DOCSLIB.ORG

1996 Mikhailov Check

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1996 Mikhailov Check Arthropoda Selecta 5 (1/2): 75-137 © ARTHROPODA SELECTA, 1996 A checklist of the spiders of Russia and other territories of the former USSR Ðååñòð ïàóêîâ Ðîññèè è äðóãèõ òåððèòîðèé áûâøåãî ÑÑÑÐ K.G. Mikhailov Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University, Bolshaya Nikitskaya Str. 6, K-9 Moscow 103009 Russia. Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ, óë. Á. Íèêèòñêàÿ 6, Ê-9 Ìîñêâà 103009 Ðîññèÿ. KEY WORDS: spiders, Russia, ex-USSR, faunistics, checklist. ÊËÞ×ÅÂÛÅ ÑËÎÂÀ: ïàóêè, Ðîññèÿ, áûâøèé ÑÑÑÐ, ôàóíèñòèêà, êîíòðîëüíûé ñïèñîê. ABSTRACT: A checklist of the spiders of Russia Ç+È mountainous Middle Asia, and other ex-USSR territories is given for the first Ê deserts of Middle Asia, time since Kharitonov [1932, 1936]. All valid Ë Kazakhstan hills, names, the main synonyms as well as nomina dubia Ì West Siberia, and nomina nuda are indicated. Í+Î Middle Siberia, Ï mountains of South Siberia, ÐÅÇÞÌÅ: Âïåðâûå ïîñëå ðàáîò Õàðèòîíîâà Ð Northeastern Siberia, [1932, 1936] äàí êîíòðîëüíûé ñïèñîê ïàóêîâ Ñ1 Far North-East, Ðîññèè è äðóãèõ òåððèòîðèé áûâøåãî ÑÑÑÐ. Ñ2 Kamchatka, Óêàçàíû âñå âàëèäíûå íàçâàíèÿ, îñíîâíûå ñèíî- Ñ3 Northern Kurile Islands, íèìû, ñîìíèòåëüíûå è ãîëûå íàçâàíèÿ. Ñ4 Commander Islands, Ò1 continental Southern Far East (Amur- Introduction Maritime area), Ò2 Sakhalin and Moneron islands, The checklist below is actually an extraction Ò3 Southern Kurile Islands. from a complete card catalogue of the spiders of the Republics: USSR started by the author in 1981. It is compiled ÐÔ Russia, almost exclusively as based on the literature data, Ýñò Estonia, with new materials mentioned only occasionally. Ëàòâ Latvia, Some calculations of the number of species between Ëèò Lithuania, different regions have already been published else- Áåë Byelorussia, where [Mikhailov, 1996ab]. Óêð Ukraine, Each spider species included in this checklist is Ìîëä Moldova (Moldavia), supplied with an attribution both to main physio- Ãð Georgia, graphical areas delimited after Gvozdetskiy [1968] Àç Azerbaijan, and to post-Soviet republics. Àðì Armenia, The physiographical areas and republics are Êàç Kazakhstan, coded by Russian litters and abbreviations, respec- Óçá Uzbekistan, tively. The sequence of references is as follows: Òóðê Turkmenistan (Turkmenia), Physiographical areas (see also Map 1): Êèðã Kyrgyzstan (Kirghizia), À Atlantic-Arctic insular area, Òàäæ Tajikistan. Á Fennoscandia (Karelian-Kola area), Synonyms are marked with a = sign, only names  Russian Plain, cited in the Russian/Soviet arachnological literature Ã1 Novaya Zemlya and Vaigach islands, are reported. Some old combinations not accepted Ã2 Urals, here are also incorporated without =. Valid subspe- Ä Carpathians, cies are mentioned with a + sign. For nomina dubia Å1 Crimea, and nomina nuda, all available sources are reported. Å2 Caucasus, Nomina dubia are given in the main list, whereas Æ1 Armenian Upland, nomina nuda are removed to the end of each family Æ2 Kopetdagh Mts., list. Doubtful identifications are marked with a ?, 76 K.G. Mikhailov Ñ1 Ã1 Ð Ñ4 Á Ñ2  Ñ1 Ä Ì Ñ3  Ò2 Ã2 Í+Î Ò1 Å1 Ï Ò3 Â Ï Å2 Ë Æ1 Ê Ç+È Æ2 Ç+È Map. Physiographical regions of the ex-USSR territory (after Gvozdetskiy, 1968). Explanations see in text. Êàðòà. Ôèçèêî-ãåîãðàôè÷åñêèå ðàéîíû òåððèòîðèè áûâøåãî ÑÑÑÐ (ïî Ãâîçäåöêîìó, 1968). Îáúÿñíåíèÿ ñì. â òåêñòå. misidentifications begin a separate paragraph and are Verzhbitskiy, Zawadsky instead of Zavadsky. Yet in marked with a ?? symbol. Species names recorded the list of references all such names are anglified as in the ex-USSR territory with doubts or definitely opposed to their latinized names used after their taxa erroneously are cited in figure brackets ({}) and in in the main list. regular brackets (), respectively. If necessary, new materials are supplied with Correct spellings of most Latin generic and indications of the museum in which they are kept: BI specific names have been checked after catalogues Zoological Museum, Biological Institute, Siberi- and the original sources, if necessary. Dates of an Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, publication of some papers by Savigny & Audouin, Novosibirsk. C.W. Hahn and C.L.Koch are established with the help of special literature sources [Brignoli, 1985; ACKNOWLEDGMENTS. I am deeply obliged Sacher, 1988; Sherborn, 1914; Tollitt, 1986]. to my colleagues and friends Drs. Yu.M. Marusik According to ICZN [1985], Article 33d, original (Magadan), A.V. Tanasevitch (Moscow), and D.V. species endings cannot be changed from -ii to -i. So, in Logunov (Novosibirsk) for valuable and numerous theory a lot of traditionally accepted names of Europe- comments on this checklist. I am also grateful to Drs. an spiders are to be changed: Maso sundevallii instead K.Yu. Eskov (Moscow), A.A. Zyuzin (Alma-Ata) of M. sundevalli, Pachygnatha degeerii instead of P. and V.I. Ovtsharenko (St.-Petersburg) for their degeeri, etc. I am not prepared yet to applying this rule remarks on earlier versions of my card catalogue. I directly, so I have simply marked all such cases in the greatly appreciate the bibliographical help by Dr. T. text of the current checklist by a double asterisk (**). Kronestedt (Stockholm, Sweden). The work is Only for synonyms some replacements have been made supported in part through the INTAS grant 94-3708. without special reference. Please note that the spelling of some Russian Checklist names has traditionally been non-English, mostly German: Bachwalow instead of Bakhvalvov, Chari- Atypidae tonov instead of Kharitonov, Mcheidze instead of Mkheidze, Michailov instead of Mikhailov, Pono- Atypus affinis Eichwald, 1830 marjov instead of Ponomarev, Saveljeva instead of Â. Áåë, Óêð, Ìîëä. Savelyeva, Tystshenko instead of Tyshchenko, Atypus magnus Namkung, 1986 Wagner instead of Vagner, Wierzbitzki instead of Ò1. ÐÔ. A checklist of spiders of Russia and other ex-USSR territories 77 Atypus muralis Bertkau, 1890 Zaitunia martynovae (Andreeva et Tystshenko, 1969) = A. anachoreta L.Koch in Ausserer, 1871 Ç+È. Òàäæ. Â, Ä, Å1, Å2, Æ2. ÐÔ, Óêð, Ìîëä, Ãð, Àç, Òóðê. Zaitunia monticola (Spassky, 1941) Atypus piceus (Sulzer, 1776) Ç+È. Òàäæ. Â. Ìîëä. Sicariidae Ctenizidae Loxosceles rufescens (Dufour, 1820) Sterrhochrotus ferghanensis (Kroneberg, 1875) Æ2, Ç+È, Ê. Êàç, Óçá, Òóðê. Ç+È, Ê. Êàç, Óçá. Òóðê?? Scytodidae Sterrhochrotus kitabensis (Charitonov, 1946) Ç+È, Óçá, Êèðã. Scyloxes asiatica Dunin, 1992 Ummidia gandjinoi (Andreeva, 1968) Ç+È. Òàäæ. Ç+È. Òàäæ. Scytodes bertheloti Lucas, 1839 Ê. Òóðê. Dipluridae Scytodes strandi Spassky, 1941 Æ2, Ç+È, Ê. Óçá, Òóðê, Êèðã, Òàäæ. Phyxioschaema raddei Simon, 1889 Scytodes thoracica Latreille, 1804 = Ischnotrhele strandi Spassky, 1937 Â, Ä, Å1, Å2, Æ1. ÐÔ, Óêð, Ìîëä, Ãð, Àç, Àðì. Æ2, Ç+È, Ê. Óçá, Òóðê, Òàäæ. Scytodes univittatus Simon, 1882 Æ2, Ç+È. Òóðê, Êèðã. Nemesiidae Leptonetidae (Amblyocarenum walckenaerii (Lucas, 1846)) Ç+È?? Óçá?? Leptonetela caucasica Dunin, 1990 Anemesia birulai (Spassky, 1937) Å2. Ãð. Æ2, Ê. Òóðê. Anemesia karatauvi (Andreeva, 1968) Pholcidae Ç+È. Òàäæ. Raveniola fedotovi (Charitonov, 1946) Artema transcaspica Spassky, 1934 Æ2?, Ç+È. Óçá, Òóðê? Æ2, Ç+È, Ê. Êàç, Óçá, Òóðê, Òàäæ. Raveniola ferghanensis (Zonshtein, 1984) Ceratopholcus maculipes Spassky, 1934 Ç+È. Óçá. Êèðã. Ç+È, Ê. Óçá, Òóðê, Òàäæ. Raveniola hyrcanica Dunin, 1988 Hoplopholcus forskali (Thorell, 1871)** Å2. Àç. Ê. Òóðê. Raveniola kopetdaghensis (Fet, 1984) Hoplopholcus longipes (Spassky, 1934) Æ2. Òóðê. Å2. ÐÔ, Ãð. Raveniola pontica (Spassky, 1937) Pholcus alticeps Spassky, 1932 Å2. ÐÔ, Ãð. Â, Å2, Ç+È. ÐÔ, Ãð, Àç, Òàäæ. Raveniola recki (Mcheidze, 1983) Pholcus crassipalpis Spassky, 1937 Å2. Ãð. Â. ÐÔ, Óêð. Raveniola redikorzevi (Spassky, 1937) Pholcus crypticolens Bösenberg et Strand, 1906 Ê. Òóðê. Ò1. ÐÔ. Raveniola virgata (Simon, 1891) Pholcus nenjukovi Spassky, 1936 = Brachythele arnoldii Zonshtein, 1984 Ç+È.- Óçá, Êèðã. Æ2, Ç+È. Òóðê, Òàäæ. Raveniola zaitzevi (Charitonov, 1948) Pholcus opilionoides (Schrank, 1781) Å2. Ãð, Àç. Â, Ä, Å1, Å2, Ç+È, Ê, Ò1. ÐÔ, Óêð, Ìîëä, Àç, Êàç. Á?? Mygale caucasicus Wagner, nomen nudum Pholcus phalangioides (Fuesslin, 1775) Å2. Ãð [Vagner, 1896]. Á, Â, Ä, Å1, Å2, Ê. ÐÔ, Áåë, Óêð, Ãð, Àç, Êàç, Òóðê. Pholcus phungiformes Oliger, 1983 Filistatidae Ò1. ÐÔ. Pholcus ponticus Thorell, 1875 Filistata insidiatrix (Forskal, 1775) Â, Å2, Ç+È, Ê. ÐÔ, Óêð, Àç, Êàç, Óçá. Å2, Æ2. Ãð, Àç, Òóðê. Pholcus sidorenkoi Dunin, 1994 Microfilistata tyshchenkoi Zonshtein, 1990 Â. ÐÔ. Ç+È. Òàäæ. Pholcus sogdianae Brignoli, 1983 Pritha crosbyi (Spassky, 1938) = P. fagei Spassky, 1940, praeocc. Æ2, Ç+È. Êàç, Óçá, Òóðê, Òàäæ. Â, Ç+È. ÐÔ, Êàç. Zaitunia beschkentica (Andreeva et Tystshenko, 1969) Pholcus velitchkovskyi Kulczyñski, 1913 Ç+È. Òàäæ. Â, Å1. ÐÔ, Óêð. Zaitunia maracandica (Charitonov, 1946) Spermophora senoculata (Dugès, 1836) Ç+È. Óçá. Å1, Å2. ÐÔ, Óêð, Àç. 78 K.G. Mikhailov Segestriidae Dysdera gmelini Dunin, 1991 Å2. Ãð. Segestria bavarica (C.L.Koch, 1843) Dysdera hungarica Kulczyñski in Chyzer et Kulczyñski, Ä, Å2. Óêð, Ãð, Àç. 1897 Ç+È?? Òàäæ?? + D. h. atra Mcheidze, 1979, Segestria florentina (Rossi, 1790) + D. h. subalpina Dunin, 1992 Å1, Å2. Óêð, Ãð. Â, Å1, Å2. Óêð, Ìîëä, Ãð, Àç. Segestria senoculata (Linnaeus, 1758) Dysdera imeretiensis Mcheidze, 1979 Á, Â, Ä, Å1, Å2. ÐÔ, Áåë, Óêð, Ìîëä, Ãð. Å2. Ãð. Segestria turkestanica Dunin, 1986 Dysdera incognita Dunin, 1991 Ç+È. Êèðã, Òàäæ. Å2. ÐÔ. Dysdera inopinata Dunin, 1991 Dysderidae Å2. Ãð. Dysdera karabachica Dunin, 1990
Load more

Recommended publications
  • University of Florida Thesis Or Dissertation Formatting
    ANIMAL RESOURCES IN ANCIENT MAYA ECONOMY AND EXCHANGE: ZOOARCHAEOLOGICAL AND ISOTOPIC PERSPECTIVES By ERIN KENNEDY THORNTON A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 © 2011 Erin Kennedy Thornton 2 To Dan and Sam 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Funding for this project was generously provided by the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies (grant # 06027), the National Science Foundation (grant #0622805), and the University of Florida Department of Latin American Studies. I would like to thank Antonia Foias, Matt Moriarty, Arthur Demarest, Tomás Barrientos, Elizabeth Graham, Wendy Teeter, Diane Chase, Arlen Chase, and the Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia de Guatemala (IDAEH) for granting permission to analyze the zooarchaeological remains used in this study. I would also like to thank Ann Heatherington, George Kamenov, John Krigbaum and Ben Valentine from the University of Florida for their assistance with the strontium isotope analysis. Appreciation is also extended to the Florida Museum of Natural History (Gainesville, Florida) for providing access to the modern comparative collections used to identify the zooarchaeological assemblages. I am indebted to my superb advisor, Kitty Emery, for her constant patience, support, guidance and friendship throughout my graduate career. Her insights and advice were invaluable. She also generously involved me in her own research projects, which provided not only additional research and museum experience, but also paid employment, which allowed me to continue my graduate studies when other sources of funding were unavailable. I also extend my gratitude to my other committee members Susan deFrance, Susan Milbrath, John Krigbaum and Mel Sunquist for their valuable feedback regarding various aspects of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • KISHIDAIA, No.117, Aug
    ＫＩＳＨＩＤＡＩＡ Bulletin of Tokyo Spider Study Group No.117, Aug. 2020 ─ 目 次 ─ 奥村賢一：ヤチグモ類奇形個体の事例 ……………........................…………................………...….. 1 馬場友希・河野勝行：アマミホウシグモによるコヒゲジロハサミムシの捕食 …..................…….…. 4 馬場友希・吉田 譲：福島県からのババハシリグモの初記録 .....................................................… 7 新海 明：スズミグモの網構造の再検討 ………................................…………................…..…….. 9 鈴木佑弥：野外におけるシラホシコゲチャハエトリの雄間闘争の観察 …………...............………..… 14 鈴木佑弥・奥村賢一：静岡県におけるヤクチビヤチグモの記録 ................................................... 18 鈴木佑弥・安藤昭久：イッカクコブガシラヌカグモ (新称) の分布記録 ....................................... 22 平松毅久・嶋田順一：晩秋の奥武蔵にカネコトタテグモを探して ................................................ 27 平松毅久：埼玉県でムナアカナルコグモを採集 ......................................................................... 31 長井聡道：ヤスダコモリグモの生態 ........................................................................................ 34 平松毅久：本土産ナルコグモと卵のうが微妙に違う南西諸島産 Wendilgarda （カラカラグモ科） .... 39 DRAGLINES 馬場友希・中島 淳：福岡県におけるマダラフクログモの初記録 ….......................................... 44 馬場友希・中島 淳・奥村賢一：福岡県北九州市白島 (男島) におけるクモの追加記録 .............. 45 笹岡文雄：プランターから採集されたナナメケシグモ ..…………......…….…….…...............…….. 46 嶋田順一：「はやにえ」にされたジョロウクモを見て思うこと ….............................................. 46 嶋田順一・吉野光代：天覧山でクモタケが大量発生 …………...............…………......................... 48 加藤俊英・馬場友希：ワイノジハエトリの千葉県からの採集記録 …………..…..................………. 50 林 成多・馬場友希：島根県東部のイソハエトリ ...…………….…………………................………. 51 遠藤鴻明・内田翔太・篠部将太朗・谷川明男：南大東島で採集されたクモ ................................. 53 遠藤鴻明：青ヶ島で採集されたクモ …….....................................................................…….….
    [Show full text]
  • Kishidaia117 号「千葉県で採集したクモ類」の訂正 ………….………
    ＫＩＳＨＩＤＡＩＡ Bulletin of Tokyo Spider Study Group No.118, Feb. 2021 ─ 目 次 ─ 池田健一：関西で確認された野外におけるクモ類の捕食例 …….......…………................………...….. 1 須黒達巳：Twitter を用いたヨダンハエトリ Marpissa pulla の分布調査の試み …................…….…. 7 馬場友希・村田遼大・松本吏樹郎・高田まゆら： ハネナシヒメバチ属の一種によるウヅキコモリグモの卵のうへの寄生 ...................… 12 平松毅久：シロオビカラカラグモ Zoma dibaiyin －生活史覚え書き－ ………..................…..…….. 14 平松毅久：「このクモを探せ !! 」の明日はどっちだ ?! No.7 －オノゴミグモ－ …...............………..… 24 信太理央：日本産 Mallinella 属による野外および飼育下における数例の捕食観察例 ....................... 28 鈴木佑弥：このクモをさがせ No.08 ムナアカナルコグモ ............................................................ 33 鈴木佑弥：“昼行性”円網グモ類の夜食に関する予備観察 .......................................................... 38 鈴木佑弥：スズミグモは造網時にヨコ糸張り方向を切り替える ...................................................... 46 鈴木佑弥：キジロオヒキグモの季節消長について ....................................................................... 50 遠藤鴻明：普通種リスト Ver. 2020 ......................................................................................... 58 長井聡道：メスを狩ろうとしたヤマヤチグモ雄 .......................................................................... 65 谷川明男：ミナミコモリグモとハテコモリグモ .......................................................................... 68 長野宏紀：ヤンバルキムラグモの胸内板の腹突起の数と付着する筋肉の付着位置 ........................... 71 DRAGLINES 林 俊夫：ツシマトリノフンダマシを群馬県で採集 ................................................................. 74 谷川明男・勝山礼一朗：東京都におけるブンゴキムラグモの発見 ..…………......…….……….......... 74 谷川明男・新海 明：九州でのキムラグモ類の分布上限 …........................................................ 75 谷川明男：キムラグモ類のオスがいっぱい …………...........................…………........................
    [Show full text]
  • Enlisting the Diversity of Orb-Weavers of Asia As Well As Endemic Orb-Weaving Species of India
    © 2016. Indian Journal of Arachnology 5 (1-2): 176-304 ISSN 2278-1587 (Online) ENLISTING THE DIVERSITY OF ORB-WEAVERS OF ASIA AS WELL AS ENDEMIC ORB-WEAVING SPECIES OF INDIA Anuradha Rajoria* and Harishant Jadhao** *Department of Zoology, Sant Gadge Baba Amravati University, Maharashtra [email protected], ** [email protected] ABSTRACT The present enlisting of the orb-weavers of Asia is done in order to understand the generic as well as species abundance of the orb-weaving families which are recorded from Asian continent till date. This enlisting also highlights the species of the orb-weaving families which are endemic to India. This is a simple, sorted compilation of the diversity of Asian Orb-weavers. Keywords: Asia, India, Araneae, endemic, orb-weavers, spider fauna. INTRODUCTION “Orb-Weavers” as we know, are the most common group of builders of spiral wheel- shaped webs often found in gardens, fields and forests. Their common name is taken from the round shape of this typical web, and the taxon was formerly also referred to as the Orbiculariae and are basically categorized under the Superfamilies Araneoidea, Cyatholipoidea, Deinopoidea, Linyphioidea, Symphytognathoidea and Theridioidea. A total of 20 families are categorised within these superfamilies, while Asian continent records 15 families viz., Anapidae Simon, 1895; Araneidae Clerck, 1757; Deinopidae C.L. Koch, 1850; Linyphiidae Blackwall, 1859; Mimetidae Simon, 1881; Mysmenidae Petrunkevitch, 1928; Nephilidae Simon, 1894; Nesticidae Simon, 1894; Pimoidae Wunderlich, 1986; Symphytognathidae Hickman, 1931; Synaphridae Wunderlich, 1986; Tetragnathidae Menge, 1866; Theridiidae Sundevall, 1833; Theridiosomatidae Simon, 1881 and Uloboridae Thorell, 1869. MATERIALS AND METHODS The present work is based on the review of the orb-weaving families which are included in Platnick’s World Spider Catalog and recently uploaded online version of World Spider Catalog (2016) and also by consulting published books, materials and available literature.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue, Vol. 65 No. 1
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 65 Number 1 Article 23 1-27-2005 Full Issue, Vol. 65 No. 1 Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation (2005) "Full Issue, Vol. 65 No. 1," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 65 : No. 1 , Article 23. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol65/iss1/23 This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 65(1), © 2005, pp. 1–10 FUNCTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS OF WILDERNESS STREAMS TWENTY YEARS FOLLOWING WILDFIRE Christopher T. Robinson1, Urs Uehlinger1, and G. Wayne Minshall2 ABSTRACT.—We compared functional attributes of streams draining catchments burned by wildfire 20 years previ- ously to those of streams in unburned catchments. Long-term analyses of channel profiles indicated most channel change occurred within the first 10 years after fire with little subsequent change the following 10 years. Much of the standing dead timber had fallen, and its effect on stream morphology was directly related to stream size, with important ramifications for future years as decay progresses. The volume of wood in the active channel was 5X higher in a 3rd- order burn stream than in other burn or reference streams, but >80% of this wood was still bridging the stream. Reten- tion of leaves was strongly associated with channel morphology and location of debris dams.
    [Show full text]
  • (Arachnida, Aranei) Каталог Пауков
    ÈÑÑËÅÄÎÂÀÍÈß ÏÎ ÔÀÓÍÅ Catalogue of the spiders of the territories of the former So- viet Union (Arachnida, Aranei) by Kirill G. Mikhailov Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ òåððèòîðèé áûâøåãî Ñîâåòñêîãî Ñîþçà (Arachnida, Aranei) Ê.Ã. Ìèõàéëîâ Moscow Ìîñêâà 1997 ÑÁÎÐÍÈÊ ÒÐÓÄΠÇÎÎËÎÃÈ×ÅÑÊÎÃÎ ÌÓÇÅß ÌÃÓ òîì XXXVII ARCHIVES OF THE ZOOLOGICAL MUSEUM OF THE MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY Vol. XXXVII Ãëàâíûé ðåäàêòîð Î.Ë. Ðîññîëèìî Editor-in-chief O.L. Rossolimo Mikhailov K.G. Catalogue of the spiders of the territories of the former Soviet Union (Arachnida, Aranei). Moscow: Zoological Museum of the Moscow State University. 1997. 416 pp. Ìèõàéëîâ Ê.Ã. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ (Arachnida, Aranei) òåððèòî- ðèé áûâøåãî Ñîâåòñêîãî Ñîþçà. Ìîñêâà: Çîîëîãè÷åñêèé ìóçåé ÌÃÓ. 1997. 416 ñ. A complete catalogue of the spiders of Russia and other former USSR territories is given for the first time. All literature data since the 18th century until August 1996 are compiled. Comparative calculations of the number of spider species in different physio- graphical areas and post-Soviet republics are provided (Chapter 1). A checklist of spiders (Chapter 2) comprises 2,694 species belonging to 473 genera and 49 families. Each species included is supplied with an attribution to both physiographical area(s) and republic(s). Necessary synonymies and valid subspecies are also enlisted, same as nomina dubia and nomina nuda. Correct spellings of most Latin generic and specific names is checked. A bibliographical index (Chapter 3) comprises over 1,900 citations. Destined for zoologists, mainly entomologists and arachnologists, as well as for local biologists and naturalists. Âïåðâûå ñîñòàâëåí ïîëíûé êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ Ðîññèè è äðóãèõ òåððèòîðèé áûâøåãî ÑÑÑÐ, âêëþ÷àÿ Ïðèáàëòèêó.
    [Show full text]