DOCSLIB.ORG

Kishidaia117 号「千葉県で採集したクモ類」の訂正 ………….………

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Kishidaia117 号「千葉県で採集したクモ類」の訂正 ………….……… ＫＩＳＨＩＤＡＩＡ Bulletin of Tokyo Spider Study Group No.118, Feb. 2021 ─ 目 次 ─ 池田健一：関西で確認された野外におけるクモ類の捕食例 …….......…………................………...….. 1 須黒達巳：Twitter を用いたヨダンハエトリ Marpissa pulla の分布調査の試み …................…….…. 7 馬場友希・村田遼大・松本吏樹郎・高田まゆら： ハネナシヒメバチ属の一種によるウヅキコモリグモの卵のうへの寄生 ...................… 12 平松毅久：シロオビカラカラグモ Zoma dibaiyin －生活史覚え書き－ ………..................…..…….. 14 平松毅久：「このクモを探せ !! 」の明日はどっちだ ?! No.7 －オノゴミグモ－ …...............………..… 24 信太理央：日本産 Mallinella 属による野外および飼育下における数例の捕食観察例 ....................... 28 鈴木佑弥：このクモをさがせ No.08 ムナアカナルコグモ ............................................................ 33 鈴木佑弥：“昼行性”円網グモ類の夜食に関する予備観察 .......................................................... 38 鈴木佑弥：スズミグモは造網時にヨコ糸張り方向を切り替える ...................................................... 46 鈴木佑弥：キジロオヒキグモの季節消長について ....................................................................... 50 遠藤鴻明：普通種リスト Ver. 2020 ......................................................................................... 58 長井聡道：メスを狩ろうとしたヤマヤチグモ雄 .......................................................................... 65 谷川明男：ミナミコモリグモとハテコモリグモ .......................................................................... 68 長野宏紀：ヤンバルキムラグモの胸内板の腹突起の数と付着する筋肉の付着位置 ........................... 71 DRAGLINES 林 俊夫：ツシマトリノフンダマシを群馬県で採集 ................................................................. 74 谷川明男・勝山礼一朗：東京都におけるブンゴキムラグモの発見 ..…………......…….……….......... 74 谷川明男・新海 明：九州でのキムラグモ類の分布上限 …........................................................ 75 谷川明男：キムラグモ類のオスがいっぱい …………...........................…………......................... 77 馬場友希・島野智之：沖縄島と与那国島で採集されたクモ ………..........…..…..................………. 79 坂本龍生・馬場友希：東京都におけるイソハエトリの記録 ...…………….………................………. 80 馬場友希・盛口 満：沖縄島におけるホムラハエトリの初記録 ................................................... 81 釣舟富紀子・馬場友希：宮城県からのヒゲナガツヤグモの初記録 …….............................…….…. 82 松木伸浩・三田村敏正・馬場友希：福島県初記録のヒカリアシナガグモ …................................… 83 中島 淳・馬場友希：ヘリジロハシリグモによるオタマジャクシの捕食 ………….............………… 84 松島良介・鈴木佑弥：ナガコガネグモによるシマゲンゴロウの捕食事例 …….........................…... 85 鈴木佑弥：イエユウレイグモがシボグモ雄およびジグモ雄を捕食 …....…………….................…… 86 鈴木佑弥：クモによるイトトンボ類の捕食事例 ……………………...................…................…….. 87 鈴木佑弥：網上におけるジョロウグモ雌同士の闘争行動 ……………….................…………...…….. 88 鈴木佑弥： Kishidaia117 号「千葉県で採集したクモ類」の訂正 ………….………................…….. 89 池田健一：モエギザトウムシのヒメツユムシ捕食例 ………............................…................…….. 90 田中一裕：北海道におけるマダラヒメグモの初記録 ................................................................. 91 雄介・稲畑憲昭：和歌山県串本町でオオヒラタザトウムシ西日本亜種を採集 ......................... 92 雄介・藤本博文：小豆島 (香川県) におけるゴホントゲザトウムシの追加記録…..……….…….. 94 西 風太：京都府におけるアシマダラヤリグモの記録 ............................................................... 95 遠藤鴻明：Kishidaia No.117, Aug. 2020 「奄美大島で採集されたクモ」についての訂正とお詫び . 96 田谷昌仁・細谷 淳・遠藤鴻明：アマサギが捕食したクモ ........................................................ 96 嶋田順一：埼玉県で採集・観察された気になる蜘蛛 ................................................................. 98 嶋田順一：マダラヒメグモの網に残っていた虫達 .................................................................... 99 野口奨悟：佐賀県におけるマイコフクログモの記録 ................................................................... 100 長井聡道：コノハサラグモの網を確認 ..................................................................................... 101 平松毅久：ユアギグモ Patu kishidai Shinkai 2009 の観察記録 ................................................ 103 芹田凌平：高知県でホシミジングモを採集 ............................................................................. 104 芹田凌平：高知県でミナミハヤテグモを採集 ........................................................................... 105 石田裕一・野村昭英：北海道でジョロウグモ Trichonephila clavata を確認 ……………………….... 106 中谷優介・松元音旺・相知紀史：宮崎県におけるオオクマコブヌカグモの発見 ............................ 107 相知紀史・信太理央：鹿児島県肝属郡でオオジョロウグモとヤマシログモを採集 .......................... 108 鈴木佑弥・藏滿司夢・古崎敦也：奄美大島においてマレーゼトラップにより採集されたクモ ......... 109 馬場友希・久末 遊：福岡県で採集されたクモ …….....………….…………….................................. 111 馬場友希・田中幸一：島根県の水田で採集されたクモ ................................................................. 115 菅波洋平：東北 3 県 (岩手・宮城・山形) の土壌から採集されたクモ類 ……….……................. 119 菅波洋平：新潟県の土壌から採集されたクモ類 ……….......................................……................… 123 辻 雄介・久末 遊：福岡県におけるゴホントゲザトウムシの採集記録 ....................................… 127 久保田直：福岡県三里松原の樹上性ササラダニ類 …………………………………………................. 130 奥村賢一：2020 年 11 月に佐渡島で採集したクモ類 .................................................................. 137 新海栄一：東京都産クモ類 ..................................................................................................... 141 馬場友希：長野県上田市の椀子ヴィンヤードで採集されたクモ ……………...……………................. 212 鈴木佑弥・寺田昂平：奥多摩で採集したクモ .............................................................................. 221 鈴木佑弥：茨城県北部で採集したクモ ................................................................……................ 226 鈴木佑弥・芹田凌平：沖縄島で採集したクモ ............................................................................. 230 鈴木佑弥・芹田凌平：西表島で採集したクモ ............................................................................. 237 鈴木佑弥・松島良介・向峯遼・渡辺黎也：北海道で採集したクモ ................................................. 245 芹田凌平：奄美大島で採集したクモ ......................................................................................... 258 芹田凌平：加計呂麻島で採集したクモ ...................................................................................... 263 芹田凌平：高知県で採集したクモ III ........................................................................................ 266 KISHIDAIA, No.118, Feb. 2021 関西で確認された野外におけるクモ類の捕食例 池 田 健 一 クモ類は陸上生態系および土壌生態系で捕食者としての役割が知られている．しかし，被 食者の具体的な分類群が明らかなクモ類の捕食例についてまとまったものは湯淺 (1939 ) がある程度で，池田 (2020 採集更新) でも一部の種に限られており，普通種であっても記 録は少ないと思われる．そこで，筆者は関西を中心に観察してきたクモ類の撮影記録のうち， 具体的な分類群が明らかである捕食例についてここに報告する．クモ目の学名および配列は 谷川 (2020 ) に従った．「データ」の項では撮影地点，続けて括弧内に確認個体数を示した． 撮影はすべて著者による．「備考」では同定の根拠となった点や著者が確認した地点の様子 や，全てではないと思われるが，確認できた文献上の捕食例などを記した． 1. マダラヒメグモ♀ Steatoda triangulosa (Walckenaer 1802) によるクロゴキブリ Periplaneta fuliginosa Serville 1839 幼虫の捕食 【データ】奈良県奈良市三碓１丁目 (1♀, 2015.05.28 ) 【備考】住宅内の窓の額縁の突出部分の下の隙間に営巣し，撮影されなかったが，巣の下に クロゴキブリ幼虫の死骸が多数あり，卵嚢も見られた．撮影個体では主要な餌となっていた と考えられる．外来種で，奈良県奈良市では荒川 (2011 ) に本種の分布記録が既にある．文 図 1．マダラヒメグモ．左：卵のう，右：♀と卵のう 1 献では日本では未同定のダンゴムシ類，昆虫類の例があり (千田 2016 )，アメリカではア リなどの昆虫，ドクイトグモを含むクモ，タカサゴキララマダニ属の一種 Amblyomma americanum ，オカダンゴムシ科の例 (Guarisco 1991 )，Ummidia 属の一種の例 (Horner & Russell 1986 )，ヒアリの例 (MacKay & Vinson 1989 ) がある． 2. ジョロウグモ♀ Trichonephila clavata (L. Koch 1878) によるコアオハナムグリ Gametis jucunda (Faldermann 1835) の捕食 【データ】奈良県奈良市中町 (1♀1♂, 2014.09.26 ) 【備考】落葉広葉樹林の林縁に雌雄ペアで見 られた．文献では同翅亜目，ハエ目，ハチ目， コウチュウ目，クモ目の捕食比率を示した例 があり(Miyashita & Shinkai 1995 )，トン ボ目の捕食例もある ( 東 京 蜘 蛛 談 話 会 2017 )．被食者の種名が示されているものと しては，ウスタビガの例 (城本・桜谷 2004 )， チャバネアオカメムシの例 (野口 2020 ) が ある． 図２．ジョロウグモ♂♀ 3. クロガケジグモ♀ Badumna insignis (L.Koch 1872) によるヨツスジトラカミキリ Leptura ochraceofasciata ochraceofasciata (Motschulsky 1861) の捕食 【データ】兵庫県神戸市西区 (1♀, 2010.07.20 ) 【備考】住宅の灯火下のインターホンに営巣していた個体で，ヨツスジトラカミキリの死骸 を確認された．死骸の脚などはばらばらになっ ていた．その他にも灯火に集まる昆虫を捕食し ていたと思われる．外来種で，兵庫県では姫路 市，加西市，豊岡市で本種の分布記録がある (山本 1992 )．日本ではショウジョウバエ，大 きいハエ，ゴキブリの例があり (後藤 1978 ) ， オーストラリアではハエ目，柔らかいコウチュ ウ目，蛾類などの多様な昆虫を捕食する 図 3．クロガケジグモ♀ (Hawkeswood 2003 )． 2 4. ワ カ バ グ モ ♀ Oxytate striatipes (L. Koch 1878) によるセリシマキモンハバチ Pachyprotasis serii Okutani 1961 の捕食 (ヤマモモ葉下面) 【データ】奈良県奈良市中町近畿大学奈良キャンパス (1♀, 2013.04.08 ) 【備考】セリシマキモンハバチの同定は Okutani (1961 ) を参照した．キャンパスの 植栽のヤマモモで見られた．東京蜘蛛談話会 (2017 ) ではサクラの蜜腺に集まるオオクロ バエやトビイロケアリ等をさかんに捕食する とあり，他にクワハムシの例 (湯淺 1939 )， ハナアブ科の例 (小野 1996 )，オオシロカネ グモの例 (高津 2004 )，ヤマトシジミの例 (宇式 2017) がある． 図 4．ワカバグモ♀ 5. カニグモ属の一種♀ Xysticus sp. によるヒゲナガハナノミ♂ Paralichas pectinatus (Kiesenwetter 1874) の捕食 (クサイチゴ葉上面) 【データ】奈良県奈良市中町近畿大学奈良キャ ンパス (1♀, 2014.05.20 ) 【備考】ヤミイロカニグモ X. croceus Fox 1937 かチュウカカニグモ X. ephippiatus Simon 1880 か ア ズ マ カ ニ グ モ X. insulicola Bös. & Str. 1906 と考えられる． 日中湧水を水源とする小規模な棚田から発生 したヒゲナガハナノミを抱えていた．ヤミイロ カニグモでは様々な昆虫，アズマカニグモでは 図 5．カニグモ属の一種♀ ヨツボシケシキスイの例がある ( 湯 淺 1939 )． 6. アサヒエビグモ♂ Philodromus subaureolus Bös. & Str. 1906 によるカゲロウ目の 一種 Ephemeroptera gen. sp. の捕食 【データ】京都府舞鶴市字余部下 (1♂, 2014.07.08 ) 【備考】壁面で夜間灯火に飛来していたカゲロウ目の一種を抱えていた．文献ではチャノミ ドリヒメヨコバイの例がある (Kosugi 2001 )． 3 7. ヤサアリグモ♀ Myrmarachne inermichelis Bös. & Str. 1906 によるユスリカ属の一 種♂ Chironomus sp. の捕食 【データ】大阪府堺市東区白鷺町 1 丁 (1♀, 2017.04.07 ) 【備考】ヤサアリグモでは光沢があり胸部の盛り上がっていることから本種とした．ユスリ カ属は交尾器により同定される (日本ユスリカ研究会 2010 )．マンションの壁面で見られ た個体で，夜間の灯火に飛来したと思われるユスリカ属を日中抱えている様子が確認された． 文献では微小な昆虫，特に葉裏に潜む蚊等を捕食するとされる (小松 1936 )． 8. デーニッツハエトリ幼体 Plexippoides doenitzi (Karsch 1879) によるクロバネキノコ バエ科 Sciaridae Gen. sp. の捕食 (ソメイヨシノ幹上) 【データ】奈良県奈良市中町近畿大学奈良キャ ンパス (1 幼体, 2013.09.21 ) 【備考】伊藤 (1977 ) のクロバネキノコバエ科 と翅脈が一致したところから本科とした．植栽 のソメイヨシノで見られた．文献ではコシロカ ネグモの例 (高野ら 1976 )，オウギグモの例 (平松 1991 )，キハダカニグモ♀亜成体の例 (池田 2005 )，ムネグロサラグモの例 (鈴木 図 6．デ-ニッツハエトリ幼体 2019 )，ニホンヒメグモの例 (芹田 2020 ) が ある． 9. カラスハエトリ♀ Rhene atrata (Karsch 1881) によるモリチャバネゴキブリ Blattella nipponica Asahina, 1963 幼虫の捕食 (ヤブ ツバキ葉上面) 【データ】奈良県奈良市中町近畿大学奈良キャ ンパス (1♀, 2015.07.02 ) 【備考】キャンパス内の植栽のヤブツバキで見 図 7．カラスハエトリ♀ られた． 引用文献 荒川 真 2011 ．奈良県産のムロズミソレグモとマダラヒメグモ．くものいと , 45: 14–17. 4 後藤岳志 1978 ．クロガケジグモの生活．Atypus, 71: 40–43. Guarisco, H. 1991. Predation of two common house spiders upon medically significant pests. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 94, 79–81. Hawkeswood, T. J. 2003. Spiders of Australia: an introduction to their classification, biology and distribution. 264 pp. Pensoft, Sofia. 平松毅久 1991 ．デーニッツハエトリに捕食されたオウギグモ．Kishidaia, 62: 21. Horner, N. V., & Russell, D. 1986. Ummidia trapdoor spider caught in a Steatoda web (Araneae: Ctenzidae, Theridiidae). Journal of Arachnology, 14: 142. 池田博明 2005 ．2014 年度観察採集会報告 藤沢市新林公園のクモ．Kishidaia, 107: 47–60. 池田博明 2020 年 3 月 15 日最終更新．クモ生理生態事典 2019 (編集中)．http://spider.art.coocan. jp/studycenter/Dic11.html ． 伊藤修四郎
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Records from Colin-Cornwall Lakes Wildland Provincial Park
    SPIDER RECORDS FROM COLIN-CORNWALL LAKES WILDLAND PROVINCIAL PARK Larinioides cornutus Thanatus coloradensis (Photo by D. Buckle) (Photo by D. Buckle) Prepared by Wayne Nordstrom1 and Don Buckle2 March 2004 1Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre Parks and Protected Areas Division Alberta Community Development 2 620 Albert Avenue Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G7 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 2. The Study Site.............................................................................................................................. 1 3. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Survey Dates....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Collection of Spiders .......................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Identification of Spiders ..................................................................................................... 4 4. Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................ 4 5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................11 6. Acknowlegements........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Does Argentine Ant Invasion Conserve Colouring Variation of Myrmecomorphic Jumping Spider?
    Open Journal of Animal Sciences, 2014, 4, 144-151 Published Online June 2014 in SciRes. http://www.scirp.org/journal/ojas http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ojas.2014.43019 Argentine Ant Affects Ant-Mimetic Arthropods: Does Argentine Ant Invasion Conserve Colouring Variation of Myrmecomorphic Jumping Spider? Yoshifumi Touyama1, Fuminori Ito2 1Niho, Minami-ku, Hiroshima City, Japan 2Laboratory of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Kagawa University, Ikenobe, Japan Email: [email protected] Received 23 April 2014; revised 3 June 2014; accepted 22 June 2014 Copyright © 2014 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY). http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Abstract Argentine ant invasion changed colour-polymorphic composition of ant-mimetic jumping spider Myrmarachne in southwestern Japan. In Argentine ant-free sites, most of Myrmarachne exhibited all-blackish colouration. In Argentine ant-infested sites, on the other hand, blackish morph de- creased, and bicoloured (i.e. partly bright-coloured) morphs increased in dominance. Invasive Argentine ant drives away native blackish ants. Disappearance of blackish model ants supposedly led to malfunction of Batesian mimicry of Myrmarachne. Keywords Batesian Mimicry, Biological Invasion, Linepithema humile, Myrmecomorphy, Myrmarachne, Polymorphism 1. Introduction It has attracted attention of biologists that many arthropods morphologically and/or behaviorally resemble ants [1]-[4]. Resemblance of non-ant arthropods to aggressive and/or unpalatable ants is called myrmecomorphy (ant-mimicry). Especially, spider myrmecomorphy has been described through many literatures [5]-[9]. Myr- mecomorphy is considered to be an example of Batesian mimicry gaining protection from predators.
    [Show full text]
  • An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal for Rapid Publication
    VOLUME-12 NUMBER-4 (October-December 2019) Print ISSN: 0974-6455 Online ISSN: 2321-4007 CODEN: BBRCBA www.bbrc.in University Grants Commission (UGC) New Delhi, India Approved Journal An International Peer Reviewed Open Access Journal For Rapid Publication Published By: Society for Science & Nature (SSN) Bhopal India Indexed by Thomson Reuters, Now Clarivate Analytics USA ISI ESCI SJIF=4.186 Online Content Available: Every 3 Months at www.bbrc.in Registered with the Registrar of Newspapers for India under Reg. No. 498/2007 Bioscience Biotechnology Research Communications VOLUME-12 NUMBER-4 (Oct-Dec 2019) Characteristics of Peptone from the Mackerel, Scomber japonicus Head by-Product as Bacterial Growth Media 829-836 Dwi Setijawati, Abdul A. Jaziri, Hefti S. Yufidasari, Dian W. Wardani, Mohammad D. Pratomo, Dinda Ersyah and Nurul Huda Endomycorrhizae Enhances Reciprocal Resource Exchange Via Membrane Protein Induction 837-843 Faten Dhawi Does Prediabetic State Affects Dental Implant Health? A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 844-854 Khulud Abdulrahman Al-Aali An Updated Review on the Spiders of Order Araneae from the Districts of Western Ghats of India 855-864 Misal P. K, Bendre N. N, Pawar P. A, Bhoite S. H and Deshpande V. Y Synergetic Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Promoting Plant Growth and Exhibiting Antimicrobial 865-875 Mbarek Rahmoun and Bouri Amira Synergetic Role of Endophytic Bacteria in Promoting Plant Growth and Exhibiting 876-882 Antimicrobial Activities Bassam Oudh Al Johny Influence on Diabetic Pregnant Women with a Family History of Type 2 Diabetes 883-888 Sameera A. Al-Ghamdi Remediation of Cadmium Through Hyperaccumulator Plant, Solanum nigrum 889-893 Ihsan Ullah Biorefinery Sequential Extraction of Alginate by Conventional and Hydrothermal Fucoidan from the 894-903 Brown Alga, Sargassum cristaefolium Sugiono Sugiono and Doni Ferdiansyah Occupational Stress and Job Satisfaction in Prosthodontists working in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia 904-911 Nawaf Labban, Sulieman S.
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Biodiversity Patterns and Their Conservation in the Azorean
    Systematics and Biodiversity 6 (2): 249–282 Issued 6 June 2008 doi:10.1017/S1477200008002648 Printed in the United Kingdom C The Natural History Museum ∗ Paulo A.V. Borges1 & Joerg Wunderlich2 Spider biodiversity patterns and their 1Azorean Biodiversity Group, Departamento de Ciˆencias conservation in the Azorean archipelago, Agr´arias, CITA-A, Universidade dos Ac¸ores. Campus de Angra, with descriptions of new species Terra-Ch˜a; Angra do Hero´ısmo – 9700-851 – Terceira (Ac¸ores); Portugal. Email: [email protected] 2Oberer H¨auselbergweg 24, Abstract In this contribution, we report on patterns of spider species diversity of 69493 Hirschberg, Germany. the Azores, based on recently standardised sampling protocols in different hab- Email: joergwunderlich@ t-online.de itats of this geologically young and isolated volcanic archipelago. A total of 122 species is investigated, including eight new species, eight new records for the submitted December 2005 Azorean islands and 61 previously known species, with 131 new records for indi- accepted November 2006 vidual islands. Biodiversity patterns are investigated, namely patterns of range size distribution for endemics and non-endemics, habitat distribution patterns, island similarity in species composition and the estimation of species richness for the Azores. Newly described species are: Oonopidae – Orchestina furcillata Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Linyphiinae – Porrhomma borgesi Wunderlich; Turinyphia cavernicola Wunderlich; Linyphiidae: Micronetinae – Agyneta depigmentata Wunderlich; Linyph- iidae:
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of Polish Spiders (Araneae, Except Salticidae) File:///D:/Internet/Polen/Polen Spinnenliste 2004.Htm
    Check-list of Polish spiders (Araneae, except Salticidae) file:///D:/Internet/Polen/Polen Spinnenliste 2004.htm Check-list of Polish spiders (Araneae, except Salticidae) 1. November, 2004 by Wojciech STARĘGA Instytut Biologii, Katedra Zoologii, Akademia Podlaska, Siedlce [email protected] The present list is a compilation and continuation of the earlier check-lists of Polish spiders (PRÓSZYŃSKI & STARĘGA 1971, 1997, 2003, STARĘGA 1983, PROSZYNSKI & STAREGA 2002]. It will be currently updated, according to the progress of cognition of the country's spider fauna. I give also a list of the most important faunistic and other publications after 1971 which add any species new to the Polish fauna (or cross out some of them). The nomenclatural changes were regarded as far as possible to unify the names used in Polish arachnological literature with those in foreign check-lists and catalogues (e.g. PLATEN & al. 1995, commented by BLICK 1998), NENTWIG et. at. 2003, TANASEVITCH 2004, and first of all, with the latest version (5.0) of the "Spider Catalog" by PLATNICK (2004). The species, which occurrence in Poland is certain, have serial numbers, some exceptions which need confirmation or re-examination are marked with "X" sign instead of a number; doubtful species were not listed, though named in earlier papers (pre-1971). Species described from Poland (or with Polish localities mentioned in their original descriptions) are marked with „☼” sign. Species not "officially" known (i.e. published) from Poland but whose occurrence is already confirmed have remark „(fide ... [the name of its finder])". Some nomenclatorical remarks are given in square brackets. The species protected by law are marked with an asterisk (*), threatened ones - with symbols (in italics) used in the newest "Red list of threatened species in Poland" (STARĘGA & al.
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of Native and Non-Native Grasses on Spiders, Their Prey, and Their Interactions
    Spiders in California’s grassland mosaic: The effects of native and non-native grasses on spiders, their prey, and their interactions by Kirsten Elise Hill A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science, Policy, and Management in the GRADUATE DIVISION of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor Joe R. McBride, Chair Professor Rosemary G. Gillespie Professor Mary E. Power Spring 2014 © 2014 Abstract Spiders in California’s grassland mosaic: The effects of native and non-native grasses on spiders, their prey, and their interactions by Kirsten Elise Hill Doctor of Philosophy in Environmental Science and Policy Management University of California, Berkeley Professor Joe R. McBride, Chair Found in nearly all terrestrial ecosystems, small in size and able to occupy a variety of hunting niches, spiders’ consumptive effects on other arthropods can have important impacts for ecosystems. This dissertation describes research into spider populations and their interactions with potential arthropod prey in California’s native and non-native grasslands. In meadows found in northern California, native and non-native grassland patches support different functional groups of arthropod predators, sap-feeders, pollinators, and scavengers and arthropod diversity is linked to native plant diversity. Wandering spiders’ ability to forage within the meadow’s interior is linked to the distance from the shaded woodland boundary. Native grasses offer a cooler conduit into the meadow interior than non-native annual grasses during midsummer heat. Juvenile spiders in particular, are more abundant in the more structurally complex native dominated areas of the grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
    [Show full text]
  • Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)
    INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY OF ANIMALS, SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) by D.V. Logunov & Yu.M. Marusik KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000 D. V. Logunov & Y. M. Marusik. Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000. 299 pp. In English. Ä. Â. Ëîãóíîâ & Þ. Ì. Ìàðóñèê. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Ìîñêâà: èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. 2000. 299 ñòð. Íà àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå. This is the first complete catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia. It is based on both original data and published data dating from 1861 to October 2000. Northern Asia is defined as the territories of Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, northern provinces of China, and both Korea and Japan (Hokkaido only). The catalogue lists 216 valid species belonging to 41 genera. The following data are supplied for each species: a range character- istic, all available records from northern Asia with approximate coordinates (mapped), all misidentifications and doubtful records (not mapped), habitat preferences, references to available biological data, taxonomic notes on species where necessary, references to lists of regional fauna and to catalogues of general importance. 24 species are excluded from the list of the Northern Asian salticids. 5 species names are newly synonymized: Evarcha pseudolaetabunda Peng & Xie, 1994 with E. mongolica Danilov & Logunov, 1994; He- liophanus mongolicus Schenkel, 1953 with H. baicalensis Kulczyñski, 1895; Neon rostra- tus Seo, 1995 with N. minutus ¯abka, 1985; Salticus potanini Schenkel, 1963 with S.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnologische Arachnology
    Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha
    [Show full text]