DOCSLIB.ORG

High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (Hlpe) Report on Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (Hlpe) Report on Sustainable Forestry for Food Security and Nutrition September 2017 CFS 2017/44/Inf.20 E COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD SECURITY Forty-fourth Session "Making a Difference in Food Security and Nutrition" Rome, Italy, 9-13 October 2017 HIGH LEVEL PANEL OF EXPERTS ON FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION (HLPE) REPORT ON SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY FOR FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION This document can be accessed using the Quick Response Code on this page; an FAO initiative to minimize its environmental impact and promote greener communications. Other documents can be consulted at www.fao.org HLPE REPORT 11 Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition A report by The High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition June 2017 HLPE High Level Panel of Experts HLPE Reports series #1 Price volatility and food security (2011) #2 Land tenure and international investments in agriculture (2011) #3 Food security and climate change (2012) #4 Social protection for food security (2012) #5 Biofuels and food security (2013) #6 Investing in smallholder agriculture for food security (2013) #7 Sustainable fisheries and aquaculture for food security and nutrition (2014) #8 Food losses and waste in the context of sustainable food systems (2014) #9 Water for food security and nutrition (2015) #10 Sustainable agricultural development for food security and nutrition: what roles for livestock? (2016) #11 Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition (2017) All HLPE reports are available at www.fao.org/cfs/cfs-hlpe 2 HLPE Steering Committee members (July 2017) Patrick Caron (Chair) Carol Kalafatic (Vice-Chair) Amadou Allahoury Louise Fresco Eileen Kennedy Muhammad Azeem Khan Bernardo Kliksberg Fangquan Mei Sophia Murphy Mohammad Saeid Noori Naeini Michel Pimbert Juan Ángel Rivera Dommarco Magdalena Sepúlveda Martin Yemefack Rami Zurayk HLPE Project Team members Terence Sunderland (Team Leader) Fernande Abanda Ronnie de Camino Velozo Patrick Matakala Peter May Anatoly Petrov Bronwen Powell Bhaskar Vira Camilla Widmark Coordinator of the HLPE Nathanaël Pingault This report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition (HLPE) has been approved by the HLPE Steering Committee. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the official views of the Committee on World Food Security, of its members, participants, or of the Secretariat. This report is made publicly available and its reproduction and dissemination is encouraged. Non- commercial uses will be authorized free of charge, upon request. Reproduction for resale or other commercial purposes, including educational purposes, may incur fees. Applications for permission to reproduce or disseminate this report should be addressed by e-mail to [email protected] with copy to [email protected]. Referencing this report: HLPE. 2017. Sustainable forestry for food security and nutrition. A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome. 3 Contents FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................. 9 SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS .............................................................................. 11 Summary ............................................................................................................................. 11 Recommendations ............................................................................................................. 16 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 21 1 FORESTS, TREES AND FSN: SCOPE AND CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK .............. 23 1.1 Forests, trees and agroforestry: definitions and scope ....................................... 24 1.1.1 An extreme diversity ...................................................................................... 25 1.1.2 Forest definitions ............................................................................................ 27 1.2 A typology of forests and trees outside forests .................................................... 29 1.2.1 Primary (or old-growth) forests ...................................................................... 30 1.2.2 Secondary forests .......................................................................................... 31 1.2.3 Plantation forests ........................................................................................... 32 1.2.4 Other wooded land ......................................................................................... 33 1.2.5 Trees outside forests: agroforestry and other systems ................................. 33 1.3 Forest-dependent people ......................................................................................... 35 1.4 Forests, trees and FSN: a conceptual framework ................................................. 37 1.4.1 Ecosystem services ....................................................................................... 37 1.4.2 Linking ecosystem services provided by forest and trees to FSN ................. 38 1.4.3 Sustainable forestry for FSN .......................................................................... 40 1.5 Concluding remarks ................................................................................................. 40 2 CONTRIBUTIONS OF FORESTS AND TREES TO FSN .............................................. 43 2.1 Direct provision of food ........................................................................................... 43 2.1.1 Contribution to dietary diversity and quality ................................................... 43 2.1.2 Provision of animal-sourced foods ................................................................. 45 2.1.3 Provision of feed ............................................................................................ 47 2.1.4 Traded forest food products ........................................................................... 47 2.1.5 A critical role to buffer food scarcity ............................................................... 48 2.2 Provision of bio-energy, especially for cooking .................................................... 48 2.3 Contributions to economy and livelihoods ............................................................ 50 2.3.1 Income generation ......................................................................................... 50 2.3.2 Employment ................................................................................................... 52 2.3.3 Gender roles .................................................................................................. 54 2.4 Provision of ecosystem services, essential for agricultural production ............ 55 2.4.1 Water regulation ............................................................................................. 55 2.4.2 Soil formation, protection and nutrient circulation .......................................... 56 2.4.3 Agroecosystem stability, biodiversity protection and downstream resources 57 2.4.4 Pollination ...................................................................................................... 58 2.4.5 Synergies and trade-offs ................................................................................ 59 2.5 Forests, health and well-being ................................................................................ 59 2.6 Contributions to resilience of food systems ......................................................... 60 2.7 Synthesis and conclusions ..................................................................................... 61 4 3 FORESTRY TRENDS: CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES FOR FSN .................. 63 3.1 Forests at a glance: global area and main trends ................................................. 63 3.1.1 Global net forest loss is slowing down ........................................................... 64 3.1.2 Contrasted evolutions across forest types: the “forest transition”.................. 65 3.2 Increasing and competing demands on forests .................................................... 71 3.2.1 Increasing demand for food ........................................................................... 71 3.2.2 Increasing demand for wood and energy ...................................................... 73 3.2.3 Increased recognition of the protective roles of forests ................................. 74 3.3 Forests, trees, climate change and FSN ................................................................ 76 3.3.1 Impacts of climate change on forests and trees ............................................ 76 3.3.2 The contributions of forests and trees to FSN in a changing climate ............ 78 3.3.3 The contribution of forests and trees to mitigation of climate change ........... 79 3.3.4 Potential impacts on FSN of policies strengthening the contribution of forests and trees to mitigation of climate change ................................................................... 79 3.4 Impacts of changes on FSN ..................................................................................... 80 3.4.1 Impacts of deforestation and forest degradation ........................................... 80 3.4.2 Protected areas and FSN .............................................................................. 83 3.4.3 Production forests and FSN ........................................................................... 83 3.5 Conclusion: challenges and opportunities for FSN .............................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Strategy of Shifting Cultivators in West Kalimantan in Adapting to the Market Economy: Empirical Evidence Behind Gaps in Interdisciplinary Communication
    The strategy of shifting cultivators in West Kalimantan in adapting to the market economy: empirical evidence behind gaps in interdisciplinary communication Prudensius Maring1 Budi Luhur University, Indonesia Abstract Issues of climate change and expansion of large-scale land acquisition for industrial plantations continue to ravage the shifting cultivation system that 300–500 million subsistence farmer households depend on. In Indonesia, particularly in Kalimantan and Sumatera, village communities continue to practice shifting cultivation amidst the conversion of lands into industrial plantations. The rampant conversion of farmer's land by large scale companies based in the market economy has resulted in the decline of the shifting cultivation system, and compelled them to enter commercial production. I employed qualitative methods, conducting in- depth interviews and observations in West Kalimantan in 2018. Shifting cultivation today is not just for subsistence, but it is also a strategy to maintain claims to land that has been handed over to companies. Concurrently, people have been developing community plantations using industrial commodities such as rubber and oil palm, which still incorporate subsistence features. The changes occurring in villages have led to conflict since land availability has reduced, while the alternative of working for forestry and plantation companies is hampered by their lack of skills and knowledge. Theoretically, this study indicates the need for communication and synergy between the perspectives of political ecology and cultural ecology in order to understand the socio-politico-economic complexities haunting the village community's alterations in subsistence strategies. The practical implications are that land-based village development should open up communication among stakeholders and position village communities as the key beneficiary in the long run.
    [Show full text]
  • “Growth and Production of Rubber”
    biblio.ugent.be The UGent Institutional Repository is the electronic archiving and dissemination platform for all UGent research publications. Ghent University has implemented a mandate stipulating that all academic publications of UGent researchers should be deposited and archived in this repository. Except for items where current copyright restrictions apply, these papers are available in Open Access. This item is the archived peer-reviewed author-version of: Growth and production of rubber Verheye, W. In: Verheye, W. (ed.), Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Sciences. Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK. http://www.eolss.net To refer to or to cite this work, please use the citation to the published version: Verheye, W. (2010). Growth and Production of Rubber . In: Verheye, W. (ed.), Land Use, Land Cover and Soil Sciences . Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS), UNESCO-EOLSS Publishers, Oxford, UK . http://www.eolss.net GROWTH AND PRODUCTION OF RUBBER Willy Verheye, National Science Foundation Flanders and Geography Department, University of Gent, Belgium Keywords : Agro-chemicals, estate, Hevea, industrial plantations, land clearing, land management, latex, rubber. Contents 1. Introduction 2. Origin and distribution 3 Botany 3.1 Cultivars and Classification 3.2 Structure 3.3 Pollination and Propagation 4. Ecology and Growing Conditions 4.1 Climate Requirements 4.2 Soil Requirements 5. Land and Crop Husbandry 5.1 Planting and Land Management 5.2 Plantation Maintenance 6. Tapping and Processing 6.1 Tapping 6.2 Collection of Tapped Latex 6.3 Processing 7. Utilization and Use 8. Production and Trade 9. Environmental and Social Constraints of Plantation Crops 9.1 Land Tenure 9.2 Land Clearing 9.3 Use of Agrochemicals 9.4 Social and Rural Development 9.5 Biodiversity Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary Rubber is a tropical tree crop which is mainly grown for the industrial production of latex.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity in Locally Managed Lands
    land Biodiversity in Locally Managed Lands Edited by Jeffrey Sayer and Chris Margules Printed Edition of the Special Issue Published in Land www.mdpi.com/journal/land Biodiversity in Locally Managed Lands Special Issue Editors Jeffrey Sayer Chris Margules MDPI • Basel • Beijing • Wuhan • Barcelona • Belgrade Special Issue Editors Jeffrey Sayer Chris Margules James Cook University, Australia James Cook University, Australia Tanah Air Beta, Indonesia University of Indonesia, Indonesia Editorial Office MDPI AG St. Alban-Anlage 66 Basel, Switzerland This edition is a reprint of the Special Issue published online in the open access journal Land (ISSN 2073-445X) from 2016–2017 (available at: http://www.mdpi.com/journal/land/special_issues/biodiversity_managed). For citation purposes, cite each article independently as indicated on the article page online and as indicated below: Author 1; Author 2. Article title. Journal Name Year, Article number, page range. First Edition 2017 ISBN 978-3-03842-454-3 (Pbk) ISBN 978-3-03842-455-0 (PDF) Artic les in this vo lume are Open Access and distributed under the Creative Co mmo ns Attributio n license (CC BY), whic h allows users to download, copy and build upon published artic les even for commercial purposes, as long as the author and publisher are properly credited, which ensures maxi mum disse minatio n and a wide r impac t of our public atio ns. The boo k taken as a who le is © 2017 MDPI, Base l, Switze rland, distribute d unde r the te rms and co nditio ns of the Creative Commons license CC BY-NC-ND (http://c reativeco mmons.o rg/licenses/by -nc -nd/4.0/).
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Swamp and Lowland Forests of Sumatra (Indonesia)
    Forest Area Key Facts & Peat Swamp and Lowland Carbon Emissions Forests of Sumatra (Indonesia) from Deforestation Forest location and brief description With an area of some 470,000 km2, Sumatra is Indonesia’s largest island, and the world’s sixth largest, supporting 40 million people. The lowland forests cover approximately 118,300 km2 of the eastern part of the island. These rainforests are characterized by large, buttressed trees dominated by the Dipterocarpaceae family, woody climbers and epiphytes. Figs are also common in the lowland forests. There are more than 100 fig species in Sumatra. According to the SPOT Vegetation 2006 data, the Sumatran peat swamp forests total approximately 33,600 km2. These forests are located on Sumatra’s eastern coast and boast the deepest peat in Indonesia. Over 30 per cent of Sumatra’s peat are over 4 metres deep. Most of the peat are in the Sumatran province of Riau (56.1 per cent of its total provincial area). Unique qualities of forest area Sumatra’s lowland forests are home to a range of species including: Sumatran pine, Rafflesia arnoldii (the world’s largest individual flower, measuring up to 1 metre wide), Amorphophallus spp. (world’s tallest and largest inflorescence flower measuring up to 2 metres tall), Sumatran tiger, orang utan, Sumatran rhinoceros, Sumatran elephant, Malayan tapir, Malayan sun bear, Bornean clouded leopard, and many birds and butterflies. Although Sumatra’s peat swamp forests do not support an abundant terrestrial wildlife, they do support some of the island’s biggest and • The forest sector accounts rarest animals, such as the critically endangered Sumatran tiger, and the for 85 per cent of Indonesia’s endangered Sumatran rhinoceros and Asian elephant.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of the Amazon: Brazil, the United States, and the Nature of A
    IN SEARCH OF THE AMAZON AMERICAN ENCOUNTERS/GLOBAL INTERACTIONS A series edited by Gilbert M. Joseph and Emily S. Rosenberg This series aims to stimulate critical perspectives and fresh interpretive frameworks for scholarship on the history of the imposing global pres- ence of the United States. Its primary concerns include the deployment and contestation of power, the construction and deconstruction of cul- tural and political borders, the fluid meanings of intercultural encoun- ters, and the complex interplay between the global and the local. American Encounters seeks to strengthen dialogue and collaboration between histo- rians of U.S. international relations and area studies specialists. The series encourages scholarship based on multiarchival historical research. At the same time, it supports a recognition of the represen- tational character of all stories about the past and promotes critical in- quiry into issues of subjectivity and narrative. In the process, American Encounters strives to understand the context in which meanings related to nations, cultures, and political economy are continually produced, chal- lenged, and reshaped. IN SEARCH OF THE AMAzon BRAZIL, THE UNITED STATES, AND THE NATURE OF A REGION SETH GARFIELD Duke University Press Durham and London 2013 © 2013 Duke University Press All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America on acid- free paper ♾ Designed by Heather Hensley Typeset in Scala by Tseng Information Systems, Inc. Library of Congress Cataloging-in - Publication Data Garfield, Seth. In search of the Amazon : Brazil, the United States, and the nature of a region / Seth Garfield. pages cm—(American encounters/global interactions) Includes bibliographical references and index.
    [Show full text]
  • Rubber Tapping Machine
    International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056 Volume: 07 Issue: 06 | June 2020 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072 Rubber Tapping Machine Mr. Raghavendra Prasad S.A Assistant Professor, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, St. Joseph Engineering College, Mangalore, Karnataka, India ----------------------------------------------------------------------***--------------------------------------------------------------------- Abstract - A labour has to apply force many times on each 89% of area and 92% of production came from small holding tree to get the desired path for the harvesting of rubber so, this with an average size of 0.50 ha. The total area of natural makes the labour tired and they to do this job for so many rubber cultivation is sub-grouped into traditional (0.53 Mha) trees in a short duration at early morning on every day. This and nontraditional regions, where the traditional regions leads shortage in labour for rubber tapping in India. Hence a have the lion share. The state of Kerala and Kanyakumari motorized concept of tapping knife is needed to reduce their district of Tamil Nadu are the traditional NR cultivating effort. Our proposed machine will satisfy and full fill the above regions, whereas the non-traditional region are in the states problem. The main aim of this project is to rubber tapping in of Maharashtra, Karnataka, Goa , Andhra Pradesh and rubber trees. This equipment is having rack and pinion, Odisha, as classified by RBI [3]. battery, motor arrangement, in the rubber tapping machine. In this project the components are modeled by CREO Software 1.1 Uses & Importance of Rubber and animation also done by CREO software.
    [Show full text]
  • Gum Naval Stores: Turpentine and Rosin from Pine Resin
    - z NON-WOOD FORESTFOREST PRODUCTSPRODUCTS ~-> 2 Gum naval stores:stores: turpentine and rosinrosin from pinepine resinresin Food and Agriculture Organization of the Unaed Nations N\O\ON- -WOODWOOD FOREST FOREST PRODUCTSPRODUCTS 22 Gum navalnaval stores:stores: turpentine• and rosinrosin from pinepine resinresin J.J.W.J.J.W. Coppen andand G.A.G.A. HoneHone Mi(Mf' NANATURALTURAL RESRESOURCESOURCES INSTITUTEIN STITUTE FFOODOOD ANDAN D AGRICULTUREAGRIC ULTURE ORGANIZATIONORGANIZATION OFOF THETH E UNITEDUNITED NATIONSNATIONS Rome,Rome, 19951995 The designationsdesignations employedemployed andand thethe presentationpresentation of of materialmaterial inin thisthis publication do not imply the expression of any opinionopinion whatsoever onon thethe partpart ofof thethe FoodFood andand AgricultureAgriculture OrganizationOrganization ofof thethe UnitedUnited Nations concernconcerninging thethe legal status of any countrycountry,, territory, city or areaareaorofits or of its auauthorities,thorities, orconcerningor concerning the delimitationdelirnitation of itsits frontiers or boundaries.boundaries. M-37M-37 IISBNSBN 92-5-103684-5 AAllll rights reserved.reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrretrievalieval systemsystem,, oror transmitted inin any form or byby anyany means,means, electronic,electronic, mechanimechanicai,cal, photocphotocopyingopying oror otherwise, withoutwithout thethe prior permission ofof the copyright owner. AppApplicationslications forfor such permission,permission, with a statementstatement
    [Show full text]
  • Aroma Chemicals Derived from Effluent from the Paper and Pulp Industry
    STUDY INTO THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN AROMA AND FRAGRANCE FINE CHEMICALS VALUE CHAIN IN SOUTH AFRICA (TENDER NUMBER T79/07/03) FINAL REPORT (Submission date: 15 September 2004) Part Two/Four Report: Aroma Chemicals Derived from Effluent from the Paper and Pulp Industry STUDY CONDUCTED BY: Triumph Venture Capital (Pty) Limited In conjunction with Dr Lorraine Thiel and Mr Fadl Hendricks (“the Consultant”) PART 2 – AROMA CHEMICALS DERIVED FROM EFFLUENT FROM THE PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY This Report has been divided into four separate Parts. Each Part is self-contained and self- explanatory. Part One- Executive Summary Part Two- Report: Aroma Chemicals Derived from Effluent from the Paper and Pulp Industry Part Three- Report: Aroma Chemicals Derived from Petrochemical Feedstocks Part Four - Report: Aroma Chemicals Derived from Essential Oils NOTE: This Study was conducted for and on behalf of FRIDGE. FRIDGE holds the copyright in this report. Whilst care and due diligence has been observed to ensure the accuracy of all information contained herein and the correctness of all conclusions drawn, neither FRIDGE nor the Consultants shall be liable for any harm suffered by any person who relies upon the contents of this report. PART 2 – AROMA CHEMICALS DERIVED FROM EFFLUENT FROM THE PAPER AND PULP INDUSTRY INDEX 1. OVERVIEW OF THE AROMA CHEMICAL INDUSTRY ..................................... 1 1.1 The South African Chemical Industry........................................................... 1 1.2 Overview of the International Flavour and Fragrance Industry....................
    [Show full text]
  • Our Achievements Our History the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Was Founded Near Holyrood Abbey in 1670
    Our achievements Our history The Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh was founded near Holyrood Abbey in 1670. Now, with gardens at four sites in Scotland, RBGE is an internationally renowned centre of excellence in botany, horticulture and education, a world-class visitor attraction and home to globally important living and preserved plant collections and an outstanding botanical library and archive. Hortus Medicus The Edinburgh Garden Tropical RBGE establishes its RBGE starts work on Digital imaging of 300,000 Edinburgensis, moves to its Palm first regional garden, at Lijiang Botanic Garden, specimens means 10 per cent a catalogue of the second site, House Benmore. Logan follows in in partnership with of Herbarium collection Garden’s plants, published Leith Walk built 1969 and Dawyck in 1979 Chinese government can be viewed online 1683 1763 1834 1929 2001 2015 1697 1820 1904 1964 2002 Cape myrtle (Myrsine africana), Garden George Forrest Opening of new Herbarium Completion of the earliest specimen in the moves to arrives in China for his and Library building 25-year project Garden’s collection, brought back current site first pioneering plant brings together the two to document plant from the Cape of Good Hope at Inverleith collecting expedition preserved collections diversity of Bhutan Foreword This publication celebrates the recent accomplishments of our internationally Plant conservation and research are collaborative activities and our relationships with renowned Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh. As we strive to combat the loss governments, institutions and colleagues in 35 countries ensure that expertise and of biodiversity and to achieve a greater understanding of plants, fungi and resources are well targeted.
    [Show full text]
  • RUBBER AGROFORESTRY FEASIBILITY at SCALE RUBBER AGROFORESTRY Executive Summary
    RUBBER AGROFORESTRY FEASIBILITY AT SCALE RUBBER AGROFORESTRY EXECUTIVE SUMMARY May 2021 Rubber Agroforestry: Feasibility at Scale PREPARED FOR MIGHTY EARTH Maria Wang Mei Hua Grantham Centre for Sustainable Futures and Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, UK [email protected] Eleanor Warren-Thomas School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, UK [email protected] Thomas Cherico Wanger Sustainability, Agriculture and Technology Lab, School of Engineering, Westlake University, China Agroecology, University of Göttingen, Germany GlobalAgroforestryNetwork.org [email protected] This project was conducted in a personal capacity by the authors, and not on behalf of their respective institutions. The institutions hold no liability for this work. The work of Mighty Earth is supported by Waxman Strategies. Waxman’s work on forest conservation is funded in part by the Center for International Policy. Waxman is required under 22 U.S.C. § 614 to disclose that this material is distributed on behalf of the aforementioned organization, working under grant from the Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation. Additional information is on file with the Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Agroforestry system with coffee. Credit: World Agroforestry Centre/ S.K. Dalal 2 RUBBER AGROFORESTRY CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3.1.1.2 Permanent and temporary intercropping 38 3.1.1.3 Markets for secondary agroforestry products 43 Definition of Rubber Agroforestry 6 3.1.1.4 Payments for ecosystem services and eco-certification
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Local Livelihoods from Past to Present in the Central Kalimantan Ex-Mega Rice Project Area
    Analysis of local livelihoods from past to present in the Central Kalimantan ex-mega rice project area Suyanto, Noviana Khususiyah, Idris Sardi, Yana Buana and Meine van Noordwijk Southeast Asia Analysis of local livelihoods from past to present in the Central Kalimantan ex-mega rice project area Suyanto, Noviana Khususiyah, Idris Sardi, Yana Buana and Meine van Noordwijk Working Paper nr 94 Correct citation: Suyanto, Noviana Khususiyah, Idris Sardi, Yana Buana and Meine van Noordwijk. 2009. Analysis of local livelihoods from past to present in the Central Kalimantan ex-mega rice project area. Working paper 94. World Agroforestry Centre. Bogor, Indonesia. 70p Titles in the Working Paper Series aim to disseminate interim results on agroforestry research and practices and stimulate feedback from the scientific community. Other publication series from the World Agroforestry Centre include: Agroforestry Perspectives, Technical Manuals and Occasional Papers. Published by World Agroforestry Centre ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional Office PO Box 161, Bogor 16001, Indonesia Tel: +62 251 8625415 Fax: +62 251 8625416 Email: [email protected] http://www.worldagroforestrycentre.org/sea © World Agroforestry Centre 2009 Working Paper nr 94 The views expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the World Agroforestry Centre. Articles appearing in this publication may be quoted or reproduced without charge, provided the source is acknowledged. All images remain the sole property of their source and may not be used for any purpose without written permission of the source. Summary Indonesia is a prime target for international efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from land use and land use change sectors, since the country is known to be a global leader in such emissions, ranking third in overall greenhouse gas emissions (fossil fuels plus land use sectors), if assumptions about peatland emissions are correct.
    [Show full text]
  • “Automated Rubber Tapping Machine”
    VISVESVARAYA TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY Jnana Sangama, Belgavi, Karnataka – 590 014 Project Report on “AUTOMATED RUBBER TAPPING MACHINE” Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the award of degree of BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING IN MECHANICAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTED BY SAGAR K 1NH14ME109 SREESH S KRISHNA 1NH14ME123 SUSHREETH PUTHRAN 1NH14ME128 SYED ANIES 1NH14ME130 Under the guidance of Mr. SUJEETH SWAMI Asst. Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING NEW HORIZON COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING BANGALORE-560 103 2017-18 DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CERTIFICATE It is certified that the project entitled “AUTOMATED RUBBER TAPPING MACHINE” is work carried out by Sagar K, Sreesh S Krishna,Sushreeth Puthran,Syed Anies, a bonafide student of New Horizon College of Engineering, Bangalore in partial fulfillment for the award of degree of Bachelor of Engineering in Mechanical Engineering of the Visvesvaraya Technological University, Belgaum during the year 2017-18. It is further certified that all corrections/suggestions indicated for internal assessment has been incorporated in the report deposited in the departmental library. The Project Report has been approved as it satisfies the academic requirements in respect of Project Work prescribed for the said degree. Signature of the guide Signature of the HOD Signature of the Principal Mr. SUJEETH SWAMI Dr. M S GANESHA PRASAD Dr. MANJUNATHA Asst. Professor Dean-Student Affairs & HOD-ME, Principal Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, NHCE NHCE NHCE Name(s) of the student: University Seat Number(s): 1. SAGAR K 1NH14ME109 2. SREESH S KRISHNA 1NH14ME123 3. SUSHREETH PUTHRAN 1NH14ME128 4. SYED ANIES 1NH14ME130 External Examiner(s) Signature with Date 1.
    [Show full text]