background levels for one or more of the constituents listed in appendix III of the CCR Rule has occurred, without an alleged alternate source demonstration. This table identifies the CCR surface impoundments known to be in assessment monitoring and required to identify any constituent(s) in appendix IV detected at statistically significant levels (SSL) above groundwater protection standards and post notice of the assessment monitoring outcome per 40 C.F.R. § 257.95. The table includes the surface impoundments that were required to post notice of appendix IV exceedance(s), as applicable, or elected to do so as of the time of this assessment monitoring outcomes review (summer 2019). To the best of our knowledge, neither EPA nor any other entity has attempted to assemble this information and make it public. Note that this document is not confirming that the industry notifications or assessments were compliant with the CCR Rule or that additional units may not belong on this list. Assessment Monitoring Outcome # of Surface Impoundments Appendix IV Exceedance(s) 214 Appendix IV Exceedance(s), alleged Alternate Source Demonstration 16 No Appendix IV Exceedance Reported 64 Total 294 Name of Plant Appendix IV Operator CCR Unit or Site Exceedance(s) Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Ash Pond Yes Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Emergency Overflow Pond Yes Healy Power Plant GVEA AK Unit 1 Recirculating Pond Yes Charles R.
    [Show full text]
  • The Future of South African Coal: Market, Investment, and Policy Challenges
    PROGRAM ON ENERGY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT Working Paper #100 January 2011 THE FUTURE OF SOUTH AFRICAN COAL: MARKET, INVESTMENT, AND POLICY CHALLENGES ANTON EBERHARD FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES FREEMAN SPOGLI INSTITUTE FOR INTERNATIONAL STUDIES About the Program on Energy and Sustainable Development The Program on Energy and Sustainable Development (PESD) is an international, interdisciplinary program that studies how institutions shape patterns of energy production and use, in turn affecting human welfare and environmental quality. Economic and political incentives and pre-existing legal frameworks and regulatory processes all play crucial roles in determining what technologies and policies are chosen to address current and future energy and environmental challenges. PESD research examines issues including: 1) effective policies for addressing climate change, 2) the role of national oil companies in the world oil market, 3) the emerging global coal market, 4) the world natural gas market with a focus on the impact of unconventional sources, 5) business models for carbon capture and storage, 6) adaptation of wholesale electricity markets to support a low-carbon future, 7) global power sector reform, and 8) how modern energy services can be supplied sustainably to the world’s poorest regions. The Program is part of the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies at Stanford University. PESD gratefully acknowledges substantial core funding from BP and EPRI. Program on Energy and Sustainable Development Encina Hall East, Room E415 Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305-6055 http://pesd.stanford.edu About the Author Anton Eberhard leads the Management Programme in Infrastructure Reform and Regulation at the University of Cape Town Graduate School of Business.
    [Show full text]