DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY OF ANIMALS, SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) by D.V. Logunov & Yu.M. Marusik KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000 D. V. Logunov & Y. M. Marusik. Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000. 299 pp. In English. Ä. Â. Ëîãóíîâ & Þ. Ì. Ìàðóñèê. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Ìîñêâà: èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. 2000. 299 ñòð. Íà àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå. This is the first complete catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia. It is based on both original data and published data dating from 1861 to October 2000. Northern Asia is defined as the territories of Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, northern provinces of China, and both Korea and Japan (Hokkaido only). The catalogue lists 216 valid species belonging to 41 genera. The following data are supplied for each species: a range character- istic, all available records from northern Asia with approximate coordinates (mapped), all misidentifications and doubtful records (not mapped), habitat preferences, references to available biological data, taxonomic notes on species where necessary, references to lists of regional fauna and to catalogues of general importance. 24 species are excluded from the list of the Northern Asian salticids. 5 species names are newly synonymized: Evarcha pseudolaetabunda Peng & Xie, 1994 with E. mongolica Danilov & Logunov, 1994; He- liophanus mongolicus Schenkel, 1953 with H. baicalensis Kulczyñski, 1895; Neon rostra- tus Seo, 1995 with N. minutus ¯abka, 1985; Salticus potanini Schenkel, 1963 with S. lati- dentatus Roewer, 1951; and Synageles lepidus Kulczyñski in Chyzer & Kulczyñski, 1897 with S. subcingulatus (Simon, 1878). One Evarcha species is transferred to Pancorius: Pancorius crassipes (Karsch, 1881) comb. nov. 5 species names, Attus quadrifasciatus Grube, 1861, Salticus japonicus Karsch, 1879, Phidippus procus Karsch, 1879, Pseudohe- liophanus similis Schenkel, 1963 and Attus basalis Karsch, 1878, are recognized to be nomina nuda. 2 species names, Attus dimidiatus Grube, 1861 and Attus fuscostriatus Grube, 1861, are reported as nomina oblita. This catalogue is intended for zoologists, mainly arachnologists, as well as for biogeogra- phers, local biologists and naturalists. Ïåðâûé ïîëíûé êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè âêëþ÷àåò 216 âèäîâ èç 41 ðîäà. Äëÿ êàæäîãî âèäà óêàçàíû: ïîëíàÿ õàðàêòåðèñòèêà àðåàëà, âñå èìåþùèåñÿ óêàçàíèÿ ñ òåððèòîðèè Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè ñ ïðèìåðíûìè êîîðäèíàòàìè (âñå òî÷êè êàð- òèðîâàíû), âñå îøèáî÷íûå è ñîìíèòåëüíûå óêàçàíèÿ, ññûëêè íà èìåþùèåñÿ äàííûå ïî ìåñòîîáèòàíèÿì è áèîëîãèè, òàêñîíîìè÷åñêèå çàìåòêè (åñëè íåîáõîäèìû), ññûë- êè íà ñïèñêè ðåãèîíàëüíûõ ôàóí è îáùèå êàòàëîãè. 24 âèäà èñêëþ÷åíû èç ñïèñêà ñàëüòèöèä Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè. 5 âèäîâûõ íàçâàíèé âïåðâûå ñèíîíèìèçèðîâàíû. Îäèí âèä Evarcha ïåðåìåùåí â ðîä Pancorius. 5 âèäîâûõ íàçâàíèé óêàçàíû êàê nomina nuda. 2 âèäîâûõ íàçâàíèÿ óêàçàíû êàê nomina oblita. Êàòàëîã ïðåäíàçíà÷åí äëÿ çîîëîãîâ, ãëàâíûì îáðàçîì àðàõíîëîãîâ, à òàêæå äëÿ áèîãåîãðàôîâ, êðàåâåäîâ è íàòóðàëèñòîâ. © òåêñò, êàðòû, Ä.Â. Ëîãóíîâ, Þ.Ì. Ìàðóñèê ISBN 5-87317-081-9 © èçäàíèå, èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. CONTENT 3 Content Checklist of genera ....................................................................................... 4 Foreword....................................................................................................... 6 Preface .......................................................................................................... 7 Acknowledgements ................................................................................... 7 Introduction .................................................................................................. 8 Brief historical remarks ............................................................................. 8 Methodology............................................................................................ 10 Geographical distribution ........................................................................ 17 Catalogue of the genera and species ........................................................... 28 Annotated checklist ................................................................................. 28 Nomina dubia ........................................................................................ 258 Nomina oblita ........................................................................................ 259 Erroneous and/or doubtful records ........................................................ 259 References ................................................................................................ 266 Index to species ........................................................................................ 293 4 D. LOGUNOV & YU. MARUSIK. CATALOGUE OF THE JUMPING SPIDERS OF NORTHERN ASIA (SALTICIDAE) Checklist of genera 1. Aelurillus ................................................................................................ 28 2. Asianellus ............................................................................................... 33 3. Ballus ...................................................................................................... 40 4. Bianor ................................................................................................. 41 5. Bristowia................................................................................................. 46 6. Carrhotus ................................................................................................ 47 7. Chalcoscirtus .......................................................................................... 49 8. Dendryphantes........................................................................................ 59 9. Euophrys ................................................................................................. 71 10. Evarcha................................................................................................. 78 11. Harmochirus ..................................................................................... 96 12. Helicius ................................................................................................. 98 13. Heliophanus.......................................................................................... 99 14. Laufeia ................................................................................................ 123 15. Marpissa ............................................................................................. 123 16. Mendoza ............................................................................................. 131 17. Menemerus ......................................................................................... 139 18. Mogrus................................................................................................ 140 19. Myrmarachne ..................................................................................... 141 20. Neon.................................................................................................... 146 21. Pancorius............................................................................................ 150 22. Pellenes............................................................................................... 151 23. Philaeus .............................................................................................. 162 24. Phintella ............................................................................................. 164 25. Phlegra ............................................................................................... 175 26. Plexippoides ....................................................................................... 179 27. Plexippus ............................................................................................ 182 28. Pseudeuophrys.................................................................................... 183 29. Pseudicius ........................................................................................... 189 30. Rhene .................................................................................................. 194 31. Salticus ............................................................................................... 195 32. Siler..................................................................................................... 200 33. Sitticus ................................................................................................ 201 34. Synageles ............................................................................................ 226 35. Synagelides ......................................................................................... 232 CHECKLIST OF GENERA 5 36. Talavera .............................................................................................. 234 37. Tasa..................................................................................................... 242 38. Telamonia ........................................................................................... 242 39. Tuvaphantes ........................................................................................ 243 40. Yaginumaella ...................................................................................... 244 41. Yllenus ...............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Molecular Phylogeny, Divergence Times and Biogeography of Spiders of the Subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang A, , Wayne P
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 68 (2013) 81–92 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Molec ular Phylo genetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Molecular phylogeny, divergence times and biogeography of spiders of the subfamily Euophryinae (Araneae: Salticidae) ⇑ Jun-Xia Zhang a, , Wayne P. Maddison a,b a Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 b Department of Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 article info abstract Article history: We investigate phylogenetic relationships of the jumping spider subfamily Euophryinae, diverse in spe- Received 10 August 2012 cies and genera in both the Old World and New World. DNA sequence data of four gene regions (nuclear: Revised 17 February 2013 28S, Actin 5C; mitochondrial: 16S-ND1, COI) were collected from 263 jumping spider species. The molec- Accepted 13 March 2013 ular phylogeny obtained by Bayesian, likelihood and parsimony methods strongly supports the mono- Available online 28 March 2013 phyly of a Euophryinae re-delimited to include 85 genera. Diolenius and its relatives are shown to be euophryines. Euophryines from different continental regions generally form separate clades on the phy- Keywords: logeny, with few cases of mixture. Known fossils of jumping spiders were used to calibrate a divergence Phylogeny time analysis, which suggests most divergences of euophryines were after the Eocene. Given the diver- Temporal divergence Biogeography gence times, several intercontinental dispersal event sare required to explain the distribution of euophry- Intercontinental dispersal ines. Early transitions of continental distribution between the Old and New World may have been Euophryinae facilitated by the Antarctic land bridge, which euophryines may have been uniquely able to exploit Diolenius because of their apparent cold tolerance.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Simonid Spiders (Araneae: Salticidae: Salticinae) in India
    IJBI 2 (2), (DECEMBER 2020) 247-276 International Journal of Biological Innovations Available online: http://ijbi.org.in | http://www.gesa.org.in/journals.php DOI: https://doi.org/10.46505/IJBI.2020.2223 Review Article E-ISSN: 2582-1032 DIVERSITY OF SIMONID SPIDERS (ARANEAE: SALTICIDAE: SALTICINAE) IN INDIA Rajendra Singh1*, Garima Singh2, Bindra Bihari Singh3 1Department of Zoology, Deendayal Upadhyay University of Gorakhpur (U.P.), India 2Department of Zoology, University of Rajasthan, Jaipur (Rajasthan), India 3Department of Agricultural Entomology, Janta Mahavidyalaya, Ajitmal, Auraiya (U.P.), India *Corresponding author: [email protected] Received: 01.09.2020 Accepted: 30.09.2020 Published: 09.10.2020 Abstract: Distribution of spiders belonging to 4 tribes of clade Simonida (Salticinae: Salticidae: Araneae) reported in India is dealt. The tribe Aelurillini (7 genera, 27 species) is represented in 16 states and in 2 union territories, Euophryini (10 genera, 16 species) in 14 states and in 4 union territories, Leptorchestini (2 genera, 3 species) only in 2 union territories, Plexippini (22 genera, 73 species) in all states except Mizoram and in 3 union territories, and Salticini (3 genera, 11 species) in 15 states and in 4 union terrioties. West Bengal harbours maximum number of species, followed by Tamil Nadu and Maharashtra. Out of 129 species of the spiders listed, 70 species (54.3%) are endemic to India. Keywords: Aelurillini, Euophryini, India, Leptorchestini, Plexippini, Salticidae, Simonida. INTRODUCTION Hisponinae, Lyssomaninae, Onomastinae, Spiders are chelicerate arthropods belonging to Salticinae and Spartaeinae. Out of all the order Araneae of class Arachnida. Till to date subfamilies, Salticinae comprises 93.7% of the 48,804 described species under 4,180 genera and species (5818 species, 576 genera, including few 128 families (WSC, 2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Spider Records from Colin-Cornwall Lakes Wildland Provincial Park
    SPIDER RECORDS FROM COLIN-CORNWALL LAKES WILDLAND PROVINCIAL PARK Larinioides cornutus Thanatus coloradensis (Photo by D. Buckle) (Photo by D. Buckle) Prepared by Wayne Nordstrom1 and Don Buckle2 March 2004 1Alberta Natural Heritage Information Centre Parks and Protected Areas Division Alberta Community Development 2 620 Albert Avenue Saskatoon, SK S7N 1G7 Table of Contents 1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 1 2. The Study Site.............................................................................................................................. 1 3. Methods ....................................................................................................................................... 3 3.1 Survey Dates....................................................................................................................... 3 3.2 Collection of Spiders .......................................................................................................... 3 3.3 Identification of Spiders ..................................................................................................... 4 4. Results and Discussion ................................................................................................................ 4 5. Conclusion ...................................................................................................................................11 6. Acknowlegements........................................................................................................................11
    [Show full text]
  • Middle European Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 (Araneae: Salticidae)—One, Two Or Three Genera?
    1998. P. A. Selden (ed.). Proceedings of the 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh 1997. Middle European Euophrys C. L. Koch, 1834 (Araneae: Salticidae)—one, two or three genera? Marek Z˙abka1 and Jerzy Prószyn´ski2 1 Zak´lad Zoologii WSRP 08–110 Siedlce, Poland 2Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii PAN, ul. Wilcza 64, 00–950 Warszawa, Poland Summary The genus Euophrys from Britain and Central Europe (excluding the Mediterranean) is redefined. Of seventeen species analysed, only E. frontalis (Walckenaer, 1802) and E. herbigrada (Simon, 1871) are proposed to represent Euophrys (sensu stricto). Genus Pseudeuophrys is reinstated to include four European species. Six species are listed in Talavera. The relationships between the three genera and their distribution are discussed. The status of three species has still to be clarified. Introduction subject of informal discussion for years, but in the majority of papers Euophrys is still the only Euophrys is one of the largest and yet one of genus considered. the most poorly known genera in the Salticidae. Logunov (1992) was the first to review the Prószyn´ski (1990) and Platnick (1993) listed position of some Palaearctic species. He sug- over 130 nominal species from Europe, Asia, gested limiting the genus Euophrys to the Africa, the Americas, and the Pacific islands. frontalis species group and excluding In its present sense, however, the genus is a E. erratica, E. lanigera and E. obsoleta. mixture of many groups of unrelated species, Logunov also transferred E. aequipes (O. P.- frequently included on the basis of small size Cambridge, 1871), E. monticola Kulczyn´ski, and some convergent similarities in genitalic 1884 and E.
    [Show full text]
  • Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: on the Occasion of His 60Th Birthday
    Zootaxa 5006 (1): 006–012 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Biography ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5006.1.4 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:B883A8B0-F324-400F-B670-304511C53963 Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov: On the occasion of his 60th Birthday YURI M. MARUSIK1 & VICTOR FET2 1Institute for Biological Problems of the North, Portovaya Street 18, Magadan 685000, Russia Department of Zoology & Entomology, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein 9300, South Africa [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4499-5148 2Department of Biological Sciences, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia 25755-2510, USA [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1016-600X Kirill Glebovich Mikhailov was born on 29 July 1961 in Moscow, Russia. Both of his parents, Gleb K. Mikhailov (1929–2021) and Galina R. Mikhailova (1926–2019), were research scientists. Kirill’s father was an expert in the history of mechanics, and mother, a biologist. Since early childhood Kirill was raised mainly by his maternal grandparents, Ro- man P. Nosov and Antonina V. Nosova. Kirill’s grandfather, a CPSU official and a career administrator at the Ministry of Energetics, retired from his post in 1965 to take care of the grandson. Kirill’s grandmother, an obstetrician by profession, received disability at a military plant during the WWII in evacuation, and was a housewife after the war. In 1978, Kirill began his studies at the Division of Biology (Biologicheskii Fakul’tet) of the Moscow State University (below, MSU). Even earlier, as a schoolboy, Kirill used to buy books on zoology, especially separate issues of the Fauna of the USSR and Keys to the Fauna of the USSR, then relatively cheap and available.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution of Spiders in Coastal Grey Dunes
    kaft_def 7/8/04 11:22 AM Pagina 1 SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY D ISTRIBUTION OF SPIDERS IN COASTAL GREY DUNES Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes SPATIAL PATTERNS AND EVOLUTIONARY- ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL - ECOLOGICAL IMPORTANCE OF DISPERSAL Dries Bonte Dispersal is crucial in structuring species distribution, population structure and species ranges at large geographical scales or within local patchily distributed populations. The knowledge of dispersal evolution, motivation, its effect on metapopulation dynamics and species distribution at multiple scales is poorly understood and many questions remain unsolved or require empirical verification. In this thesis we contribute to the knowledge of dispersal, by studying both ecological and evolutionary aspects of spider dispersal in fragmented grey dunes. Studies were performed at the individual, population and assemblage level and indicate that behavioural traits narrowly linked to dispersal, con- siderably show [adaptive] variation in function of habitat quality and geometry. Dispersal also determines spider distribution patterns and metapopulation dynamics. Consequently, our results stress the need to integrate knowledge on behavioural ecology within the study of ecological landscapes. / Promotor: Prof. Dr. Eckhart Kuijken [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Dries Bonte Conservation] Co-promotor: Prf. Dr. Jean-Pierre Maelfait [Ghent University & Institute of Nature Conservation] and Prof. Dr. Luc lens [Ghent University] Date of public defence: 6 February 2004 [Ghent University] Universiteit Gent Faculteit Wetenschappen Academiejaar 2003-2004 Distribution of spiders in coastal grey dunes: spatial patterns and evolutionary-ecological importance of dispersal Verspreiding van spinnen in grijze kustduinen: ruimtelijke patronen en evolutionair-ecologisch belang van dispersie door Dries Bonte Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor [Ph.D.] in Sciences Proefschrift voorgedragen tot het bekomen van de graad van Doctor in de Wetenschappen Promotor: Prof.
    [Show full text]
  • In Flora of Altai
    Ukrainian Journal of Ecology Ukrainian Journal of Ecology, 2018, 8(4), 362-369 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Genus Campanula L. (Campanulaceae Juss.) in flora of Altai A.I. Shmakov1, A.A. Kechaykin1, T.A. Sinitsyna1, D.N. Shaulo2, S.V. Smirnov1 1South-Siberian Botanical Garden, Altai State University, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia, E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 2Central Siberian Botanical Garden, Zolotodolinskaya st., 101, Novosibirsk, 630090, Russia. Received: 29.10.2018. Accepted: 03.12.2018 A taxonomic study of the genus Campanula L. in the flora of Altai is presented. Based on the data obtained, 14 Campanula species, belonging to 3 subgenera and 7 sections, grow in the territory of the Altai Mountain Country. The subgenus Campanula includes 4 sections and 8 species and is the most diverse in the flora of Altai. An original key is presented to determine the Campanula species in Altai. For each species, nomenclature, ecological and geographical data, as well as information about type material, are provided. New locations of Campanula species are indicated for separate botanical and geographical regions of Altai. Keywords: Altai; Campanula; distribution; diversity; ecology; species A taxonomic study of the genus Campanula L. in the flora of Altai is presented. Based on the data obtained, 14 Campanula species, belonging to 3 subgenera and 7 sections, grow in the territory of the Altai Mountain Country. The subgenus Campanula includes 4 sections and 8 species and is the most diverse in the flora of Altai. An original key is presented to determine the Campanula species in Altai. For each species, nomenclature, ecological and geographical data, as well as information about type material, are provided.
    [Show full text]
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists
    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
    [Show full text]
  • SA Spider Checklist
    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • Myrmarachnine Jumping Spiders of the New Subtribe Levieina from Papua
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 842: 85–112 (2019) New myrmarachnine jumping spiders 85 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.842.32970 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Myrmarachnine jumping spiders of the new subtribe Levieina from Papua New Guinea (Araneae, Salticidae, Myrmarachnini) Wayne P. Maddison1, Tamás Szűts2 1 Departments of Zoology and Botany and Beaty Biodiversity Museum, University of British Columbia, 6270 University Boulevard, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6T 1Z4, Canada 2 Department of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Budapest, H1077, Rottenbiller u. 50, Hungary Corresponding author: Wayne P. Maddison (wayne.maddison@ ubc.ca) Academic editor: Jeremy Miller | Received 10 January 2019 | Accepted 12 March 2019 | Published 7 May 2019 http://zoobank.org/D911C055-FF4B-4900-877B-123951761AC1 Citation: Maddison WP, Szűts T (2019) Myrmarachnine jumping spiders of the new subtribe Levieina from Papua New Guinea (Araneae, Salticidae, Myrmarachnini). ZooKeys 842: 85–112. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.842.32970 Abstract A previously unreported radiation of myrmarachnine jumping spiders from New Guinea is described, which, although having few known species, is remarkably diverse in body forms. This clade is the new subtribe Levieina, represented by seven new species in three new genera. Within Leviea gen. n. are three new species, L. herberti sp. n., L. lornae sp. n., and L. francesae sp. n., all of which are unusual among the myrmarachnines in appearing as typical salticids, not antlike. Papuamyr gen. n. superficially resembles Ligonipes Karsch, 1878 or Rhombonotus L. Koch, 1879 as a compact antlike spider, but lacks their laterally- compressed palp and bears an ectal spur on the paturon of the chelicera.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Ohio Spiders
    List of Ohio Spiders 2 August 2021 Richard A. Bradley Department of EEO Biology Ohio State University Museum of Biological Diversity 1315 Kinnear Road Columbus, OH 43212 This list is based on published specimen records of spider species from Ohio. Additional species that have been recorded during the Ohio Spider Survey (beginning 1994) are also included. I would very much appreciate any corrections; please mail them to the above address or email ([email protected]). 676 [+6] Species Mygalomorphae Antrodiaetidae (foldingdoor spiders) (2) Antrodiaetus robustus (Simon, 1890) Antrodiaetus unicolor (Hentz, 1842) Atypidae (purseweb spiders) (3) Sphodros coylei Gertsch & Platnick, 1980 Sphodros niger (Hentz, 1842) Sphodros rufipes (Latreille, 1829) Euctenizidae (waferdoor spiders) (1) Myrmekiaphila foliata Atkinson, 1886 Halonoproctidae (trapdoor spiders) (1) Ummidia audouini (Lucas, 1835) Araneomorphae Agelenidae (funnel weavers) (14) Agelenopsis emertoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1935 | Agelenopsis kastoni Chamberlin & Ivie, 1941 | Agelenopsis naevia (Walckenaer, 1805) grass spiders Agelenopsis pennsylvanica (C.L. Koch, 1843) | Agelnopsis potteri (Blackwell, 1846) | Agelenopsis utahana (Chamberlin & Ivie, 1933) | Coras aerialis Muma, 1946 Coras juvenilis (Keyserling, 1881) Coras lamellosus (Keyserling, 1887) Coras medicinalis (Hentz, 1821) Coras montanus (Emerton, 1889) Tegenaria domestica (Clerck, 1757) barn funnel weaver In Wadotes calcaratus (Keyserling, 1887) Wadotes hybridus (Emerton, 1889) Amaurobiidae (hackledmesh weavers) (2) Amaurobius
    [Show full text]
  • “There Would Doubtless Be a Just Feeling of Pride
    “There would doubtless be a just feeling of pride and satisfaction in the heart of a naturalist who could say that he had made himself thoroughly acquainted with all the species of a particular group of animals, had learned their most secret habits, and mastered their several relations to the objects, animate and inanimate, which surrounded them. But perhaps a still keener pleasure is enjoyed by one who carries about with him some problem of the kind but partially solved, and who, holding in his hand the clue which shall guide him onwards, sees in each new place that he visits fresh opportunities of discovery.” J. Traherne Moggridge Harvesting Ants and Trap-door Spiders, page 180 Saville, Edwards and Co., London 1874 University of Alberta Composition and structure of spider assemblages in layers of the mixedwood boreal forest after variable retention harvest by Jaime H. Pinzón A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Wildlife Ecology and Management Department of Renewable Resources ©Jaime H. Pinzón Fall 2011 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission.
    [Show full text]