DOCSLIB.ORG

Increasing the Usage of Demand-Response Transit in Rural Kansas

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Increasing the Usage of Demand-Response Transit in Rural Kansas INCREASING THE USAGE OF DEMAND-RESPONSE TRANSIT IN RURAL KANSAS by BRIAN CHRISTOPHER GEIGER B.S., Kansas State University, 2007 A THESIS submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF SCIENCE Department of Civil Engineering College of Engineering KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2009 Approved by: Major Professor Dr. Sunanda Dissanayake DISCLAIMER The contents of this report reflect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and the accuracy of the information presented herein. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the Department of Transportation University Transportation Centers Program, in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. Abstract Public transportation in rural America has existed for decades. Its providers are challenged with low populations and long distances in rural areas. Many of these rural transit providers have been in existence for many years, but ridership still remains low. These providers usually operate in a demand-response format, as opposed to large cities, where busses run on fixed routes. This research was conducted to see if any type of service improvements or enhancements could be found in order to increase ridership of demand-response transit service in rural Kansas. In order to determine if ridership of public transportation in rural Kansas can be increased, customer satisfaction surveys were conducted. One survey was distributed to current riders of demand-response systems, one survey distributed to non-riders of public transportation, and the last survey given to providers to obtain basic system information throughout Kansas. Ridership is significantly skewed toward the elderly, disabled, and those who either choose not to drive or are unable to drive. Those who do not fall into one of these three categories often do not use public transportation in rural areas. For most of the riders, public transportation is their only reliable method of mobility as they are transit dependent. Only 35% of the riders had a personal vehicle they could use to make the trip had public transportation not been available. Riders of demand-response transit systems in rural Kansas are pleased with the service provided as a whole. Non-riders are ambivalent toward demand-response transit service. They appreciate the fact that in many cases general public transportation service exist, but they are also generally unwilling to use it themselves. These are typically choice riders, and are unlikely to switch to demand-response transit due to their other mobility options. It was found that the more vehicles a person has access to in their household, the less knowledge they have about public transportation in their area. These people are content to use the vehicles they have, because it is more convenient than using public transportation in rural Kansas. Improvements to the provider’s system, like extending operating hours and days, along with implementing GIS-assisted scheduling may bring higher ridership. However, this may only increase the number of rides by the same current riders with few new riders grained. Increasing the usage of demand response ridership will continue to be a challenge in the future with the increasing number of elderly in the years to come. Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................vi List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. ix Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................... x CHAPTER 1 - Introduction......................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Demand-Response Transportation.................................................................................. 1 1.2 Rural Kansas Transportation .......................................................................................... 2 1.3 Rural Transit Funding..................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Public Transit Ridership ................................................................................................. 6 1.5 Research Objective ......................................................................................................... 7 1.6 Outline of Thesis............................................................................................................. 7 CHAPTER 2 - Literature Review................................................................................................ 8 2.1 Level of Service.............................................................................................................. 8 2.2 Marketing and Advertising in Public Transportation ................................................... 11 2.3 Cooperative Agreements for Public Transportation Agencies ..................................... 16 2.4 Elderly Riders of Public Transit ................................................................................... 17 2.5 Technology in Public Transportation ........................................................................... 20 2.6 Coordinated Transit Districts in Kansas ....................................................................... 22 CHAPTER 3 - Methodology..................................................................................................... 28 3.1 Survey Creation ............................................................................................................ 28 3.2 Survey Distribution....................................................................................................... 29 3.2.1 Rider Survey Distribution......................................................................................... 29 3.2.2 Non-Rider Survey Distribution................................................................................. 32 3.3 ATA Bus Ridership and Gas Prices.............................................................................. 34 3.4 Methodology – Chi-Square Test of Independence ....................................................... 36 CHAPTER 4 - Rider and Non-Rider Results and Findings ...................................................... 38 4.1 Demographics of Riders and Non-Riders..................................................................... 38 4.2 Frequency and Method of Trips for Riders and Non-Riders........................................ 40 4.3 Rider and Non-Rider Time of Trips ............................................................................. 44 iv 4.4 Location Type of Riders and Non-Riders..................................................................... 47 4.5 Rider and Non-Rider Driver’s Licensing and Handicapped Permits ........................... 48 4.6 Rider and Non-Rider Marital Status ............................................................................. 49 4.7 Rider and Non-Rider Household Information .............................................................. 50 4.8 Nearest Relatives of Riders and Non-Riders ................................................................ 52 4.9 Public Transportation Usage and Knowledge .............................................................. 53 4.10 Education Level of Riders and Non-Riders.................................................................. 58 4.11 Information Access by Riders and Non-Riders ............................................................ 58 4.12 Rider Opinions of Transit Service ................................................................................ 59 4.13 Rider Comments ........................................................................................................... 63 4.14 Non-Rider Opinions of Transit Service........................................................................ 65 4.15 Non-Rider Comments................................................................................................... 69 4.16 Rider Characteristics Grouped...................................................................................... 71 4.17 Non-Rider Characteristics Grouped.............................................................................. 73 CHAPTER 5 - Provider Survey ................................................................................................ 86 5.1 Provider Survey Creation.............................................................................................. 86 5.2 Provider Survey Distribution........................................................................................ 86 5.3 Provider Results............................................................................................................ 87 CHAPTER 6 - Conclusions and Recommendations ................................................................. 94 6.1 Conclusions................................................................................................................... 94 6.2 Recommendations......................................................................................................... 96 References..................................................................................................................................... 98 Appendix A - Example Surveys ...........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Kansas
    KANSAS CITY METROPOLITAN REGION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FISCAL YEARS 2018-2022 Wednesday, November 6, 2019 Kansas TIP #: 397003 Juris: EDGERTON Location/Improvement: 207TH GRADE SEPARATION State #: Fed #: County: JOHNSON Type: Length (mi): .2 Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: The 207th Street Grade Separation project would construct a new bridge at the Obligation Construction 2020 Non-Federal LOCAL $0.00 Status: PROJECT HAS BEEN REMOVED PER SPONSOR REQUEST Construction 2020 Federal STPM-KS $0.00 Engineering 2016 Non-Federal LOCAL $0.00 Federal Total: $0.00 Non-Federal Total: $0.00 Total: $0.00 TIP #: 343106 Juris: GARDNER Location/Improvement: I-35 AND GARDNER RD INTERCHANGE; REALIGNMENT OF 191ST STREET State #: N-0657-01 Fed #: STP-N065(701) County: JOHNSON Type: Reconstruction (Added Capacity) Length (mi): .2 Phase Year of Type Source Cost (IN THOUSANDS) Description: Realignment of 191st Street west of Gardner Road. The existing intersection at Obligation Gardner Road will be closed and moved approximately 1000ft north to tie into the Construction 2020 Non-Federal LOCAL $1,325.00 existing intersection at 188th Street. This will relieve congestion and improve safety on the north side of the interchange. This is the first phase of the ultimate Construction 2020 Federal STPM-KS $1,415.00 improvements and will be designed to accommodate future improvements. Construction 2020 Non-Federal STATE-KS $2,510.00 STATE-KS funds are from the Economic Development program. Engineering 2017 Non-Federal LOCAL $543.00
    [Show full text]
  • Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency Inc
    FLINT HILLS AREA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY INC. BOARD MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, January 5th, 2021 This Meeting Will Be a Remote Meeting on Zoom Time: 4:00 p.m. Call to order Welcome board members and guests Approval of the Minutes of the December Meeting- Executive Director’s Report-Anne Smith Director of Operations Report- Merl Page Mobility Management Report- Mike Wilson New Business- Unfinished business- Discussion item-Executive Committee Appointment Action item- Approve Executive Committee Appointment Discussion item- Nominating Committee Appointment-2 members Action item- Approve Nominating Committee Appointment-2 members Discussion item- Memorandum of Understanding Shared Services and Joint Operations Additional business to be brought before the board Meeting adjourned and our next meeting will be on February 2nd, 2021 at 4:00 p.m. FLINT HILLS AREA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY INC. BOARD MEETING December 1, 2020 | 4:00 pm Remote meeting via Zoom VOTING MEMBERS Present Stephanie Peterson – Flint Hills MPO – President Absent Derek Jackson – KSU Housing & Dining Present Lorene Oppy – At Large Absent Karen McCulloh – At Large Present Jon Wilson – At Large Present Marissa Jones-Flaget – At Large Present Kaitlin McGuire – At Large FHATA STAFF MEMBERS Present Anne Smith – Executive Director Present Melanie Tuttle – Director of Finance – Treasurer Present Merl Page – Director of Operations Absent Mike Wilson - Mobility Manager Present Daphne McNelly – Executive Administrator – Secretary Present Katey Cain – Director of Human Resources MINUTES: Call to Order/Welcome Board Members - Stephanie Peterson at 4:01 pm. Public Comment – No public in attendance Approval of the Minutes from October 2020 Jon Wilson moved to Approve the Minutes. Kaitlin McGuire seconded the motion.
    [Show full text]
  • The Smart City Challenge – Phase 2 Application
    0 Contents 1 Technical Approach ............................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Detailed Technical Approach ......................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Holistic, Integrated Smart City Approach .............................................................................................. 6 1.3.2 Deployment Phasing and Milestones .................................................................................................. 21 1.3.3 Integrated Pillars and Vision Elements ................................................................................................ 26 1.3.4 Vision Element #1: Urban Automation ................................................................................................ 26 1.3.5 Vision Element #2: Connected Vehicles ............................................................................................... 27 1.3.6 Vision Element #3: Intelligent, Sensor-Based Infrastructure ............................................................... 28 1.3.7 Vision Element #4: Urban Analytics ....................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary
    2014 Report Year NTD National Transit Database Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Office of Budget and Policy March 2016 Federal Transit Administration U.S. Department of Transportation Transit Profiles: 2014 Report Year Summary Table of Contents Table of Contents ............................................................................................................. i Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 Profile Details ............................................................................................................... 1 Sections ....................................................................................................................... 5 Additional National Transit Database Publications ....................................................... 6 Full Reporting Agencies for Report Year 2014 ................................................................ 7 Small Systems Reporting Agencies .............................................................................. 29 Separate Service Reporting Agencies........................................................................... 41 Planning Reporting Agencies ........................................................................................ 41 Building Reporting Agencies ......................................................................................... 41 Rural General Public Transit Reporting Agencies ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kansas Intercity Bus Study Final Report
    Kansas Statewide INTERCITY BUS STUDY December 2012 Kansas Statewide Intercity Bus Study December 2012 Prepared for: The Kansas Department of Transportation by: HDR Engineering, Inc. 4435 Main Street, Suite 1000 Kansas City, MO 64111 with: Heartland Market Research, LLC T.J. Brown & Associates Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 1 Existing System ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Ridership Markets and Stakeholders ........................................................................................................ 1 Demand Analysis and Needs .................................................................................................................... 2 Recommendations .................................................................................................................................... 3 1. Introduction to Intercity Bus ..................................................................................................................... 5 General Characteristics ............................................................................................................................. 5 Operational Characteristics ....................................................................................................................... 6 Transportation Interfaces .........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Board Meeting 5815 Marlatt Avenue Manhattan, KS Wednesday, March 3Rd, 2021 4:00 Pm
    Flint Hills Area Transportation Agency 5815 Marlatt Avenue • Manhattan, KS | 66503 Phone: 785.537.6345 1.877.551.6345 www.flinthillsatabus.com Board Meeting 5815 Marlatt Avenue Manhattan, KS Wednesday, March 3rd, 2021 4:00 pm This will be a Zoom meeting. 1. Welcome & Introductions 2. Public Comment Opportunity 3. Action Item: Approval of February Minutes 4. Update Executive Director’s Report-Anne Smith 5. Update: Mobility Management-Mike Wilson 6. Update: Director of Finance-Melanie Tuttle 7. Discussion Item: Discussion item- FHATA Parking Lot 8. Discussion item- Token Transit 9. Discussion item- FY20 Audit 10. Action Item: 11. Adjournment by Chairperson Next meeting April 7th, 2021 Special Accommodations: Please notify aTa Bus at (785) 537-6345 or 1-877-551-6345 at least 72 hours in advance if you require special accommodations to attend this meeting. We will make every effort to meet reasonable requests. aTa Bus does not discriminate against anyone on the basis of race, color, or national origin, according to Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. For more information or to obtain a Title VI Complaint Form, visit the aTa Bus office 5815 Marlatt Avenue or www.flinthillsaTabus.com. This Project Funded in Part by the KDOT Public Transit Program This Project Funded in Part by the City of Manhattan FLINT HILLS AREA TRANSPORTATION AGENCY BOARD MEETING February 3, 2021 | 4:00 pm Remote meeting via Zoom VOTING MEMBERS Present Aaron Estabrook – Manhattan City Commission – Chair Person Present Jeff Underhill – Junction City Commission – Vice
    [Show full text]