Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
Separation of Synephrine enantiomers in Citrus Fruits by a Reversed Phase
HPLC After Chiral Precolumn Derivatization
Sohei Tanaka,*1 Misaki Sekiguchi,*1 Atsushi Yamamoto,*2 Sen-ichi Aizawa,*3
Kanta Sato,*4 Atsushi Taga,*4 Hiroyuki Terashima,*5 Yoshimi Ishihara,*1
Shuji Kodama,∗1†
*1 School of Science, Tokai University, 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka, Kanagawa
259-1292, Japan
*2 Department of Biological Chemistry, College of Bioscience and Biotechnology,
Chubu University, 1200 Matsumoto-cho, Kasugai-shi, Aichi 487-8501, Japan
*3 Graduate School of Science and Engineering, University of Toyama, 3190 Gofuku,
Toyama 930-8555, Japan
*4 School of Pharmacy, Kinki University, 3-4-1 Kowakae, Higashi-Osaka 577-8502,
Japan
*5 GL Sciences Inc., 30F, Tokyo Square Tower, 22-1 Nishishinjuku 6-chome,
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 163-1130, Japan
†To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Shuji Kodama, School of Science, Tokai University, 4-1-1 Kitakaname, Hiratsuka,
Kanagawa 259-129, Japan
E-mail: [email protected]
Hiroyuki Terashima: [email protected]
1 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
1 ABSTRACT
2 Racemic synephrine, which was transformed into diastereomers by derivatization with
3 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosil isothiocyanate, was resolved by a reversed
4 phase HPLC with UV detection at 254 nm. The total contents of synephrine
5 enantiomers in citrus fruit samples were exocarp > mesocarp > endocarp > sarcocarp,
6 suggesting that synephrine content of outer side of citrus fruits was higher than that of
7 the inner side. (R)-Synephrine was detected in exocarp of eleven fresh citrus fruits
8 except for lemon, lime, and grapefruit samples. (S)-Synephrine was determined in
9 exocarp of four citrus fruits (mikan, orange, bitter orange, and ponkan samples) and
10 the ratio of (S)-synephrine to total synephrine was 0.5−0.9%. The racemization of
11 (R)-synephrine in aqueous solution during heating at 100 °C was also examined. An
12 increase in the heating time brought about an increase in the (S)-synephrine content in
13 a linear fashion. The racemization was found to be significantly reduced by addition of
14 D-fructose, D-maltose, D-glucose, D-mannose or D-galactose, but not D-sucrose or
15 D-mannitol. It is suggested that the reducibility of sugars may result in the inhibition of
16 racemization.
17
18 Keywords: Enantioseparation; synephrine; diastereomer; citrus; HPLC.
19
20
21
2 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
22 Introduction
23 Synephrine (Fig. 1), a phenethylamine alkaloid, is known to be present in the peel
24 and the edible part of Citrus fruits.1-5 Since synephrine is structurally similar to
25 adrenergic agonist such as adrenaline, noradrenaline, and ephedrine, effects of
26 synephrine on the cardiovascular system are attributable to adrenergic stimulation. In
27 general, vasoconstriction occurs when ligands bind to α-adrenergic receptors, while
28 binding to β-1 adrenergic receptors result in cardiovascular contractility and increased
29 heart rate. Ligand binding to β-2 adrenergic receptors is associated with
30 bronchodilation.6 However, synephrine binds much more poorly to α-1, α-2, β-1, and
31 β-2 adrenergic receptors than other ligands such as adrenaline.7 Various studies have
32 shown that synephrine binds to β-3 adrenergic receptors, resulting in an increase in the
33 body’s ability to breakdown fats. Binding to β-3 adrenergic receptors dose not
34 influence heart rate or blood pressure, but regulate lipid and carbohydrate
35 metabolism.5 According to Stohs,5 synephrine exhibits greater adrenergic receptor
36 binding in rodents than in humans, while data from animals cannot be directly
37 compared to those of humans. Bitter orange extracts, which contain synephrine, are
38 widely used for weight loss/weight management, energy production, and sports
39 performance. Synephrine is a chiral compound and its enantiomers have been shown to
40 exert different pharmacological activities on α- and β-adrenergic receptors. That is,
41 (R)-synephrine is from 1 to 2 orders of magnitude more active than its
42 (S)-enantiomer.2,8
43 Synephrine has been analyzed by HPLC with ultraviolet detector,9-15 HPLC with
44 mass spectrometry,11,16-18 and Raman spectrometry.19 It was reported that the amount
45 of synephrine in citrus fruits was varied according to the citrus species, parts of fruits,
46 and the maturation period.9-13,16 Arbo et al. revealed a variation on the content of
3 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
47 synephrine in Citrus. sinensis according to the maturation period and found that its
48 content was inversely proportional to the size of the fruit.10 Synephrine enantiomers in
49 citrus fruit samples have been also separated by HPLC with chiral columns20-23.
50 Direct and indirect methods have evolved as the main strategies for the
51 enantioseparation.24-26 A direct method, which does not require chemical derivatization,
52 is based on a chiral stationary phase or with a chiral selector in a mobile phase on an
53 achiral stationary phase. An indirect method is based on the formation of
54 diastereomers by derivatization of analyte enantiomers with a chiral reagent. Gal and
55 Brown27 reported an indirect HPLC method for the chiral separation of adrenergic
56 agent including synephrine based in derivatizing with 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-
57 glucopyranosil isothiocyanate (TAG-ITC) under basic condition. But this indirect
58 method was not applied for real samples.
59 It was reported that (S)-synephrine in peels of six citrus fruits including mikan and
60 orange was not detected (less than 1 mg/100g) and that (R)-synephrine was the only
61 enantiomer isolated from citrus fruits.22 The same results were obtained using mikan23
62 and bitter orange,20 but Pellati et al.21 determined (S)-synephrine in fresh fruits pulp of
63 bitter orange, in which the ratio of (S)- and (R)-synephrines was 7.6:92.4. They also
64 reported that the ratio of (S)-synephrine to total synephrine extended over 4.8−14.4 %
65 in Evodia fruits.28 Kusu et al.23 found both (S)- and (R)-synephrines were detected in
66 two orange juices and a marmalade. They suggested that (S)-synephrine may possibly
67 be formed during production steps. Thus, it remains unclear whether (S)-synephrine is
68 contained in citrus fruits, or not. In order to clarify the question, we developed an
69 HPLC method for analysis of synephrine enantiomers in citrus fruits, citrus juices, and
70 citrus products after synephrine was derivatized with TAG-ITC at neutral pH. We also
71 studied the effect of sugars on the racemization of (R)-synephrine.
4 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
72 Experimental
73 Reagents and chemicals
74 Racemic synephrine and acetonitrile were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO,
75 USA). Methanol was from Kanto chemicals (Tokyo, Japan). (R)-(−)-Synephrine,
76 racemic octopamine, tyramine, and 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosil
77 isothiocyanate (TAG-ITC) were from Tokyo Kasei (Tokyo, Japan). Sodium
78 dihydrogenphosphate dihydrate and other chemicals (analytical grade) were obtained
79 from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation (Osaka, Japan).
80
81 Apparatus for HPLC and Mobile Phase Conditions.
82 The HPLC system consisted of a Jasco (Hachioji, Japan) model PU-2080 pump, a
83 Jasco Model UV-2075 detector, a Rheodyne (Cotati, CA, USA) manual injector, a
84 Shimadzu (Kyoto, Japan) column oven Model CTO-10Avp, and a Shimadzu degasser
85 Model DGU-14A. InertSustain C18 column (5 µm, 4.6 mm i.d. x 150 mm, GL
86 Sciences, Tokyo, Japan) was used. A mobile phase consisted of 20% acetonitrile, 20%
87 methanol and 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0). Elution was carried out at a flow rate
88 of 1.0 mL/min at 40 °C. Analytes were detected at 254 nm. Data acquisition and
89 processing were conducted with a Chromato-PRO (Runtime Instrument, Kanagawa,
90 Japan). For LC/MS analysis, an LC 7400 series (Hitachi) equipped with an Agilent
91 6140 quadrupole mass spectrometer was used. LC/MS separation was performed on a
92 InertSustain C18 column (3 µm, 2.1 mm x 250 mm, GL Sciences) with a mobile phase
93 consisting of acetonitrile/water/formic acid (40/60/0.1, v/v/v) at a flow rate of 0.2
94 mL/min at 40 °C. ESI conditions (positive ion mode) were as follows: drying gas
95 temperature, 250 °C; drying gas flow, 10 L/min; capillary voltage, 4 kV. 1H nuclear
96 magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded on a JEOL ECS400 (400 MHz)
5 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
97 spectrometer in CD3OD. Chemical shifts have been reported in δ ppm units with
98 reference to the internal standard tetramethylsilane (Si(CH3)4, 0.00 ppm).
99
100 Preparation of Racemic Synephrine Derivatized with TAG-ITC.
101 Stock solution of racemic synephrine (10 mM) was prepared with water, and stored
102 at −15 °C. TAG-ITC (20 mM) solution was prepared with acetonitrile. Solutions of
103 synephrine (100 µL), 200 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) (200 µL), and acetonitrile
104 (150 µL) and TAG-ITC (50 µL) were mixed. The mixture was incubated at 40 °C for
105 20 min and then synephrine derivative was analyzed by HPLC.
106
107 Sample Extraction and Preparation.
108 Thirteen brands of citrus fruits, four brands of dried citrus fruits, four brands of
109 citrus juices, two brands of orange marmalade, and a brand of canned mikan (Table 1)
110 were purchased from local markets. A bitter orange (Citrus aurantium) was kindly
111 gifted by JA Aira Izu. Mikan (Citrus unshiu), orange (Citrus sinensis), and bitter
112 orange (Citrus aurantium) were divided into exocarp, mesocarp, endocarp, and
113 sarcocarp. For other citrus fruits, exocarp was used. Citrus products were not devided,
114 whole products were used. Synephrine in each sample was extracted with a Microtec
115 (Funabashi, Japan) Physcotron homogenizer model NS-52 in 10 mL of 30%
116 acetonitrile. Then, the mixture was centrifuged at 1,200 xg for 5 min. The supernatant
117 was filtered with a 0.2 μm filter and the filtrate was applied to a Sep-Pak Plus Short
118 tC18 cartridge (Waters, Milford, USA). The first nonbinding fraction (0−2 mL) was
119 discarded and the next nonbinding fraction (2−3mL) was collected. The nonbinding
120 fraction was used as sample solution for derivatization with TAG-ITC.
121
122 6 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
123 Results and discussion
124 Factors Affecting Chiral Separation.
125 Generally, amino group could be derivatized with isothiocyanate under basic
126 conditions. Gal and Brown reported synephrine was derivatized with
127 2,3,4,6-tetra-O-acetyl-β-D-glucopyranosil isothiocyanate (TAG-ITC) in the presence of
128 sodium bicarbonate. We also derivatized synephrine with TAG-ITC at 40 °C for 20
129 min in the presence of 0.4% (v/v) triethylamine. The derivatized synephrine was
130 enantioseparated by reversed phase HPLC with an InertSustain C18 column using a
131 mobile phase containing 40% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid.
132 However, many minor peaks were observed around peaks of synephrine enantiomers.
133 This result was the same as that obtained using 10 mM tetraborate buffer (pH 9.2)
134 instead of 0.4% (v/v) triethylamine. We tried to examine the derivatization under lower
135 pH conditions using 80 mM phosphate buffer. The minor peaks were decreased with
136 decreasing pH of derivatized media. Native synephrine peak was not observed above
137 pH 7, and peak area of synephrine enantiomers at pH 7 or 8 was larger than that at pH
138 6. Therefore, pH 7 was selected for the derivatization of synephrine with TAG-ITC.
139 The derivatized racemic mixture was applied to LC(ESI+)-MS. The correct mass of
140 both ingredients gave peaks with protonation at m/z = 557, suggesting that (R)- and
141 (S)-synephrines reacted with TAG-ITC at a ratio of 1:1. 1H NMR spectra of synephrine
142 TAG-ITC adduct was compared with that of synephrine. Although most of the aryl
143 protons of synephrine were not shifted, the N-methyl and N-methylene signals were
144 shifted upfield by derivatization. It indicated that amino group of synephrine was
145 reacted with TAG-ITC.
146 The effect of reaction time (0−30 min) on the derivatization of synephrine with
147 TAG-ITC was examined using a reaction mixture containing 1 mM racemic
7 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
148 synephrine, 4 mM TAG-ITC, and 80 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 40 °C. Peak
149 area of derivatized synephrine increased with an increase in incubation time up to 20
150 min, and then kept constant up to 30 min. Therefore, the incubation time was
151 determined to be 20 min.
152 In our preliminary study, a mobile phase containing 40% (v/v) acetonitrile and 0.1%
153 (v/v) phosphoric acid was used and two peaks of synephrine enantiomers were well
154 separated (Fig. 2-A). However, when citrus samples were analyzed, matrix peaks were
155 overlapped with synephrine peaks. Thus, we investigated the effect of mobile phase
156 mixed with acetonitrile and methanol on the separation and the retention time of
157 derivatized synephrine (Fig. 2). Derivatized synephrine was enantioseparated by HPLC
158 at any ratios of acetonitrile and methanol concentrations. A mobile phase containing
159 20% (v/v) acetonitrile, 20% (v/v) methanol and 0.1% (v/v) phosphoric acid was used
160 for further experiments considering the higher separation, a moderately short retention
161 time of synephrine, and the better separation of contaminants contained in citrus fruit
162 samples. It has been reported that octopamine and tyramine were minor components in
163 citrus peels.9,12-14,21 Using the above HPLC and derivatization conditions, three
164 phenethylamines (racemic octopamine, racemic synephrine and tyramine, each 0.3
165 mM) were analyzed (Fig. 3A). These phenethylamine derivatives were found to be
166 well separated with the elution order of octopamine, synephrine, and tyramine, which
167 order was the same as that of native phenethylamines reported by using reversed phase
168 HPLC.9,12,13,21 Racemic octopamine was not enantioseparated by the above HPLC
169 method. Each peak area of racemic octopamine and tyramine was about half of the
170 total peak area of synephrine. Derivatization rates of octopamine and tyramine were
171 slower than that of synephrine, and this may be attributed to difference between
172 primary and secondary amines. The (R)-synephrine (0.5 mM), which is commercially
8 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
173 available, was derivatized with TAG-ITC, and the derivative was analyzed by the
174 proposed method (Fig. 3B). Since the peak corresponding to the (S)-synephrine
175 derivative was not detected, it was found that any racemization of (R)-synephrine did
176 not occur during derivatization process.
177 Synephrine was subjected to the proposed HPLC method using the above optimum
178 conditions. The limit of detection (LOD) of each synephrine enantiomer defined as a
179 signal-to-noise ratio of 3 was 0.0005 mM (0.0836 mg/100g) and the limit of
180 quantification (LOQ) of each enantiomer defined as a signal-to-noise ratio of 10 was
181 0.0015 mM (0.251 mg/100g). Linearity (r2 > 0.999) was demonstrated in the
182 concentration range of 0.0015−1 mM by each standard curve (9 points) for (R)- and
183 (S)-synephrines. The repeatability of five consecutive determinations was evaluated at
184 0.005 mM, 0.05 mM, and 0.5 mM for (R)- and (S)-synephrine. Good repeatabilities of
185 peak areas (RSD < 1.2%) and retention times (RSD < 0.2%) were obtained for both
186 enantiomers. Interday repeatabilities of peak areas and retention time in three days
187 (n=5, each day) were less than 0.4% and 0.3% RSD, respectively, at 0.5 mM for each
188 enantiomer. When a standard solution (0.3 mL) containing 83.6 mg/ L each enantiomer
189 of synephrine (final concentration: 50.2 mg each enantiomer per g samples) was added
190 to mikan, orange, and bitter orange peel samples (0.5 g), recoveries of (R)- and
191 (S)-synephrines were between 93 and 107%.
192
193 Separation of synephrine enantiomers in citrus fruit samples
194 Kusu et al.23 studied an HPLC method using a chiral column for synephrine in
195 Citrus unshiu and reported that synephrine content was mesocarp > endocarp >
196 exocarp > sarcocarp. On the other hand, Arbo et al.10 reported that its content was peel
197 > albedo > pulp. The (S)- and (R)-synephrine contents in Citrus fruit samples were
9 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
198 analyzed by the proposed HPLC method (Table 1). The representative chromatograms
199 were shown in Fig. 4. The total contents of synephrine enantiomers in mikan were
200 exocarp > mesocarp > endocarp > sarcocarp, and the same results were also obtained
201 with orange and bitter orange samples, suggesting that synephrine content of outer side
202 of citrus fruits was higher than that of the inner side. Synephrine was detected in
203 exocarp of eleven citrus fruits except for lemon, lime, and grapefruit (Tables 1 and 2).
204 (S)-Synephrine was detected in exocarp of a mikan (Citrus unshiu), two tangors
205 (Citrus unshiu × Citrus sinensis) and a ponkan (Citrus reticulate) and the ratio of
206 (S)-synephrine to total synephrine was 0.5−0.9%. (S)-Synephrine was detected in
207 exocarps of bitter orange, iyokan, dekopon, and hassaku samples, but the contents of
208 their samples were significantly low (0.08−0.25 mg/100g). Synephrine enantiomers in
209 products of citrus fruits were also analyzed (Table 3). (R)-Synephrine was detected in
210 three dried citrus fruits, four citrus juices, two orange marmalades, and a canned mikan,
211 but (S)-synephrine was not detected.
212
213 The effect of sugars on the racemization of (R)-synephrine
214 Pellati et al.29 studied the racemization of synephrine enantiomer. They found that
215 the racemizaton hardly occurred in buffer solutions at pH values between 3 and 8 at 80
216 °C after 48 h (less than 10% isomerization) and showed a possible mechanism of
217 racemization of (R)-synephrine in acidic and basic media. We also examined the
218 racemization of (R)-synephrine (0.5 mM) in aqueous solution at 100 °C (Fig. 5). pH of
219 the solution was 9.6. An increase in the heating time (2 h) brought about an increase in
220 the ratio of (S)-synephrine to total synephrine enantiomers in a linear fashion. The total
221 peak areas of (S)- and (R)-synephrines were not affected during heating, showing no
222 decomposition. Eroglu et al. reported the effect of thermal treatment on synephrine
10 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
223 content of bitter orange juice along with ascorbic acid and sugar contents, where no
224 significant effect on the total synephrine content was obserbed.30 It has been reported
225 that orange juices contain 4-6% (w/v) sucrose, 2-3% (w/v) glucose, and 2-3% (w/v)
226 fructose.31-33 When 0.5 mM (R)-synephrine was heated at 100 °C for 2 h in the
227 presence of 5% (w/v) D-sucrose, the production of (S)-synephrine by the racemization
228 slightly decreased. However, the racemization was found to be significantly reduced by
229 addition of D-glucose or D-fructose instead of sucrose. Since both D-glucose and
230 D-fructose are reducing sugars, the reducibility of sugars may result in the inhibition of
231 the racemization. In order to confirm the suggestion, effect of concentrations of several
232 sugars (3−100 mM) on the racemization of (R)-synephrine was studied (Fig. 6). Five
233 reducing sugars (D-fructose, D-maltose, D-glucose, D-mannose, and D-galactose)
234 suppressed the racemization of (R)-synephrine, but two non-reducing sugars
235 (D-sucrose and D-mannitol) did not affect the racemization. Among the five sugars,
236 D-fructose and D-maltose showed the strong suppression at lower concentration less
237 than 30 mM compared to other three sugars. Further studies are necessary to clarify the
238 mechanism.
239
240 In conclusion, using a derivatization with TAG-ITC, an HPLC method for the
241 separation of the synephrine enantiomers was developed. Generally, primary amino
242 group could be derivatized with isothiocyanate under basic conditions. However, the
243 optimum pH for derivatization of synephrine, having secondary amino group, with
244 TAG-ITC was found to be 7. Using the proposed method, synephrine enantiomers in
245 14 citrus fruits and 11 citrus fruit products were analyzed. A small amount of
246 (S)-synephrine was found to be detected in exocarp of a mikan (Citrus unshiu), two
247 tangors (Citrus unshiu × Citrus sinensis) and a ponkan (Citrus reticulate), where the
11 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
248 ratio of (S)-synephrine to total synephrine was less than 1%. Effect of sugars on the
249 racemization of (R)-synephrine during heating at 100 °C was also studied. D-Sucrose
250 and D-mannitol did not affect the racemization. However, an increase in the
251 concentration of D-fructose, D-maltose, D-glucose, D-mannose or D-galactose caused
252 a decrease in the racemization. Therefore, it is suggested that the reducibility of sugars
253 may result in the inhibition of racemization.
254
12 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
255 References
256 1. F. Pellati and S. Benvenuti, J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1161, 71
257 2. S.J. Stohs and H.G. Preuss, J. Funct. Foods, 2012, 4, 2.
258 3. J.-H. Kim and Y. Park, J. Exerc. Nutr. Biochem. 2016, 20, 20.
259 4. N. Bakhiya, R. Ziegenhagen, K.I. Hirsch-Ernst, B. Dusemund, K. Richter, K.
260 Schultrich, S. Pevny, B. Schafer, and A. Lampen, Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2017, 61,
261 1601020.
262 5. S.J. Stohs, Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 1463.
263 6. M.A. Inchiosa Jr., J. Obesity 2011, doi:10.1155/2011/764584.
264 7. S.J. Stohs and V.A. Badmaev, Phytother. Res. 2016, 30, 732.
265 8. C.M. Brown, J.C. McGrath, J.M. Midgley, A.G.B. Muir, J.W. O’Brien, C.M.
266 Thonoor, C.M. Williams, and V.G. Wilson, Br. J. Pharmacol. 1988, 93, 417.
267 9. F. Pellati and S. Benvenuti, J. Chromatogr. A 2007, 1165, 58.
268 10. M.D. Arbo, E.R. Larentis, V.M. Linck, A.L. Aboy, A.L. Pimentel, A.T.
269 Henriques, E. Dallegrave, S.C. Garcia, M.B. Leal, and R.P. Limberger, Food Chem.
270 Toxicol. 2008, 46, 2770.
271 11. K. Miyagi, T. Fujise, N. Koga, K. Wada, M. Yano, and H. Ohta, Food Sci.
272 Technol. Res. 2009, 15, 389.
273 12. D. He, Y. Shan, Y. Wu, G. Liu, B. Chen, and S. Yao, Food Chem. 2011, 127,
274 880.
275 13. R.M. Uckoo, G.K. Jayaprakasha, S.D. Nelson, and B.S. Patil, Talanta, 2011, 83,
276 948.
277 14. C.D. Lorenzo, A.D. Santos, F. Colombo, E. Moro, and M. Dell’Agli, Food
278 Control 2014, 46, 136.
279 15. P. Li, S.-L. Zeng, L. Duan, X.-D. Ma, L.-L. Dou, L.-J. Wang, P. Li, Z.-M. Bi, and
13 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
280 E-H. Liu, J. Chromatogr. A 2016, 1469, 96.
281 16. M. Bader, T. Lang, R. Lang, and T. Hofmann, J. Agric. Food Chem. 2017, 65,
282 4853.
283 17. P.A.S., Tette, L.R. Guidi, E.M.A.F. Bastos, and C. Fernandes, Food Chem. 2017,
284 229, 527.
285 18. P. Paiga, M.J.E. Rodrigues, M. Correia, J.S. Amaral, M.B.P.P. Oliveira, and C.
286 Delerue-Matos, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 99, 219.
287 19. Y. Zhang, C. Zhao, G. Tian, C. Lu, Y. Li, L. He, H. Xiao, and J. Zheng, Food
288 Chem. 2018, 240, 743.
289 20. F. Pellati, S. Benvenuti, and M. Melrgari, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2005, 37, 839.
290 21. F. Pellati, S. Benvenuti, M. Melrgari, and F. Firenzuoli, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal.
291 2002, 29, 1113.
292 22. F. Kusu, K. Matsumoto, and K. Takamura, Chem. Pharm. Bull. 1993, 43, 1158.
293 23. F. Kusu, K. Matsumoto, K. Arai, and K. Takamura, Anal. Biochem. 1996, 235,
294 191.
295 24. Srinivas, N.R. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2004, 18, 207.
296 25. R. Bhushan and H. Bruckner, Amino Acids 2004, 27, 231.
297 26. I. Ilisz, R. Berkecz, and A. Peter, J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 2008, 47, 1.
298 27. J. Gal, and T.R. Brown, J. Pharmacol. Methods 1986, 16, 261.
299 28. F. Pellati, S. Benvenuti, F. Yoshizaki, and M. Melegari, J. Sep. Sci. 2006, 29,
300 641.
301 29. F. Pellati, G. Canazza, and S. Benvenuti, J. Chromatogr. A 2010, 1217, 3503
302 30. E.C. Eroglu, Z. Baysal, M. Unlu, U. Seday, and Z. Karasahin, Indian. J. Pharm.
303 Educ. Res. 2017, 51, S412.
304 31. H. Kelebek, S. Selli, A. Canbas, and T. Cabaroglu, Microchem. J. 2009, 91, 187.
14 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
305 32. H.L. Peters, K.E. Levine, and B.T. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 453.
306 33. J. Velterop and F. Vos, Phytochem. Anal. 2001, 12, 299.
307
15 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
308 Legends for Figures
309 Fig. 1. Reaction scheme of synephrine derivatization with TAG-ITC.
310
311 Fig. 2. Effect of mixing ratios of acetonitrile and methanol in mobile phase on the
312 enantioseparation of synephrine. HPLC was conducted by using an InertSustain C18
313 column with a mobile phase consisting of 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) and
314 several ratios of acetonitrile and methanol at 40 °C. R and S represent (R)-synephrine
315 and (S)-synephrine, respectively.
316
317 Fig. 3. Chromatograms of racemic octopamine, racemic synephrine, and tyramine
318 (A), and (R)-synephrine (B) derivatized with TAG-ITC. HPLC was conducted by using
319 an InertSustain C18 column with a mobile phase consisting of 20% acetonitrile, 20%
320 methanol and 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 40 °C. R and S represent
321 (R)-synephrine and (S)-synephrine, respectively.
322
323 Fig. 4. Chromatograms of standard solution (A) and derivatized synephrine extracted
324 from exocarp (B), mesocarp (C), endocarp (D), and sarcocarp (E) of mikan sample A
325 in Table 1. HPLC was conducted by using an InertSustain C18 column with a mobile
326 phase consisting of 20% acetonitrile, 20% methanol and 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH
327 7.0) at 40 °C. R and S represent (R)-synephrine and (S)-synephrine, respectively.
328
329 Fig. 5. Effect of heating on the racemization of (R)-synephrine. (R)-synephrine (0.5
330 mM) (closed circles) or that with 5% of D-sucrose (open square), D-glucose (open
331 triangle) or D-fructose (open circle) were heated at 100 °C, and then, derivatized with
332 TAG-ITC. HPLC was conducted by using an InertSustain C18 column with a mobile
16 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
333 phase consisting of 20% acetonitrile, 20% methanol and 30 mM phosphate buffer (pH
334 7.0) at 40 °C.
335
336 Fig. 6. Effect of concentrations of sugars on the racemization of (R)-synephrine by
337 heating. (R)-synephrine (0.5 mM) with 3−100 mM sugars were heated at 100 °C, and
338 then, derivatized with TAG-ITC. HPLC was conducted by using an InertSustain C18
339 column with a mobile phase consisting of 20% acetonitrile, 20% methanol and 30 mM
340 phosphate buffer (pH 7.0) at 40 °C. D-Mannitol (closed squares); D-sucrose (open
341 squares); D-galactose (open rhombs); D-mannose (closed rhombs); D-glucose (open
342 circles); D-maltose (closed triangles); D-fructose (open triangles).
17 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
343 Table 1. Concentrations of (S)- and (R)-synephrines in each organ of fresh citrus fruit samples (R)-Synephrine (S)-Synephrine Name Species Organ (mg/100g) (mg/100g) A mikan Citrus unshiu exocarp 84.6 ± 0.90a 0.75 ± 0.46 mesocarp 72.7 ± 0.70 < LOQb endocarp 33.4 ± 0.72 < LOQ sarcocarp 6.5 ± 1.10 NDc B orange Citrus sinensis exocarp 24.1 ± 4.45 ND mesocarp 15.1 ± 1.01 ND endocarp 8.3 ± 0.22 ND sarcocarp 1.9 ± 0.96 ND
C bitter orange (daidai) Citrus aurantium exocarp 26.4 ± 0.87 < LOQ mesocarp 17.4 ± 0.96 ND endocarp 9.4 ± 0.96 ND sarcocarp 2.1 ± 1.03 ND 344 a mean ± standard deviation, n=3. 345 b less than 0.25 mg/100g. 346 c less than 0.08 mg/100g. 347
18 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
348 Table 2. Concentrations of (S)- and (R)-synephrines in exocarp of fresh citrus fruit samples (R)-Synephrine (S)-Synephrine Name Species (mg/100g) (mg/100g) D citrus fruit hybrid (kanpei) Citrus unshiu × Citrus sinensis 64.7 ± 0.92a 0.31 ± 2.73 E citrus fruit hybrid (setoka) Citrus unshiu × Citrus sinensis 92.6 ± 1.28 0.64 ± 0.97 F ponkan Citrus reticulate var poonensis 64.5 ± 0.60 0.47 ± 2.03 G iyokan Citrus iyo 50.4 ± 0.76 < LOQb H dekopon Citrus dekopon 25.3 ± 1.04 < LOQ I hassaku Citrus hassaku 12.2 ± 0.36 < LOQ J amanatsu Citrus natsudaidai 8.8 ± 1.30 ND K yuzu Citrus junos 12.1 ± 1.03 ND L lemon Citrus limon ND ND M lime Citrus aurantifolia ND ND N grapefruit Citrus paradisi ND ND 349 a mean ± standard deviation, n=3. 350 b less than 0.25 mg/100g. 351 c less than 0.08 mg/100g. 352
19 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
353 Table 3 Concentrations of (S)- and (R)-synephrines in citrus fruit products (R)-synephrine (S)-synephrine samples (mg/100g) (mg/100g) O dried citrus fruits round slice of orange 1.6 ± 1.02a NDb P round slice of citrus fruit hybrid (kiyomi) 3.5 ± 1.20 ND Q orange peel 2.1 ± 1.31 ND R segment of mikan 3.3 ± 0.98 ND S juices orange 2.5 ± 1.03 ND T orange 0.5 ± 0.60 ND U mikan 4.7 ± 1.77 ND V mikan + orange 2.2 ± 0.56 ND W orange marmalade 3.6 ± 0.56 ND X 0.7 ± 0.20 ND Y canned mikan 1.4 ± 0.66 ND 354 a mean ± standard deviation, n=3. 355 b less than 0.08 mg/100g. 356
20 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
357
21 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
358
22 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
359
23 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
360
24 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
361 362
25 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
363
26 Analytical Sciences Advance Publication by J-STAGE Received October 5, 2018; Accepted November 30, 2018; Published online on December 14, 2018 DOI: 10.2116/analsci.18P441
364 365 366 367 TOC graphic
27