Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency Inc
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Kansas
KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Kansas TIP #: 397003 Juris: EDGERTON Location/Improvement: 207TH GRADE SEPARATION State #: Fed #: County: JOHNSON Type: Length (mi): .2 Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: The 207th Street Grade Separation project would construct a new bridge at the Obligation Construction 2020 Non-Federal LOCAL $0.00 Status: PROJECT HAS BEEN REMOVED PER SPONSOR REQUEST Construction 2020 Federal STPM-KS $0.00 Engineering 2016 Non-Federal LOCAL $0.00 Federal Total: $0.00 Non-Federal Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00 TIP #: 343106 Juris: GARDNER Location/Improvement: I-35 AND GARDNER RD INTERCHANGE; REALIGNMENT OF 191ST STREET State #: N-0657-01 Fed #: STP-N065(701) County: JOHNSON Type: Reconstruction (Added Capacity) Length (mi): .2 Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: Realignment of 191st Street west of Gardner Road. The existing intersection at Obligation Gardner Road will be closed and moved approximately 1000ft north to tie into the Construction 2020 Non-Federal LOCAL $1,325.00 existing intersection at 188th Street. This will relieve congestion and improve safety on the north side of the interchange. This is the first phase of the ultimate Construction 2020 Federal STPM-KS $1,415.00 improvements and will be designed to accommodate future improvements. Construction 2020 Non-Federal STATE-KS $2,510.00 STATE-KS funds are from the Economic Development program. Engineering 2017 Non-Federal LOCAL $543.00 -
The Smart City Challenge – Phase 2 Application
0 Contents 1 Technical Approach ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Detailed Technical Approach ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Holistic, Integrated Smart City Approach .............................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Deployment Phasing and Milestones .................................................................................................. 21 1.3.3 Integrated Pillars and Vision Elements ................................................................................................ 26 1.3.4 Vision Element #1: Urban Automation ................................................................................................ 26 1.3.5 Vision Element #2: Connected Vehicles ............................................................................................... 27 1.3.6 Vision Element #3: Intelligent, Sensor-Based Infrastructure ............................................................... 28 1.3.7 Vision Element #4: Urban Analytics .................................................................................................... -
Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary
2014 Report Year NTD National Transit Database Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Office of Budget and Policy March 2016 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Profile Details ............................................................................................................... 1 Sections ....................................................................................................................... 5 Additional National Transit Database Publications ....................................................... 6 Full Reporting Agencies for Report Year 2014 ................................................................ 7 Small Systems Reporting Agencies .............................................................................. 29 Separate Service Reporting Agencies........................................................................... 41 Planning Reporting Agencies ........................................................................................ 41 Building Reporting Agencies ......................................................................................... 41 Rural General Public Transit Reporting Agencies ........................................................ -
Increasing the Usage of Demand-Response Transit in Rural Kansas
INCREASING THE USAGE OF DEMAND-RESPONSE TRANSIT IN RURAL KANSAS by BRIAN CHRISTOPHER GEIGER B.S., Kansas State University, 2007 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2009 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Sunanda Dissanayake DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Abstract Public transportation in rural America has existed for decades. Its providers are challenged with low populations and long distances in rural areas. Many of these rural transit providers have been in existence for many years, but ridership still remains low. These providers usually operate in a demand-response format, as opposed to large cities, where busses run on fixed routes. This research was conducted to see if any type of service improvements or enhancements could be found in order to increase ridership of demand-response transit service in rural Kansas. In order to determine if ridership of public transportation in rural Kansas can be increased, customer satisfaction surveys were conducted. One survey was distributed to current riders of demand-response systems, one survey distributed to non-riders of public transportation, and the last survey given to providers to obtain basic system information throughout Kansas. -
Kansas Intercity Bus Study Final Report
Kansas Statewide INTERCITY BUS STUDY December 2012 Kansas Statewide Intercity Bus Study December 2012 Prepared for: The Kansas Department of Transportation by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 4435 Main Street, Suite 1000 Kansas City, MO 64111 with: Heartland Market Research, LLC T.J. Brown & Associates Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing System ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Ridership Markets and Stakeholders ........................................................................................................ 1 Demand Analysis and Needs .................................................................................................................... 2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction to Intercity Bus ..................................................................................................................... 5 General Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 5 Operational Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 6 Transportation Interfaces ......................................................................................................................... -
Board Meeting 5815 Marlatt Avenue Manhattan, KS Wednesday, March 3Rd, 2021 4:00 Pm
Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency 5815 Marlatt Avenue • Manhattan, KS | 66503 Phone: 785.537.6345 1.877.551.6345 www.flinthillsatabus.com Board Meeting 5815 Marlatt Avenue Manhattan, KS Wednesday, March 3rd, 2021 4:00 pm This will be a Zoom meeting. 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Public Comment Opportunity 3. Action Item: Approval of February Minutes 4. Update Executive Director’s Report-Anne Smith 5. Update: Mobility Management-Mike Wilson 6. Update: Director of Finance-Melanie Tuttle 7. Discussion Item: Discussion item- FHATA Parking Lot 8. Discussion item- Token Transit 9. Discussion item- FY20 Audit 10. Action Item: 11. Adjournment by Chairperson Next meeting April 7th, 2021 Special Accommodations: Please notify aTa Bus at (785) 537-6345 or 1-877-551-6345 at least 72 hours in advance if you require special accommodations to attend this meeting. We will make every effort to meet reasonable requests. aTa Bus does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, color, or national origin, according to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For more information or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, visit the aTa Bus office 5815 Marlatt Avenue or www.flinthillsaTabus.com. This Project Funded in Part by the KDOT Public Transit Program This Project Funded in Part by the City of Manhattan FLINT HILLS AREA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD MEETING February 3, 2021 | 4:00 pm Remote meeting via Zoom VOTING MEMBERS Present Aaron Estabrook – Manhattan City Commission – Chair Person Present Jeff Underhill – Junction City Commission – Vice