DOCSLIB.ORG

Classification, Zoogeography, and Phylogeny of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Classification, Zoogeography, and Phylogeny of The , f ! j ) j . C' " , • :.CLASSIFICATION, ZOOGEOGRAPHY, AND PHYLOGENY OF THE GENUS SINOPHORUS' FOERSTER (HYMENOPTERA: ICHNEUMONIDAE) • By' © PAUL MICHA!l- SANBORNE, B.~c.·, M.Sc. , .A .Thes I s " Submitted to the School of Graduate Studies "\ . i"n Partial Fulfi lment of the Requirements , . for .the Deg ree Doctor •of Philosophy r \ McMaster U~;versity '. Hanllton, Ontario, Canada .. January, 1983 ',. o ) (I) f / n , '. .. j' THE GENUS SI tlOPHORUS FOERSTER, (HYMENOPTERA) i , . " o • I ( , -' • DOCTOR OF- PHILOSOPHY (1983) HcMA~TER UNIVERSITY (Bio)ogy) Hamilton, O~t~rio TITLE: Classific~tion, Zoogeography, and Phylogeny'of the Genus Sinophorus Foer.ster (Hymenoptera : l~hrielll1onidae) : • "(, \ \ \ -, • (i I) .I o TABLE OF CONTENTS ,~ \ L~T ~ OF TABLES. ••.••.••.• .•••.••.•", ••.•••••....•.•..•....•••••••. vi .L1ST Of' FIGURES ••.••••.•••••••.••••••..••...•..••..•.. .... ; .•....••.••• vi i ~llSTRACT : ; .•.••..•••.•...•••••.•. ~V i j i . .' . AC KNOWLE DG EHEHTS ••••••..•'.•••.••••••••••••••.•.•••.••..••....••• ix I NTRODUCT ION. '.' .'••.• ~ , •••••.••..•••••..•••.••••• > ••••• • . • . '.:. 1, d MATERIALS AND METHODS •• : ; V . 2 . i or Collections Studied••..•.•••••••••••••••••.•••••••••.•••••• 2 Term i nology' •••••••.•••••••,' .•• ' '•.•.••• 3 Taxonomic Characters and. thei r Measurement •••• : .• : •.•..•••• '. 3 11'Iustrati9ns '•••••. , ! :.:. 10 ZOOGEOGRAPHY •••••••.•••••.•.' ••••.••.••.....•• : ••••••••.•••••••.•.••. 13 PHYlOGEtlY. : '.••.....•••••••••.'••.••••.•••.•••••.••.••• 28 BIOLOGy •••••••••••••.••••••••••.•.••••••••••••••.•••.••.•.••.•••• 40 T,I\XONOHY ••••.J•••••••..••••••••••••• , •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 46 . \ oeSCrllJtlon.. 0 f s·'Inoph'orus Foer.ster . 46 Keys t~ the North and Hiddle American' Species' of Sinophorus ••.•• 49 . .' . Fern a Jes ;' :. .1.. : •••• ' ••• : • , •••••••••••••• 50 Males •........... : •..........'..........• 0''';" •••••••••••• : ••• ". 64 Keys to the Palearctic Species·of Sinophoru~•••.••••. , •••••••••• 79 . Females , ; .. 79 , Hales •• , •••••••• : ••••·••••••••••• : . 88 C~SSIFEMUR GROUP •••••••••••••••• ; 94 II. arm;'l latus. .. 129 1. crass i femur •••••.••.•••••• 95 12. nigricoxa•• " 131 2. brunnefemur.............. 97 )3. nigridontis.. 135 3. megadon tis••••••••••••••• 100 MONTANUS GROUP ••••••••. 1)8 , . COSTALI S GROUP ..................... 104 14. tur i onus ••••• OS 4. renOOlinatus •• o •••••••••••. 105'/ 15. lat I fossus ••• 142 5. ·sapporoensis••••••••••••• 108 ! 16. m~:mtanus••••• ' 144b 6. pectinatus •............•• l1T i 17. albipalpus••• 150 7. hydr i ae•••••••••••••••••• 115 18. curvatus ••••• 153 8. 9 raec i ens is.. " .... ; ••••••• 120 1 ~. dil·atus ........ .155. 9. Jun iperinus•••••••••••••• 122 20. pal1'idus •••••. 157 v 10. costa f is ................. 126 21. boreus •••• : •• 160 (Hi) ( / \ r .) 22. indistinctus 163 51. longifaci!,s 261 23. geni~ulatus7.•..: ...•• 166 • 52. eruficinctus •. : ...• 264 ..f. .. 24. J apon lOCUS ••••••••••••• 16~' 53,' ·ventosus.~ .....•. ;. 266 25. alpinus . 171 54. furus 21'9 ,/ 26. orient·is 174 55. ·splendidus•........• 272 26a. o. orient is 176 56 •. neof.urus •.·.. ~ ... : .. 275 26b. o. euronotis•.•• T77 57. heliot:,a~•........• 277 26c. o. occidental is. 178 .DESERTUS GROUP •............•• 280 27. i dahoens is ••. e._ .. ;;3. sabulum . 281 . --..;" 179 . ' . 28. popof.en sis••.••..••.•• 183 •. ·d,sertus.·.•...•.••. 283 • 29'• va~ianae••.•...•.•.••• 185. OBTUSUS .G UP ..... :. 286 30. val idus 187 60. 286 31. rhyaCioniae•..•••....• 191 1, 60a. b. ·brochus•.. 288 32. canadens is 195 I GOb. ·b. brev i'p i 1us 289 .' 33 • tunidus - 1971 ·61. obtusus 290' 34. vadabi 1is 201.1 62. 'Infimus 292 . : 35. mason I •••••• '•••••••• " 204 I I 63. sarissophorus•.•.•• 295 36. robustus 207 ., SUj.CATELLUS GROUP ••.••...••.•.299 37. minutus ·..•• 210 64. sulcatel1us••.•••.• 299 33. cotidianus •... : 213 oJ 65. inflatus 3,02 39. l<lnceolatus•••.••••••• 216 66. tahoens is 305 40. androsae...... ,' ....... 221 ALB I DUS GROUP 308. .PRISMATIS GROUP •....'.•••.••.•. " 226 67. fuscicarpus •. ; .•••• 309 ... .. 41. brevi stylus•..•••..• ".226 68. :alfidus 312 42. betulel1ae 230 69. ~nigritel1us 315 43. pri smat i s 234 70•. villosus 319 44. townesorum 237 71. b i 1imbus, .••••••••• 323 RUGOSUS GROUP 24T PLEURAL I5 GROUP •••••••••.•..• 326 45. ru~sus : 242 72. pleura1Is 326 46. striatus•.•••.. ~ .••••• 245 73. punctifrons 330 RUF' COXA GROUP 248 74. colunbiensis• 333 .47. ruficoxa ; ••.•• ,' 2Jr8. 75. \~oodor.um•..••.•..•• 336 " 48. triangularis•••.•••••• 251 76. pciropleurqn •••..••• 338 49. fa1 catus 254 VERICULUS GROUP >43 FURUS GROUP •..••• : •••••••...•••• 257 I 77. sticticaJae···· .. ··.343 I . 50. rufitergum 258· 78. vericu1us ••·•. · .•• ·.346 <iv) r .. \ . 7J. constrictus •••••.•••••• 350 89. caradrinae•..•• '..•• 383 -:. 1 30. punctatus., •.•...•.. :;. 3531 ,90. re Ia t i vus •.• ;' •.•••• 386 81. an i sodon tis........ '.' .•• 356 1 91. planus••.•..•..•.;. 339 XANTHOSTOHUS GflOUP,' ••••.••.••.••• 360 92. erectus•.•.. ; .••..• 393 82. kasp~ryani •••. : ••.•.••• 360 1 93. 1eptofemur. •••..•• .'. 396 33. nitidus••••••••••••••.• 364;.1 94. xanthocoxa • .' •..••.• 398 84. exartemae.. .............. 367! 95. .hall i .............. 401 85. pet io Ius ...............'. 370 96. proceorus ..........' .• 403 x~~tnost~us ~73 I' • 86. •••• 97. neoprocerus ••.••••• 406 87. ' ~ibial is.............',. 376 98. platyfacies ••••. ; .• '409 RELATIVUS GROUP •. ; •••••••••••.•••• 380 C8. PO~()sus. •••'••••••••••••• 380 . AW£NDA 99. inclivous (Costal is Group) ...,•• ,.,...... : •••.:.••••••• , •••••••• 414 100. rot~ndus tFurus Group) •••••••.•••.•••.••••: ••••••• , •••••••: 417 101. peteri (Furus Group); : ~ 419 102, apiculus (Pleural is Group) •••.••••••••••••~ •..••••••••••••• 422 lll3:. m0!'.9ccoensis ePleural is Group) 424 -. ." e ' REFERENCES ••• , .••••••\ .••..•••••• '.' •••••••••••.•••..••.•••..•••••.••• 428 flAps •.....................•.......................• ' .... : ...............•..• 433- FIGURES •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••.·••.•••·•••• , ••••••.••• , •••••••• 5 45 • INDEX TO HOSTS : , ••.• : 631 ... ( (v) .. r LI ST 9F TABLES Frequency distribution of maximum I)rie~r range, in km., o( speClies of Sinophorus in Ilorth and l1iddle lVnerica., P. 18. \ Total number of "species and subspecies, average landmass "1 Interval values (ALlV) and total interval villues (TIV) 'l/ derived from map 3. P. 19. 3. Distribution of Ilorttl and Hlddle lVnerlcan species and 'I subspe,:'ies of S inophorus In relat ion to centers 'tlf ~oncentra- ---I tlon (Map 4). P. 20. , . 4. Dlsslmllarl'ty values among centers of concentration of SiJ+ophorus s~P. in Ncrth and :Iiddlc Jlt.1erica. P. 23. 5. (ndex of disslmi larlty among centers of concentratl,on of Sinophorus ,spp. in North and I1lddle lVnerlca, determined from Table 4. P. 23. ) .. 6-. Postulated ancdstra] and derived character states of selected I structures of species of Sinophorus. P. 29. 7. Sinophorus spp. and their hosts: A comparison of the relative lengths of ovipositors and the feeding 'behaviour of hosts, P. 41. (vI) , , LI ST OF FIGURES FIGURES - 9 Frontal view of heads of Sinophor~s spp. , 10 - 17 Dorsal view of heads of ?inophorus spp.. • 18 - 26. Mandibles of Sinophorus spp. 27 - 35 Mesopleural foveae of Sinophorus spp. ) 36 - 51.. Hind 1egs of §..0E'0rus ·spp. ' • , 52 - 56 Lateral vie.. of 1st abdominal segments 'of Sinophorus spp. 57 E !19. Dorsal viel<.of 1st abdominal segments of Sinophorus spp. # 60 - 62 Dorsa I vIew of terg ites 2 • 3 of abdomens of ina les of ~nophorus spp. • 63 73 • Lateral view of ovipositors of females of Sinophorus ... spp. ~ , 74 - 79 • LateraI view of ovi pes Itor tips of females of Sinophorus spp. ;- • 80 - 86 • Fore and hind wings of the genus ~JP-0plex and the genus Sinophorus. ~ . G7 -'169., Propodea of iinoph~ spp. 170 - 171. Phylogenetic relationships among species groups of Sinopi,or:Js. (v Ii) \ \, I ABSTRACT The world species of the genus Sinqphorus Foerster (Porizontinae= , Campopleginae) are'revised. One hundred and three species and S~ subspecies are recognized, Eighty species and 5 subspecies are described as new: albipalpus, alpinus, androsae, anisodontis, apiculus, armilliltus, betulellae, bilimbus, boreus, br. Ius, brochus (.!:.. brochus,--, .!:. brevipilus), brunl)efemur, columbiensis, co ictus, cotidianus,' curvatus, dilatus', erectus, falcatus, graeciensis, halli, heliothae, hyd,riae, idahoensis, incl ivous, indistinctus, infimus, inflatus, japonicus, kasparyani, lanceolatus, latifossus, leptofemur, longifacies, masoni, megadontis, minutus, moroccoensis, neofurus, ~~rocerus, nigricQxa, nigridontis, obtusus, orientis ,(0. euronotis, £. occidental is, • - j ~. orientis), pall idus, pectinatus, peteri, petiolus, planus"platyfacies, 'poropleuron, porosus, prismatis, procerus, punctatus, punctifrons, rhyaci,onJae, Tobustus, ~ndus, ruficoxa: rUfit~rgum, rugosus, sabulum, ,sapporoensis, sa.rrssOphorus, splendidus" sticticalae, striatus, .. tahoensis, tibial is', townesorum, ,triangularis, tumidus, variabil is, varianae, ventosus, vericulus, vi llosus, "'codorum, xanthocoxa. TI.enty- ~ three species are re-described: albldus (Gmel in), canadensis (Viereck), caradrinae (Viereck), costalis (Thomson), desertus Kasparyan, eruficinctus (\Jalkl~y), exartemae (Uchida), furus (Cresson), fuscicarpus (Thomson), geniculatus (Go-........,,), juniperinus (Holmgren), !!!£!!.~ (Cresson), nlgritellus (Thomson), nitidus (Brischke), pleural is (Thomson), popojensis (Ashmead), relativus (Viereck), renomlnatus (Morley), sulfatel1'us (Viereck), turionus
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera
    ELIZABETH LOCKARD SKILLEN Diversity of Parasitic Hymenoptera (Ichneumonidae: Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae) in Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Eastern North American Forests (Under the direction of JOHN PICKERING) I examined species richness and composition of Campopleginae and Ichneumoninae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) parasitoids in cut and uncut forests and before and after fire in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee (GSMNP). I also compared alpha and beta diversity along a latitudinal gradient in Eastern North America with sites in Ontario, Maryland, Georgia, and Florida. Between 1997- 2000, I ran insect Malaise traps at 6 sites in two habitats in GSMNP. Sites include 2 old-growth mesic coves (Porters Creek and Ramsay Cascades), 2 second-growth mesic coves (Meigs Post Prong and Fish Camp Prong) and 2 xeric ridges (Lynn Hollow East and West) in GSMNP. I identified 307 species (9,716 individuals): 165 campoplegine species (3,273 individuals) and a minimum of 142 ichneumonine species (6,443 individuals) from 6 sites in GSMNP. The results show the importance of habitat differences when examining ichneumonid species richness at landscape scales. I report higher richness for both subfamilies combined in the xeric ridge sites (Lynn Hollow West (114) and Lynn Hollow East (112)) than previously reported peaks at mid-latitudes, in Maryland (103), and lower than Maryland for the two cove sites (Porters Creek, 90 and Ramsay Cascades, 88). These subfamilies appear to have largely recovered 70+ years after clear-cutting, yet Campopleginae may be more susceptible to logging disturbance. Campopleginae had higher species richness in old-growth coves and a 66% overlap in species composition between previously cut and uncut coves.
    [Show full text]
  • Thesis.Pdf (3.979Mb)
    FACULTY OF BIOSCIENCES, FISHERIES AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF ARCTIC AND MARINE BIOLOGY Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities — Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor – October 2014 Cyclically outbreaking geometrid moths in sub-arctic mountain birch forest: the organization and impacts of their interactions with animal communities Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad A dissertation for the degree of Philosophiae Doctor University of Tromsø – The arctic university of Norway Faculty of Biosciences, Fisheries and Economics Department of Arctic and Marine Biology Autumn 2014 1 Dedicated to everyone who has helped me along the way 2 Supervisors Professor Rolf Anker Ims1 Senior researcher Jane Uhd Jepsen2 1 Department of Arctic and Marine Biology, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway 2 Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Fram Centre, Tromsø, Norway Cover photos Front cover – Larvae of Epirrita autumnata feeding on mountain birch during a moth outbreak in northern Norway. Photo: Moritz Klinghardt Study I – Portrait of Agrypon flaveolatum. One of the most important larval parasitoid species in study I. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study II – Carcass of an Operophtera brumata larva, standing over the cocoon of its killer, the parasitoid group Protapanteles anchisiades/P. immunis/Cotesia salebrosa. Photo: Ole Petter Laksforsmo Vindstad Study III – Larva of the parasitoid group Phobocampe sp./Sinophorus crassifemur emerging from Agriopis aurantiaria host larva. Photo: Tino Schott Study IV – An area of healthy mountain birch forest, representative for the undamaged sampling sites in study IV and V. Photo: Jakob Iglhaut Study V – An area of mountain birch forest that has been heavily damaged by a moth outbreak, representative for the damaged sampling sites in study IV and V.
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    Vol. 28, No.3 &4 Fall/Winter 1995 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST PUBLISHED BY THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 28 No.3 & 4 ISSN 0090-0222 TABLE OF CONTENTS Temperature effects on development of three cereal aphid porasitoids {Hymenoptera: Aphidiidael N. C. Elliott,J. D. Burd, S. D. Kindler, and J. H. Lee........................... .............. 199 Parasitism of P/athypena scabra (Lepidoptera: Noctuidael by Sinophorus !eratis (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) David M. Pavuk, Charles E. Williams, and Douglas H. Taylor ............. ........ 205 An allometric study of the boxelder bug, Boiseo Irivillata (Heteroptera: Rhopolidoe) Scott M. Bouldrey and Karin A. Grimnes ....................................... ..... 207 S/aferobius insignis (Heleroptera: Lygaeidael: association with granite ledges and outcrops in Minnesota A. G. Wheeler, Jr. .. ...................... ....................... ............. ....... 213 A note on the sympotric collection of Chymomyza (Dipiero: Drosophilidael in Virginio's Allegheny Mountains Henretta Trent Bond ................ .. ............................ .... ............ ... ... 217 Economics of cell partitions and closures produced by Passa/oecus cuspidafus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidael John M. Fricke.... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 221 Distribution of the milliped Narceus american us annularis (Spirabolida: Spirobolidae) in Wisconsin Dreux J. Watermolen. ................................................................... 225
    [Show full text]
  • Bionomics of Bagworms (Lepidoptera: Psychidae)
    ANRV363-EN54-11 ARI 27 August 2008 20:44 V I E E W R S I E N C N A D V A Bionomics of Bagworms ∗ (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) Marc Rhainds,1 Donald R. Davis,2 and Peter W. Price3 1Department of Entomology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, 47901; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, Washington D.C., 20013-7012; email: [email protected] 3Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona, 86011-5640; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2009. 54:209–26 Key Words The Annual Review of Entomology is online at bottom-up effects, flightlessness, mating failure, parthenogeny, ento.annualreviews.org phylogenetic constraint hypothesis, protogyny This article’s doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090448 Abstract Copyright c 2009 by Annual Reviews. The bagworm family (Lepidoptera: Psychidae) includes approximately All rights reserved 1000 species, all of which complete larval development within a self- 0066-4170/09/0107-0209$20.00 enclosing bag. The family is remarkable in that female aptery occurs in ∗The U.S. Government has the right to retain a over half of the known species and within 9 of the 10 currently recog- nonexclusive, royalty-free license in and to any nized subfamilies. In the more derived subfamilies, several life-history copyright covering this paper. traits are associated with eruptive population dynamics, e.g., neoteny of females, high fecundity, dispersal on silken threads, and high level of polyphagy. Other salient features shared by many species include a short embryonic period, developmental synchrony, sexual segrega- tion of pupation sites, short longevity of adults, male-biased sex ratio, sexual dimorphism, protogyny, parthenogenesis, and oviposition in the pupal case.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumon Sub-Families This Page Describes the Different Sub-Families of the Ichneumonidae
    Ichneumon Sub-families This page describes the different sub-families of the Ichneumonidae. Their ecology and life histories are summarised, with references to more detailed articles or books. Yorkshire species from each group can be found in the Yorkshire checklist. An asterix indicates that a foreign-language key has been translated into English. One method by which the caterpillars of moths and sawflies which are the hosts of these insects attempt to prevent parasitism is for them to hide under leaves during the day and emerge to feed at night. A number of ichneumonoids, spread through several subfamilies of both ichneumons and braconids, exploit this resource by hunting at night. Most ichneumonoids are blackish, which makes them less obvious to predators, but colour is not important in the dark and many of these nocturnal ones have lost the melanin that provides the dark colour, so they are pale orange. They have often developed the large-eyed, yellowish-orange appearance typical of these nocturnal hunters and individuals are often attracted to light. This key to British species is a draft: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/resources-rx/files/keys-for-nocturnal-workshop-reduced-109651.pdf Subfamily Pimplinae. The insects in this subfamily are all elongate and range from robust, heavily- sculptured ichneumons to slender, smooth-bodied ones. Many of them have the 'normal' parasitoid life-cycle (eggs laid in or on the host larvae, feeding on the hosts' fat bodies until they are full- grown and then killing and consuming the hosts) but there are also some variations within this subfamily.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Genetic Structure of the Parasitoid Phobocampe Confusa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in Relation to Its Hosts, Aglais Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae)
    insects Article Ecology and Genetic Structure of the Parasitoid Phobocampe confusa (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) in Relation to Its Hosts, Aglais Species (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Hélène Audusseau 1,2,* , Gaspard Baudrin 3,4,5, Mark R. Shaw 6 , Naomi L. P. Keehnen 1, Reto Schmucki 2 and Lise Dupont 3,4,5 1 Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 2 UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Wallingford OX10 8BB, UK; [email protected] 3 Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Institut d’Écologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris, Univ Paris-Est Créteil, F-94010 Creteil, France; [email protected] (G.B.); [email protected] (L.D.) 4 Institut d’Écologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris, Sorbonne Université, F-75005 Paris, France 5 Institut d’Écologie et des Sciences de l’Environnement de Paris, Université de Paris, F-75013 Paris, France 6 National Museums of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh EH1 1JF, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 25 May 2020; Accepted: 18 July 2020; Published: 28 July 2020 Abstract: The biology of parasitoids in natural ecosystems remains very poorly studied, though they are key species for their functioning. Here we focused on Phobocampe confusa, a Nymphalini specialist, responsible for high mortality rates in charismatic butterfly species in Europe (genus Aglais). We studied its ecology and genetic structure in connection with those of its host butterflies in Sweden.
    [Show full text]
  • Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) Parasitizing Twig and Defoliating Lepidoptera
    Zootaxa 3949 (2): 268–280 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2015 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.3949.2.7 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:340350CB-1B33-4E1A-A35A-0C1468CD1091 Three new species of genus Sinophorus Förster (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) parasitizing twig and defoliating Lepidoptera MAO-LING SHENG1,3, TAO LI1 & JIANG-FENG CAO2 1General Station of Forest Pest Management, State Forestry Administration, Shenyang, Liaoning, 110034, China 2Forestry Pest Control and Quarantine Station of Chengde, Hebei, 067000, China 3Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Three new wasp species are described from the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), Sinophorus bazariae Sheng, sp. n., reared from Bazaria turensis Ragonot (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae) in Dulan County, Qinghai Prov- ince, China, S. nigrus Sheng, sp. n., reared from Epinotia rubiginosana rubiginosana (Herrich-Schäffer) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Weichang, Hebei Province, and S. zeirapherae Sheng, sp. n., reared from Zeiraphera grisecana (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Tortricidae) in Liupanshan, Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region. A key to the species of Chinese Sinophorus is provided. Keywords: Campopleginae, new species, key, hosts, Pyralidae, Tortricidae, China Introduction Sinophorus Förster, 1869 belongs to the subfamily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae), and comprises 114 species (Yu et al. 2012, Sheng & Sun 2014a), of which 47 are from the Palaearctic Region (one also distributed in the Afrotropical, eight in Oriental Regions) (Sanborne 1984), 11 from the Oriental (two also distributed in the Palaearctic and Afrotropical regions) (Sheng & Sun 2014a), one from the Afrotropical, 63 from the Nearctic (three also distributed in the Palaearctic).
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A New Fossil Ichneumon Wasp from the Lowermost Eocene Amber
    Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal ISSN: 1695-6133 [email protected] Universitat de Barcelona España Menier, J. J.; Nel, A.; Waller, A.; Ploëg, G. de A new fossil ichneumon wasp from the Lowermost Eocene amber of Paris Basin (France), with a checklist of fossil Ichneumonoidea s.l. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Metopiinae) Geologica Acta: an international earth science journal, vol. 2, núm. 1, 2004, pp. 83-94 Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=50500112 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Geologica Acta, Vol.2, Nº1, 2004, 83-94 Available online at www.geologica-acta.com A new fossil ichneumon wasp from the Lowermost Eocene amber of Paris Basin (France), with a checklist of fossil Ichneumonoidea s.l. (Insecta: Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae: Metopiinae) J.-J. MENIER, A. NEL, A. WALLER and G. DE PLOËG Laboratoire d’Entomologie and CNRS UMR 8569, Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle 45 rue Buffon, F-75005 Paris, France. Menier E-mail: [email protected] Nel E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT We describe a new fossil genus and species Palaeometopius eocenicus of Ichneumonidae Metopiinae (Insecta: Hymenoptera), from the Lowermost Eocene amber of the Paris Basin. A list of the described fossil Ichneu- monidae is proposed. KEYWORDS Insecta. Hymenoptera. Ichneumonidae. n. gen., n. sp. Eocene amber. France. List of fossil species. INTRODUCTION Nevertheless, the present fossil record suggests that the family was already very diverse during the Eocene and Fossil ichneumonid wasps are not rare.
    [Show full text]
  • Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) Del Estado De Tamaulipas, México
    ICHNEUMONIDAE (HYMENOPTERA) DEL ESTADO DE TAMAULIPAS, MÉXICO SERIE AVISPAS PARASÍTICAS DE PLAGAS Y OTROS INSECTOS No. 6 Enrique Ruíz Cancino Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) del Estado de Tamaulipas, México Serie Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos No. 6 Enrique Ruíz Cancino Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas UAM Agronomía y Ciencias Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México © Derechos Reservados conforme a la ley Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) del Estado de Tamaulipas, México. Serie Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos No. 6. Enrique Ruíz Cancino División de Estudios de Postgrado e Investigación UAM Agronomía y Ciencias Universidad Autónoma de Tamaulipas 87149 Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas México Primera edición 2010 Impreso en Ciudad Victoria, México ISBN Enrique Ruíz Cancino. 2010.“Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) del Estado de Tamaulipas, México”. Serie Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos No. 6. Cd. Victoria, Tamaulipas, México. Editorial Planea. 186 pp. La familia Ichneumonidae es la más grande del Orden Hymenoptera. Sus miembros generalmente son avispas parasíticas de otros insectos, algunos grupos parasitan arañas; otras especies son depredadoras de huevos de arañas o pseudoescorpiones. Se han utilizado con éxito en el Control Biológico de insectos plaga de hortalizas, frutales y forestales. A nivel mundial existen más de 22,000 especies descritas, para México se han registrado más de 1,050 especies identificadas y para Tamaulipas 802 (52 % identificadas), siendo la entidad mejor representada en el país. En este libro se incluyen datos de 26 subfamilias, 275 géneros y 802 especies. Enrique Ruíz-Cancino. 2010.“Ichneumonidae (Hymenoptera) del Estado de Tamaulipas, México”. Serie Avispas parasíticas de plagas y otros insectos No. 6.
    [Show full text]
  • New Records of Campopleginae for Italy (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae)
    Fragmenta entomologica, 49 (1): 109-114 (2017) eISSN: 2284-4880 (online version) pISSN: 0429-288X (print version) Research article Submitted: January 15th, 2017 - Accepted: March 23rd, 2017 - Published: June 30th, 2017 New records of Campopleginae for Italy (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonidae) Filippo DI GIOVANNI 1,*, Matthias RIEDEL 2 1 Department of Biology and Biotechnologies “Charles Darwin”, “Sapienza” University of Rome - Piazzale Valerio Massimo 6, I-00162 Rome, Italy - [email protected] 2 Bärenbadstraße 11, D-82487 Oberammergau, Germany - [email protected] * Corresponding author Abstract The present study is based on material collected through an intensive sampling in north-eastern Italy, with thirteen species of the subfam- ily Campopleginae (Hymenoptera, Ichneumonidae) newly recorded for Italy: Campoletis agilis (Holmgren, 1860), C. thomsoni (Roman, 1915), Campoplex punctulatus (Szépligeti, 1916), C. rothi (Holmgren, 1860), Diadegma annulicrus (Thomson, 1887), Echthronomas ochrostoma (Holmgren, 1860), Hyposoter coxator (Thomson, 1887), H. discedens (Schmiedeknecht, 1909), H. meridionellator Aubert, 1965, H. tenuicosta (Thomson, 1887), Olesicampe binotata (Thomson, 1887), Rhimphoctona melanura (Holmgren, 1860) and Sinopho- rus nitidus (Brischke, 1880). Hyposoter meridionellator Aubert, 1965 (stat. rev.) is recognized as a different species to Hyposoter rufo- variatus (Schmiedeknecht, 1909). The male of Echthronomas facialis (Thomson, 1887) and the hitherto unknown male of Echthronomas ochrostoma (Holmgren, 1860) are described for the first time. The number of Campopleginae known from Italy is raised to 245 species. Key words: Italian fauna, parasitoids, checklist, Echthronomas, Hyposoter. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub: Introduction been reared from a terrestrial Trichoptera larva (Horst- mann 2004). So far, the Campopleginae fauna of Italy con- With more than 24.000 described species (Yu et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Beiträge Zur Bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13: 67–207
    Beiträge zur bayerischen Entomofaunistik 13:67–207, Bamberg (2014), ISSN 1430-015X Grundlegende Untersuchungen zur vielfältigen Insektenfauna im Tiergarten Nürnberg unter besonderer Betonung der Hymenoptera Auswertung von Malaisefallenfängen in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 von Klaus von der Dunk & Manfred Kraus Inhaltsverzeichnis 1. Einleitung 68 2. Untersuchungsgebiet 68 3. Methodik 69 3.1. Planung 69 3.2. Malaisefallen (MF) im Tiergarten 1989, mit Gelbschalen (GS) und Handfänge 69 3.3. Beschreibung der Fallenstandorte 70 3.4. Malaisefallen, Gelbschalen und Handfänge 1990 71 4. Darstellung der Untersuchungsergebnisse 71 4.1. Die Tabellen 71 4.2. Umfang der Untersuchungen 73 4.3. Grenzen der Interpretation von Fallenfängen 73 5. Untersuchungsergebnisse 74 5.1. Hymenoptera 74 5.1.1. Hymenoptera – Symphyta (Blattwespen) 74 5.1.1.1. Tabelle Symphyta 74 5.1.1.2. Tabellen Leerungstermine der Malaisefallen und Gelbschalen und Blattwespenanzahl 78 5.1.1.3. Symphyta 79 5.1.2. Hymenoptera – Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.1. Tabelle Terebrantia 87 5.1.2.2. Tabelle Ichneumonidae (det. R. Bauer) mit Ergänzungen 91 5.1.2.3. Terebrantia: Evanoidea bis Chalcididae – Ichneumonidae – Braconidae 100 5.1.2.4. Bauer, R.: Ichneumoniden aus den Fängen in Malaisefallen von Dr. M. Kraus im Tiergarten Nürnberg in den Jahren 1989 und 1990 111 5.1.3. Hymenoptera – Apocrita – Aculeata 117 5.1.3.1. Tabellen: Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 117 5.1.3.2. Apidae, Formicidae, Chrysididae, Pompilidae, Vespidae, Sphecidae, Mutillidae, Sapygidae, Tiphiidae 122 5.1.4. Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.1. Tabelle Coleoptera 131 5.1.4.2.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Modern Threats to the Lepidoptera Fauna in The
    MODERN THREATS TO THE LEPIDOPTERA FAUNA IN THE FLORIDA ECOSYSTEM By THOMSON PARIS A THESIS PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2011 1 2011 Thomson Paris 2 To my mother and father who helped foster my love for butterflies 3 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First, I thank my family who have provided advice, support, and encouragement throughout this project. I especially thank my sister and brother for helping to feed and label larvae throughout the summer. Second, I thank Hillary Burgess and Fairchild Tropical Gardens, Dr. Jonathan Crane and the University of Florida Tropical Research and Education center Homestead, FL, Elizabeth Golden and Bill Baggs Cape Florida State Park, Leroy Rogers and South Florida Water Management, Marshall and Keith at Mack’s Fish Camp, Susan Casey and Casey’s Corner Nursery, and Michael and EWM Realtors Inc. for giving me access to collect larvae on their land and for their advice and assistance. Third, I thank Ryan Fessendon and Lary Reeves for helping to locate sites to collect larvae and for assisting me to collect larvae. I thank Dr. Marc Minno, Dr. Roxanne Connely, Dr. Charles Covell, Dr. Jaret Daniels for sharing their knowledge, advice, and ideas concerning this project. Fourth, I thank my committee, which included Drs. Thomas Emmel and James Nation, who provided guidance and encouragement throughout my project. Finally, I am grateful to the Chair of my committee and my major advisor, Dr. Andrei Sourakov, for his invaluable counsel, and for serving as a model of excellence of what it means to be a scientist.
    [Show full text]