DOCSLIB.ORG

Howell Cobb to J.D

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Howell Cobb to J.D 1 Howell Cobb to J.D. Hoover (1868) Howell Cobb Introduction (Secondary Source)1 Questions to Consider: 1. Context: Who is the author(s) (include a brief bio)? When did s/he write the piece (include some brief context)? Who is the audience? What was the agenda? 2. Why is the author hesitant to write this letter? What does this suggest about the identity of the nation at this time? 3. What is this author’s view on the future? Why? Significance? 4. What does he say happened to their property? Why? Significance? 5. What insights does this document have to offer about American society? Be Specific! [please be sure to consider author, agenda, bias, etc.] Primary Source2 HOWELL COBB TO J. D. HOOVER, CHAIRMAN.352MACON [GA.], 4 Jany., 1868. DR. SIR: Your invitation to attend the celebration of the 8th January by the democratic resident committee of Washington City has just been received. It revives pleasant memories of the past— and tempts me to break a self-imposed silence on political questions which I have observed since the close of the War. And yet I hesitate to write—for what I write may not harmonize with the festivities of the occasion which assembles you and I would not mar the happy hours of those 1 2 Annual Report of the American Historical Association for the Year 1911, vol. II, The Correspondence of Robert Toombs, Alexander H. Stephens, and Howell Cobb, edited by Ulrich B. Phillips, Portage Publications, pp. 860-864. The underlying text in this primary source is in the public domain. 2 who meet to celebrate a national festival under the protecting care of the constitution of our fathers. We of the ill-fated South realize only the mournful present whose lesson teaches us to prepare for a still gloomier future. To participate in a national festival would be a cruel mockery, for which I frankly say to you I have no heart, however much I may honor the occasion and esteem the association with which I would be thrown. The people of the south, conquered, ruined, impoverished, and oppressed, bear up with patient fortitude under the heavy weight of their burthens. Disarmed and reduced to poverty, they are power-less to protect themselves against wrong and injustice; and can only await with unbroken spirits that destiny which the future has instore for them. At the bidding of their more powerful conquerors they laid down their arms, abandoned a hopeless struggle, and returned to their quiet homes under the plighted faith of a soldier’s honor that they should be protected so long as they observed the obligations imposed upon them of peaceful law-abiding citizens. Despite the bitter charges and accusations brought against our people, I hesitate not to say that since that hour their bearing and conduct have been marked by a dignified and honorable submission which should command the respect of their bitterest enemy and challenge the admiration of the civilized world. Deprived of our property and ruined in our estates by the results of the war, we have accepted the situation and given the pledge of a faith never yet bro-ken to abide it. Our conquerors seem to think we should accompany our acquiescence with some exhibition of gratitude for the ruin which they have brought upon us. We cannot see it in that light. Since the close of the war they have taken our property of various kinds, sometimes by seizure, and sometimes by purchase,— and when we have asked for remuneration have been informed that the claims of rebels are never recognized by the Government. To this decision necessity compels us to submit; but our conquerors express surprise that we do not see in such ruling the evidence of their kindness and forgiving spirit. They have imposed upon us in our hour of distress and ruin a heavy and burthensome tax, peculiar and limited to our impoverished section. Against such legislation we have ventured to utter an earnest appeal, which to many of their leading spirits indicates a spirit of insubordination which calls for additional burthens. They have deprived us of the protection afforded by our state constitutions and laws, and put life, liberty and property at the disposal of absolute military power. Against this violation of plighted faith and constitutional right we have earnestly and solemnly protested, and our protests have been denounced as insolent;—and our restlessness under the wrong and oppression which have followed these acts has been construed into a rebellious spirit, demanding further and more stringent restrictions of civil and constitutional rights. They have arrested the wheels of State government, paralyzed the arm of industry, engendered a spirit of bitter antagonism on the part of our negro population towards the white people with whom it is the interest of both races they should maintain kind and friendly relations, are now struggling by all the means in their power both legal and illegal, constitutional and unconstitutional, to make our former slaves our masters, bringing these Southern states 3 under the power of negro supremacy. To these efforts we have opposed appeals, protests, and every other means of resistance in our power, and shall continue to do so to the bitter end. If the South is to be made a pandemonium and a howling wilderness the responsibility shall not rest upon our heads. Our conquerors regard these efforts on our part to save ourselves and posterity from the terrible results of their policy and conduct as anew rebellion against the constitution of our country, and profess to be amazed that in all this we have failed to see the evidence of their great magnanimity and exceeding generosity. Standing today in the midst of the gloom and suffering which meets the eye in every direction, we can but feel that we are the victims of cruel legislation and the harsh enforcement of unjust laws. On the other hand our conquerors are amazed that the sufferings of our people create no joy, and the threatened starvation of our wives and children afford no cause for mirth and hilarity, and above all that our hearts do not overflow with gratitude to those who have brought these calamities upon us, and whose policy foreshadows still greater sufferings and gloomier days. We regarded the close of the war as ending the relationship of enemies and the beginning of a new national brother-hood, and in the light of that conviction felt and spoke of constitutional equality. We felt and spoke as freemen and American citizens, and some were bold enough to present their petitions and grievances before the governing power. Such had always been the right and privilege of an American citizen;—but regarding our status in a far different light, such petitions and complaints were denounced in our legislative halls as impertinent and insolent con-duct, and even the representative who offered them was rebuked for his temerity. We claimed that the result of the war left us a state in the Union, and therefore under the protection of the constitution, rendering in return cheerful obedience to its requirements and bearing in common with the other states of the Union the burthens of government, submitting even as we were compelled to do to taxation without representation; but they tell us that a successful war to keep us in the Union left us out of the Union and that the pretension we put up for constitutional protection evidences bad temper on our part and a want of appreciation of the generous spirit which declares that the constitution is not over us for the purpose of protection. It reaches our case only when burthens are to be imposed. If on the other hand we venture to whisper that this theory makes secession an accomplished fact and puts these southern states out of the Union, we stand forthwith charged with a renewal of the old issue and a hidden desire to war upon the integrity of the Union. In such reasoning is found a justification of the policy which seeks to put the South under negro supremacy. Better, they say, to hazard the consequences of negro supremacy in the south with its sure and inevitable results upon Northern prosperity than to put faith in the people of the south who though overwhelmed and conquered have ever showed themselves a brave and generous people, true to their plighted faith in peace and in war, in adversity as in prosperity. If were main silent in the midst of all these conflicting trials and troubles, we are taunted with a cowardly fear that prevents an honest expression of opinion. If on the other hand a brave, and it may be an imprudent spirit, ventures to give expression to his convictions on questions so vitally affecting the very existence of our people, he is threatened with arrest as a disturber of the public peace and the instigator of a new rebellion. Whatever we may do or say is construed into the exhibition 4 of disloyal sentiments and made the pre-text for renewed aggressive legislation. It is one of the strange features of human organization to hate those whom we have wronged, and each additional wrong that we put upon others intensifies the hatred which the first wrong created. In this way alone can I account for the bitterness with which our conquerors have pursued our ruined people. That they do hate us none can doubt who will calmly review the history of the governing power since the close of the war. That it will continue through life I doubt not; and in torment they will raise up their eyes, cursing the good and virtuous who are peacefully reposing in Abraham’s bosom, beyond the reach of their malignity.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Popular Sovereignty, Slavery in the Territories, and the South, 1785-1860
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2010 Popular sovereignty, slavery in the territories, and the South, 1785-1860 Robert Christopher Childers Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Childers, Robert Christopher, "Popular sovereignty, slavery in the territories, and the South, 1785-1860" (2010). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1135. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1135 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. POPULAR SOVEREIGNTY, SLAVERY IN THE TERRITORIES, AND THE SOUTH, 1785-1860 A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of History by Robert Christopher Childers B.S., B.S.E., Emporia State University, 2002 M.A., Emporia State University, 2004 May 2010 For my wife ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Writing history might seem a solitary task, but in truth it is a collaborative effort. Throughout my experience working on this project, I have engaged with fellow scholars whose help has made my work possible. Numerous archivists aided me in the search for sources. Working in the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill gave me access to the letters and writings of southern leaders and common people alike.
    [Show full text]
  • Study Guide for the Georgia History Exemption Exam Below Are 99 Entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (Available At
    Study guide for the Georgia History exemption exam Below are 99 entries in the New Georgia Encyclopedia (available at www.georgiaencyclopedia.org. Students who become familiar with these entries should be able to pass the Georgia history exam: 1. Georgia History: Overview 2. Mississippian Period: Overview 3. Hernando de Soto in Georgia 4. Spanish Missions 5. James Oglethorpe (1696-1785) 6. Yamacraw Indians 7. Malcontents 8. Tomochichi (ca. 1644-1739) 9. Royal Georgia, 1752-1776 10. Battle of Bloody Marsh 11. James Wright (1716-1785) 12. Salzburgers 13. Rice 14. Revolutionary War in Georgia 15. Button Gwinnett (1735-1777) 16. Lachlan McIntosh (1727-1806) 17. Mary Musgrove (ca. 1700-ca. 1763) 18. Yazoo Land Fraud 19. Major Ridge (ca. 1771-1839) 20. Eli Whitney in Georgia 21. Nancy Hart (ca. 1735-1830) 22. Slavery in Revolutionary Georgia 23. War of 1812 and Georgia 24. Cherokee Removal 25. Gold Rush 26. Cotton 27. William Harris Crawford (1772-1834) 28. John Ross (1790-1866) 29. Wilson Lumpkin (1783-1870) 30. Sequoyah (ca. 1770-ca. 1840) 31. Howell Cobb (1815-1868) 32. Robert Toombs (1810-1885) 33. Alexander Stephens (1812-1883) 34. Crawford Long (1815-1878) 35. William and Ellen Craft (1824-1900; 1826-1891) 36. Mark Anthony Cooper (1800-1885) 37. Roswell King (1765-1844) 38. Land Lottery System 39. Cherokee Removal 40. Worcester v. Georgia (1832) 41. Georgia in 1860 42. Georgia and the Sectional Crisis 43. Battle of Kennesaw Mountain 44. Sherman's March to the Sea 45. Deportation of Roswell Mill Women 46. Atlanta Campaign 47. Unionists 48. Joseph E.
    [Show full text]
  • Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide
    Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Guide to the educational resources available on the GHS website Theme driven guide to: Online exhibits Biographical Materials Primary sources Classroom activities Today in Georgia History Episodes New Georgia Encyclopedia Articles Archival Collections Historical Markers Updated: July 2014 Georgia Historical Society Educator Web Guide Table of Contents Pre-Colonial Native American Cultures 1 Early European Exploration 2-3 Colonial Establishing the Colony 3-4 Trustee Georgia 5-6 Royal Georgia 7-8 Revolutionary Georgia and the American Revolution 8-10 Early Republic 10-12 Expansion and Conflict in Georgia Creek and Cherokee Removal 12-13 Technology, Agriculture, & Expansion of Slavery 14-15 Civil War, Reconstruction, and the New South Secession 15-16 Civil War 17-19 Reconstruction 19-21 New South 21-23 Rise of Modern Georgia Great Depression and the New Deal 23-24 Culture, Society, and Politics 25-26 Global Conflict World War One 26-27 World War Two 27-28 Modern Georgia Modern Civil Rights Movement 28-30 Post-World War Two Georgia 31-32 Georgia Since 1970 33-34 Pre-Colonial Chapter by Chapter Primary Sources Chapter 2 The First Peoples of Georgia Pages from the rare book Etowah Papers: Exploration of the Etowah site in Georgia. Includes images of the site and artifacts found at the site. Native American Cultures Opening America’s Archives Primary Sources Set 1 (Early Georgia) SS8H1— The development of Native American cultures and the impact of European exploration and settlement on the Native American cultures in Georgia. Illustration based on French descriptions of Florida Na- tive Americans.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    INCIDENTAL PROTECTION: AN EXAMINATION OF THE MORRILL TARIFF Jane Flaherty Thxa,c A&M University ABSTRACT Historians refer to the Morrill Tariff as the first statement of the nascent Republican party’s protectionist agenda, yet an analysis of the measure re veals that this enduring icon of historiography needs modification. Imple mented as a direct response to the fiscal crisis created by the Buchanan administration, the Morrill Tariff represents a bipartisan effort to augment federal revenue for a depleted Treasury. Both President James Buchanan and many of his Democratic colleagues in Congress urged revising the Tar iff of 1857 to arrest the growth of the federal deficit. However, the bitter rhetoric that accompanied the secession crisis has obscured the true nature of this short-lived, but important, revenue measure. An examination of the Morrill Tariff and the circumstances surrounding its passage demonstrate that it re-established the rates from the free trade Tariff of 1846 while pro viding incidental protection for select industries, a practice accepted, even advocated, by the Democratic party for over a decade. President Buchanan James Buchanan’s election to the presidency in 1856 proved a disappointing, if not disastrous, climax to an illustrious political career. He represented Pennsylvania in the House of Representatives from 1821-1831 and the Senate from 1834-1845. During his congressional career, he emerged as a leading, though never dynamic, spokesman for the Jacksonian Democratic principles of sound money, frugal government, and strict adherence to the Constitution. Though Buchanan served honorably in the Con gress, he distinguished himself through his foreign service as the minister to Russia from 1831-1833, secretary of state during the administration ofJames K.
    [Show full text]
  • Union Calendar No. 502
    1 Union Calendar No. 502 107TH CONGRESS "!REPORT 2d Session HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 107–801 REPORT ON THE LEGISLATIVE AND OVERSIGHT ACTIVITIES OF THE COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS DURING THE 107TH CONGRESS JANUARY 2, 2003.—Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 19–006 WASHINGTON : 2003 COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS BILL THOMAS, California, Chairman PHILIP M. CRANE, Illinois CHARLES B. RANGEL, New York E. CLAY SHAW, JR., Florida FORTNEY PETE STARK, California NANCY L. JOHNSON, Connecticut ROBERT T. MATSUI, California AMO HOUGHTON, New York WILLIAM J. COYNE, Pennsylvania WALLY HERGER, California SANDER M. LEVIN, Michigan JIM MCCRERY, Louisiana BENJAMIN L. CARDIN, Maryland DAVE CAMP, Michigan JIM MCDERMOTT, Washington JIM RAMSTAD, Minnesota GERALD D. KLECZKA, Wisconsin JIM NUSSLE, Iowa JOHN LEWIS, Georgia SAM JOHNSON, Texas RICHARD E. NEAL, Massachusetts JENNIFER DUNN, Washington MICHAEL R. MCNULTY, New York MAC COLLINS, Georgia WILLIAM J. JEFFERSON, Louisiana ROB PORTMAN, Ohio JOHN S. TANNER, Tennessee PHIL ENGLISH, Pennsylvania XAVIER BECERRA, California WES WATKINS, Oklahoma KAREN L. THURMAN, Florida J.D. HAYWORTH, Arizona LLOYD DOGGETT, Texas JERRY WELLER, Illinois EARL POMEROY, North Dakota KENNY C. HULSHOF, Missouri SCOTT MCINNIS, Colorado RON LEWIS, Kentucky MARK FOLEY, Florida KEVIN BRADY, Texas PAUL RYAN, Wisconsin (II) LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON WAYS AND MEANS, Washington, DC, January 2, 2003. Hon. JEFF TRANDAHL, Office of the Clerk, House of Representatives, The Capitol, Washington, DC. DEAR MR. TRANDAHL: I am herewith transmitting, pursuant to House Rule XI, clause 1(d), the report of the Committee on Ways and Means on its legislative and oversight activities during the 107th Congress.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas R.R. Cobb and the Law of Negro Slavery Paul Finkelman University of Tulsa College of Law
    Roger Williams University Law Review Volume 5 | Issue 1 Article 4 Fall 1999 Thomas R.R. Cobb and the Law of Negro Slavery Paul Finkelman University of Tulsa College of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR Recommended Citation Finkelman, Paul (1999) "Thomas R.R. Cobb and the Law of Negro Slavery," Roger Williams University Law Review: Vol. 5: Iss. 1, Article 4. Available at: http://docs.rwu.edu/rwu_LR/vol5/iss1/4 This Symposia is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at DOCS@RWU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Roger Williams University Law Review by an authorized administrator of DOCS@RWU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Thomas R.R. Cobb and the Law of Negro Slavery Paul Finkelman* From the Revolution until the Civil War Southern intellectu- als, professionals, and politicians developed and articulated elabo- rate defenses of slavery. The most significant proslavery legal scholar was Thomas R.R. Cobb, a Georgia attorney, law professor and one-time reporter for the Georgia Supreme Court. His trea- tise, An Inquiry into the Law of Negro Slavery in the United States of America,' profoundly illustrates the way antebellum Southern lawyers and judges used their learning and talents to support slavery. Proslavery advocates, such as Cobb, emphatically insisted on the justice and morality-the essential rightness-of slavery. Cobb believed that racially based slavery was a prerequisite for a truly "republican equality"2 because only in such a system were all whites equal in status, regardless of their wealth, property, or sta- tion in life.
    [Show full text]
  • Resources for Georgia Studies in Southern Historical Collection Ellen B
    Georgia Archive Volume 2 | Number 1 Article 2 January 1974 Resources for Georgia Studies in Southern Historical Collection Ellen B. Neal Southern Historical Collection Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/georgia_archive Part of the Archival Science Commons Recommended Citation Neal, Ellen B., "Resources for Georgia Studies in Southern Historical Collection," Georgia Archive 2 no. 1 (1974) . Available at: https://digitalcommons.kennesaw.edu/georgia_archive/vol2/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Georgia Archive by an authorized editor of DigitalCommons@Kennesaw State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Neal: Resources for Georgia Studies in Southern Historical Collection RESOURCES FOR GEORGIA STUDIES IN THE SOUTHERN HISTORICAL COLLECTION Ellen B. Neal* For many writers of Southern history, the Southern Historical Collection at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill has all the charm of an El Dorado. This great aggregation of manuscript material, covering every Southern state, supplies scholars throughout the nation with the unrefined ore for their work. The Collection grew out of the vision, dedication and persistence of Dr. J. G. deRoulhac Hamilton, who came to the University of North Carolina as a professor of history in 1906. From then until his death in 1961, Dr. Hamilton devoted himself to saving the rapidly vanishing raw material of Southern history from the dangers of "fire, flood, rats, mice, and energetic housewives."l By 1930 his work had attained such scope that the University Board of TruRtees created the Southern Historical Collection as a division of the Uni­ versity Library.
    [Show full text]
  • GEORGIA's HOWELL COBB STUMPS for JAMES BUCHANAN in 1856 by HORACE MONTGOMERY*
    GEORGIA'S HOWELL COBB STUMPS FOR JAMES BUCHANAN IN 1856 By HORACE MONTGOMERY* SOUTHERN unionists who had left the Democratic party during the crisis of 1850-51 made a valiant effort during the presi- dential contest of 1852 to prove their loyalty to the Democracy. Many of them were therefore bitterly disappointed with President Franklin Pierce's decision to reward the South by appointing to his cabinet two southern-rights Democrats. Among those who shared this disappointment was Georgia's Governor Howell Cobb. Like many Union Democrats, he believed the President had formed a government by joining fire-eater and abolitionist. To southern unionists like the Georgia Governor it made no sense to entrust the fate of the Union to the perilous adjustments which must of necessity issue from such a combination.' It was the judgment of Cobb that the sound approach to na- tional policy was to place the affairs of the Union in the hands of its friends. Distressed by the Democratic party's poor showing outside the South in the elections of 1854, he began late that year to plan toward this objective.2 Now in private life for the first time in over a decade, Cobb was just under forty years of age. Except for the part he had played in helping with the adoption of the Compromise of 1850, his public career had been inconspicuous. When the 31st Congress had opened in December, 1849, he was already a veteran of the lower house. Among his colleagues lie was known as a conciliator. Largely because of this reputation he had been declared Speaker after a protracted contest.
    [Show full text]
  • H. Doc. 108-222
    OFFICERS OF THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH OF THE GOVERNMENT [ 1 ] EXPLANATORY NOTE A Cabinet officer is not appointed for a fixed term and does not necessarily go out of office with the President who made the appointment. While it is customary to tender one’s resignation at the time a change of administration takes place, officers remain formally at the head of their department until a successor is appointed. Subordinates acting temporarily as heads of departments are not con- sidered Cabinet officers, and in the earlier period of the Nation’s history not all Cabinet officers were heads of executive departments. The names of all those exercising the duties and bearing the respon- sibilities of the executive departments, together with the period of service, are incorporated in the lists that follow. The dates immediately following the names of executive officers are those upon which commis- sions were issued, unless otherwise specifically noted. Where periods of time are indicated by dates as, for instance, March 4, 1793, to March 3, 1797, both such dates are included as portions of the time period. On occasions when there was a vacancy in the Vice Presidency, the President pro tem- pore is listed as the presiding officer of the Senate. The Twentieth Amendment to the Constitution (effective Oct. 15, 1933) changed the terms of the President and Vice President to end at noon on the 20th day of January and the terms of Senators and Representatives to end at noon on the 3d day of January when the terms of their successors shall begin. [ 2 ] EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, 1789–2005 First Administration of GEORGE WASHINGTON APRIL 30, 1789, TO MARCH 3, 1793 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES—GEORGE WASHINGTON, of Virginia.
    [Show full text]
  • Or Attaining Other Committee Members Serving in Higher Offices Accomplishments
    Committee Members Serving in Higher Offices or Attaining Other Accomplishments MEMBERS OF CONTINENTAL John W. Jones John Sherman CONGRESS Michael C. Kerr Abraham Baldwin Nicholas Longworth SECRETARIES OF THE TREASURY Elias Boudinot John W. McCormack George W. Campbell Lambert Cadwalader James K. Polk John G. Carlisle Thomas Fitzsimons Henry T. Rainey Howell Cobb Abiel Foster Samuel J. Randall Thomas Corwin Elbridge Gerry Thomas B. Reed Charles Foster Nicholas Gilman Theodore Sedgwick Albert Gallatin William Hindman Andrew Stevenson Samuel D. Ingham John Laurance John W. Taylor Louis McLane Samuel Livermore Robert C. Winthrop Ogden L. Mills James Madison John Sherman John Patten SUPREME COURT JUSTICES Phillip F. Thomas Theodore Sedgwick Philip P. Barboar Fred M. Vinson William Smith Joseph McKenna John Vining John McKinley ATTORNEYS GENERAL Jeremiah Wadsworth Fred M. Vinson, ChiefJustice James P. McGranery Joseph McKenna SIGNER OF THE DECLARATION OF PRESIDENTS A. Mitchell Palmer INDEPENDENCE George H.W. Bush Caesar A. Rodney Elbridge Gerry Millard Fillmore James A. Garfield POSTMASTERS GENERAL DELEGATES TO Andrew Jackson CONSTITUTIONAL CONVENTION Samuel D. Hubbard James Madison Cave Johnson Abraham Baldwin William McKinley Thomas Fitzsimons James K. Polk Horace Maynard William L. Wilson Elbridge Gerry John Tyler Nicholas Gilman SECRETARIES OF THE NAVY James Madison VICE PRESIDENTS Thomas W. Gilmer John C. Breckinridge SIGNERS OF THE CONSTITUTION Hilary A. Herbert George H.W. Bush OF THE UNITED STATES Victor H. Metcalf Charles Curtis Abraham Baldwin Claude A. Swanson Millard Fillmore Thomas Fitzsimons John Nance Garner Nicholas Gilman SECRETARIES OF THE INTERIOR Elbridge Gerry James Madison Richard M. Johnson Rogers C.B. Morton John Tyler Jacob Thompson SPEAKERS OF THE HOUSE Nathaniel P.
    [Show full text]
  • Verlyn Moore, Jr. James Mackay
    VERLYN MOORE, JR. JAMES MACKAY: Your Program Committee asked the History Committee of the Bar to arrange a special program today for a special reason: This is the 250 th anniversary of Georgia. It is the 161 st anniversary of the founding of this county. We are having this program in conjunction with the DeKalb Historical Society, which was founded by Carl Hudgins, who departed this life on October 15. Carl, many of you did not know because he has been ill the last two years, but he was admitted to the practice of law in 1915 and was still at it in 1980. And I don’t know anybody that has passed him, but one of our debts to this splendid man was that he founded the Historical Society, and the Bar and the Historical Society do all sorts of things together. Fay Hill [spelling?], the president of the Historical Society could not be with us today. Whit Smith here and Pat Davis are vice presidents of the Bar—I mean, of the Historical Society. Rick Shinall is in charge of the videotape history project. And I would like to give a round of applause to Howard Worthy, who recognized that this was a program worth videotaping and preserving in the archives of this county. Howard, will you stand up, since we’re not paying you, and let us applaud you? [laughter, applause] Now, there’s no better way to have a program than to have speak to you a person that would get the unanimous vote as having been cut out of the finest oak—human oak—in this state’s history, because the family has been a part of this community since 1837, just thirteen years after this county started.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Internal Politics in American Diplomacy
    Autopsy of a Failure: The Frustrated Career of the Union Party Movement, 1848-1860 Sean Patrick Nalty Kalispell, MT B.A., University of Montana, May 2004 M.A., University of Virginia, August 2005 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of History University of Virginia August 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………....1 CHAPTER 1 – Loosening Bonds of Party, Loosening Bonds of Union, 1848-1849…………..10 CHAPTER 2 – The “Partisan” Crisis of 1850…………………………………………......41 CHAPTER 3 – An Abortive Realignment, 1851-1852……………………………………….90 CHAPTER 4 – “The Test of Parties,” 1852-1854…………………………………………..139 CHAPTER 5 – The Balance of Power, 1854-1856…………………………………………186 CHAPTER 6 – “The Biggest and Best Party We Have Ever Seen,” 1857-1859……………...226 CHAPTER 7 – “We Are Going to Destruction As Fast As We Can,” 1859-1861……….257 BIBLIOGRAPHY………………………………………………………………………..292 Introduction The thesis of this dissertation searches for elements of continuity in the continued appeals for a national “Union Party” from roughly 1849 to 1861. Historians have explored various parts of this movement in a discrete fashion, but never has anyone attempted to examine the history of the effort to create a Union Party across the decade of the 1850s. What I find is that all incarnations of the Union Party stressed a common devotion to the rule of law, which they saw as under threat by sectional agitators who stirred up the passions of the public. Whether in debates over the right of the federal government to coerce a state, the legality of the Fugitive Slave Act, and presence of filibustering oversees, or the violence which attended partisan elections, Americans’ respect for the rule of law seemed at issue throughout that turbulent decade.
    [Show full text]