DOCSLIB.ORG

KISHIDAIA, No.117, Aug

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

ＫＩＳＨＩＤＡＩＡ Bulletin of Tokyo Spider Study Group No.117, Aug. 2020 ─ 目 次 ─ 奥村賢一：ヤチグモ類奇形個体の事例 ……………........................…………................………...….. 1 馬場友希・河野勝行：アマミホウシグモによるコヒゲジロハサミムシの捕食 …..................…….…. 4 馬場友希・吉田 譲：福島県からのババハシリグモの初記録 .....................................................… 7 新海 明：スズミグモの網構造の再検討 ………................................…………................…..…….. 9 鈴木佑弥：野外におけるシラホシコゲチャハエトリの雄間闘争の観察 …………...............………..… 14 鈴木佑弥・奥村賢一：静岡県におけるヤクチビヤチグモの記録 ................................................... 18 鈴木佑弥・安藤昭久：イッカクコブガシラヌカグモ (新称) の分布記録 ....................................... 22 平松毅久・嶋田順一：晩秋の奥武蔵にカネコトタテグモを探して ................................................ 27 平松毅久：埼玉県でムナアカナルコグモを採集 ......................................................................... 31 長井聡道：ヤスダコモリグモの生態 ........................................................................................ 34 平松毅久：本土産ナルコグモと卵のうが微妙に違う南西諸島産 Wendilgarda （カラカラグモ科） .... 39 DRAGLINES 馬場友希・中島 淳：福岡県におけるマダラフクログモの初記録 ….......................................... 44 馬場友希・中島 淳・奥村賢一：福岡県北九州市白島 (男島) におけるクモの追加記録 .............. 45 笹岡文雄：プランターから採集されたナナメケシグモ ..…………......…….…….…...............…….. 46 嶋田順一：「はやにえ」にされたジョロウクモを見て思うこと ….............................................. 46 嶋田順一・吉野光代：天覧山でクモタケが大量発生 …………...............…………......................... 48 加藤俊英・馬場友希：ワイノジハエトリの千葉県からの採集記録 …………..…..................………. 50 林 成多・馬場友希：島根県東部のイソハエトリ ...…………….…………………................………. 51 遠藤鴻明・内田翔太・篠部将太朗・谷川明男：南大東島で採集されたクモ ................................. 53 遠藤鴻明：青ヶ島で採集されたクモ …….....................................................................…….…. 54 遠藤鴻明：八丈島で採集されたクモ ….................................................................................… 56 遠藤鴻明：奄美大島で採集されたクモ …………......................………….…..…..............………… 58 惠 海斗・鈴木佑弥：ヒゲナガアメイロケアリの巣から採集されたコタナグモ ……...............…... 61 鈴木佑弥：アオグロハシリグモによるニホンアマガエルの捕食事例 ……………….................…… 62 鈴木佑弥：ササグモの卵嚢を摂食するアシナガコマチグモ ……………………...…................…….. 63 鈴木佑弥：千葉県で採集したクモ類 ……………….................………………..……................…….. 64 鈴木佑弥・小森谷泰：北大東島で採集されたクモ ……………………………………................…….. 67 鈴木佑弥：スズミグモの網内にジョロウグモとオオシロカネグモが造網 …………................…….. 68 鈴木佑弥：テングヌカグモによるムナボシヒメグモの捕食，再び .............................................. 69 鈴木佑弥：ノジマモリヒメグモの網を野外で発見 .................................................................... 70 平松毅久：卵のうを保護するリュウキュウミドリヒメグモ …………………………................…….. 72 平松毅久：建物の外壁にいたヤエヤマナガイボグモ ................................................................. 73 芹田凌平：イズシマヒメグモの新産地 …......................……………………………...............…….. 74 芹田凌平：ニホンヒメグモを捕食したデーニッツハエトリ ....................................................... 75 芹田凌平：ヒゲナガハシリグモを捕食したオオシロカネグモ .................................................... 75 芹田凌平：ヒゲナガハシリグモを捕食したヤマトカナエグモ .................................................... 76 芹田凌平：愛媛県で採集したクモ ......................................................................................... 77 芹田凌平：香川県で採集したクモ ......................................................................................... 78 芹田凌平：静岡県伊東市で採集したクモ ................................................................................ 79 芹田凌平：末吉公園で採集したクモ ....................................................................................... 80 芹田凌平：長野県で採集したクモ .......................................................................................... 81 信太理央：沖縄島でシロスジコアシダカグモを採集 …………………………………................…..... 83 信太理央・松元音旺：与那国島で採集されたクモ .................................................................... 84 信太理央：鹿児島県でドウナガカニグモを採集 ....................................................................... 86 新海栄一：津軽半島龍飛岬のクモ ......................................................................................... 87 新海栄一：岩手県早池峰山のクモ ......................................................................................... 89 長井聡道：カワラメキリグモの派手な色彩変異 ....................................................................... 91 馬場友希：南西諸島で採集されたクモの追加記録 ……………….…………….................................. 93 馬場友希・馬場三男：北九州市山田緑地で採集された九州新記録・福岡県新記録のクモ ..............… 96 馬場友希・田中幸一・大野 豪：沖縄島の有機・慣行水田で採集されたクモ ……….……................. 99 馬場友希・田中幸一：愛媛県の水田で採集されたクモ ……….............................……................… 102 馬場友希・田中幸一：三重県の水田で採集されたクモ ................................................................ 106 芹田凌平：北海道で採集したクモ ........................................................................................... 111 菅波洋平：静岡県伊豆地方の土壌から採集されたクモ類 ............................................................ 115 菅波洋平：長野県の土壌から採集されたクモ類 .......................................................................... 119 久保田 直：佐賀県樫原湿原のササラダニ類 …………………………………………………................. 124 久保田 直：佐賀県石原川土手のササラダニ類 ………………………………………………................. 129 平松毅久・嶋田順一：埼玉県で記録が少ないクモ (埼玉県新記録を含む) ..................................... 135 奥村賢一： 2019 年から 2020 年の冬季に琉球列島で採集したクモ類 .......................................... 138 鈴木佑弥・遠藤鴻明・芹田凌平・野口奨悟：東京蜘蛛談話会 2019 年度山形合宿未報告のクモ ......... 144 新海栄一：石川県舳倉島のクモ ............................................................................................... 148 新海栄一：石川県手取川河川敷のクモ ...................................................................................... 151 平松毅久・嶋田順一：2019 年度東京蜘蛛談話会採集観察会報告 天覧山のクモ .......……................ 154 谷川明男：日本産クモ類目録 ver. 2020 R3 ............................................................................. 162 KISHIDAIA, No.117, Aug. 2020 ヤチグモ類奇形個体の事例 Examples of the deformed specimen of coelotine spiders 奥 村 賢 一 Ken-ichi Okumura ヤチグモ類ではしばしば雌雄生殖器に奇形が生じることがあり，本グループの正確 な同定や分類を困難にする一因となっている．2019 年の KISHIDAIA でも三重県から 得られたカミガタヤチグモの雄触肢が左右で異なっていることを報告した (奥村 2019 )．今回は 2017 年に滋賀県で採集したヒコネクロヤチグモの雌と 2019 年末に奄 美大島で採集したナセヤチグモ雄の事例を紹介する．また奇形として扱うかは不明だが 通常はほとんど見られない状態の個体の例についても報告する． Coelotes hikonensis Nishikawa 2009 ヒコネクロヤチグモ ♀ (図 1) 3–V–2017 滋賀県犬上郡多賀町河内風穴 左側の外雌器突起に相当する箇所が幅広い板状に変化し，外雌器左側面を広く覆っ た状態になっている．しかしよく見ると左外縁付近の小さな黒い部分も外雌器突起の根 元部分の可能性があり，こちらを元の外雌器突起とみなせば内側の広い部分は生殖窩を 取り巻く外雌器突起奥側の lamella が極端に発達した構造ということになる．それぞ れの発達度合いや黒色部分が両方にあることなどを鑑みると，元の突起部分がどのよう に変化したのかは微妙で判断が難しい． 図 1．ヒコネクロヤチグモ 奇形個体外雌器 1 Coelotes nasensis Shimojana 2000 ナセヤチグモ ♂ (図 2, 3 ) 16–XII–2019 鹿児島県奄美市住用町大字川内 (フナンギョの滝周辺) 図 2 が奇形個体，図 3 が正常個体である．意外に思われるかもしれないが，本種は 他の多くのヤチグモ類と異なり雄触肢の中部把持器は正常個体で斜め後方に長く突出 する．この部分が本種を本種たる所以とする最もインパクトのある特徴であり，むしろ 奇形個体の方が他の多くの種においては正常に近い形態である．奇形個体のみを見れば 図 2–3．ナセヤチグモ 雄左触肢 . 2, 奇形個体 ; 3, 正常個体 正確な同定は難しいが，正常個体と比較すると中部把持器以外の部分は形態的にほぼ一 致していることがわかる．本種の雄は長年正体不明で 2018 年に初めて記載したが (Okumura et al. 2018 )，本事例においても分類や記載時において単独個体のみでの 判断は慎重になされるべきであることが示唆された． Coelotes hataensis Nishikawa 2009 ハタヤチグモ 幼体もしくは亜成体(図 4, 5) 13–X–2006 鹿児島県霧島市牧園町高千穂 1200m ハタヤチグモのタイプ産地は高知県南西部だが九州にも北西部から南部にかけて広 く分布している．本事例の採集個体は左触肢を見ると雄の亜成体のようだが，右触肢は 左のように跗節部分の膨らみがなく雌のように見える．しかし左と右で全く異なる形態 になる可能性もあるカミガタヤチグモでの事例を考えると，左右で発達度合いに差が生 じた結果であり，安易に雌雄モザイク個体であるとみなすべきではない．ちなみに腹部 2 図 4–5．ハタヤチグモ 幼体もしくは亜成体 . 4, 左右触肢比較 ; 5, 腹部下面 にはいずれ外雌器になるような構造は見られないが，これについても幼体の可能性が捨 てきれないため，結局雄の奇形か雌雄モザイク個体かの最終的な結論は難しい． 参考文献 Okumura, K., Honki, K. and Ohba, S. 2018. Male description of Coelotes nasensis Shimojana 2000 (Araneae: Agelenidae ) from Amami-ōshima Island, Japan. Acta Arachnologica, 67: 77–79. 奥村賢一 2019. クモ類同定での意外な落とし穴 . Kishidaia, 115: 95–96. 3 KISHIDAIA, No.117, Aug. 2020 アマミホウシグモによるコヒゲジロハサミムシの捕食 Predation of an earwig ( Euborellia annulipes ) by a zodariid spider, Mallinella sadamotoi 馬場友希 1・河野勝行 2 1 農研機構・農業環境変動センター・ 2 農研機構・野菜花き研究部門 ホウシグモ科 (Zodariidae ) に属するクモの一部はアリを専門的に捕食する習性を もつことが知られる (Cushing & Santangelo 2012; Pekár 2004, 2009; Pekár et al. 2014 )．これらのクモは複数種のアリを食べるものから，特定の属のアリを専食す るものまで，アリに対する特殊化の度合いが種によって異なっているため，捕食者によ る餌への特殊化の進化過程を調べる上で興味深いグループである．一方，ホウシグモ科 のクモは全世界で 86 属 1164 もの種が知られるが (World Spider Catalog 2020 )， アリへの特殊化が詳しく調べられているのは特定の属 (Leprolochus ，Pax , Trygettus ， Zodarion ) の種に限られており，その他の多くの種の食性についてはよく分かってい ない．日本国内にもホウシグモ科のクモとして， Asceua 属 1 種と Mallinella 属 5 種 が分布するが，アリの専食性が調べられているのはドウシグモ Asceua japonica 1 種 のみであり (Komatsu 2016 )，他の種も同様にアリを捕食するのかは不明である (小 野・緒方 2018 )． 著者らは奄美大島に分布するアマミホウシグモ Mallinella sadamotoi (Ono & Tanikawa 1990 ) がハサミムシの一種を捕食している様子を観察したので，貴重な事 例としてここに報告する．日時・場所は 2015 年 4 月 9 日午前 9 時頃の奄美大島の山 中であり，著者のうち馬場が地表面で本種のメス成体がハサミムシの仲間を捕食してい るところを発見し，その様子を写真に収めた (図 1)．写真撮影後，ハサミムシはピン セットを用いて回収され， 75% エタノールで保存された後，著者のうち河野によって種 同定がなされた．ハサミムシは体の一部が消化されており標本の状態は良くなかったが， ハサミの発達度合い，腹部背板の節の数，ハサミの形状にみられる左右非対称性，体長， 腹部末端節の後縁の形状および腹節第 7〜9 背板側部における隆起縁の存在などの形態 的特徴 (西川 2016 ) に基づき，ハサミムシ科 (Anisolabididae )のコヒゲジロハサミ ムシ Euborellia annulipes (Lucas 1847 ) の♂成虫と同定された (図 2)．一例のみ 4 図 1 コヒゲジロハサミムシを捕食するアマミホウシグモ 図 2 アマミホウシグモによって捕食されたコヒゲジロハサミムシ ではあるが，この観察結果は少なくとも本種が野外条件下においてアリ以外の昆虫も餌 資源として利用することを示しており，本種ならびに Mallinella 属の食性を理解する 上で有用な手がかりとなる．ホウシグモ科の一部のグループ (Leprolochu s 属， Pax 属) ではアリ以外の昆虫も捕食するという多食性を示すことから (Pekár & Lubin 2009 )， 本種も様々な昆虫を餌として利用する可能性が考えられる．その可能性を検討するため にも今後さらなる観察事例の蓄積が必要である． 5 謝 辞 野外調査に協力してくださった須黒達巳氏（慶應義塾幼稚舎）に御礼申し上げる． 引用文献 Cushing PE 2012. Spider-ant associations: an updated review of myrmecomorphy, myrmecophily, and myrmecophagy in spiders. Psyche: doi:10.1155/ 2012/151989. Komatsu T 2016. Diet and predatory behavior of the Asian ant-eating spider, Asceua (formerly Doosia ) japonica (Araneae: Zodariidae). Springer Plus 5: 577. 西川 勝 2016. ハサミムシ目．日本産直翅類標準図鑑（町田龍一郎監修 日本直翅類学会編）， pp. 170–186. 株式会社学研プラス． 小野展嗣・緒方清人 2018. 日本産クモ類生態図鑑：自然史と多様性 . 東海大学出版部 . Pekár S. 2004. Predatory behavior of two European ant-eating spiders (Araneae, Zodariidae). J Arachnol, 32:31–41. Pekár S 2009. Capture efficiency of an ant-eating spider, Zodariellum asiaticum (Araneae: Zodariidae), from Kazakhstan. J Arachnol, 37:388–391. Pekár S & Lubin, Y. 2009. Prey and predatory behavior of two zodariid species (Araneae, Zodariidae). J Arachnol, 37: 118–121. Pekár S, Šedo
Recommended publications
  • A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    A Checklist of the Non -Acarine Arachnids

    Original Research A CHECKLIST OF THE NON -A C A RINE A R A CHNIDS (CHELICER A T A : AR A CHNID A ) OF THE DE HOOP NA TURE RESERVE , WESTERN CA PE PROVINCE , SOUTH AFRIC A Authors: ABSTRACT Charles R. Haddad1 As part of the South African National Survey of Arachnida (SANSA) in conserved areas, arachnids Ansie S. Dippenaar- were collected in the De Hoop Nature Reserve in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. The Schoeman2 survey was carried out between 1999 and 2007, and consisted of five intensive surveys between Affiliations: two and 12 days in duration. Arachnids were sampled in five broad habitat types, namely fynbos, 1Department of Zoology & wetlands, i.e. De Hoop Vlei, Eucalyptus plantations at Potberg and Cupido’s Kraal, coastal dunes Entomology University of near Koppie Alleen and the intertidal zone at Koppie Alleen. A total of 274 species representing the Free State, five orders, 65 families and 191 determined genera were collected, of which spiders (Araneae) South Africa were the dominant taxon (252 spp., 174 genera, 53 families). The most species rich families collected were the Salticidae (32 spp.), Thomisidae (26 spp.), Gnaphosidae (21 spp.), Araneidae (18 2 Biosystematics: spp.), Theridiidae (16 spp.) and Corinnidae (15 spp.). Notes are provided on the most commonly Arachnology collected arachnids in each habitat. ARC - Plant Protection Research Institute Conservation implications: This study provides valuable baseline data on arachnids conserved South Africa in De Hoop Nature Reserve, which can be used for future assessments of habitat transformation, 2Department of Zoology & alien invasive species and climate change on arachnid biodiversity.
  • A Novel Trade-Off for Batesian Mimics Running Title

    A Novel Trade-Off for Batesian Mimics Running Title

    Out of the frying pan and into the fire: A novel trade-off for Batesian mimics Running title: Salticids that mimic ants and get eaten by ant specialists Ximena J. Nelson*†, Daiqin Li§ and Robert R. Jackson† *Department of Psychology, Animal Behaviour Laboratory, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Email: [email protected] Phone: 61-2-98509232 Fax: 61-2-98509231 §Department of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore †School of Biological Sciences, University of Canterbury, Private Bag 4800, Christchurch, New Zealand Key words: Ants, Batesian mimicry, myrmecophagy, predation, spiders, trade-off Abstract A mimicry system was investigated in which the models were ants (Formicidae) and both the mimics and the predators were jumping spiders (Salticidae). By using motionless lures in simultaneous-presentation prey-choice tests, how the predators respond specifically to the static appearance of ants and ant mimics was determined. These findings suggest a rarely considered adaptive trade-off for Batesian mimics of ants. Mimicry may be advantageous when it deceives ant-averse potential predators, but disadvantageous in encounters with ant- eating specialists. Nine myrmecophagic (ant-eating) species (from Africa, Asia, Australia and North America) and one araneophagic (spider-eating) species (Portia fimbriata from Queensland) were tested with ants (5 species), with myrmecomorphic (ant-like) salticids (6 species of Myrmarachne) and with non-ant-like prey (dipterans and ordinary salticids). The araneophagic salticid chose an ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than ants. P. fimbriata also chose the ordinary salticid and chose flies significantly more often than myrmecomorphic salticids. However, there was no significant difference in how P.
  • Supraspecific Names in Spider Systematic and Their Nomenclatural Problems

    Supraspecific Names in Spider Systematic and Their Nomenclatural Problems

    Arachnologische Mitteilungen / Arachnology Letters 55: 42-45 Karlsruhe, April 2018 Supraspecific names in spider systematic and their nomenclatural problems Yuri M. Marusik doi: 10.30963/aramit5507 Abstract. Three different types of the names used in spider systematics are recognized and discussed: 1) typified taxonomic names, 2) non-typified taxonomic names, and 3) non-taxonomic names. Typified names are those from genus to superfamily group names; they are regulated by the ICZN. Non-typified names are used for taxonomic groups higher than superfamilies (e.g., Haplogynae, Mesothelae, etc.); they are not regulated by the ICZN but have an authorship, a fixed year of publication and are incorporated in a hierarchical classification. Non-taxonomic names are not regulated by any formal rules, unranked, have no authorship or description, and are non-typified. Some difficulties connected with the non-typified names in spider systematics are briefly discussed. Senior synonyms of some non-typified and non-taxonomic names are discussed, and suggestions are given on how to deal with the non-typified names lacking senior synonyms. Keywords: clade name, non-typified name, typified name. Zusammenfassung. Supraspezifische Namen in der Spinnensystematik und ihre nomenklatorischen Probleme. Drei verschie- dene Namenstypen in der Spinnensystematik werden diskutiert: 1) typisierte taxonomische Namen, 2) nicht-typisierte taxonomische Namen sowie 3) nicht-taxonomische Namen. Typisierte Namen reichen von Gattungen bis zu Überfamilien und sind durch die ICZN reguliert. Nicht-typisierte Namen werden für taxonomische Einheiten oberhalb von Überfamilien verwendet (z. B. Haplogynae, Meso- thelae), sind nicht durch die ICZN reguliert, haben aber Autoren, ein Erstbeschreibungsjahr und werden in hierarchischen Klassifikatio- nen verwendet.
  • Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley

    Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley

    TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012.
  • Records of New Genus Chrysilla (Group Spider: Sub-Order: Araneae: Family: Salticidae) in India at Agroecosystem, at Sonitpur, Assam

    Records of New Genus Chrysilla (Group Spider: Sub-Order: Araneae: Family: Salticidae) in India at Agroecosystem, at Sonitpur, Assam

    Journal on New Biological Reports 3(1): 38 – 43 (2014) ISSN 2319 – 1104 (Online) Records of new Genus Chrysilla (Group Spider: Sub-order: Araneae: Family: Salticidae) in India at Agroecosystem, at Sonitpur, Assam 1 2 Mansur Ahmed 1, J. Anam 1, Malabika Kakati Saikia , S.V. Manthen and P. K. Saikia 1 1 Animal Ecology and Wildlife Biology Lab, Department of Zoolgy, Gopinath Bardoloi Nagar, Gauhati University, Guwahati-782014, Assam, India 2 J.D.P.S. Mahavidyalaya, Daryapur, Maharastra-444803 (Received on: 07 March, 2014; accepted on: 22 March, 2014) ABSTRACT The genus Chrysilla (Salticidae) was first described by Thorell (1887) and is insufficiently known. Presently eight species has been reported. Three of them were known only from their males, four from females and only one from both male and females. The type species ( Chrysilla lauta) , C. albens , C. delicata, C. doriai, C. deelemani and C. acerosa belongs to Asia. This is the first record of genus Chrysilla from India. The specimen was collected from sugarcane field of Sonitpur district of Assam, India. The type specimen was deposited in the Biodiversity Museum, Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology and Wildlife Biology lab, Gauhati University, India. The genus Chrysilla can be distinguished from Phintella and Leius by the thin , long and more colourfull bodies, stronger RTA and much longer than wide genital bulb of male palps, copulatory openings separated by one diameter or so and piriform spermathecae of epigyne. The new species is similar to that Chrysilla lauta , Chrysilla deelemani and Chrysilla acerosa but differs from the former two by the wider than long RTA with a ventral tip and the much longer embolus as in Chrysilla acerosa Wang and Zhang, 2012, differ from the later by the shape of prosoma, hight of clypeus, bulbus and median apophysis.
  • 196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 a Revised Checklist of the Spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection Criteria and Lists

    196 Arachnology (2019)18 (3), 196–212 A revised checklist of the spiders of Great Britain Methods and Ireland Selection criteria and lists Alastair Lavery The checklist has two main sections; List A contains all Burach, Carnbo, species proved or suspected to be established and List B Kinross, KY13 0NX species recorded only in specific circumstances. email: [email protected] The criterion for inclusion in list A is evidence that self- sustaining populations of the species are established within Great Britain and Ireland. This is taken to include records Abstract from the same site over a number of years or from a number A revised checklist of spider species found in Great Britain and of sites. Species not recorded after 1919, one hundred years Ireland is presented together with their national distributions, before the publication of this list, are not included, though national and international conservation statuses and syn- this has not been applied strictly for Irish species because of onymies. The list allows users to access the sources most often substantially lower recording levels. used in studying spiders on the archipelago. The list does not differentiate between species naturally Keywords: Araneae • Europe occurring and those that have established with human assis- tance; in practice this can be very difficult to determine. Introduction List A: species established in natural or semi-natural A checklist can have multiple purposes. Its primary pur- habitats pose is to provide an up-to-date list of the species found in the geographical area and, as in this case, to major divisions The main species list, List A1, includes all species found within that area.
  • Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)

    Catalogue of the Jumping Spiders of Northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae)

    INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMATICS AND ECOLOGY OF ANIMALS, SIBERIAN BRANCH OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae) by D.V. Logunov & Yu.M. Marusik KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000 D. V. Logunov & Y. M. Marusik. Catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Moscow: KMK Scientific Press Ltd. 2000. 299 pp. In English. Ä. Â. Ëîãóíîâ & Þ. Ì. Ìàðóñèê. Êàòàëîã ïàóêîâ-ñêàêóí÷èêîâ Ñåâåðíîé Àçèè (Arachnida, Araneae, Salticidae). Ìîñêâà: èçäàòåëüñòâî ÊÌÊ. 2000. 299 ñòð. Íà àíãëèéñêîì ÿçûêå. This is the first complete catalogue of the jumping spiders of northern Asia. It is based on both original data and published data dating from 1861 to October 2000. Northern Asia is defined as the territories of Siberia, the Russian Far East, Mongolia, northern provinces of China, and both Korea and Japan (Hokkaido only). The catalogue lists 216 valid species belonging to 41 genera. The following data are supplied for each species: a range character- istic, all available records from northern Asia with approximate coordinates (mapped), all misidentifications and doubtful records (not mapped), habitat preferences, references to available biological data, taxonomic notes on species where necessary, references to lists of regional fauna and to catalogues of general importance. 24 species are excluded from the list of the Northern Asian salticids. 5 species names are newly synonymized: Evarcha pseudolaetabunda Peng & Xie, 1994 with E. mongolica Danilov & Logunov, 1994; He- liophanus mongolicus Schenkel, 1953 with H. baicalensis Kulczyñski, 1895; Neon rostra- tus Seo, 1995 with N. minutus ¯abka, 1985; Salticus potanini Schenkel, 1963 with S.
  • SA Spider Checklist

    SA Spider Checklist

    REVIEW ZOOS' PRINT JOURNAL 22(2): 2551-2597 CHECKLIST OF SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) OF SOUTH ASIA INCLUDING THE 2006 UPDATE OF INDIAN SPIDER CHECKLIST Manju Siliwal 1 and Sanjay Molur 2,3 1,2 Wildlife Information & Liaison Development (WILD) Society, 3 Zoo Outreach Organisation (ZOO) 29-1, Bharathi Colony, Peelamedu, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu 641004, India Email: 1 [email protected]; 3 [email protected] ABSTRACT Thesaurus, (Vol. 1) in 1734 (Smith, 2001). Most of the spiders After one year since publication of the Indian Checklist, this is described during the British period from South Asia were by an attempt to provide a comprehensive checklist of spiders of foreigners based on the specimens deposited in different South Asia with eight countries - Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan and Sri Lanka. The European Museums. Indian checklist is also updated for 2006. The South Asian While the Indian checklist (Siliwal et al., 2005) is more spider list is also compiled following The World Spider Catalog accurate, the South Asian spider checklist is not critically by Platnick and other peer-reviewed publications since the last scrutinized due to lack of complete literature, but it gives an update. In total, 2299 species of spiders in 67 families have overview of species found in various South Asian countries, been reported from South Asia. There are 39 species included in this regions checklist that are not listed in the World Catalog gives the endemism of species and forms a basis for careful of Spiders. Taxonomic verification is recommended for 51 species. and participatory work by arachnologists in the region.
  • Arachnologische Arachnology

    Arachnologische Arachnology

    Arachnologische Gesellschaft E u Arachnology 2015 o 24.-28.8.2015 Brno, p Czech Republic e www.european-arachnology.org a n Arachnologische Mitteilungen Arachnology Letters Heft / Volume 51 Karlsruhe, April 2016 ISSN 1018-4171 (Druck), 2199-7233 (Online) www.AraGes.de/aramit Arachnologische Mitteilungen veröffentlichen Arbeiten zur Faunistik, Ökologie und Taxonomie von Spinnentieren (außer Acari). Publi- ziert werden Artikel in Deutsch oder Englisch nach Begutachtung, online und gedruckt. Mitgliedschaft in der Arachnologischen Gesellschaft beinhaltet den Bezug der Hefte. Autoren zahlen keine Druckgebühren. Inhalte werden unter der freien internationalen Lizenz Creative Commons 4.0 veröffentlicht. Arachnology Logo: P. Jäger, K. Rehbinder Letters Publiziert von / Published by is a peer-reviewed, open-access, online and print, rapidly produced journal focusing on faunistics, ecology Arachnologische and taxonomy of Arachnida (excl. Acari). German and English manuscripts are equally welcome. Members Gesellschaft e.V. of Arachnologische Gesellschaft receive the printed issues. There are no page charges. URL: http://www.AraGes.de Arachnology Letters is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Autorenhinweise / Author guidelines www.AraGes.de/aramit/ Schriftleitung / Editors Theo Blick, Senckenberg Research Institute, Senckenberganlage 25, D-60325 Frankfurt/M. and Callistus, Gemeinschaft für Zoologische & Ökologische Untersuchungen, D-95503 Hummeltal; E-Mail: [email protected], [email protected] Sascha
  • PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF Hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen

    PDF hosted at the Radboud Repository of the Radboud University Nijmegen The following full text is a publisher's version. For additional information about this publication click this link. http://hdl.handle.net/2066/129008 Please be advised that this information was generated on 2018-02-19 and may be subject to change. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof.
  • Taxonomic Revision of the Longiscapus-Group of Arcuphantes

    Taxonomic Revision of the Longiscapus-Group of Arcuphantes

    Acta arachnol., 44 (2) : 129-152, December 30, 1995 Taxonomic Revision of the longiscapus-group of Arcuphantes (Araneae: Linyphiidae) in Western Japan, with a Note on the Concurrent Diversification of Copulatory Organs between Males and Females Yoh IHARA 1 井 原 庸1):西 日本 の ナ ガ エヤ ミサ ラグモ種 群 の分類 学的 改訂 お よび雌雄 の交尾 器 官の協 同的 多様 化 Abstract The longiscapus group in the genus Arcuphantes (Linyphiidae) is revised based on genital morphology and geographic distributional pattern. This group should be treated as a closely related species group or a single superspecies by their morphology and distribution. Three known species, A, longiscapus, A. hibanus and A. iharai, and five new species, A. saitoi, A. setouchi, A. tsurusakii, A. nojimai and A. okiensis are described. These eight species are only distributed in western Honshu, northeastern Shikoku and some adjacent islands, Japan. It gives para- patric pattern to the distribution except for some cases of narrow overlap. Mor- phological correspondence between male palp and epigynum was found as a species- specific character. Twenty species of the genus Arcuphantes (Linyphiidae) have been described from various areas of Japan. However, their taxonomy is still far from complete, and there are many undescribed species even in the main islands of Japan. What makes the taxonomy more complicated is the remarkable geographic differentiation in their copulatory organs exhibited by the species of the genus. In this paper, I deal with eight species of the genus Arcuphantes (longiscapus, hibanus, iharai and five new species), which are closely related to each other, from western Honshu, Shikoku and some adjacent islands, Japan.
  • Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity

    Through Arthropod Eyes Gaining Mechanistic Understanding of Calcareous Grassland Diversity

    Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Toos van Noordwijk Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Van Noordwijk, C.G.E. 2014. Through arthropod eyes. Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity. Ph.D. thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Keywords: Biodiversity, chalk grassland, dispersal tactics, conservation management, ecosystem restoration, fragmentation, grazing, insect conservation, life‑history strategies, traits. ©2014, C.G.E. van Noordwijk ISBN: 978‑90‑77522‑06‑6 Printed by: Gildeprint ‑ Enschede Lay‑out: A.M. Antheunisse Cover photos: Aart Noordam (Bijenwolf, Philanthus triangulum) Toos van Noordwijk (Laamhei) The research presented in this thesis was financially spupported by and carried out at: 1) Bargerveen Foundation, Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 2) Department of Animal Ecology and Ecophysiology, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University Nijmegen, the Netherlands; 3) Terrestrial Ecology Unit, Ghent University, Belgium. The research was in part commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Economic Affairs, Agriculture and Innovation as part of the O+BN program (Development and Management of Nature Quality). Financial support from Radboud University for printing this thesis is gratefully acknowledged. Through arthropod eyes Gaining mechanistic understanding of calcareous grassland diversity Proefschrift ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen op gezag van de rector magnificus prof. mr. S.C.J.J. Kortmann volgens besluit van het college van decanen en ter verkrijging van de graad van doctor in de biologie aan de Universiteit Gent op gezag van de rector prof. dr. Anne De Paepe, in het openbaar te verdedigen op dinsdag 26 augustus 2014 om 10.30 uur precies door Catharina Gesina Elisabeth van Noordwijk geboren op 9 februari 1981 te Smithtown, USA Promotoren: Prof.