DOCSLIB.ORG

R Graphics Output

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
R Graphics Output Familien und übergeordnete Taxa der in der GermanSL 1.4 vorkommenden Taxa Rhamnaceae Rosaceae Grossulariaceae Rosales Hydrangeaceae Urticaceae Moraceae Cannabaceae Ulmaceae Linaceae Euphorbiaceae Malpighiales Salicaceae Violaceae Clusiaceae Elatinaceae Betulaceae fabids Fagales Fagaceae Myricaceae Juglandaceae Fabales Polygalaceae Zygophyllales Fabaceae Celastrales Zygophyllaceae Cucurbitales Celastraceae Cucurbitaceae Rutaceae Sapindales Simaroubiaceae Anacardiaceae Sapindaceae Staphyleaceae Balsaminaceae Geraniales Tropaeolaceae rosids Geraniaceae Oxalidaceae Myrtales Onagraceae malvids Thymelaeaceae Lythraceae Santalales Loranthaceae superrosids Santalaceae Brassicales Resedaceae Brassicaceae Malvales Cistaceae Vitales Malvaceae Vitaceae Haloragaceae Saxifragales Saxifragaceae Crassulaceae Paeoniaceae Lentibulariaceae Bignoniaceae Scrophulariaceae Lamiales Oleaceae Plantaginaceae Lamiaceae Verbenaceae Boraginaceae lamiids Polemoniaceae Solanales Menyanthaceae Convolvulaceae Solanaceae Gentianales Rubiaceae Apocynaceae Gentianaceae Dipsacales Adoxaceae Caprifoliaceae Asterales Asteraceae asterids campanulids Campanulaceae Apiales Apiaceae Aquifoliales Araliaceae Aquifoliaceae Ericales Primulaceae eudicots Ericaceae Cornales Sarraceniaceae superasterids Cornaceae Montiaceae Molluginaceae Aizoaceae Tamaricaceae Droseraceae Caryophyllales Plumbaginaceae Polygonaceae Caryophyllaceae Portulacaceae Amaranthaceae dicots Nyctaginaceae Phytolaccaceae Proteales Elaeagnaceae Buxales Platanaceae Buxaceae Fumariaceae Ranunculales Papaveraceae Berberidaceae Ceratophyllales Ranunculaceae Ceratophyllaceae Araceae Zosteraceae Potamogetonaceae Alismatales Juncaginaceae Scheuchzeriaceae Hydrocharitaceae Alismataceae Butomaceae Asphodelaceae Amaryllidaceae Asparagales Hyacinthaceae Asparagaceae Orchidaceae Iridaceae Eriocaulaceae angiosperms Poales Typhaceae monocots Poaceae commelinids Cyperaceae Commelinales Juncaceae Commelinaceae Smilacaceae Liliales Colchicaceae Melanthiaceae Acorales Liliaceae Dioscoreales Acoraceae Piperales Dioscoreaceae magnoliids Laurales Aristolochiaceae Nymphaeales Lauraceae Nymphaeaceae Thuidiaceae Sematophyllaceae Rhytidiaceae Pylaisiadelphaceae Pterigynandraceae Plagiotheciaceae Neckeraceae Leucodontaceae Leskeaceae Hypnales Lembophyllaceae Hypnaceae Hylocomiaceae Fontinalaceae Fabroniaceae Entodontaceae Cryphaeaceae Climaciaceae Calliergonaceae Brachytheciaceae Anomodontaceae Amblystegiaceae Plagiomniaceae Orthodontiaceae Mniaceae Bryales Cinclidiaceae Catoscopiaceae Bryaceae Bartramiaceae Aulacomniaceae Schistostegacae Rhabdoweisiaceae Dicranales Leucobryaceae Fissidentaceae Ditrichaceae Dicranaceae Bruchiaceae Grimmiales Seligeriaceae Ptychomitriaceae Grimmiaceae Splachnales Splachnaceae Meesiaceae Bryopsida Funariales Funariaceae Disceliaceae Hookeriales Hookeriaceae Timmiales Daltoniaceae Pottiales Timmiaceae Orthotrichales Pottiaceae Hedwigiales Orthotrichaceae Encalyptales Hedwigiaceae Diphysciales Encalyptaceae Buxbaumiales Diphysciaceae Bryophytina Archidiales Buxbaumiaceae Tetraphidopsida Tetraphidales Archidiaceae Sphagnopsida Sphagnales Tetraphidaceae Polytrichopsida Polytrichales Sphagnaceae Andreaeopsida Andreaeales Polytrichaceae Andreaeaceae Mesoptychiaceae Anastrophyllaceae Trichocoleaceae Scapaniaceae Radulaceae Ptilidiaceae Pseudolepicoleaceae Porellaceae Plagiochilaceae Lophoziaceae Jungermanniales Lepidoziaceae Lejeuneaceae Bryophyta Jungermanniaceae Herbertaceae Gymnomitriaceae Geocalycaceae Embryophyta Frullaniaceae Cephaloziellaceae Cephaloziaceae Calypogeiaceae Jungermanniopsida Arnelliaceae Antheliaceae Pelliaceae Metzergiales Pallaviciniaceae Metzgeriaceae Moose Fossombroniaceae Calobryales Aneuraceae Haplomitriaceae Targioniaceae Ricciaceae Hepaticophytina Monosoleniaceae Marchantiales Marchantiaceae Lunulariaceae Marchantiopsida Conocephalaceae Cleveaceae Sphaerocarpales Aytoniaceae Blasiopsida Blasiales Sphaerocarpaceae Blasiaceae Anthocerotophyta Anthocerotopsida Anthocerotales Notothyladaceae Anthocerotaceae Dryopteridaceae Blechnaceae Aspleniaceae Polypodiales Thelypteridaceae Dennstaedtiaceae Polypodiaceae Hymenophyllaceae Adiantaceae Pteridopsida Salviniales Azollaceae Marsileales Salviniaceae Osmundales Marsileaceae Ophioglossales Osmundaceae Pteridophyta Selaginellales Ophioglossaceae Lycopodiopsida Isoetales Selaginellaceae Lycopodiales Isoetaceae Equisetopsida Equisetales Lycopodiaceae Equisetaceae Taxaceae Pinopsida Pinales Taxodiaceae Coniferopsida Pinaceae Ginkgoopsida Ginkgoales Cupressaceae Ginkgoaceae Biatorellaceae Helocarpaceae Arctomiaceae Physciaceae Melaspileaceae Heppiaceae Elixiaceae Vezdaeaceae Umbilicariaceae Trapeliaceae Stereocaulaceae Rimulariaceae Rhizocarpaceae Ramalinaceae Psoraceae Porpidiaceae Pilocarpaceae Parmeliaceae Lecanorales Pannariaceae Ophioparmaceae Mycoblastaceae Micareaceae Megalosporaceae Lecideaceae Lecanoraceae Hymeneliaceae Haematommataceae Eigleraceae Ectolechiaceae Collemataceae Coccocarpiaceae Cladoniaceae Catillariaceae Candelariaceae Bacidiaceae Alectoriaceae Agyriaceae Acarosporaceae Pleosporaceae Pleomassariaceae Mytilinidiaceae Mycosphaerellaceae Dothideales Microthyriaceae Dacampiaceae Capnoliaceae Mycoporaceae Lichenotheliaceae Arthopyreniaceae Sphinctrinaceae Sphaerophoraceae Caliciales Mycocaliciaceae Microcaliciaceae Coniocybaceae Caliciaceae Vahliellaceae Peltigerales Placynthiaceae Peltigeraceae Nephromataceae Lobariaceae Thelotremataceae Graphidales Graphidaceae Gomphillaceae Asterothyriaceae Hypocreales Niessliaceae Nectriaceae Bionectriaceae Ostropales Solorinellaceae Stictidaceae Odontotremataceae Leotiales Icmadophilaceae Leotiaceae Baeomycetaceae Verrucariales Adelococcaceae Verrucariaceae Pyrenulales Trichotheliaceae Pyrenulaceae Pertusariales Megasporaceae Pertusariaceae Opegraphales Roccellaceae Opegraphaceae Ascomycotina Lichinales Peltulaceae Lichinaceae Gyalectales Gypsoplacaceae Gyalectaceae Teloschistales Teloschistaceae Fuscideaceae Arthoniales Chrysotrichaceae Arthoniaceae Diaporthales Xanthopyreniaceae Trichosphaeriales Valsaceae Pleosporales Trichosphaeriaceae Onygenales Naetrocymbaceae Myxotrichaceae Flechten Eumycota Dactylosporaceae Aphanopsidaceae Thrombiaceae Thelenellaceae Pezizales Strigulaceae Schaereriaceae Protothlenellaceae Phlyctidaceae Patellariales Epigloeaceae Athrorhaphidaceae Tremellales Tremellaceae Syzygosporaceae Basidiomycotina Agaricales Hygrophoraceae Cantharellales Tricholomataceae Stereales Clavariaceae Chlorophyta Ulvophyceae Trentepohliales Atheliaceae Streptophyta Charophyceae Charales Trentepohliaceae Algen Heterokontophyta Xanthophyceae Botrydiales Characeae Cyanobacteriota Cyanophyceae Nostocales Botrydiaceae Nostocaceae.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plant Life Magill’S Encyclopedia of Science
    MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE MAGILLS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF SCIENCE PLANT LIFE Volume 4 Sustainable Forestry–Zygomycetes Indexes Editor Bryan D. Ness, Ph.D. Pacific Union College, Department of Biology Project Editor Christina J. Moose Salem Press, Inc. Pasadena, California Hackensack, New Jersey Editor in Chief: Dawn P. Dawson Managing Editor: Christina J. Moose Photograph Editor: Philip Bader Manuscript Editor: Elizabeth Ferry Slocum Production Editor: Joyce I. Buchea Assistant Editor: Andrea E. Miller Page Design and Graphics: James Hutson Research Supervisor: Jeffry Jensen Layout: William Zimmerman Acquisitions Editor: Mark Rehn Illustrator: Kimberly L. Dawson Kurnizki Copyright © 2003, by Salem Press, Inc. All rights in this book are reserved. No part of this work may be used or reproduced in any manner what- soever or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopy,recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission from the copyright owner except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles and reviews. For information address the publisher, Salem Press, Inc., P.O. Box 50062, Pasadena, California 91115. Some of the updated and revised essays in this work originally appeared in Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science (1991), Magill’s Survey of Science: Life Science, Supplement (1998), Natural Resources (1998), Encyclopedia of Genetics (1999), Encyclopedia of Environmental Issues (2000), World Geography (2001), and Earth Science (2001). ∞ The paper used in these volumes conforms to the American National Standard for Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, Z39.48-1992 (R1997). Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Magill’s encyclopedia of science : plant life / edited by Bryan D.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Crum, Howard. Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest. Fourth Edition. 2004. Viii + 592 Pages
    125 BOOK REVIEW 2007 - #1 Crum, Howard. Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest. Fourth Edition. 2004. viii + 592 pages; introduction; dichotomous keys; illustrations; taxonomic descriptions; black and white photographs; glossary; index to Latin names. University of Michigan Herbarium, Ann Arbor, Michigan. Hard Cover. ISBN: 0-9620733-6-3. Price: US $40.00. Available from University of Michigan Herbarium, Publications, 3600 Varsity Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48108-2287. The highly respected bryologist, Howard Crum, died in April 2002 before he could com- plete the fourth edition of his important and useful set of manuals entitled Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest (1973, 1976, and 1983). But fortunately and thankfully, William C. Buck and Christiane Anderson took on the task of editing and seeing Crum’s beautiful fourth edition to completion. Although the title, Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest, indicates a regional moss flora, the manual has a much broader application and can serve as an effective introductory taxo- nomic manual for the identification of mosses in the northeastern United States. In this respect, it is a handy companion to the more comprehensive two volume taxonomic pub- lication entitled Mosses of Eastern North America (Crum and Anderson, 1981). A significant feature following the introduction of Mosses of the Great Lakes Forest is the dichotomous key to genera treated in the manual; a feature not found in Mosses of Eastern North America. Descriptive materials (including illustrations) follow, with 545 pages for moss species of two divisions; Sphagnophyta (Peat Mosses) and Bryophyta with two classes Andreaeopsida (Granite Mosses) and Bryopsida (True Mosses). Following a description and noteworthy comments about the Sphagnophyta, and hence the only family Sphagnaceae, is a key to species of the single genus Sphagnum (pp.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Sphagnum</I> Peat Mosses
    ORIGINAL ARTICLE doi:10.1111/evo.12547 Evolution of niche preference in Sphagnum peat mosses Matthew G. Johnson,1,2,3 Gustaf Granath,4,5,6 Teemu Tahvanainen, 7 Remy Pouliot,8 Hans K. Stenøien,9 Line Rochefort,8 Hakan˚ Rydin,4 and A. Jonathan Shaw1 1Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708 2Current Address: Chicago Botanic Garden, 1000 Lake Cook Road Glencoe, Illinois 60022 3E-mail: [email protected] 4Department of Plant Ecology and Evolution, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvagen¨ 18D, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden 5School of Geography and Earth Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada 6Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07, Uppsala, Sweden 7Department of Biology, University of Eastern Finland, P.O. Box 111, 80101, Joensuu, Finland 8Department of Plant Sciences and Northern Research Center (CEN), Laval University Quebec, Canada 9Department of Natural History, Norwegian University of Science and Technology University Museum, Trondheim, Norway Received March 26, 2014 Accepted September 23, 2014 Peat mosses (Sphagnum)areecosystemengineers—speciesinborealpeatlandssimultaneouslycreateandinhabitnarrowhabitat preferences along two microhabitat gradients: an ionic gradient and a hydrological hummock–hollow gradient. In this article, we demonstrate the connections between microhabitat preference and phylogeny in Sphagnum.Usingadatasetof39speciesof Sphagnum,withan18-locusDNAalignmentandanecologicaldatasetencompassingthreelargepublishedstudies,wetested
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophyte Ecology Table of Contents
    Glime, J. M. 2020. Table of Contents. Bryophyte Ecology. Ebook sponsored by Michigan Technological University 1 and the International Association of Bryologists. Last updated 15 July 2020 and available at <https://digitalcommons.mtu.edu/bryophyte-ecology/>. This file will contain all the volumes, chapters, and headings within chapters to help you find what you want in the book. Once you enter a chapter, there will be a table of contents with clickable page numbers. To search the list, check the upper screen of your pdf reader for a search window or magnifying glass. If there is none, try Ctrl G to open one. TABLE OF CONTENTS BRYOPHYTE ECOLOGY VOLUME 1: PHYSIOLOGICAL ECOLOGY Chapter in Volume 1 1 INTRODUCTION Thinking on a New Scale Adaptations to Land Minimum Size Do Bryophytes Lack Diversity? The "Moss" What's in a Name? Phyla/Divisions Role of Bryology 2 LIFE CYCLES AND MORPHOLOGY 2-1: Meet the Bryophytes Definition of Bryophyte Nomenclature What Makes Bryophytes Unique Who are the Relatives? Two Branches Limitations of Scale Limited by Scale – and No Lignin Limited by Scale – Forced to Be Simple Limited by Scale – Needing to Swim Limited by Scale – and Housing an Embryo Higher Classifications and New Meanings New Meanings for the Term Bryophyte Differences within Bryobiotina 2-2: Life Cycles: Surviving Change The General Bryobiotina Life Cycle Dominant Generation The Life Cycle Life Cycle Controls Generation Time Importance Longevity and Totipotency 2-3: Marchantiophyta Distinguishing Marchantiophyta Elaters Leafy or Thallose? Class
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylodiverse Genome Sequencing Plan Shifeng Cheng1,2,†, Michael Melkonian3, Stephen A
    GigaScience, 7, 2018, 1–9 doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy013 Advance Access Publication Date: 20 February 2018 Commentary COMMENTARY 10KP: A phylodiverse genome sequencing plan Shifeng Cheng1,2,†, Michael Melkonian3, Stephen A. Smith 4, Samuel Brockington5, John M. Archibald6, Pierre-Marc Delaux7, Fay-Wei Li 8, Barbara Melkonian3, Evgeny V. Mavrodiev9, Wenjing Sun1,2, Yuan Fu1,2, Huanming Yang1,10, Douglas E. Soltis9,11, Sean W. Graham12, Pamela S. Soltis9,11,XinLiu1,2,†,XunXu1,2,∗ and Gane Ka-Shu Wong 1,13,14,∗ 1BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518083, China, 2China National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518120, China, 3Botanical Institute, Universitat¨ zu Koln,¨ Cologne D-50674, Germany, 4Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA, 5Department of Plant Sciences, University of Cambridge, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 3EA, UK, 6Centre for Comparative Genomics and Evolutionary Bioinformatics, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Dalhousie University, Halifax NS, B3H 4R2 Canada, 7Laboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Veg´ etales,´ Universite´ de Toulouse, UPS/CNRS, 24 chemin de Borde Rouge, Auzeville B.P. 42617, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France, 8Boyce Thompson Institute, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA and Section of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, 9Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, PO Box 117800, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, 10James D. Watson Institute of Genome Sciences, Hangzhou 310058, China, 11Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA, 12Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, Vancouver BC, V6T 1Z4 Canada, 13Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2E9 Canada and 14Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, T6G 2E1 Canada ∗Correspondence address.
    [Show full text]
  • Phytochrome Diversity in Green Plants and the Origin of Canonical Plant Phytochromes
    ARTICLE Received 25 Feb 2015 | Accepted 19 Jun 2015 | Published 28 Jul 2015 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms8852 OPEN Phytochrome diversity in green plants and the origin of canonical plant phytochromes Fay-Wei Li1, Michael Melkonian2, Carl J. Rothfels3, Juan Carlos Villarreal4, Dennis W. Stevenson5, Sean W. Graham6, Gane Ka-Shu Wong7,8,9, Kathleen M. Pryer1 & Sarah Mathews10,w Phytochromes are red/far-red photoreceptors that play essential roles in diverse plant morphogenetic and physiological responses to light. Despite their functional significance, phytochrome diversity and evolution across photosynthetic eukaryotes remain poorly understood. Using newly available transcriptomic and genomic data we show that canonical plant phytochromes originated in a common ancestor of streptophytes (charophyte algae and land plants). Phytochromes in charophyte algae are structurally diverse, including canonical and non-canonical forms, whereas in land plants, phytochrome structure is highly conserved. Liverworts, hornworts and Selaginella apparently possess a single phytochrome, whereas independent gene duplications occurred within mosses, lycopods, ferns and seed plants, leading to diverse phytochrome families in these clades. Surprisingly, the phytochrome portions of algal and land plant neochromes, a chimera of phytochrome and phototropin, appear to share a common origin. Our results reveal novel phytochrome clades and establish the basis for understanding phytochrome functional evolution in land plants and their algal relatives. 1 Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27708, USA. 2 Botany Department, Cologne Biocenter, University of Cologne, 50674 Cologne, Germany. 3 University Herbarium and Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA. 4 Royal Botanic Gardens Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH3 5LR, UK. 5 New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, New York 10458, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Table 3B: Status Category Summary by Major Taxonomic Group (Plants)
    IUCN Red List version 2019-2: Table 3b Last updated: 18 July 2019 Table 3b: Status category summary by major taxonomic group (plants) Subtotal** Subtotal Subtotal Class* EX EW CR(PE)** CR(PEW)** (EX+EW+ CR EN VU NT LR/cd DD LC Total (EX+EW) (threatened spp.) CR(PE)+CR(PEW)) ANDREAEOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 2 ANTHOCEROTOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 BRYOPSIDA 4 0 4 0 0 4 24 36 33 93 22 0 17 35 171 CHAROPHYACEAE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 8 11 CHLOROPHYCEAE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 CYCADOPSIDA 0 4 4 1 3 8 53 65 74 192 63 0 3 45 307 FLORIDEOPHYCEAE 1 0 1 2 0 3 6 0 3 9 0 0 44 4 58 GINKGOOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 GNETOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 4 7 0 10 76 97 JUNGERMANNIOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 23 20 55 10 0 2 18 85 LILIOPSIDA 9 4 13 64 2 79 532 901 809 2,242 390 10 688 2,715 6,058 LYCOPODIOPSIDA 0 0 0 2 0 2 14 11 16 41 9 0 8 31 89 MAGNOLIOPSIDA 107 26 133 170 18 321 2,292 3,843 5,159 11,294 1,458 170 1,579 10,926 25,560 MARCHANTIOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 1 6 1 0 4 1 12 PINOPSIDA 0 0 0 1 0 1 29 96 79 204 98 0 7 298 607 POLYPODIOPSIDA 2 1 3 8 0 11 62 70 79 211 27 0 54 209 504 POLYTRICHOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 SPHAGNOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 4 0 0 0 1 5 TAKAKIOPSIDA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 ULVOPHYCEAE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Total 123 35 158 248 23 429 3,027 5,053 6,279 14,359 2,086 180 2,420 14,367 33,570 IUCN Red List Categories: EX - Extinct, EW - Extinct in the Wild, CR - Critically Endangered (includes CR(PE) and CR(PEW)), EN - Endangered, VU - Vulnerable, LR/cd - Lower Risk/conservation dependent, NT - Near Threatened (includes LR/nt - Lower Risk/near threatened), DD - Data Deficient, LC - Least Concern (includes LR/lc - Lower Risk, least concern).
    [Show full text]
  • BIOLOGIA E BOTANICA FARMACEUTICA Seconda Edizione Se A00 E .Q D 8/06/ 0
    se a00_ e_ .q d 8/06/ 0 . 0 ag a BIOLOGIA E BOTANICA FARMACEUTICA Seconda Edizione se a00_ e_ .q d 8/06/ 0 . 0 ag a Dello stesso Editore: Alescio – Biologia dinamica Galzigna – Elementi di enzimologia Amend/Mundy/Armold – Chimica generale, Ganong – Fisiologia medica organica e biologica Garret/Grinshaw – Principi di biochimica Arienti – Le basi molecolari della nutrizione Gastaldo – Compendio della flora officinale Arienti – Un compendio di biochimica italiana Arms/Camp – Biologia Giunchedi/Conti/Gallitelli/Martelli – Elementi Attena – Epidemiologia e valutazione di virologia vegetale degli interventi sanitari Goglia – Anatomia umana Bauer – Analisi strumentale Grassi/Labra/Sala – Introduzione alla biodiversità Bauer/Birk/Marks – Introduzione alla chimica. del mondo vegetale Un approccio concettuale Greenspan – Endocrinologia generale e clinica Bergmeyer – Principi di analisi enzimatica Inaba/Cohen – Eccitanti, sedativi, psichedelici Bolognani/Volpi – Tavole metaboliche Judd – Botanica sistematica + Cd rom Bruni – Farmacognosia generale e applicata Junqueira/Carneiro – Istologia Bruni/Nicoletti – Dizionario di erboristeria e di Katzung – Farmacologia generale e clinica fitoterapia Katzung/Trevor – Farmacologia: quesiti a scelta Cabras/Martelli – Chimica degli alimenti multipla e compendio della materia Cao/Dallapiccola/Notarangelo – Malattie geneti- Kolthoff – Analisi chimica quantitativa che (molecole e geni) Laurence/Carpenter – Dizionario di Castino/Roletto – Statistica applicata farmacologia Cevenini – Microbiologia e microbiologia
    [Show full text]
  • TAS3 Mir390-Dependent Loci in Non-Vascular Land Plants: Towards a Comprehensive Reconstruction of the Gene Evolutionary History
    TAS3 miR390-dependent loci in non-vascular land plants: towards a comprehensive reconstruction of the gene evolutionary history Sergey Y. Morozov1, Irina A. Milyutina1, Tatiana N. Erokhina2, Liudmila V. Ozerova3, Alexey V. Troitsky1 and Andrey G. Solovyev1,4 1 Belozersky Institute of Physico-Chemical Biology, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 2 Shemyakin-Ovchinnikov Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 3 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden, Russian Academy of Science, Moscow, Russia 4 Institute of Molecular Medicine, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia ABSTRACT Trans-acting small interfering RNAs (ta-siRNAs) are transcribed from protein non- coding genomic TAS loci and belong to a plant-specific class of endogenous small RNAs. These siRNAs have been found to regulate gene expression in most taxa including seed plants, gymnosperms, ferns and mosses. In this study, bioinformatic and experimental PCR-based approaches were used as tools to analyze TAS3 and TAS6 loci in transcriptomes and genomic DNAs from representatives of evolutionary distant non-vascular plant taxa such as Bryophyta, Marchantiophyta and Anthocero- tophyta. We revealed previously undiscovered TAS3 loci in plant classes Sphagnopsida and Anthocerotopsida, as well as TAS6 loci in Bryophyta classes Tetraphidiopsida, Polytrichopsida, Andreaeopsida and Takakiopsida. These data further unveil the evolutionary pathway of the miR390-dependent TAS3 loci in land plants. We also identified charophyte alga sequences coding for SUPPRESSOR OF GENE SILENCING 3 (SGS3), which is required for generation of ta-siRNAs in plants, and hypothesized that the appearance of TAS3-related sequences could take place at a very early step in Submitted 19 February 2018 evolutionary transition from charophyte algae to an earliest common ancestor of land Accepted 28 March 2018 plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphology of Mosses (Phylum Bryophyta)
    Morphology of Mosses (Phylum Bryophyta) Barbara J. Crandall-Stotler Sharon E. Bartholomew-Began With over 12,000 species recognized worldwide (M. R. Superclass IV, comprising only Andreaeobryum; and Crosby et al. 1999), the Bryophyta, or mosses, are the Superclass V, all the peristomate mosses, comprising most most speciose of the three phyla of bryophytes. The other of the diversity of mosses. Although molecular data have two phyla are Marchantiophyta or liverworts and been undeniably useful in identifying the phylogenetic Anthocerotophyta or hornworts. The term “bryophytes” relationships among moss lineages, morphological is a general, inclusive term for these three groups though characters continue to provide definition of systematic they are only superficially related. Mosses are widely groupings (D. H. Vitt et al. 1998) and are diagnostic for distributed from pole to pole and occupy a broad range species identification. This chapter is not intended to be of habitats. Like liverworts and hornworts, mosses an exhaustive treatise on the complexities of moss possess a gametophyte-dominated life cycle; i.e., the morphology, but is aimed at providing the background persistent photosynthetic phase of the life cycle is the necessary to use the keys and diagnostic descriptions of haploid, gametophyte generation. Sporophytes are this flora. matrotrophic, permanently attached to and at least partially dependent on the female gametophyte for nutrition, and are unbranched, determinate in growth, Gametophyte Characters and monosporangiate. The gametophytes of mosses are small, usually perennial plants, comprising branched or Spore Germination and Protonemata unbranched shoot systems bearing spirally arranged leaves. They rarely are found in nature as single isolated A moss begins its life cycle when haploid spores are individuals, but instead occur in populations or colonies released from a sporophyte capsule and begin to in characteristic growth forms, such as mats, cushions, germinate.
    [Show full text]
  • Bryophythes (Мosses) Place of Bryophytes
    Bryophythes (Мosses) Place of Bryophytes Nonvascular Plants : • do not have vascular tissue (or if present, it is very reduced) • generally small in size - grow close to the ground in moist areas • first evolved in environments that were transitional between the land and the sea • dependent on water to complete their life cycles (modern nonvascular plants too) , • able to withstand long periods of desiccation The group of Nonvascular plants include mosses, liverworts, and hornworts Bryophythes (Mosses) Main features: •Non vascular higher plants - conductive tissues missing – phloem & xylem - water is transferred from cell to cell via diffusion •Vegetative organs missing - root, stem & leaves • Development - in wet habitats •Life cycle - alternation of generations - sexually generation (gametophyte) with asexually (sporophyte); gametophyte prevailing •Reproduction - by moving cells (sperms) •Fertilization - depends of aqueous environment ? What is it Gametophyte and Sporophyte? Tokyo Palace collection (Japan) - white pine Bonsai - the oldest known specimen of Bonsai in the world (at age 500 years and above) Trends in plant evolution Life cycle in moss - alternate two generations - sporophyte and gametophyte - haploid gametophyte prevail (which we define as a moss) ! In the other groups of Vascular plants from moss above - the real plant is sporophyte, which is dominate by size and function in life cycle! Moss sporophyte produces spores, which spores germinate to form an alga-like filamentous structure called the protonema. It represents the juvenile gametophyte. The mature gametophyte consist of stem, which may be simple or branched and upright or prostrate; simple leaves, usually only a single layer of cells with no internal air spaces, often with thicker midribs; and do not have proper roots, but have threadlike rhizoids that anchor them to their substrate.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Phylogenetics of Mosses and Relatives
    MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS OF MOSSES AND RELATIVES! by! Ying Chang! ! ! A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF ! DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY! in! The Faculty of Graduate Studies! (Botany)! ! ! THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA! (Vancouver)! July 2011! © Ying Chang, 2011 ! ABSTRACT! Substantial ambiguities still remain concerning the broad backbone of moss phylogeny. I surveyed 17 slowly evolving plastid genes from representative taxa to reconstruct phylogenetic relationships among the major lineages of mosses in the overall context of land-plant phylogeny. I first designed 78 bryophyte-specific primers and demonstrated that they permit straightforward amplification and sequencing of 14 core genes across a broad range of bryophytes (three of the 17 genes required more effort). In combination, these genes can generate sturdy and well- resolved phylogenetic inferences of higher-order moss phylogeny, with little evidence of conflict among different data partitions or analyses. Liverworts are strongly supported as the sister group of the remaining land plants, and hornworts as sister to vascular plants. Within mosses, besides confirming some previously published findings based on other markers, my results substantially improve support for major branching patterns that were ambiguous before. The monogeneric classes Takakiopsida and Sphagnopsida likely represent the first and second split within moss phylogeny, respectively. However, this result is shown to be sensitive to the strategy used to estimate DNA substitution model parameter values and to different data partitioning methods. Regarding the placement of remaining nonperistomate lineages, the [[[Andreaeobryopsida, Andreaeopsida], Oedipodiopsida], peristomate mosses] arrangement receives moderate to strong support. Among peristomate mosses, relationships among Polytrichopsida, Tetraphidopsida and Bryopsida remain unclear, as do the earliest splits within sublcass Bryidae.
    [Show full text]