DOCSLIB.ORG

Elizabeth S. Anderson

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elizabeth S. Anderson ELIZABETH S. ANDERSON John Dewey Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies Arthur F. Thurnau Professor University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Department of Philosophy Angell Hall 2239 / 435 South State St. Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1003 Office: 734-764-6285 Fax: 734-763-8071 E-mail: [email protected] Web: http://www-personal.umich.edu/~eandersn/ EMPLOYMENT University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: John Dewey Distinguished University Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 2013-. John Rawls Collegiate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 2005-2013. Arthur F. Thurnau Professor, 2004-. Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 1999-2005. Associate Professor of Philosophy and Women's Studies, 1993-1999. Adjunct Professor of Law, 1995, 1999, 2000. Assistant Professor of Philosophy, 1987-1993. Swarthmore College, Visiting Instructor in Philosophy, 1985-6. Harvard University, Teaching Fellow, 1983-1985. EDUCATION Harvard University, Department of Philosophy, 1981-1987. A.M. Philosophy, 1984. Ph.D. 1987. Swarthmore College, 1977-1981. B.A. Philosophy with minor in Economics, High Honors, 1981. HONORS, GRANTS AND FELLOWSHIPS Fellow of the British Academy, 2020 Named One of World's top 50 Thinkers, Prospect magazine, 2020 MacArthur Fellow, 2019 Profiled in The New Yorker: Nathan Heller, "The Philosopher Redefining Equality," Dec. 31, 2018 Society for Progress Medal for Private Government, 2018 Nominee, Golden Apple Award 2017, University of Michigan President, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 2014-15 Nominee, Prospect’s World Thinkers 2014 Vice-President/President-Elect, American Philosophical Association, Central Division, 2013-14 Named John Dewey Distinguished University Professor, 2013 John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship, 2013 ACLS Fellowship, 2013 Michigan Humanities Award, 2013 (declined) Three Quarks Daily Philosophy Prize for 2012 blog entry, 2nd place Joseph B. Gittler Award, American Philosophical Association (for "an outstanding scholarly contribution in the philosophy of one or more of the social sciences," in recognition of The Imperative of Integration, 2011) Fellow, American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2008 Michigan Humanities Fellow (University of Michigan), 2007 Named John Rawls Collegiate Professor, 2005 Honorable Mention, Fred Berger Memorial Prize (American Philosophical Association), 2003 (for "Expressive Theories of Law") John H. D'Arms Award for Distinguished Graduate Mentoring in the Humanities, 2002. National Institutes of Health, 1999 ($430,465 over 3 years; co-PI. PI: Toby Jayaratne). Michigan Humanities Fellow (University of Michigan), 1999. Nelson Fellow (Philosophy Department), 1998-. Rackham Faculty Grant, 1996 ($14,400). Office of Vice President for Research Grant (with Toby Jayaratne, Research Scientist, Center for Human Growth and Development), 1995 ($14,000). Arthur F. Thurnau Professorship, awarded for excellence in undergraduate teaching, 1994-. Selected by The Philosopher's Annual as author of one of ten best philosophical papers published in 1991. University of Michigan College of LS&A Excellence in Education Award, 1991. Humanities Institute Fellow, University of Michigan, 1989-90. Emily and Charles Carrier Prize for Ph.D. Dissertation, Harvard University, 1988. Charlotte W. Newcombe Fellow, 1986-7. AREAS OF SPECIALIZATION Ethics, Social and Political Philosophy, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Feminist Theory, Epistemology ASSOCIATION MEMBERSHIPS American Academy of Arts and Sciences, American Philosophical Association (Central Division), American Political Science Association, AAUP, Human Development and Capabilities Association, Society for Analytical Feminism, Society for Progress PUBLICATIONS Underlined titles link to abstracts, or, for online publications, to full text. Books: Private Government: How Employers Rule our Lives (And Why We Don’t Talk About It). Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. translated into German, French, and Chinese excerpt in in Employee-Owned America The Imperative of Integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. ch. 3 and 7 reprinted in M. Bessone and D. Sabbagh (eds), Race, Racisme et Discrimination: Anthologie de Textes Fondamentaux (Paris, Hermann, L’avocat du diable, 2013). selections reprinted in Jonathan Wolff, ed., Readings in Moral Philosophy (New York: W.W. Norton, 2018). selections reprinted in Lee Ross, ed., Readings in Cultural Diversity and Criminal Justice (Cognella) selections reprinted in Magali Bessone, ed., Qu'est-ce que la discrimination? (Vrin) Value in Ethics and Economics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993. Excerpts (on ethical limitations of the market, and cost-benefit analysis) reprinted in Frank Ackerman, David Kiron, Neva Goodwin, Jonathan Harris, and Kevin Gallagher, eds., Human Well-Being and Economic Goals (Washington, D.C.: Island Press, 1997), pp. 36-40, 157-161. Excerpts (on surrogate motherhood) reprinted in Ira Ellman, Paul Kurtz, and Elizabeth Scott, Family Law: Cases, Text, Problems, 3rd ed. (Lexus Publishers, 1998), 4th. ed., (LEXISNEXIS/Matthew Bender and Co., N.Y., 2004). Ch. 8 (on surrogate motherhood) reprinted in Westend: Neue Zeitschrift fur Sozialforschung 1 (2006): 74- 87 (in German). Excerpts (on the environment) reprinted in in Jonathan Anomaly, Geoffrey Brennan, Michael Munger, and Geoffrey Sayre-McCord, eds. Philosophy, Politics, and Economics: An Anthology (Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2015). Articles: “Review of T. Piketty, Capital and Ideology,” Economics and Philosophy 37.1 (2020): 150–56. Https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267120000231 “Epistemic Bubbles and Authoritarian Politics,” in Michael Hannon & Elizabeth Edenberg, eds. Political Epistemology (Oxford University Press, 2021) “The Epistemology of Justice,” Southern Journal of Philosophy 58.1 (2020): 6-29 "Elizabeth Anderson Interviewed by John White," Journal of the Philosophy of Education, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9752.12336 "Workplace Government and Republican Theory," in Geneviève Rousselière and Yiftah Elazar, eds., Republicanism and the Future of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, 2019) "Moral Apprehension and Cognition as a Social Skill," Australasian J. Phil. 3.1 (2020): 26-34 Review Essay of Tommie Shelby, Dark Ghettos: Injustice, Dissent, and Reform, Mind 127.505, (2018): 276–284, https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzx022 “How to be a Pragmatist,” in Ruth Chang and Kurt Sylvan, eds., Oxford Handbook of Practical Reason (Oxford University Press, 2021). “Philanthropy and Income Inequality,” (with Ing-Haw Cheng and Harrison Hong), forthcoming in a volume on the future of capitalism, ed. Subramanian Rangan. “Rawls’s Difference Principle,” in Matthew Clayton and Andrew Williams, ed. The Cambridge Companion to A Theory of Justice (Cambridge UP, forthcoming). “The Problem of Equality from a Political Economy Perspective,” Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy, vol. 3, (eds. Sobel, Vallentyne, Wall) 2017, pp. 36-57. “Common Property: How Social Insurance Became Confused with Socialism” Boston Review, 25 July, 2016. "No Just Outcome" in Meira Levinson and Jacob Fay, eds., Dilemmas of Educational Ethics: Cases and Commentaries (Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press, 2016), 88-92. “Freedom and Equality,” in David Schmidtz, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Freedom (Oxford University Press, 2016). “Adam Smith on Equality,” in Ryan Hanley, ed., Adam Smith: His Life, Thought, and Legacy (Princeton University Press, 2016), 157-172. “Thomas Paine’s Agrarian Justice and the Origins of Social Insurance,” in Eric Schliesser, ed., Ten Neglected Classics of Philosophy (Oxford UP, 2016), 55-83. “The Social Epistemology of Morality: Learning from the Forgotten History of the Abolition of Slavery,” in Miranda Fricker and Michael Brady, eds., The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives (Oxford UP, 2016), 75-94. “Moral Bias and Corrective Practices,” Proceedings and Addresses of the APA 89 (2015): 21-47. translated and reprinted “Biais moraux et pratiques correctrices,” Pragmata 2019, pp. 176-213 “On Ralph Barton Perry’s ‘What Do We Mean by Democracy?’ ” Ethics 125.2 (2015): 517-520. “The Business Enterprise as an Ethical Agent,” in Subramanian Rangan, ed., Performance & Progress: Essays on Capitalism, Business, and Society (Oxford University Press, 2015), 185- 202. “Equality and Freedom in the Workplace: Recovering Republican Insights,” Social Philosophy and Policy, 31.2 (2015): 48-69. reprinted in Mark LeBar, Antony Davies, and David Schmidtz, eds., Equality and Public Policy (NY, Cambridge University Press, 2015), pp. 48-69. “The Quest for Free Labor,” Amherst Lecture in Philosophy, 2014. “Reply to Critics of The Imperative of Integration,” Political Studies Review 12 (2014): 376- 382. “Social hierarchies and a New History of Egalitarianism,” Juncture 20.4 (2014): 258-267. “Journeys of a Feminist Pragmatist,” Dewey Lecture, APA Central Division, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association 88 (2014): 71-87. “Human Dignity as a Concept for Economy,” in Marcus Duwell, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Human Dignity (Cambridge UP, 2014), 492-7. “Social Movements, Experiments in Living, and Moral Progress: Case Studies from Britain’s Abolition of Slavery,” Lindley Lecture, University of Kansas, 2014. “Outlaws,” The Good Society 23.1 (2014): 103-113. “The Fact of Unreasonable Pluralism: Comments on Joshua Cohen’s ‘Politics, Power, Public Reason,’ ” in Christopher Kutz, ed., Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Berkeley),
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Ethical Defense of Global-Warming Skepticism —William Irwin and Brian Williams Adam Smith on Economic Happiness —Douglas J
    REASON PAPERS A Journal of Interdisciplinary Normative Studies Articles An Ethical Defense of Global-Warming Skepticism —William Irwin and Brian Williams Adam Smith on Economic Happiness —Douglas J. Den Uyl and Douglas B. Rasmussen Direct and Overall Liberty: Areas and Extent of Disagreement —Daniel B. Klein and Michael J. Clark Violence and Postmodernism: A Conceptual Analysis —Iddo Landau Providing for Aesthetic Experience —Jason Holt Why Has Aesthetic Formalism Fallen on Hard Times? —David E. W. Fenner Austro-Libertarian Publishing: A Survey and Critique —Walter E. Block Discussion Notes Left-Libertarianism—An Oxymoron? —Tibor R. Machan Rejoinder to Hoppe on Indifference Once Again —Walter E. Block with William Barnett II Review Essay Review Essay: Edward Feser’s Locke and Eric Mack’s John Locke —Irfan Khawaja Book Review James Stacey Taylor’s Practical Autonomy and Bioethics —Thomas D. Harter Vol. 32 Fall 2010 Editor-in-Chief: Aeon J. Skoble Managing Editors: Carrie-Ann Biondi Irfan Khawaja Editor Emeritus: Tibor R. Machan Editorial Board: Jordon Barkalow Walter Block Peter Boettke Donald Boudreaux Nicholas Capaldi Andrew I. Cohen Douglas J. Den Uyl Randall Dipert John Hasnas Stephen Hicks John Hospers William T. Irwin Kelly Dean Jolley N. Stephan Kinsella Stephen Kershnar Israel M. Kirzner Shawn Klein Leonard Liggio Eric Mack Fred D. Miller, Jr. Jennifer Mogg James Otteson Douglas Rasmussen Ralph Raico Lynn Scarlett David Schmidtz James Stacey Taylor Edward Younkins Matthew Zwolinski Reason Papers Vol. 32 Editorial The editorial to volume 26 of Reason Papers began with this: Reason Papers was founded in 1974 by Professor Tibor R. Machan, who edited the first twenty-five volumes.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism Mathias Risse
    John F. Kennedy School of Government Harvard University Faculty Research Working Papers Series Can There be “Libertarianism without Inequality”? Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism Mathias Risse Nov 2003 RWP03-044 The views expressed in the KSG Faculty Research Working Paper Series are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect those of the John F. Kennedy School of Government or Harvard University. All works posted here are owned and copyrighted by the author(s). Papers may be downloaded for personal use only. Can There be “Libertarianism without Inequality”? Some Worries About the Coherence of Left-Libertarianism1 Mathias Risse John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University October 25, 2003 1. Left-libertarianism is not a new star on the sky of political philosophy, but it was through the recent publication of Peter Vallentyne and Hillel Steiner’s anthologies that it became clearly visible as a contemporary movement with distinct historical roots. “Left- libertarian theories of justice,” says Vallentyne, “hold that agents are full self-owners and that natural resources are owned in some egalitarian manner. Unlike most versions of egalitarianism, left-libertarianism endorses full self-ownership, and thus places specific limits on what others may do to one’s person without one’s permission. Unlike right- libertarianism, it holds that natural resources may be privately appropriated only with the permission of, or with a significant payment to, the members of society. Like right- libertarianism, left-libertarianism holds that the basic rights of individuals are ownership rights. Left-libertarianism is promising because it coherently underwrites both some demands of material equality and some limits on the permissible means of promoting this equality” (Vallentyne and Steiner (2000a), p 1; emphasis added).
    [Show full text]
  • CURRICULUM VITAE Bruce E
    CURRICULUM VITAE Bruce E. Bechtol Jr. Ph.D. Angelo State University ASU Station #10896 San Angelo, Texas 76909-0896 Cell Phone (540) 538-4273 Work Phone (325) 486-6792 Home Email Address: [email protected] Work Email Address: [email protected] Academic Background: Ph.D., National Security Studies, The Union Institute, Cincinnati, Ohio, 2000. Master of Arts in International Affairs, Catholic University, Washington DC, 1996. Master of Military Studies (Distinguished Graduate), U.S. Marine Corps Command and Staff College, Quantico, Virginia, 2001. Bachelor of Science in Liberal Studies, Excelsior College, Albany, NY, 1994. Current Position: 2015-Present Professor of Political Science, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX. Previous Teaching Experience: 2010-2015 Associate Professor of Political Science, Angelo State University, San Angelo, TX. 2007-2010 Professor of International Relations, Marine Corps Command and Staff College, Marine Corps University, Quantico, VA. 2006-2007 Visiting Adjunct Professor (Non-Resident), Graduate School of International Studies, Korea University, Seoul, Korea. 2005-2007 Associate Professor of International Relations Marine Corps Command and Staff College, Marine Corps University, Quantico, VA. 2005-2009 Adjunct Professor of Diplomacy (Online), Norwich University, Northfield, VT. 2003-2005 Assistant Professor of National Security Studies, Air Command and Staff College, United States Air University, Montgomery, AL. 2002-2009 Adjunct Professor of Liberal Studies (Online), Excelsior College, Albany, NY. 2001-2003 Adjunct Professor of National Security Studies and International Relations, American Military University, Manassas, VA. 1998-2003 Thesis Advisor, Master of Science in Strategic Intelligence Program, Joint Military Intelligence College, Washington DC. 1994-1997 Senior Instructor, Intelligence Systems, Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico, VA.
    [Show full text]
  • Lanthorn, Vol. 46, No. 46, February 27, 2012 Grand Valley State University
    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Volume 46, July 14, 2011 - June 18, 2012 Lanthorn, 1968-2001 2-27-2012 Lanthorn, vol. 46, no. 46, February 27, 2012 Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lanthorn_vol46 Part of the Archival Science Commons, Education Commons, and the History Commons Recommended Citation Grand Valley State University, "Lanthorn, vol. 46, no. 46, February 27, 2012" (2012). Volume 46, July 14, 2011 - June 18, 2012. 44. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/lanthorn_vol46/44 This Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Lanthorn, 1968-2001 at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Volume 46, July 14, 2011 - June 18, 2012 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 3Lantf)ornGRAND VALLEY ^ THE STUDENT-RUN NEWSPAPERS AT GRAND VALLEY. WWW.LANTHORN.COM W////////////////////////////////////////////s//////////////////////////////////////^//////////////////////////////W ^ VIEW------------------------------------------------- THE SLIDESHOW: ^ .lie, ncTU ,e ieeill! . ^ READ THE BLOG: INSIDE THIS ISSUE: 4 THE LANTHORN GOES ON AN EXCLUSIVE HAVE FUN ON SPRING BREAK 4, 'BACKTO SCHOOL': STUDENTS ARE y ^ TOUR OFTHE MARY IDEMA PEW LIBRARY TRAVELLING NEAR OR FAR V, INTHE SAME BOAT COME MIDTERMS y // www.lanthorn.com/multimedia ^ LAKER LIFE I B4 ^Ss www.lanthorn.com/blog /y. y///////////////////////////////////^^^^^ MONDAY, FEBRUARY 27, 2012 $3K EMBEZZLED FROM STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS BY CHELSEA LANE GVL STAFF WRITER he Grand Valley State University Police De­ partment recently closed Ttwo cases regarding two stu ­ dents embezzling a total of over $3,000 from student orga­ nizations Vertical Earth and the Synchronized Skating Club.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Syllabus
    Freedom Political Theory Project Course Description: Freedom has been called the greatest political concept of the modern world. But what is freedom? And if freedom is important, what should we do about it? Does freedom conflict with other important values, such as gender equality or distributive fairness? Can political systems that claim allegiance to freedom also make room for other values? Is the best society the one that cares only about freedom? Format: This is a demanding, reading intensive freshman seminar. As a seminar, classroom discussion is of the utmost importance. Be sure to complete all the readings before class meets each week, and come to class ready to join in the conversation. In this class, we are a team. So join in. Presentations: Each week, seminar will be opened by a brief presentation prepared by a team of two students. When it is your turn to present, your mission is NOT to teach the whole class, or to become world-class experts on the issues at hand. Rather, each presentation team is expected to study the assigned readings carefully, briefly summarize the main points, and to identify a few fundamental questions or challenges posed by the readings that they found most interesting (or confusing!). Requirements: 1. Students are expected to attend in each seminar, and to participate actively. We will allow one excused absence during the semester. Any additional absence will be penalized by a grade unit deduction from your final grade (so, if you had an A++, your final grade would be reduced to a measly A+, though of course if you had a B-, that would become a C+.
    [Show full text]
  • Quong-Left-Libertarianism.Pdf
    The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 19, Number 1, 2011, pp. 64–89 Symposium: Ownership and Self-ownership Left-Libertarianism: Rawlsian Not Luck Egalitarian Jonathan Quong Politics, University of Manchester HAT should a theory of justice look like? Any successful answer to this Wquestion must find a way of incorporating and reconciling two moral ideas. The first is a particular conception of individual freedom: because we are agents with plans and projects, we should be accorded a sphere of liberty to protect us from being used as mere means for others’ ends. The second moral idea is that of equality: we are moral equals and as such justice requires either that we receive equal shares of something—of whatever it is that should be used as the metric of distributive justice—or else requires that unequal distributions can be justified in a manner that is consistent with the moral equality of persons. These twin ideas—liberty and equality—are things which no sound conception of justice can properly ignore. Thus, like most political philosophers, I take it as given that the correct conception of justice will be some form of liberal egalitarianism. A deep and difficult challenge for all liberal egalitarians is to determine how the twin values of freedom and equality can be reconciled within a single theory of distributive justice. Of the many attempts to achieve this reconciliation, left-libertarianism is one of the most attractive and compelling. By combining the libertarian commitment to full (or nearly full) self-ownership with an egalitarian principle for the ownership of natural resources, left- libertarians offer an account of justice that appears firmly committed both to individual liberty, and to an egalitarian view of how opportunities or advantages must be distributed.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Why Not Capitalism? Richard J. Arneson [This Is the Not-Quite-Final Version of an Essay Published in Distributive Justice
    1 Why Not Capitalism? Richard J. Arneson [This is the not-quite-final version of an essay published in Distributive Justice and Access to Advantage, Alexander Kaufman, ed. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), pp., 207-234.] Should egalitarians oppose the idea of a capitalist market economy? This is an extremely vague and ambiguous question, but also an extremely important one. If left- wing ideas are to have a justified popularity, left-wingers should be clear as to what they are for and what they are against. If there is an egalitarian radicalism that offers a distinctive and plausible alternative to the philosophical liberal egalitarianisms of theorists such as John Rawls, Ronald Dworkin, Amartya Sen, and Thomas Nagel, egalitarian radicals need to articulate their rival vision. Anyone wrestling with these issues today owes an enormous intellectual debt to the late G. A. Cohen. For many years he worked with great success to determine what is living and what is dead in the thinking of Karl Marx, what exactly is wrong with the Lockean libertarianism of Robert Nozick, and why the grand social justice theory of John Rawls should be rejected despite its grandeur. Toward the end of his life he reworked an essay originally published in 2001 into a very short book, Why Not Socialism? The book directly addresses the vague and ambiguous question stated just above. Cohen suggests that when we reflect on the idea of an ideal camping trip among friends and consider (1) how it should be organized and (2) what is the content of the moral principles that the imagined camping trip satisfies, we get a conditional argument for a certain socialist organization of society.
    [Show full text]
  • Utilitarianism Egalitarianism Justice As Fairness Libertarianism
    egalitarianism utilitarianism What is justice as fairness justice? libertarianism What is justice? This question breaks down into a number of sub-questions. We can ask what it means for a person to be just. We can also ask what it means for an international system of distinct societies to be just. Today we are going to focus on the question of what it means for an individual society — which for our purposes we can take to be a nation — to be just. This question is sometimes called the question of distributive justice, because it asks about the just distribution of goods within a society at a time. What goods are we talking about? a society at a time. What goods are we talking about? One category is what we might call material goods. These include things like food and property and income. But these are not the only goods. Other goods include political rights (such as the right to vote) and liberties (such as the freedom to choose where one lives or whom one marries or what job one pursues). As we will see, there are others. This is enough to describe a society which most of us would agree to be unjust. At some initial time t, the members of a society are living in a state of relative equality. But at a later time t+1, some sub-group A takes all of the property of sub-group B. Group A consolidates its power, and enslaves the members of group B, depriving them by force of their political rights and liberties (such as freedom of association and the freedom to pursue an education).
    [Show full text]
  • Siriusxm Goes Gavel to Gavel with Convention Coverage
    NEWS RELEASE SiriusXM Goes Gavel to Gavel With Convention Coverage 7/7/2016 Unprecedented audio coverage across seven original SiriusXM channels including P.O.T.U.S. Convention Radio; Patriot; Progress; Insight; Urban View; Business Radio Powered by The Wharton School, and Radio Andy! Diverse perspectives and special content from Breitbart News, The Circus on SHOWTIME®, Yahoo News, Randi Zuckerberg, Dan Rather, and many more. Former NYC Police Commissioner Ray Kelly to kick off special series with "Securing a Convention" Plus live coverage from CNN, Fox News, Fox News Headlines 24/7, MSNBC, NPR, and more. NEW YORK, July 7, 2016 /PRNewswire/ -- SiriusXM announced today its comprehensive live coverage of the Republican and Democratic National Conventions as well as a wide-variety of political programming across a broad- range of its news, talk and entertainment channels. "SiriusXM's coverage of the 2016 political conventions will be broad, diverse, and unmatched in the audio space," said Scott Greenstein, SiriusXM President and Chief Content Officer. "Regardless of political persuasion, SiriusXM listeners will have choices like never before to hear every minute of each convention along with sharp political analysis and opinion across an unprecedented number of channels on our platform." Beginning Monday, July 18th for the Republican National Convention and Monday, July 25th for the Democratic National Convention, SiriusXM will transform its non-partisan P.O.T.U.S. (Politics of The United States) channel into "Convention Radio" -- featuring uninterrupted, gavel to gavel coverage from the convention floor. P.O.T.U.S channel hosts including Tim Farley, Michael Smerconish, Julie Mason, Michael Steele, and Rick Ungar will broadcast from each convention city, with White House Correspondent Jared Rizzi reporting live from the convention floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberty and Equality: Index
    Hoover Press : Machan (Equality) DP5 HPEQUAINDX 05-06-01 rev1 page 123 abolition of classes, 24–25 “Basis of Equity, The” Philosophy 75 absolute egalitarianism, 25, 27. See also (Cupit), 64n9 absolute equality Bell Curve, The,30 absolute equality, 9, 25, 63n7; Bell, Joshua, 57 comparison of, 26 table; Conspiracy benefits and harms,distribution of, xii, of the Equals, and, 23; critics of, 25; xviii egalitarian view of, 63–65; liberty Benn, Stanley, 73 and, 25 Bentham, 23 Agreement at Putney, 8n4 Berlin, Isaiah, xxii, xxiii, 11, 43n4 American Revolution, 8 Beyond Good and Evil (Nietzsche), Anabaptists, 7, 9 61n1, 65n13, 66n16 Anarchy, State, and Utopia (Nozick), Bonnet, 13 xivn10 Britain, xiii ancien re´gime, 57 British empiricism, 12 Anti-Duhring (Marx), 25n15 British Revolution, 8, 12 antiegalitarianism, 2 Burckhardt, 25 anti-individual, 32–33 Aristotle, 2–3, 4, 6, 13 Augustine, 4 Cabanis, 11, 13 autonomy, 29, 32 Calvinism, 7, 9 Canada, 56, 57 Career of Philosophy, The (J. H. Babeuf, Grachus, 23 Randall), 12n8 Bacon, Francis, 18 “Caring Relations and Principles of basic rights, 41, 109; natural ranking Justice,” Controversies in Feminism with respect to, xxii (Held), 78n54 Hoover Press : Machan (Equality) DP5 HPEQUAINDX 05-06-01 rev1 page 124 124 / Index “Case for Animal Rights, The,” In Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels: Defense of Animals (Regan), 77n52 Reader (Marx), 69n24 “Chance, Equity, and Social Justice,” Rending and Renewing the Social Order (Platt), 63n6 d’Alembert, 11, 18 Christian equality, 3–5; Reformation Dark Side of the Left:
    [Show full text]
  • SOY Volume 14 Issue 2 Cover and Front Matter
    Downloaded from VOLUME 14 NUMBER 2 SUMMER 1997 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001771 Social Philosophy https://www.cambridge.org/core & Policy The Welfare State . IP address: CONTENTS 170.106.33.22 DAVID SCHMIDTZ Guarantees , on DAVID T. BEITO "This Enormous Army": The Mutual Aid 25 Sep 2021 at 21:17:23 Tradition of American Fraternal Societies before the Twentieth Century STEPHEN DAVIES Two Conceptions of Welfare: Voluntarism and Incorporationism HOWARD HUSOCK Standards versus Struggle: The Failure , subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at of Public Housing and the Welfare-State Impulse THEDA SKOCPOL The G.I. Bill and U.S. Social Policy, Past and Future DANIEL SHAPIRO Can Old-Age Social Insurance Be Justified? PETER J. FERRARA Privatization of Social Security: The Transition Issue JAMES M. BUCHANAN Can Democracy Promote the General Welfare? H. TRISTRAM ENGELHARDT, JR. Freedom and Moral Diversity: The Moral Failures of Health Care in the Welfare State https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms LAWRENCE M. MEAD Citizenship and Social Policy: T. H. Marshall and Poverty ALAN WOLFE and Identity Politics and the Welfare State JYTTE KLAUSEN RICHARD A. EPSTEIN The Problem of Forfeiture in the Welfare State CAMBRIDGE . UNIVERSITY PRESS Downloaded from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500001771 Social Philosophy & Policy https://www.cambridge.org/core ISSN 0265-0525 Editor Ellen Frankel Paul Associate Editors: Fred D. Miller, Jr., and Jeffrey Paul Managing Editor: Harry Dolan Social Philosophy and Policy Center . IP address: Editorial
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Roots of Isolationism and Internationalism in American Foreign Policy Lane Crothers*
    Journal of Transatlantic Studies Vol. 9, No. 1, March 2011, 21Á34 The cultural roots of isolationism and internationalism in American foreign policy Lane Crothers* Department of Politics and Government, Illinois State University, Normal, IL, USA This article examines the question: why have Americans supported both internationalist and isolationist foreign policies at various points in history? It argues that part of the answer to this question can be found in the structure and nature of American political culture. American political culture frames the terms in which the programmes and plans debated by political leaders ‘make sense’ to the ordinary people whose consent is fundamental to the making of a democratic foreign policy. The article offers an account of the central components of American political culture that are shown to frame four core cultural orientations towards foreign affairs: Liberal Internationalism, America-as-Model, Nativism and Triumphalism. Two dimensions, Liberal Internationalism and America-as- Model, are illustrated through a discussion of contemporary arguments in favour of and opposed to the 1848 MexicanÁAmerican War. The article then offers suggestions of how the four categories of American foreign policy orientations can be applied in cases beyond the MexicanÁAmerican conflict. Both isolationism and internationalism are shown to be core components of American political culture. They are, as a consequence, eternal features of American foreign policy. Keywords: isolationism; internationalism; American political culture; MexicanÁ American War Introduction This article examines the question: why have Americans supported both inter- nationalist and isolationist foreign policies at various points in history? Why do they agree to send their troops to war (or not), to allow their money to be used to subsidise foreign nations (or not), or to intervene as foreign peoples face immeasurable suffering (or not)? Part of the answer to this question can be found in the structure and nature of American political culture.
    [Show full text]