Coprological Survey of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Mammals in Dehiwala National Zoological Gardens, Sri Lanka

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coprological Survey of Gastrointestinal Parasites of Mammals in Dehiwala National Zoological Gardens, Sri Lanka Ceylon Journal of Science 45(1) 2016: 83-96 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4038/cjs.v45i1.7367 RESEARCH ARTICLE Coprological survey of gastrointestinal parasites of mammals in Dehiwala National Zoological Gardens, Sri Lanka A.J.M. Kethmini Aviruppola1,*, R.P.V. Jayanthe Rajapakse2 and Rupika S. Rajakaruna1 1 Department of Zoology, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka 2 Department of Veterinary Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, University of Peradeniya, Peradeniya, Sri Lanka Received: 18 April 2016; Accepted: 20 May 2016 Abstract: A cross sectional, coprological survey on applying a more targeted approach to manage the gastrointestinal (GI) parasites of captive mammals in pathogenic species. This study provides baseline data the Dehiwala National Zoological Gardens was on the GI parasites of all the mammal orders at carried out in 2014. Fresh faecal samples from all the Dehiwala Zoological Gardens. mammal species belonging to nine orders: Primates, Carnivora, Perissodactyla, Artiodactyla, Proboscidea, Keywords: Captive mammals, GI parasites, Erinaceomorpha, Lagomorpha, Rodentia and Helminths, Protozoans, Sri Lanka, Zoological Diprotodontia were analyzed. Intensity of parasite Gardens. infections was determined using the McMaster technique. Of the 70 samples, 44 (62.9%) were INTRODUCTION positive for one or more GI parasites. A total of 13 types of GI parasite eggs, cysts and/or oocysts of Zoological gardens play an important role in the Trichuris sp., Strongyloides sp., Toxocara sp., promotion of animal biodiversity by protecting Spirometra sp., Moniezia sp., Nematodirus sp., endangered species (Kelly and English, 1997). Giardia sp., Blastocystis sp., Balantidium sp., Since animals are kept in confined areas, Entamoeba spp., strongyle type eggs, hookworm, and coccidian oocyts were observed. The most common parasitic diseases constitute one of the major stage was strongyle type egg (17.1%) followed by problems in zoological gardens around the world cysts of Entamoeba spp. (14.3%). Of the infected due to high environmental contamination (Rao individuals, 25% had mixed infections. A higher and Acharjyo, 1984). Unlike in the wild, stress prevalence of helminths (81.8%) compared to conditions caused by captivity can diminish the protozoans (47.7%) was observed but this difference resistance to parasite diseases (Geraghty et al., was not statistically significant (Chi square test; 1982; Gracenea et al., 2002; Cordon et al., p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the 2008). Occurrence of parasites in captive animals prevalence of infection among the captive bred, in zoological gardens might vary according to imported or wild caught individuals (Chi square test; husbandry practices, disease prophylactic p>0.05). Mammals of seven orders were infected with GI parasites but lagomorphs and diprotodonts did not measures, parasite-host interactions and have any parasites. Among the herbivores, strongyle treatment administrated (Lim et al., 2008). type, Moneizia, Entamoeba and coccidian infections Captive animals do not show alarming signs of were common while Nematodirus sp. in a porcupine parasitism, if regular de-worming practices are and Spirometra sp. in a flying squirrel were rare. carried out in zoological gardens (Parsani et al., Common parasites of carnivores were, Toxocara and 2001). However, Parsani et al., 2001 further Entamoeba but Blastocystis sp. in coati was a rare argue that some captive animals do show clinical infection. Trichuris and Giardia infections were signs due to parasites even if they are regularly common in Primates. High worm burden was dewormed and some will have no clinical signs evidenced in silver leaf monkey, Hamadryas baboon, even if they are never dewormed and this African lion, black rhino, pony, porcupine and flying squirrel. Although regular deworming is carried out, depends more on the parasite host interactions results of this survey highlight the importance of than deworming practices. Parasites can be faecal analysis before administering deworming and brought into a zoological garden by many ways: *Corresponding Author’s Email: [email protected] 84 Ceylon Journal of Science 45(1) 2016: 83-96 through animal food, (contaminated fruits and the GI parasites of all the mammal orders in vegetables, infected meat or fish, etc), Dehiwala Zoo. intermediate and paratenic hosts (snails, ants, cockroaches and other insects, rodents, etc.), MATERIALS AND METHODS newly acquired parasitized animals and through infected zoo staff and visitors (Pencheva, 2013). Study site and study animals Many species of helminths and protozoans At the time of survey, Dehiwala National are known to infect mammals. Helminths such as Zoological Gardens comprised 70 species of Strongyloides, strongyles, Trichuris, mammals belonging to nine orders: 18 primates, Nematodirus, Toxocara, Moniezia and protozoan 19 carnivores, six perissodactyles, 18 parasites such as Giardia, Balantidium, artiodactyles, two proboscideans, one lagamorph Entamoeba and coccidians are GI parasites and one diprodont, one erinaceomorph and four commonly found in captive mammals rodent species. These mammals were distributed worldwide. The presence of these parasites in the throughout the zoo enclosure providing host may induce morbidity and even mortality maximum possible space per individual. (Nath et al., 2012). They can also act as the Climatically, Dehiwala comes under the wet reservoir of parasites for the domestic mammals zone of Sri Lanka (6°51’-24°5″N and 79°52’- and some of these infections can be zoonoses 22°4″E) with a mean annual temperature of which can spread to the humans (Bogale et al., 27°C. 2014). De-worming is carried out once in every The Dehiwala National Zoological three months and the food given to each animal Gardens (referred to as Dehiwala Zoo here is subjected to regular inspections by veterinary onwards) was established during the early years surgeons (personal communication with the of the 20th century and is one of the oldest zoos Chief Veterinarian at Dehiwala Zoo). in Asia. It is a pioneer institute that possesses, Background information about each mammal manages and conserves wild animals and was collected using a questionnaire, which displays the animal collections to the public. The gathered information on the age, sex, physical Zoo is located in the heart of Colombo city, the location of the animal in the Zoo, details on de- largest city and the commercial capital of Sri worming (last date of deworming and type of Lanka with a population of 4.6 million in the drugs given), and a brief history of the animals’ metropolitan area. Though the apparent objective origin (whether the animal was brought from of setting up this Zoo was to exhibit animals, it is another zoo/country or born at the Zoo). The now treated as an animal welfare facility, physical condition (fur coat, lethargy, appetite of involved in educating the community and an ex the animals) at the time of sampling was also situ conservation center for endangered species noted. Samples of the mammals living in groups (Dehiwala National Zoological Garden website). (eg. monkeys) were taken randomly without Because of the space limitation, many captive considering a particular individual, assuming that animals are caged in close proximity to one if there is a single infected individual in that another and therefore they may succumb to group the others were infected as well. parasitic infections. In a previous study, faecal samples of 13 species of captive primates at Collection of samples Dehiwala Zoo had been examined and reported Fresh faecal samples from all the captive many GI parasites including many protozoans: mammal species at the Dehiwala National Cryptosporidum sp., Balantidium sp., Blastocyst Zoological Gardens were collected from March sp., Entamoeba sp., Giardia sp., and coccidian to October 2014. Approximately 10 g of faeces and nematodes: the larvae of hook worm and the was collected in the morning about 8.00 am eggs of Ascaris, strongyle and Trichuris before the cages were cleaned by the keepers. (Gunasekara et al., 2012). A few years earlier in Each animal was sampled once during the study 2009, Fernando and Udagama-Randeniya studied and if they lived in groups (eg. monkeys, deer) the GI parasites and ectoparasites of captive one sample from the group was taken. For reptiles at Dehiwala zoo. The present herbivores and other less aggressive animals, the coprological survey was carried out to determine faecal sample was collected directly from the rectum. Samples from carnivores and other Aviruppola et al. 85 aggressive mammals were directly picked up off species were identified and number of eggs in the ground with the help of the caretaker. The 0.5 ml was estimated and the number of eggs per samples were collected into small plastic seal gram of faeces (EPG) was calculated assuming bags. During a visit about 20 samples were the method had concentrated all the eggs in the 3 collected at random whenever there was a fresh g of faeces into 0.5 ml. sample of a particular mammal was available and the sampling was done in every month until a Sheather’s sucrose floatation method final target of all the mammal species in Dehiwala Zoo was reached. Samples were Protozoan cyst and oocysts isolation was done by brought to the laboratory in a cooler and were Sheather’s sucrose floatation method. Saturated stored at 4°C until analysis. Processing of the sucrose was prepared and same steps of the samples was completed within a week in the modified salt floatation method mentioned above parasitology laboratory, in the Department of were followed replacing the floatation fluid by Veterinary Pathobiology at the Faculty of saturated Sheather’s sucrose solution. Cysts and Veterinary Medicine at University of Peradeniya oocysts of particular protozoan species in each using a modified salt floatation method, sample were calculated as cysts per gram (CPG) Sheather’s sucrose floatation method, direct or oocysts per gram (OPG) of faeces. saline and iodine mounts. Nematode cultures Quantitative analysis were set up for some species to obtain DNA for molecular analysis to identify up to species level.
Recommended publications
  • The 2008 IUCN Red Listings of the World's Small Carnivores
    The 2008 IUCN red listings of the world’s small carnivores Jan SCHIPPER¹*, Michael HOFFMANN¹, J. W. DUCKWORTH² and James CONROY³ Abstract The global conservation status of all the world’s mammals was assessed for the 2008 IUCN Red List. Of the 165 species of small carni- vores recognised during the process, two are Extinct (EX), one is Critically Endangered (CR), ten are Endangered (EN), 22 Vulnerable (VU), ten Near Threatened (NT), 15 Data Deficient (DD) and 105 Least Concern. Thus, 22% of the species for which a category was assigned other than DD were assessed as threatened (i.e. CR, EN or VU), as against 25% for mammals as a whole. Among otters, seven (58%) of the 12 species for which a category was assigned were identified as threatened. This reflects their attachment to rivers and other waterbodies, and heavy trade-driven hunting. The IUCN Red List species accounts are living documents to be updated annually, and further information to refine listings is welcome. Keywords: conservation status, Critically Endangered, Data Deficient, Endangered, Extinct, global threat listing, Least Concern, Near Threatened, Vulnerable Introduction dae (skunks and stink-badgers; 12), Mustelidae (weasels, martens, otters, badgers and allies; 59), Nandiniidae (African Palm-civet The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species is the most authorita- Nandinia binotata; one), Prionodontidae ([Asian] linsangs; two), tive resource currently available on the conservation status of the Procyonidae (raccoons, coatis and allies; 14), and Viverridae (civ- world’s biodiversity. In recent years, the overall number of spe- ets, including oyans [= ‘African linsangs’]; 33). The data reported cies included on the IUCN Red List has grown rapidly, largely as on herein are freely and publicly available via the 2008 IUCN Red a result of ongoing global assessment initiatives that have helped List website (www.iucnredlist.org/mammals).
    [Show full text]
  • Small Carnivore CAMP 1993.Pdf
    SMALL CARNIVORE CONSERVATION ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT PLAN Final Review Draft Report 1G May 1994 Edited and compiled by Roland Wirth, Angela Glatston, Onnie Byers, Susie Ellis, Pat Foster-Turley, Paul Robinson, Harry Van Rompaey, Don Moore, Ajith Kumar, Roland Melisch, and Ulysses Seal Prepared by the participants of a workshop held in Rotterdam, The Netherlands 11-14 February 1993 A Collaborative Workshop IUCN/SSC MUSTELID, VIVERRID, AND PROCYONID SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC OTTER SPECIALIST GROUP IUCN/SSC CAPTIVE BREEDING SPECIALIST GROUP Sponsored by The Rotterdam Zoo IUCN/SSC Sir Peter Scott Fund United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group A contribution of the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, IUCN/SSC Mustelid, Viverrid, and Procyonid Specialist Group and the IUCN/SSC Otter Specialist Group. The Primary Sponsors of the Workshop were: The Rotterdam Zoo, IUCN/SSC Peter Scott Fund, United Kingdom Small Carnivore Taxon Advisory Group. Cover Photo: Malayan Civet, Viverra tangalunga by Roland Wirth. Wirth, R., A Glatston, 0. Byers, S. Ellis, P. Foster-Turley, P. Robinson, H. Van Rompaey, D. Moore, A Kumar, R. Melisch, U.Seal. (eds.). 1994. Small Carnivore Conservation Assessment and Management Plan. IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group: Apple Valley, MN. Additional copies of this publication can be ordered through the IUCN/SSC Captive Breeding Specialist Group, 12101 Johnny Cake Ridge Road, Apple Valley, MN 55124. Send checks for US $35.00 (for printing and shipping costs) payable to CBSG; checks must be drawn on a US Bank. Funds may be wired to First Bank NA ABA No. 091000022, for credit to CBSG Account No.
    [Show full text]
  • SRI LANKA 19 – 24 July 2018
    SRI LANKA 19 – 24 July 2018 Introduction Tempted for a long time by earlier trip reports from Sri Lanka I finally managed to set up a trip to this great island. This was a part of a longer trip (6 weeks) and due to this and for high cost I cut it down to a 5 nights trip and focused on two areas only. 2 nights in Wilpattu NP and 3 nights around Sigiriya. My main targets were the three smaller cats and Sloth bear. I guess everything already have been said about this areas so I will skip further information about them. I used the famous an VERY excellent service from http://www.birdandwildlifeteam.com/ and my guide were Dulan Ranga Vidanapathirana. Couldn´t be more satisfied with the service. Always willing to put in alot of hours spotlighting and do what it takes to find a certain species. This is what real wildlife guiding is all about. I wish this could be the standard all over the world. Great company as well. Thanx alot Dulan for this wonderful trip! Okey, over to the sightings then. This is my species-list for this 5 days and YES…it was a real success regarding my smaller cats… 1. Indian hare --- Day 1,2,3,4. Many of them. Very common both in Wilpattu and Sigiriya. 2. Grizzled giant squirrel --- Day 3. Also called Sri Lankan giant squirrel. Seen only in Wilppattu 3. Indian Palm squirrel --- Day1,2,3,4,5. Seen all days in Wilppattu and Sigiriya. Very common. 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Os Nomes Galegos Dos Carnívoros 2019 2ª Ed
    Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros 2019 2ª ed. Citación recomendada / Recommended citation: A Chave (20192): Os nomes galegos dos carnívoros. Xinzo de Limia (Ourense): A Chave. https://www.achave.ga"/wp#content/up"oads/achave_osnomes!a"egosdos$carnivoros$2019.pd% Fotografía: lince euroasiático (Lynx lynx ). Autor: Jordi Bas. &sta o'ra est( su)eita a unha licenza Creative Commons de uso a'erto* con reco+ecemento da autor,a e sen o'ra derivada nin usos comerciais. -esumo da licenza: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/deed.!". Licenza comp"eta: https://creativecommons.or!/"icences/'.#n #nd//.0/"e!a"code0"an!ua!es. 1 Notas introdutorias O que cont n este documento Neste documento fornécense denominacións galegas para diferentes especies de mamíferos carnívoros. Primeira edición (2018): En total! ac"éganse nomes para 2#$ especies! %&ue son practicamente todos os carnívoros &ue "ai no mundo! salvante os nomes das focas% e $0 subespecies. Os nomes galegos das focas expóñense noutro recurso léxico da +"ave dedicado só aos nomes das focas! manatís e dugongos. ,egunda edición (201-): +orríxese algunha gralla! reescrí'ense as notas introdutorias e incorpórase o logo da +"ave ao deseño do documento. A estrutura En primeiro lugar preséntase a clasificación taxonómica das familias de mamíferos carnívoros! onde se apunta! de maneira xeral! os nomes dos carnívoros &ue "ai en cada familia. seguir vén o corpo do documento! unha listaxe onde se indica! especie por especie, alén do nome científico! os nomes galegos e ingleses dos diferentes mamíferos carnívoros (nalgún caso! tamén, o nome xenérico para un grupo deles ou o nome particular dalgunhas subespecies).
    [Show full text]
  • Feliforms 21 V-6
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Feliform Sanctuaries Version: December 2019 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 4 FELIFORM STANDARDS 4 FELIFORM HOUSING 4 H-1. Types of Space and Size 4 H-2. Containment 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings 8 H-4. Transfer Doors 9 H-5. Shelter 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 10 H-7. Sanitation 12 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 13 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 15 N-1. Water 15 N-2. Diet 15 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 17 N-4. Food Storage 17 N-5. Food Handling 18 VETERINARY CARE 18 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 18 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 19 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 19 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 20 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Feliforms 21 V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 22 V-7. Breeding/Contraception 23 V-8. Zoonotic Disease Program 24 V-9. Euthanasia 30 WELL BEING AND HANDLING OF FELIFORMS 25 W-1. Physical Well-Being 26 W-2. Social Housing 27 W-3. Introduction of Unfamiliar Individuals 27 W-4. Behavioral/Psychological Well-Being 28 W-5. Feliform-Caregiver Relationships 29 W-6. Handling and Restraint 30 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries W-7. Animal Transport 37 FELIFORMS BEING RELEASED TO THE WILD 32 R-1. General Considerations 32 R-2.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka Cat Tour 2008
    SRI LANKA CAT TOUR 2008 A ten day tour in Sri Lanka to find and observe Fishing Cat, Rusty-spotted Cat, Jungle Cat and Leopard. Steve Morgan 12/11/08 Sri Lanka Cat Tour 2008 1 Introduction This report describes the results of a ten day wildlife tour in Sri Lanka (from 31/10/08 to 9/11/08). 2 Objectives and Scope The principal objective was to find, observe and, if possible, photograph the wild cats of Sri Lanka: Fishing Cat (the top priority), Rusty-spotted Cat, Jungle Cat and Common Leopard. We also planned to spend some time searching for Grey Slender Loris and the endemic Red Slender Loris. Other mammalian targets included Giant Flying Squirrel, Purple-faced Leaf Money and Golden Palm Civet, (the latter at least being something of a long shot). Although the principal focus was on mammals we also hoped to find a good number of birds with a reasonable sprinkling of endemic and spectacular species such as Yellow-fronted Barbet and Black- naped Monarch. The tour covered a variety of sites in both the wet and dry zones, including sites at Sigyria, Wasgomuwa, Yala, Belihuloya and Ratnapura. Exact details of these sites are not given in this report in order to protect confidentiality. 3 The Team The team comprised Phil Telfer and Steve Morgan, led by Sri Lankan guide Uditha Hettige from the well respected Bird and Wildlife Team. Our full time driver was Chandana. 4 Logistics The Bird and Wildlife Team provided a minibus and driver for transportation between sites and for some night driving.
    [Show full text]
  • MMS-Sri-Lanka-Dec-2019
    Trip Report – Sri Lanka, Dec 2019 We spent 5 days/nights mammal watching at the start of our holiday in Sri Lanka. We saw 33 species in total, 27 new for our life list. Everything we saw matches up with many other trip reports to the area, our highlights were sloth bear and a completely unexpected otter. Toque macaque, Wilpattu NP We arranged the trip with Bird & Wildlife Sri Lanka, who are excellent operators and our guide Diluk was great. We concentrated on 3 nights in Wilpattu NP and 2 nights in Sigiriya. December really is the wrong time of year: it's the wet season, so vegetation is high and animals aren't concentrated around water, plus the farmers set of huge frecrackers to scare elephants out of the crops which (so our guide says) also scares off the nocturnal predators. This might explain how we saw none of the small cats. Zero, zilch, nada, despite putting in 24 hours of night spotlighting over 5 nights. Wrong time of year. Also a full moon. Wilpattu NP is dry zone forest with lakes (and lots of fooding when we were there!). Morning and afternoon game drives are by safari truck, and often done as whole-day drives because it's about an hour along the access road into the heart of the park – bit dull doing that four times in a day. It's all about the leopards, although as other species pop up almost anywhere that's not a problem. Chital are common, sambar and muntjac were also seen on every drive.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 SRI LANKA. 18 Nights. 50 Species Including Leopard, Fishing Cat
    SRI LANKA. 18 nights. 50 species including leopard, fishing cat, jungle cat, sloth bear, elephant, stripe- necked mongoose, red slender loris, toque macaque, purple-faced leaf monkey (all 4 ssp.) and blue whale. Plus >172 birds, including Kashmir flycatcher and Pied thrush, and various herps and insects. Dates 10.03.19 – 27.03.19 inclusive Participants Miles Foster and Ingrid Statman Tour operator Bird and Wildlife Team (Deepal and Himesha) www.birdandwildlifeteam.com Guide Dulan Ranga Vidanapathirana Target Species Leopard. Fishing, jungle and rusty spotted cats. Blue whales. Endemic primates. Report author Miles Foster Schedule in brief Day 1 – 3 – Wilpattu Day 4 – 6 – Sigiriya Day 7 and 8 – Kitulglala Day 9 and 10 – Nuwara Eliya / Horton Plains Day 11 – 14 – Tissa / Yala National Park Day 15 – 17 – Mirissa Schedule in detail 10th March – Arrive Colombo. Overnight at Gateway Hotel, Negombo. Day 01 (11th March) – Negombo to Wilpattu National Park (Wilpattu Safari Camp), stopping briefly at Anawilundala Wetland en route. Afternoon safari in National Park Night drive outside park Day 02 (12th March) – Full-day safari in National Park Night drive Day 03 (13th March) – Full-day safari in National Park Night drive Day 04 (14th March) – Depart for Sigiriya (Sigiriya Village) Afternoon mammal-watching in area Night drive Day 05 (15th March) – Mammal-watching in area Night drive 1 Day 06 (16th March) – Mammal-watching in area Night drive Day 07 (17th March) – Depart for Kitulgala (Rest House) Evening and night mammal-watching in Kitulgala area
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Status of the Brown Palm Civet in the Western Ghats, South India Nandini RAJAMANI1, Divya MUDAPPA2, and Harry V
    Distribution and status of the Brown Palm Civet in the Western Ghats, South India Nandini RAJAMANI1, Divya MUDAPPA2, and Harry VAN ROMPAEY3 Introduction The Brown Palm Civet or Jerdon’s Palm Civet (Paradoxurus jerdoni Blanford, 1885) is an endemic carnivore restricted to the rainforest tracts of the Western Ghats, a 1,600 km long hill chain along the west coast of India. The species has been reported from an altitudinal range of 500–1,300 m, being more common in higher altitudes (Mudappa, 1998). They are known to occur in tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats, and in areas such as Coorg they are known to use coffee estates as well (Report of G. C. Shortridge in Ryley, 1913; Ashraf et al., 1993). Due to the nocturnal and arboreal habits of this viverrid, there have been few reliable records of its occurrence and its distribution and abundance has remained poorly documented. This knowledge is critically needed, especially in the light of the major conservation concern in the Western Ghats, which is the loss of large tracts of forest to commercial plantations of coffee, tea, Eucalytus spp., and teak (Tectona grandis), and other developmental activities (Menon & Bawa, 1997). The Brown Palm Civet replaces the Common Palm Civet (P. hermaphroditus) in tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats. It may be sympatric with the Common Palm Civet only in the transition zones between the rainforests and drier habitats. It has a uniformly brown pelage, darker around the head, neck, shoulder, legs, and tail (see cover). Sometimes the pelage may be slightly grizzled. Two subspecies have been described on the basis of the colour of the pelage but both Pocock (1933) and Hutton (1949) state that the colour is extremely variable going from pale buff over Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Longevity Survey
    LONGEVITY SURVEY LENGTH OF LIFE OF MAMMALS IN CAPTIVITY AT THE LONDON ZOO AND WHIPSNADE PARK The figures given in the following tables are based on the records of the Zoological Society of London for the years 1930 to 1960. The number of specimens in each sample is given in the first column. The percentage of the sample that died in less than a year at the zoo is iven in second column. In this way ‘delicate’ zoo species can be noted at a glance. An average fife span of all those individuals living for more than a year at the zoo is given (in months) in the third column. In the fourth column the maximum individual life-span is noted for each species. It must be emphasized that the age of specimens arriving at the zoo is seldom known accur- ately and no allowance has been made for this. All figures refer to the period of time between arrival at the zoo and death at the zoo. Actual life-spans will, therefore, usually be longer than those given. Number o % dead in Average age Ma.life individual less than (in nronths) span in sample 12 month of those (in months) livi 12 man% or longer ORDER MONOTREMATA Tachyglossus aculeatirs Echidna 7 I00 10 Zuglossus bruijni Druijns Echidna 2 - 368 ORDER MARSUPIALIA Caluromys philander Philander Opossum 3 - 50 Philander opossum Quica Opossum I - 1s Lutreolina crussicaudufa Thick-tailed Opossum 6 50 1s Metachirus nudicuudatirs Rat-tailed Opossum 14 71 27 Didelphis marsupialis Virginian Opossum 34 82 26 Didelphis azarae Azara’s Opossuni IS 53 48 Dmyurus uiuerrinus Little Native Cat 2 I00 I1 Dasyurus maculatus
    [Show full text]
  • Sigiriya, Sri Lanka 2010 – Jon Hall
    Sigiriya, Sri Lanka 2010 – Jon Hall Sigiriya Fort In December 2010 I had to work for a few days in Colombo. I'd visited Sri Lanka back in 2000 for a few days vacation but still had a long list of animals I wanted to see including Grey and Red Slender Lorises, Golden Palm Civet, and Fishing and Rusty-Spotted Cats. All of these species are quite findable it seems, with time. But I didn't have much of that ... I had run out of holidays for the year. Where there is a will there is a way however, and I figured I could squeeze in a 72 hour trip. So, on the advice of Phil Telfer (see his trip report), I contacted the Bird and Wildlife Team and asked if Uditha was free to guide me. He was. Given the shortage of time Uditha recommended we focus our effort around the town of Sigiriya and we headed out of Colombo on thursday evening. It ought to have taken 4 hours to get to Sigiriya, but heavy traffic around Colombo and recent heavy rain - which had done turned sections of the road into one large pothole with just a light dusting of tarmac - meant it took over 8 hours. We got to our hotel after 1am, but both Udi and Chandana, our driver, were ready to head out for another 2 hours spotlighting after we checked in. Dedication beyond the call of duty. Lesser False Vampire Bat On Friday, Saturday and Sunday we spent both the mornings and late afternoons in the field, as well as long spotlighting sessions from dusk til 3am on both Friday and Saturday.
    [Show full text]
  • Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries
    Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Standards For Feliform Sanctuaries Version: June, 2013 ©2012 Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries Table of Contents INTRODUCTION 1 GFAS PRINCIPLES 1 ANIMALS COVERED BY THESE STANDARDS 1 STANDARDS UPDATES 4 FELIFORM STANDARDS 4 FELIFORM HOUSING 4 H-1. Types of Space and Size 4 H-2. Containment 6 H-3. Ground and Plantings 8 H-4. Transfer Doors 9 H-5. Shelter 10 H-6. Enclosure Furniture 12 H-7. Sanitation 13 H-8. Temperature, Humidity, Ventilation, Lighting 14 PHYSICAL FACILITIES AND ADMINISTRATION 16 PF-1. Overall Safety of Facilities 16 PF-2. Water Drainage and Testing 16 PF-3. Life Support 16 PF-4. Hazardous Materials Handling 16 PF-5. Security: Feliform Enclosures 17 PF-6. Perimeter Boundary and Inspections, and Maintenance 18 PF-7. Security: General Safety Monitoring 18 PF-8. Insect and Rodent Control 19 PF-9. Record Keeping 19 PF-10. Animal Transport 20 NUTRITION REQUIREMENTS 21 N-1. Water 21 N-2. Diet 21 N-3. Food Presentation and Feeding Techniques 23 N-4. Food Storage 23 N-5. Food Handling 24 VETERINARY CARE 24 V-1. General Medical Program and Staffing 24 V-2. On-Site and Off-Site Veterinary Facilities 25 V-3. Preventative Medicine Program 25 V-4. Clinical Pathology, Surgical, Treatment and Necropsy Facilities 26 V-5. Quarantine and Isolation of Feliforms 27 i Global Federation of Animal Sanctuaries – Standards for Feliform Sanctuaries V-6. Medical Records and Controlled Substances 28 V-7. Breeding/Contraception 29 V-8.
    [Show full text]